Thomas Schnaubelt Executive Director Wisconsin Campus Compact 262-595-2002...
-
Upload
rosa-floyd -
Category
Documents
-
view
213 -
download
1
Transcript of Thomas Schnaubelt Executive Director Wisconsin Campus Compact 262-595-2002...
Thomas SchnaubeltExecutive DirectorWisconsin Campus [email protected]
Overview
WiCC Mission and Philosophy The Engaged Campus Wisconsin Campus Compact
October 22, 2002 to present Vision for the Future
There is a “cascade of statistical evidence documenting a seemingly bottomless disaffection with politics and public affairs among successive cohorts of college students.”
Richard BattistoniCivic Engagement Across the Curriculum, 2002
“Electoral participation of Americans under the age of 25 has declined since 1972, when 18-to-21-year-olds were first permitted to vote. The size of the decline in presidential-election years is between 13 and 15 percentage points (depending on the method of calculation).”
Center for Information and Research on Civic Learning and Engagement, 2002
“While 40 percent of 15-17 year olds have volunteered in the last year, only 21 percent of those ages 18-25 volunteered.”
Data from annual surveys of college freshman over the past 35 years suggest that there has been a recent upswing in interest in political affairs; however, the number of students indicating that politics is “very important” or “essential” remains roughly half (32.9%) of what it was in 1966 (60.3%).
Higher Education Research InstituteUCLA (2002)
Center for Democracy and Citizenship/CIRCLE (2004)
Are College Students Apathetic…or Do They Just Not Care?
1. Creation of good paying jobs.2. Access to affordable college.3. Access to affordable health care.4. The war in Iraq.5. Safety from terrorism.6. Drug and alcohol use.7. Taxes.8. Tolerance for those who are different.9. Discrimination and prejudice.10. Gun violence.
(Center for Information and Research on Civic Learning and Engagement, 2004)
Mission Statement
To strengthen civic engagement and service-
learning partnerships between Wisconsin’s postsecondary
institutions and the communities they serve.
Four Interrelated Areas of Development
Student Community Faculty Campus
Community
Student
Campus
Faculty
WiCC
WiCC Members
Sr. Kathleen O’Brien, Interim President
Alverno College
Sr. Mary Lea Schneider, PresidentCardinal Strich University
F. Gregory Campbell, PresidentCarthage College
James Ebben, PresidentEdgewood College
Stephen Gould, PresidentLakeland College
Richard Warch, PresidentLawrence University
Richard Ridenour, PresidentMarian College
Robert A. Wild, SJ, PresidentMarquette University
Terrance Coffman, PresidentMilwaukee Institute of Art & Design
Robert Greenstreet, Interim ChancellorUW-Milwaukee
Richard Wells, ChancellorUW-Oshkosh
John P. Keating, ChancellorUW-Parkside
Ann Lydecker, ChancellorUW-River Falls
Virginia Helm, Interim ChancellorUW-Stevens Point
Charles W. Sorensen, ChancellorUW-Stout
Julius Erlenbach, ChancellorUW-Superior
John Miller, ChancellorUW-Whitewater
Sam Borden, PresidentGateway Technical College
Rose Ann Findlen, Acting PresidentMadison Area Technical College Carol Brown, PresidentWaukesha County Technical College
Karen Halbersleben, PresidentNorthland College
David C. Joyce, PresidentRipon College
Timothy J. Kriewall, PresidentWisconsin Lutheran College
William Messner, ChancellorUW-Colleges
Donald Mash, ChancellorUW-Eau Claire
Kevin Reilly, ChancellorUW-Extension
Bruce Shepard, ChancellorUW-Green Bay
Douglas Hastad, ChancellorUW-La Crosse
John Wiley, ChancellorUW-Madison
What Makes Wisconsin Campus Compact Unique?
WiCC works across public, private, two-year, four-year and technical educational institutions, and;
WiCC’s primary focus is on higher education’s civic purpose (renewal and reform).
The Engaged Campus
What does it look like?
Components of Engagement
StudentVolunteerism
Co-curricularService
ResourceSharing
Service-Learning
Internships/Coops
ExtensionService
FacultyOutreach
EconomicDevelopment
EngagedCampus
Adapted from Edward Zlotkowski.This list is NOT comprehensive.
Campus CompactIndicators of Engagement
Mission and purpose Administrative/academic leadership External resource allocation----------------------------------------- Disciplines, departments, interdisciplinary work Faculty roles and rewards Internal resource allocation Community voice----------------------------------------- Enabling mechanisms to work with community and faculty Faculty development Integrated and complementary community service activities Forums for fostering public dialogue Pedagogy and epistemology include engagement
Level 1Introductory(Critical Mass Building)
Level 2Intermediate(Quality Building)
Level 3Advanced(Sustained Institutionalization)
Campus Civic Engagement “Predictor” Indicators
Ten of the thirty campus civic engagement indicators were found to be especially strong at “predicting” overall civic engagement strength. In nearly every case, the most engaged campuses performed above average on the following indicators:
1. Scholarship of engagement is valued for faculty.2. Faculty, staff, and students are encouraged to be active in the community.3. Professional development is available to support leadership of all stakeholders
in engagement.4. Multiculturalism is valued as part of campus identity.5. Adequate professional staff and/or coordination exists to effectively support
engagement.6. Faculty development opportunities support engagement.7. Resources are shared in partnerships and joint community development
efforts.8. Recognition/awards exist for exemplary engagement work.9. Service-learning and other community-based forms of education exist
throughout departments/disciplines.10. Communications/PR/publications promote visibility of civic engagement.
Minnesota Campus Compact, 2003
NCA Higher Learning CommissionAccreditation Criterion #5Engagement and Service
5A. The organization learns from the constituencies it serves and analyzes its capacity to serve their needs and expectations.
5B. The organization has the capacity and the commitment to engage with its identified constituencies and communities.
5C. The organization demonstrates its responsiveness to those constituencies that depend on it for service.
5D. Internal and external constituencies value the services the organization provides.
Wisconsin Campus CompactOctober 22, 2002 – present
Events and Gatherings SL and the First Year Experience Workshop SL and Two-Year/Technical Colleges Workshop From the Horse’s Mouth (Johnson Foundation) Raise Your Voice Campaign (February 15 – March 20,
2004) Five Regional Community-Campus Civic Engagement
Summits New Voters Project (March 5, 2004) Wisconsin Engaged Practitioners Meeting (April 12, 2004) 2004 Discipline-Specific Service-Learning Workshops Social Science & Education - Engaged Department
Institute (June 7-8, 2004) K-16 Service-Learning Institute (September 23, 2004) 2004 Student Civic Leadership Institute (September 2004)
Wisconsin Campus CompactGrant Opportunities and Support
Building Social and Economic Capital ($40,000) Citizen Scholar ($2,000-$3,000) Engaged Department ($4,000-$6,000) Raise Your Voice Campaign ($500-$2,000) K-16 AmeriCorps*VISTA Service-Learning Project
35 campus coordinators $163,000 in scholarships
New Voters Project
NOTE: All RFPs and applications are available online at www.wicampuscompact.uwp.edu
Vision for the Future Benchmarks for Student Engagement (NSSE) Comprehensive Assessment of Institutional
Civic Engagement Practices Support for Infrastructure and Enabling
Mechanisms Student and Faculty Fellows/Awards Program Build Public Awareness Move Civic Purpose from Margins to
Mainstream
Fundamental Questions
1. What are the qualities of civic engagement (institutional and individual)?
2. How do we know whether institutions and individuals have these qualities?
3. How can postsecondary institutions serve as more effective stewards of democracy?