THINK! Drug Drive campaign evaluation · 2015. 8. 17. · 1. 2. 3. About half of respondents...

55
THINK! Drug Drive evaluation © TNS April 2015 THINK! Drug Drive campaign evaluation 29 th April 2015

Transcript of THINK! Drug Drive campaign evaluation · 2015. 8. 17. · 1. 2. 3. About half of respondents...

Page 1: THINK! Drug Drive campaign evaluation · 2015. 8. 17. · 1. 2. 3. About half of respondents recognised some element of the campaign, which represents reasonably strong reach. 4.

THINK! Drug Drive evaluation© TNS April 2015

THINK! Drug Drive campaign evaluation

29th April 2015

Page 2: THINK! Drug Drive campaign evaluation · 2015. 8. 17. · 1. 2. 3. About half of respondents recognised some element of the campaign, which represents reasonably strong reach. 4.
Page 3: THINK! Drug Drive campaign evaluation · 2015. 8. 17. · 1. 2. 3. About half of respondents recognised some element of the campaign, which represents reasonably strong reach. 4.

THINK! Drug Drive evaluation© TNS April 2015

1Overview of key findings

Page 4: THINK! Drug Drive campaign evaluation · 2015. 8. 17. · 1. 2. 3. About half of respondents recognised some element of the campaign, which represents reasonably strong reach. 4.

THINK! Drug Drive evaluation© TNS April 2015

Overview of key findings

1

2

3

About half of respondents recognised some element of the campaign, which represents reasonably strong reach

4

5

Communication was on-target, and information about the new drug driving penalties came through clearly

8

Although the consequences of being stopped for drug driving were found credible, many still have some doubt about the ease with which the police can spot drug drivers on the road

While key metrics have moved among those who have seen the campaign, there is a more modest impact on the campaign’s most direct target (those who know someone who drug drives)

The ads were not considered relevant by most viewers, however, and they did not create a sense of urgency around the issue of drug driving

Page 5: THINK! Drug Drive campaign evaluation · 2015. 8. 17. · 1. 2. 3. About half of respondents recognised some element of the campaign, which represents reasonably strong reach. 4.

THINK! Drug Drive evaluation© TNS April 2015

2Background

Page 6: THINK! Drug Drive campaign evaluation · 2015. 8. 17. · 1. 2. 3. About half of respondents recognised some element of the campaign, which represents reasonably strong reach. 4.

THINK! Drug Drive evaluation© TNS April 2015

Background

The law changed in March 2015 to make it illegal to drive with certain drugs above the specified blood levels in the body.

As such, DfT ran a campaign to inform the public of this change, with 3 key objectives:

- Raise awareness of the new drug drive legislation and build knowledge and understanding of what it means to drivers

- Increase awareness and salience of the consequences of a drug drive conviction

- Increase the belief that you’re likely to be caught and convicted if you drug drive

The primary audience was all adults, to inform the public of the change in legislation. The secondary audience was young males (17-34s) to challenge and deter those that take drugs and drive

Page 7: THINK! Drug Drive campaign evaluation · 2015. 8. 17. · 1. 2. 3. About half of respondents recognised some element of the campaign, which represents reasonably strong reach. 4.
Page 8: THINK! Drug Drive campaign evaluation · 2015. 8. 17. · 1. 2. 3. About half of respondents recognised some element of the campaign, which represents reasonably strong reach. 4.
Page 9: THINK! Drug Drive campaign evaluation · 2015. 8. 17. · 1. 2. 3. About half of respondents recognised some element of the campaign, which represents reasonably strong reach. 4.

THINK! Drug Drive evaluation© TNS April 2015

70

49

46

21

15

15

8

70

48

47

21

20

14

8

Control - postControl - pre

51

42

34

17

16

11

8

59

43

38

21

19

15

9

Drive over the speed limit

Use a mobile phone to textwhile driving

Drive too fast for theconditions

Drive over the legal alcohollimit

Don't use seatbelts whilesitting in the front of the car

Drive after taking recreationaldrugs such as cannabis,

cocaine, and ecstasy

Drive without insurance/MOT

Pilot - post

Pilot - pre

(*)

(*)

6

Q2a. Do you know anyone who does any of the following nowadays?Base: All males 17-29 Pre/Post (Pilot : 500/499, Control: 400/395)*denotes significant difference from pre to post

%

About one in seven respondents know someone who drives after taking recreational drugs.

*

Page 10: THINK! Drug Drive campaign evaluation · 2015. 8. 17. · 1. 2. 3. About half of respondents recognised some element of the campaign, which represents reasonably strong reach. 4.

THINK! Drug Drive evaluation© TNS April 2015

General publicity and campaign awareness

*

*

6

3

Page 11: THINK! Drug Drive campaign evaluation · 2015. 8. 17. · 1. 2. 3. About half of respondents recognised some element of the campaign, which represents reasonably strong reach. 4.

THINK! Drug Drive evaluation© TNS April 2015

70

31

20

15

15

14

13

12

12

11

11

57

22

18

16

8

16

13

12

13

7

9

SEEN ANYTHING (NET)

TV advert

TV news

Social media

Radio advert

Internet/a website (e.g.Youtube)

Road signs

Posters in pub toilets

National newspaper

Poster on bus

Local newspaper

Pilot - post

Pilot - Pre

70

30

24

18

12

21

12

12

13

6

11

62

21

19

17

9

16

14

13

10

6

7

Control - post

Control - pre

6

Q3a. Have you seen or heard anything about taking drugs and driving in any of these ways recently? Base: All males 17-29 Pre/Post (Pilot : 500/499, Control: 400/395)*denotes significant difference from pre to post

Majority have seen something on drug driving, with TV advert the primary source of awareness, although radio also had some impact in the test region

%

*

*

*

*

**

Page 12: THINK! Drug Drive campaign evaluation · 2015. 8. 17. · 1. 2. 3. About half of respondents recognised some element of the campaign, which represents reasonably strong reach. 4.

THINK! Drug Drive evaluation© TNS April 2015

7

4

14

6

8

6

10

1

3

2

11

0

13

6

8

0

9

4

0

5

Control - post

Control - pre

11

10

9

9

7

6

4

4

4

2

12

0

12

5

7

0

7

5

0

6

Mentions of where seen eg.TV/poster

Changes in the law

It's dangerous / it cankill/cause accidents

Don't take drugs / take drugsand drive

Don't do it (no further detail)

Drug tests (at the roadside)

Shocking / hard hitting /graphic

Good advert / message works

A paranoid driver (aftertaking drugs)

It's bad / wrong

Pilot - post

Pilot - Pre

(*)

(*)

6

Q3b. What do you remember about the publicity and advertising for taking drugs and driving? Base: All who have seen/heard drug drive publicity Pre/Post (Pilot : 284/350, Control: 246/275)*denotes significant difference from pre to post

About one in ten in the test region recalled ‘changes in the law’ when thinking of recent advertising. Other mentions were more general

%

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

Page 13: THINK! Drug Drive campaign evaluation · 2015. 8. 17. · 1. 2. 3. About half of respondents recognised some element of the campaign, which represents reasonably strong reach. 4.

THINK! Drug Drive evaluation© TNS April 2015

9 7

2823

Pilot Control

Pre Post

%

Q12: Have you seen or heard anything recently about changes to drug driving legislation?Base: All males 17-29 Pre/Post (Pilot : 500/499, Control: 400/395)*denotes significant difference from pre to post

People in both regions were more likely to have seen/heard publicity relating to the changes in drug driving legislation at the post stage

**

13

Page 14: THINK! Drug Drive campaign evaluation · 2015. 8. 17. · 1. 2. 3. About half of respondents recognised some element of the campaign, which represents reasonably strong reach. 4.

THINK! Drug Drive evaluation© TNS April 2015

21

10

9

12

11

7

0

5

5

4

7

0

0

6

0

0

0

0

0

6

Control - post

Control - pre

17

15

13

11

6

6

4

3

3

3

6

0

0

2

0

0

0

0

0

10

Laws is changing/ there are newlaws

Police can now test you for drugs(at roadside)

Easier to catch/convict/prosecutedrug drivers

Greater punishments

Radio/TV ads

New powers to police

Good/Like

Illegal to drive after taking drugs

New law regarding prescriptiondrugs and driving

Bigger fines

Pilot - post

Pilot - pre

(*)

(*)

6

Q13: What have you seen or heard recently about the changes to drug driving legislation? (spontaneous)Base: All who had seen something recently about the changes to drug drive legisation Pre/Post (Pilot : 45/137, Control: 29/85) CAUTION LOW BASE SIZES *denotes significant difference from pre to post

Aside from the law changing, people were aware of the roadside test and the fact that it is now easier to catch drug drivers

%

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

Page 15: THINK! Drug Drive campaign evaluation · 2015. 8. 17. · 1. 2. 3. About half of respondents recognised some element of the campaign, which represents reasonably strong reach. 4.

THINK! Drug Drive evaluation© TNS April 2015

52

34

2319 16 13

44

27

1318

11 8

Any Online video ad Any radio ad Press ad Poster ad Online ad

Pilot Control

Around half in the pilot region recognised an ad, although recognition was relatively high in the control region as well

%

Q15a: Have you seen this film before? / Q16ai/16aii: Have you heard this advert on the radio recently?/ Q16b. Have you seen this advert in the newspaper recently? Q16c. Have you seen this poster recently?/Q16d. Have you seen this advert on the internet recently?Base: All males 17-29 post (Pilot : 499, Control: 395)*denotes significant difference from pilot to control

*

*

** *

15

Page 16: THINK! Drug Drive campaign evaluation · 2015. 8. 17. · 1. 2. 3. About half of respondents recognised some element of the campaign, which represents reasonably strong reach. 4.

THINK! Drug Drive evaluation© TNS April 2015

53

41

21

20

47

36

20

13

On YouTube

On catch up TV

Online but not sure where

Social media

Pilot

Control

(*)

(*)

Q15b: Where have you seen this film before? Base: All who had seen the film post (Pilot : 164, Control: 99 )*denotes significant difference between pilot and control

More respondents recalled having seen the video ad, the most-recognised of the campaign touchpoints, on YouTube

%

16

Page 17: THINK! Drug Drive campaign evaluation · 2015. 8. 17. · 1. 2. 3. About half of respondents recognised some element of the campaign, which represents reasonably strong reach. 4.

THINK! Drug Drive evaluation© TNS April 2015

Q16ai/16aii: Have you heard this advert on the radio recently?Base: All males 17-29 post (Pilot : 499, Control: 395)*denotes significant difference between pilot and control

People in the pilot region were more likely to recognise the radio ad, with recognition very similar for each of the ads

2319 17

13 10 8

Any Reassure Sirens

Pilot Control

%

** *

17

Page 18: THINK! Drug Drive campaign evaluation · 2015. 8. 17. · 1. 2. 3. About half of respondents recognised some element of the campaign, which represents reasonably strong reach. 4.

THINK! Drug Drive evaluation© TNS April 2015

Campaign communication and response

*

*

6

4

Page 19: THINK! Drug Drive campaign evaluation · 2015. 8. 17. · 1. 2. 3. About half of respondents recognised some element of the campaign, which represents reasonably strong reach. 4.

THINK! Drug Drive evaluation© TNS April 2015

37

19

17

12

8

6

4

3

3

3

34

23

22

15

11

9

4

2

4

2

Do not take drugs and drive

The (drug/driving) law haschanged/become stricter

You will be caught/Can be caughtat anytime (more easily)

Stiffer penalties (all references)

You will be prosecuted/convicted(more easily)

Police now have morepower/clamping down on you

Telling people of theconsequences

You will get a criminal record

Don't take drugs

Drug driving is a serious offence/illegal’

Pilot

Control

(*)

(*)

Q17: Thinking about all of the different advertising you have just seen and heard, what do you think was its main message? (spontaneous)Base: All males 17-29 post (Pilot : 499, Control: 395)*denotes significant difference between pilot and control

The perceived main message of the campaign advertising was fairly general, although increased powers to detect and prosecute drug drivers did come through fairly clearly

%

20

Page 20: THINK! Drug Drive campaign evaluation · 2015. 8. 17. · 1. 2. 3. About half of respondents recognised some element of the campaign, which represents reasonably strong reach. 4.

THINK! Drug Drive evaluation© TNS April 2015

43

39

38

37

33

31

27

27

13

12

9

4

44

55

44

43

32

31

27

33

16

14

12

4

They made me think drug driving is a serious issue

They made me think it is easier to convict someone caught drugdriving

They made me think it is now more likely you will get caught if youtake drugs and drive

They would make people think twice about driving after takingrecreational drugs

They told me something important

They told me something new

They would stick in my mind

They made me think about the impact that taking drugs anddriving could have on my future

They are aimed at people like me and my friends

They would prompt me to talk to my friends about the issue ofdriving after taking recreational drugs

I found them irritating

I found them confusing

Pilot

Control

(*)(*)

Q18: Here are some things that other people have said about the film and the adverts you have just seen and heard. Which of these do YOU personally feel about these adverts? Base: All males 17-29 post (Pilot : 499, Control: 395)*denotes significant difference between pilot and control

%

The ease of being caught/convicted for drug driving was taken out as a clear message, but few saw the campaign as relevant

*

21

Page 21: THINK! Drug Drive campaign evaluation · 2015. 8. 17. · 1. 2. 3. About half of respondents recognised some element of the campaign, which represents reasonably strong reach. 4.

THINK! Drug Drive evaluation© TNS April 2015

73

65

64

21

13

6

4

3

82

75

71

30

17

6

2

3

A fine of up to £5000

A minimum of 12months' driving ban

A criminal record

Up to 6 months in prison

Points on driving licence

A fine of up to £1000

Verbal warning

Written warning

Pilot

Control

(*)

(*)

Q20: The adverts mentioned various penalties that may be incurred by driving after taking drugs. Which if any of the following were mentioned?Base: All males 17-29 post (Pilot : 499, Control: 395)*denotes significant difference between pilot and control

%

The three penalties mentioned were recalled well

*

*

*

*

22

Page 22: THINK! Drug Drive campaign evaluation · 2015. 8. 17. · 1. 2. 3. About half of respondents recognised some element of the campaign, which represents reasonably strong reach. 4.

THINK! Drug Drive evaluation© TNS April 2015

Q21: How believable did you find the message in these adverts?Base: All males 17-29 post (Pilot : 499, Control: 395)*denotes significant difference between pilot and control

The ads were considered credible

Believable (net)

Very believable

Quite believable

Not particularly believable

Not at all believable

Not believable (net)

Bel

ieva

ble

Not

bel

ieva

ble

Don’t know 5 1%

x

x

48 44

35 46

10 9

8390

12 9

Pilot Control

*

*

23

Page 23: THINK! Drug Drive campaign evaluation · 2015. 8. 17. · 1. 2. 3. About half of respondents recognised some element of the campaign, which represents reasonably strong reach. 4.

THINK! Drug Drive evaluation© TNS April 2015

4 13 213 12

35 35

8 3

48 47

Pilot Control

More likely (net)

Much more likely

A bit more likely

A little less likely

Much less likely

Less likely (net)

Q22a: What effect, if any, has seeing and hearing these adverts had on how likely you would be to drive after taking Base: All males 17-29 post (Pilot : 499, Control: 395)*denotes significant difference between pilot and control

About half of respondents said that the ads would make them less likely to drive after taking drugs

Bel

ieva

ble

Not

bel

ieva

ble

Don’t know/no

difference45 49

%

x

x

*

24

Page 24: THINK! Drug Drive campaign evaluation · 2015. 8. 17. · 1. 2. 3. About half of respondents recognised some element of the campaign, which represents reasonably strong reach. 4.

THINK! Drug Drive evaluation© TNS April 2015

*

*

6

5Attitudes towards recreational drugs and driving

Page 25: THINK! Drug Drive campaign evaluation · 2015. 8. 17. · 1. 2. 3. About half of respondents recognised some element of the campaign, which represents reasonably strong reach. 4.

THINK! Drug Drive evaluation© TNS April 2015 6

Driving after taking class A drugs is considered the most unacceptable of the driving behaviours examined

80

61

58

48

59

38

35

30

20

20

9

82

62

60

54

58

42

36

30

27

25

9 Control - post Control - pre

74

56

54

48

47

45

37

32

27

22

13

78

59

55

46

54

46

40

34

25

26

15

Driving after takingclass A drugs

Driving after smokingcannabis

Using mobile phone totext while driving

Using mobile phonewithout hands-free kitDriving without motor

insuranceDriving when unsure ifover the legal alcohol…Driving without a valid

MOT certificateDriving after drinking

two pintsCarry on driving when

too tiredDriving 40mph in a

30mph areaUsing mobile phonewith hands-free kit Pilot - post Pilot - pre

(*)

(*)

Q1c: You are now going to see some various types of behaviour and for each one please state how acceptable or unacceptable you think it is for people to do these things, using the scores on the screen. A score of one means you think the behaviour is fairly acceptable and a score of five means you think it is extremely unacceptable, or you can use one of the numbers in between.Base: All males 17-29 Pre/Post (Pilot : 500/499, Control: 400/395) *denotes significant difference from pre to post

% - extremely unacceptable

*

*

Page 26: THINK! Drug Drive campaign evaluation · 2015. 8. 17. · 1. 2. 3. About half of respondents recognised some element of the campaign, which represents reasonably strong reach. 4.

THINK! Drug Drive evaluation© TNS April 2015

87

79

60

58

56

59

49

46

39

41

44

86

78

59

57

53

56

51

50

40

42

43

Control - post

Control - pre

81

77

60

60

57

59

50

50

48

51

46

46

79

73

58

57

53

53

52

47

44

43

43

42

Drink Driving

Drug Driving

Use of mobile phones

Motorcycle accidents

Not wearing seatbelts

Drivers not fullyconcentrating

Driving while tired

Not using childrestraints

Road rage

Speeding

Tail gating

Child road awareness

Pilot - post

Pilot - pre

(*)

(*)

6

Q1b: To what extent do you agree that each of the following are dangerous? Base: All males 17-29 Pre/Post (Pilot : 500/499, Control: 400/395)*denotes significant difference from pre to post

Drug driving is also viewed as a very dangerous behaviour, similar to drink driving

% - agree strongly

*

Page 27: THINK! Drug Drive campaign evaluation · 2015. 8. 17. · 1. 2. 3. About half of respondents recognised some element of the campaign, which represents reasonably strong reach. 4.

THINK! Drug Drive evaluation© TNS April 2015

81

67

52

22

25

16

14

82

67

56

26

30

19

17

Control - post

Control - pre

71

63

56

29

27

21

21

73

62

52

27

29

22

20

Drive over the speedlimit

Drive too fast forconditions

Use a mobile phone totext while driving

Don't use seatbeltswhen sitting in the

front of car

Drive when over thelegal alcohol limit

Drive after takingrecreational drugs

Drive withoutinsurance/MOT

Pilot - post

Pilot - pre

(*)

(*)

6

Q2b: How normal do you think it is for people your age to do the following? Base: All males 17-29 Pre/Post (Pilot : 500/499, Control: 400/395)*denotes significant difference from pre to post

Most people, however, do not view drug driving as normal

% - quite normal/very normal

Page 28: THINK! Drug Drive campaign evaluation · 2015. 8. 17. · 1. 2. 3. About half of respondents recognised some element of the campaign, which represents reasonably strong reach. 4.

THINK! Drug Drive evaluation© TNS April 2015

31

21

12

7

6

2

7

3

3

2

30

15

18

11

6

4

3

2

4

3

Control - post

Control - pre

28

16

11

10

5

5

5

4

3

3

27

18

10

13

6

4

5

3

3

2

Drink driving

Use of mobile phones

Drivers not fullyconcentrating

Speeding

Tail gating

Road rage

Drug driving

Child road awareness

Driving while tired

Not wearing seatbelts

Pilot - post

Pilot - pre

(*)

(*)

6

Q1a: Thinking about road safety, which one of the following issues do you consider to be the MOST important issue that the Government should address to improve road safety?Base: All males 17-29 Pre/Post (Pilot : 500/499, Control: 400/395)*denotes significant difference from pre to post

Consequently, drug driving is considered a relatively low priority compared to other road safety issues

%

*

*

*

Page 29: THINK! Drug Drive campaign evaluation · 2015. 8. 17. · 1. 2. 3. About half of respondents recognised some element of the campaign, which represents reasonably strong reach. 4.

THINK! Drug Drive evaluation© TNS April 2015

Expected outcomes

*

*

6

6

Page 30: THINK! Drug Drive campaign evaluation · 2015. 8. 17. · 1. 2. 3. About half of respondents recognised some element of the campaign, which represents reasonably strong reach. 4.

THINK! Drug Drive evaluation© TNS April 2015

There is some doubt that the police can easily spot a driver who has taken drugs

Q5b: How easy do you think it is for the police to spot a driver who has taken recreational drugs?Base: All males 17-29 Pre/Post (Pilot : 500/499, Control: 400/395)*denotes significant difference from pre to post

*

*

6

34 29 32 35

11 12 8 7

43 47 51 51

5 5 3 3

46 41 41 41

47 52 54 54

Pre Post Pre Post

Easy (net)

Very easy

Fairly easy

Not very easy

They cannot tell

Not easy (net)

Don’t know 7 7 6 5%

x

x

Easy

Not

eas

y

Pilot Control

Page 31: THINK! Drug Drive campaign evaluation · 2015. 8. 17. · 1. 2. 3. About half of respondents recognised some element of the campaign, which represents reasonably strong reach. 4.

THINK! Drug Drive evaluation© TNS April 2015

Therefore only half think it is likely that drug drivers will get stopped by the police

Q5a: How likely do you think it is that someone who drives after taking recreational drugs would get stopped by the police? Base: All males 17-29 Pre/Post (Pilot : 500/499, Control: 400/395)*denotes significant difference from pre to post

*

*

6

35 38 35 39

15 1610 9

36 33 40 41

8 79 6

50 5445 48

44 4049 47

Pre Post Pre Post

Likely (Net)

Very likely

Somewhat likely

Not very likely

Not at all likely

Unlikely (Net)

Like

lyU

nlik

ely

Don’t know 6 6 5 5%

x

x

Pilot Control

Page 32: THINK! Drug Drive campaign evaluation · 2015. 8. 17. · 1. 2. 3. About half of respondents recognised some element of the campaign, which represents reasonably strong reach. 4.

THINK! Drug Drive evaluation© TNS April 2015

Pilot Control

However, once stopped, most believe it is easy for police to identify drug drivers

Q6: If stopped, how easy do you think it is for the police to tell if someone has taken recreational drugs?Base: All males 17-29 Pre/Post (Pilot : 500/499, Control: 400/395)*denotes significant difference from pre to post

*

*

6

51 50 50 49

25 27 29 33

17 16 15 143 2 2 1

76 77 78 82

19 18 17 15

Pre Post Pre Post

Easy

Not

eas

y

Don’t know 5 5 4 3%

x

x

Easy (net)

Very easy

Fairly easy

Not very easy

They cannot tell

Not easy (net)

Page 33: THINK! Drug Drive campaign evaluation · 2015. 8. 17. · 1. 2. 3. About half of respondents recognised some element of the campaign, which represents reasonably strong reach. 4.

THINK! Drug Drive evaluation© TNS April 2015

…and if charged, the vast majority believe a conviction is likely

Q8: If charged by the police, what do you think is the likelihood of getting convicted for driving after taking recreational drugs?Base: All males 17-29 Pre/Post (Pilot : 500/499, Control: 400/395)*denotes significant difference from pre to post

*

*

6

36 39 41 38

39 38 37 41

16 14 14 165 4 3 2

74 76 78 79

20 18 17 19

Pre Post Pre Post

Like

lyU

nlik

ely

Don’t know 5 6 5 3%

x

x

Likely (Net)

Very likely

Somewhat likely

Not very likely

Not at all likely

Unlikely (Net)

Pilot Control

Page 34: THINK! Drug Drive campaign evaluation · 2015. 8. 17. · 1. 2. 3. About half of respondents recognised some element of the campaign, which represents reasonably strong reach. 4.

THINK! Drug Drive evaluation© TNS April 2015

41

37

36

34

31

29

25

13

39

37

33

0

30

28

27

12

A minimum of 12 months'driving ban

Points on driving licence

A fine of up to £5000

A criminal record

Fine

Up to 6 months in prison

Same as Drink Driving

Same as for drug possessionPilot - post

Pilot - pre

(*)

(*) 43

46

40

40

36

37

35

13

43

37

34

0

32

30

28

11

Control - post

Control - pre

6

Q9b. What do you think the current penalty is if convicted for driving after taking recreational drugs? (prompted)Base: All males 17-29 Pre/Post (Pilot : 500/499, Control: 400/395)*denotes significant difference from pre to post

Even when prompted, there is little impact on knowledge of drug driving penalties over the campaign period

%

Not asked Not asked

*

*

*

Page 35: THINK! Drug Drive campaign evaluation · 2015. 8. 17. · 1. 2. 3. About half of respondents recognised some element of the campaign, which represents reasonably strong reach. 4.

THINK! Drug Drive evaluation© TNS April 2015

78

73

73

73

68

63

63

62

58

54

51

50

37

80

69

74

71

68

63

61

68

59

51

46

44

39

Insurance cost would increase

12 month driving ban

Family/partner would bedisappointed

Get a criminal record

Harder to get/keep a job

Up to £5000 fine

Would have trouble getting visa

Conviction recorded on license for11 years

Would be ashamed

People would find out

Up to 6 months imprisonment

Lifestyle would changedramatically

Would have to sell car

Pilot - post

Pilot - pre

(*)

(*)

6

The 12-month driving ban and criminal record are viewed as more likely outcomes than the £5000 fine

89

78

79

81

74

68

76

71

64

52

52

53

40

86

74

77

81

71

62

69

67

57

49

51

47

38

Control - post

Control - pre

Q10: If someone were to be caught driving after taking recreational drugs, how likely do you think it would be that each of the following would happen?Base: All males 17-29 Pre/Post (Pilot : 500/499, Control: 400/395)*denotes significant difference from pre to post

% likely (net)

*

*

*

Page 36: THINK! Drug Drive campaign evaluation · 2015. 8. 17. · 1. 2. 3. About half of respondents recognised some element of the campaign, which represents reasonably strong reach. 4.

THINK! Drug Drive evaluation© TNS April 2015

59

53

44

47

41

45

39

33

34

30

24

28

19

55

51

49

48

45

50

42

34

39

36

21

27

16

Control - post

Control - pre

51

46

41

39

38

37

34

29

28

26

24

22

15

47

43

42

37

39

40

31

30

31

26

21

21

12

Getting a criminal record

Being given up to 6 monthsimprisonment

Being given up to a £5000 fine

It would be harder to get a job orkeep a job

My family/partner would bedisappointed

Being given a 12 month drivingban

My insurance cost would increase

My drug driving conviction wouldbe recorded on my driving…

I would be ashamed of having adrug drive conviction

I would be ashamed that peoplewould find out I had taken drugs

My lifestyle would changedramatically

I may have trouble getting a visafor some countries

I would have to sell my car

Pilot - post

Pilot - pre

(*)

(*)

6

Q11: Imagine you were to be caught driving after taking recreational drugs, which of the following would you be most likely to worry about happening? Base: All males 17-29 Pre/Post (Pilot : 500/499, Control: 400/395)*denotes significant difference from pre to post

People worry more about the practical than the social consequences of being caught drug driving, with ‘Getting a criminal record’ the top concern BUT disappointed family is also a worry

%

Page 37: THINK! Drug Drive campaign evaluation · 2015. 8. 17. · 1. 2. 3. About half of respondents recognised some element of the campaign, which represents reasonably strong reach. 4.

THINK! Drug Drive evaluation© TNS April 2015

Focus on ad recognisers

*

*

6

7

Page 38: THINK! Drug Drive campaign evaluation · 2015. 8. 17. · 1. 2. 3. About half of respondents recognised some element of the campaign, which represents reasonably strong reach. 4.

THINK! Drug Drive evaluation© TNS April 2015

74

66

61

33

30

25

27

68

60

50

24

23

16

15

Drive over the speed limit

Drive too fast for conditions

Use a mobile phone to text whiledriving

Don't use seatbelts when sittingin the front of car

Drive when over the legal alcohollimit

Drive after taking recreationaldrugs

Drive without insurance/MOT

Recognisers

Non-recognisers

(*)(*)

6

Q2b: How normal do you think it is for people your age to do the following? Base: All males 17-29 post-stage, pilot region (recognisers: 254, non-recognisers: 245)*denotes significant difference between ad recognisers and non recognisers

Driving after taking recreational drugs is considered a bit more normal among ad recognisers

% very/quite normal

*

*

*

*

Page 39: THINK! Drug Drive campaign evaluation · 2015. 8. 17. · 1. 2. 3. About half of respondents recognised some element of the campaign, which represents reasonably strong reach. 4.

THINK! Drug Drive evaluation© TNS April 2015

86

81

77

77

73

73

67

65

61

49

25

85

79

75

78

75

71

65

60

63

53

30

Drive after taking class A drugs

Use mobile phone to text while driving

Drive after smoking cannabis

Use mobile without hands-free kit

Drive when unsure if over the legal limit

Drive without insurance

Drive without MOT

Drive after drinking 2 pints

Carry on driving when too tired

Drive at 40mph in a 30mph area

Use mobile with hands-free kit

Non-recognisers

Recognisers

6

Q1c How acceptable to do you think it is to do the following?Base: All males 17-29 post-stage, pilot region (recognisers: 254, non-recognisers: 245)*denotes significant difference between ad recognisers and non recognisers

This group do not consider driving after taking drugs to be more acceptable, however

% unacceptable

Page 40: THINK! Drug Drive campaign evaluation · 2015. 8. 17. · 1. 2. 3. About half of respondents recognised some element of the campaign, which represents reasonably strong reach. 4.

THINK! Drug Drive evaluation© TNS April 2015

63

47

83 81

45

34

71 71

Likelihood of gettingstopped by police

Easy for the police to spotdriver who has taken

drugs

If stopped, how easy forpolice to tell a driver has

taken drugs

If charged, how likely tobe convicted

Recognisers Non-recognisers

Those who recognise at least one element of the campaign are significantly more confident that the police can identify and convict drug drivers

% very/somewhat likely/easy

*

Q5a How likely do you think it is that someone who drives after taking recreational drugs would get stopped by the police? Q5b How easy do you think it is for the police to spot a driver who has taken recreational drugs? Q6 If stopped, how easy do you think it is for the police to tell if someone has taken recreational drugs? Q8 If charged, what do you think is the likelihood of getting convicted for drug driving?Base: All males 17-29 post-stage, pilot region (recognisers: 254, non-recognisers: 245) *denotes significant difference between ad recognisers and non recognisers

*

*

*

*

43

Page 41: THINK! Drug Drive campaign evaluation · 2015. 8. 17. · 1. 2. 3. About half of respondents recognised some element of the campaign, which represents reasonably strong reach. 4.

THINK! Drug Drive evaluation© TNS April 2015

45

37

43

39

31

33

22

17

9

5

2

36

36

28

28

32

26

27

8

5

4

2

A minimum of 12 months' driving ban

Points on driving licence

A fine of up to £5000

A criminal record

Fine

Up to 6 months in prison

Same as Drink Driving

Same as for drug possession

Verbal warning

Written warning

There is no penalty

Recognisers

Non-recognisers

(*)(*)

6

Q9b. What do you think the current penalty is if convicted for driving after taking recreational drugs? (prompted)Base: All males 17-29 post-stage, pilot region (recognisers: 254, non-recognisers: 245)*denotes significant difference between ad recognisers and non recognisers

Campaign recognisers also show significantly clearer knowledge of drug driving penalties

%

*

**

*

Page 42: THINK! Drug Drive campaign evaluation · 2015. 8. 17. · 1. 2. 3. About half of respondents recognised some element of the campaign, which represents reasonably strong reach. 4.

THINK! Drug Drive evaluation© TNS April 2015

79

75

74

76

72

67

67

63

59

55

54

54

40

77

71

73

69

64

57

58

60

55

52

48

45

34

Insurance cost would increase

12 month driving ban

Family/partner would be disappointed

Get a criminal record

Harder to get/keep a job

£5000 fine

Would have trouble getting visa

Conviction recorded on license for 11 years

Would be ashamed

People would find out

Up to 6 months imprisonment

Lifestyle would change dramatically

Would have to sell car

Recognisers

Non-recognisers

(*)(*)

*

6

Q10: If someone were to be caught driving after taking recreational drugs, how likely do you think it would be that each of the following would happen?Base: All males 17-29 post-stage, pilot region (recognisers: 254, non-recognisers: 245) *denotes significant difference between ad recognisers and non recognisers

This group also find the threat of a fine a bit more credible, and show directionally stronger expectations of most other outcomes

% likely (net)

*

Page 43: THINK! Drug Drive campaign evaluation · 2015. 8. 17. · 1. 2. 3. About half of respondents recognised some element of the campaign, which represents reasonably strong reach. 4.

THINK! Drug Drive evaluation© TNS April 2015

Focus on those who know someone who drug drives

*

*

6

8

Page 44: THINK! Drug Drive campaign evaluation · 2015. 8. 17. · 1. 2. 3. About half of respondents recognised some element of the campaign, which represents reasonably strong reach. 4.

THINK! Drug Drive evaluation© TNS April 2015

90

78

8985

Rest of sample Know someone

Pre Post

Among those who know someone who drives after using drugs, there has been a slight increase in the proportion who consider drug driving unacceptable

% who think it is unacceptable to drive after taking class A drugs

Q1c: You are now going to see some various types of behaviour and for each one please state how acceptable or unacceptable you think it is for people to do these things, using the scores on the screen. A score of one means you think the behaviour is fairly acceptable and a score of five means you think it is extremely unacceptable, or you can use one of the numbers in between.Base: All males 17-29 Pre/Post (Rest of sample: 771/785; Those who know someone who drug drives (129/109) *denotes statistically significant difference from pre to post stage

47

Page 45: THINK! Drug Drive campaign evaluation · 2015. 8. 17. · 1. 2. 3. About half of respondents recognised some element of the campaign, which represents reasonably strong reach. 4.

THINK! Drug Drive evaluation© TNS April 2015

83

57

82

59

Rest of sample Know someone

Pre Post

Driving after smoking cannabis, however, remains substantially more accepted among those who know someone who drug drives

% who think it is unacceptable to drive after smoking cannabis

Q1c: You are now going to see some various types of behaviour and for each one please state how acceptable or unacceptable you think it is for people to do these things, using the scores on the screen. A score of one means you think the behaviour is fairly acceptable and a score of five means you think it is extremely unacceptable, or you can use one of the numbers in between.Base: All males 17-29 Pre/Post (Rest of sample: 771/785; Those who know someone who drug drives (129/109) *denotes statistically significant difference from pre to post stage

48

Page 46: THINK! Drug Drive campaign evaluation · 2015. 8. 17. · 1. 2. 3. About half of respondents recognised some element of the campaign, which represents reasonably strong reach. 4.

THINK! Drug Drive evaluation© TNS April 2015

16

51

16

38

Rest of sample Know someone

Pre Post

People who know a drug driver were significantly less likely to consider drug driving normal in the post-campaign period

% who think drug driving is normal

*

Q2b: How normal do you think it is for people your age to do the following? Base: All males 17-29 pre/post – (Rest of sample: 771/785; Those who know someone who drug drives (129/109) *denotes statistically significant difference from pre to post stage

*

49

Page 47: THINK! Drug Drive campaign evaluation · 2015. 8. 17. · 1. 2. 3. About half of respondents recognised some element of the campaign, which represents reasonably strong reach. 4.

THINK! Drug Drive evaluation© TNS April 2015

2329

4540

Heard something recently Recognise online video ad

Rest of sample Know someone

People who know drug drivers were more likely to have seen/heard something recently about changes to drug drive legislation and recognise the online video ad

%

*

Q12: Have you seen or heard anything recently about changes to drug driving legislation? Q15a: Have you seen this film before? Base: All males 17-29 post stage - Rest of sample/Those who know someone who drug drives (785/109) *denotes statistically significant difference between rest of sample and those who know someone who drug drives

**

50

Page 48: THINK! Drug Drive campaign evaluation · 2015. 8. 17. · 1. 2. 3. About half of respondents recognised some element of the campaign, which represents reasonably strong reach. 4.

THINK! Drug Drive evaluation© TNS April 2015

They were also more likely to view the ads as relevant, and more than half said they were less likely to drug drive after seeing/hearing ads

%

*

Q18: Here are some things that other people have said about the film and the adverts you have just seen and heard. Which of these do YOU personally feel about these adverts? Base: All males 17-29 post stage - Rest of sample/Those who know someone who drug drives (785/109) *denotes statistically significant difference between rest of sample and those who know someone who drug drives

*

**

*

12

47

29

55

These ads are aimed at people like me andmy friends

Less likely to drug drive after seeing/hearingads

Rest of sample Know someone

*

51

Page 49: THINK! Drug Drive campaign evaluation · 2015. 8. 17. · 1. 2. 3. About half of respondents recognised some element of the campaign, which represents reasonably strong reach. 4.

THINK! Drug Drive evaluation© TNS April 2015

44 4141 40

Rest of sample Know someone

Pre Post

4942

5247

Rest of sample Know someone

Pre Post

Perceptions of the consequences of drug driving did not increase significantly over the campaign period among those who know someone who drug drives

% who think it is very/somewhat likely that someone who drives after taking recreational drugs would be stopped by the police

*

Q5a: How likely do you think it is that someone who drives after taking recreational drugs would get stopped by the police?Q5b: How easy do you think it is for the police to spot a driver who has taken recreational drugs? Base: All males 17-29 pre/post – (Rest of sample: 771/785; Those who know someone who drug drives (129/109) *denotes statistically significant difference from pre to post stage

*

% who think that it is very/somewhat easy for the police to spot a driver who has taken recreational drugs

52

Page 50: THINK! Drug Drive campaign evaluation · 2015. 8. 17. · 1. 2. 3. About half of respondents recognised some element of the campaign, which represents reasonably strong reach. 4.

THINK! Drug Drive evaluation© TNS April 2015

77 7880 79

Rest of sample Know someone

Pre Post

Perceptions of the consequences of drug driving did not increase significantly over the campaign period among those who know someone who drug drives

% who think it is very/somewhat easy for the police to tell if someone has taken recreational drugs

*

Q6: If stopped, how easy do you think it is for the police to tell if someone has taken recreational drugs?Q8: If charged by the police, what do you think is the likelihood of getting convicted for driving after taking recreational drugs? Base: All males 17-29 pre/post – (Rest of sample: 771/785; Those who know someone who drug drives (129/109) *denotes statistically significant difference from pre to post stage

*

7582

7783

Rest of sample Know someone

Pre Post

% who think that it is very/somewhat likely to be convicted for driving after taking recreational drugs

53

Page 51: THINK! Drug Drive campaign evaluation · 2015. 8. 17. · 1. 2. 3. About half of respondents recognised some element of the campaign, which represents reasonably strong reach. 4.

THINK! Drug Drive evaluation© TNS April 2015

74

84

81

59

76

75

Post

Pre

(*)

64

74

76

63

71

76

A fine of up to £5000

12 month driving ban

A criminal record

(*)

(*)

People who know drug drivers were much more likely to think that they would be given a fine at the post stage

%

*

Q10: If someone were to be caught driving after taking recreational drugs, how likely do you think it would be that each of the following would happen?Base: All males 17-29 pre/post – (Rest of sample: 771/785; Those who know someone who drug drives (129/109) *denotes statistically significant difference from pre to post stage

Rest of sample Know someone

*

*

*

54

Page 52: THINK! Drug Drive campaign evaluation · 2015. 8. 17. · 1. 2. 3. About half of respondents recognised some element of the campaign, which represents reasonably strong reach. 4.

THINK! Drug Drive evaluation© TNS April 2015

Review of KPIs

*

*

6

9

Page 53: THINK! Drug Drive campaign evaluation · 2015. 8. 17. · 1. 2. 3. About half of respondents recognised some element of the campaign, which represents reasonably strong reach. 4.

THINK! Drug Drive evaluation© TNS April 2015

Review against KPIs

*

*

*

*

*KPI Specific Measures AchievedRaise awareness andunderstanding of new legislation

Awareness that the law around drug driving is changing/has changed

Q12: Have you seen or heard anything recently about changes to drug driving legislation?

Pre: 8%; Post : 26% (significant)

Improve beliefs around enforcement of drug driving

It is easier for the police to detect and catch drug drivers nowadays

Q5a How likely do you think it is that someone who drives after taking recreational drugs would get stopped by the police? [very/somewhat likely]

Pre: 48%; Post: 51%

Q6 If stopped, how easy do you think it is for the police to tell if someone has taken recreational drugs? [very/somewhat easy]

Pre: 77%; Post: 80%

It is easier for drug drivers to be prosecuted nowadays

Q8 If charged by the police, what do you think is the likelihood of getting convicted for driving after taking recreational drugs? [very somewhat likely]

Pre: 76%; Post: 78%

Raise awareness of the personal consequences of a drug driving conviction

Agreement that ‘A drug driving conviction would change my life dramatically

Q10 If someone were to be caught driving after taking recreational drugs, how likely do you think it would be that each of the following would happen? [lifestyle would change]

Pre: 45%; Post: 51% (significant)

Objective:Young men (17-34): to challenge and deter those that take drugs from driving, by:• Increasing the belief that you’re likely to be caught and convicted if you drug drive.• Increasing awareness and salience of the consequences of a drug drive conviction.

64

Page 54: THINK! Drug Drive campaign evaluation · 2015. 8. 17. · 1. 2. 3. About half of respondents recognised some element of the campaign, which represents reasonably strong reach. 4.

THINK! Drug Drive evaluation© TNS April 2015

Insights and recommendations

*

*

6

10

Page 55: THINK! Drug Drive campaign evaluation · 2015. 8. 17. · 1. 2. 3. About half of respondents recognised some element of the campaign, which represents reasonably strong reach. 4.