threatened preterm labour

19
Title: threatened preterm labour Summary 26 years old Malay lady primigravida at 34 th week from period of amenorrhea presented with abdominal pain, slight show, associated with history of two threatened preterm labour due to urinary tract infection and falling, two previous gynaecological surgical histories –endometriosis and ovarian polyps.

Transcript of threatened preterm labour

Page 1: threatened preterm labour

Title: threatened preterm labour

Summary

26 years old Malay lady primigravida at 34th week from period of amenorrhea presented with abdominal pain, slight show, associated with history of two threatened preterm labour due to urinary tract infection and falling, two previous gynaecological surgical histories –endometriosis and ovarian polyps.

Page 2: threatened preterm labour

Introduction

a. Background of the study

Preterm labour is defined as the presence of uterine contractions of sufficient frequency and intensity to effect progressive effacement and dilation of the cervix prior to term gestation (between 20 and 37 wk).

Risk factors for preterm birth include demographic characteristics, behavioural factors, and aspects of obstetric history such as previous preterm birth. Demographic factors for preterm labour include non-white race, extremes of maternal age (<17 y or >35 y), low socioeconomic status, and low pre-pregnancy weight. Preterm labour and birth can be associated with stressful life situations (eg, domestic violence; close family death; insecurity over food, home, or partner; work and home environment) either indirectly by associated risk behaviours.

As the cause of labor still remains elusive, the exact cause of preterm birth is also unsolved. Labor is a complex process involving many factors. Generally, four different pathways have been identified that can result in preterm birth and have considerable evidence: precocious fetal endocrine activation, uterine overdistension, decidual bleeding, and intrauterine inflammation/infection.

b. Rational and significance of choosing the case

Threatened preterm labour is a very hard topic to be study without reference point. Therefore, this case has been selected for study of threatened preterm labour based on few actors; this is not a complicated case of threatened preterm labour, there are multiple factors that may results the threatened preterm labour presentation in this case which includes present presentation and the patient’s history.

Thus, the case itself can be easily said as an example multiple causative case of threatened preterm labour that is very well presented such it can help the researcher to understand and comprehend the meaning of threatened preterm labour.

Page 3: threatened preterm labour

History of Admission

a. Patient’s biography

Name initials : Mdm N.AAge : 26Sex : FemaleReligion : IslamCivil status : marriedRace : MalayOccupation : government officerAdmission : 1/3/2010Clerking : 2/3/2010

b. Chief complaintPatient is currently G1 P0 at 34 weeks 4 days POA. She came by herself, with abdominal pain associated with slight show, no leaking. Fetal movement was present and good.

History of presenting illness

Prior to the admission, patient had history of 2 previous threatened preterm labours due to urinary tract infection at 25+ weeks and from falling at 28 weeks, injuring her right thigh –just involving soft tissue injury.

On the day of admission, patient was doing normal household chores when she suddenly feels sudden back pain similar to the previous threatened preterm labour episodes. The pain was associated with per vaginal bleeding –noted by blood at her sarong. She mentioned that the contraction was not regular and not very consistent.

Immediately, she went to the hospital and admitted into antenatal care for observation.

Page 4: threatened preterm labour

Review of system

system Finding

Cardiovascularno significant findings such as palpitation, lower limb edema, orthopnea, syncope, dizziness, etc.

EndocrineNo significant findings such as moon features, exophthalmos, tremor, acrommegaly, etc.

GastrointestinalNo significant findings such as diarrhea, constipation, altered bowel movement, etc.

GenitourinaryNo significant findings such as dysuria, oliguria, hematouria, incontinence, nocturia, etc.

HematopoieticNo significant findings such as pallor, jaundice or bleeding tendency, etc.

Musculoskeletal No significant findings such as myalgia, arthargia or arthritimyalgia, arthargia or arthritis, etc.s, etc.

NeurologicNo significant findings such as recurrent headaches, fits, blurring of vision or drowsiness, etc.

RespiratoryNo finger clubbing, no accessory muscle used during respiration, no shortness of breath, no noisy breathing, no hemoptysis, no night sweats.

Skin, hair, nailsNo significant findings. The skin color is normal according to his race; with hair growth distribution is normal. Nail is normal, no clubbing, koilonychia, leukonychia, etc.

Head and neckNormal head size, shape and symmetry; no skull enlargement, bossing, etc. no significant findings of the neck such as webbing, goiter, etc.

Reproductive As stated

Page 5: threatened preterm labour

Comprehensive health history

a. Antenatal historyThis is an unplanned but wanted pregnancy. She noticed that she pregnant after had missed about 2 weeks of her period, confirmed by pregnancy test kit. Her L.M.P was 2.7.2009 (sure of date) and E.D.D is 9/4/2010, confirmed by scan. First scan was done at 18th week, and the latest was at 32nd week with parameters corresponds to date. She was screened for VDRL, HIV, hepatitis B and it was negative. She was normortensive, normoglycemic and no significant glycosuria was recorded.

b. Obstetric historyShe is primigravida

c. Gynaecology historyShe attained menarche at 14 years old with regular cycle of 30 days with flow of 7 days. She does not experiencing dysmenorrhoea, menorrhagia, postcoital bleed and no deep dyspareunia. She claimed never took any contraception pill before. She had history of ovarian cyst and went for surgery at HUSM 2005, history of endometriosis and went for surgery at HKL 2006.

d. Past medical & surgical historyNo significant history of medical illness or surgery. 2 previous surgical histories for endometriosis 2006 and ovarian cyst 2005

e. Family historyNo family history of any medical illness except for hypertension by her mother. No history of multiple pregnancies, malformation, or mental illness in the family

f. Social historyShe is working as assistant information officer at ministry of information. Her husband is entrepreneur. She does not consume alcohol and does not smoke, so does her husband. She denies of any constitutional sex. Currently, she is not experiencing any financial difficulty.

g. Allergies and medication historyNo known drug or food allergies. She is taking supplements provided for her pregnancy.

Page 6: threatened preterm labour

Physical examination

She was alert, conscious and lying comfortable. Her height is 155 cm, with pregnant weight of 62+kg. Her body mass index is 25.8 kg/m2. Her vital signs were as recorded;

Blood pressure : 103/72 mmHgHeart rate : 100 beat per minute, good volume, regular rhythmRespiratory rate : 17 breaths per minuteTemperature : 37°C

There is no sign and symptom of anaemia, by pallor or lips cracked. She was well hydrated, no sign of goitre, and there is no oedema at lower limbs. Breast examination was not demonstrated. Her heart sound S1 S2 can be heard with normal intensity, and her lungs were normal.

Examination of abdomen shows distended abdomen by gravid uterus with linea nigra, striae gravidarum as evidences. There were also 2 suture scars which are midline marking for previous endometriosis on 2006 and pfannestiel marking for ovarian cyst removal on 2005. The suture area was non tender, and soft at the site. There was no other abnormality. Her size is near term, SFH is 35cm. The presentation of the baby cephalic, with head engagement is 4/5. Estimated baby weight is about 2.0 – 2.2 kg. Contraction was present which is irregular with 1:10:25s. Fetal heart rate taken by the nurse was 153 beats per minute.

Previous vaginal examination shows normal os, with 1cm dilatation. The cervix was 3cm thick, and the position of the head is not palpable. The membrane is still intact; therefore the mould and caput cannot be assessed. There was no liquor pooling. Speculum examination reveals that the vagina and cervix to be healthy with the os is open. Show is noted, but there was no pooling of liquor, and no vaginal discharge.

Page 7: threatened preterm labour

Summary

26 years old Malay lady primigravida at 34th week from period of amenorrhea presented with abdominal pain, slight show and;1) History of 2 threatened preterm labour2) History of endometriosis 20063) History of ovarian cyst 20054) History of UTI5) History of fall

Diagnosis

Patient is primigravida currently at 34th week 4 days POA diagnosed as threatened preterm labour. Due to;1) Irregular contraction with <2:102) No cervical dilatation3) No pooling of liquor

Investigation

Investigation Reason to support

Full blood count

To look for haemoglobin, white blood cell and platelet levels. To ensure she is stable enough for any emergency surgery, to rule out any ongoing infection, anaemia that may cause poor tolerance of blood loss during delivery.

Grouping, Screening, Hold (GSH) Patient might need transfusion

Urine FEME

Basically, to assess renal function in general. Glucose will be significantly high in EDM, GDM. Blood may present in renal tract trauma, inflammation, tumour or even vaginal bleeding contamination as well.

High vaginal swab C&S

If there is any infection, especially for group B streptococcal, Trichomonas vaginalis, Chlamydia trachomatis, neisseria gonorrhoea. Important in determining management of patient

Page 8: threatened preterm labour

Full blood count

investigation unit reference

Wbc 12.1 109/L 4-10Rbc 4.16 1012/L 3.8-4.8Hgb 124 g/L 120-150Hct 37.1 36-46Mcv 89.2 fL 77-97Mch 29.8 Pg 27-32Mchc 33.4 g/dL 315-345Rdw-cv 13.7 % 11.6-14.0Plt 237 109/L 150-400

% 109/L 109/L

Neutrophil 71 8.59 2-7Lymphocyte 19.6 2.37 1.0-3.0Monocyte 7.5 0.91 0.2-1.0Eosinophil 1.7 0.20 0.02-0.10Basophil 0.2 0.04 0.9-12

CommentDuring pregnancy there is also an increase in white cells from about 7 x 10^9 to 15 x 10^9 per litre solely due to a neutrophilia. This was noted in her CBC & differential blood result. In spite of this, note that other causes of a raised neutrophil count must be excluded. In her case, clinically she is well with no sign or symptoms suggesting active infection.

Urine FEMECommentNo remarkable findings

investigationSpecific gravity 1.020pH 6.5Leukocyte 2+Nitrate -veProtein 1+Glucose 3+Ketone -veBilirubin 1+Erythrocyte -ve

Page 9: threatened preterm labour

HVS C&SCommentOne-third of the pregnant women yielded potential pathogenic organisms in their HVSs. Among these organisms 87% were Monilia and Streptococcus, while the rest were E. coli, Proteus, Klebsiella and Neisseria.Lactobacilli are regarded as a normal flora. Staphylococcus epidermidis and Diphteroids have also been found in significant percentages (30-60%) in pregnant women.

Plan and management

1) Admit antenatal ward2) CTG in ward, IM nubain 10mg per 6 hourly if reactive3) Time contraction4) Strict FKC monitoring5) To book ventilator6) Tocolysis7) IM Dexamethasone 12 mg bd8) Pad chart –to inform if increase in per vaginal bleeding

culture No culture/ colonySmearWhite cell OccasionallyEpithelial cell Occasionally+ cocci nil- cocci few+ bacilli nil- bacilli fewother nil

Page 10: threatened preterm labour

Discussion

Preterm labour is defined as the presence of uterine contractions of sufficient frequency and intensity to effect progressive effacement and dilation of the cervix prior to term gestation (between 20 and 37 wk).

The exact mechanism(s) of preterm labour is largely unknown but is believed to include decidual haemorrhage, (eg, abruption, mechanical factors such as uterine overdistension from multiple gestation or polyhydramnios), cervical incompetence (eg, trauma, cone biopsy), uterine distortion (eg, müllerian duct abnormalities, fibroid uterus), cervical inflammation (eg, resulting from bacterial vaginosis [BV], trichomonas), maternal inflammation/fever (eg, urinary tract infection), hormonal changes (eg, mediated by maternal or fetal stress), and uteroplacental insufficiency (eg, hypertension, insulin-dependent diabetes, drug abuse, smoking, alcohol consumption).1,2

In this case, the patient presented with abdominal pain associated slight show. Patient has strong history suggesting threatened preterm labour with two previous event of threatened preterm labour –history of urinary tract infection in 25 th week, history of falling in 28th week. Patient also had history of two gynaecology surgical history –endometriosis on 2006 and ovarian cyst on 2005.

Usually, based on the patient’s presentation, contractions of sufficient frequency and intensity to effect progressive effacement and dilation of the cervix at 24-37 weeks’ gestation are indicative of active preterm labour. However, the patient in this case was not indicative for preterm labour as the contraction was not consistent and not sufficient.

According to the history, patient had history of urinary tract infection that leads to previous threatened preterm labour in 25+ week of pregnancy. Due to pregnancy, several physiologic changes that occur can cause otherwise healthy women to be more susceptible to serious sequelae from urinary tract infections. These effects have been showed in study done by Duarte et al3 in 2008. Remarkable changes occur in the structure and function of the urinary tract during pregnancy. Blood-volume expansion is accompanied by increases in the glomerular filtration rate (GFR) and urinary output. The ureters undergo tonic relaxation because of the mass production of hormones, particularly progesterone. This loss in tone, along with the increased urinary tract volume, results in urinary stasis that in time promotes bacterial infestation.

Page 11: threatened preterm labour

Preterm labour may be difficult to diagnose and a potential exists for overtreatment of uterine irritability. Tocolytic agents, while generally safe in appropriate dosages with proper clinical monitoring, have potential morbidity and should only be used after consideration of the risks and benefits of such use. Neonatal morbidity and mortality are greatly affected by gestational age, especially when the pregnancy is less than 28 weeks’ gestation.

Tocolytic is the standard management for threatened preterm labour to reduce irregular contraction. Usually, prophylaxis antibiotic will be given to the mother and in case of previous urinary tract infection, antibiotic will be given specifically according to the causative agent.

Conclusion

Threatened preterm labour is defined as sign and symptoms that lead to the risk of preterm labour to occur. It is usually presented with irregular contraction and associated with show or liquor, depending on the patient itself. Even though the mechanism is not clearly understand by physician, patient threatened preterm labour usually associated with history of cervical incompetence –trauma, cervical inflammation –previous infection, hormonal changes –maternal or fetal stress, or uteroplacental insufficiency –hypertension, diabetes, etc.

Page 12: threatened preterm labour

References

1. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. ACOG Practice Bulletin. Assessment of risk factors for preterm birth. Clinical management guidelines for obstetrician-gynecologists. Number 31, October 2001. (Replaces Technical Bulletin number 206, June 1995; Committee Opinion number 172, May 1996; Committee Opinion number 187, September 1997; Committee Opinion number 198, February 1998; and Committee Opinion number 251, January 2001). Obstet Gynecol. Oct 2001;98(4):709-16

2. ACOG practice bulletin. Management of preterm labor. Number 43, May 2003. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. Jul 2003;82(1):127-35.

3. Duarte G, Marcolin AC, Quintana SM, Cavalli RC. [Urinary tract infection in pregnancy]. Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. Feb 2008;30(2):93-100.