Thomas E. Callahan, CPA, CRE, FRICS, MAI Co-President & Chief Executive Officer -West...
-
Upload
drew-ferrar -
Category
Documents
-
view
215 -
download
0
Transcript of Thomas E. Callahan, CPA, CRE, FRICS, MAI Co-President & Chief Executive Officer -West...
Thomas E. Callahan, CPA, CRE, FRICS, MAI
Co-President & Chief Executive Officer -West
San Francisco Hospitality Market Update
April 18, 2012
Where Are We Headed?
San Francisco Lodging Market
2
Historical Occupancy and ADR of theSan Francisco Lodging Market
3
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
$100
$110
$120
$130
$140
$150
$160
$170
$180
$190
$200
35%
45%
55%
65%
75%
85%
$150
$143
$123
$117
$118$125
$138
$149
$156
$134$136
$155
80.3%
64.8%
61.0%
62.7%
67.8% 71.4%72.7%
74.9%
75.0% 71.2%
75.1%
78.9%
2010 RevPAR Growth50 Major Markets
4
New Orleans
New York
Denver
Chicago
Minneapolis
Oahu
San Francisco
Newark
Oakland
Fort Lauderdale
Hartford
Total US
Albuquerque
Kansas City
San Antonio
Salt Lake City
Fort Worth
San Diego
Jacksonville
Sacramento
Austin
Washington DC
Philadelphia
Phoenix
Tucson
Houston
-5.0% -3.0% -1.0% 1.0% 3.0% 5.0% 7.0% 9.0% 11.0% 13.0% 15.0%
Source: Smith Travel Research
2011 RevPAR Growth50 Major Markets
5
San Francisco
Nashville
Miami
Detroit
West Palm Beach
Los Angeles
Newark
Minneapolis
Richmond
Philadelphia
Indianapolis
Fort Worth
Columbus
Cincinnati
Total US
Phoenix
Denver
Fort Lauderdale
Sacramento
Saint Louis
Cleveland
New Orleans
Jacksonville
Memphis
Washington DC
Albuquerque
0.0% 2.0% 4.0% 6.0% 8.0% 10.0% 12.0% 14.0% 16.0% 18.0% 20.0%
Source: Smith Travel Research
San Francisco MSA Economic Assumptions
6
PayrollEmployment
Real Personal Income Real GDP CPI (Inflation)
2009 -5.2% -0.2% -3.7% 0.7%
2010 -1.1% 1.2% 2.2% 1.4%
2011 0.7% 3.5% 1.4% 2.6%
2012F 2.2% 2.3% 4.7% 2.7%
2013F 1.6% 2.3% 2.1% 2.9%
L.R.A. 0.2% 2.9% 1.9% 3.0%
San Francisco MSAAll Hotels
7
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012F 2013F 2014FLong-Run
Average
Occupancy 75.0% 71.2% 75.1% 78.9% 79.7% 79.9% 80.2% 71.9%
% Change 0.1% -5.1% 5.5% 5.1% 0.9% 0.3% 0.5% -
ADR $156.41 $133.52 $136.21 $155.07 $171.17 $181.61 $191.58 -
% Change 5.3% -14.6% 2.0% 13.8% 10.4% 6.1% 5.5% 3.1%
RevPAR $117.25 $95.02 $102.28 $122.42 $136.38 $145.08 $153.73 -
% Change 5.4% -19.0% 7.6% 19.7% 11.4% 6.4% 6.0% 3.7%
Improved Occupancy = Better ADR Performance in 2012
San Francisco MSAUpper-Priced Hotels
8
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012F 2013F 2014FLong-Run
Average
Occupancy 76.3% 73.3% 77.7% 80.6% 80.8% 80.6% 80.7% 73.0%
% Change 0.3% -4.0% 6.0% 3.8% 0.3% -0.3% 0.1% -
ADR $185.46 $157.60 $160.81 $182.53 $201.92 $214.85 $226.63 -
% Change 4.1% -15.0% 2.0% 13.5% 10.6% 6.4% 5.5% 2.5%
RevPAR $141.51 $115.49 $124.88 $147.09 $163.25 $173.22 $182.86 -
% Change 4.4% -18.4% 8.1% 17.8% 11.0% 6.1% 5.6% 3.2%
Improved Occupancy = Better ADR Performance in 2012
San Francisco MSALower-Priced Hotels
9
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012F 2013F 2014FLong-Run
Average
Occupancy 72.5% 67.3% 70.4% 75.9% 77.5% 78.5% 79.4% 69.6%
% Change -0.4% -7.2% 4.6% 7.8% 2.1% 1.3% 1.2% -
ADR $100.29 $85.43 $86.76 $101.36 $111.62 $118.00 $125.32 -
% Change 6.2% -14.8% 1.6% 16.8% 10.1% 5.7% 6.2% 1.9%
RevPAR $72.71 $57.49 $61.09 $76.95 $86.51 $92.63 $99.53 -
% Change 5.8% -20.9% 6.3% 26.0% 12.4% 7.1% 7.4% 2.1%
Improved Occupancy = Better ADR Performance in 2012
San Francisco Projected Performance2012 Quarterly Performance
10
Q1 2012 Q2 2012 Q3 2012 Q4 2012 Annual
Occupancy 71.5% 82.1% 89.4% 75.7% 79.7%
% Change 1.9% 1.1% 0.2% 0.7% 0.9%
ADR $161.70 $166.98 $177.01 $177.71 $171.17
% Change 12.7% 12.4% 8.9% 8.3% 10.4%
RevPAR $115.65 $137.07 $158.16 $134.55 $136.38
% Change 14.9% 13.6% 9.1% 9.0% 11.4%
2011 RevPAR Growth50 Major Markets
11
Miami
New Orleans
Tampa
Los Angeles
Sacramento
Richmond
Boston
Newark
Oahu
Salt Lake City
Austin
Portland
Minneapolis
Cleveland
Long Island
Phoenix
Tucson
Baltimore
Raleigh-Durham
New York
Philadelphia
Kansas City
Denver
Washington DC
Dallas
Fort Worth
0.0% 2.0% 4.0% 6.0% 8.0% 10.0% 12.0% 14.0%
Source: PKF Hospitality Research
San Francisco Hotel Market ADRGrowth at 3% per Year Based on Performance in 2011
12
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
E
2013
E
2014
E
$100
$120
$140
$160
$180
$200
$220
$240
$260
$100
$120
$140
$160
$180
$200
$220
$240
$260
$128 $135
$150
$143
$123
$117 $118
$125
$138
$149
$156
$134$136
$155
$171
$182
$192
$227
San Francisco Major Hotels: Projected Net Operating Income Dollars per Room and Ratio to Total Revenue
13
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
F
2013
F
2014
F$0
$5,000
$10,000
$15,000
$20,000
$25,000
$30,000
$35,000
$40,000
$45,000
$50,000
0.0%
5.0%
10.0%
15.0%
20.0%
25.0%
30.0%
35.0%
40.0%
$28,884
$18,047
$10,386
$7,389$8,273$9,785
$10,922$12,789
$16,355
$7,739$8,435
$12,369
$15,812$17,612
$19,645
37.0%
29.9%
21.1%
15.6%15.8%17.6%18.3%
20.2%
24.3%
14.1%14.7%
20.2%
23.8%25.2%
26.8%
NOI per Room NOI
San Francisco Historical PerformanceOccupancy and RevPAR Correlation
14
Year OCC ADR % Change RevPAR % Change
1995 73.4% $97.35 3.5% $71.43 7.4%
1996 77.8% $105.37 8.2% $81.98 14.8%
1997 79.7% $117.47 11.5% $93.62 14.2%
1998 78.0% $128.15 9.1% $100.02 6.8%
1999 76.4% $134.67 5.1% $102.93 2.9%
2000 80.3% $149.78 11.2% $120.29 16.9%
2001 64.8% $143.09 -4.5% $92.76 -22.9%
2011 and 2012 Major San Francisco Transactions
15
Hotel Property Sale DateSales Price
Price per Room
Cap. Rate
Hotel Milano 4/12 $30.0 M $277,778 1.5%Marriott SFO 3/12 $112.7 M $164,526 6.0%
Hotel Abri 1/12 $21.9 M $240,000 3.8%Huntington Hotel 11/11 $52.5 M $303,571 -Crescent Hotel 11/11 $14.0 M $168,675 5.7%Villa Florence 10/11 $67.2 M $369,231 5.0%
Mandarin Oriental 8/11 $63.0 M $398,734 3.5%Hotel Adagio 7/11 $42.3 M $247,076 3.9%
The Opal Hotel 5/11 $12.8 M $83,882 7.8%Westin Market Street 3/11 $170.0 M $254,873 -
JW Marriott 2/11 $96.0 M $284,866 2.0%Tuscan Inn 2/11 $52.3 M $236,425 6.7%
Argonaut Hotel 2/11 $84.0 M $333,333 5.0%
Some Things To Think About
16
17
1. Personal incomes and corporate profit growth will continue, but at less robust levels. Lodging demand growth in 2012, while still positive, will pale relative to the past two years. Higher room rates will impede demand growth as well.
2. Unemployment will remain high – helps to keep labor costs in check and profit growth up.
3. Oil is a wild card for 2012 – too big an increase will undermine the economy – lodging demand will suffer as a result.
4. Overall, the second half of 2012 will be better than the first half as the future political leadership of the U.S. becomes clear.
Thank You
18