Thomas M. Susman,Ppt
-
Upload
guestbc7697 -
Category
Business
-
view
582 -
download
10
description
Transcript of Thomas M. Susman,Ppt
BostonNew YorkPalo Alto
San FranciscoWashington, DC
Freedom of Information And Open GovernmentThomas M. SusmanSantiago, Chile – November 6, 2007
1
Tokyo, Japan
2Ropes & Gray LLP
Freedom of Information Affects Public, Government, and Businesses
• Benefits of open government– To the public, including businesses
– To the government
• Impact on business—– Public disclosure of information submitted
to government by businesses
– Disclosure of agency information to businesses
3Ropes & Gray LLP
Benefits to Public, Including Businesses
• More effective participation in policy formulation by government
• Improved ability to comply with laws
• Commercial, scientific, and environmental benefits
• More competitive procurement and contracting
• More efficient resource allocation
4Ropes & Gray LLP
Benefits to Government
• Higher quality of decision-making
• Improved compliance with laws and regulations
• Greater public confidence in government
• Greater accountability of officials and thus less potential for corruption
5Ropes & Gray LLP
History of U.S. FOIA
• Before the Freedom of Information Act (“FOIA”): principles of transparency respected, but no rights– Constitutional history; democratic ideals– Information disclosed that government
wanted to release– Requester must show particular interest
• Brief history in U.S.– FOIA enacted in 1966, 5 U.S.C. § 552– Subsequent amendments
6Ropes & Gray LLP
Government Disclosure of Business Information Under FOIA
• FOIA legislative history reflects little consideration given by Congress to disclosure of business information
• Text of statute: FOIA disclosure mandate does not apply to—
trade secrets and commercial or financial information obtained from a person and privileged or confidential
7Ropes & Gray LLP
Meaning of FOIA Exemption for Confidential Business Information
• Scope and meaning of exemption unclear on its face
• Courts have interpreted and given substance through many litigated cases
8Ropes & Gray LLP
Meaning of FOIA Exemption for Confidential Business Information
• Commercial information is protected
from disclosure if it is either —– Submitted to the government under
compulsion, when release would cause substantial competitive harm or impair the government’s ability to obtain information; or
– Submitted to the government voluntarily when the information would not customarily be released by the submitter to the public.
9Ropes & Gray LLP
Comparison to Proposed Legislation in Chile and Elsewhere
• Every access-to-information law or regulation respects need for confidentiality of some business information
• Most often identifies “trade secrets” (although the term may have multiple meanings)
10Ropes & Gray LLP
Comparison to Proposed Legislation in Chile and Elsewhere
• Chile’s draft access to government-held information bill would not apply where—
(b) [disclosure] may harm commercial or other economic rights, whether public or private . . . .
(d) [the information] has been obtained from a third party as confidential information. . . .
11Ropes & Gray LLP
Submitter Must be Given Notice Before Disclosure
• Executive Order 12600, issued in 1987, requires notice to submitter and opportunity to comment to agency when request made for information designated by submitter as “confidential”
• Agency has ultimate authority over decision to disclose
12Ropes & Gray LLP
No Balancing or Public Interest Override for Business Information• If information qualifies as trade secret or
confidential commercial information, it must be withheld (through interaction of Trade Secret Act’s confidentiality requirement)
• FOIA has no balancing of benefits to public from disclosure; no matter how great, benefits do not override nondisclosure requirement
• Chile’s proposed law allows withholding only if the “risk of danger outweighs the public interest promoting…disclosure”
13Ropes & Gray LLP
“Reverse-FOIA” Action
• Suit may be brought by submitter against agency to prevent disclosure under FOIA
• Suit under Administrative Procedure Act, not FOIA (therefore burden of proof is on the submitter to justify nondisclosure)
• Court may enjoin agency from disclosing trade secret or confidential commercial information
14Ropes & Gray LLP
When Is FOIA Used by Businesses?
• Public policy advocacy or oversight • Firms under investigation• In litigation with an agency (or private
litigation)• For commercial (competitive)
advantage • Contracting with the government• Rulemakings affecting business• Government benefits, plans, activities
15Ropes & Gray LLP
Business-Use Examples: Discovery of Agency “Secret Law”
• Internal Revenue Service memoranda reflecting agency’s positions to guide personnel
• National Labor Relations Board general counsel memoranda reflecting decisions not to file complaints
• Monetary policy directives by Federal Reserve Board
• Antitrust Division and other government guidance manuals for staff
16Ropes & Gray LLP
Business-Use Examples: Responding to Regulation or Enforcement Activities
• Medical and pharmacological reviews prepared in the course of agency review of new drug applications
• Scientific studies on potential dangers of gasoline additive
• Memoranda reflecting reasons why Federal Trade Commission (FTC) supported staff request for subpoena
• Files of closed customs and antitrust investigations
17Ropes & Gray LLP
Business-Use Examples: Litigation with Agency or with Third-Party
• Use in whistleblower case to obtain company Food & Drug Administration (FDA) filings
• Use in case by Indian tribes against energy companies alleging fraud
• Use by government contractor to obtain investigative report of accident
18Ropes & Gray LLP
Business-Use Examples: Obtaining Information about Competitors
• Reports filed by competing contractors disclosing numbers of employees and types of positions
• Prices and terms contained in government contracts
• Internal efficiency studies• Securities & Exchange Commission (SEC)
and FTC investigative files• FDA, Agriculture Department, and Product
Safety Commission records on products
19Ropes & Gray LLP
Attitude of Businesses Has Changed
• For much of first two decades under FOIA, businesses were hostile toward the law– No required notice or consultation (until 1987)
– Example of mistaken release by Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) of Monsanto’s valuable pesticide formula (1982)
– No distinction between information voluntarily submitted and required to be submitted (until 1992)
– Right to challenge disclosure in court not recognized (until 1979)
20Ropes & Gray LLP
Businesses Now See Value in FOIA
• Businesses and their representatives are now the # 1 users of FOIA
• Agencies afford reasonably predictable protection for trade secrets and confidential information
• Agencies listen to business arguments for nondisclosure
• Businesses in 2007 supported congressional amendments to strengthen disclosure under FOIA
21Ropes & Gray LLP
Also: Government-Required Disclosure by Companies and Individuals
• Many U.S. laws require persons and companies to disclose information to the public
• Information disclosure used to combat business corruption or as regulatory tool; examples include—– SEC (corporate information), FDA (food
and drug research), EPA (pollutants) – Ethics in Government Act (financial
disclosure)
22Ropes & Gray LLP
QUESTIONS?
Thomas M. SusmanRopes & Gray LLP700 Twelfth Street, NWSuite 900Washington, DC [email protected]
7275355_3