THERMODYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF PLASMA GASIFICATION SYSTEMS
-
Upload
aytac-sanlisoy -
Category
Documents
-
view
11 -
download
4
description
Transcript of THERMODYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF PLASMA GASIFICATION SYSTEMS
![Page 1: THERMODYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF PLASMA GASIFICATION SYSTEMS](https://reader031.fdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022020801/577c80551a28abe054a83d87/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
INTERNATIONAL FLAME RESEARCH FOUNDATION
1
18th
IFRF Members’ Conference – Flexible and clean fuel conversion to industry
Freising, Germany, 1, 2, 3 June 2015 – Paper n. 11
THERMODYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF PLASMA GASIFICATION SYSTEMS
Aytaç Şanlısoy, [email protected], Melda Özdinç Çarpınlıoğlu,
GAZIANTEP UNIVERSITY
Faculty of Engineering, Department of Mechanical Engineering, 27310, Gaziantep,
TURKEY
ABSTRACT
In this paper, the available literature on the thermodynamic modelling and analysis of plasma
gasification system is criticized. The reactor and plasma generation sections have a critical
importance for production of syngas and reliability of the system. Therefore, the reactor is
taken as control volume and performance of the gasification system with respect to
thermodynamic laws is analyzed. The mass balance for the reactor and the heating values of
the reactants and products are specified. (The chemical reactions for the coal gasification by
air and steam are examined.) Furthermore, the first and second law of the thermodynamics
are applied to obtain the energy balance and required minimum power for plasma gasifier is
determined. The cold gas, hot gas and second law efficiency of the process revealed in terms
of heating value, mass flow rate and standard exergy of the substances.
1. INTRODUCTION The usage of coal, waste and organic matters needs more efficient and environmental
methods to generate desired form of energy. In conventional way, the waste and coal
incinerated to gain heat energy, but the emission released to environment. To decrease the
emission, the fuels gasified by absence or oxygen starved media. By gasification, the fuels
decomposed to its components and mainly CO, H2, CO2 and hydrocarbons are obtained.
There are several methods to gasify the matters such as depending on reactor type; updraft or
downdraft fixed bed, bubbling or circulating fluidized bed, depend on power supply; allo-
thermal and auto-thermal process, depending on reaction media; pyrolysis and gasification
[1]. As it known, the increase of gasifier temperature enhances the conversion of fuel. The
plasma gasification method has unique advantages of very high temperature, high response,
simple and compact design in comparison with other methods [2].
1.1. The Gasification Gasification is conversion of materials into a mixture of gaseous spaces that primary consist
of CO, H2, CO2, and CH4. Conversion of materials to syngas takes place by partial
oxidization of the carbon in gasification material. Gasification occurs at high temperatures by
using controlled amount of supply gases which can be air, steam or oxygen [3]. Syngas
content can change depending on the reactor temperature, gasification material, residence
time of material in reactor, supplied gas type, supplied gas rate, gasification technique,
reactor type and etc.
Gasification is a promising technology that converts simply biomass, municipal solid wastes
and hydrocarbons into syngas which includes mainly Carbon monoxide, hydrogen, carbon
dioxide and methane.
1.2. Thermal Plasma Gasification Plasma gasification; powered by an external energy source, operates at very high
temperatures in an oxygen starved environment to decompose input waste material into
elemental molecules. Products are syngas and inert vitreous (glass-like) materials. Syngas can
be used to generate electricity or liquid fuel production. Plasma technology breaks down
nearly all the materials excluding the radioactive materials to their elemental form. As a result
of high temperature toxic compounds decomposed to harmless chemical elements. In
conventional technologies the remaining ash and char should be handled as final product.
![Page 2: THERMODYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF PLASMA GASIFICATION SYSTEMS](https://reader031.fdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022020801/577c80551a28abe054a83d87/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
INTERNATIONAL FLAME RESEARCH FOUNDATION
2
18th
IFRF Members’ Conference – Flexible and clean fuel conversion to industry
Freising, Germany, 1, 2, 3 June 2015 – Paper n. 11
Plasma gasification system consists of gasification reactor, feeding system, equipment to
handle the slug, ash, tar and char, syngas treatment system, and a monitoring and control
system.
The process in the reactor has a critical importance for the performance of gasification. In
literature it is possible to find thermodynamic analysis of the integrated gasification system.
Wang et al. [4], studied the energy and exergy analyses of an integrated system and they
found that the highest exergy destruction occurs in gasification system. Similarly, Bang-
Moller et al. [5], performed Exergy analysis and optimization of a biomass gasification, solid
oxide fuel cell and micro gas turbine hybrid system and the gasification component of the
integrated system has the largest exergy destruction. Ozturk and Dincer [6], performed the
thermodynamic analysis of multigenerational system by using solar power tower and coal
gasification system. They found that irreversible chemical reactions in the gasification
process is the main reason of the large exergy destruction. Another result is that, increasing
the reference temperature causes better performance. Sandeep and Dasappa [7], performed
the thermodynamic analysis of oxy-steam biomass gasification and they compared the
performance of oxi-steam gasification with air gasification. Kalinci et al. [8], performed the
exergoeconomic evaluation of sewage sludge plasma gasification systems. It is obvious from
the literature survey, the high temperature properties and better conversion properties of
plasma gasification system has advantages compared with conventional methods. If the
performance of the plasma gasification method evaluated by thermodynamic analysis and
obtain high performance syngas production, it will be possible to replace conventional
gasification systems of integrated systems. The aim of this study perform the thermodynamic
analysis of plasma gasification process.
2. DESIGN OF THE PROBLEM The system considered here is the plasma gasification system which used to dispose the waste
materials, low grade coals, plastics and etc. This study includes the parametric analyses of the
efficiency of the system. For this purpose, the first law of thermodynamic will apply to the
main sections of the system, heating value of the fuels (waste materials, low grade coals,
plastics and etc.) will be determined and the efficiency of the system will be obtained.
The model system consists of plasma system, fuel and plasma gases supply system, reactor,
filtration and combustion sections as shown in figure1. Also system includes gas analyze and
temperature measurements sensors in reactor. For the analysis of the system, gasification
reactor was taken as control volume. In gasification reactor while the inputs are steam, air,
and fuel, as a result of chemical reaction, the outputs were syngas, slugs and ash. The
produced syngas sent to the combustion chamber to obtain heat in desired form.
Figure 1: Block diagram of the microwave gasification system
![Page 3: THERMODYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF PLASMA GASIFICATION SYSTEMS](https://reader031.fdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022020801/577c80551a28abe054a83d87/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
INTERNATIONAL FLAME RESEARCH FOUNDATION
3
18th
IFRF Members’ Conference – Flexible and clean fuel conversion to industry
Freising, Germany, 1, 2, 3 June 2015 – Paper n. 11
3. THERMODYNAMIC MODELLING
In this section, the mass balance, chemical reactions, first law of thermodynamics, second law
analysis, lower and higher heating values will be described for this model system.
3.1. Mass balance In gasification reactor while the inputs are steam, air, and fuel, outputs were syngas, slugs
and ash. The produced syngas sent to the combustion chamber to obtain heat in desired form.
The mass balance of the reactor can be written as in equation 1.
�̇�𝑠𝑡𝑒𝑎𝑚 + �̇�𝑎𝑖𝑟 + �̇�𝑓𝑢𝑒𝑙 = �̇�𝑠𝑦𝑛𝑔𝑎𝑠 + �̇�𝑎𝑠ℎ (1)
3.2. The chemical reactions in the reactor The typical chemical reactions occurs in reactor explained below when the coal considered as
fuel. When the air supplied to the reactor, the governor reactions were oxidization. However
in the case of steam supplying, the water gas reaction, water decomposition and Boudourad
reaction occurs [9].
Reactions for oxygen supply;
Oxidization
𝐶 + 𝑂2 → 𝐶𝑂2
𝐶 +1
2𝑂2 → 𝐶𝑂
Coal cracking
𝐶𝑋𝐻𝑌 +1
2𝑥𝑂2 → 𝑥𝐶𝑂 +
1
2𝑦𝐻2
Reactions for water supply;
Water-gas reaction
𝐶 + 𝐻2𝑂 → 𝐶𝑂
𝐶 + 2𝐻2𝑂 → 𝐶𝑂2 + 2𝐻2,
Water decomposition
𝐻2𝑂 → 𝐻2 +1
2𝑂2
Boudourad reaction
𝐶 + 𝐶2𝑂 → 2𝐶𝑂
Finally chemical reaction can be written as below;
(𝐶 + 𝐻2𝑂 + 𝐻2 + 𝑂2 + 𝑎𝑠ℎ) + (𝑂2 + 3.76𝑁2) + 𝐻2𝑂 → 𝐶𝑂 + 𝐻2 + 𝐶𝑂2 + 𝑁2 + 𝑎𝑠ℎ
3.3. First law analysis of thermodynamics In this section, the first law analysis can be done by choosing the reactor as control volume
and writing the energy balance for the input and outputs. The Process assumed as steady
process. The microwave plasma gasification system is an Allo-thermal gasification process,
which means that the process occurs with the external power supply. In the case of steam
input, the first law equation can be written as in equation 2 [10].
𝑄 − (𝑊𝑝𝑙𝑎𝑠𝑚𝑎 + 𝑊𝑠𝑡𝑒𝑎𝑚) = �̇�𝑓𝑢𝑒𝑙 × (𝐻𝐻𝑉𝑓𝑢𝑒𝑙) − �̇�𝑠𝑦𝑛𝑔𝑎𝑠 × (𝐻𝐻𝑉𝑠𝑦𝑛𝑔𝑎𝑠) − �̇�𝑎𝑠ℎ × (𝐻𝐻𝑉𝑎𝑠ℎ) (2)
![Page 4: THERMODYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF PLASMA GASIFICATION SYSTEMS](https://reader031.fdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022020801/577c80551a28abe054a83d87/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
INTERNATIONAL FLAME RESEARCH FOUNDATION
4
18th
IFRF Members’ Conference – Flexible and clean fuel conversion to industry
Freising, Germany, 1, 2, 3 June 2015 – Paper n. 11
In equation; 𝐻𝐻𝑉, 𝑊𝑝𝑙𝑎𝑠𝑚𝑎, 𝑊𝑠𝑡𝑒𝑎𝑚 and �̇� are the higher heating value, the supplied power
to reactor by plasma system, the required power to obtain steam flow rate and the mass flow
rate respectively. The supplied power from microwave system can be obtained in equation 3,
by measuring the difference between the input power and the reflected power.
𝑊𝑃𝑙𝑎𝑠𝑚𝑎 = 𝑃𝑝𝑙𝑎𝑠𝑚𝑎 − 𝑃𝑟𝑒𝑓𝑙𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑒𝑑 𝑝𝑜𝑤𝑒𝑟. (3)
Cold gas efficiency:
The cold gas efficiency (ηCE) is the efficiency of the gasification process which denotes the
ratio of the output energy of syngas to input energy. The cold gas efficiency can be written as
equation 4.
𝜂𝐶𝐺 =�̇�𝑠𝑦𝑛𝑔𝑎𝑠×(𝐻𝐻𝑉𝑠𝑦𝑛𝑔𝑎𝑠)
�̇�𝑓𝑢𝑒𝑙×𝐻𝐻𝑉𝑓𝑢𝑒𝑙+𝑃𝑝𝑙𝑎𝑠𝑚𝑎×𝜂𝑡ℎ(𝑝𝑙𝑎𝑠𝑚𝑎 𝑡𝑜𝑟𝑐ℎ) (4)
Also, the thermal efficiency of the microwave generator can be written as in equation 5.
𝜂𝑇 =𝑃𝑝−𝑃𝑟𝑒𝑓𝑙𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑒𝑑 𝑝𝑜𝑤𝑒𝑟
𝑃𝑝𝑙𝑎𝑠𝑚𝑎 (5)
It is also possible to define the efficiency in terms of gas exit state that is hot gas efficiency. It
is written in equation 6.
𝜂𝐻𝐺 =�̇�𝑠𝑦𝑛𝑔𝑎𝑠×(𝐿𝐻𝑉𝑠𝑦𝑛𝑔𝑎𝑠+𝑐𝑝(𝑠𝑦𝑛𝑔𝑎𝑠)(𝑇𝑠𝑦𝑛𝑔𝑎𝑠−𝑇𝑜))
�̇�𝑓𝑢𝑒𝑙×𝐻𝐻𝑉𝑓𝑢𝑒𝑙+𝑃𝑝𝑙𝑎𝑠𝑚𝑎×𝜂𝑡ℎ(𝑝𝑙𝑎𝑠𝑚𝑎 𝑡𝑜𝑟𝑐ℎ) (6)
The high heating values of coal can be find by the equation 7 [11].
𝐻𝐻𝑉 = 0.3491𝐶 + 1.1783𝐻 + 0.1005𝑆 − 0.1034𝑂 − 0.0151𝑁 − 0.0211𝑎𝑠ℎ (𝑀𝑗
𝑘𝑔) (7)
In here, the C,H, S, O, N and ash are the weight fractions of carbon, hydrogen, sulfur,
oxygen, and nitrogen, , in the coal respectively. This values were obtained from the ultimate
analysis of the coal.
The heating value is called the higher heating value (HHV) when the H2O in the products is
in the liquid form, and it is called the lower heating value (LHV) when the H2O in the
products is in the vapor form [12]. The substance enter and leave the system as higher
temperature than evaporation temperature, so the heating value should be accounted by
considering lower heating value. The lower heating value of the substance can be found by
using the equation 8 [13].
𝐿𝐻𝑉 = 𝐻𝐻𝑉(1 − 𝐻2𝑂) − 2440(𝐻2𝑂 + 9𝐻) (8)
Here, the 𝐻2𝑂 is the weight fraction of moisture in fuel.
HHV is used for cold gas efficiency. Because the fuel and cold gas heating values considered
at ambient temperature. However, the LHV should be used for hot syngas that its temperature
is above the evaporation temperature of the water.
3.4. Second law analysis of the thermodynamics The exergy of the stream may have chemical or physical exergy [8]. For this reason, the
exergy of stream can be defined as in equation 9.
�̇�𝑥𝑡𝑜𝑡 = �̇�𝑥𝑝ℎ + �̇�𝑥𝑐ℎ (9)
![Page 5: THERMODYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF PLASMA GASIFICATION SYSTEMS](https://reader031.fdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022020801/577c80551a28abe054a83d87/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
INTERNATIONAL FLAME RESEARCH FOUNDATION
5
18th
IFRF Members’ Conference – Flexible and clean fuel conversion to industry
Freising, Germany, 1, 2, 3 June 2015 – Paper n. 11
Physical exergy occurs as a result of pressure and temperature difference between the
operation and reference conditions. The physical exergy of the elements of the fuel can
calculated as equation 10,
�̇�𝑥𝑝ℎ = �̇�[(ℎ − ℎ0) − 𝑇0(𝑠 − 𝑠0)] (10)
In equation, �̇� denotes the mass flow rate, ℎ enthalpy of the material at operation condition,
ℎ0 enthalpy of the material at reference state, 𝑠 entropy at working condition and 𝑠0 entropy
at reference state.
The physical exergy of each components of gases spaces can define as equation 11,
�̇�𝑥𝑝ℎ = ∑ 𝑥𝑖�̇�𝑥𝑝ℎ(𝑖)𝑖 (11)
Çengel and Boles [12] noticed that as a result of chemical reactions, the chemical bonds
which bind the atoms together are broken and new ones are formed. The chemical energy
formed as a result of the fission or fusion of the chemical bonds. Kotas [14], defined the
chemical exergy as “Chemical exergy is equal to the maximum amount of work obtainable
when the substance under consideration is brought from the environmental state to the dead
state by processes involving heat transfer and exchange of substances only with the
environment.” Chemical exergy expresses the exergy of a substance at ambient temperature
and pressure. The chemical exergy of the gas mixture can defined as in equation 10.
�̇�𝑥𝑐ℎ = ∑ 𝑥𝑖𝑒0(𝑖) + 𝑅𝑇0 ∑ 𝑥𝑖𝑙𝑛𝑥𝑖𝑖𝑖 (12)
Here 𝑥𝑖 denotes mole fraction of the compound in gas mixture and 𝑒0 denotes standard
chemical exergy. The standard exergy of the product gases can be found in the study of Kotas
[14]. There is uncertainties about the composition of the fuel. Therefore, empirical relation
[15] that calculate the standard chemical exergy can be used.
𝑒0 = 𝛽. 𝐿𝐻𝑉𝑓𝑢𝑒𝑙 (13)
The 𝛽 can be calculated as below, if 𝑂/𝐶 is less than 2.67.
𝛽 =1.0412+0.2160(𝐻/𝐶)−0.2499(𝑂/𝐶)[1+0.7884(𝐻/𝐶)]+0.045(𝑁/𝐶)
1−0.3035(𝑂/𝐶) (14)
As a result, the fuel exergy and the product gases exergy can be calculated and the exergetic
efficiency can calculated as equation 15.
𝜂𝑒𝑥 =(�̇�𝑥𝑝ℎ+�̇�𝑥𝑐ℎ)
𝑠𝑦𝑛𝑔𝑎𝑠
(�̇�𝑥𝑐ℎ)𝑓𝑢𝑒𝑙+𝑃𝑝𝑙𝑎𝑠𝑚𝑎 (15)
4. CONCLUSION
Thermodynamic analysis of plasma gasification systems includes the first law and second law
treatments. Since, theoretical studies are verified by a variety of experimental studies the
necessity for further research on the manner is apparent. The great range of experimental
studies in terms of their characteristics result in a different approaches in thermodynamic
modelling. In order to reveal plasma gasification there is need for both theoretical research on
efficiency and performance parameters and also experimental research.
![Page 6: THERMODYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF PLASMA GASIFICATION SYSTEMS](https://reader031.fdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022020801/577c80551a28abe054a83d87/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
INTERNATIONAL FLAME RESEARCH FOUNDATION
6
18th
IFRF Members’ Conference – Flexible and clean fuel conversion to industry
Freising, Germany, 1, 2, 3 June 2015 – Paper n. 11
REFERENCES:
[1] Tang L., Huang H., Fuel Processing Technology, 88 549 (2007)
[2] Shie J., Chen L., Lin K., Chang C., Energy, 66 82 (2014)
[3] Gray L., Plasma Gasification as a Viable Waste-to-Energy Treatment of Municipal Solid
Waste, Solid and Hazardous Waste Prevention and Control Engineering, MANE 6960,
2014.
[4] Wang J., Yang K., Xu Z., Fu C., Applied Energy, 142 317 (2015)
[5] Bang-Moller C., Rokni M., Elmegaard B., Energy, 36 4740 (2011)
[6] Ozturk M., Dincer I., Energy Conversion and Management, 76 1061 (2013)
[7] Sandeep K., Dasappa S., International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 39 19474 (2014)
[8] Kalinci Y., Hepbasli A., Dincer I., International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 36 11408
(2011)
[9] Lee H. G., Park H., Choi S., Park H., Park D., Journal of Chemical Engineering of
Japon, 47 334 (2014)
[10] Zhang Q., Wu Y., Dor L., Yang W., Blasiak W., Applied Energy, 112 405 (2013)
[11] Channiwala S. A., Parikh P. P., Fuel, 81 1051 (2002)
[12] Çengel Y. A., Boles M. A., Thermodynamics: An Engineering Approach, McGraw-Hill,
p751-792, 2006
[13] Finet C. Waste Management and Research, 5 141 (1987)
[14] Kotas T. J., The Exergy Method of Thermal Plant Analysis, Anchor Brendon Ltd, Great
Britain, 1985.
[15] Szargut J. and Styrylska T., , Brennstoff Warme Kraft, 16 589 (1964)