31C 165*88*9 2 .IC889 BlfftGESS

LODI METALS INC.

VANCOUVER, BRITISH COLOMBIA

010

INDUCED POLARIZATION SURVEY

TIMMINS MINE PROPERTY

10889

FEBRUARY 1988

MAR O? 1988

SAGAX 88273

31CI6SWW99 2.1*889 BIWGESS 01OC

TABLE OF CONTENTSPAGE

1. INTRODUCTION ..............................'............................................................... 3

2. SURVEY FRAMEWORK ..............,................................................................. 3

2.1 Localization and access

2.2 General geology

2.3 Survey grid

3. INDUCED POLARIZATION SURVEY ......,.................................................. 6

3.1 Generalities3.2 Electrode array3.3 Equipment3.4 Sources of difficulty and accuracy of measurement3.5 Data presentation

4. INTERPRETATION AND RECOMMENDATIONS ..................................... 9

5. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION .................................................................. 16

APPENDICES

Map scale 1:2400

A) Geophysical interpretation map

B) Metal factor contour map

C) Chargeability contour map

D) Resistivity contour map

1. INTRODUCTION

In agreement with Lodi Metals Inc., SAGAX Geophysics Inc. completed an induced polarization survey over the Timmins Mine property located south of Perth, Ontario. The purpose of the survey was to delineate graphite horizons of economical interest.

This report contains an outline of the survey method, a discussion of the results obtained from said survey, and recommendations pertaining to subsequent work on the property.

2. SURVEY FRAMEWORK

2.1 Localization and access

The property is situated some eighteen (18) kilometres south of the town of Perth, in the southwest q uadrant of North Burgess Township (NTS 31 C/16 and 31 C/9).

The property is accessible by paved and gravel roads west of Perth. Rural road # 3 traverses the north part of the property while road 3 is located to the immediate south of it. Road 14 traverses the western edge of the property.

2.2 General geology*

The rocks in the region belong to the Central Gneiss Belt of the Grenville Structural Province. The survey area is located between the Rideau Lake and Westport plutons.

lii

10

The property is principally underlain by Grenville metasediments (marble, para-amphibolite, rusty para-gneiss and quartzite) which are cut by granitic intrusions (granite and granitic pegmatites) interpreted as tectonic fingers from the Rideau Lake and Westport plutons. The two plutons are believed responsible for the precipitation of the carbon from the carbonates which formed the graphite.

* J.R. Goodwin (1987). Qualifying report on the Timmins Graphite Property in North Burgess Township, Lanark County, Ontario.

Figure 1: Location of the Timmins Mine property.

2.3 Survey grid

The mining claims which were partially or totally covered by the present survey'are:

Lot No Clajms Lot No Claims

23232424242425

EO748513EO748514EO840566EO840567EO840572EO840573EO748512

252525262626

- 26

EO840568EO840569EO840574EO748510EO748511EO840570EO840571

The property is entirely covered by an imperial network of survey lines and a base line. The azimuth of the base line is 650. The survey lines are spaced 400 feet apart and picketed every 100 feet.

Figure 2: Location of the survey area.

3. INDUCED POLARIZATION SURVEY

3.1 Generalities

A time domain induced polarization survey totalling 13.69 miles (22.04 kilometres) was completed between the 27th of January and the 5 th of February 1988. The field work was supervised by Miss H61ene Baril, geophysicist with SAGAX Geophysics Inc. Three (3) assistants rounded out the field crew.

3.2 Electrode array

The "in line" pole-pole array (figure 3) was used throughout the course of the survey. The nominal "a" spacing between the roving receiving electrode Pj and the roving transmitting electrode C l was fixed at 100 feet. Both the current electrode to ground C2 and the reference potentiel electrode P2 were never less than 1000 feet from either of the roving electrodes Cx and Pj. At least 2000 feet seperated C2 and P2 . The contribution of the "infinity" electrodes to the mesured signal could therefore be considered negligeable. Readings were taken at 100-foot intervals along the survey lines.

0=100 f t

NOOOflP,

Figure 3: The "in line" pole-pole electrode array.

3.3 Equipment

The induced polarization equipment consisted of pulse-type transmitter and receiver circuits. A stable current source was achieved using a Phoenix IPT-1 transmitter, which was powered by an MG-2 motor generator source capable of supplying a 2 kW continuous load. Stainless steel electrodes were used to inject the ground current. The commuted signal had a 8-second period and a 5007o duty cycle (figure 4).

- 2 sec.-

-e tec.-

Figure 4: The signal injected at Cj-C2.

Primary voltage (V ) and apparent chargeability (M) were mesured with an EDA Instruments Inc. IP-2 model time domain receiver. The transient voltage was integrated over four (4) time windows during the off-time (current off: see figure 5). The time transient decay channels having been normalized with respect to the standard induced polarization discharge curve, all other contributions (telluric noise, bad electrical contacts, etc.) to the transient voltage are detected (and discarded) by comparing the four (4) values mesured at the receiver. Stainless steel electrodes were also used at the receiver poles.

*Vp

-2000ms *

Figure 5: The four integration windows mesured at

3.4 Sources of difficulty and accuracy of measurement

The quality of measurement of the apparent chargeability and the apparent resistivity were closely monitored throughout the course of the field survey. Irregular readings, resulting from problems due to electromagnetic coupling, telluric noise, or poor electrode contacts, were retaken where necessary, thereby maintaining the quality of the data.

3.5 Data presentation

The values of apparent resistivity, apparent chargeability, and metal factor are presented in contour form at a map scale of 1:2400 and are appended to this report.

The approximate limits of the interpreted polarizable bodies are indicated on the interpretation map at the same map scale.

4. INTERPRETATION AND RECOMMENDATIONS

A total of twenty-six (26) well-defined anomalies were identified by the present survey. The approximate limits of these anomalies are indicated on the geophysical interpretation map. The parameters and priority for these anomalies are presented in table 1.

Generally, first priority anomalies require immediate action (drilling, complementary geophysical survey). The results of these actions will determine which type of subsequent work, if any, is to be performed on the second priority anomalies. Finally, third priority anomalies should be abandoned unless additional geoscientific information enhances their value. Several lesser anomalies displaying weak amplitude and/or limited strike length are shown on the interpretation map but are not described in table 1.

The majority of the anomalies trend N650E which is parallel to the base line. The exceptions are anomalies I, M, P, Q, X and Z which trend N450E while anomalies D and E trend E-W. A ll twenty-six (26) anomalies represent polarizable and conductive bodies which seem to be graphite-rich horizons with the noted exception of anomaly C probably caused by an artificial source (i.e. a power line).

The anomalies are classified in three priority groups as follows:

First priority anomalies: D, F, I, J, K, L, M, Q, S, U

These anomalies display strong amplitudes both in chargeability and conductivity.

Anomalies F, K, S and U are recommended as initial diamond drilling targets and should be the subject of immediate action. Anomalies J, M and Q are recommended as secondary diamond drilling targets. Action on these anomalies should not be undertaken until the results of the initial drilling are known. Anomalies D, I and L, located at the edge of the survey area, require a complementary induced polarization survey to better define the extension and the exact location of their source. In the case of anomaly D, the complementary survey should cover the area west of 12+OOW and north of 5+OON, while for anomalies I and L it should cover the area east of 24-fOOE and north of 3+OON.

After completing the two complementary induced polarization surveys, all three of these anomalies should be upgraded to immediate action diamond drilling targets as both anomalies D and I intercept known graphite occurrences. It should also be noted that anomaly I is probably the same graphite horizon identified by anomaly F which is slated for immediate drilling.

Second priority anomalies: B, G, H, P, R, W, X

These anomalies display weak to moderate amplitudes both in chargeability and conductivity.. These anomalies are interesting but require positive drilling results from the first priority anomalies before further work can be recommended.

Third priority anomalies: A, C, E, N, O, T, V, Y, Z

With the exception of anomaly C, probably caused by a power line, these anomalies are weak and, although of some interest, do not merit further investigation at the present time.

10

characteristics of the induced polarization anomalies

STRIKE EXTENSION

VARIATIONS IN CHARGEABILITY CONDUCTIVITY

COMMENTS AND/OR RECOMMENDATIONS

PRIORITY

8+OOEC?) to 16+OOEC?) Weak anomaly.

8+OOEC?) to 16+006(7) Moderate anomaly (strong value on line 12+OOE). Limited extension known. Probably due to graphite, further geophysical surveying (I.P.) required to define extension both to the east and to the west.

4*OOW(?) to 16+OOEO) Moderate anomaly possibly caused by a power line.

20*OOW(?) to 12+OOW Strong anomaly possibly extending to the northwest of the survey area. Known graphite zone. Further investigation recommended: I.P. survey covering the area west of 12+OOW and north of 5+OON to determine the extension of the anomalous zone.

24+OOWC?) to 16+OOW M-4- Weak anomaly possibly extending to the west(7). One strong value on line 16+OOW. Possibly some graphite but with no extension. Low priority anomaly.

24+OOWC7) to 4+OOW to to Moderate anomaly possibly extending to the west. Probably related to a graphite horizon known to occur in the area. Possibly the same horizon as anomaly I.DDK reconroended for the anomaly on line 12+OOW at station 2+50S.

B+OOW to 0+00 tO -M- Weak anomaly. Possibly an eastern extension of anomaly D. Await results of the comple mentary I.P. survey of anomaly D.

11

1: Characteristics of the induced polarization anomalies (continued)

STRIKE EXTENSION

VARIATIONS IN CHARGEABILITY CONDUCTIVITY

COMMENTS AND/OR RECOMMENDATIONS

PRIORITY

0+00 to 8+OOE to *** ** to *** Moderate anomaly of limited extension.Probably graphite. Possibly related to anomalies G and D. Further Investigation delayed till more information on anomaly D is obtained.

0+00 to 24+OOEC?) Moderate to strong anomaly possibly extending to the northeast of the survey area. Strongest value obtained at northeast edge of survey. High priority anomaly which requires further investigation. A complementary I.P. survey north of 3+OON and east of 24+OOE is recommended. DDK should be delayed till completion of subsequent I.P. survey.

20+OOW to 8+OOW to *** ** to *** Weak to moderate anomaly. Possibly samehorizon identified by anomalies K and M. Graphite identified nearby. Await results of DDK on anomaly K. Possible DDH for the anomaly on line 16+OOW at station 5+50S.

4+OOW to 4+OOE t+t Strong anomaly. Possibly an extension of anomalies J and H. Graphite horizon which merits further investigation. DDH recommended for the anomaly on line 0+00 at station 6+SOS.

32*OOE(?) to 36+OOE Strong anomaly at the edge of the survey area. Ill-defined. Complementary survey recommended for anomaly I applies here also. Anomalies I and L may be same graphite-rich zone. DDH should be delayed till completion of subsequent I.P. survey

12+OOE to 32+OOE to *** *** to M-++ Moderate anomaly, possibly same graphitehorizon as detected by anomalies J and K. Graphite exposed in the western portion of anomaly. Await results on DDH on anomaly K. Possible DDH for the anomaly on line 32+OOE at station 1+50S.

12

f; Characteristics of the induced polarization anomalies (continued)

STRIKE EXTENSION

VARIATIONS IN CHARGEABILITY CONDUCTIVITY

COMMENTS AND/OR RECOMMENDATIONS

PRIORITY

12+OOW to 4+OOW to Weak to moderate anomaly of limited extent. Possible extension of anomaly P. Possibly a graphitic horizon (small quantity of graphite).

16+OOW to 8+OOW to to Weak to moderate anomaly. Possibly same horizon as anomaly S.

4+OOE to 12+OOE Moderate to strong anomaly. Possible extension of anomaly N. Stronger amplitude than anomaly N. Possibly similar horizon as Q.

16+OOE to 32+OOE •f* tO tO Moderate anomaly with good extension. Known values of graphite identified by DDH. Possible extension of anomaly R. Possible DDH for the anomaly on line 32+OOE at station 2+50S If results on anomaly M are encouraging.

36+OOE to 48+OOEC?) tO tO Moderate to strong anomaly. Probably extends to the east of survey area. Possible extension of anomaly Q. Further work recommended depending on evaluation of anomaly Q.

0+00 to 20+OOE •M- tO Moderate to strong anomaly. Possibly extends to west (i.e. anomaly 0). Graphite horizon. DDH recommended for the anomaly on line 0+00 at station 13+50S.

12+OOWC?) to 4+OOW to *** Weak to moderate anomaly. Possibly small quantities of graphite.

A+OOW to 8+OOE to to Strong anomaly. Known graphite occurrence in proximity. DDH recomnended for the anomaly on line 0+00 at station 17+50S.

L13

Characteristics of the induced polarization anomalies (continued)

K STRIKE VARIATIONS -IN M EXTENSION CHARGEABILITY CONDUCTIVITY

K^^^^^-^:^^^^^^^™^^:

W 32+OOE to 40+OOE ** **Pg— ——————————————————————————————————— t 12+OOE to 40+OOE ** to *-f* *4 to **t

1" 28+OOE to 48-KDOE(?) ** to *t* ** to ***

f-i'

f 12+OOW to 4+OOW ** to *** ** to ***

8*OOW{?) to 12+OOE ** to *tt ** to ***

COMMENTS AND/OR RECOMMENDATIONS

Weak anomaly.

Weak to moderate anomaly. Further work delayed till results obtained on first priority anomalies.

Moderate anomaly. Possible extension to the east of the survey area. Further work delayed till results obtained on first priority anomalies.

Weak to moderate anomaly.

Weak to moderate anomaly.

PRIORITY

3

2

2

3

3

TABLE 2

SUBSEQUENT WORK

1) First priority drilling targets

Relative priority

1234

Anomaly

U K F S

Parameters

line station

0+00 17+50S0+00 6+50S12+OOW 2+50S0+00 13+50S

2) Second priority drilling targets

Relative priority Anomaly

567

J MQ

Parameters

line station

16+OOW 5+50S32+OOE 1+50S32+OOE 2+50S

3) Complementary induced polarization surveys

a) To better define the parameters of anomaly D, this survey should cover the area west of 12+OOW and north of 5+OON.

b) To better define the parameters of anomalies I and L, this survey should cover the area east of 24+OOE and north of 3+OON.

15

5. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION

An induced polarization survey was conducted by SAGAX Geophysics Inc. for Lodi Metals Inc. over their Timmins Mine property.

A total of twenty-six (26) valid anomalies were detected. Seven (7) promising drilling targets were selected from this total using all the available geoscientific information.

Recommendations and their relative priority may be modified as results of the initial drilling and the subsequent induced polarization surveys become available.

Respectfully submitted,

SAGAX Geophysics Inc.

Claude Deschambault, eng. Geophysicist

Pierre ^ Geophysicist l/

February 1988

16

/VI l

Mnist'yof Natural

yr Resources

Report of Work (Geophysical, Geological, Geochemical and Expenditures)

DOCUM

W880aiciesweeea a.ieesa BURGESS nn.^900

Claim Holder(s)

J T e yProspector's Licence No.

Aadress

Survey CompanyH

GEOPHYSICS / A/ c ,Date of Survey (from 61 to)^7 o t fig. I 6 a 8 6.Day l Mo. | Yr. | Day | Mo. | Yr.

Total Miles of line Cut

Name end Address of Author (of Geo-Technical report)

Credits Requested per Each Claim in Columns at rightSpecial Provisions

For first survey:

Enter 40 days. (This includes line cutting)

For each additional survey: using the same grid:

Enter 20 days (for each)

Man Days

air^rwfoM^!|\7prr

MAR -8 1itedAU 7,8|9,10,li,12,l,2,3,4

Airborne Credits -, *. c-

RECENote: Special provisions

credits do neiafVdly to AirborneSl/rveys.

Expenditures^!]^ IM

Geophysical

- Electromagnetic

- Magnetometer

- Radiometric

- Other

Geological

Geochemical

Geophysical

. - Electromagnetic

- Magnetometer

- Radiometric

M Other J,* T

5|6Geological

Geochemical

IVEDElectromagnetic

Days per Claim

Days per Claim

3j.i

Days per Claim

Ks^ r imping')'"t vos of Work Performed

i iM i3 C C f Ci PC J- rt ^ l "2 4 T 1 f A-Performed on Claim(s)

Calculation of Expenditure Days Credits •zf^^&f ~"5^^ Total

Total Expenditures /JT f̂ ^s' '-)avs Credits

T^jfy(/!*/ .5- ^ ^^^'T ^Instructions

Total Days Credits may be apportioned at the claim holder's choice. Enter number of days credits per claim selected in columns at right.

Date or Apent (Signature)

Certification Verifying Report of Work

Mining Claims Traversed (List in numerical sequence)Mining Claim

Prefix Number

85/0

567

Expend. Days Cr.

ONTARIO

Mining ClaimPrefix Number

G50LOG1CAL SURVEY ASSESSMENT FILUS

OFFICE

Jllljl 2 g 1988

R E Q E l V E P-S

Expend. Days Cr.

SOUTHcaWONJARIO-MIN NGSIW

/M -ra-

Total number of mining claims covered by this report of work.

i . /'Y

l hereby certify that l have a personal and intimate knowledge of the lacis set forth in fh'e Report of Work annexed hereto, having performed the wort, or witnessed same during and/or after its completion and the annexed report is true.

Name and Postal Address of Person Certifying

c L Ao c e Q /q (j L. T -ST-tC-V'-i rf j e r rt t" ^ i- /C-i*

e/Date Certified oy (Signature)

Assessment Work Breakdown

n Days are based on eight (8) hour Technical or Line-cutting days. Technical days include work performed consultants, draftsmen, etc.. ,

Type of Survey f iU O 0 C iT D PoL.A^IZ^Tfrf'V

x*

-V

Technical Technical Days Line-cutting Days Credits Days

G3 x 7 * */*// 4- 6

No. of Days per Total Credits Claims Claim

" My/ -i- f 1'J - 3 1. S

Type of Survey

Technical Days Credits

Line-cutting Days Total Credits

Ministry ofNorthern Developmentand Mines

Geophysical-Geological-Geochemical Technical Data Statement

ntario

TO BE ATTACHED AS AN APPENDIX TO TECHNICAL REPORTFACTS SHOWN HERE NEED NOT BE REPEATED IN REPORT

TECHNICAL REPORT MUST CONTAIN INTERPRETATION, CONCLUSIONS ETC.

Type of Siirvey(s) f t^L~ Ppi AT l Vif-^0Township or Area NtiR.7 K

Claim Holder(s) /.rift/ t r T A L. S rJC .MINING CLAIMS TRAVERSED

List numerically

Survey Company.v Author of Report ^-

&LO f HJS \tiJtl /A/'C.

SOV/? •J t- T

Address of Author jL 'f ' -bi "J IS ^r. f t UttifflL ,Covering Dates of Survey 2 7 /cV/tfg - - 2 k. /o i /S8

(tinecutting to office)

Total Miles of Line Cut ———.—.

SPECIAL PROVISIONS CREDITS REQUESTED

ENTER 40 days (includes line cutting) for first survey.ENTER 20 days for each additional survey using same grid.

Geophysical—Electromagnetic.—Magnetometer——Radiometric———Other——————

DAYS per claim

Geological.

Geochemical.

AIRBORNE CREDITS (Special provision credits do not apply to airborne surveys)

Magnetometer. .Electromagnetic(enter days per claim)

(prefix) (number)

i

DATE . 2 C lo i /S S ____________ l Author of Report or Agent

Previous Surveys File No. Type

837 (85/12)

GEOPHYSICAL TECHNICAL DATA

GROUND SURVEYS — If more than one survey, specify data for each type of survey

Number of Stations Station interval Profile scale

Number of Readings Line spacing ——-

Contour interval ^

uhH

H W ZO •^ 2

Instrument ——.———————————Accuracy — Scale constant —————— Diurnal correction method -————— Base Station check-in interval (hours). Base Station location and value ___

Instrument

ECTROMAGNETK Coil configuration .fViil separation

Accuracy,Method: CD Fixed transmitter CD Shoot back CD In line

Freciuencv.

CD Parallel line

Parameters measured.

O

Instrument.Scale constant.Corrections made.

Base station value and location.

Elevation accuracy.

57; Method S" Time DomainC fO f*""^™ POTTO TV* p t f 1"C lin tlTYl f* ^ —- *^-^ *

y y Off time ^. -5 f

^ ^ — Delay time /6 0 r^ 2 T . U ' OS — Integration time T* 'Si S3

C^3 ^? L^' ^7 j Q (.j Power ii A VA yU ^ * ^ Electrode array ——— 1 " V — L./ *U L —Q - y ,, X Z Electrode soacine . ,,,Ci^—i — / u O ——

L CC

ty^-nf. '/2C ,^ 7.0 , V26

" P t r fi

CD Frequency Domain FrequencyRange

820^i*e- -

LE:

Type of T /l L L | C

SELF POTENTIAL

Instrument^—-—--——-^———-——————————————.^——^———. Range.Survey Method ̂ ——-—————-——^—-————--——--————--—^—-————.——

Corrections made.

RADIOMETRICInstrument.Values measured.Energy windows (levels)——————————^————————^--——.——.————.——.Height of instrument—-^^—..—-^——.—-———^-——————.Background Count.Size of detector———————-—-—^———-^^——————.——————.—...—————-Overburden ——————^————-——————^^—.—-^—..—————^——.——-——

(type, depth - include outcrop map)

OTHERS (SEISMIC, DRILL WELL LOGGING ETC.) Type of survey———————————————————————Instrument ——^———————————.^^——...——

Accuracy————————————————————^^—Parameters measured.

Additional information (for understanding results).

AIRBORNE SURVEYS Type of survey(s)——— Instrument(s) —————

(specify for each type of survey) Accuracy————————————-.——

(specify for each type of survey) Aircraft used-^—-—^———————-——————————^———,——

Sensor altitude.Navigation and flight path recovery method.

Aircraft altitude______________________________Line Spacing—— Miles flown over total area—.—.-———-—————^——.————Over claims only.

GEOCHEMICAL SURVEY - PROCEDURE RECORD

Numbers of claims from which samples taken.

Total Number of Samples. Type of Sample.

(Nature of Material)Average Sample Weight-—————-

Method of Collection————————

Soil Horizon Sampled. Horizon Development- Sample Depth——™— Terrain————————

Drainage Development———————————— Estimated Range of Overburden Thickness.

ANALYTICAL METHODSValues expressed in: per cent

p. p. m. p. p. b.

D D D

Cu, Pb,

Others_

Zn, Ni, Co, Ag, Mo, As.-(circle)

Field Analysis (.Extraction Method. Analytical Method- Reagents Used——

Field Laboratory AnalysisNo. -————--.—-

SAMPLE PREPARATION(Includes drying, screening, crushing, ashing)

Mesh size of fraction used for analysis———.

Extraction Method. Analytical Method . Reagents Used.——

Commercial Laboratory (. Name of Laboratory— Extraction Method

Analytical Method —— Reagents Used————

.tests)

.tests)

.tests)

GeneraL General.

Ministry ofNorthern Development

nd MinesOntario

AssessmentWorkBreakdown

1. Type of Survey LOJ^JL....D.kfti^ JJ? ft

2. Township or Area -.A)MT.Jl....!S-U#.G.f

3. Numbers of Mining Claims Traversed by Survey

^^o.7.^-5L^.;.^a^.6^^.^.e.o.ay.9^i2'--;.EC 8VQ 570 l CO 8^6S7/ \ SO^yo5'7Z]

FlownU. N umber of Miles of Line Cut ----

*5. Number of Stations Established -

*6. Make and type of Instrument Used

*7. Scale Constant or Sensitivity ..rT..-....-..-.-....-.....---.-..........-....--.......-

*8. Frequency Used and Power Output Tj.^t E. ..^A/.^..^-^

^

9, Summary of Assessment Credits (details on reverse side)

Total 8 hour Technical Days (Include Consultants, Draughting etc.)

Total 8 hour Line-Cutting Days ...1711.-....-.----

Calculation

x 7 oTechnical Line-cutting Number

of claimsAssessment credits

per claim

The dates listed on this form represent working time spent entirely within the limitsof the above listed claims j M" CheckIf otherwise, please explain -..........-......-.----...........-.-..-....-......-....

Dated: Signed: ST

RECEIVED

Note: (A) * Complete only if applicaWeP ''(B) Complete list of names, addresses and dates on reverse side,(C) Submit separate brefflflflflt} IftRfc&gfcJftCH of survey.(D) Submit in duplicate.

Details of Assessment Work Breakdown

FIELD WORK

Type of Work Name 6t Address Dates WorkedNumber of 8 hour days

.) . ̂ -J-.'V .6'

i J^

C Ut

.

f f A*.

CONSULTANTS

Name 6 Address Dates Worked (specify in field or office)

it y fiUC^. . . . .

f '.^

7 '*

Number of 8 hour days

DRAUGHTSMAN. TYPING. OTHERS (specify)

Name (t Address Type of Work Dates WorkedNumber of 8 hour days

TOTAL 8 HOUR TECHNICAL DAYS

LINE- CUTTING

Name Address Dates WorkedNumber of 8 hour days

TOTAL 8 HOUR LINE-CUTTING DAYS

Ontario

Ministry o) Report of WorkNatural ,- . . . - . . , Resources (Geophysical, Geological,

Geochemical and Expenditures)

The Mining Act

Instructions: - Please type or print.-- If numhni of mining claims traversed

exceeds space on this form, attach a list.Note: Only days credits calculated in the

"Expenditures" section may be enteredin the "Expend. Days O." columns.

- Do not use shaded areas below.Type of Survey(s)

IN DU C k D . .../c. L fi f^l z,/? i /O

i CTflLs i / vi C .Claim Holder(s)

Township or Are

_Prospector'FLIcence No.

__Address

Survey Company

^-Name and Address of Author (of Geo-Technical report)

C L A o (i e DC S C // A '^ *6 '1 u ^T~

Date of Survey (from S to) 27 , C* fift- l 5 C2. ' Day [ Mo. J Yr. J Day | fyloj Yr. j

Total Miles of line Cut

S f - til-: "U/ 5 3 t , . HIS' Z A

Credits Requested per Each Claim in Columns at rightSpecial Provisions

For first survey:

Enter 40 days. (This includes line cutting)

For each additional survey: using the same grid:

Enter 20 days (for each)

Man Days

Complete reverse side and enter total (s) here

Airborne Credits

Note: Special provisions

to Airborne Surveys.

Geophysical

- Electromagnetic

- Magnetometer

- Radiometric

- Othor

Geological

Geochemical

Geophysical

- Electromagnetic

- Magnetometer

- Radiometric

- Other ,L\ l

Geological

Geochemical

Electromagnetic

Magnetometer

Radiometric

Days per Claim

... ..-..

Days per Claim

jT-T

Days por Claim

Expenditures (excludes power stripping)Type of Work Performed

iu k u c t D. f o i- n /C J '2 /l r iPerformed on Claim(s)

Calculation of Expenditure Days Credits

Total ExpendituresTotal

Days Credits

S/6 32. V .

InstructionsTotal Days Credits may be apportioned at the claim holder's choice. Enter number of days credits per claim selected n columns at right.

Date Recorded Holder or Agent (Signature)

Certification Verifying Report of Work

(vlining CJairns J reversed (List in numerical sequence)Mining Claim

Prefix

^0Number

/ty B5/0

vsb5: rl"~

7^/85/3

7^ B5"( V^6566

gV o 5675Vo 5G&

5V o .5'ci f8V05708V OS"?)8 '-/c 57 Z

r^;

Expend. Days Cr.

*

Mining ClaimPrefix

f ;;' k

NumberExpend. Days Cr.

Total number of mining i , claims covered by this /'-y report of work.

For Office Use OnlyTotal Days Cr. Recorded

Date Recorded

Date Approved as Recorded

Mining Recorder

Branch Director

l hereby certify that l have a personal and intimate knowledge of the fact? set forth in the Report of Work annexed hereto, having performed the work or witnessed same during and/or after its completion and the annexed report is true.

Name and Postal Address of Person Certifying ~r H 2. S

Date Certified (Signature)

1362 (81/9)

Assessment Woik Breakdown

Man Days are based on right (8) hour 1 echnicnl or Line cuttincj days. Technical days include work performed by '

consultants, draftsmen, etc..

Type of Survey

IfJ 0 (J C t"

Technical Days

63 x

D po L, /) # i i nTechnical Days

Credits

7 - \ {-t c/ y H

T 1 (? V

Line cutting No. of Days per Days total Cicdits Claims Claim

F 0 | "[ '/V 7 4- 1 V - 3/,^

_No. of Days per

lot.il Credits Claims Claim

-r r:

RECEIVED

JUN 13 1988

MINING LANDS SECTION

Montreal, May 16th 1988.

Lodi Metals Inc. Box 2Sharbot Lake ON KOH 2PO

ATTN: Mr Garth Hawley

Dear Mr. Hawley:

Please find enclosed a copy of the curriculum vitae of Pierre Conway and a copy of my curriculum vitae.

We also included a color copy of the induced polarization survey.

Regards,

C

Claude Deschambault, P. Eng. Geophysicist

/fdg

Enclosure

Mi*.629.3 .SW)n?ix, Montrtal, Qutbec, Canada 112S2R8

(514)271-3150

i f1 HERRE CONWAY

PERSONAL DATA

Date of birth: November 23, 1954

Marital Status: Single

Nationality: Canadian

Languages: English, French

EDUCATIONAL HISTORY

1978: Ecole Polytechnique de Montreal B, eng,, Geological Engineering Major: Applied Geophysics

AREAS OF INTEREST

Pierre Conway is involved in the interpretation of geophysical data and uses his engineering background to solve problems in applied geophysics for the area of mineral exploration. He has experienced a variety of geophysical methods both land and airborne and has personal interest in remote sensing as it pertains to geophysical exploration. Mr, Conway specializes in the compilation and reduction of data acquired from various types of survey in order to produce an overall view of mining properties.

it

LI1 ""

WORK EXPERIENCE

April 1987 - present:SAGAX Geophysique inc., Montreal, Quebec

Title; Geophysicist

Duties: Interpreting and writing the pertinenttechnical reports as regards to geophysical field surveys

Location: Montreal

Supervisor: Technical editor - Geophysicist (Paul Lortle)

May 1980 - June 1982:Saskatchewan Mining Development Corporation

Title: Geophysicist I

Duties: Planning and supervising geophysical surveys. Interpreting and reporting results. Involved in the development and application of new geophysical survey methods to exploration problems.

Locations: Uranium City, La Ronge, Saskatoon (Saskatchewan)

Supervisor: Senior geophysicist (Ron Matthews)

May 1979 - October 1979:Long Lac Mineral Exploration Limited

Title: Geophysicist

Duties: Gathering, evaluating and interpretinggeophysical data. Reporting on geophysical data as well as recommending further work (type - quantity - location)

Location: Malartic, Quebec

Supervisor: Project Leader (Robert Valiant)

k

FURTHER EXPERIENCE

May 1977 - September 1977:Societi de developpement de la Bale James

Title: Assistant (Junior)

Duties: Gathering, evaluating and interpreting ofairborne radiometric survey. Maintenance of equipment

Location: James Bay Territory

Supervisor: Group Leader (Pierre Larose)

PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATIONS

S.E.G.Ordre des ingenieurs du Quebec (O,I.Q.)

CLAUDE DESCHAMBAULT

PERSONAL DATA

Date of birth

Marital status

Nationality

Languages

February 11, 1961

Married

Canadian

French and English

EDUCATIONAL HISTORY

B.Se.A. Geological Engineering Universite Laval, 1984

M.Se.A. GeophysicsEcole Polytechnique, 1988

STUDY GRANTS

Noranda

FCAR

1981 - 1984

1984 . 1986

AREA OF EXPERTISE

Claude Deschambault is for the most part involved in the interpretation of geophysical data. He uses his engineering-geophysics background to attack problems in applied geophysics in the areas of mineral exploration and geotechnical studies. Mr. Deschambault's particular area of interest is the use of airborne geophysical data as an aid to geological mapping.

TECHNICAL REPORTS

DoBchambault, C., Chouteau, M,, 1986; Interpretation des Iov60 magn6tiques et gradiomtitriques aeroportes dans la region de Weedon, Quebec, Open file no, 1311, Geological Survey of Canada, 65 pages.

PRESENTATIONS AND SEMINARS

Deschambault, C,, Chouteau, M., 1986: Interpretation des levin magnetique* *t gradiomdtriques a6roport6s dans la region de Weedon, Cantons de I'Est, Qu4bac. Presented at the B8th annual congress of the Canadian Institute of Mines and Metallurgy, Montreal, and at the 54th ACFAS congress, Montreal.

Descharabault, C., 1985: Utilisation des isotopes B tables et non-radioge'niques du carbone pour determiner l'origin* du graphite, Seminar on stable and non-radioactive isotopes, Univerelt6 du Quebec a Montreal,

WORK HISTORY

1988: BAGAX G6ophysique inc., Montreal, Quebec

Title: Regional Director

- Coordination of teams for field surveys

- Training and supervision of personnel

- Administration of projects

- Verification and geophysical data processing

- Interpretation and writing of reports

1987: SAGAX GSophysique inc., Montreal, Quftbec

Title; Editor in charge - technical report*

- Management of the editing department

- Supervision of the computerized cartography department

- Interpretation of geophysical ground surveys (IP, MAG, EMH, VLF, seismic refraction) and writing of reports

1986; SAGAX Geophysique inc., Montreal, Quebec

Title: Geophysicist and project leader

- Supervision, execution, and interpretation of geophysical ground surveys in various regions of Quebec

Summer : Minister* de 1'Energie et de i Resources du 1986 Quebec, Quebec

Title! Geophysicist

- Research, compilation, and production of the complete repertory of geophysical works undertaken for the Ministere de 1'Energie et des Ressources du Quebec

- Comparisons between time domain and frequency domain in airborne electromagnetic technics

1985: Mineral Exploration Research Institute, Montreal, Quebec

Title; Geophysicist, research assistant

- Analysis and interpretation of aeromagnetic, ^radiometric, and VLF data for the Ueedon area, Eastern Townships, Qudbec

Summer t Ministere de 1'Energie et des Ressources du 1984 Quebec, Quebec

title: Geophysicist, crew chief

- Production of an inventory of all the airborne geophysical surveys flown by companies frow the private sector in Quebec, and supervision of the final publication

Summer : Ministere de 1'Energio et des Ressourcen du 1983 Quebec, Quebec

Title: Assistant geologist

- Regional and detailed mapping of economic graphite deposits in the Grenville province

- Interpretation of airborne (helicopter) REXHEM-m data

- Execution and interpretation of ground geophysical surveys

•w.. f

Summer : Rlocanex, Toronto, Ontario 1982

Title: Assistant geologist

- Mapping and prospecting for gold, copper and platinum In the Gasp* region of Quebec

- Supervision and execution of soil, stream, and rock geochemistry

- Responsible for magnetic and VLF surveys

Bathurst Twp.27 26 - 25 - 24 - 23 v 22

NORTH BURGESS

200 Bastard

THE TOWNSHIP OF

NORTH a SOUTH BURGESSCOUNTY OF

LANARK- LEEDSSOUTHERN ONTARIO

MINING DIVISION

SCALE : 1-INCH* 40 CHAINS

LEGENDPATENTED LANDCROWN LAND SALELEASESLOCATED LANDLICENSE OF OCCUPATIONROADSIMPROVED ROADSKING'S HIGHWAYRAILWAYSPOWER LINESMARSH OR MUSKEGMINING RIGHTS ONLYSURFACE RIGHTS ONLYMINES

© CS.

© Loc.L.U.

S.R.O.

NOTES

THIS MAP NOT TO BE USED —— FOR SURVEY PURPOSE—

All claims ore accepted subject to Section 53 o* Mining Ad

400* Surface Rights Reservation around oil takes

DATE OF ISSUE

i MAY - l 1383i l' SOUTHERN ONTARIO

MINING DIVISION

PLAN NO- M. 61OVTARIO

MINISTRY OF NATURAL RESOURCESA.Ni? MAKPING BRANCH

EO 8

40570

LEG

EN

D

Po

larisa

ble

an

d co

nduc

tive

sour

ce

Po

larisa

ble

a

rtific

ial

sour

ce

Sca

le

l ' 2

400

200

400

600

ft

2.

10

88

9

LO

DI

ME

TA

LS

IN

C.

Tl

MM

INS

M

INE

NO

RT

H

BU

RG

ES

S

TO

WN

SH

IP,

ON

T.

GE

OP

HY

SIC

AL

INT

ER

PR

ET

AT

ION

Surv

ey

by:

H

. B A

RIL

,

eng.

Inte

rpre

ted b

y.C

.DE

SC

HA

MB

AU

LT,

eng

Dat

e :

Ja

nua

ry ,

19

88

GE

OP

HY

SIC

S

INC

.

Re

l: S

AG

AX

88273

31C

16

SW

e0

09

2.1

0689

BU

RG

ES

S2

10

o 5 5

O s

;

is

IND

UC

ED

P

OLA

RIZ

AT

ION

S

UR

VE

Y

PO

LE

- P

OLE

"

In

line

" A

rray

0=10

0 f T

TM

'

'000 f

l P.

(PP

T'M

}

C,

>IO

OO

f!

Inst

rum

ents

: IPT

- l

from

P

HO

EN

IX (

tran

smitt

er)

IP-2

fro

m

ED

A

(rece

iver)

Tra

nsm

itted

sig

nal

:

•8 s

ec.—

——

Con

tour

in

terv

al

0.5

KA

-fT

Sc

ale

l :

24

00

20

020

0600

ft

2.

10

88

9

LO

DI

ME

TA

LS

IN

C.

TIM

MIN

S

MIN

E

NO

RT

H

BU

RG

ES

S

TO

WN

SH

IP,

ON

T.

PO

LE-

PO

LE "

in li

ne"

SU

RV

EY

AP

PA

RE

NT

R

ES

IST

IVIT

Y

CO

NT

OU

RS

(KX

l-ft

)

Su

rve

y by:

H

. B A

RIL

,

eng.

In

terp

rete

d b

y:C

,DE

SC

HA

MB

AU

LT,

erg.

Dat

e :

January

, 1988

GE

OP

HY

SIC

S

INC

.

31C

16S

WW

(S9

2.1

B6

89

B

UR

GE

SS

220

Re

f :

SA

GA

X

88

27

3

i

J/'

31C

16S

WW

09

2.1

08

89

B

UR

GE

SS

330

NDUCED PO

LARI

ZATI

ON SURVEY

PO

LE

-PO

LE

"i

n

line

" A

rray

tP

PT™

; a-

IOO

fTs

(OO

Of!P

, -—

——

——

——

——

——

——

——

l .1

——

——

——

——

——

——

-——

—"

C,

>IO

OO

fl

Inst

rum

ents

: I PT

- l

from

P

HO

EN

IX (

tran

smitt

er)

IP-2

fr

om

ED

A

(rece

iver)

Tra

nsm

itted

sig

nal

;

Con

tour

in

terv

al

:50

200

Scale

l

' 2400

O

20

0

400

600

ft

2.

1088

9

LO

DI

ME

TA

LS

IN

C.

Tl

MM

INS

M

INE

NO

RT

H

BU

RG

ES

S

TO

WN

SH

IP,

ON

T.

PO

LE

-PO

LE

"i

nlin

e" S

UR

VE

Y

ME

TA

L F

AC

TO

R

CO

NT

OU

RS

Su

rve

y by

: H

. BA

RIL

,

eng.

In

terp

rete

d ty

\C.D

ES

CH

AM

BA

ULT

, en

g.D

ate

: January

, 1

988

GE

OP

HY

SIC

S

INC

.

Ret: S

AG

AX

88273

2-1

*88

9

BU

RG

ES

S2-4

0

IND

UC

ED

P

OLA

RIZ

AT

ION

S

UR

VE

Y

PO

LE-

PO

LE

" in

lin

e "

Arr

ay

0=10

0 TT

•OO

Ofi

P.

Inst

rum

ents

: IPT

- l

from

P

HO

EN

IX (

trans

mitT

er)

I P-2

fr

om

ED

A

(re

ceiv

er)

Tra

nsm

itted

sig

nal

:

Con

tour

in

terv

al :

2 m

V/V

20

0

Sca

le

l ' 24

00

O 20

0 40

0600

ff

2, 1

0889

LO

DI

ME

TA

LS

IN

C.

Tl

MM

INS

M

INE

NO

RT

H

BU

RG

ES

S

TO

WN

SH

IP,

ON

T.

PO

LE-P

OLE

"i

nlin

e" S

UR

VE

Y

AP

PA

RE

NT

C

HA

RG

EA

BIL

ITY

C

ON

TOU

RS

(mV

/V)

Su

rve

y by

H

. B

AR

IL

, en

g.

Inte

rpre

ted b

y .C

.DE

SC

HA

MB

AU

LT,

eng

Dat

e '

Ja

nu

ary

, 1

98

8

GE

OP

HY

SIC

S

INC

.

Re

f :

SA

GA

X 88273