Through the eyes of the editor: nursing research

47
Through the eyes of the editor: Nursing reseach Roger Watson PhD, FRCP Edin, FAAN Editor-in-Chief, JAN Editor, Nursing Open Professionalism in nursing and Nursing management 2 nd National Nursing Management Conference Istanbul, Turkey 8-10 December 2016

Transcript of Through the eyes of the editor: nursing research

Page 1: Through the eyes of the editor: nursing research

Through the eyes of the editorNursing reseach

Roger Watson PhD FRCP Edin FAANEditor-in-Chief JAN

Editor Nursing Open

Professionalism in nursing andNursing management

2nd National NursingManagement Conference

Istanbul Turkey8-10 December 2016

Quality assurance in the publication processauthors editors reviewers publishers

Submission

Peer review

Editorial decision and input

Revision

Production

Publication

bull submission requirements based on international standards (eg ICMJE) re content ethics authorship etc

bull peer review (blind or open) bull reasons for rejection include

plagiarism redundancy sub-standard research faulty or incomplete analysis poor or incomplete reporting

bull revision (minor or major) aims to improve quality

bull further checks at production bull post-publication scrutiny (internal and

external)

Understand the publishing process

Write first for

bullEditors

bullReviewers

bullYour audience

The four rules of writing

Read the guidelines

Set realistic targets and count words

Seek criticism

Treat a rejection as the start of the next submission

Journal guidelines

Journal guidelines

Journal guidelines

Length

Layout

Organisation

Referencing system

Seeking criticism

Find a lsquocritical friendrsquo

Seek criticism of your writing

NOT THIS

OR THIS

THIS

Enhancing the QUAlity and Transparency Of health Research

Enhancing the QUAlity and Transparency Of health Research

CONSORT httpwwwconsort-statementorg

Enhancing the QUAlity and Transparency Of health Research

CONSORT httpwwwconsort-statementorg

PRISMA httpwwwprisma-statementorg

Promoting integrity in research publication

COPE httppublicationethicsorg

Authorship

International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) at httpwwwicmjeorg states authorship is based on

1) substantial contributions to the conception and design of a paper or acquisition of data or analysis and interpretation of data and

2) drafting the article or revising it critically for important intellectual content and final approval of the version to be published

Preventing Plagiarism in Published Works

International relevance

Keep asking yourself whether a reader in a region or country very different from your own will be able to make sense of everything in your paper

Abstract

bullrefer in the aims andor background to the global relevance of the topic

bullinclude names of countryies in which the work was undertaken

bullemphasise the international relevance of the conclusions

Expect to have several revisions

hellipIrsquom one of the worldrsquos greatest rewriters

James Mitchener

Learn when to let go

Dealing with reviewerrsquos comments

Apply the lsquogolden rulesrsquo (Williams 2004)

Rule 1 Answer completely

Rule 2 Answer politely

Rule 3 Answer with evidence

Answer completely

Deal with every point even if you donrsquot agree or canrsquot change it

Make a list of points ndash even if not presented with a list

Answer politely

Donrsquot start with

lsquoWe completely disagree with the comments of the reviewerrsquo

lsquoWho on earth are your reviewersrsquo

hellipetc

Answer with evidence

If you disagree with the reviewer then provide evidence facts and references

Do you feel like this

I just donrsquot get Twitter

The power of

Can Tweets Predict Citations Metrics of Social Impact

Based on Twitter and Correlation with Traditional Metrics of Scientific Impact

Gunther EysenbachJMIR (2011)Highly tweeted articles were 11 times more likely to be

highly cited than less-tweeted articles (912 or 75 of highly tweeted article were highly cited while only 343 or 7 of less-tweeted articles were highly cited rate ratio 075007 = 1075 95 confidence interval 34ndash336) Top-cited articles can be predicted from top-tweeted articles with 93 specificity and 75 sensitivity

Twitatio

ns

Twimpact

The odds of an article being highly cited were significantly increased by a mention in social media OR 258 plt0001

020523

Altmetrics

In scholarly and scientific publishing Altmetrics are new metrics proposed as an alternative to the widely used journal impact factor and personal citation indices like the h-index

(Wikipedia)

Beware of predatory journals

Edited by Karen Holland and Roger Watson

An invaluable guide on writing for publication enabling

the reader to develop skills in writing articles book reviews and other forms

of publications written by experts in the field

September 2012 288 pagesISBN

9780470657829pound1999 euro2590 $3295

Order online at wwwwileycomPrefer digital Visit your e-book retailer to order

Writing for Publication in Nursing and Healthcare

Getting It Right

bull High standard rigorous peer reviewbull Quality and reputationbull Immediate open accessbull Fully compliant with all open access mandatesbull Authors retain copyrightndasharticles publish under CC-BY license

Open access research in all aspects of nursingand midwifery practice research education and policy

EditorRoger Watson University of Hull

wwwnursingopenjournalcom

rwatsonhullacuk

0000-0001-8040-7625

rwatson1955

  • PowerPoint Presentation
  • Slide 2
  • Slide 3
  • Quality assurance in the publication process authors editors reviewers publishers
  • Slide 5
  • Slide 6
  • Slide 7
  • Slide 8
  • Slide 9
  • Slide 10
  • Slide 11
  • Slide 12
  • Slide 13
  • Slide 14
  • Slide 15
  • Slide 16
  • Slide 17
  • Slide 18
  • Slide 19
  • Slide 20
  • Slide 21
  • Authorship
  • Slide 23
  • Slide 24
  • Slide 25
  • Slide 26
  • Slide 27
  • Slide 28
  • Slide 29
  • Slide 30
  • Slide 31
  • Do you feel like this
  • Slide 33
  • The power of
  • Slide 35
  • Can Tweets Predict Citations Metrics of Social Impact Based on Twitter and Correlation with Traditional Metrics of Scientific Impact Gunther Eysenbach
  • Slide 37
  • Altmetrics
  • Slide 39
  • Slide 40
  • Beware of predatory journals
  • Slide 42
  • Slide 43
  • Slide 44
  • Writing for Publication in Nursing and Healthcare Getting It Right
  • Slide 46
  • Slide 47
Page 2: Through the eyes of the editor: nursing research

Quality assurance in the publication processauthors editors reviewers publishers

Submission

Peer review

Editorial decision and input

Revision

Production

Publication

bull submission requirements based on international standards (eg ICMJE) re content ethics authorship etc

bull peer review (blind or open) bull reasons for rejection include

plagiarism redundancy sub-standard research faulty or incomplete analysis poor or incomplete reporting

bull revision (minor or major) aims to improve quality

bull further checks at production bull post-publication scrutiny (internal and

external)

Understand the publishing process

Write first for

bullEditors

bullReviewers

bullYour audience

The four rules of writing

Read the guidelines

Set realistic targets and count words

Seek criticism

Treat a rejection as the start of the next submission

Journal guidelines

Journal guidelines

Journal guidelines

Length

Layout

Organisation

Referencing system

Seeking criticism

Find a lsquocritical friendrsquo

Seek criticism of your writing

NOT THIS

OR THIS

THIS

Enhancing the QUAlity and Transparency Of health Research

Enhancing the QUAlity and Transparency Of health Research

CONSORT httpwwwconsort-statementorg

Enhancing the QUAlity and Transparency Of health Research

CONSORT httpwwwconsort-statementorg

PRISMA httpwwwprisma-statementorg

Promoting integrity in research publication

COPE httppublicationethicsorg

Authorship

International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) at httpwwwicmjeorg states authorship is based on

1) substantial contributions to the conception and design of a paper or acquisition of data or analysis and interpretation of data and

2) drafting the article or revising it critically for important intellectual content and final approval of the version to be published

Preventing Plagiarism in Published Works

International relevance

Keep asking yourself whether a reader in a region or country very different from your own will be able to make sense of everything in your paper

Abstract

bullrefer in the aims andor background to the global relevance of the topic

bullinclude names of countryies in which the work was undertaken

bullemphasise the international relevance of the conclusions

Expect to have several revisions

hellipIrsquom one of the worldrsquos greatest rewriters

James Mitchener

Learn when to let go

Dealing with reviewerrsquos comments

Apply the lsquogolden rulesrsquo (Williams 2004)

Rule 1 Answer completely

Rule 2 Answer politely

Rule 3 Answer with evidence

Answer completely

Deal with every point even if you donrsquot agree or canrsquot change it

Make a list of points ndash even if not presented with a list

Answer politely

Donrsquot start with

lsquoWe completely disagree with the comments of the reviewerrsquo

lsquoWho on earth are your reviewersrsquo

hellipetc

Answer with evidence

If you disagree with the reviewer then provide evidence facts and references

Do you feel like this

I just donrsquot get Twitter

The power of

Can Tweets Predict Citations Metrics of Social Impact

Based on Twitter and Correlation with Traditional Metrics of Scientific Impact

Gunther EysenbachJMIR (2011)Highly tweeted articles were 11 times more likely to be

highly cited than less-tweeted articles (912 or 75 of highly tweeted article were highly cited while only 343 or 7 of less-tweeted articles were highly cited rate ratio 075007 = 1075 95 confidence interval 34ndash336) Top-cited articles can be predicted from top-tweeted articles with 93 specificity and 75 sensitivity

Twitatio

ns

Twimpact

The odds of an article being highly cited were significantly increased by a mention in social media OR 258 plt0001

020523

Altmetrics

In scholarly and scientific publishing Altmetrics are new metrics proposed as an alternative to the widely used journal impact factor and personal citation indices like the h-index

(Wikipedia)

Beware of predatory journals

Edited by Karen Holland and Roger Watson

An invaluable guide on writing for publication enabling

the reader to develop skills in writing articles book reviews and other forms

of publications written by experts in the field

September 2012 288 pagesISBN

9780470657829pound1999 euro2590 $3295

Order online at wwwwileycomPrefer digital Visit your e-book retailer to order

Writing for Publication in Nursing and Healthcare

Getting It Right

bull High standard rigorous peer reviewbull Quality and reputationbull Immediate open accessbull Fully compliant with all open access mandatesbull Authors retain copyrightndasharticles publish under CC-BY license

Open access research in all aspects of nursingand midwifery practice research education and policy

EditorRoger Watson University of Hull

wwwnursingopenjournalcom

rwatsonhullacuk

0000-0001-8040-7625

rwatson1955

  • PowerPoint Presentation
  • Slide 2
  • Slide 3
  • Quality assurance in the publication process authors editors reviewers publishers
  • Slide 5
  • Slide 6
  • Slide 7
  • Slide 8
  • Slide 9
  • Slide 10
  • Slide 11
  • Slide 12
  • Slide 13
  • Slide 14
  • Slide 15
  • Slide 16
  • Slide 17
  • Slide 18
  • Slide 19
  • Slide 20
  • Slide 21
  • Authorship
  • Slide 23
  • Slide 24
  • Slide 25
  • Slide 26
  • Slide 27
  • Slide 28
  • Slide 29
  • Slide 30
  • Slide 31
  • Do you feel like this
  • Slide 33
  • The power of
  • Slide 35
  • Can Tweets Predict Citations Metrics of Social Impact Based on Twitter and Correlation with Traditional Metrics of Scientific Impact Gunther Eysenbach
  • Slide 37
  • Altmetrics
  • Slide 39
  • Slide 40
  • Beware of predatory journals
  • Slide 42
  • Slide 43
  • Slide 44
  • Writing for Publication in Nursing and Healthcare Getting It Right
  • Slide 46
  • Slide 47
Page 3: Through the eyes of the editor: nursing research

Understand the publishing process

Write first for

bullEditors

bullReviewers

bullYour audience

The four rules of writing

Read the guidelines

Set realistic targets and count words

Seek criticism

Treat a rejection as the start of the next submission

Journal guidelines

Journal guidelines

Journal guidelines

Length

Layout

Organisation

Referencing system

Seeking criticism

Find a lsquocritical friendrsquo

Seek criticism of your writing

NOT THIS

OR THIS

THIS

Enhancing the QUAlity and Transparency Of health Research

Enhancing the QUAlity and Transparency Of health Research

CONSORT httpwwwconsort-statementorg

Enhancing the QUAlity and Transparency Of health Research

CONSORT httpwwwconsort-statementorg

PRISMA httpwwwprisma-statementorg

Promoting integrity in research publication

COPE httppublicationethicsorg

Authorship

International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) at httpwwwicmjeorg states authorship is based on

1) substantial contributions to the conception and design of a paper or acquisition of data or analysis and interpretation of data and

2) drafting the article or revising it critically for important intellectual content and final approval of the version to be published

Preventing Plagiarism in Published Works

International relevance

Keep asking yourself whether a reader in a region or country very different from your own will be able to make sense of everything in your paper

Abstract

bullrefer in the aims andor background to the global relevance of the topic

bullinclude names of countryies in which the work was undertaken

bullemphasise the international relevance of the conclusions

Expect to have several revisions

hellipIrsquom one of the worldrsquos greatest rewriters

James Mitchener

Learn when to let go

Dealing with reviewerrsquos comments

Apply the lsquogolden rulesrsquo (Williams 2004)

Rule 1 Answer completely

Rule 2 Answer politely

Rule 3 Answer with evidence

Answer completely

Deal with every point even if you donrsquot agree or canrsquot change it

Make a list of points ndash even if not presented with a list

Answer politely

Donrsquot start with

lsquoWe completely disagree with the comments of the reviewerrsquo

lsquoWho on earth are your reviewersrsquo

hellipetc

Answer with evidence

If you disagree with the reviewer then provide evidence facts and references

Do you feel like this

I just donrsquot get Twitter

The power of

Can Tweets Predict Citations Metrics of Social Impact

Based on Twitter and Correlation with Traditional Metrics of Scientific Impact

Gunther EysenbachJMIR (2011)Highly tweeted articles were 11 times more likely to be

highly cited than less-tweeted articles (912 or 75 of highly tweeted article were highly cited while only 343 or 7 of less-tweeted articles were highly cited rate ratio 075007 = 1075 95 confidence interval 34ndash336) Top-cited articles can be predicted from top-tweeted articles with 93 specificity and 75 sensitivity

Twitatio

ns

Twimpact

The odds of an article being highly cited were significantly increased by a mention in social media OR 258 plt0001

020523

Altmetrics

In scholarly and scientific publishing Altmetrics are new metrics proposed as an alternative to the widely used journal impact factor and personal citation indices like the h-index

(Wikipedia)

Beware of predatory journals

Edited by Karen Holland and Roger Watson

An invaluable guide on writing for publication enabling

the reader to develop skills in writing articles book reviews and other forms

of publications written by experts in the field

September 2012 288 pagesISBN

9780470657829pound1999 euro2590 $3295

Order online at wwwwileycomPrefer digital Visit your e-book retailer to order

Writing for Publication in Nursing and Healthcare

Getting It Right

bull High standard rigorous peer reviewbull Quality and reputationbull Immediate open accessbull Fully compliant with all open access mandatesbull Authors retain copyrightndasharticles publish under CC-BY license

Open access research in all aspects of nursingand midwifery practice research education and policy

EditorRoger Watson University of Hull

wwwnursingopenjournalcom

rwatsonhullacuk

0000-0001-8040-7625

rwatson1955

  • PowerPoint Presentation
  • Slide 2
  • Slide 3
  • Quality assurance in the publication process authors editors reviewers publishers
  • Slide 5
  • Slide 6
  • Slide 7
  • Slide 8
  • Slide 9
  • Slide 10
  • Slide 11
  • Slide 12
  • Slide 13
  • Slide 14
  • Slide 15
  • Slide 16
  • Slide 17
  • Slide 18
  • Slide 19
  • Slide 20
  • Slide 21
  • Authorship
  • Slide 23
  • Slide 24
  • Slide 25
  • Slide 26
  • Slide 27
  • Slide 28
  • Slide 29
  • Slide 30
  • Slide 31
  • Do you feel like this
  • Slide 33
  • The power of
  • Slide 35
  • Can Tweets Predict Citations Metrics of Social Impact Based on Twitter and Correlation with Traditional Metrics of Scientific Impact Gunther Eysenbach
  • Slide 37
  • Altmetrics
  • Slide 39
  • Slide 40
  • Beware of predatory journals
  • Slide 42
  • Slide 43
  • Slide 44
  • Writing for Publication in Nursing and Healthcare Getting It Right
  • Slide 46
  • Slide 47
Page 4: Through the eyes of the editor: nursing research

The four rules of writing

Read the guidelines

Set realistic targets and count words

Seek criticism

Treat a rejection as the start of the next submission

Journal guidelines

Journal guidelines

Journal guidelines

Length

Layout

Organisation

Referencing system

Seeking criticism

Find a lsquocritical friendrsquo

Seek criticism of your writing

NOT THIS

OR THIS

THIS

Enhancing the QUAlity and Transparency Of health Research

Enhancing the QUAlity and Transparency Of health Research

CONSORT httpwwwconsort-statementorg

Enhancing the QUAlity and Transparency Of health Research

CONSORT httpwwwconsort-statementorg

PRISMA httpwwwprisma-statementorg

Promoting integrity in research publication

COPE httppublicationethicsorg

Authorship

International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) at httpwwwicmjeorg states authorship is based on

1) substantial contributions to the conception and design of a paper or acquisition of data or analysis and interpretation of data and

2) drafting the article or revising it critically for important intellectual content and final approval of the version to be published

Preventing Plagiarism in Published Works

International relevance

Keep asking yourself whether a reader in a region or country very different from your own will be able to make sense of everything in your paper

Abstract

bullrefer in the aims andor background to the global relevance of the topic

bullinclude names of countryies in which the work was undertaken

bullemphasise the international relevance of the conclusions

Expect to have several revisions

hellipIrsquom one of the worldrsquos greatest rewriters

James Mitchener

Learn when to let go

Dealing with reviewerrsquos comments

Apply the lsquogolden rulesrsquo (Williams 2004)

Rule 1 Answer completely

Rule 2 Answer politely

Rule 3 Answer with evidence

Answer completely

Deal with every point even if you donrsquot agree or canrsquot change it

Make a list of points ndash even if not presented with a list

Answer politely

Donrsquot start with

lsquoWe completely disagree with the comments of the reviewerrsquo

lsquoWho on earth are your reviewersrsquo

hellipetc

Answer with evidence

If you disagree with the reviewer then provide evidence facts and references

Do you feel like this

I just donrsquot get Twitter

The power of

Can Tweets Predict Citations Metrics of Social Impact

Based on Twitter and Correlation with Traditional Metrics of Scientific Impact

Gunther EysenbachJMIR (2011)Highly tweeted articles were 11 times more likely to be

highly cited than less-tweeted articles (912 or 75 of highly tweeted article were highly cited while only 343 or 7 of less-tweeted articles were highly cited rate ratio 075007 = 1075 95 confidence interval 34ndash336) Top-cited articles can be predicted from top-tweeted articles with 93 specificity and 75 sensitivity

Twitatio

ns

Twimpact

The odds of an article being highly cited were significantly increased by a mention in social media OR 258 plt0001

020523

Altmetrics

In scholarly and scientific publishing Altmetrics are new metrics proposed as an alternative to the widely used journal impact factor and personal citation indices like the h-index

(Wikipedia)

Beware of predatory journals

Edited by Karen Holland and Roger Watson

An invaluable guide on writing for publication enabling

the reader to develop skills in writing articles book reviews and other forms

of publications written by experts in the field

September 2012 288 pagesISBN

9780470657829pound1999 euro2590 $3295

Order online at wwwwileycomPrefer digital Visit your e-book retailer to order

Writing for Publication in Nursing and Healthcare

Getting It Right

bull High standard rigorous peer reviewbull Quality and reputationbull Immediate open accessbull Fully compliant with all open access mandatesbull Authors retain copyrightndasharticles publish under CC-BY license

Open access research in all aspects of nursingand midwifery practice research education and policy

EditorRoger Watson University of Hull

wwwnursingopenjournalcom

rwatsonhullacuk

0000-0001-8040-7625

rwatson1955

  • PowerPoint Presentation
  • Slide 2
  • Slide 3
  • Quality assurance in the publication process authors editors reviewers publishers
  • Slide 5
  • Slide 6
  • Slide 7
  • Slide 8
  • Slide 9
  • Slide 10
  • Slide 11
  • Slide 12
  • Slide 13
  • Slide 14
  • Slide 15
  • Slide 16
  • Slide 17
  • Slide 18
  • Slide 19
  • Slide 20
  • Slide 21
  • Authorship
  • Slide 23
  • Slide 24
  • Slide 25
  • Slide 26
  • Slide 27
  • Slide 28
  • Slide 29
  • Slide 30
  • Slide 31
  • Do you feel like this
  • Slide 33
  • The power of
  • Slide 35
  • Can Tweets Predict Citations Metrics of Social Impact Based on Twitter and Correlation with Traditional Metrics of Scientific Impact Gunther Eysenbach
  • Slide 37
  • Altmetrics
  • Slide 39
  • Slide 40
  • Beware of predatory journals
  • Slide 42
  • Slide 43
  • Slide 44
  • Writing for Publication in Nursing and Healthcare Getting It Right
  • Slide 46
  • Slide 47
Page 5: Through the eyes of the editor: nursing research

Journal guidelines

Journal guidelines

Journal guidelines

Length

Layout

Organisation

Referencing system

Seeking criticism

Find a lsquocritical friendrsquo

Seek criticism of your writing

NOT THIS

OR THIS

THIS

Enhancing the QUAlity and Transparency Of health Research

Enhancing the QUAlity and Transparency Of health Research

CONSORT httpwwwconsort-statementorg

Enhancing the QUAlity and Transparency Of health Research

CONSORT httpwwwconsort-statementorg

PRISMA httpwwwprisma-statementorg

Promoting integrity in research publication

COPE httppublicationethicsorg

Authorship

International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) at httpwwwicmjeorg states authorship is based on

1) substantial contributions to the conception and design of a paper or acquisition of data or analysis and interpretation of data and

2) drafting the article or revising it critically for important intellectual content and final approval of the version to be published

Preventing Plagiarism in Published Works

International relevance

Keep asking yourself whether a reader in a region or country very different from your own will be able to make sense of everything in your paper

Abstract

bullrefer in the aims andor background to the global relevance of the topic

bullinclude names of countryies in which the work was undertaken

bullemphasise the international relevance of the conclusions

Expect to have several revisions

hellipIrsquom one of the worldrsquos greatest rewriters

James Mitchener

Learn when to let go

Dealing with reviewerrsquos comments

Apply the lsquogolden rulesrsquo (Williams 2004)

Rule 1 Answer completely

Rule 2 Answer politely

Rule 3 Answer with evidence

Answer completely

Deal with every point even if you donrsquot agree or canrsquot change it

Make a list of points ndash even if not presented with a list

Answer politely

Donrsquot start with

lsquoWe completely disagree with the comments of the reviewerrsquo

lsquoWho on earth are your reviewersrsquo

hellipetc

Answer with evidence

If you disagree with the reviewer then provide evidence facts and references

Do you feel like this

I just donrsquot get Twitter

The power of

Can Tweets Predict Citations Metrics of Social Impact

Based on Twitter and Correlation with Traditional Metrics of Scientific Impact

Gunther EysenbachJMIR (2011)Highly tweeted articles were 11 times more likely to be

highly cited than less-tweeted articles (912 or 75 of highly tweeted article were highly cited while only 343 or 7 of less-tweeted articles were highly cited rate ratio 075007 = 1075 95 confidence interval 34ndash336) Top-cited articles can be predicted from top-tweeted articles with 93 specificity and 75 sensitivity

Twitatio

ns

Twimpact

The odds of an article being highly cited were significantly increased by a mention in social media OR 258 plt0001

020523

Altmetrics

In scholarly and scientific publishing Altmetrics are new metrics proposed as an alternative to the widely used journal impact factor and personal citation indices like the h-index

(Wikipedia)

Beware of predatory journals

Edited by Karen Holland and Roger Watson

An invaluable guide on writing for publication enabling

the reader to develop skills in writing articles book reviews and other forms

of publications written by experts in the field

September 2012 288 pagesISBN

9780470657829pound1999 euro2590 $3295

Order online at wwwwileycomPrefer digital Visit your e-book retailer to order

Writing for Publication in Nursing and Healthcare

Getting It Right

bull High standard rigorous peer reviewbull Quality and reputationbull Immediate open accessbull Fully compliant with all open access mandatesbull Authors retain copyrightndasharticles publish under CC-BY license

Open access research in all aspects of nursingand midwifery practice research education and policy

EditorRoger Watson University of Hull

wwwnursingopenjournalcom

rwatsonhullacuk

0000-0001-8040-7625

rwatson1955

  • PowerPoint Presentation
  • Slide 2
  • Slide 3
  • Quality assurance in the publication process authors editors reviewers publishers
  • Slide 5
  • Slide 6
  • Slide 7
  • Slide 8
  • Slide 9
  • Slide 10
  • Slide 11
  • Slide 12
  • Slide 13
  • Slide 14
  • Slide 15
  • Slide 16
  • Slide 17
  • Slide 18
  • Slide 19
  • Slide 20
  • Slide 21
  • Authorship
  • Slide 23
  • Slide 24
  • Slide 25
  • Slide 26
  • Slide 27
  • Slide 28
  • Slide 29
  • Slide 30
  • Slide 31
  • Do you feel like this
  • Slide 33
  • The power of
  • Slide 35
  • Can Tweets Predict Citations Metrics of Social Impact Based on Twitter and Correlation with Traditional Metrics of Scientific Impact Gunther Eysenbach
  • Slide 37
  • Altmetrics
  • Slide 39
  • Slide 40
  • Beware of predatory journals
  • Slide 42
  • Slide 43
  • Slide 44
  • Writing for Publication in Nursing and Healthcare Getting It Right
  • Slide 46
  • Slide 47
Page 6: Through the eyes of the editor: nursing research

Journal guidelines

Length

Layout

Organisation

Referencing system

Seeking criticism

Find a lsquocritical friendrsquo

Seek criticism of your writing

NOT THIS

OR THIS

THIS

Enhancing the QUAlity and Transparency Of health Research

Enhancing the QUAlity and Transparency Of health Research

CONSORT httpwwwconsort-statementorg

Enhancing the QUAlity and Transparency Of health Research

CONSORT httpwwwconsort-statementorg

PRISMA httpwwwprisma-statementorg

Promoting integrity in research publication

COPE httppublicationethicsorg

Authorship

International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) at httpwwwicmjeorg states authorship is based on

1) substantial contributions to the conception and design of a paper or acquisition of data or analysis and interpretation of data and

2) drafting the article or revising it critically for important intellectual content and final approval of the version to be published

Preventing Plagiarism in Published Works

International relevance

Keep asking yourself whether a reader in a region or country very different from your own will be able to make sense of everything in your paper

Abstract

bullrefer in the aims andor background to the global relevance of the topic

bullinclude names of countryies in which the work was undertaken

bullemphasise the international relevance of the conclusions

Expect to have several revisions

hellipIrsquom one of the worldrsquos greatest rewriters

James Mitchener

Learn when to let go

Dealing with reviewerrsquos comments

Apply the lsquogolden rulesrsquo (Williams 2004)

Rule 1 Answer completely

Rule 2 Answer politely

Rule 3 Answer with evidence

Answer completely

Deal with every point even if you donrsquot agree or canrsquot change it

Make a list of points ndash even if not presented with a list

Answer politely

Donrsquot start with

lsquoWe completely disagree with the comments of the reviewerrsquo

lsquoWho on earth are your reviewersrsquo

hellipetc

Answer with evidence

If you disagree with the reviewer then provide evidence facts and references

Do you feel like this

I just donrsquot get Twitter

The power of

Can Tweets Predict Citations Metrics of Social Impact

Based on Twitter and Correlation with Traditional Metrics of Scientific Impact

Gunther EysenbachJMIR (2011)Highly tweeted articles were 11 times more likely to be

highly cited than less-tweeted articles (912 or 75 of highly tweeted article were highly cited while only 343 or 7 of less-tweeted articles were highly cited rate ratio 075007 = 1075 95 confidence interval 34ndash336) Top-cited articles can be predicted from top-tweeted articles with 93 specificity and 75 sensitivity

Twitatio

ns

Twimpact

The odds of an article being highly cited were significantly increased by a mention in social media OR 258 plt0001

020523

Altmetrics

In scholarly and scientific publishing Altmetrics are new metrics proposed as an alternative to the widely used journal impact factor and personal citation indices like the h-index

(Wikipedia)

Beware of predatory journals

Edited by Karen Holland and Roger Watson

An invaluable guide on writing for publication enabling

the reader to develop skills in writing articles book reviews and other forms

of publications written by experts in the field

September 2012 288 pagesISBN

9780470657829pound1999 euro2590 $3295

Order online at wwwwileycomPrefer digital Visit your e-book retailer to order

Writing for Publication in Nursing and Healthcare

Getting It Right

bull High standard rigorous peer reviewbull Quality and reputationbull Immediate open accessbull Fully compliant with all open access mandatesbull Authors retain copyrightndasharticles publish under CC-BY license

Open access research in all aspects of nursingand midwifery practice research education and policy

EditorRoger Watson University of Hull

wwwnursingopenjournalcom

rwatsonhullacuk

0000-0001-8040-7625

rwatson1955

  • PowerPoint Presentation
  • Slide 2
  • Slide 3
  • Quality assurance in the publication process authors editors reviewers publishers
  • Slide 5
  • Slide 6
  • Slide 7
  • Slide 8
  • Slide 9
  • Slide 10
  • Slide 11
  • Slide 12
  • Slide 13
  • Slide 14
  • Slide 15
  • Slide 16
  • Slide 17
  • Slide 18
  • Slide 19
  • Slide 20
  • Slide 21
  • Authorship
  • Slide 23
  • Slide 24
  • Slide 25
  • Slide 26
  • Slide 27
  • Slide 28
  • Slide 29
  • Slide 30
  • Slide 31
  • Do you feel like this
  • Slide 33
  • The power of
  • Slide 35
  • Can Tweets Predict Citations Metrics of Social Impact Based on Twitter and Correlation with Traditional Metrics of Scientific Impact Gunther Eysenbach
  • Slide 37
  • Altmetrics
  • Slide 39
  • Slide 40
  • Beware of predatory journals
  • Slide 42
  • Slide 43
  • Slide 44
  • Writing for Publication in Nursing and Healthcare Getting It Right
  • Slide 46
  • Slide 47
Page 7: Through the eyes of the editor: nursing research

Seeking criticism

Find a lsquocritical friendrsquo

Seek criticism of your writing

NOT THIS

OR THIS

THIS

Enhancing the QUAlity and Transparency Of health Research

Enhancing the QUAlity and Transparency Of health Research

CONSORT httpwwwconsort-statementorg

Enhancing the QUAlity and Transparency Of health Research

CONSORT httpwwwconsort-statementorg

PRISMA httpwwwprisma-statementorg

Promoting integrity in research publication

COPE httppublicationethicsorg

Authorship

International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) at httpwwwicmjeorg states authorship is based on

1) substantial contributions to the conception and design of a paper or acquisition of data or analysis and interpretation of data and

2) drafting the article or revising it critically for important intellectual content and final approval of the version to be published

Preventing Plagiarism in Published Works

International relevance

Keep asking yourself whether a reader in a region or country very different from your own will be able to make sense of everything in your paper

Abstract

bullrefer in the aims andor background to the global relevance of the topic

bullinclude names of countryies in which the work was undertaken

bullemphasise the international relevance of the conclusions

Expect to have several revisions

hellipIrsquom one of the worldrsquos greatest rewriters

James Mitchener

Learn when to let go

Dealing with reviewerrsquos comments

Apply the lsquogolden rulesrsquo (Williams 2004)

Rule 1 Answer completely

Rule 2 Answer politely

Rule 3 Answer with evidence

Answer completely

Deal with every point even if you donrsquot agree or canrsquot change it

Make a list of points ndash even if not presented with a list

Answer politely

Donrsquot start with

lsquoWe completely disagree with the comments of the reviewerrsquo

lsquoWho on earth are your reviewersrsquo

hellipetc

Answer with evidence

If you disagree with the reviewer then provide evidence facts and references

Do you feel like this

I just donrsquot get Twitter

The power of

Can Tweets Predict Citations Metrics of Social Impact

Based on Twitter and Correlation with Traditional Metrics of Scientific Impact

Gunther EysenbachJMIR (2011)Highly tweeted articles were 11 times more likely to be

highly cited than less-tweeted articles (912 or 75 of highly tweeted article were highly cited while only 343 or 7 of less-tweeted articles were highly cited rate ratio 075007 = 1075 95 confidence interval 34ndash336) Top-cited articles can be predicted from top-tweeted articles with 93 specificity and 75 sensitivity

Twitatio

ns

Twimpact

The odds of an article being highly cited were significantly increased by a mention in social media OR 258 plt0001

020523

Altmetrics

In scholarly and scientific publishing Altmetrics are new metrics proposed as an alternative to the widely used journal impact factor and personal citation indices like the h-index

(Wikipedia)

Beware of predatory journals

Edited by Karen Holland and Roger Watson

An invaluable guide on writing for publication enabling

the reader to develop skills in writing articles book reviews and other forms

of publications written by experts in the field

September 2012 288 pagesISBN

9780470657829pound1999 euro2590 $3295

Order online at wwwwileycomPrefer digital Visit your e-book retailer to order

Writing for Publication in Nursing and Healthcare

Getting It Right

bull High standard rigorous peer reviewbull Quality and reputationbull Immediate open accessbull Fully compliant with all open access mandatesbull Authors retain copyrightndasharticles publish under CC-BY license

Open access research in all aspects of nursingand midwifery practice research education and policy

EditorRoger Watson University of Hull

wwwnursingopenjournalcom

rwatsonhullacuk

0000-0001-8040-7625

rwatson1955

  • PowerPoint Presentation
  • Slide 2
  • Slide 3
  • Quality assurance in the publication process authors editors reviewers publishers
  • Slide 5
  • Slide 6
  • Slide 7
  • Slide 8
  • Slide 9
  • Slide 10
  • Slide 11
  • Slide 12
  • Slide 13
  • Slide 14
  • Slide 15
  • Slide 16
  • Slide 17
  • Slide 18
  • Slide 19
  • Slide 20
  • Slide 21
  • Authorship
  • Slide 23
  • Slide 24
  • Slide 25
  • Slide 26
  • Slide 27
  • Slide 28
  • Slide 29
  • Slide 30
  • Slide 31
  • Do you feel like this
  • Slide 33
  • The power of
  • Slide 35
  • Can Tweets Predict Citations Metrics of Social Impact Based on Twitter and Correlation with Traditional Metrics of Scientific Impact Gunther Eysenbach
  • Slide 37
  • Altmetrics
  • Slide 39
  • Slide 40
  • Beware of predatory journals
  • Slide 42
  • Slide 43
  • Slide 44
  • Writing for Publication in Nursing and Healthcare Getting It Right
  • Slide 46
  • Slide 47
Page 8: Through the eyes of the editor: nursing research

Seek criticism of your writing

NOT THIS

OR THIS

THIS

Enhancing the QUAlity and Transparency Of health Research

Enhancing the QUAlity and Transparency Of health Research

CONSORT httpwwwconsort-statementorg

Enhancing the QUAlity and Transparency Of health Research

CONSORT httpwwwconsort-statementorg

PRISMA httpwwwprisma-statementorg

Promoting integrity in research publication

COPE httppublicationethicsorg

Authorship

International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) at httpwwwicmjeorg states authorship is based on

1) substantial contributions to the conception and design of a paper or acquisition of data or analysis and interpretation of data and

2) drafting the article or revising it critically for important intellectual content and final approval of the version to be published

Preventing Plagiarism in Published Works

International relevance

Keep asking yourself whether a reader in a region or country very different from your own will be able to make sense of everything in your paper

Abstract

bullrefer in the aims andor background to the global relevance of the topic

bullinclude names of countryies in which the work was undertaken

bullemphasise the international relevance of the conclusions

Expect to have several revisions

hellipIrsquom one of the worldrsquos greatest rewriters

James Mitchener

Learn when to let go

Dealing with reviewerrsquos comments

Apply the lsquogolden rulesrsquo (Williams 2004)

Rule 1 Answer completely

Rule 2 Answer politely

Rule 3 Answer with evidence

Answer completely

Deal with every point even if you donrsquot agree or canrsquot change it

Make a list of points ndash even if not presented with a list

Answer politely

Donrsquot start with

lsquoWe completely disagree with the comments of the reviewerrsquo

lsquoWho on earth are your reviewersrsquo

hellipetc

Answer with evidence

If you disagree with the reviewer then provide evidence facts and references

Do you feel like this

I just donrsquot get Twitter

The power of

Can Tweets Predict Citations Metrics of Social Impact

Based on Twitter and Correlation with Traditional Metrics of Scientific Impact

Gunther EysenbachJMIR (2011)Highly tweeted articles were 11 times more likely to be

highly cited than less-tweeted articles (912 or 75 of highly tweeted article were highly cited while only 343 or 7 of less-tweeted articles were highly cited rate ratio 075007 = 1075 95 confidence interval 34ndash336) Top-cited articles can be predicted from top-tweeted articles with 93 specificity and 75 sensitivity

Twitatio

ns

Twimpact

The odds of an article being highly cited were significantly increased by a mention in social media OR 258 plt0001

020523

Altmetrics

In scholarly and scientific publishing Altmetrics are new metrics proposed as an alternative to the widely used journal impact factor and personal citation indices like the h-index

(Wikipedia)

Beware of predatory journals

Edited by Karen Holland and Roger Watson

An invaluable guide on writing for publication enabling

the reader to develop skills in writing articles book reviews and other forms

of publications written by experts in the field

September 2012 288 pagesISBN

9780470657829pound1999 euro2590 $3295

Order online at wwwwileycomPrefer digital Visit your e-book retailer to order

Writing for Publication in Nursing and Healthcare

Getting It Right

bull High standard rigorous peer reviewbull Quality and reputationbull Immediate open accessbull Fully compliant with all open access mandatesbull Authors retain copyrightndasharticles publish under CC-BY license

Open access research in all aspects of nursingand midwifery practice research education and policy

EditorRoger Watson University of Hull

wwwnursingopenjournalcom

rwatsonhullacuk

0000-0001-8040-7625

rwatson1955

  • PowerPoint Presentation
  • Slide 2
  • Slide 3
  • Quality assurance in the publication process authors editors reviewers publishers
  • Slide 5
  • Slide 6
  • Slide 7
  • Slide 8
  • Slide 9
  • Slide 10
  • Slide 11
  • Slide 12
  • Slide 13
  • Slide 14
  • Slide 15
  • Slide 16
  • Slide 17
  • Slide 18
  • Slide 19
  • Slide 20
  • Slide 21
  • Authorship
  • Slide 23
  • Slide 24
  • Slide 25
  • Slide 26
  • Slide 27
  • Slide 28
  • Slide 29
  • Slide 30
  • Slide 31
  • Do you feel like this
  • Slide 33
  • The power of
  • Slide 35
  • Can Tweets Predict Citations Metrics of Social Impact Based on Twitter and Correlation with Traditional Metrics of Scientific Impact Gunther Eysenbach
  • Slide 37
  • Altmetrics
  • Slide 39
  • Slide 40
  • Beware of predatory journals
  • Slide 42
  • Slide 43
  • Slide 44
  • Writing for Publication in Nursing and Healthcare Getting It Right
  • Slide 46
  • Slide 47
Page 9: Through the eyes of the editor: nursing research

Enhancing the QUAlity and Transparency Of health Research

Enhancing the QUAlity and Transparency Of health Research

CONSORT httpwwwconsort-statementorg

Enhancing the QUAlity and Transparency Of health Research

CONSORT httpwwwconsort-statementorg

PRISMA httpwwwprisma-statementorg

Promoting integrity in research publication

COPE httppublicationethicsorg

Authorship

International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) at httpwwwicmjeorg states authorship is based on

1) substantial contributions to the conception and design of a paper or acquisition of data or analysis and interpretation of data and

2) drafting the article or revising it critically for important intellectual content and final approval of the version to be published

Preventing Plagiarism in Published Works

International relevance

Keep asking yourself whether a reader in a region or country very different from your own will be able to make sense of everything in your paper

Abstract

bullrefer in the aims andor background to the global relevance of the topic

bullinclude names of countryies in which the work was undertaken

bullemphasise the international relevance of the conclusions

Expect to have several revisions

hellipIrsquom one of the worldrsquos greatest rewriters

James Mitchener

Learn when to let go

Dealing with reviewerrsquos comments

Apply the lsquogolden rulesrsquo (Williams 2004)

Rule 1 Answer completely

Rule 2 Answer politely

Rule 3 Answer with evidence

Answer completely

Deal with every point even if you donrsquot agree or canrsquot change it

Make a list of points ndash even if not presented with a list

Answer politely

Donrsquot start with

lsquoWe completely disagree with the comments of the reviewerrsquo

lsquoWho on earth are your reviewersrsquo

hellipetc

Answer with evidence

If you disagree with the reviewer then provide evidence facts and references

Do you feel like this

I just donrsquot get Twitter

The power of

Can Tweets Predict Citations Metrics of Social Impact

Based on Twitter and Correlation with Traditional Metrics of Scientific Impact

Gunther EysenbachJMIR (2011)Highly tweeted articles were 11 times more likely to be

highly cited than less-tweeted articles (912 or 75 of highly tweeted article were highly cited while only 343 or 7 of less-tweeted articles were highly cited rate ratio 075007 = 1075 95 confidence interval 34ndash336) Top-cited articles can be predicted from top-tweeted articles with 93 specificity and 75 sensitivity

Twitatio

ns

Twimpact

The odds of an article being highly cited were significantly increased by a mention in social media OR 258 plt0001

020523

Altmetrics

In scholarly and scientific publishing Altmetrics are new metrics proposed as an alternative to the widely used journal impact factor and personal citation indices like the h-index

(Wikipedia)

Beware of predatory journals

Edited by Karen Holland and Roger Watson

An invaluable guide on writing for publication enabling

the reader to develop skills in writing articles book reviews and other forms

of publications written by experts in the field

September 2012 288 pagesISBN

9780470657829pound1999 euro2590 $3295

Order online at wwwwileycomPrefer digital Visit your e-book retailer to order

Writing for Publication in Nursing and Healthcare

Getting It Right

bull High standard rigorous peer reviewbull Quality and reputationbull Immediate open accessbull Fully compliant with all open access mandatesbull Authors retain copyrightndasharticles publish under CC-BY license

Open access research in all aspects of nursingand midwifery practice research education and policy

EditorRoger Watson University of Hull

wwwnursingopenjournalcom

rwatsonhullacuk

0000-0001-8040-7625

rwatson1955

  • PowerPoint Presentation
  • Slide 2
  • Slide 3
  • Quality assurance in the publication process authors editors reviewers publishers
  • Slide 5
  • Slide 6
  • Slide 7
  • Slide 8
  • Slide 9
  • Slide 10
  • Slide 11
  • Slide 12
  • Slide 13
  • Slide 14
  • Slide 15
  • Slide 16
  • Slide 17
  • Slide 18
  • Slide 19
  • Slide 20
  • Slide 21
  • Authorship
  • Slide 23
  • Slide 24
  • Slide 25
  • Slide 26
  • Slide 27
  • Slide 28
  • Slide 29
  • Slide 30
  • Slide 31
  • Do you feel like this
  • Slide 33
  • The power of
  • Slide 35
  • Can Tweets Predict Citations Metrics of Social Impact Based on Twitter and Correlation with Traditional Metrics of Scientific Impact Gunther Eysenbach
  • Slide 37
  • Altmetrics
  • Slide 39
  • Slide 40
  • Beware of predatory journals
  • Slide 42
  • Slide 43
  • Slide 44
  • Writing for Publication in Nursing and Healthcare Getting It Right
  • Slide 46
  • Slide 47
Page 10: Through the eyes of the editor: nursing research

Enhancing the QUAlity and Transparency Of health Research

CONSORT httpwwwconsort-statementorg

Enhancing the QUAlity and Transparency Of health Research

CONSORT httpwwwconsort-statementorg

PRISMA httpwwwprisma-statementorg

Promoting integrity in research publication

COPE httppublicationethicsorg

Authorship

International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) at httpwwwicmjeorg states authorship is based on

1) substantial contributions to the conception and design of a paper or acquisition of data or analysis and interpretation of data and

2) drafting the article or revising it critically for important intellectual content and final approval of the version to be published

Preventing Plagiarism in Published Works

International relevance

Keep asking yourself whether a reader in a region or country very different from your own will be able to make sense of everything in your paper

Abstract

bullrefer in the aims andor background to the global relevance of the topic

bullinclude names of countryies in which the work was undertaken

bullemphasise the international relevance of the conclusions

Expect to have several revisions

hellipIrsquom one of the worldrsquos greatest rewriters

James Mitchener

Learn when to let go

Dealing with reviewerrsquos comments

Apply the lsquogolden rulesrsquo (Williams 2004)

Rule 1 Answer completely

Rule 2 Answer politely

Rule 3 Answer with evidence

Answer completely

Deal with every point even if you donrsquot agree or canrsquot change it

Make a list of points ndash even if not presented with a list

Answer politely

Donrsquot start with

lsquoWe completely disagree with the comments of the reviewerrsquo

lsquoWho on earth are your reviewersrsquo

hellipetc

Answer with evidence

If you disagree with the reviewer then provide evidence facts and references

Do you feel like this

I just donrsquot get Twitter

The power of

Can Tweets Predict Citations Metrics of Social Impact

Based on Twitter and Correlation with Traditional Metrics of Scientific Impact

Gunther EysenbachJMIR (2011)Highly tweeted articles were 11 times more likely to be

highly cited than less-tweeted articles (912 or 75 of highly tweeted article were highly cited while only 343 or 7 of less-tweeted articles were highly cited rate ratio 075007 = 1075 95 confidence interval 34ndash336) Top-cited articles can be predicted from top-tweeted articles with 93 specificity and 75 sensitivity

Twitatio

ns

Twimpact

The odds of an article being highly cited were significantly increased by a mention in social media OR 258 plt0001

020523

Altmetrics

In scholarly and scientific publishing Altmetrics are new metrics proposed as an alternative to the widely used journal impact factor and personal citation indices like the h-index

(Wikipedia)

Beware of predatory journals

Edited by Karen Holland and Roger Watson

An invaluable guide on writing for publication enabling

the reader to develop skills in writing articles book reviews and other forms

of publications written by experts in the field

September 2012 288 pagesISBN

9780470657829pound1999 euro2590 $3295

Order online at wwwwileycomPrefer digital Visit your e-book retailer to order

Writing for Publication in Nursing and Healthcare

Getting It Right

bull High standard rigorous peer reviewbull Quality and reputationbull Immediate open accessbull Fully compliant with all open access mandatesbull Authors retain copyrightndasharticles publish under CC-BY license

Open access research in all aspects of nursingand midwifery practice research education and policy

EditorRoger Watson University of Hull

wwwnursingopenjournalcom

rwatsonhullacuk

0000-0001-8040-7625

rwatson1955

  • PowerPoint Presentation
  • Slide 2
  • Slide 3
  • Quality assurance in the publication process authors editors reviewers publishers
  • Slide 5
  • Slide 6
  • Slide 7
  • Slide 8
  • Slide 9
  • Slide 10
  • Slide 11
  • Slide 12
  • Slide 13
  • Slide 14
  • Slide 15
  • Slide 16
  • Slide 17
  • Slide 18
  • Slide 19
  • Slide 20
  • Slide 21
  • Authorship
  • Slide 23
  • Slide 24
  • Slide 25
  • Slide 26
  • Slide 27
  • Slide 28
  • Slide 29
  • Slide 30
  • Slide 31
  • Do you feel like this
  • Slide 33
  • The power of
  • Slide 35
  • Can Tweets Predict Citations Metrics of Social Impact Based on Twitter and Correlation with Traditional Metrics of Scientific Impact Gunther Eysenbach
  • Slide 37
  • Altmetrics
  • Slide 39
  • Slide 40
  • Beware of predatory journals
  • Slide 42
  • Slide 43
  • Slide 44
  • Writing for Publication in Nursing and Healthcare Getting It Right
  • Slide 46
  • Slide 47
Page 11: Through the eyes of the editor: nursing research

Enhancing the QUAlity and Transparency Of health Research

CONSORT httpwwwconsort-statementorg

PRISMA httpwwwprisma-statementorg

Promoting integrity in research publication

COPE httppublicationethicsorg

Authorship

International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) at httpwwwicmjeorg states authorship is based on

1) substantial contributions to the conception and design of a paper or acquisition of data or analysis and interpretation of data and

2) drafting the article or revising it critically for important intellectual content and final approval of the version to be published

Preventing Plagiarism in Published Works

International relevance

Keep asking yourself whether a reader in a region or country very different from your own will be able to make sense of everything in your paper

Abstract

bullrefer in the aims andor background to the global relevance of the topic

bullinclude names of countryies in which the work was undertaken

bullemphasise the international relevance of the conclusions

Expect to have several revisions

hellipIrsquom one of the worldrsquos greatest rewriters

James Mitchener

Learn when to let go

Dealing with reviewerrsquos comments

Apply the lsquogolden rulesrsquo (Williams 2004)

Rule 1 Answer completely

Rule 2 Answer politely

Rule 3 Answer with evidence

Answer completely

Deal with every point even if you donrsquot agree or canrsquot change it

Make a list of points ndash even if not presented with a list

Answer politely

Donrsquot start with

lsquoWe completely disagree with the comments of the reviewerrsquo

lsquoWho on earth are your reviewersrsquo

hellipetc

Answer with evidence

If you disagree with the reviewer then provide evidence facts and references

Do you feel like this

I just donrsquot get Twitter

The power of

Can Tweets Predict Citations Metrics of Social Impact

Based on Twitter and Correlation with Traditional Metrics of Scientific Impact

Gunther EysenbachJMIR (2011)Highly tweeted articles were 11 times more likely to be

highly cited than less-tweeted articles (912 or 75 of highly tweeted article were highly cited while only 343 or 7 of less-tweeted articles were highly cited rate ratio 075007 = 1075 95 confidence interval 34ndash336) Top-cited articles can be predicted from top-tweeted articles with 93 specificity and 75 sensitivity

Twitatio

ns

Twimpact

The odds of an article being highly cited were significantly increased by a mention in social media OR 258 plt0001

020523

Altmetrics

In scholarly and scientific publishing Altmetrics are new metrics proposed as an alternative to the widely used journal impact factor and personal citation indices like the h-index

(Wikipedia)

Beware of predatory journals

Edited by Karen Holland and Roger Watson

An invaluable guide on writing for publication enabling

the reader to develop skills in writing articles book reviews and other forms

of publications written by experts in the field

September 2012 288 pagesISBN

9780470657829pound1999 euro2590 $3295

Order online at wwwwileycomPrefer digital Visit your e-book retailer to order

Writing for Publication in Nursing and Healthcare

Getting It Right

bull High standard rigorous peer reviewbull Quality and reputationbull Immediate open accessbull Fully compliant with all open access mandatesbull Authors retain copyrightndasharticles publish under CC-BY license

Open access research in all aspects of nursingand midwifery practice research education and policy

EditorRoger Watson University of Hull

wwwnursingopenjournalcom

rwatsonhullacuk

0000-0001-8040-7625

rwatson1955

  • PowerPoint Presentation
  • Slide 2
  • Slide 3
  • Quality assurance in the publication process authors editors reviewers publishers
  • Slide 5
  • Slide 6
  • Slide 7
  • Slide 8
  • Slide 9
  • Slide 10
  • Slide 11
  • Slide 12
  • Slide 13
  • Slide 14
  • Slide 15
  • Slide 16
  • Slide 17
  • Slide 18
  • Slide 19
  • Slide 20
  • Slide 21
  • Authorship
  • Slide 23
  • Slide 24
  • Slide 25
  • Slide 26
  • Slide 27
  • Slide 28
  • Slide 29
  • Slide 30
  • Slide 31
  • Do you feel like this
  • Slide 33
  • The power of
  • Slide 35
  • Can Tweets Predict Citations Metrics of Social Impact Based on Twitter and Correlation with Traditional Metrics of Scientific Impact Gunther Eysenbach
  • Slide 37
  • Altmetrics
  • Slide 39
  • Slide 40
  • Beware of predatory journals
  • Slide 42
  • Slide 43
  • Slide 44
  • Writing for Publication in Nursing and Healthcare Getting It Right
  • Slide 46
  • Slide 47
Page 12: Through the eyes of the editor: nursing research

Promoting integrity in research publication

COPE httppublicationethicsorg

Authorship

International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) at httpwwwicmjeorg states authorship is based on

1) substantial contributions to the conception and design of a paper or acquisition of data or analysis and interpretation of data and

2) drafting the article or revising it critically for important intellectual content and final approval of the version to be published

Preventing Plagiarism in Published Works

International relevance

Keep asking yourself whether a reader in a region or country very different from your own will be able to make sense of everything in your paper

Abstract

bullrefer in the aims andor background to the global relevance of the topic

bullinclude names of countryies in which the work was undertaken

bullemphasise the international relevance of the conclusions

Expect to have several revisions

hellipIrsquom one of the worldrsquos greatest rewriters

James Mitchener

Learn when to let go

Dealing with reviewerrsquos comments

Apply the lsquogolden rulesrsquo (Williams 2004)

Rule 1 Answer completely

Rule 2 Answer politely

Rule 3 Answer with evidence

Answer completely

Deal with every point even if you donrsquot agree or canrsquot change it

Make a list of points ndash even if not presented with a list

Answer politely

Donrsquot start with

lsquoWe completely disagree with the comments of the reviewerrsquo

lsquoWho on earth are your reviewersrsquo

hellipetc

Answer with evidence

If you disagree with the reviewer then provide evidence facts and references

Do you feel like this

I just donrsquot get Twitter

The power of

Can Tweets Predict Citations Metrics of Social Impact

Based on Twitter and Correlation with Traditional Metrics of Scientific Impact

Gunther EysenbachJMIR (2011)Highly tweeted articles were 11 times more likely to be

highly cited than less-tweeted articles (912 or 75 of highly tweeted article were highly cited while only 343 or 7 of less-tweeted articles were highly cited rate ratio 075007 = 1075 95 confidence interval 34ndash336) Top-cited articles can be predicted from top-tweeted articles with 93 specificity and 75 sensitivity

Twitatio

ns

Twimpact

The odds of an article being highly cited were significantly increased by a mention in social media OR 258 plt0001

020523

Altmetrics

In scholarly and scientific publishing Altmetrics are new metrics proposed as an alternative to the widely used journal impact factor and personal citation indices like the h-index

(Wikipedia)

Beware of predatory journals

Edited by Karen Holland and Roger Watson

An invaluable guide on writing for publication enabling

the reader to develop skills in writing articles book reviews and other forms

of publications written by experts in the field

September 2012 288 pagesISBN

9780470657829pound1999 euro2590 $3295

Order online at wwwwileycomPrefer digital Visit your e-book retailer to order

Writing for Publication in Nursing and Healthcare

Getting It Right

bull High standard rigorous peer reviewbull Quality and reputationbull Immediate open accessbull Fully compliant with all open access mandatesbull Authors retain copyrightndasharticles publish under CC-BY license

Open access research in all aspects of nursingand midwifery practice research education and policy

EditorRoger Watson University of Hull

wwwnursingopenjournalcom

rwatsonhullacuk

0000-0001-8040-7625

rwatson1955

  • PowerPoint Presentation
  • Slide 2
  • Slide 3
  • Quality assurance in the publication process authors editors reviewers publishers
  • Slide 5
  • Slide 6
  • Slide 7
  • Slide 8
  • Slide 9
  • Slide 10
  • Slide 11
  • Slide 12
  • Slide 13
  • Slide 14
  • Slide 15
  • Slide 16
  • Slide 17
  • Slide 18
  • Slide 19
  • Slide 20
  • Slide 21
  • Authorship
  • Slide 23
  • Slide 24
  • Slide 25
  • Slide 26
  • Slide 27
  • Slide 28
  • Slide 29
  • Slide 30
  • Slide 31
  • Do you feel like this
  • Slide 33
  • The power of
  • Slide 35
  • Can Tweets Predict Citations Metrics of Social Impact Based on Twitter and Correlation with Traditional Metrics of Scientific Impact Gunther Eysenbach
  • Slide 37
  • Altmetrics
  • Slide 39
  • Slide 40
  • Beware of predatory journals
  • Slide 42
  • Slide 43
  • Slide 44
  • Writing for Publication in Nursing and Healthcare Getting It Right
  • Slide 46
  • Slide 47
Page 13: Through the eyes of the editor: nursing research

Authorship

International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) at httpwwwicmjeorg states authorship is based on

1) substantial contributions to the conception and design of a paper or acquisition of data or analysis and interpretation of data and

2) drafting the article or revising it critically for important intellectual content and final approval of the version to be published

Preventing Plagiarism in Published Works

International relevance

Keep asking yourself whether a reader in a region or country very different from your own will be able to make sense of everything in your paper

Abstract

bullrefer in the aims andor background to the global relevance of the topic

bullinclude names of countryies in which the work was undertaken

bullemphasise the international relevance of the conclusions

Expect to have several revisions

hellipIrsquom one of the worldrsquos greatest rewriters

James Mitchener

Learn when to let go

Dealing with reviewerrsquos comments

Apply the lsquogolden rulesrsquo (Williams 2004)

Rule 1 Answer completely

Rule 2 Answer politely

Rule 3 Answer with evidence

Answer completely

Deal with every point even if you donrsquot agree or canrsquot change it

Make a list of points ndash even if not presented with a list

Answer politely

Donrsquot start with

lsquoWe completely disagree with the comments of the reviewerrsquo

lsquoWho on earth are your reviewersrsquo

hellipetc

Answer with evidence

If you disagree with the reviewer then provide evidence facts and references

Do you feel like this

I just donrsquot get Twitter

The power of

Can Tweets Predict Citations Metrics of Social Impact

Based on Twitter and Correlation with Traditional Metrics of Scientific Impact

Gunther EysenbachJMIR (2011)Highly tweeted articles were 11 times more likely to be

highly cited than less-tweeted articles (912 or 75 of highly tweeted article were highly cited while only 343 or 7 of less-tweeted articles were highly cited rate ratio 075007 = 1075 95 confidence interval 34ndash336) Top-cited articles can be predicted from top-tweeted articles with 93 specificity and 75 sensitivity

Twitatio

ns

Twimpact

The odds of an article being highly cited were significantly increased by a mention in social media OR 258 plt0001

020523

Altmetrics

In scholarly and scientific publishing Altmetrics are new metrics proposed as an alternative to the widely used journal impact factor and personal citation indices like the h-index

(Wikipedia)

Beware of predatory journals

Edited by Karen Holland and Roger Watson

An invaluable guide on writing for publication enabling

the reader to develop skills in writing articles book reviews and other forms

of publications written by experts in the field

September 2012 288 pagesISBN

9780470657829pound1999 euro2590 $3295

Order online at wwwwileycomPrefer digital Visit your e-book retailer to order

Writing for Publication in Nursing and Healthcare

Getting It Right

bull High standard rigorous peer reviewbull Quality and reputationbull Immediate open accessbull Fully compliant with all open access mandatesbull Authors retain copyrightndasharticles publish under CC-BY license

Open access research in all aspects of nursingand midwifery practice research education and policy

EditorRoger Watson University of Hull

wwwnursingopenjournalcom

rwatsonhullacuk

0000-0001-8040-7625

rwatson1955

  • PowerPoint Presentation
  • Slide 2
  • Slide 3
  • Quality assurance in the publication process authors editors reviewers publishers
  • Slide 5
  • Slide 6
  • Slide 7
  • Slide 8
  • Slide 9
  • Slide 10
  • Slide 11
  • Slide 12
  • Slide 13
  • Slide 14
  • Slide 15
  • Slide 16
  • Slide 17
  • Slide 18
  • Slide 19
  • Slide 20
  • Slide 21
  • Authorship
  • Slide 23
  • Slide 24
  • Slide 25
  • Slide 26
  • Slide 27
  • Slide 28
  • Slide 29
  • Slide 30
  • Slide 31
  • Do you feel like this
  • Slide 33
  • The power of
  • Slide 35
  • Can Tweets Predict Citations Metrics of Social Impact Based on Twitter and Correlation with Traditional Metrics of Scientific Impact Gunther Eysenbach
  • Slide 37
  • Altmetrics
  • Slide 39
  • Slide 40
  • Beware of predatory journals
  • Slide 42
  • Slide 43
  • Slide 44
  • Writing for Publication in Nursing and Healthcare Getting It Right
  • Slide 46
  • Slide 47
Page 14: Through the eyes of the editor: nursing research

Preventing Plagiarism in Published Works

International relevance

Keep asking yourself whether a reader in a region or country very different from your own will be able to make sense of everything in your paper

Abstract

bullrefer in the aims andor background to the global relevance of the topic

bullinclude names of countryies in which the work was undertaken

bullemphasise the international relevance of the conclusions

Expect to have several revisions

hellipIrsquom one of the worldrsquos greatest rewriters

James Mitchener

Learn when to let go

Dealing with reviewerrsquos comments

Apply the lsquogolden rulesrsquo (Williams 2004)

Rule 1 Answer completely

Rule 2 Answer politely

Rule 3 Answer with evidence

Answer completely

Deal with every point even if you donrsquot agree or canrsquot change it

Make a list of points ndash even if not presented with a list

Answer politely

Donrsquot start with

lsquoWe completely disagree with the comments of the reviewerrsquo

lsquoWho on earth are your reviewersrsquo

hellipetc

Answer with evidence

If you disagree with the reviewer then provide evidence facts and references

Do you feel like this

I just donrsquot get Twitter

The power of

Can Tweets Predict Citations Metrics of Social Impact

Based on Twitter and Correlation with Traditional Metrics of Scientific Impact

Gunther EysenbachJMIR (2011)Highly tweeted articles were 11 times more likely to be

highly cited than less-tweeted articles (912 or 75 of highly tweeted article were highly cited while only 343 or 7 of less-tweeted articles were highly cited rate ratio 075007 = 1075 95 confidence interval 34ndash336) Top-cited articles can be predicted from top-tweeted articles with 93 specificity and 75 sensitivity

Twitatio

ns

Twimpact

The odds of an article being highly cited were significantly increased by a mention in social media OR 258 plt0001

020523

Altmetrics

In scholarly and scientific publishing Altmetrics are new metrics proposed as an alternative to the widely used journal impact factor and personal citation indices like the h-index

(Wikipedia)

Beware of predatory journals

Edited by Karen Holland and Roger Watson

An invaluable guide on writing for publication enabling

the reader to develop skills in writing articles book reviews and other forms

of publications written by experts in the field

September 2012 288 pagesISBN

9780470657829pound1999 euro2590 $3295

Order online at wwwwileycomPrefer digital Visit your e-book retailer to order

Writing for Publication in Nursing and Healthcare

Getting It Right

bull High standard rigorous peer reviewbull Quality and reputationbull Immediate open accessbull Fully compliant with all open access mandatesbull Authors retain copyrightndasharticles publish under CC-BY license

Open access research in all aspects of nursingand midwifery practice research education and policy

EditorRoger Watson University of Hull

wwwnursingopenjournalcom

rwatsonhullacuk

0000-0001-8040-7625

rwatson1955

  • PowerPoint Presentation
  • Slide 2
  • Slide 3
  • Quality assurance in the publication process authors editors reviewers publishers
  • Slide 5
  • Slide 6
  • Slide 7
  • Slide 8
  • Slide 9
  • Slide 10
  • Slide 11
  • Slide 12
  • Slide 13
  • Slide 14
  • Slide 15
  • Slide 16
  • Slide 17
  • Slide 18
  • Slide 19
  • Slide 20
  • Slide 21
  • Authorship
  • Slide 23
  • Slide 24
  • Slide 25
  • Slide 26
  • Slide 27
  • Slide 28
  • Slide 29
  • Slide 30
  • Slide 31
  • Do you feel like this
  • Slide 33
  • The power of
  • Slide 35
  • Can Tweets Predict Citations Metrics of Social Impact Based on Twitter and Correlation with Traditional Metrics of Scientific Impact Gunther Eysenbach
  • Slide 37
  • Altmetrics
  • Slide 39
  • Slide 40
  • Beware of predatory journals
  • Slide 42
  • Slide 43
  • Slide 44
  • Writing for Publication in Nursing and Healthcare Getting It Right
  • Slide 46
  • Slide 47
Page 15: Through the eyes of the editor: nursing research

International relevance

Keep asking yourself whether a reader in a region or country very different from your own will be able to make sense of everything in your paper

Abstract

bullrefer in the aims andor background to the global relevance of the topic

bullinclude names of countryies in which the work was undertaken

bullemphasise the international relevance of the conclusions

Expect to have several revisions

hellipIrsquom one of the worldrsquos greatest rewriters

James Mitchener

Learn when to let go

Dealing with reviewerrsquos comments

Apply the lsquogolden rulesrsquo (Williams 2004)

Rule 1 Answer completely

Rule 2 Answer politely

Rule 3 Answer with evidence

Answer completely

Deal with every point even if you donrsquot agree or canrsquot change it

Make a list of points ndash even if not presented with a list

Answer politely

Donrsquot start with

lsquoWe completely disagree with the comments of the reviewerrsquo

lsquoWho on earth are your reviewersrsquo

hellipetc

Answer with evidence

If you disagree with the reviewer then provide evidence facts and references

Do you feel like this

I just donrsquot get Twitter

The power of

Can Tweets Predict Citations Metrics of Social Impact

Based on Twitter and Correlation with Traditional Metrics of Scientific Impact

Gunther EysenbachJMIR (2011)Highly tweeted articles were 11 times more likely to be

highly cited than less-tweeted articles (912 or 75 of highly tweeted article were highly cited while only 343 or 7 of less-tweeted articles were highly cited rate ratio 075007 = 1075 95 confidence interval 34ndash336) Top-cited articles can be predicted from top-tweeted articles with 93 specificity and 75 sensitivity

Twitatio

ns

Twimpact

The odds of an article being highly cited were significantly increased by a mention in social media OR 258 plt0001

020523

Altmetrics

In scholarly and scientific publishing Altmetrics are new metrics proposed as an alternative to the widely used journal impact factor and personal citation indices like the h-index

(Wikipedia)

Beware of predatory journals

Edited by Karen Holland and Roger Watson

An invaluable guide on writing for publication enabling

the reader to develop skills in writing articles book reviews and other forms

of publications written by experts in the field

September 2012 288 pagesISBN

9780470657829pound1999 euro2590 $3295

Order online at wwwwileycomPrefer digital Visit your e-book retailer to order

Writing for Publication in Nursing and Healthcare

Getting It Right

bull High standard rigorous peer reviewbull Quality and reputationbull Immediate open accessbull Fully compliant with all open access mandatesbull Authors retain copyrightndasharticles publish under CC-BY license

Open access research in all aspects of nursingand midwifery practice research education and policy

EditorRoger Watson University of Hull

wwwnursingopenjournalcom

rwatsonhullacuk

0000-0001-8040-7625

rwatson1955

  • PowerPoint Presentation
  • Slide 2
  • Slide 3
  • Quality assurance in the publication process authors editors reviewers publishers
  • Slide 5
  • Slide 6
  • Slide 7
  • Slide 8
  • Slide 9
  • Slide 10
  • Slide 11
  • Slide 12
  • Slide 13
  • Slide 14
  • Slide 15
  • Slide 16
  • Slide 17
  • Slide 18
  • Slide 19
  • Slide 20
  • Slide 21
  • Authorship
  • Slide 23
  • Slide 24
  • Slide 25
  • Slide 26
  • Slide 27
  • Slide 28
  • Slide 29
  • Slide 30
  • Slide 31
  • Do you feel like this
  • Slide 33
  • The power of
  • Slide 35
  • Can Tweets Predict Citations Metrics of Social Impact Based on Twitter and Correlation with Traditional Metrics of Scientific Impact Gunther Eysenbach
  • Slide 37
  • Altmetrics
  • Slide 39
  • Slide 40
  • Beware of predatory journals
  • Slide 42
  • Slide 43
  • Slide 44
  • Writing for Publication in Nursing and Healthcare Getting It Right
  • Slide 46
  • Slide 47
Page 16: Through the eyes of the editor: nursing research

Expect to have several revisions

hellipIrsquom one of the worldrsquos greatest rewriters

James Mitchener

Learn when to let go

Dealing with reviewerrsquos comments

Apply the lsquogolden rulesrsquo (Williams 2004)

Rule 1 Answer completely

Rule 2 Answer politely

Rule 3 Answer with evidence

Answer completely

Deal with every point even if you donrsquot agree or canrsquot change it

Make a list of points ndash even if not presented with a list

Answer politely

Donrsquot start with

lsquoWe completely disagree with the comments of the reviewerrsquo

lsquoWho on earth are your reviewersrsquo

hellipetc

Answer with evidence

If you disagree with the reviewer then provide evidence facts and references

Do you feel like this

I just donrsquot get Twitter

The power of

Can Tweets Predict Citations Metrics of Social Impact

Based on Twitter and Correlation with Traditional Metrics of Scientific Impact

Gunther EysenbachJMIR (2011)Highly tweeted articles were 11 times more likely to be

highly cited than less-tweeted articles (912 or 75 of highly tweeted article were highly cited while only 343 or 7 of less-tweeted articles were highly cited rate ratio 075007 = 1075 95 confidence interval 34ndash336) Top-cited articles can be predicted from top-tweeted articles with 93 specificity and 75 sensitivity

Twitatio

ns

Twimpact

The odds of an article being highly cited were significantly increased by a mention in social media OR 258 plt0001

020523

Altmetrics

In scholarly and scientific publishing Altmetrics are new metrics proposed as an alternative to the widely used journal impact factor and personal citation indices like the h-index

(Wikipedia)

Beware of predatory journals

Edited by Karen Holland and Roger Watson

An invaluable guide on writing for publication enabling

the reader to develop skills in writing articles book reviews and other forms

of publications written by experts in the field

September 2012 288 pagesISBN

9780470657829pound1999 euro2590 $3295

Order online at wwwwileycomPrefer digital Visit your e-book retailer to order

Writing for Publication in Nursing and Healthcare

Getting It Right

bull High standard rigorous peer reviewbull Quality and reputationbull Immediate open accessbull Fully compliant with all open access mandatesbull Authors retain copyrightndasharticles publish under CC-BY license

Open access research in all aspects of nursingand midwifery practice research education and policy

EditorRoger Watson University of Hull

wwwnursingopenjournalcom

rwatsonhullacuk

0000-0001-8040-7625

rwatson1955

  • PowerPoint Presentation
  • Slide 2
  • Slide 3
  • Quality assurance in the publication process authors editors reviewers publishers
  • Slide 5
  • Slide 6
  • Slide 7
  • Slide 8
  • Slide 9
  • Slide 10
  • Slide 11
  • Slide 12
  • Slide 13
  • Slide 14
  • Slide 15
  • Slide 16
  • Slide 17
  • Slide 18
  • Slide 19
  • Slide 20
  • Slide 21
  • Authorship
  • Slide 23
  • Slide 24
  • Slide 25
  • Slide 26
  • Slide 27
  • Slide 28
  • Slide 29
  • Slide 30
  • Slide 31
  • Do you feel like this
  • Slide 33
  • The power of
  • Slide 35
  • Can Tweets Predict Citations Metrics of Social Impact Based on Twitter and Correlation with Traditional Metrics of Scientific Impact Gunther Eysenbach
  • Slide 37
  • Altmetrics
  • Slide 39
  • Slide 40
  • Beware of predatory journals
  • Slide 42
  • Slide 43
  • Slide 44
  • Writing for Publication in Nursing and Healthcare Getting It Right
  • Slide 46
  • Slide 47
Page 17: Through the eyes of the editor: nursing research

Learn when to let go

Dealing with reviewerrsquos comments

Apply the lsquogolden rulesrsquo (Williams 2004)

Rule 1 Answer completely

Rule 2 Answer politely

Rule 3 Answer with evidence

Answer completely

Deal with every point even if you donrsquot agree or canrsquot change it

Make a list of points ndash even if not presented with a list

Answer politely

Donrsquot start with

lsquoWe completely disagree with the comments of the reviewerrsquo

lsquoWho on earth are your reviewersrsquo

hellipetc

Answer with evidence

If you disagree with the reviewer then provide evidence facts and references

Do you feel like this

I just donrsquot get Twitter

The power of

Can Tweets Predict Citations Metrics of Social Impact

Based on Twitter and Correlation with Traditional Metrics of Scientific Impact

Gunther EysenbachJMIR (2011)Highly tweeted articles were 11 times more likely to be

highly cited than less-tweeted articles (912 or 75 of highly tweeted article were highly cited while only 343 or 7 of less-tweeted articles were highly cited rate ratio 075007 = 1075 95 confidence interval 34ndash336) Top-cited articles can be predicted from top-tweeted articles with 93 specificity and 75 sensitivity

Twitatio

ns

Twimpact

The odds of an article being highly cited were significantly increased by a mention in social media OR 258 plt0001

020523

Altmetrics

In scholarly and scientific publishing Altmetrics are new metrics proposed as an alternative to the widely used journal impact factor and personal citation indices like the h-index

(Wikipedia)

Beware of predatory journals

Edited by Karen Holland and Roger Watson

An invaluable guide on writing for publication enabling

the reader to develop skills in writing articles book reviews and other forms

of publications written by experts in the field

September 2012 288 pagesISBN

9780470657829pound1999 euro2590 $3295

Order online at wwwwileycomPrefer digital Visit your e-book retailer to order

Writing for Publication in Nursing and Healthcare

Getting It Right

bull High standard rigorous peer reviewbull Quality and reputationbull Immediate open accessbull Fully compliant with all open access mandatesbull Authors retain copyrightndasharticles publish under CC-BY license

Open access research in all aspects of nursingand midwifery practice research education and policy

EditorRoger Watson University of Hull

wwwnursingopenjournalcom

rwatsonhullacuk

0000-0001-8040-7625

rwatson1955

  • PowerPoint Presentation
  • Slide 2
  • Slide 3
  • Quality assurance in the publication process authors editors reviewers publishers
  • Slide 5
  • Slide 6
  • Slide 7
  • Slide 8
  • Slide 9
  • Slide 10
  • Slide 11
  • Slide 12
  • Slide 13
  • Slide 14
  • Slide 15
  • Slide 16
  • Slide 17
  • Slide 18
  • Slide 19
  • Slide 20
  • Slide 21
  • Authorship
  • Slide 23
  • Slide 24
  • Slide 25
  • Slide 26
  • Slide 27
  • Slide 28
  • Slide 29
  • Slide 30
  • Slide 31
  • Do you feel like this
  • Slide 33
  • The power of
  • Slide 35
  • Can Tweets Predict Citations Metrics of Social Impact Based on Twitter and Correlation with Traditional Metrics of Scientific Impact Gunther Eysenbach
  • Slide 37
  • Altmetrics
  • Slide 39
  • Slide 40
  • Beware of predatory journals
  • Slide 42
  • Slide 43
  • Slide 44
  • Writing for Publication in Nursing and Healthcare Getting It Right
  • Slide 46
  • Slide 47
Page 18: Through the eyes of the editor: nursing research

Dealing with reviewerrsquos comments

Apply the lsquogolden rulesrsquo (Williams 2004)

Rule 1 Answer completely

Rule 2 Answer politely

Rule 3 Answer with evidence

Answer completely

Deal with every point even if you donrsquot agree or canrsquot change it

Make a list of points ndash even if not presented with a list

Answer politely

Donrsquot start with

lsquoWe completely disagree with the comments of the reviewerrsquo

lsquoWho on earth are your reviewersrsquo

hellipetc

Answer with evidence

If you disagree with the reviewer then provide evidence facts and references

Do you feel like this

I just donrsquot get Twitter

The power of

Can Tweets Predict Citations Metrics of Social Impact

Based on Twitter and Correlation with Traditional Metrics of Scientific Impact

Gunther EysenbachJMIR (2011)Highly tweeted articles were 11 times more likely to be

highly cited than less-tweeted articles (912 or 75 of highly tweeted article were highly cited while only 343 or 7 of less-tweeted articles were highly cited rate ratio 075007 = 1075 95 confidence interval 34ndash336) Top-cited articles can be predicted from top-tweeted articles with 93 specificity and 75 sensitivity

Twitatio

ns

Twimpact

The odds of an article being highly cited were significantly increased by a mention in social media OR 258 plt0001

020523

Altmetrics

In scholarly and scientific publishing Altmetrics are new metrics proposed as an alternative to the widely used journal impact factor and personal citation indices like the h-index

(Wikipedia)

Beware of predatory journals

Edited by Karen Holland and Roger Watson

An invaluable guide on writing for publication enabling

the reader to develop skills in writing articles book reviews and other forms

of publications written by experts in the field

September 2012 288 pagesISBN

9780470657829pound1999 euro2590 $3295

Order online at wwwwileycomPrefer digital Visit your e-book retailer to order

Writing for Publication in Nursing and Healthcare

Getting It Right

bull High standard rigorous peer reviewbull Quality and reputationbull Immediate open accessbull Fully compliant with all open access mandatesbull Authors retain copyrightndasharticles publish under CC-BY license

Open access research in all aspects of nursingand midwifery practice research education and policy

EditorRoger Watson University of Hull

wwwnursingopenjournalcom

rwatsonhullacuk

0000-0001-8040-7625

rwatson1955

  • PowerPoint Presentation
  • Slide 2
  • Slide 3
  • Quality assurance in the publication process authors editors reviewers publishers
  • Slide 5
  • Slide 6
  • Slide 7
  • Slide 8
  • Slide 9
  • Slide 10
  • Slide 11
  • Slide 12
  • Slide 13
  • Slide 14
  • Slide 15
  • Slide 16
  • Slide 17
  • Slide 18
  • Slide 19
  • Slide 20
  • Slide 21
  • Authorship
  • Slide 23
  • Slide 24
  • Slide 25
  • Slide 26
  • Slide 27
  • Slide 28
  • Slide 29
  • Slide 30
  • Slide 31
  • Do you feel like this
  • Slide 33
  • The power of
  • Slide 35
  • Can Tweets Predict Citations Metrics of Social Impact Based on Twitter and Correlation with Traditional Metrics of Scientific Impact Gunther Eysenbach
  • Slide 37
  • Altmetrics
  • Slide 39
  • Slide 40
  • Beware of predatory journals
  • Slide 42
  • Slide 43
  • Slide 44
  • Writing for Publication in Nursing and Healthcare Getting It Right
  • Slide 46
  • Slide 47
Page 19: Through the eyes of the editor: nursing research

Answer completely

Deal with every point even if you donrsquot agree or canrsquot change it

Make a list of points ndash even if not presented with a list

Answer politely

Donrsquot start with

lsquoWe completely disagree with the comments of the reviewerrsquo

lsquoWho on earth are your reviewersrsquo

hellipetc

Answer with evidence

If you disagree with the reviewer then provide evidence facts and references

Do you feel like this

I just donrsquot get Twitter

The power of

Can Tweets Predict Citations Metrics of Social Impact

Based on Twitter and Correlation with Traditional Metrics of Scientific Impact

Gunther EysenbachJMIR (2011)Highly tweeted articles were 11 times more likely to be

highly cited than less-tweeted articles (912 or 75 of highly tweeted article were highly cited while only 343 or 7 of less-tweeted articles were highly cited rate ratio 075007 = 1075 95 confidence interval 34ndash336) Top-cited articles can be predicted from top-tweeted articles with 93 specificity and 75 sensitivity

Twitatio

ns

Twimpact

The odds of an article being highly cited were significantly increased by a mention in social media OR 258 plt0001

020523

Altmetrics

In scholarly and scientific publishing Altmetrics are new metrics proposed as an alternative to the widely used journal impact factor and personal citation indices like the h-index

(Wikipedia)

Beware of predatory journals

Edited by Karen Holland and Roger Watson

An invaluable guide on writing for publication enabling

the reader to develop skills in writing articles book reviews and other forms

of publications written by experts in the field

September 2012 288 pagesISBN

9780470657829pound1999 euro2590 $3295

Order online at wwwwileycomPrefer digital Visit your e-book retailer to order

Writing for Publication in Nursing and Healthcare

Getting It Right

bull High standard rigorous peer reviewbull Quality and reputationbull Immediate open accessbull Fully compliant with all open access mandatesbull Authors retain copyrightndasharticles publish under CC-BY license

Open access research in all aspects of nursingand midwifery practice research education and policy

EditorRoger Watson University of Hull

wwwnursingopenjournalcom

rwatsonhullacuk

0000-0001-8040-7625

rwatson1955

  • PowerPoint Presentation
  • Slide 2
  • Slide 3
  • Quality assurance in the publication process authors editors reviewers publishers
  • Slide 5
  • Slide 6
  • Slide 7
  • Slide 8
  • Slide 9
  • Slide 10
  • Slide 11
  • Slide 12
  • Slide 13
  • Slide 14
  • Slide 15
  • Slide 16
  • Slide 17
  • Slide 18
  • Slide 19
  • Slide 20
  • Slide 21
  • Authorship
  • Slide 23
  • Slide 24
  • Slide 25
  • Slide 26
  • Slide 27
  • Slide 28
  • Slide 29
  • Slide 30
  • Slide 31
  • Do you feel like this
  • Slide 33
  • The power of
  • Slide 35
  • Can Tweets Predict Citations Metrics of Social Impact Based on Twitter and Correlation with Traditional Metrics of Scientific Impact Gunther Eysenbach
  • Slide 37
  • Altmetrics
  • Slide 39
  • Slide 40
  • Beware of predatory journals
  • Slide 42
  • Slide 43
  • Slide 44
  • Writing for Publication in Nursing and Healthcare Getting It Right
  • Slide 46
  • Slide 47
Page 20: Through the eyes of the editor: nursing research

Answer politely

Donrsquot start with

lsquoWe completely disagree with the comments of the reviewerrsquo

lsquoWho on earth are your reviewersrsquo

hellipetc

Answer with evidence

If you disagree with the reviewer then provide evidence facts and references

Do you feel like this

I just donrsquot get Twitter

The power of

Can Tweets Predict Citations Metrics of Social Impact

Based on Twitter and Correlation with Traditional Metrics of Scientific Impact

Gunther EysenbachJMIR (2011)Highly tweeted articles were 11 times more likely to be

highly cited than less-tweeted articles (912 or 75 of highly tweeted article were highly cited while only 343 or 7 of less-tweeted articles were highly cited rate ratio 075007 = 1075 95 confidence interval 34ndash336) Top-cited articles can be predicted from top-tweeted articles with 93 specificity and 75 sensitivity

Twitatio

ns

Twimpact

The odds of an article being highly cited were significantly increased by a mention in social media OR 258 plt0001

020523

Altmetrics

In scholarly and scientific publishing Altmetrics are new metrics proposed as an alternative to the widely used journal impact factor and personal citation indices like the h-index

(Wikipedia)

Beware of predatory journals

Edited by Karen Holland and Roger Watson

An invaluable guide on writing for publication enabling

the reader to develop skills in writing articles book reviews and other forms

of publications written by experts in the field

September 2012 288 pagesISBN

9780470657829pound1999 euro2590 $3295

Order online at wwwwileycomPrefer digital Visit your e-book retailer to order

Writing for Publication in Nursing and Healthcare

Getting It Right

bull High standard rigorous peer reviewbull Quality and reputationbull Immediate open accessbull Fully compliant with all open access mandatesbull Authors retain copyrightndasharticles publish under CC-BY license

Open access research in all aspects of nursingand midwifery practice research education and policy

EditorRoger Watson University of Hull

wwwnursingopenjournalcom

rwatsonhullacuk

0000-0001-8040-7625

rwatson1955

  • PowerPoint Presentation
  • Slide 2
  • Slide 3
  • Quality assurance in the publication process authors editors reviewers publishers
  • Slide 5
  • Slide 6
  • Slide 7
  • Slide 8
  • Slide 9
  • Slide 10
  • Slide 11
  • Slide 12
  • Slide 13
  • Slide 14
  • Slide 15
  • Slide 16
  • Slide 17
  • Slide 18
  • Slide 19
  • Slide 20
  • Slide 21
  • Authorship
  • Slide 23
  • Slide 24
  • Slide 25
  • Slide 26
  • Slide 27
  • Slide 28
  • Slide 29
  • Slide 30
  • Slide 31
  • Do you feel like this
  • Slide 33
  • The power of
  • Slide 35
  • Can Tweets Predict Citations Metrics of Social Impact Based on Twitter and Correlation with Traditional Metrics of Scientific Impact Gunther Eysenbach
  • Slide 37
  • Altmetrics
  • Slide 39
  • Slide 40
  • Beware of predatory journals
  • Slide 42
  • Slide 43
  • Slide 44
  • Writing for Publication in Nursing and Healthcare Getting It Right
  • Slide 46
  • Slide 47
Page 21: Through the eyes of the editor: nursing research

Answer with evidence

If you disagree with the reviewer then provide evidence facts and references

Do you feel like this

I just donrsquot get Twitter

The power of

Can Tweets Predict Citations Metrics of Social Impact

Based on Twitter and Correlation with Traditional Metrics of Scientific Impact

Gunther EysenbachJMIR (2011)Highly tweeted articles were 11 times more likely to be

highly cited than less-tweeted articles (912 or 75 of highly tweeted article were highly cited while only 343 or 7 of less-tweeted articles were highly cited rate ratio 075007 = 1075 95 confidence interval 34ndash336) Top-cited articles can be predicted from top-tweeted articles with 93 specificity and 75 sensitivity

Twitatio

ns

Twimpact

The odds of an article being highly cited were significantly increased by a mention in social media OR 258 plt0001

020523

Altmetrics

In scholarly and scientific publishing Altmetrics are new metrics proposed as an alternative to the widely used journal impact factor and personal citation indices like the h-index

(Wikipedia)

Beware of predatory journals

Edited by Karen Holland and Roger Watson

An invaluable guide on writing for publication enabling

the reader to develop skills in writing articles book reviews and other forms

of publications written by experts in the field

September 2012 288 pagesISBN

9780470657829pound1999 euro2590 $3295

Order online at wwwwileycomPrefer digital Visit your e-book retailer to order

Writing for Publication in Nursing and Healthcare

Getting It Right

bull High standard rigorous peer reviewbull Quality and reputationbull Immediate open accessbull Fully compliant with all open access mandatesbull Authors retain copyrightndasharticles publish under CC-BY license

Open access research in all aspects of nursingand midwifery practice research education and policy

EditorRoger Watson University of Hull

wwwnursingopenjournalcom

rwatsonhullacuk

0000-0001-8040-7625

rwatson1955

  • PowerPoint Presentation
  • Slide 2
  • Slide 3
  • Quality assurance in the publication process authors editors reviewers publishers
  • Slide 5
  • Slide 6
  • Slide 7
  • Slide 8
  • Slide 9
  • Slide 10
  • Slide 11
  • Slide 12
  • Slide 13
  • Slide 14
  • Slide 15
  • Slide 16
  • Slide 17
  • Slide 18
  • Slide 19
  • Slide 20
  • Slide 21
  • Authorship
  • Slide 23
  • Slide 24
  • Slide 25
  • Slide 26
  • Slide 27
  • Slide 28
  • Slide 29
  • Slide 30
  • Slide 31
  • Do you feel like this
  • Slide 33
  • The power of
  • Slide 35
  • Can Tweets Predict Citations Metrics of Social Impact Based on Twitter and Correlation with Traditional Metrics of Scientific Impact Gunther Eysenbach
  • Slide 37
  • Altmetrics
  • Slide 39
  • Slide 40
  • Beware of predatory journals
  • Slide 42
  • Slide 43
  • Slide 44
  • Writing for Publication in Nursing and Healthcare Getting It Right
  • Slide 46
  • Slide 47
Page 22: Through the eyes of the editor: nursing research

Do you feel like this

I just donrsquot get Twitter

The power of

Can Tweets Predict Citations Metrics of Social Impact

Based on Twitter and Correlation with Traditional Metrics of Scientific Impact

Gunther EysenbachJMIR (2011)Highly tweeted articles were 11 times more likely to be

highly cited than less-tweeted articles (912 or 75 of highly tweeted article were highly cited while only 343 or 7 of less-tweeted articles were highly cited rate ratio 075007 = 1075 95 confidence interval 34ndash336) Top-cited articles can be predicted from top-tweeted articles with 93 specificity and 75 sensitivity

Twitatio

ns

Twimpact

The odds of an article being highly cited were significantly increased by a mention in social media OR 258 plt0001

020523

Altmetrics

In scholarly and scientific publishing Altmetrics are new metrics proposed as an alternative to the widely used journal impact factor and personal citation indices like the h-index

(Wikipedia)

Beware of predatory journals

Edited by Karen Holland and Roger Watson

An invaluable guide on writing for publication enabling

the reader to develop skills in writing articles book reviews and other forms

of publications written by experts in the field

September 2012 288 pagesISBN

9780470657829pound1999 euro2590 $3295

Order online at wwwwileycomPrefer digital Visit your e-book retailer to order

Writing for Publication in Nursing and Healthcare

Getting It Right

bull High standard rigorous peer reviewbull Quality and reputationbull Immediate open accessbull Fully compliant with all open access mandatesbull Authors retain copyrightndasharticles publish under CC-BY license

Open access research in all aspects of nursingand midwifery practice research education and policy

EditorRoger Watson University of Hull

wwwnursingopenjournalcom

rwatsonhullacuk

0000-0001-8040-7625

rwatson1955

  • PowerPoint Presentation
  • Slide 2
  • Slide 3
  • Quality assurance in the publication process authors editors reviewers publishers
  • Slide 5
  • Slide 6
  • Slide 7
  • Slide 8
  • Slide 9
  • Slide 10
  • Slide 11
  • Slide 12
  • Slide 13
  • Slide 14
  • Slide 15
  • Slide 16
  • Slide 17
  • Slide 18
  • Slide 19
  • Slide 20
  • Slide 21
  • Authorship
  • Slide 23
  • Slide 24
  • Slide 25
  • Slide 26
  • Slide 27
  • Slide 28
  • Slide 29
  • Slide 30
  • Slide 31
  • Do you feel like this
  • Slide 33
  • The power of
  • Slide 35
  • Can Tweets Predict Citations Metrics of Social Impact Based on Twitter and Correlation with Traditional Metrics of Scientific Impact Gunther Eysenbach
  • Slide 37
  • Altmetrics
  • Slide 39
  • Slide 40
  • Beware of predatory journals
  • Slide 42
  • Slide 43
  • Slide 44
  • Writing for Publication in Nursing and Healthcare Getting It Right
  • Slide 46
  • Slide 47
Page 23: Through the eyes of the editor: nursing research

The power of

Can Tweets Predict Citations Metrics of Social Impact

Based on Twitter and Correlation with Traditional Metrics of Scientific Impact

Gunther EysenbachJMIR (2011)Highly tweeted articles were 11 times more likely to be

highly cited than less-tweeted articles (912 or 75 of highly tweeted article were highly cited while only 343 or 7 of less-tweeted articles were highly cited rate ratio 075007 = 1075 95 confidence interval 34ndash336) Top-cited articles can be predicted from top-tweeted articles with 93 specificity and 75 sensitivity

Twitatio

ns

Twimpact

The odds of an article being highly cited were significantly increased by a mention in social media OR 258 plt0001

020523

Altmetrics

In scholarly and scientific publishing Altmetrics are new metrics proposed as an alternative to the widely used journal impact factor and personal citation indices like the h-index

(Wikipedia)

Beware of predatory journals

Edited by Karen Holland and Roger Watson

An invaluable guide on writing for publication enabling

the reader to develop skills in writing articles book reviews and other forms

of publications written by experts in the field

September 2012 288 pagesISBN

9780470657829pound1999 euro2590 $3295

Order online at wwwwileycomPrefer digital Visit your e-book retailer to order

Writing for Publication in Nursing and Healthcare

Getting It Right

bull High standard rigorous peer reviewbull Quality and reputationbull Immediate open accessbull Fully compliant with all open access mandatesbull Authors retain copyrightndasharticles publish under CC-BY license

Open access research in all aspects of nursingand midwifery practice research education and policy

EditorRoger Watson University of Hull

wwwnursingopenjournalcom

rwatsonhullacuk

0000-0001-8040-7625

rwatson1955

  • PowerPoint Presentation
  • Slide 2
  • Slide 3
  • Quality assurance in the publication process authors editors reviewers publishers
  • Slide 5
  • Slide 6
  • Slide 7
  • Slide 8
  • Slide 9
  • Slide 10
  • Slide 11
  • Slide 12
  • Slide 13
  • Slide 14
  • Slide 15
  • Slide 16
  • Slide 17
  • Slide 18
  • Slide 19
  • Slide 20
  • Slide 21
  • Authorship
  • Slide 23
  • Slide 24
  • Slide 25
  • Slide 26
  • Slide 27
  • Slide 28
  • Slide 29
  • Slide 30
  • Slide 31
  • Do you feel like this
  • Slide 33
  • The power of
  • Slide 35
  • Can Tweets Predict Citations Metrics of Social Impact Based on Twitter and Correlation with Traditional Metrics of Scientific Impact Gunther Eysenbach
  • Slide 37
  • Altmetrics
  • Slide 39
  • Slide 40
  • Beware of predatory journals
  • Slide 42
  • Slide 43
  • Slide 44
  • Writing for Publication in Nursing and Healthcare Getting It Right
  • Slide 46
  • Slide 47
Page 24: Through the eyes of the editor: nursing research

Can Tweets Predict Citations Metrics of Social Impact

Based on Twitter and Correlation with Traditional Metrics of Scientific Impact

Gunther EysenbachJMIR (2011)Highly tweeted articles were 11 times more likely to be

highly cited than less-tweeted articles (912 or 75 of highly tweeted article were highly cited while only 343 or 7 of less-tweeted articles were highly cited rate ratio 075007 = 1075 95 confidence interval 34ndash336) Top-cited articles can be predicted from top-tweeted articles with 93 specificity and 75 sensitivity

Twitatio

ns

Twimpact

The odds of an article being highly cited were significantly increased by a mention in social media OR 258 plt0001

020523

Altmetrics

In scholarly and scientific publishing Altmetrics are new metrics proposed as an alternative to the widely used journal impact factor and personal citation indices like the h-index

(Wikipedia)

Beware of predatory journals

Edited by Karen Holland and Roger Watson

An invaluable guide on writing for publication enabling

the reader to develop skills in writing articles book reviews and other forms

of publications written by experts in the field

September 2012 288 pagesISBN

9780470657829pound1999 euro2590 $3295

Order online at wwwwileycomPrefer digital Visit your e-book retailer to order

Writing for Publication in Nursing and Healthcare

Getting It Right

bull High standard rigorous peer reviewbull Quality and reputationbull Immediate open accessbull Fully compliant with all open access mandatesbull Authors retain copyrightndasharticles publish under CC-BY license

Open access research in all aspects of nursingand midwifery practice research education and policy

EditorRoger Watson University of Hull

wwwnursingopenjournalcom

rwatsonhullacuk

0000-0001-8040-7625

rwatson1955

  • PowerPoint Presentation
  • Slide 2
  • Slide 3
  • Quality assurance in the publication process authors editors reviewers publishers
  • Slide 5
  • Slide 6
  • Slide 7
  • Slide 8
  • Slide 9
  • Slide 10
  • Slide 11
  • Slide 12
  • Slide 13
  • Slide 14
  • Slide 15
  • Slide 16
  • Slide 17
  • Slide 18
  • Slide 19
  • Slide 20
  • Slide 21
  • Authorship
  • Slide 23
  • Slide 24
  • Slide 25
  • Slide 26
  • Slide 27
  • Slide 28
  • Slide 29
  • Slide 30
  • Slide 31
  • Do you feel like this
  • Slide 33
  • The power of
  • Slide 35
  • Can Tweets Predict Citations Metrics of Social Impact Based on Twitter and Correlation with Traditional Metrics of Scientific Impact Gunther Eysenbach
  • Slide 37
  • Altmetrics
  • Slide 39
  • Slide 40
  • Beware of predatory journals
  • Slide 42
  • Slide 43
  • Slide 44
  • Writing for Publication in Nursing and Healthcare Getting It Right
  • Slide 46
  • Slide 47
Page 25: Through the eyes of the editor: nursing research

The odds of an article being highly cited were significantly increased by a mention in social media OR 258 plt0001

020523

Altmetrics

In scholarly and scientific publishing Altmetrics are new metrics proposed as an alternative to the widely used journal impact factor and personal citation indices like the h-index

(Wikipedia)

Beware of predatory journals

Edited by Karen Holland and Roger Watson

An invaluable guide on writing for publication enabling

the reader to develop skills in writing articles book reviews and other forms

of publications written by experts in the field

September 2012 288 pagesISBN

9780470657829pound1999 euro2590 $3295

Order online at wwwwileycomPrefer digital Visit your e-book retailer to order

Writing for Publication in Nursing and Healthcare

Getting It Right

bull High standard rigorous peer reviewbull Quality and reputationbull Immediate open accessbull Fully compliant with all open access mandatesbull Authors retain copyrightndasharticles publish under CC-BY license

Open access research in all aspects of nursingand midwifery practice research education and policy

EditorRoger Watson University of Hull

wwwnursingopenjournalcom

rwatsonhullacuk

0000-0001-8040-7625

rwatson1955

  • PowerPoint Presentation
  • Slide 2
  • Slide 3
  • Quality assurance in the publication process authors editors reviewers publishers
  • Slide 5
  • Slide 6
  • Slide 7
  • Slide 8
  • Slide 9
  • Slide 10
  • Slide 11
  • Slide 12
  • Slide 13
  • Slide 14
  • Slide 15
  • Slide 16
  • Slide 17
  • Slide 18
  • Slide 19
  • Slide 20
  • Slide 21
  • Authorship
  • Slide 23
  • Slide 24
  • Slide 25
  • Slide 26
  • Slide 27
  • Slide 28
  • Slide 29
  • Slide 30
  • Slide 31
  • Do you feel like this
  • Slide 33
  • The power of
  • Slide 35
  • Can Tweets Predict Citations Metrics of Social Impact Based on Twitter and Correlation with Traditional Metrics of Scientific Impact Gunther Eysenbach
  • Slide 37
  • Altmetrics
  • Slide 39
  • Slide 40
  • Beware of predatory journals
  • Slide 42
  • Slide 43
  • Slide 44
  • Writing for Publication in Nursing and Healthcare Getting It Right
  • Slide 46
  • Slide 47
Page 26: Through the eyes of the editor: nursing research

020523

Altmetrics

In scholarly and scientific publishing Altmetrics are new metrics proposed as an alternative to the widely used journal impact factor and personal citation indices like the h-index

(Wikipedia)

Beware of predatory journals

Edited by Karen Holland and Roger Watson

An invaluable guide on writing for publication enabling

the reader to develop skills in writing articles book reviews and other forms

of publications written by experts in the field

September 2012 288 pagesISBN

9780470657829pound1999 euro2590 $3295

Order online at wwwwileycomPrefer digital Visit your e-book retailer to order

Writing for Publication in Nursing and Healthcare

Getting It Right

bull High standard rigorous peer reviewbull Quality and reputationbull Immediate open accessbull Fully compliant with all open access mandatesbull Authors retain copyrightndasharticles publish under CC-BY license

Open access research in all aspects of nursingand midwifery practice research education and policy

EditorRoger Watson University of Hull

wwwnursingopenjournalcom

rwatsonhullacuk

0000-0001-8040-7625

rwatson1955

  • PowerPoint Presentation
  • Slide 2
  • Slide 3
  • Quality assurance in the publication process authors editors reviewers publishers
  • Slide 5
  • Slide 6
  • Slide 7
  • Slide 8
  • Slide 9
  • Slide 10
  • Slide 11
  • Slide 12
  • Slide 13
  • Slide 14
  • Slide 15
  • Slide 16
  • Slide 17
  • Slide 18
  • Slide 19
  • Slide 20
  • Slide 21
  • Authorship
  • Slide 23
  • Slide 24
  • Slide 25
  • Slide 26
  • Slide 27
  • Slide 28
  • Slide 29
  • Slide 30
  • Slide 31
  • Do you feel like this
  • Slide 33
  • The power of
  • Slide 35
  • Can Tweets Predict Citations Metrics of Social Impact Based on Twitter and Correlation with Traditional Metrics of Scientific Impact Gunther Eysenbach
  • Slide 37
  • Altmetrics
  • Slide 39
  • Slide 40
  • Beware of predatory journals
  • Slide 42
  • Slide 43
  • Slide 44
  • Writing for Publication in Nursing and Healthcare Getting It Right
  • Slide 46
  • Slide 47
Page 27: Through the eyes of the editor: nursing research

Beware of predatory journals

Edited by Karen Holland and Roger Watson

An invaluable guide on writing for publication enabling

the reader to develop skills in writing articles book reviews and other forms

of publications written by experts in the field

September 2012 288 pagesISBN

9780470657829pound1999 euro2590 $3295

Order online at wwwwileycomPrefer digital Visit your e-book retailer to order

Writing for Publication in Nursing and Healthcare

Getting It Right

bull High standard rigorous peer reviewbull Quality and reputationbull Immediate open accessbull Fully compliant with all open access mandatesbull Authors retain copyrightndasharticles publish under CC-BY license

Open access research in all aspects of nursingand midwifery practice research education and policy

EditorRoger Watson University of Hull

wwwnursingopenjournalcom

rwatsonhullacuk

0000-0001-8040-7625

rwatson1955

  • PowerPoint Presentation
  • Slide 2
  • Slide 3
  • Quality assurance in the publication process authors editors reviewers publishers
  • Slide 5
  • Slide 6
  • Slide 7
  • Slide 8
  • Slide 9
  • Slide 10
  • Slide 11
  • Slide 12
  • Slide 13
  • Slide 14
  • Slide 15
  • Slide 16
  • Slide 17
  • Slide 18
  • Slide 19
  • Slide 20
  • Slide 21
  • Authorship
  • Slide 23
  • Slide 24
  • Slide 25
  • Slide 26
  • Slide 27
  • Slide 28
  • Slide 29
  • Slide 30
  • Slide 31
  • Do you feel like this
  • Slide 33
  • The power of
  • Slide 35
  • Can Tweets Predict Citations Metrics of Social Impact Based on Twitter and Correlation with Traditional Metrics of Scientific Impact Gunther Eysenbach
  • Slide 37
  • Altmetrics
  • Slide 39
  • Slide 40
  • Beware of predatory journals
  • Slide 42
  • Slide 43
  • Slide 44
  • Writing for Publication in Nursing and Healthcare Getting It Right
  • Slide 46
  • Slide 47
Page 28: Through the eyes of the editor: nursing research

Edited by Karen Holland and Roger Watson

An invaluable guide on writing for publication enabling

the reader to develop skills in writing articles book reviews and other forms

of publications written by experts in the field

September 2012 288 pagesISBN

9780470657829pound1999 euro2590 $3295

Order online at wwwwileycomPrefer digital Visit your e-book retailer to order

Writing for Publication in Nursing and Healthcare

Getting It Right

bull High standard rigorous peer reviewbull Quality and reputationbull Immediate open accessbull Fully compliant with all open access mandatesbull Authors retain copyrightndasharticles publish under CC-BY license

Open access research in all aspects of nursingand midwifery practice research education and policy

EditorRoger Watson University of Hull

wwwnursingopenjournalcom

rwatsonhullacuk

0000-0001-8040-7625

rwatson1955

  • PowerPoint Presentation
  • Slide 2
  • Slide 3
  • Quality assurance in the publication process authors editors reviewers publishers
  • Slide 5
  • Slide 6
  • Slide 7
  • Slide 8
  • Slide 9
  • Slide 10
  • Slide 11
  • Slide 12
  • Slide 13
  • Slide 14
  • Slide 15
  • Slide 16
  • Slide 17
  • Slide 18
  • Slide 19
  • Slide 20
  • Slide 21
  • Authorship
  • Slide 23
  • Slide 24
  • Slide 25
  • Slide 26
  • Slide 27
  • Slide 28
  • Slide 29
  • Slide 30
  • Slide 31
  • Do you feel like this
  • Slide 33
  • The power of
  • Slide 35
  • Can Tweets Predict Citations Metrics of Social Impact Based on Twitter and Correlation with Traditional Metrics of Scientific Impact Gunther Eysenbach
  • Slide 37
  • Altmetrics
  • Slide 39
  • Slide 40
  • Beware of predatory journals
  • Slide 42
  • Slide 43
  • Slide 44
  • Writing for Publication in Nursing and Healthcare Getting It Right
  • Slide 46
  • Slide 47
Page 29: Through the eyes of the editor: nursing research

bull High standard rigorous peer reviewbull Quality and reputationbull Immediate open accessbull Fully compliant with all open access mandatesbull Authors retain copyrightndasharticles publish under CC-BY license

Open access research in all aspects of nursingand midwifery practice research education and policy

EditorRoger Watson University of Hull

wwwnursingopenjournalcom

rwatsonhullacuk

0000-0001-8040-7625

rwatson1955

  • PowerPoint Presentation
  • Slide 2
  • Slide 3
  • Quality assurance in the publication process authors editors reviewers publishers
  • Slide 5
  • Slide 6
  • Slide 7
  • Slide 8
  • Slide 9
  • Slide 10
  • Slide 11
  • Slide 12
  • Slide 13
  • Slide 14
  • Slide 15
  • Slide 16
  • Slide 17
  • Slide 18
  • Slide 19
  • Slide 20
  • Slide 21
  • Authorship
  • Slide 23
  • Slide 24
  • Slide 25
  • Slide 26
  • Slide 27
  • Slide 28
  • Slide 29
  • Slide 30
  • Slide 31
  • Do you feel like this
  • Slide 33
  • The power of
  • Slide 35
  • Can Tweets Predict Citations Metrics of Social Impact Based on Twitter and Correlation with Traditional Metrics of Scientific Impact Gunther Eysenbach
  • Slide 37
  • Altmetrics
  • Slide 39
  • Slide 40
  • Beware of predatory journals
  • Slide 42
  • Slide 43
  • Slide 44
  • Writing for Publication in Nursing and Healthcare Getting It Right
  • Slide 46
  • Slide 47
Page 30: Through the eyes of the editor: nursing research

rwatsonhullacuk

0000-0001-8040-7625

rwatson1955

  • PowerPoint Presentation
  • Slide 2
  • Slide 3
  • Quality assurance in the publication process authors editors reviewers publishers
  • Slide 5
  • Slide 6
  • Slide 7
  • Slide 8
  • Slide 9
  • Slide 10
  • Slide 11
  • Slide 12
  • Slide 13
  • Slide 14
  • Slide 15
  • Slide 16
  • Slide 17
  • Slide 18
  • Slide 19
  • Slide 20
  • Slide 21
  • Authorship
  • Slide 23
  • Slide 24
  • Slide 25
  • Slide 26
  • Slide 27
  • Slide 28
  • Slide 29
  • Slide 30
  • Slide 31
  • Do you feel like this
  • Slide 33
  • The power of
  • Slide 35
  • Can Tweets Predict Citations Metrics of Social Impact Based on Twitter and Correlation with Traditional Metrics of Scientific Impact Gunther Eysenbach
  • Slide 37
  • Altmetrics
  • Slide 39
  • Slide 40
  • Beware of predatory journals
  • Slide 42
  • Slide 43
  • Slide 44
  • Writing for Publication in Nursing and Healthcare Getting It Right
  • Slide 46
  • Slide 47