Tina M. Morrison, Ph.D. - Amazon S3 · Tina M. Morrison, Ph.D. Advisor, Computational Modeling...

22
2014 Tina M. Morrison, Ph.D. Advisor, Computational Modeling Office of Device Evaluation CDRH/U.S. FDA 2014

Transcript of Tina M. Morrison, Ph.D. - Amazon S3 · Tina M. Morrison, Ph.D. Advisor, Computational Modeling...

2014

Tina M. Morrison, Ph.D.Advisor, Computational Modeling

Office of Device Evaluation

CDRH/U.S. FDA

2014

2014

Regulatory Science

Regulatory Science is the science of developing new tools, standards, and approaches to assess the safety, efficacy, quality, and performance of all FDA‐regulated products.

Computational modeling and simulation (CM&S) is not a new tool but can be leveraged in a new way to greatly impact premarket submissions of medical products.

2

2014

Advancing Regulatory Science

Science Priority Areas

#1 Modernize Toxicology

#2 Stimulate Innovation in Clinical Evaluations and Personalized Medicine to Improve Product Development and Patient Outcomes

#4 Ensure FDA Readiness to Evaluate Innovative Emerging Technologies

#5 Harness Diverse Data through Information Sciences to Improve Health Outcomes

(Q)SAR models to predict human risk Computer models of cells, organs, and systems to better predict product safety and efficacy 

Virtual physiologic patients for testing medical products

Clinical trial simulations that reveal interactions between therapeutic effects, patient characteristics, and disease variables

Knowledge building tools Methods to verify, store, share

1, http://www.fda.gov/downloads/ScienceResearch/SpecialTopics/RegulatoryScience/UCM268225.pdf

FDA has identified an important role for CM&S in its strategic priorities1.

3

2014

CM&S as valid scientific evidence

e.g., fatigue safety factors

CM&S is the medical device

e.g., clinical decision support

The Role of CM&S at CDRH

4

CM&S embedded in a medical device e.g., physiological 

model in a control system

2014

The Role of CM&S at CDRH

medicalnewstoday.com

CM&S embedded in a medical 

device e.g., logical algorithm in a control system

5

2014

The Role of CM&S at CDRH

6

heartflow.com

CM&S is the medical device

e.g., clinical decision support

2014

The Role of CM&S at CDRH

7Kelm, Int J  of Med Sci 2009

Bluestein, PLOS ‐ 2012

CM&S as valid scientific evidence

e.g., fatigue safety factors

2014

Medical Device Evaluation

8

Comprehensive evaluation of a premarket submission for a therapeutic medical device is typically supported by a combination of valid scientific evidence from four types of models: animal, bench, computational, and human.

Because each model has different strengths and limitations for predicting real‐world clinical outcomes, the data portfolio for different use‐conditions will vary.

2014

Medical Device Development with CM&S

9

The Total Product Life Cycle

2014

CM&S are typically Relative• Design Optimization• Virtual Prototyping• Rationale for Pre‐Clinical Evaluation• Root Cause Investigations + Redesigns• Next Generation Designs

Medical Device Development with CM&S

10

CMS REIMBURSEMENT

POSTMARKET

MONITORING

CMSEVALUATION

CMSREIMBURSEDECISION

REAL‐WORLDPRODUCT

PERFORMANCE

FDAREGULATORYDECISION

PRODUCTLAUNCHCLINICAL

PRE‐CLINICALINVENTION

+PROTOTYPING

DISCOVERY+

IDEATION

NEXT GENERATIONPRODUCT 

DEVELOPMENT

The Total Product Life Cycle - Updated

2014

CM&S OpportunityPredict Product Success/Failure to support:

Regulatory decisionsReimbursement decisions

Medical Device Development with CM&S

11

CMS REIMBURSEMENT

POSTMARKET

MONITORING

CMSEVALUATION

CMSREIMBURSEDECISION

REAL‐WORLDPRODUCT

PERFORMANCE

FDAREGULATORYDECISION

PRODUCTLAUNCHCLINICAL

PRE‐CLINICALINVENTION

+PROTOTYPING

DISCOVERY+

IDEATION

NEXT GENERATIONPRODUCT 

DEVELOPMENT

The Total Product Life Cycle - Updated

2014

Some of the challengeswith the current practice …

… have led us to address the need for:

guidance on documentation and reporting CM&S results in premarket submissions;• FDA DRAFT Guidance on Reporting of Computational Modeling 

Studies in Medical Device Submissions – published Jan 20142

systematic assessment and understanding of device‐use conditions;• Critical Path Innitiative3

• FDA Library of Models and Simulation4

• Medical Device Innovation Consortium5

12

2, http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/DeviceRegulationandGuidance/GuidanceDocuments/ucm371016.htm3, http://www.fda.gov/ScienceResearch/SpecialTopics/CriticalPathInitiative/default.htm4, http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/NewsEvents/WorkshopsConferences/ucm346375.htm5, http://mdic.org/projects/computer‐modeling/

2014

FDA Digital Library of M&S

The vision is that the Library will be a mechanism for curating public open‐use models and simulations in a non‐competitive space to foster collaboration and advance research, development and evaluation of medical devices.

Serve as a reference for access to state‐of‐the‐art CM&S and data related to medical products

Mechanism for FDA to transparently communicate utility and expectations of CM&S in a regulatory setting

Being a space for companies to share their “smaller datasets”, e.g., pediatric population, to create a “larger datasets”

13

2014

FDA Digital Library of M&S

Hosted public workshop in June 2013 to introduce       concept and openly discuss the Library

Developed key aspects of the infrastructure and framework for use of the Library

Anticipate initially that the Library will be used for curating DATA for creating models and validating simulations, and reference problems

Prototype is underway with sights on pilot in 2014

[email protected]

14

2014

Some of the challengeswith the current practice …

… have led us to address the need for:

methodologies to experimentally validate CM&S;  sensitivity analyses and uncertainty quantification; and

• CDRH is actively engaged with the ASME Verification & Validation Standards Committee

o ASME V&V 10 – Subcommittee on Solid Mechanicso ASME V&V 20 – Subcommittee on Fluid Dynamics and Heat Transfer

ASME V&V 40 – Subcommittee on CM&S for Medical Devices

better elicitation of the consequence of the CM&S being incorrect.• CDRH is getting ready to launch a pilot program to expand the 

current uses of CM&S in premarket submissions and to implement the Credibility Strategy

15

2014

Credibility Strategy Overview

16

2014

Risk Assessment

Establish Context of Use

CM&S Risk: combination of decision influence and consequence Decision Influence: contribution of 

CM&S outcome to the decision being made

Consequence: impact if the CM&S outcomes prove incorrect

Risk assessment• Directs/guides V&V activities• Defines model credibility thresholds

17

LOW

MEDIUM

HIGH

CONSEQUENCE

INFLUEN

CE

2014

Framework to Assess Credibility

Ensuring that the credibility of the CM&S is commensurate with the associated risk provides the confidence that the CM&S is appropriate for the intended COU

Multiple factors contribute to CM&S credibility:

18

Code Verification Sample Characterization

Solution Verification Control Over Test Conditions

System Configuration Measurement Uncertainty

System Properties Discrepancy of Inputs/Outputs

Boundary Conditions Rigor of Output Comparison

Governing Equations Applicability to Context of Use

2014

Applicability of V&V Activities

19

2014

Pilot Program at CDRH

CDRH is launching a pilot program this Spring to implement and evaluate the Credibility Strategy in the review of CM&S in premarket submissions• Collaboration with OSEL and ODE• Focus on Cardiovascular and Orthopaedic Devices

The Credibility Strategy will also be evaluated as part of the qualification process for the Medical Device Development Tool6 program

It will also be used to help determine which CM&S can be a part of the FDA Library of Models and Simulation

20

6, http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/DeviceRegulationandGuidance/GuidanceDocuments/ucm374427.htm

2014

Future Directions

Digital Patients Virtual Clinical Trials Personalized Medicine

FDANIH

INDUSTRY

ACADEMIA M&S

NSF

NIST

NASA

DARPA

MDIC

21

are being realized

2014

Acknowledgments

FDA Library of M&SDonna Lochner, OSELJames Coburn, OSELLeonardo Angelone, OSELJessica Hernandez, OSEL

Credibility Strategy Pilot TeamTina Morrison, ODEJames Coburn, OSELMaureen Dreher, OSELFinn Donaldson, OSELNandini Duraiswamy, OSELCasey Hanley, ODENicole Ibrahim, ODEMatt Myers, OSELSrin Nagaraja, OSELKatie O’Callaghan, OCDDavid Pudwill, ODEChangfu Wu, ODEZane Wyatt, ODE

Contact Information

[email protected]

Office of Device Evaluation, CDRH

ASME V&V40: Verification and Validation in Computational Modeling of Medical Devices