TheGermanreforms compared with the French
28
The German reforms compared with the French [email protected] CNRS/Cee IAT Gelsenkirchen June, 20th, 2005
Transcript of TheGermanreforms compared with the French
The
Ger
man
refo
rms
com
pare
dw
ithth
eFr
ench
Jean
-Cla
ude.
Bar
bier
@m
ail.e
npc.
frC
NR
S/C
eeIA
T G
else
nkirc
hen
June
, 20t
h, 2
005
A c
ompa
rativ
e fra
mew
ork
•Th
e ne
cess
ary
in-d
epth
dia
logu
e fo
r tra
nsla
ting
the
‘un-
trans
lata
ble’
•S
ocie
tal c
oher
ence
s an
d hi
stor
y m
atte
r•
Wha
t sco
pe fo
r the
obj
ect o
f com
paris
on?
•“A
ctiv
atio
n of
soc
ial p
rote
ctio
n” a
s a
tool
, no
t em
ploy
men
t pol
icie
s al
one
Act
ivat
ion
ofso
cial
pro
tect
ion
•A
ctiv
atio
n of
syst
ems,
not
only
ofpe
ople
•A
ctiv
atio
n of
fund
ing
mec
hani
sms:
the
role
ofso
cial
con
tribu
tions
, lab
our c
osts
, ful
l em
ploy
men
t•
Act
ivat
ion
and
right
sof
insu
ranc
e, o
fsoc
ial
citiz
ensh
ip
Ger
man
refo
rms:
see
nfro
ma
prov
ocat
ive/
Fren
ch a
ngle
: ke
ydi
ffere
nces
atfir
stsi
ght
•C
onsi
sten
cyin
impl
emen
tatio
n an
d m
otto
(för
dern
und
ford
ern)
; the
role
of k
ey “p
rinci
ples
”•
Still
so
few
“em
ploy
men
t pro
gram
mes
” pro
per:
why
cu
rse
the
ABM
? [a
s ag
ains
t ‘ei
nE
uro
jobs
’]•
Ope
nnes
s: B
AA
sca
ndal
; out
puts
: mon
itorin
g; n
umbe
r of
peop
le in
PS
As;
incr
ease
of u
nem
ploy
men
t fig
ures
; op
enne
ss in
the
run-
up to
ALG
II; «
able
-to-w
ork/
not
able
»•
Sim
plifi
catio
n (n
ot to
Dan
ish
exte
nt: t
wo-
stop
s/on
e st
op)
•Im
porti
ng a
n el
emen
t of B
ever
idgi
sm: r
evol
utio
n?•
Gov
erna
nce/
Fund
ing:
Stic
king
to th
e ol
d pr
inci
ple
of
parit
y fo
r fun
ding
/aut
onom
y of
soc
ial p
artn
ers
[äqu
ival
enz]
Ger
man
yin
the
Fren
ch m
irror
•France
•R
efor
ms
anno
unce
dan
dno
tim
plem
ente
d•
Polit
ical
com
mun
icat
ion
•R
efor
ms
deci
ded
and
canc
elle
d•
Plus
ça
chan
ge, p
lus
c’es
t la
mêm
e ch
ose
(con
tinui
ty)
•So
me
refo
rms
are
cons
iste
nt
(fund
ing;
pen
sion
s)•
The
adva
ntag
esof
bein
ghy
brid
ised
: Rep
ublic
anBe
verid
gism
ista
ken
for
gran
ted
[RM
I]
•Germany
•Ei
nszu
eins
•D
ownp
layi
ngun
empl
oym
ent
figur
es p
robl
ems
•Es
geh
tnic
htan
ders
•In
nova
tion
desp
ite
•C
onsi
sten
t ref
orm
ing
but n
otso
cons
iste
nt?
[soc
ial
partn
ers/
com
mun
es]
•Th
ele
gacy
ofB
ism
arck
?
Fran
ce :
inst
itutio
ns e
t rés
eaux
sign
ifica
tifs
M
arch
é du
tra
vail
ordi
naire
IN
SER
TIO
N
SOC
IALE
ET
PRO
FESS
ION
NEL
LE
Sécu
rité
soci
ale
Vale
urs/
N
orm
es
Dro
it à
l’ins
ertio
n
Imag
es
Solid
arité
ci
toye
nnet
éFr
actu
re
soci
ale
lutte
con
tre
l’exc
lusi
on
outil
s C
ontra
t d’
inse
rtion
, PA
RE ,
etc
Empl
ois
aidé
s et
d’in
serti
on
Solid
arité
et
aid
e so
cial
e
Act
ivat
ion:
from
prog
ram
mes
to
the
polit
ical
notio
n�
The
Sw
edis
h le
gacy
: th
e 50
s: la
bour
mar
ket p
ol.
�P
rogr
amm
es a
cros
s E
urop
e an
d th
e U
SA
: fro
m
the
late
70s
•in
serti
on(F
ranc
e)•
‘wor
kfar
e’ (U
SA
)•
The
‘New
Dea
l’ in
the
UK
•‘A
ktiv
erin
g’ (D
enm
ark;
late
r: S
wed
en)
�‘A
ctiv
atio
n’ in
toda
y’s
polit
ical
dis
cour
se (E
U,
OE
CD
)
Act
ivat
ion:
the
conc
ept
•En
hanc
ing,
Intro
duci
ngsy
stem
atic
links
betw
een
•so
cial
pro
tect
ion
and
•em
ploy
men
t(la
bour
forc
e pa
rtici
patio
n)•
Wel
fare
-to-w
ork
or w
orkf
are
(in th
ese
nse
of ‘a
ctiv
atin
g’
the
unem
ploy
ed, t
hepo
or) i
son
lyon
e (A
nglo
-Sax
on)
elem
ento
f the
wid
erpi
ctur
e•
Pote
ntia
llyal
l are
as o
f soc
ial p
rote
ctio
n ar
e co
ncer
ned
(pen
sion
s, a
ssis
tanc
e, e
duca
tion,
labo
ur m
arke
tpr
ogra
mm
es, t
rain
ing…
)•
Activ
atin
gth
ein
divi
dual
s�
Act
ivat
ing
the
syst
ems
Two
idea
l-typ
es
Act
ivat
ion
of s
ocia
l pro
tect
ion:
two
Bev
erid
gean
idea
l-typ
es
Ser
vice
s+re
form
edbe
nefit
sW
elfa
reto
wor
k+ ta
xcr
edits
Prog
ram
s
Act
ivat
ion
Con
tract
/full
empl
oym
ent
Ince
ntiv
es+s
anct
ions
unde
rem
ploy
men
tTh
eso
lutio
ns
Bal
ance
indi
vidu
al-
soci
ety
Mar
keta
ndst
ate
Sel
f-rel
ianc
e:V
ersu
s ‘D
epen
denc
y’M
arke
t
Rul
es/V
alue
s
(Min
or):
wor
ket
hic:
(gen
erou
sbe
nefit
sfo
r all)
(Maj
or):
targ
eted
assi
stan
ce
case
load
s(lo
wfla
t ra
te b
enef
its)
The
«pr
oble
m»
Uni
vers
alis
ticLi
bera
l
Idea
l-typ
esan
dre
al c
ount
ries
(1)
•Th
ecl
oses
tto
the
‘liber
al’:
the
UK
•M
assi
ve p
robl
emof
ass
ista
nce
(wor
kles
snes
s/di
sabi
lity
bene
fits)
•Th
e‘m
akin
gw
ork
pay’
pol
icy:
Shi
fting
to
gene
ralis
edta
x-cr
edits
(ince
ntiv
es)
•‘A
ctiv
atin
g’ th
eun
empl
oyed
and
the
assi
sted
: en
hanc
ing
serv
ices
and
sanc
tions
•O
utco
mes
: Ina
ctiv
ity?
still
to b
eas
sess
ed+
incr
easi
ngin
equa
lity
+ ta
rget
ing
pove
rty
Idea
l-typ
esan
dre
al c
ount
ries
(2)
•Th
ecl
oses
tto
the
univ
ersa
listic
: Den
mar
k•
1994
-199
8: u
nive
rsal
activ
atio
n fo
r all
insu
red
and
assi
sted
unem
ploy
ed: h
igh
qual
itytra
inin
g•
Hig
hso
cial
isat
ion
of ri
sks/
Hig
hfle
xibi
lity
of th
ela
bour
mar
ket
•O
utco
mes
: equ
ality
mai
ntai
ned
+qua
si-fu
ll em
ploy
men
t•
But:
the
‘mar
gina
lised
’ peo
ple
FRA
NC
E
•A
s a
‘con
tinen
tal’
coun
try•
A h
ybrid
betw
een
Bev
erid
gism
and
Bis
mar
ckis
m: h
isto
rical
lega
cies
are
mix
ed
and
mig
htex
plai
nth
ecu
rrent
proc
ess
of
refo
rm
Fran
ce a
ndth
eco
ntin
enta
l co
untri
es•
Ther
eis
no th
ird‘a
ctiv
atio
n’ m
odel
yet
=>
hete
roge
neity
: Ita
ly, F
ranc
e, G
erm
any.
.•
The
Fren
ch c
ase :
a m
ixof
bot
hac
tivat
ion
type
so
exte
nsiv
e jo
b cr
eatio
npr
ogra
mm
es a
ndso
lidar
istic
‘inse
rtion
’o
refo
rmin
g th
efu
ndin
gof
soc
ial p
rote
ctio
n (e
mpl
oyer
s’ s
ocia
l con
tribu
tions
=>
taxe
s)o
‘Out
com
es’:
pers
iste
nt u
nem
ploy
men
t/s
egm
enta
tion
of th
ela
bour
mar
ket(
two-
tier)
Fran
ce: a
mor
e de
taile
dpi
ctur
e(1
)•
A th
ree-
tier‘
inco
me
repl
acem
ent’
syst
em
(insu
ranc
e+ tw
oas
sist
ance
ben
efits
, cf.
Ger
man
y)•
A pe
culia
rity:
fam
ilial
ism
•M
inim
um in
com
ebe
nefit
s: th
ree
gene
ratio
ns•
The
inse
rtion
ratio
nale
from
1975
(dis
able
d, th
eyo
ung,
the
hard
-to-p
lace
, the
‘exc
lude
d’ (n
ot
‘mar
gina
lized
’)•
Empl
oym
entp
rogr
amm
es: t
heC
ES
as
a sy
mbo
l•
‘Eva
luat
ion’
(?)
O
verv
iew
of m
inim
um in
com
e re
cipi
ents
(199
0-20
00)
Tab
le 2
– B
enef
its’ R
ecip
ient
s
1990
19
95
1999
20
00
RM
I 51
0,10
0 94
6,00
0 1,
017,
800
965,
200
AA
H
538,
700
615,
600
671,
000
689,
000
API
15
1,00
0 16
3,60
0 15
5,20
0 15
6,00
0 A
SS
330,
200
481,
100
470,
800
429,
700
Tota
l 1,
530,
000
2,20
6,30
0 2,
315,
100
2,24
0,70
0 So
urce
: DR
EES
Tab
le 3
– B
enef
icia
ries
incl
udin
g m
embe
rs o
f hou
seho
lds
19
90
1995
19
99
2000
R
MI
1,07
2,00
0 1,
876,
400
Na
1,89
1,80
0 A
AH
86
1,90
0 98
4,90
0 N
a 1,
075,
000
API
39
8,30
0 43
1,50
0 N
a 42
6,40
0 A
SS
825,
400
1,20
2,40
0 N
a 1,
032,
800
Tota
l 3,
157,
600
4,49
5,20
0 na
4,
426,
000
Sour
ce: D
REE
S
Fran
ce: a
mor
e de
taile
dpi
ctur
e(2
)•
Ref
orm
ing
the
fund
ing
of s
ocia
l pro
tect
ion:
tran
sfer
from
soci
al c
ontri
butio
ns
•Em
ploy
ees
soci
al c
ontri
butio
ns•
A ne
w b
rand
of ‘
empl
oym
entp
olic
ies’
=>
com
bine
dw
ithth
eR
WT:
Red
ucin
gth
eco
stof
labo
ur•
Addi
ngan
inci
dent
al‘ta
xcr
edit’
(the
prim
e po
ur l’
empl
oi)
•Pi
ecem
ealr
efor
ms
of m
inim
um in
com
ebe
nefit
s(‘t
raps
’)•
Ref
orm
ing
the
Publ
ic e
mpl
oym
ents
ervi
ce
•Ev
alua
tion
(?)
Tabl
eau
2 : L
es tr
ansf
erts
ent
re ré
gim
es e
n 20
01
Tran
sfer
ts re
çus
Tran
sfer
ts v
ersé
s
Mon
tan
t Mill
ion
s €
Stru
ctur
e %
Part
dans
re
ssou
rce
s %
Mon
tan
t Mill
ion
s €
Stru
ctur
e %
Sold
e de
s tra
nsfe
rts
Rég
ime
géné
ral
29 6
9439
,413
,8
16 6
5922
,213
035
Fond
s spé
ciau
x 73
41,
03,
4 22
443
29,9
-21
709
FCO
SS (1
) 13
161
17,5
100,
0 13
129
17,5
32R
égim
es
parti
culie
rs
5 44
47,
220
,4
3 10
84,
12
336
Rég
imes
dire
cts
140,
00,
0 3
377
4,5
-3 3
63Sa
larié
s agr
icol
es
4 11
15,
549
,6
361
0,5
3 75
0Ex
ploi
tant
s ag
ricol
es
5 86
0 7,
839
,9
151
0,2
5 70
9
Rég
imes
co
mpl
émen
taire
s 8
068
10,0
17,0
57
50,
87
493
Non
sala
riés n
on
agric
oles
3
766
5,0
24,4
1
156
1,5
2 61
0
Ass
uran
ce
chôm
age
765
1,0
2,5
7 85
910
,5-7
094
Rég
imes
d’
inte
rven
tion
soci
ale
des
pouv
oirs
pub
lics
3 56
24,
77,
7 6
361
8,5
-2 7
99
TOTA
L 75
179
10
0,0
75
179
100,
00
Sour
ce :
DR
EES
; (1
) le
FC
OSS
es
t un
fo
nds
de
pass
age,
th
éoriq
uem
ent é
quili
bré
T
able
au 5
:
Stru
ctur
e du
fin
ance
men
t de
la
dépe
nse
de
prot
ectio
n so
cial
e, 1
959-
2002
R
esso
urce
s net
tes
1959
1974
1979
1981
198
519
8919
9119
9519
9920
02co
tisat
ions
em
ploy
eurs
57
,457
,854
,755
,2 5
2,4
52,0
50,4
47,4
46,4
45,9
Effe
ctiv
es
43,3
46,1
44,6
41
,338
,237
,537
,0Fi
ctiv
es
14,1
11,7
10,1
9,
1 9,
2 8,
9 8,
9 co
tisat
ions
sala
riés
13,2
14,7
17,2
18,4
19,
422
,422
,822
,616
,717
,0co
tisat
ions
non
sala
riés
3,9
4,3
4,7
5,1
4,8
5,2
5,6
4,9
3,7
4,0
Tota
l cot
isat
ions
soci
ales
(1)
74,5
76,9
76,6
78,8
77,
380
,378
,874
,966
,766
,9im
pôts
et t
axes
spéc
iaux
(2)
2,6
3,8
3,3
2,3
3,2
3,1
3,9
7,2
16,6
19,0
Tota
l Rat
io (1
+2)
77,2
80,7
79,9
81,1
80,
583
,482
,782
,183
,385
,9C
ontri
butio
ns b
udgé
taire
s 20
,316
,117
,215
,7 1
6,4
14,2
13,7
14,3
13,8
11,4
Tota
l im
pôts
et t
axes
23
,019
,920
,518
,0 1
9,6
17,3
17,6
21,5
30,4
30,4
autre
s res
sour
ces
2,5
3,3
2,9
3,2
3,1
2,4
3,6
3,5
2,8
2,7
TOTA
L 10
010
010
010
0 10
010
010
010
010
010
0So
urce
s : S
ESI,
DR
EES
III –
the
Fren
ch N
AP
Es
•A
naly
sing
the
EE
S•
-act
iviti
es•
-pol
itica
ldis
cour
se•
-nat
iona
l pro
gram
mes
•Th
eFr
ench
con
text
of e
mpl
oym
enta
ndem
ploy
men
tpol
icie
s
Ta
blea
u 16
: C
hôm
age,
em
ploi
et
polit
ique
s de
l’e
mpl
oi
(197
3-20
02
M
illie
rs
1973
19
96
Var
iatio
n 19
96/1
973
2002
20
02/1
996
1
Empl
oi to
tal (
2+3)
21
122
22 2
87+
1 16
524
563
+ 2
276
2
Don
t: su
bven
tionn
és
21
962
+ 1
960
1 85
7- 1
033
Don
t : A
utre
21
119
20 3
25- 7
9422
706
+ 2
381
4
Chô
mag
e (B
IT)
593
3 07
5+
2 48
22
405
- 670
5 Po
pula
tion
activ
e (1
+4)
21 7
1525
362
+ 3
647
26 9
68+
1 60
66
Pré-
retra
ites/
autre
s ce
ssat
ions
d’a
ctiv
ité
4446
5+
421
481
+ 16
7 St
ages
de
form
atio
n 57
300
+ 24
321
0- 9
08
Popu
latio
n po
tent
ielle
men
t ac
tive
(7+6
+5)
21 8
1626
127
+ 4
311
27 6
59+
1 52
3
9 To
tal d
es b
énéf
icia
ires d
es
polit
ique
s de
l’em
ploi
et
chôm
eurs
(2+4
+6+7
)
696
5 80
2+
5 10
64
953
- 849
Sour
ce: M
inis
tère
du
trava
il (D
AR
ES, 2
003)
Tab
le 1
b –
Act
ivity
and
em
ploy
men
t reg
imes
(199
9) (%
)Pa
ys
Ital
ySp
ain
Fran
ceU
K D
enm
ark
Glo
bal
labo
ur
mar
ket
parti
cipa
tion
rate
1
60.2
62.7
68
.4
76.3
81.
1
Fem
ale
empl
oym
ent
rate
, (fu
ll-tim
e eq
uiva
lent
)2
33.3
32.5
45
.3
45.1
58.
6
You
ng
peop
le
empl
oym
ent
rate
(15-
24)
25.5
33.9
20
.8
60.8
66.
0
Seni
or
peop
le
empl
oym
ent
rate
(55
-64)
27.5
34.9
34
.2
49.4
54.
2
Sour
ces :
OEC
D (E
mpl
oym
ent O
utlo
ok, 2
000)
; Em
ploy
men
t in
Euro
pe, E
U, 2
000.
© C
entr
e d’
étud
es d
e l’e
mpl
oi
– J C
Bar
bier
.
1 Cal
cula
ted
on th
e ba
sis o
f wor
king
age
pop
ulat
ion:
15-
64 y
ears
(Eur
opea
n U
nion
) 2 C
alcu
late
d on
the
basi
s of w
orki
ng a
ge p
opul
atio
n: 1
5-64
yea
rs (E
urop
ean
Uni
on)
Em
ploy
men
tpol
icy
•«
Pol
itiqu
e de
l’em
ploi
»•
Onl
yre
lativ
ely
auto
nom
ous
polic
yar
ea in
th
e80
s•
The
youn
gun
empl
oyed
•A
ccom
pany
ing
«re
stru
ctur
atio
ns»
•La
rge
scal
epr
ogra
mm
es o
f tem
pora
ryjo
bs in
the
non-
prof
it/pu
blic
sec
tor
•Ta
rget
edsu
bsid
ies
and
soci
al
cont
ribut
ions
Em
ploy
men
tpol
icy
and
the
NA
PE
•Th
eN
AP
E e
xcee
dsem
ploy
men
tpol
icy:
ed
ucat
ion,
rela
tion
with
soci
al p
rote
ctio
n,
etc.
.•
(one
of t
heE
ES
‘effe
cts’
): no
suc
hdo
cum
ent e
xist
ed
IV-P
ES
and
netw
orks
Act
ors
•E
mpl
oym
entp
olic
yac
tors
: an
outli
ne•
The
‘PE
S s
yste
m’ r
athe
rtha
nth
eP
ES
: A
NP
E; U
NE
DIC
; ot
hers
•N
ew p
ublic
man
agem
ent?
•O
ut-c
ontra
ctin
g•
Act
ors
plur
alis
m(a
ll le
vels
) /
diffi
cult/
abse
nt c
oord
inat
ion
T
able
2 –
Per
form
ance
con
trac
ts -
Obj
ectiv
es a
nd O
utco
mes
– 1
990-
2003
Pe
rfor
man
ce
cont
ract
s K
ey O
vera
ll O
bjec
tives
In
dica
tors
K
ey T
arge
ts
Key
Ta
rget
s ac
hiev
ed/o
utco
mes
C
olle
ct m
ore
vaca
ncie
s/
incr
ease
suc
cess
rate
s of
pl
acem
ents
Mat
chin
g va
canc
ies
and
cand
idat
es
Vac
anci
es
colle
cted
Incr
ease
su
cces
s ra
te
of
plac
emen
ts
Incr
ease
sh
are
mor
e th
an
job
crea
tion
‘Mar
ket
shar
e’:
22,4
%
‘ope
ratio
nal
time’
de
vote
d to
em
ploy
ers:
35%
Enha
nce
serv
ices
for t
he
unem
ploy
ed
Reo
rgan
ise
serv
ice
area
s Fo
cus
thos
e w
ith
mor
e th
an
6 m
onth
s/on
e ye
ar
regi
stra
tion
Reg
istra
tion
time
decr
ease
1st
cont
ract
(1
990-
93)
Mod
erni
se m
anag
emen
t an
d or
gani
satio
n In
tern
al
deve
lopm
ent p
lan
‘déc
once
ntra
tion’
fo
r fun
ding
70
%
of
units
ar
e m
oder
nise
d
JC-B
arbi
er
CN
RS/
CEE
Tabl
e 2
( fol
low
ing)
Pe
rfor
man
ce
cont
ract
s K
ey O
vera
ll O
bjec
tives
In
dica
tors
K
ey
Targ
ets
Key
Ta
rget
s ac
hiev
ed/o
utco
mes
2nd
co
ntra
ct
(199
4-98
) In
crea
se A
NPE
’s ‘
mar
ket
shar
e’
for
vaca
ncie
s;
AN
PE
sing
le
corr
espo
nden
t fo
r em
ploy
ers
subs
idie
s:
focu
ssin
g on
firm
s
C
olle
ct
1,5-
2 m
illio
n (1
994-
95)
vaca
ncie
s In
crea
se
mar
ket
shar
e to
40
%
achi
eved
40
%
:ach
ieve
d in
19
96
Enha
nce
serv
ice
for
the
unem
ploy
ed,
espe
cial
ly
the
very
LT
U
(ove
r 2
year
s)
Dec
reas
e th
e sh
are
of L
TU b
y on
e po
int
% p
er y
ear
(94-
98)
[12%
-199
3]
100%
of
the
youn
g tre
ated
by
6 m
onth
s
Not
ach
ieve
d: s
hare
su
perio
r to
15%
and
re
achi
ng
17.6
%
in
1998
Dev
elop
par
tner
ship
with
A
FPA
, m
issi
ons
loca
les,
PAIO
, A
gefip
h an
d A
SSED
ICs
Co-
oper
atio
n w
ith A
SSED
ICs
R
egis
tratio
n of
th
e un
empl
oyed
tra
nsfe
rred
ov
er
to
ASS
EDIC
s
Mod
erni
se
man
agem
ent
and
orga
nisa
tion
‘déc
once
ntra
tion’
Acr
oss t
he b
oard
‘d
écon
cent
ratio
n’
New
ta
ilore
d se
rvic
es i
n 25
0 lo
cal
units
(199
8)
JC
-Bar
bier
C
NR
S/C
EE
Tabl
e 2
( fol
low
ing)
Pe
rfor
man
ce
cont
ract
s K
ey O
vera
ll O
bjec
tives
In
dica
tors
K
ey T
arge
ts
Key
Ta
rget
s ac
hiev
ed/o
utco
mes
[s
ee n
ote]
B
ette
r se
rvic
es
for
the
unem
ploy
ed;
AN
PE
a si
ngle
co
rres
pond
ent
(‘in
terl
ocut
eur
uniq
ue’);
‘N
ew S
tart’
pro
gram
me
(cf E
ES –
NA
PE)
Figh
ting
soci
al
excl
usio
n In
crea
se
colle
ctio
n of
va
canc
ies o
n th
e m
arke
t
Prev
entin
g an
d de
crea
sing
LTU
‘New
st
art’
for
LTU
, as
sist
ed
pers
ons
and
youn
g pe
ople
: 2.
5 m
illio
n in
19
98
6.1
mill
ion
indi
vidu
al
plan
s (P
APs
) +
2 m
illio
n en
hanc
ed
serv
ice
plan
s (J
uly
2001
- D
ec 2
002)
3
mill
ion
vaca
ncie
s:
‘mar
ket s
hare
’ sta
ble
Dev
elop
par
tner
ship
and
‘lo
cal
cohe
renc
e’
of
serv
ice
deliv
ery
(‘co
hére
nce
terr
itori
ale
de l
’offr
e de
ser
vice
s ’);
partn
ersh
ip
AN
PE-
AFP
A
‘terr
itoria
lisat
ion’
Qua
ntita
tive
targ
ets
with
A
FPA
Exte
nsio
n of
di
ffer
ent
leve
ls
of
partn
ersh
ips
Mod
erni
se
man
agem
ent
and
orga
nisa
tion
Incr
ease
in
tern
et
and
dist
ance
se
rvic
es
New
dat
a fil
e fo
r th
e un
empl
oyed
20
0 lo
cal
units
wer
e ce
rtifie
d fo
r qu
ality
(2
003)
3rd
cont
ract
(1
999-
2003
)
JC-B
arbi
er
CN
RS/
CEE
. Not
e: th
e fin
al e
valu
atio
n re
port
of th
e 3rd
per
form
ance
con
tract
is o
nly
due
in 2
004
