Thermal noise limit to the Virgo sensitivity
Transcript of Thermal noise limit to the Virgo sensitivity
Thermal noise limit to the Virgosensitivity
Virgo Perugia Group:
L.Gammaitoni, F.Marchesoni, M.Punturo, P.Amico,C.Cattuto, H.Vocca, L.Carbone, R.Mischianti, F.Travasso
1 1 0 100 1000 100001 0
-24
1 0-23
1 0-22
1 0-21
1 0-20
1 0-19
1 0-18
1 0-17
h~∆L/L
T o t
Seism
Thermal
Shot
RadPres
Creep
ThPend
ThMirror
h(f)
[1/
sqrt
(Hz)
]
Frequency [Hz]
The Virgo Sensitivity Curve• The current
suspension forthe Virgo laststage is madeby a doubleloop of C85steel wires
• C85 shows thebest thermalnoise value formetal wiresuspension
• The pendulumthermal noise isdominantbetween 3 and50 hz
Sb
matgB CTLm
E
mN
gE
L
gTkX
φθ
πωω
+≈ 2
252
41
4)(
• Material internalloss angle
3 Contributions to the thermal noise
Pendulum Thermal Noise
• Clamping losses– Can be reduced
by using specialclamps withhigh clampingpressure
– “Spacers” onthe wire-mirrorcontact point
• Ideal solution:– Monolithic
wires
20)(1
0
0
ff
ff
w +∆+=φφ
• Geometricaldilution factor
En
gM
r
LQ
wpend πφ 2
21=
Breaking strength
Clamps & SpacersTop View
Bottom View
Tool Steel insert
• High pressureClamps andSpacers areused to reducethe friction(stick and slipprocess)between wireand clampingdevices ormirror
• Monolithicsolution willeradicate theproblem!
• Silicatebonding will beused to connectthe wires to themirror
1 10 100 100010
-7
10-6
10-5
10-4
10-3
Fused Silica
Fused S i l i ca
S Q 2
Supras i l
C u B e
T i t a n i u m
Tungs ten
M a r v a l
C 8 5 s t e e l
N i o b i u m
I n v a r
Sapph i re
S iC
A l u c h r o m
C h r o m a l l o y
φw(f)
frequency (Hz)
Measured Losses of Materials• All metals (and sapphire) have a similar loss
φ≈10-4
φ≈10-6
Afactor
10on“h”
sensi-tivity
Ref. Phys. Lett. A 255 (1999) 230-235
Fused Silica Vs C85 Breaking Strength: Production facility• Fused Silica breaking strengh is strongly dependent on the production
and handling procedures
– Impurities inserted in the production procedure can decrease thebreaking strength down to few hundreds of MPa.
• For this reason we abandoned the induction oven wire production facility
• A new facility to produce fused silica wires has been realized using a H2-O2 flame (*)
(*)With the collaboration of the G
lasgow G
eo600 Group
Fused Silica Vs C85 Breaking Strength: Handling
• Fused silica fibers are very sensitive to surface scratchs caused bycontact with metal or other hard materials.
• In this case the Griffith’s law relate the scratch size to the breakingstrength
• In literature humidity plays a role in the aging of the fiber, but for themoment we haven’t conclusive data.– A 200 µm diameter fused silica fiber has been loaded for more than one year with
5.5 kg in a very humid environment.
– Failure has occurred after the last strong earthquake in Perugia.
Fused Silica Vs C85 Breaking Strength: Results• The C85 steel shows an high breaking strength (Tb~2.74GPa) and a good “confidence factor” (Cs~0.65). For
this reason C85 has been selected as reference solution for the Virgo mirror suspension wires
• Synthetic Fused Silica shows a similar breaking strength if well produced and carefully handled, but the“confidence factor Cs” is still lower because of a large dispersion of the measured breaking strength valuesand handling problems.
140 160 180 200 220 240 260 280
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
Bre
akin
g St
reng
th (
Kg/
mm2 )
Ethilic Alcool
Bre
akin
g St
reng
th (
MPa
)
Wire diameter (µm )
200
250
300
350
400
450
500
550
600
650
Acid Solution
2000250030003500
40004500500055006000
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Alchool
AcidSolution
Breaking Strength (MPa)
C85 Steel (Mpa) F.S. Alchoolcleaning (Mpa)
F.S. Acid solutioncleaning (Mpa)
2743±64 3577±827 4031±711
Fused silica fibers plasticity
• Fused silica fibers are brittle and don’t show any plasticity behaviour
0 ,00 1,55x10 -3 3,09x10 -3 4,64x10 -3 6,18x10 -3 7,73x10 -3 9,27x10 -3 1,08x10 -2 1,24x10 -2 1,39x10 -2 1,55x10 -2
0 ,00
3,27x10 8
6,54x10 8
9,81x108
1,31x109
1,64x109
1,96x109
2,29x109
2,62x109
2,94x1090 ,00 1 ,50 3 ,00 4 ,50 6 ,00 7 ,50 9 ,00 10,50 12,00 13,50 15,00
0,0
1,0
2,0
3,0
4,0
5,0
6,0
7,0
8,0
9,0
∆LC
EC=1.9 x 101 1 N/m2
CleanDirty
Mm
∆LD
Lw=700+πRM /2 [mm]
ED=2.0 x 101 1 N/m2
VIRGO mirror T=5.2 Kg
∆L [mm]
Loa
d [K
g]
stre
ss [N
/m2]
strain ∆ε 0,00 2,58x10-3
5,15x10-3
7,73x10-3
1,03x10-2
1,29x10-2
1,55x10-2
1,80x10-2
2,06x10-2
2,32x10-2
2,58x10-2
2,83x10-2
0,00
7,70x108
1,54x109
2,31x109
3,08x109
3,85x109
4,62x109
5,39x109
6,16x109
6,93x109
0,00 2,50 5,00 7,50 10,00 12,50 15,00 17,50 20,00 22,50 25,00 27,50
0,0
2,0
4,0
6,0
8,0
10,0
12,0
14,0
16,0
18,0
6.7 x 10 9 PascalBreaking point
∆Lw
Mm
Lw=700 [mm]
Ew=(2.40 ± 0.04) x 1011
N/m2
VIRGO mirror T=5.2 Kg
∆L [mm]
Loa
d [K
g]
stre
ss [N
/m2 ]
strain ∆ε
C85 Steel Fused Silica
Phase modulation@ 12 MHz Pockels
Cell
λ/2
Laser
100mW @ 1.06 µm
Spring loadedC85 steel wire
PZT
Vacuum Chamber
Creep noise: the problem• C85 steel wires under load show anelastic elongation
– DC elongation of the wire
– Shot noise (filtered by the suspension wire) in the interferometer because of thehorizontal-to vertical coupling (see Marchesoni et al., Phys. Lett. A 237 (1997) 21-27)
– A spring loaded C85 wire has been used as support for a mirror in a Mach Zenderinterferometer
( )( ) 2
22 112)(
0 Qf
qfx
ff +−
=π
λ
• The mechanical transfer function is measuredby shaking the structure
• q λ and qλ½ are measured independently
770 775 780 785 790
10 -14
10 -13
disp
lace
men
t in
m/H
z1/2
frequency in Hz
q step sizeλ rate
( )( )( ) smq
s
mq
/102.01.2
101.08.1
101.02.1
10
15
15
−
−
−
⋅±=
⋅±=
⋅±=
λ
λ
Creep noise: the solution• C85 steel wire creep is strongly reduced by low temperature annealing
(stress relaxation):– suspension wires are kept under tension with a load larger than the Virgo mirror
for a week at 150°C in N2 atmosphere
– the final creep rate is qλ≈2·10-14m/s and the noise contribution is reported in thesensitivity curve.
5 10 15 20 251.20x10
-5
1.25x10-5
1.30x10-5
1.35x10-5
1.40x10-5
time in daysIn
crea
sing
leng
th
Len
gth
in m
• And for fused silicasuspension wires?– no conclusive data are
available.
– preliminary results show thatthe creep phenomenon shouldbe negligible
2µm
kgm
CT
cml
mr
load
wire
wire
5.5
5.34
60
100
=°=
== µ
1 10 100 100010
-23
10-22
10-21
10-20
10-19
10-18
C85 steel wire (total) Fused Silica wire (total) FS pendulum thermal noise Mirror thermal noise
h [1
/sqr
t(Hz)
]
Frequency [Hz]
The expected Virgo sensitivity with fused silica fibers