Title II Higher Education Act SUBMIT REPORTS...Contact Name: Ms. Christine Howard Phone:...
Transcript of Title II Higher Education Act SUBMIT REPORTS...Contact Name: Ms. Christine Howard Phone:...
Title II
Higher Education Act
SUBMIT REPORTS
Program Information
Name of Institution: CUNY Queens College
Institution/Program Type: Traditional
Academic Year: 2009-10
State: New York
Address: 65-30 Kissena Blvd
Flushing, NY 11367
Contact Name: Ms. Christine Howard
Phone: 718-997-5413
Email: [email protected]
Is your institution a member of a Teacher Quality Enhancement (TQE) partnership grant: No
TQE Partnership name or grant number, if applicable:
Section I.a Program Admission
For each element listed below, check if it is required for admission into any of your initial teacher
certification program(s) at either the undergraduate or post graduate level.
Element Undergraduate Post-Graduate
Application Yes Yes
Fee/Payment No Yes
Transcript Yes Yes
Fingerprint Check Yes Yes
Background Check Yes Yes
Experience in a classroom or working with children Yes Yes
Minimum number of courses/credits/semester hours completed No Yes
Minimum high school GPA No No
Minimum undergraduate GPA Yes Yes
Minimum GPA in content area coursework Yes Yes
Minimum GPA in professional education coursework Yes Yes
Minimum ACT score No No
Minimum SAT score Yes No
Minimum GRE score No No
Minimum basic skills test score No No
Subject area/academic content test or other subject matter
verification
Yes Yes
Minimum Miller Analogies test score No No
Recommendation(s) Yes Yes
Essay or personal statement No Yes
Interview No Yes
Resume No Yes
Bachelor’s degree or higher No Yes
Job offer from school/district No No
Personality test (E.g., Myers-Briggs Assessment) No No
Other (Specify: OPI) Yes Yes
Provide a link to your website where additional information about admissions requirements can be
found:
http://qc.cuny.edu
Indicate when students are formally admitted into your initial teacher certification program:
Junior year post bachelors
Does your initial certification program conditionally admit students?
Yes
Please Provide any additional about or exceptions to the admissions information provided above:
Section I.b Program Enrollment
Provide the number of students in the teacher preparation program in the following categories.
Note that you must report on the number of students by ethnicity and race separately. Individuals
who are non-Hispanic/Latino will be reported in one of the race categories. Also note that
individuals can belong to one or more racial groups, so the sum of the member of each racial
category may not necessarily add up to the total number of students enrolled.
Total number of students enrolled in 2009-10 7665
Unduplicated number of males enrolled in 2009-10 1544
Unduplicated number of females enrolled in 2009-10 6121
2009-10 Number Enrolled
Ethnicity
Hispanic/Latino of any race: 967
Race
American Indian or Alaska Native: 11
Asian: 630
Black or African American: 376
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander: 0
White: 3442
Two or more races: 0
Section I.c Supervised Experience
Provide the following information about supervised clinical experience in 2009-10.
Average number of clock hours required prior to student teaching 100
Average number of clock hours required for to student teaching 548
Number of full-time equivalent faculty in supervised clinical experience during this
academic year
59
Number of full-time equivalent adjunct faculty in supervised clinical experience during
this academic year (IHE and Pre K-12 staff)
29
Number of students in supervised clinical experience during this academic year 1132
Please provide any additional information about or descriptions of supervised clinical experiences:
Section I.d Teachers Prepared
Provide the number of teachers prepared, by academic major and subject area prepared to teach
2009-10. (§205(b)(1)(H))
Academic major Number prepared
Education Programs 892
Elementary & Early Childhood Education Birth to 2nd Grade& Grades 1-6 315
Secondary Education, 7-12 310
Special Subject Areas, Grades K-12 267
Total 892
Subject Area Number prepared
Art Education, Grades K-12 31
Biology Education Grades 7-12 10
Chemistry Education, Grades 7-12 5
Childhood Education Grades 1-6 305
Chinese Education, Grades 7-12 1
Early Childhood Education , Birth -2nd Grade 10
Earth Science Education, Grades 7-12 38
English Language Arts Education, Grades 7-12 86
Family & Consumer Sciences Education, Grades K-12 26
French Education, Grades 7-12 6
Italian Education, Grades 7-12 5
Math Education, Grades 7-12 45
Music Education, Grades 7-12 22
Physical Education, Grades 7-12 48
Physics Education, Grades 7-12 1
Social Studies Education, Grades 7-12 89
Spanish Education, Grades 7-12 24
Speech & Language Pathology Education, Grades K-12 16
Students with Disabilities, Birth-2nd Grade 8
Students with Disabilities, Childhood Education, Grades 1-6 45
Students with Disabilities, Grades 7-12 in a Special Subject area 14
TESOL Education, Grades K-12 57
Total 892
Section I.e Program Completers
Provide the total number of initial teacher certification preparation program completers in each of
the following academic years:
2009-10: 1129
2008-09: 928
2007-08: 816
Section II: Annual Goals
Each institution of higher education (IHE) that conducts a traditional teacher preparation program
(including programs that offer any ongoing professional development programs) or alternative
routes to state certification or licensure program, and that enrolls students receiving Federal
assistance under this Act, shall set annual quantifiable goals for increasing the number of
prospective teachers trained in teacher shortage areas designated by the Secretary or by the state
educational agency, including mathematics, science, special education, and instruction of limited
English proficient students. IHEs that do not have a teacher preparation program in one of more of
the areas listed below can enter NA for the area(S) in which the IHE does not have that program.
Teacher
Shortage Area
Goal for increasing prospective teachers trained
Mathematics
Academic year: 2009-10
Goal: 89
Goal met? Yes
Description of strategies used to achieve goal:
Mathematics Undergraduates – Goal 33 – Yes Met
We Continue to recruit students into the TIME 2000 Program which gives them
reduced tuition. Time 2000 host a conference for high school students which attract
them to our program. We also send out brochures and posting to high schools.
Mathematics – Post Bach – Goal 33 – Yes Met
The reputation of our program increased from the visibility created by the Time 2000
program.
Mathematics – Graduates – Goal 20 – Not Met
We show Post-Bach students how they can get their Master’s Degree at the same time
they go for their Post-Bach Initial Certification.
Description of steps to improve performance in meeting goal or lessons learned
(Cont.)
Mathematics
in meeting goal:
Mathematics – Undergraduates
We have continued to enlist the help of the College in sending out Time 2000
brochures.
Mathematics – Post Bach students
We have continued to enlist the help of the College in advertising our programs.
Mathematics – Graduate students
We have continued to enlist the help of the College in advertising our programs.
Science
Academic year: 2009-10
Goal: 15 – Both UG & G
Goal met? Yes
Description of strategies used to achieve goal:
Referrals, phone and e-mail outreach.
Description of steps to improve performance in meeting goal or lessons learned
in meeting goal:
Personal contacts work best.
Special
Education
Academic year: 2009-10
Goal: 86
Goal met? No
Description of strategies used to achieve goal:
For the early childhood special education program, we are in the process of applying
for a personnel preparation grant from the OSEP that will prepare candidates who will
be working with young children and their families from culturally and linguistically
diverse background in high needs communities and schools.
Description of steps to improve performance in meeting goal or lessons learned
in meeting goal:
(Cont.)
Special
Education
We are revising our Masters’ and Post Masters Special Education Programs to align
with the new regulations recently issued by the New York State Depart of Education
on preparing teacher for students with disabilities at the secondary level. The new
regulations will allow teacher preparation programs to train generalists for students
with disabilities in grades 7-12.
Instruction of
limited English
proficient
students
Academic year: 2009-10
Goal: 100
Goal met? Yes
Description of strategies used to achieve goal:
TESOL - Undergraduates – 15-20 – Goal Met
Strong advisement by College Advising Center, financial support for tuition by
Eastern Suffolk BOCES ITI Program.
TESOL - Graduates – 50 – Goal Met
Recommendation by alumni: reputation of program, departmental web site.
TESOL – Post-Masters Advanced Certificate Students – 30 – Goal Met
Recommendation by alumni: reputation of program, departmental web site.
Description of steps to improve performance in meeting goal or lessons learned
in meeting goal:
TESOL - Undergraduates
We have continued to collaborate with the Eastern Suffolk BOCES ITI Program.
TESOL - Graduates
Excellence of program draws high quality of students.
TESOL – Post-Masters Advanced Certificate Students
Excellence of program draws high quality of students.
Other
Academic year:
Goal:
Goal met?
Description of strategies used to achieve goal:
Description of steps to improve performance in meeting goal or lessons learned
in meeting goal:
Provide any additional comments, exceptions, and explanations below:
Section II. Assurances
Please indicate whether your institution is in compliance with the following assurances.
Training provided to prospective teachers responds to the identified needs of the local education
agencies or States where the institution’s graduates are likely to teach, based on the past hiring and
recruitment trends.
Yes
Training provided to prospective teachers is closely linked with the needs of schools and
instructional decisions new teachers face in the classroom.
Yes
Prospective special education teachers receive coursework in core academic subjects and receive
training in providing instruction in the core academic subjects.
Yes
General education teachers received training in providing instruction to children with disabilities.
Yes
General education teachers received training in providing instruction to limited English proficient
students.
Yes
General education teachers received training in providing instruction to children from low-income
families.
Yes
Prospective teachers receive training on how to effectively teach in urban and rural schools, as
applicable.
Yes
Describe your institution’s most successful strategies in meeting the assurance listed above:
Adhering to the conceptual framework of the educational unit of Queens College NCATE (National
Council for the Accreditation of Teacher Education) and the individual SPAS (Special Programs
Associations).
Section III. Assessment Rates
Assessment Code - Assessment Name
Test Company
Group
Number
taking
tests
Avg.
scaled
score
Number
passing
tests
Pass
rate
(%)
State
avg.
pass
rate
State
avg.
scaled
score
031-BEA-French
Evaluation systems group of Pearson
Other enrolled students 1
026 BEA- Haitian Creole
Evaluation systems group of Pearson
Other enrolled students 1
040-BEA-Hebrew
Evaluation systems group of Pearson
All program completers 2008-09 1
032- BEA Korean
Evaluation systems group of Pearson
All program completers 2008-09 1
028 - BEA Mandarin
Evaluation systems group of Pearson
All enrolled students who have completed all
nonclinical courses 1
028 - BEA Mandarin
Evaluation systems group of Pearson
Other enrolled students 1
028 - BEA Mandarin
Evaluation systems group of Pearson
All program completers 2009-10 4
028 - BEA Mandarin
Evaluation systems group of Pearson
All program completers 2008-09 2
037 BEA –Polish
Evaluation Systems group of Pearson
All program completers 2007-08 1
024 BEA -Spanish
Evaluation System group of Pearson
All enrolled students who have completed all
nonclinical courses 2 100 252
024 BEA -Spanish
Evaluation Systems group of Pearson
Other enrolled students 3 99 256
024 BEA -Spanish
Evaluation Systems group of Pearson
All program completers, 2009-10 7 99 257
024 BEA -Spanish
Evaluation Systems group of Pearson
All program completers, 2008-09 2 98 263
Assessment Code - Assessment Name
Test Company
Group
Number
taking
tests
Avg.
scaled
score
Number
passing
tests
Pass
rate
(%)
State
avg.
pass
rate
State
avg.
scaled
score
024 BEA -Spanish
Evaluation Systems group of Pearson
All program completers, 2007-08 6 99 263
006 Biology CST
Evaluation System group of Pearson
All enrolled students who have completed all
nonclinical courses 12 255 12 100 94 258
006 Biology CST
Evaluation System group of Pearson
Other Enrolled Students 8 97 251
006 Biology CST
Evaluation Systems group of Pearson
All program completers, 2009-10 10 257 10 100 99 257
006 Biology CST
Evaluation Systems group of Pearson
All program completers, 2008-09 28 253 28 100 99 257
006 Biology CST
Evaluation Systems group of Pearson
All program completers, 2007-08 22 258 22 100 99 257
007 Chemistry CST
Evaluation Systems group of Pearson
Other enrolled students 1 90 252
007 Chemistry CST
Evaluation Systems group of Pearson
All program completers, 2009-10 5 98 255
007 Chemistry CST
Evaluation Systems group of Pearson
All program completers, 2008-09 6 98 254
007 Chemistry CST
Evaluation Systems group of Pearson
All program completers, 2007-08 4 98 256
008 Earth Science CST
Evaluation Systems group of Pearson
All enrolled students who have completed all
nonclinical courses 2 83 248
008 Earth Science CST
Evaluation System group of Pearson
Other Enrolled Students 4 81 236
008 Earth Science CST
Evaluation Systems group of Pearson
All program completers, 2009-10 9 99 251
008 Earth Science CST
Evaluation Systems group of Pearson
All program completers, 2008-09 6 99 248
Assessment Code - Assessment Name
Test Company
Group
Number
taking
tests
Avg.
scaled
score
Number
passing
tests
Pass
rate
(%)
State
avg.
pass
rate
State
avg.
scaled
score
008 Earth Science CST
Evaluation Systems group of Pearson
All program completers, 2007-08 4 100 249
090- Elementary ATS-W
Evaluation Systems group of Pearson
All enrolled students who have completed all
nonclinical courses 399 260 396 99 99 261
090- Elementary ATS-W
Evaluation System group of Pearson
Other Enrolled Students 94 251 87 93 98 259
090- Elementary ATS-W
Evaluation Systems group of Pearson
All program completers, 2009-10 376 261 374 99 100 262
090- Elementary ATS-W Evaluation Systems
group of Pearson -All program completers,
2008-09 380 262 380 100 100 262
090- Elementary ATS-W
Evaluation Systems group of Pearson
All program completers, 2007-08 387 261 383 99 100 261
003-English Language Arts CST
Evaluation Systems group of Pearson
All enrolled students who have completed all
nonclinical courses 30 235 28 93 89 244
003-English Language Arts CST
Evaluation System group of Pearson
Other Enrolled Students 16 234 14 88 86 239
003-English Language Arts CST
Evaluation Systems group of Pearson
All program completers, 2009-10
75
238
64
85
91
243
003-English Language Arts CST
Evaluation Systems group of Pearson
All program completers, 2008-09 87 236 77 89 95 245
003-English Language Arts CST
Evaluation Systems group of Pearson
All program completers, 2007-08 94 238 88 94 97 245
022- ESOL CST
Evaluation Systems group of Pearson
All enrolled students who have completed all
nonclinical courses 16 240 12 75 93 248
022- ESOL CST
Evaluation System group of Pearson
Other Enrolled Students 5 95 245
022- ESOL CST
Evaluation Systems group of Pearson
All program completers, 2009-10 42 251 41 98 97 250
Assessment Code - Assessment Name
Test Company
Group
Number
taking
tests
Avg.
scaled
score
Number
passing
tests
Pass
rate
(%)
State
avg.
pass
rate
State
avg.
scaled
score
022- ESOL CST
Evaluation Systems group of Pearson
All program completers, 2008-09 24 248 24 100 99 253
022- ESOL CST
Evaluation Systems group of Pearson
All program completers, 2007-08 33 249 33 100 99 252
072- Family and Consumer Sciences CST
Evaluation Systems group of Pearson
All enrolled students who have completed all
nonclinical courses 8
072- Family and Consumer Sciences CST
Evaluation System group of Pearson
Other Enrolled Students 7 100 258
072- Family and Consumer Sciences CST
Evaluation Systems group of Pearson
All program completers, 2009-10 24 256 24 100 100 256
072- Family and Consumer Sciences CST
Evaluation Systems group of Pearson
All program completers, 2008-09 26 252 26 100 100 253
072- Family and Consumer Sciences CST
Evaluation Systems group of Pearson
All program completers, 2007-08 18 261 18 100 100 260
012-French CST
Evaluation Systems group of Pearson
All program completers, 2009-10 4 79 236
012-French CST
Evaluation Systems group of Pearson
All program completers, 2008-09 2 79 235
012-French CST
Evaluation Systems group of Pearson
All program completers, 2007-08 1 84 234
013 German CST
Evaluation Systems group of Pearson
All program completers, 2007-08 1
016-Italian CST
Evaluation Systems group of Pearson
All enrolled students who have completed all
nonclinical courses 4
016-Italian CST
Evaluation System group of Pearson
Other Enrolled Students 1 79 234
016-Italian CST
Evaluation Systems group of Pearson
All program completers, 2009-10 5 83 235
Assessment Code - Assessment Name
Test Company
Group
Number
taking
tests
Avg.
scaled
score
Number
passing
tests
Pass
rate
(%)
State
avg.
pass
rate
State
avg.
scaled
score
016-Italian CST
Evaluation Systems group of Pearson
All program completers, 2008-09 5 89 239
016-Italian CST
Evaluation Systems group of Pearson
All program completers, 2007-08 8 94 243
001-Liberal Arts & Sciences Test (LAST)
Evaluation Systems group of Pearson
All enrolled students who have completed all
nonclinical courses 823 253 790 96 97 256
001-Liberal Arts & Sciences Test (LAST)
Evaluation System group of Pearson
Other Enrolled Students 299 252 277 93 96 255
001-Liberal Arts & Sciences Test (LAST)
Evaluation Systems group of Pearson
All program completers, 2009-10 680 259 667 98 99 258
001-Liberal Arts & Sciences Test (LAST)
Evaluation Systems group of Pearson
All program completers, 2008-09 798 258 792 99 99 259
001-Liberal Arts & Sciences Test (LAST)
Evaluation Systems group of Pearson
All program completers, 2007-08 710 258 703 99 99 258
074- Library Media Specialist
Evaluation Systems group of Pearson
All enrolled students who have completed all
nonclinical courses 10 223 5 50 75 230
074- Library Media Specialist
Evaluation System group of Pearson
Other Enrolled Students 2 89 237
074- Library Media Specialist
Evaluation Systems group of Pearson
All program completers, 2009-10 16 233 14 88 85 235
074- Library Media Specialist
Evaluation Systems group of Pearson
All program completers, 2008-09 18 234 16 89 93 237
074- Library Media Specialist
Evaluation Systems group of Pearson
All program completers, 2007-08 20 236 19 95 95 238
065- Literacy CST E
valuation Systems group of Pearson
All enrolled students who have completed all
nonclinical courses 14 253 14 100 98 258
065- Literacy CST
Evaluation System group of Pearson
Other Enrolled Students 4 98 260
Assessment Code - Assessment Name
Test Company
Group
Number
taking
tests
Avg.
scaled
score
Number
passing
tests
Pass
rate
(%)
State
avg.
pass
rate
State
avg.
scaled
score
065- Literacy CST
Evaluation Systems group of Pearson
All program completers, 2009-10 58 255 56 97 99 260
065- Literacy CST
Evaluation Systems group of Pearson
All program completers, 2008-09 29 257 29 100 99 259
065- Literacy CST
Evaluation Systems group of Pearson
All program completers, 2007-08 20 263 20 100 99 259
018 Mandarin CST
Evaluation Systems group of Pearson
All program completers, 2009-10 1 100 290
004- Mathematics CST
Evaluation Systems group of Pearson
All enrolled students who have completed all
nonclinical courses 38 255 36 95 95 260
004- Mathematics CST
Evaluation Systems group of Pearson
Other Enrolled Students 20 259 20 100 94 253
004- Mathematics CST
Evaluation Systems group of Pearson
All program completers, 2009-10 39 263 38 97 98 260
004- Mathematics CST
Evaluation Systems group of Pearson
All program completers, 2008-09 52 268 52 100 99 260
004- Mathematics CST
Evaluation Systems group of Pearson
All program completers, 2007-08 46 262 46 100 99 257
002-Multi - Subject CST
Evaluation Systems group of Pearson
All enrolled students who have completed all
nonclinical courses 183 246 175 96 91 245
002-Multi - Subject CST
Evaluation System group of Pearson
Other Enrolled Students 45 240 37 82 87 242
002-Multi - Subject CST
Evaluation Systems group of Pearson
All program completers, 2009-10 272 246 252 93 94 247
002-Multi - Subject CST
Evaluation Systems group of Pearson
All program completers, 2008-09 348 247 335 96 97 248
002-Multi - Subject CST
Evaluation Systems group of Pearson
All program completers, 2007-08 346 248 340 98 97 247
Assessment Code - Assessment Name
Test Company
Group
Number
taking
tests
Avg.
scaled
score
Number
passing
tests
Pass
rate
(%)
State
avg.
pass
rate
State
avg.
scaled
score
075- Music CST
Evaluation Systems group of Pearson
All enrolled students who have completed all
nonclinical courses 2 91 242
075- Music CST
Evaluation System group of Pearson
Other Enrolled Students 2 87 241
075- Music CST
Evaluation Systems group of Pearson
All program completers, 2009-10 17 249 16 94 95 245
075- Music CST
Evaluation Systems group of Pearson
All program completers, 2008-09 27 247 27 100 98 248
075- Music CST
Evaluation Systems group of Pearson
All program completers, 2007-08 18 245 18 100 98 248
076- Physical Education CST
Evaluation Systems group of Pearson
All enrolled students who have completed all
nonclinical courses 12 240 10 83 77 234
076- Physical Education CST
Evaluation System group of Pearson
Other Enrolled Students 8 82 233
076- Physical Education CST
Evaluation Systems group of Pearson
All program completers, 2009-10 45 233 39 87 93 237
076- Physical Education CST
Evaluation Systems group of Pearson
All program completers, 2008-09 32 234 28 88 95 237
076- Physical Education CST
Evaluation Systems group of Pearson
All program completers, 2007-08 36 237 35 97 95 237
009- Physics CST
Evaluation Systems group of Pearson
All enrolled students who have completed all
nonclinical courses 1
009- Physics CST
Evaluation System group of Pearson
Other Enrolled Students 1 96 252
009- Physics CST
Evaluation Systems group of Pearson
All program completers, 2009-10 1 95 256
009- Physics CST
Evaluation Systems group of Pearson
All program completers, 2008-09 5 100 259
Assessment Code - Assessment Name
Test Company
Group
Number
taking
tests
Avg.
scaled
score
Number
passing
tests
Pass
rate
(%)
State
avg.
pass
rate
State
avg.
scaled
score
009- Physics CST
Evaluation Systems group of Pearson
All program completers, 2007-08 6 100 258
091- Secondary ATS-W
Evaluation Systems group of Pearson
All enrolled students who have completed all
nonclinical courses 261 255 253 97 98 260
091- Secondary ATS-W
Evaluation System group of Pearson
Other Enrolled Students 121 254 117 97 98 258
091- Secondary ATS-W E
valuation Systems group of Pearson
All program completers, 2009-10 336 258 330 98 99 261
091- Secondary ATS-W
Evaluation Systems group of Pearson
All program completers, 2008-09 435 257 431 99 100 262
091- Secondary ATS-W
Evaluation Systems group of Pearson
All program completers, 2007-08 337 255 335 99 100 261
005- Social Studies CST
Evaluation Systems group of Pearson
All enrolled students who have completed all
nonclinical courses 51 239 44 86 79 238
005- Social Studies CST
Evaluation System group of Pearson
Other Enrolled Students 29 235 25 86 84 238
005- Social Studies CST
Evaluation Systems group of Pearson
All program completers, 2009-10 80 242 72 90 92 243
005- Social Studies CST
Evaluation Systems group of Pearson
All program completers, 2008-09 99 241 93 94 95 242
005- Social Studies CST
Evaluation Systems group of Pearson
All program completers, 2007-08 52 232 46 88 95 242
020 Spanish CST
Evaluation Systems group of Pearson
All enrolled students who have completed all
nonclinical courses 17 263 16 94 96 258
020 Spanish CST
Evaluation System group of Pearson
Other Enrolled Students 9 90 252
020 Spanish CST
Evaluation Systems group of Pearson
All program completers, 2009-10 14 266 14 100 89 248
Assessment Code - Assessment Name
Test Company
Group
Number
taking
tests
Avg.
scaled
score
Number
passing
tests
Pass
rate
(%)
State
avg.
pass
rate
State
avg.
scaled
score
020 Spanish CST
Evaluation Systems group of Pearson
All program completers, 2008-09 17 266 17 100 97 253
020 Spanish CST
Evaluation Systems group of Pearson
All program completers, 2007-08 16 264 16 100 97 254
060 Students with Disabilities CST
Evaluation Systems group of Pearson
All enrolled students who have completed all
nonclinical courses 88 241 85 97 91 239
060 Students with Disabilities CST
Evaluation System group of Pearson
Other Enrolled Students 20 236 15 75 84 235
060 Students with Disabilities CST
Evaluation Systems group of Pearson
All program completers, 2009-10 76 246 74 97 92 240
060 Students with Disabilities CST
Evaluation Systems group of Pearson
All program completers, 2008-09 126 249 126 100 94 240
060 Students with Disabilities CST
Evaluation Systems group of Pearson
All program completers, 2007-08 98 246 98 100 95 240
079- Visual Arts CST
Evaluation Systems group of Pearson
All enrolled students who have completed all
nonclinical courses 5 85 241
079- Visual Arts CST
Evaluation System group of Pearson
Other Enrolled Students 9 85 239
079- Visual Arts CST
Evaluation Systems group of Pearson
All program completers, 2009-10 25 243 24 96 93 242
079- Visual Arts CST
Evaluation Systems group of Pearson
All program completers, 2008-09 25 241 22 88 97 242
079- Visual Arts CST
Evaluation Systems group of Pearson
All program completers, 2007-08 22 235 18 82 96 243
Section 111. Summary Rates
Group
Number
Taking
Tests
Number
Passing
Tests
Pass
Rate
(%)
State Average
Pass Rate (%)
All program completers, 2009-10 797 732 92 94
All program completers, 2008-09 879 834 95 97
All program completers 2007-2008 800 769 96 97
Section IV. Low-Performing
Provide the following information about the approval or accreditation of you teacher preparation
program.
Is your teacher preparation program currently approved or accredited?
Yes
If yes, please specify the organization(s) that approved or accredited your program:
State
NCATE
Other (Specify: Specialty Program Associations)
Is your teacher preparation program currently under a designation as “low-performing” by the
date (as per section 207(a) of the HEA of 2008)?
No
Section V. Technology
Does your program prepare teachers to:
Integrate technology effectively into curricula and instruction
o Yes
Use technology effectively to collect data to improve teaching and learning
o Yes
Use technology effectively to manage data to improve teaching and learning
o Yes
Use technology effectively to analyze data to improve teaching and learning
o Yes
Provide a description of how your program prepares teacher to integrate technology effectively into
curricula and instruction, and to use technology effectively to collect, manage, and analyze data in
order to improve teaching and learning for the purpose of increasing student academic
achievement. Include a description of how your program prepares teachers to use principle of
universal design for learning, as applicable. Include planning activities and a timeline if any of the
four elements listed above are not currently in place.
Both the graduate MAT and undergraduate Initial Certification programs require a course on integrating
technology into the curriculum. In addition to the required technology course, the curriculum methods
courses all integrate technology into their course. Via funding from the Queens College student teacher
fee, we have acquired mobile laptop carts that allow all instructors to integrate educational software
programs and content related internet resources into their courses. As a result, faculty can model effective
use of education technology for their students. Each student has access to a laptop during class time,
allowing for hands-on experiences and development of technology-integrated projects.
Our programs collect data samples from all courses and provide them to the assessment coordinator, who
manages the data in an electronic database. The assessment coordinator provides program faculty with
reports on student performance in their classes. This data base system is currently being revised and
updated to allow faculty more direct access to their course data.
Section VI. Teacher Training
Does your program prepare general education teachers to:
Teach students with disabilities effectively
o Yes
Participate as a member of individualized education program teams
o No
Teach students who are limited English proficient effectively
o Yes
Provide a description of how your program prepares general education teachers to teach students
with disabilities effectively, including training related to participation as a member of
individualized education programs teams, as defined in section 614(d)(1)(B) of the Individuals with
Disabilities Education Act, and to effectively teach students who are limited English proficient.
Include planning activities and a timeline if any of the three elements listed above are not currently
in place.
ELEMENTARY & EARLY CHILDHOOD EDUCATION
Our Initial Certificate Programs will include the requirement of three semester house of study in meeting
the needs of students with disabilities for candidates entering programs on or after the Fall 2011 semester.
The three semester hours will include:
Effective practices for planning and designing co-teaching and collaboration with peers
Categories of disabilities
Identification and remediation of disabilities
The special education process and State and federal education laws and regulations
Individual instruction
Applying positive behavioral supports and interventions to address students and classroom
management needs
In addition, students will spend 15 of their 100 pre-student teaching hours with students with disabilities.
SECONDARY EDUCATION
Students are required to take coursework in all of our Initial Education Programs. Students with special
needs are included in our coursework curriculum such as SEYS 201, 221, 350, 536, and 700.
For instance:
Education Psychology
This course gives an overview of developmental and instructional issues in teaching middle childhood
and adolescents. The role of technology in cognition and instruction in diverse learners including those
within the range of disabilities and exceptionalities will be examined. Second language development and
issues related to language acquisition and English language proficiency will also be explored.
Standards-Based Curriculum and Assessment in Teaching
An examination of current standards-based curriculum and assessment strategies and how they can be
transformed into effective classroom practice. This class is co-requisite with another Secondary Education
course so as to enrich the student teacher’s understanding of curriculum and assessment issues within an
actual classroom. Special topics include strategies for preparing students for Standardized Examinations,
ways of integrating innovative curricula and technology in instruction and assessment for diverse student
populations, including those with special needs.
In addition, our Initial Certificate Programs will include the requirement of three semester house of study
in meeting the needs of students with disabilities for candidates entering programs on or after the Fall
2011 semester. The three semester hours will include:
Effective practices for planning and designing co-teaching and collaboration with peers
Categories of disabilities
Identification and remediation of disabilities
The special education process and State and Federal education laws and regulations
Individualized instruction
Applying positive behavioral supports and interventions to address students and classroom
management needs
In addition, students will spend 15 of their 100 pre-student teaching hours with students with disabilities.
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION & COMMUNITY SERVICES – SCHOOL PSYCHOLOGY,
COUNSELOR EDUCATION, AND ADMINISTRATION & SUPERVISION PROGRAM
Programs leading to first certification either Initial or Provisional Certification will include the
requirement of three semester house of study in meeting the needs of students with disabilities for
candidates entering programs on or after the Fall 2011 semester. The three semester hours will include:
Effective practices for planning and designing co-teaching ad collaboration with peers
Categories of disabilities
Identification
And remediation of disabilities
The special education process and State and federal education laws and regulations
Individualized instruction
Applying positive behavioral supports and interventions to address student and classroom
management needs.
SPECIAL SUBJECT AREAS – MUSIC, PHYSICAL EDUCATION, FAMILY & CONSUMER
SCIENCES, TESOL, SCHOOL LIBRARY MEDIAL SPECIALIST, AND SPEECH & LANGUAGE
PATHOLOGY
If the program leads to the first Initial Certification, the new course will be included in their programs.
The requirement of three semester hours of study in meeting the needs of students with disabilities for
candidates entering programs on or after the fall 2011 semester will be included in the course of study.
The three semester hours will include:
Effective practices for planning and designing co-teaching ad collaboration with peers
Categories of disabilities
Identification
And remediation of disabilities
The special education process and State and federal education laws and regulations
Individualized instruction
Applying positive behavioral supports and interventions to address student and classroom
management needs.
Does your program prepare special education teachers to:
Teach students with disabilities effectively
o Yes
Participate as a member of individualized education program teams
o Yes
Teach students who are limited English proficient effectively
o Yes
Provide a description of how your program prepares general education teachers to teach students
with disabilities effectively, including training related to participation as a member of
individualized education programs teams, as defined in section 614(d)(1)(B) of the Individuals with
Disabilities Education Act, and to effectively teach students who are limited English proficient.
Include activities and a timeline if any of the three elements listed above are not currently in place.
As specified by the NYSED candidates for certification as special education teachers must show
competency in all the pedagogical core areas unique in developing comprehensive knowledge,
understanding, and skills for teaching students with mild moderate, and multiple disabilities. These
additional pedagogical areas are:
1. The historical, social, and legal foundations of special education, employment, and independence
for individuals with disabilities.
2. The characteristics of learners with disabilities.
3. Managing behavior students with disabilities and promoting development of positive social
interaction skills.
4. Participating in collaborative partnerships for the benefit of students with disabilities, including
family strengthening partnerships.
5. Assessment, diagnosis, and evaluation of students with disabilities.
6. Curriculum development and research-validated methods of instructing students with disabilities,
including methods of teaching reading and mathematics and methods of enrichment and
remediation in reading and mathematics,
7. Use of assistive instructional technology in the teaching of learning by students with disabilities.
8. Planning and managing teaching and learning environments individual with disabilities, including
planning for and supporting students with disabilities in general education settings.
Our Graduate Programs in Special Education prepare special education teachers to teach students with
disabilities effectively through carefully designed course sequence that address the above mentioned
pedagogical areas.
Section VII. Contextual Information
Please use this space to provide any additional information that describes your teacher preparation
programs(s). You may also attach information to this report card. The U.S. Department of
Education is especially interested in any evaluation plans of interim or final reports that may be
available.
Supporting files:
Section VIII Report Card Certification
Report Card Certification
Please make sure your entire report card is complete and accurate before completing this section.
Once your report card is certified you will not be able to edit your data.
Certification of Submission
I certify that, to the best of my knowledge, the information in this report is accurate and complete
and conforms to the definitions and instruction used in the Higher Education Opportunity Act,
Title II: Reporting Reference and User Manual.
Name of responsible reprehensive for teacher preparation program:
Christine I Howard
Title: Coordinator of Title II for Queens College, CUNY
I certify that, to the best of my knowledge, the information in this report is accurate and complete
and conforms to the definitions and instruction used in the Higher Education Opportunity Act,
Title II: Reporting Reference and User Manual.
Name of reviewer:
Philip M. Anderson
Title: Associate Dean of Education
CUNY Queens College
Alternative, IHE-Based Program
2009-10
Title II, Higher Education Act
OMB Control No.: 1840-0744 (exp. 9/30/2012)