Meanings of IRMeanings of IR The term ‘international’ was first used by The term ‘international’ was first used by Jeromy Jeromy

Bentham Bentham in the later part of eighteenth century, in the later part of eighteenth century, with regards the law of nations. with regards the law of nations.

Consequently, the term international relations Consequently, the term international relations was used to define the official relations between was used to define the official relations between the nation-statesthe nation-states

Two views regarding the meaning of IRTwo views regarding the meaning of IR Narrow view:Narrow view: international relations are “the international relations are “the

official relations conducted by the official relations conducted by the authorized leaders of the stateauthorized leaders of the state

Broader viewBroader view: official and unofficial relations : official and unofficial relations by official and unofficial organizations fall by official and unofficial organizations fall within the domains of international relations within the domains of international relations

Other ViewsOther Views K.JK.J Holsti Holsti “It is not only the nations “It is not only the nations

which international relations may refer which international relations may refer to all forms of interactions between to all forms of interactions between the members of separate societies, the members of separate societies, whether government sponsored or notwhether government sponsored or not

Quincy Wright, “It is not only the nations which international relations seek to regulate -----

Varied types of groups--- nations, states, governments, people, regions, alliances, confederations, international organizations, cultural organizations, religious organizations must be dealt with in the study of international relations, if the treatment is made realistic

“International relations is the discipline, which tries to explain political activities across states boundaries and, to date, it has been chiefly concerned with the political relations between government the official representatives of states

Stanley Hoffmann, the discipline of international relations is concerned with the factors and activities, which affect the external policies and the power of basic units into which the world is divided

Trygue Mathiesen says, “it embraces all kinds of relations traversing state boundaries, no matter whether they are of an economic, legal, political or any other character, whether they be private or official, and all human behavior originating on one side of a state boundary and affecting human behavior on the other side of boundary

According to Theodore A. Couloumbis & James H. Wolfe “It is not only a distant field of study, but it also include international theory, comparative foreign policy analysis, international organizations comparative politics and regional studies strategic studies, international development, international communications, peace studies and conflict resolutions including arms control and disarmament

In summary; the IR, includes; a wide variety of transnational relation, official and unofficial, formal & informal

EVALUATIONARY PHASES OF IR EVALUATIONARY PHASES OF IR

Historical phaseHistorical phase; how the ; how the present had been present had been formed from the past. Legalistic phase, nation states formed from the past. Legalistic phase, nation states increasingly implicated in a complex set of rulesincreasingly implicated in a complex set of rules

Organizational PhaseOrganizational Phase; foundation of IR & ordering the ; foundation of IR & ordering the world through international institutions like; League of world through international institutions like; League of Nations after WW-INations after WW-I

Great Power Interplay PhaseGreat Power Interplay Phase; Military strategy came ; Military strategy came into being –disastrous stage birth of UNO after WW-IIinto being –disastrous stage birth of UNO after WW-II

Cold War PhaseCold War Phase; ; Controversies over the Controversies over the Ideologies in world politics & appearance of bi-Ideologies in world politics & appearance of bi-polarism; idealism & realism of nation- state’s polarism; idealism & realism of nation- state’s power dominated power dominated

Sanitized Realism phaseSanitized Realism phase; autonomy of state ; autonomy of state actors & their max role in the name of National actors & their max role in the name of National interest. Traditionalism prevailed in academic IRinterest. Traditionalism prevailed in academic IR

Scientific Thinking PhaseScientific Thinking Phase; Replaced both ; Replaced both classical & traditional orientation by scientific classical & traditional orientation by scientific method, behaviouralists playedmethod, behaviouralists played

Post-behavioural PhasePost-behavioural Phase; Peace & world order ; Peace & world order got central position. Institutionalization of new got central position. Institutionalization of new field of IR; International Political Economyfield of IR; International Political Economy

International Relations & International Politics

An interchangeable Term; EH carr & Quincy Wright

IR has wider scope than intl Politics; John Hanessian, Spiro etc

IR is Primarily used to describe official Political relations between govts on behalf of states

Intl Politics is not conducted between or among nations

Padefold & Lincoln: IR & intl politics are two different aspects

Scope of IRScope of IR Pre WW-IPre WW-I; Study of Diplomatic History & ; Study of Diplomatic History &

Contemporary International AffairsContemporary International Affairs Post WW-IIPost WW-II; International Law, International ; International Law, International

Institutions & OrganizationsInstitutions & Organizations Pre WW-II Pre WW-II – War as an instrument of state – War as an instrument of state

craft & Global system of collective securitycraft & Global system of collective security

Post WW-II; Post WW-II; Enhancement in the Political & Enhancement in the Political & economic aspects of IReconomic aspects of IR

Current Scope of IR; Diplomatic Theory, International Principles, National Interest, Foreign Policy, International Affairs, International Law, International Institutions, Etc

Five Ingredients of IRFive Ingredients of IR Nature and operations of state systemNature and operations of state system

Factors which effect the power of the stateFactors which effect the power of the state

International positions and foreign & International positions and foreign & foreign policies of the great powersforeign policies of the great powers

The history of recent international The history of recent international relationsrelations

The buildings of a more stable world orderThe buildings of a more stable world order

Seven Ingredients by Vencent Baker

The Nature & Principle forces of International Politics

The Political, Social & Economic organization of social life

The element of National Power

The instrument available for promotion of the National interest

The limitation & control of national Power

The foreign Policy of one or more major powers & occasionally of small state

The historical ingredient as a background for other factors & as a history of recent international events

Why Study IR Studying the International Political

activities

Study of Human’s behavior & its effects on International Politics

Contribution to the formulation of Foreign Policy

Study of IR for awareness of Concepts, hypothesis & Model of disciplines to develop views

Approaches to study IR

Traditional Approach

Scientific ApproachBehavioural Approach

Post- Behavioural ApproachSystem Approach

Traditional Approach (TA) Derived from Philosophy, history & Law Have tentative & inconclusive status As per TA: “IR is Study of patterns of

actions & reactions among sovereign states – covers range of relationships spanning from cooperation to conflict & from Peace to War”

Variables affect the behavior of diplomats & administrators, who implement the state Policy

Factors are; climatic, geographic, population, interest, religion ideology etc.

Leading exponents of TA; Raymond Aron, Stanley Hoff mann, Hans Morgenthau etc

Morgenthau advanced the theory of Political Realism

Basic Concepts of TA; Balance of Power, world order & National interest

IR is a sub Division of Political Science & History with a unique identity

Minor variants of TA; Historical, philosophical, legal & institutional

MAJOR VARIANTS OF TRADITIONAL APPROACH

REALIST THEORY Leading exponents: Geoge Kennon,

Henry Kissinger & Hans J Morgenthau International Politics like other Politics is

a struggle for Power Whatever the ultimate aims of

International politics; power is always immediate aims

Statesmen and people may ultimately, seek freedom, security prosperity or prosperity or power itself, they may define their goals power itself, they may define their goals in terms of religious, philosophy, in terms of religious, philosophy, economic or social idealseconomic or social ideals

They may hope that this ideals will materialize through its own inner force, through divine intervention or through the natural development of human affairs

They may also try to further its realization through non-political means, such as technical cooperation, but whenever they strive to realize their goal by means of international politics, they do so by striving for power”

Morgenthau’s six Morgenthau’s six principles of Realist theoryprinciples of Realist theory

Politics isPolitics is governed by objective governed by objective laws, which are based on human laws, which are based on human nature and psychologynature and psychology

The facts can be ascertained through The facts can be ascertained through reasons, thus political theory is reasons, thus political theory is based on human psychology and based on human psychology and reasonreason

The concept of the national interests The concept of the national interests can be defined in the terms of can be defined in the terms of power. Politics can be understood on power. Politics can be understood on rational basis rather than moral or rational basis rather than moral or religious onesreligious ones

National interests is not fixed & is National interests is not fixed & is molded by the environments, thus the molded by the environments, thus the environment determines the political environment determines the political actionaction

Universal moral principles can not Universal moral principles can not be applied to states actions and be applied to states actions and these must be molded to the these must be molded to the circumstances of time and placecircumstances of time and place

State can not observe the same State can not observe the same standard of standard of morality, as are morality, as are observed by individual. Individual observed by individual. Individual can scarify his liberty for moral can scarify his liberty for moral principle, but sate can notprinciple, but sate can not

There are no identity between moral There are no identity between moral aspiration of a nation and moral law, which aspiration of a nation and moral law, which govern the universe and asserts that all govern the universe and asserts that all political actors pursue their national interestspolitical actors pursue their national interests

Political sphere is an autonomous as the Political sphere is an autonomous as the spheres of economists or the lawyers or the spheres of economists or the lawyers or the moralist. The political actors think in the term moralist. The political actors think in the term of national interests, as the economist think of national interests, as the economist think in term of utility and lawyer in the term of in term of utility and lawyer in the term of conformity of action with moral principlesconformity of action with moral principles

Theory is ambiguous & inconsistent No universally accepted definition Wrongly assumed that all individual

& states seek their national interests in term of Power

Wrong assumption that Power is the most important goal which Nations Pursue

Criticism

Is defective; treats the World as a static unit

Wrong in claiming that national Interest carries its own morality

Defective in a sense that hardly there is any relationship or activity which does not involve Power

Advantage of Realist Theory

Persuasive & supported by historical experience

Compels scholars to re-evaluate their own assumption

Relied by Scholars due to its validity

Leading exponents : Rousseau, Kant, Woodrow Wilson & Condorcet Power Politics as passing Phase of history Future international society based on notion of reformed Intl system

free from, Power Politics ; immorality & violence Aims at bringing about a better world with help of education & Intl

organizations

The Idealist Theory

Rousseau says “ let us not search for what has been done, but rather what should be done & lets dismiss evil & mercenary authority….”

The system asks for high morale Principles in Place of Power – generally not Possible in Practice

Need to defeat totalitarian forces through democratic methods – difficult to attain

Theory is also short of factual position – Nations do not behaves as expected

Criticism

Salient of Traditional Approach

Adoption of middle course – Ecliptics; a synthesis of Realist & Idealist Theories

TA is too Vague as a whole Traditionalists do not analyze

the international issues but remain in Past

Main exponents : Harold Guetzkow, Morton A. Kaplon, Kelmon, Rosenau etc

The approach advanced tentative hypothesis Based on logical & mathematical Proofs or

strict empirical Procedures of verifications Collections of data & relevant material to verify or

discord original hypothesis to includes; collection; classification, arrangement & appraisal leads to; explanation; predictions & prescription

Scientific Approach

Produced more promises than performance & more process analysis then substantive experimentation

Scientific facts can be acquired through: data collection; data classification; arrangements of data & setting up of generalization

Difficulties of scientific approach: Personal involvements; Characteristic of data & Process of Acquiring Knowledge

Originated in 1960s/1970s Leading exponents; Karl W. Deutsch Politics can not be studied scientifically Scientific analysis concerned with facts

not values & IR is not free from Values Focused on methodology rather on facts

or ideas , thus called behavioral approach

BEHAVIORAL APPROACH

Study IR, FP by concentrating on actions & behavior of individuals & statesmen

Main contributors are behavioural sciences like: Sociology, Psychology & Anthropology

Approach can not be relived upon because; behavior of state being an aggregate can’t be determined

Promoter; Rudolph Rummel Originated in 1980s Eclectic trend in study of approaches Two findings for the courses of Wars

by Rummel : democratic states less involve in wars; then authoritarian & libertarian states do not engage in War for economic progress & prosperity

IR is in transition ever since

Post Behavioral Approach

Dependency Theorists Class is much better unit of

analysis than state & IR divides World horizontally or into nation states whereas,

Reality of Political or economical life can be better understood in vertical Terms

World order Theorists: represents the latest stand in idealist though, they believe that the human kind is being threatened by nuclear war, environmental pollution, over –population & recourse-exhaustion

They call for the peaceful transition from the present anarchic international system to new World order based on legitimate representative international institutions

The failure will result in the destruction of world through any of above mentioned devices

Independent Theorsts: represent a synthesis of idealist & realist approaches

They employ the idealist traditions in forecasting the gradual development of an international system of complex interdependence, in which economic, technological & cultural interdependence will render classical warfare over territorial issues

They also turn to the realistic approach & focus on international clusters of specialized activity, such as international trade, international debt, arms control disarmament & war disbandment,

Regime studies employ realist hypothesis in the sense that they relate regime stability to the existence of a single hegemonic power or a nuclear of great power that together establish the basic rules of the game

Practicability: post behavioural approach is more practicable than behavioural

Leading exponents: Jorden, Gunner, Mydal, Stanely Mortan A. Kaplan etc

Originated in 1950s ; aimed to consider IR from the Perspective of Intl system in the Post WW II scenario

An attempt to re-focus attention on the complex interaction between states while retaining the scientific orientation Propounded by behaviourlism

System Approach

Provides only possible method, which can ensure the development of scientific Politics

System is a set of parts which is interrelated & independent. It is a complex whole broken into component Parts, being interconnected

MOST-INCLUSIVE SYSTEM MOST-INCLUSIVE SYSTEM WORLD POLITICAL SYSTEMWORLD POLITICAL SYSTEMLarger SystemLarger System

Nation State GeographicNation State Geographic Multi- International Multi- International TransnationTransnation regionsregions National Organizations National Organizations ReligiousReligious CooperationCooperation Movements Movements

IntermediateIntermediateSystemSystem

VillagesVillages SocialSocial PoliticalPolitical LabourLabour CorporationCorporation EthnicEthnic & cities& cities ClassesClasses PartiesParties UnionsUnions groupsgroups

LowestLowestSystemSystem

House holdingHouse holding Family Family

PROCESS OF SYSTEM APPROACH

Intl system is classified into: Social; Economic & Political system

Social system focus on Primary units like; individuals, families, social & ethnic groups & other entities

Economic system study: National economic system & function of individuals, forms, corporation, labour union, economic classes/ activities & govt Jurisdiction

Political system focus on; national Political system, roles of Political Parties, individuals & Pressure & interest groups

Morton Kaplan’s Six Models Morton Kaplan’s Six Models of International Systemof International System

Balance of PowerBalance of Power The Loose Bipolar ModelThe Loose Bipolar Model The Tight Bipolar ModelThe Tight Bipolar Model The Unit Veto ModelThe Unit Veto Model The Collective Security ModelThe Collective Security Model The Multi-block ModelThe Multi-block Model The Multi-polar ModelThe Multi-polar Model The Mono-polar ModelThe Mono-polar Model

Balance of PowerBalance of Power Precedence: 1815-1914; five major

powers Specific alliance system-limited wars

between major powers-minor powers not allowed to escalate

Intl law remained operative Would it happen again-WMD & UNO Critic: Limited Nuclear powers & its use

as per their wish; Regional organizations & their domination by major powers

The Loose Bipolar ModelThe Loose Bipolar Model Cold war model; existed from 1947-1971 Two super powers in intl system Controller & protectors of weaker states Strict abidance of respective ideologies &

credible Nuc arsenals by US & USSR Change from Nuc to Economic, industrial

& conventional military capabilities Long term alliance, readiness for

destruction, but avoided confrontations

The Tight Bipolar ModelThe Tight Bipolar Model Non Aligned nations absorbed into one or the other

block Uncompressing hostility on ideology & security

remained like LBM Each super power maintained tight control over its

allies Duopoly; assurance of less conflictive system by

each super power by playing down their ideological differences

B. C.

The Unit Veto ModelThe Unit Veto Model

Depicts highly unstable model, mainly because of Nuc weapon by max states

Increases mistrust & doubts, leading to destruction of the world

No conventional wars Crux of model: ask for a single global

authority; controlling all nuclear weapons Any Nuc accident would destroy the world

The Collective Security The Collective Security ModelModel

Ask for a voluntary system for global security without military power

No aggressions, no alliances Violators to be punished by economic &

military sanctions by all states UNO to resolve all outstanding issues Critic: Not practical; like balance of power,

national interests & volunteer submissions

The Multi-block ModelThe Multi-block Model Division of world into 5/7 blocks; each to

be controlled by one of world super power

Maintaining influence through institutionalization of security pacts like; NATO etc.

Economic & political integration at block level like; ASEAN, EU etc

Will affect balance of power & No trans- continental power will exist

The Multi-polar ModelThe Multi-polar Model

Nation states face fragmentation & disintegration by regional, racial, multi-lingual /multi-religious tendencies

Separatists movements are likely to increase

A dangerous model for existence of nation state system

The Mono-polar ModelThe Mono-polar Model Hierarchical model; opposite to the

balance of power system Can be achieved from conquest or

control of globe by a single power US as single power dictates the world

today May be democratic or authoritarian;

would not be very stable