Theories of Learning Thomas G. Bowers, Ph.D. Penn State Harrisburg 2001.

11
Theories of Learning Thomas G. Bowers, Ph.D. Penn State Harrisburg 2001

Transcript of Theories of Learning Thomas G. Bowers, Ph.D. Penn State Harrisburg 2001.

Page 1: Theories of Learning Thomas G. Bowers, Ph.D. Penn State Harrisburg 2001.

Theories of Learning

Thomas G. Bowers, Ph.D.Penn State Harrisburg2001

Page 2: Theories of Learning Thomas G. Bowers, Ph.D. Penn State Harrisburg 2001.

Learning Theory

• Aim is to understand the principles involved in learning and the acquisition of behavior

• Research domain is extensive• Encourage, for this class, adopting a behavioral

point of view– Does not exclude aspects such as thinking,

imagining or feeling

Page 3: Theories of Learning Thomas G. Bowers, Ph.D. Penn State Harrisburg 2001.

Learning Theory

• Effort will be devoted to understanding behavior, as well as cognition– Memory– Rule-governed behavior– Metaphor – Language– Disorders of cognition

Page 4: Theories of Learning Thomas G. Bowers, Ph.D. Penn State Harrisburg 2001.

Learning

• What is learning?– Kimble – “A relatively permanent change in behavior

resulting from experience”– General inadequacies in this definition

Page 5: Theories of Learning Thomas G. Bowers, Ph.D. Penn State Harrisburg 2001.

Basic Procedures to Understand Behavior

• 1. Simplest: Observe behavior• 2. Present stimuli• 3. Arrange for consequences

– Reinforcement– Punishment

• 4. Stimulus control• 5. Establishing operations

Page 6: Theories of Learning Thomas G. Bowers, Ph.D. Penn State Harrisburg 2001.

Some Early Examples

• Kohler – insight experiments with Sultan the chimp– “Thought experiments”– Chimp managed to solve the problem of the banana – In a single trial, without any intervention

Page 7: Theories of Learning Thomas G. Bowers, Ph.D. Penn State Harrisburg 2001.

Some Early Examples

• Tinbergen – Varied stimulus qualities and measured effects on pecking behavior Tinbergen noted stimulus tends to elicit response, described as releasers – Fixed Action Patterns (FAP)– Could be complex behaviors, tended to be important

to the survival or continuation of the organism

Page 8: Theories of Learning Thomas G. Bowers, Ph.D. Penn State Harrisburg 2001.

Some Early Examples

• Thorndike – cat puzzle box– Influence of consequences– Reinforcing consequences maintain behavior or

responding, while punishing consequences decease or suppress the behavior

Page 9: Theories of Learning Thomas G. Bowers, Ph.D. Penn State Harrisburg 2001.

Some Early Examples

• Pavlov and his classical studies• Pfungst (1911) “Clever Hans”

– Noted discriminative functions of stimulus material

Page 10: Theories of Learning Thomas G. Bowers, Ph.D. Penn State Harrisburg 2001.

Some Early Examples

• Skinner described the discriminative function of some stimulus material

Page 11: Theories of Learning Thomas G. Bowers, Ph.D. Penn State Harrisburg 2001.

Law of Effect

• Random variations in behavior• Those with pleasurable consequences are

stamped in while those with noxious consequences are stamped out

• Hedonic assumptions• Instrumental or operant conditioning