Thoughts for Reflection

PPI 2011(baseline for our school)

Spring 2011

ELA CPI

ELA Ex. Cr. Adv+ 10% or more

ELA Ex. Cr. F- 10% or more

ELA Growth

Math CPI

Math Ex. Cr. Adv+ 10% or more

Math Ex. Cr. F- 10% or more

Math Growth

Sci. CPI

Sci. Ex. Cr. Adv+ 10% or more

Sci. Ex. Cr. F- 10% or more

2010 4-Year Cohort Grad. Rate

2009 5-Year Cohort Grad. Rate

2010 Dropout Rate

All Students 100 0 0 75 100 0 0 50 75 0 25 50 50 25

High Needs 100 0 0 75 75 0 0 25 0 0 25 25 25 25

Low Income 100 0 0 75 100 25 0 75 0 0 25 75 75 0

Students with Disabilities 100 0 0 75 0 0 0 25 0 0 25 75 75 0

Afr. Amer./Black 100 0 0 25 100 25 0 75 0 0 25 100 100 50

Hispanic/Latino

White 100 0 25 75 100 0 0 50 75 0 25 75 75 0

Declined (or no extra credit awarded)

No ChangeImproved Below TargetMet TargetExceeded Target (or full extra credit awarded)

PPI 2012

Spring 2012

ELA Gap Narrowing

ELA Ex. Cr. Adv+ 10% or more

ELA Ex. Cr. F- 10% or more

ELA Growth

Math Gap Narrowing

Math Ex. Cr. Adv+ 10% or more

Math Ex. Cr. F- 10% or more

Math Growth

Sci. Gap Narrowing

Sci. Ex. Cr. Adv+ 10% or more

Sci. Ex. Cr. F- 10% or more

2011 4-Year Cohort Grad. Rate

2010 5-Year Cohort Grad. Rate

2011 Dropout Rate

All Students 100 25 25 100 100 25 25 50 100 25 25 75 75 25

High Needs 100 25 25 75 100 25 25 25 100 25 25 75 75 25

Low Income 100 25 25 75 75 25 25 25 100 25 25 75 75 75

Students with Disabilities 100 25 25 75 100 25 25 75 100 25 25 75 75 25

Afr. Amer./Black 100 25 25 75 75 25 25 25 100 25 25 75 100 75

Hispanic/Latino 100 25 25 100 100 25 25 75 75 25 25 31 24 25

White 100 25 25 100 100 25 25 75 100 25 25 75 75 25

Declined (or no extra credit awarded)

No ChangeImproved Below TargetMet TargetExceeded Target (or full extra credit awarded)

Classifying or “Ranking” Schools

Within each grade span category (ES, MS, HS, etc.), schools are percentile ranked on the following individual indicators, for each applicable year (2009-2012) and subject (ELA, math, and science) combination

Achievement Indicators Movement IndicatorsCPI

% Adv% W/F

HS only:Dropout rates

4-year and 5-year grad rates

Median SGP

A composite percentile ranking is created, where:• More recent years carry more weight• Achievement indicators carry 4x more weight than movement indicators

5

Percentile Ranking Recipe

Greater Lawrence Regional VT

Brockton Public Schools

Greater Lowell Regional VT

Southeastern Regional VT

Montachusett Regional VT

Blue Hills Regional VT

Greater New Bedford VT

State

Bristol-Plymouth VT

Greater Fall River VT

Southern Worcester County VT

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

0.4

52.8

4

25.7

1.3

20.8

7.5

8.3

3.7

1.7

0

78

14.4

24.4

12.2

12.3

6.5

15.2

16.1

5.7

3.8

7.7

19.8

26

53.8

57.5

67

67.7

74.2

79.2

87.4

89.2

91.9

22.5

12.8

23.1

24.5

15.6

20.8

9.3

17

14.2

10.6

20.8

79.8

70.8

58.7

55.3

35.1

29.4

52.8

35.2

34.3

45.2

32.6

Af. Am. Asian Hisp. Nat. Am. WhiteHaw. Pac. Mult. Race Non His. Spec. Ed. Low Inc.

WHO ARE OUR STUDENTS?

SCHOOLS WITH THE MOST HIGH RISK POPULA-TIONS:

* Gr. Lawrence* Brockton* Southeastern* Gr. Lowell

ELA Adv ELA Prof ELA NI ELA F Math Adv. Math Prof Math NI Math F0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

8

72

19

1

16

3436

14

31

48

16

5

40

26

20

14

7

73

18

2

19

44

29

8

16

68

14

2

29

38

28

5

Greater Lawrence Regional VT Brockton Public Schools Greater Lowell Regional VT Southeastern Regional VT

Like-Schools with the most High Risk Populations:

**note that ALT assessment students were counted as failures in this data (4/5 for SERSD)

2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 201770.0

75.0

80.0

85.0

90.0

95.0

100.0

90.491.3

92.193.0

93.994.8

85.1

86.4

87.8

89.1

90.5

91.9

74.2

76.5

78.9

81.2

83.6

85.9

89.5

95.2

83.7

86.8

71.8

78.6

SERSD - All Students

ELA CPI Targets Math CPI Targets Science CPI TargetsELA CPI Actual Math CPI Actual Science CPI Actual

Com

posit

e Pe

rfor

man

ce In

dex

2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 201765.0

70.0

75.0

80.0

85.0

90.0

95.0

100.0

88.089.1

90.291.3

92.493.5

80.7

82.4

84.2

85.9

87.7

89.5

69.3

72.1

74.9

77.7

80.5

83.3

86.9

94.0

78.9

83.4

66.5

74.7

SERSD - High Risk

ELA CPI Targets Math CPI Targets Science CPI TargetsELA CPI Actual Math CPI Actual Science CPI Actual

Com

posit

e Pe

rfor

man

ce In

dex

#10The ultimate goal is to have all students

“College and Career Ready”by graduation

#9

The process for planning will involve the Backwards by Design format

#8

Students will need to be offered a variety of assessment types and opportunities

Anchor Standards are NOT content specific

The College and Career Readiness Anchor

Standards detail literacy goals for English, Science, History, and Technical Subjects

•10 Reading Anchor Standards•10 Writing Anchor Standards•6 Speaking & Listening Anchor Standards•6 Language Anchor Standards

Reading, Writing, Speaking & Listening, and Language Standards are specific for

ELA, History, Science, and Technical Subject Areas

All content literacy standards connect through anchor standards

ANCHOR STANDARD pg 47 [R1] : Read closely to determine what the text says explicitly and to make logical inferences from it; cite specific textual evidence when writing or speaking to support conclusions drawn from the text.

Reading ELA Literature pg 50/Informational pg 52 [RL1 & RI1 – 9-10]: Cite strong and thorough textual evidence to support analysis of what the text says explicitly as well as inferences drawn from the text.

Reading History pg 74 [RH1 9-10] : Cite specific textual evidence to support analysis of primary and secondary sources, attending to such features as the date and origin of the information.

Reading Science & Technical Areas pg 75 [RST1 9-10] : Cite specific textual evidence to support analysis of science and technical texts, attending to the precise details of explanations or descriptions.

The greatest overall strength will come from teacher teams and teacher collaboration through anchor

standards to reduce isolation

The new Math Standards are significantly more rigorous than the current standards

#1

Reading, Writing, Speaking and Listening, & Language Standards are

EVERYONE’S Responsibility

Painting & Design

2.A, 2.B, 2.C, 2.E, 2.F, 2.G, 2.H, 2.I

WHST Grades 9-12 #7 Conduct short as well as more sustained research projects to answer a question (including a self-generated question) or solve a problem; narrow or broaden the inquiry when appropriate; synthesize multiple sources on the subject, demonstrating understanding of the subject under investigation.

Performance Example: Students write research papers identifying the characteristics of architectural design styles.

Hospitality

2.E. WHST. 9 – 12.5 Develop and strengthen writing as needed by planning, revising, editing, rewriting, or trying a new approach, focusing on addressing what is most significant for a specific purpose and audience

Performance Example: Using graphic organizers, students will create an organizational chart on the departments on a food

and beverage property. Students will create a flip chart defining job descriptions in the food industry demonstrating clear,

concise, coherent writing.

Cosmetology

2.E.01, 2.D, 2.J, 2.O.02, 2.P.02, 2.Q.01.03, 2.R.01

SL 4 Grades 11 - 12 Present information, findings, and supporting evidence, conveying a clear and distinct perspective, such that listeners can follow the line of reasoning, alternative or opposing perspectives are addressed, and the organization, development, substance, and style are appropriate to purpose, audience, and a range of formal and informal tasks.

Performance Example: Working in groups, students will role play various salon procedures that involve managerial problem solving strategies including, but not limited to, client discussions in which the pros and the cons of various salon services are presented in an effort to help clients make informed aesthetic decisions on a variety of services.

Auto Tech

2B, 2C, 2.E.01, 2H, 2I, 2.J.01, 2.J.02, 2.N.01, 2.O.01 2X, 2.BB.01.05

RST 4 Grades 9-10 Determine the meaning of symbols, key terms, and other domain specific words and phrases as they are used in a specific scientific or technical context relevant to grades 9 – 10 texts and topics.

Performance Example: Students will read and interpret technical charts and symbols, as related to more complex technical

procedures, and apply those specifications to diagnose and repair the vehicle

Engineering

2.A.01 – 2.A.02 2B.01 – 2.B.10 2.C.01-2.C.20

WHST. Grades 6-12.10 Write routinely over extended time frames (time for reflection and revision) and shorter time frames (a single sitting or a day or two) for a range of discipline-specific tasks, purposes, and audiences

Performance Example: Students will create and maintain over a period of time, logs and/or journals that reflect understanding of a variety of professional skills and professional vocabulary. Students will use domain specific vocabulary and demonstrate standard English grammar and usage. Programming and Web

2.A.01.02, 2.A.06.04, 2.A.07.02, 2.A.08.03, 2.B.01.04, 2.B.03.01, 2.B.04.01, 2.B.05.03, 2.B.07.04, 2.C.01.13

WHST Grades 9-10, #7 Conduct short as well as more sustained research projects to answer a question (including a self-generated question) or solve a problem; narrow or broaden the inquiry when appropriate; synthesize multiple sources on the subject, demonstrating understanding of the subject under investigation.

Performance Example: Students will perform a technical task that entails the classifying or comparing and contrasting of career

area topics and explain in writing how they reached their given conclusion and what sources helped lead them to this conclusion.

Heidi Driscoll, Director of Academics

• hdriscoll@sersd.org

• Acondike@doe.mass.edu (Model Curriculum Units)

• modelcurr@doe.mass.edu