Improved cosine similarity measures of simplified intuitionistic sets for medicine diagnoses
The WV Development Office Has Not Improved Performance Measures
-
Upload
the-west-virginia-examinerwv-watchdog -
Category
Documents
-
view
216 -
download
0
Transcript of The WV Development Office Has Not Improved Performance Measures
-
8/8/2019 The WV Development Office Has Not Improved Performance Measures
1/25
AGENCY REVIEW
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCEDEVELOPMENT OFFICE
August 2010
PE 10-06-473
AUDIT OVERVIEW
The Development Ofce Has Not ImprovedPerformance Measures
The Development Ofce Has Improved ItsEmployee Evaluation System
WEST VIRGINIA LEGISLATIVE AUDITOR
PERFORMANCE EVALUATION & RESEARCH DIVISION
-
8/8/2019 The WV Development Office Has Not Improved Performance Measures
2/25
JOINT COMMITTEE ON GOVERNMENT OPERATIONS
Senate
Edwin J. Bowman, Chair
Herb Snyder, Vice-Chair
Walt Helmick
Brooks McCabeClark S. Barnes
House o Delegates
Jim Morgan, Chair
Dale Stephens, Vice-Chair
Sam Argento
Ruth RowanPatti Schoen
Craig Blair, Nonvoting
Scott G. Varner, Nonvoting
Agency/ Citizen Members
Dwight Calhoun
John A. Caneld
W. Joseph McCoy
Kenneth QueenJames Willison
JOINT COMMITTEE ON GOVERNMENT ORGANIZATION
Senate
Edwin J. Bowman, Chair
Herb Snyder, Vice-ChairRichard Browning
Dan Foster
Jerey V. Kessler
Brooks McCabe
Joseph M. Minard
Corey L. Palumbo
Randy White
Bob Williams
Jack Yost
Donna J. Boley
John Shott
Dave Sypolt
House o Delegates
Jim Morgan, Chair
Dale Stephens, Vice-ChairSam J. Argento
Brent Boggs
Greg Butcher
Samuel J. Cann, Sr.
Roy Givens
Daniel J. Hall
William G. Hartman
Barbara Hateld
Mike Manypenny
Dale Martin
Daniel Poling
Meshea L. Poore
Margaret A. Staggers
Randy SwartzmillerJoe Talbott
Terry Walker
Tom Azinger
Daryl E. Cowles
Pat McGeehan
Carol Miller
Jonathan Miller
Thomas Porter
Ruth Rowan
Aaron Allred
Legislative Auditor
Building 1, Room W-314
State Capitol Complex
Charleston, West Virginia 25305
(304) 347-4890
John Sylvia
Director Research Manager
Tina L.C. Baker
Research Analyst
WEST VIRGINIA LEGISLATIVE AUDITOR
PERFORMANCE EVALUATION & RESEARCH DIVISION
Reerencer
Brian Armentrout Derek Thomas
-
8/8/2019 The WV Development Office Has Not Improved Performance Measures
3/25
Performance Evaluation & Research Division | pg.
Agency Review August 2010
CONTENTS
Executive Summary .................... ................... .................... .................... ................... .................... .................... ................... .......... 5
Objective, Scope and Methodology .................. .................... .................... ................... .................... .................... ................... 7
Issue 1: The Development Ofce Has Not Improved Perormance Measures ................... .................... ................... 9Issue 2: The Development Ofce Has Improved Its Employee Evaluation System ................. .................... ..........15
List O Tables Table 1: Levels o Compliance .................. ................... .................... .................... ................... .................... .................... ......... 5
List O AppendicesAppendix A: Transmittal Letter to Agency ..........................................................................................................................19Appendix B: 2009 Trade Show Cost Analysis ......................................................................................................................21Appendix C: Agency Response ...............................................................................................................................................23
-
8/8/2019 The WV Development Office Has Not Improved Performance Measures
4/25
pg. | West Virginia Legislative Auditor
Development Ofce
-
8/8/2019 The WV Development Office Has Not Improved Performance Measures
5/25
Performance Evaluation & Research Division | pg.
Agency Review August 2010
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
This review is an update of the September 2007 PerformanceEvaluation of the West Virginia Development Ofce (WVDO). Thepurpose of this update is to determine whether WVDO has complied with
recommendations made in that report. Of the six recommendations withwhich compliance was evaluated, the WVDO demonstrated compliancewith one, partial compliance with three, and non-compliance with tworecommendation.
In response a recommendation made in the previous report,the Executive Director issued a directive requiring annual employeeevaluations. The WVDO has also incorporated outcome measures inaddition to input measures into its evaluation system and demonstratesplanned compliance with the recommendation that evaluation forms befully completed. Although the WVDO uses multi-state comparisons todetermine West Virginias advantages over other states in responding to
preliminary contacts, no efforts are made to track the results of these preliminary contacts in order to determine which methods are moreeffective at attracting businesses. The WVDO has not complied withthe recommendation to develop outcome measures for determining theorganizations performance.
This update uses the following designations for compliance withprevious recommendations made by the Legislative Auditor:
Table 1
Levels of Compliance
In Compliance The Division has corrected the problem(s) identied in theprevious report.
Partial ComplianceThe Division has partially corrected the problem(s) identied
in the previous report.
Planned Compliance
The Division has not corrected the problem(s) identied
in the previous report, but has provided sufcient
documentation that the agency will do so in the future.
In DisputeThe Division does not agree with either the problem
identied or the proposed solution.
Non-Compliance The Division has not corrected the problem(s) identied inthe previous report.
Requires Legislative Action
The recommendation was intended to call the attention of
the Legislature to one or more issues that may or may not
require statutory changes.
Legislation EnactedThe Legislature took legislative action to issues raised by the
Legislative Auditor in the 2007 report.
O the six recommendations withwhich compliance was evaluatedthe WVDO demonstrated compliance with one, partial compliance with three, and non-compliance with two recommendation
-
8/8/2019 The WV Development Office Has Not Improved Performance Measures
6/25
pg. | West Virginia Legislative Auditor
Development Ofce
-
8/8/2019 The WV Development Office Has Not Improved Performance Measures
7/25
Performance Evaluation & Research Division | pg.
Agency Review August 2010
OBJECTIVE, SCOPE & METHODOLOGY
Objective
This agency review of the West Virginia Development Ofce
(WVDO) was conducted as part of the Departmental Review of theWest Virginia Department of Commerce mandated by West VirginiaCode 4-10-8(b)(3). The objective of this review was to determine theWVDOs compliance with recommendations made in a 2007 report bythe Legislative Auditor
Scope
The scope of this report was actions taken by the WVDO sincethe release of the Legislative Auditors report in September 2007.
Methodology
In order to determine the WVDOs compliance with previousrecommendations, the Legislative Auditor corresponded with WVDOstaff and reviewed information found in the West Virginia Code of StateRules, WVDO reports and other publications, and employee evaluationforms.
-
8/8/2019 The WV Development Office Has Not Improved Performance Measures
8/25
pg. | West Virginia Legislative Auditor
Development Ofce
-
8/8/2019 The WV Development Office Has Not Improved Performance Measures
9/25
Performance Evaluation & Research Division | pg.
Agency Review August 2010
ISSUE 1
Since outcome measures arelinked to the agencys missionthese are more indicative o thesuccess and eectiveness othe agencys programs. Consequently, the Legislative Auditoindicated in the 2007 report thaWVDO should develop outcomemeasures or all its programs.
The Development Ofce Has Not Improved PerformanceMeasures.
Recommendation 1
TheDevelopmentOfceshoulddevelopperformancemeasuresthatmeasuretheoutcomesofitsprograms.
Level of Compliance: Non-Compliance
An organizations performance is measured by several interrelatedelements:
Inputs - the amount of a particular resource, such as money orstaff time, used to produce results;
Activities - the actions taken by a program to produce results;
Outputs - the amounts of products or services produced, such asclients served or business contacts made;
Outcomes - changes, such as an increased number of foreigninvestors, indicating progress toward the organizations missionor objectives; and
Efciency measures - a cost per unit measure indicating how
efciently the organization is producing results.
In the September 2007 evaluation of the West Virginia DevelopmentOfce (WVDO), the Legislative Auditor found that the WVDO was notutilizing outcome measures to determine the effectiveness of its programs.Instead, it was relying on input, output, and activity measures in all buttwo of its divisions. Since outcome measures are linked to the agencysmission, these are more indicative of the success and effectiveness of theagencys programs. Consequently, the Legislative Auditor indicated inthe 2007 report that WVDO should develop outcome measures for allits programs. When asked whether outcome measures had since beendeveloped, the WVDO pointed to the following:
Evaluation of trade shows by the WVDO beginning in 2008;
WVDO support of initiatives such as the reform of WorkersCompensation, phased reduction of the corporate net incometax rate, and phased reduction and eventual elimination of thebusiness franchise tax; and
-
8/8/2019 The WV Development Office Has Not Improved Performance Measures
10/25
pg. 10 | West Virginia Legislative Auditor
Development Ofce
The evaluation o trade shows ascurrently conducted by WVDO isnot a measure o outcomes, buta measure o inputs (trade showcost) and outputs (number oleads, contacts, or suspects).
The use of multi-state comparisons in preparing and analyzingeconomic development marketing materials.
The 2009 evaluation of trade shows is provided in Appendix B.As the appendix shows, in 2009 the WVDO measured the cost of eachtrade show; the number of leads, suspects, and contacts made at eachshow; and the cost per lead, suspect, and contact. For the 2010 analysis,the term suspect has been eliminated due to a strong similarity betweensuspects and leads. Both suspects and leads refer to companies thatillustrate the potential for investment projects, but more information isknown about leads. As used in this analysis, the WVDO denes contactsand leads as follows:
Contactaqualitycompanyinoneofourtargetsectorsthatmeritscontinuedfollow-
up but shows no immediate investmentopportunity.
Leadacompanythathasexpressedplansfor an investment project in the shortorlongterm.
Both contacts and leads are generatedfrom a business or industry; not tradeorganizations.
The WVDO indicated that trade show evaluation illustratesthecost
perleadversustheactualqualityoftheleadobtained;therebyallowingustomaximizeoutcomesinacosteffectivemanner. Additionally, theWVDO stated that the calculations were preliminary and that variableswould not be seen until year ve of evaluation. When questioned by theLegislative Auditor as to what variables would be included in the long-term analysis, the WVDO indicated the continued use of the formulashown in Appendix B; e.g., the number of contacts/leads generated andassociated costs of a trade show. The evaluation of trade shows ascurrently conducted by WVDO is not a measure of outcomes, but ameasure of inputs (trade show cost) and outputs (number of leads,contacts, or suspects). In order to determine the effectiveness of tradeshows, the WVDO should expand the scope of the evaluation process
to track the outcome of leads and contacts made how many leads orcontacts actually result in the establishment of investment projects.
The support of initiatives by the WVDO such as the reform ofWorkers Compensation, phased reduction of the corporate net incometax rate, and phased reduction and eventual elimination of the businessfranchise tax is also not an outcome measure, but an activity measure.The Legislative Auditor inquired whether there are plans to track the
The support o initiatives by theWVDO such as the reorm oWorkers Compensation, phasedreduction o the corporate net
income tax rate, and phased re-duction and eventual eliminationo the business ranchise tax isalso not an outcome measure,but an activity measure.
-
8/8/2019 The WV Development Office Has Not Improved Performance Measures
11/25
Performance Evaluation & Research Division | pg. 1
Agency Review August 2010
The use o multi-state compasons in preparing and analyzingeconomic development marketing materials is also an activitymeasure, rather than an outcomemeasure.
resulting outcomes of these initiatives in order to determine the impact onbusiness development in West Virginia, to which the WVDO responded:
tracking outcomes of any specicbusinessinitiativewouldbeunreliableandpotentiallymisleading(nottomentionaninefcientuseofscarceresources)duetothefactthatbusinessdevelopmentinWestVirginiadependsuponavarietyoffactors.However it is clear that aggressive taxmodernization efforts, quality trainingprograms,innovativereformssuchastheprivatization of workers compensation,andtheimplementationofboldinitiativessuch as the High Technology Business
Property Valuation Act and AircraftValuation Tax Credit help to create apositive business climate andare knownvariablesinpromotingbusinessgrowth.
The use of multi-state comparisons in preparing and analyzingeconomic development marketing materials is also an activity measure,rather than an outcome measure. Regarding this comparative data, theWVDO states the following:
The WVDO continuously updatescomparative data it uses daily when
preparing proposals for prospectivebusinessesandtorespondtorequestfromcompanies, local economic developmentauthorities, and site location consultantsfor information. Inorder toattract andexpand businesses, it is essential tounderstand the factors that businessesconsider when theymake locational andexpansiondecisions.TheWVDOanalyzesthesefactorsandpromotesthosewherewehaveadvantages.
The WVDO did indicate that it is currently in the process ofdeveloping a Customer Relationship Management system, stating thefollowing:
TheWVDOisworkingwiththeOfceofTechnologytodenetheneedsacrosstheagency in order to develop a CustomerRelationshipManagement (CRM) system
The WVDO is currently in tprocess o developing a Customer Relationship Managemen
system.
-
8/8/2019 The WV Development Office Has Not Improved Performance Measures
12/25
pg. 12 | West Virginia Legislative Auditor
Development Ofce
The development o the CRM
system will provide the WVDOwith an opportunity to establishoutcome measures in compli-ance with the prior recommen-dation made by the LegislativeAuditor.
which will provide management withthe appropriate tools to manage andmore efciently determine statewide
investments and their impacts on thestateThe proposed CRM system willprovidetheWVDOwithacomprehensivedatabasewhichwillassimilatedatafromthe various divisions within the ofce;therebyallowingmanagementtoaccessabroadrangeofinformationtobeusedfortracking,reporting,analysis,etc.Atthistime,weareintheearlystagesofanalysisandtimelinesarebeingestablished
The development of the CRM system will provide the WVDO
with an opportunity to establish outcome measures in compliance withthe prior recommendation made by the Legislative Auditor. Developmentof outcome measures will enable the WVDO to effectively gauge theimpact of its programs in order to better meet the needs of the state andfulll its mission.
Recommendation 2
TheDevelopmentOfceshouldconsiderreviewingandanalyzingrecordsofpreliminarybusinesscontactstoassistinidentifyingpractices
thataremoreeffectiveinattractingbusinessinvestmenttothestate.
Level of Compliance: Partial Compliance
In the September 2007 evaluation of the WVDO, the LegislativeAuditor found that the WVDO was not reviewing records of preliminarycontacts with businesses and recommended that the WVDO begin doingso, stating the following:
Organizing and analyzing records ofpreliminarycontactactivitywithbusinessesshowing interest inWestVirginiacanbe
valuable in identifyingpractices that aremore effectiveatattractingbusinesses tothestate.
The WVDO indicates compliance with this recommendationthrough the use of the multi-state comparative data to prepare proposalsfor and respond to information requests from businesses, developmentauthorities, and location consultants. However, when asked whetherrecords of these contacts are maintained in order to track the requests
The WVDO uses multi-statecomparative data to prepareproposals or and respondto inormation requests rombusinesses, developmentauthorities, and locationconsultants. However, recordso these contacts are notmaintained in order to provideinsight into what methodsattract or ail to attract businessinvestment to the state, whichwas the intent o the LegislativeAuditors recommendation.
In the September 2007 evalua-tion o the WVDO, the LegislativeAuditor ound that the WVDOwas not reviewing records opreliminary contacts with busi-nesses and recommended thatthe WVDO begin doing so.
-
8/8/2019 The WV Development Office Has Not Improved Performance Measures
13/25
Performance Evaluation & Research Division | pg. 1
Agency Review August 2010
The WVDO indicated that it hanot consulted with any outsideentity to develop outcome mea
sures.
made and the resulting outcomes, such as whether a business locates inWest Virginia after receiving proposals or information, the WVDO statesthe following:
tracking outcomes of any specicbusiness initiative would be unreliableandpotentiallymisleading(nottomentionaninefcientuseofscarceresources)dueto the fact that business development inWest Virginia dependsupon a variety offactors.
The ability to compare West Virginias advantages anddisadvantages to those of other states in preparing information andproposals for entities is certainly an important tool. However this does
not provide insight into what methods attract or fail to attract businessinvestment to the state, which was the intent of the Legislative Auditorsrecommendation.
Recommendation 3
TheDevelopmentOfce,oranotherqualiedentitysuchastheWest VirginiaUniversity orMarshallUniversity SchoolsofBusiness,should develop outcome measures internally to fairly and accuratelyreporttheresultsofagencysefforts.
Level of Compliance: Non-Compliance
In response to the lack of outcome measures provided by theWVDO during the 2007 evaluation, the Legislative Auditor conducted ameasure of outcomes by calculating per capita Foreign Direct Investmentand export dollars for West Virginia and competitor states in order togauge performance of the International Division of the WVDO. Itwas recognized that these measures might not be the most meaningfulin determining the states economic competiveness. Therefore, it wasrecommended that the WVDO develop outcome measures to accuratelygauge the results of agency efforts or that the WVDO utilize the expertise
of another qualied entity, such as the West Virginia University orMarshall University Schools of Business to do so. As discussed underRecommendation 1 above, outcome measures have not been developedby the WVDO. Upon inquiry from the Legislative Auditor, the WVDOindicated that it has not consulted with any outside entity to developoutcome measures.
-
8/8/2019 The WV Development Office Has Not Improved Performance Measures
14/25
pg. 1 | West Virginia Legislative Auditor
Development Ofce
-
8/8/2019 The WV Development Office Has Not Improved Performance Measures
15/25
Performance Evaluation & Research Division | pg. 1
Agency Review August 2010
In the 2007 evaluation, the Legislative Auditor recommended thathe Division conduct evaluationsannually.
The Development Ofce Has Improved Its EmployeeEvaluation System.
Recommendation 4
TheLegislativeAuditorrecommendsthattheDevelopmentOfceshouldconductemployeeevaluationsannually.
Level of Compliance: In Compliance
In conducting the 2007 evaluation of the WVDO, the LegislativeAuditor requested employee evaluations of specic positions within inthe WVDO and found that, although evaluations of some positions werecurrent, other positions had not been evaluated for several years. The2007 report stated:
Given the importance of economicdevelopmentandthelevelofcompensationallocated to the Development Ofce,performancemeasurement and employeeaccountabilityshouldbeofhighpriority.
Although the WVDO and other classied-exempt agencies do notfall under the Division of Personnel, many such agencies tend to followthe Division of Personnels policies, which require annual evaluations.Therefore, the Legislative Auditor recommended that the Divisionconduct evaluations annually.
On April 27, 2010, the Legislative Auditor requested the mostrecent employee evaluations for the same positions obtained for the 2007report. The majority of evaluations received were conducted after thisrequest was sent. Upon inquiry as to whether employee evaluations hadbeen conducted annually following the release of the 2007 report, theWVDO stated the following:
ThepolicyoftheWVDOinpreviousyearswas to conduct employee performanceappraisalsbasedonanemployeeshiringdate. However, due to factors such as
administrativepersonnelleavingforotheremployement, restructuring of the ofceanda change inexecutivedirectors, notevery employee received an employeeperformance appraisal after the releaseoftheSeptember2007PerformanceAuditoftheWVDO.Whileworkplanswereinplace tomonitor employee performance;noteveryemployeereceivedanemployeeperformance appraisal. However, in
Issue 2
In direct response to therequirement that the WVDOconduct annual appraisals or alsta, a directive rom ExecutiveDirector Kelley Goes was sen
out on May 5, 2010, stating thaall sta will be evaluated on acalendar year basis.
-
8/8/2019 The WV Development Office Has Not Improved Performance Measures
16/25
pg. 1 | West Virginia Legislative Auditor
Development Ofce
In the 2007 evaluation, the Legis-lative Auditor recommended thatthe Development Ofce shouldully complete the employeeevaluation orms.
directresponsetotherequirementthattheWVDOconductannualappraisalsforallstaff,adirectivefromExecutiveDirector
KelleyGoeswassentoutonMay5,2010,statingthatallstaffwillbeevaluatedonacalendaryearbasis(January1-December31).
This directive requiring that all staff be evaluated on a yearlybasis brings the WVDO into compliance with the recommendation madein the previous report.
Recommendation 5
TheLegislativeAuditorrecommendsthattheDevelopmentOfceshouldfullycompletetheemployeeevaluationforms.
Level of Compliance: Partial Compliance
In conducting the 2007 evaluation, the Legislative Auditorfound that some employee evaluation forms were incomplete, leavingblank pertinent sections that wouldproveusefulinidentifyingobjectivescompletedandareasofconcernduringtheevaluationperiod.Althoughseveral of the evaluations obtained in order to determine compliancewith the recommendation made in the 2007 report were incomplete,the WVDO explained the missing information and indicated plannedcompliance as follows:
The previous director of the SmallBusiness Development Center did notcomplete performance evaluations and,duetothefactthatthecurrentdirectorhasbeen employed for less than sixmonths,it is not appropriate for evaluations tobe submitted at this time; however theSmallBusinesssstaffwillbeevaluatedinJanuary of 2011The previous director
of Community Development departedforanotherpositionandwasnotabletocompletehispartoftheevaluationforonememberofhisstaff.
Evaluations for other departments were fully completed, therebycomplying with the recommendation that the WVDO complete employeeevaluation forms.
Although several o the evalu-ations obtained in order to de-
termine compliance with therecommendation made in the2007 report were incomplete, theWVDO explained the missing in-ormation and indicated plannedcompliance.
-
8/8/2019 The WV Development Office Has Not Improved Performance Measures
17/25
Performance Evaluation & Research Division | pg. 1
Agency Review August 2010
The 2007 evaluation pointed outhat employee perormance wasoten measured by outputs, suchas the number o meetings organized, rather than outcomessuch as new businesses createdWhile the WVDO still primarilyocuses on outputs rather than
outcomes as perormance measures, some outcome measuresare now being utilized.
Recommendation 6
TheLegislativeAuditorrecommendsthatoutcomesof
performancebemeasuredattheemployeelevelandthatsuchmeasuresbeattributabletotheagencysmission.
Level of Compliance: Partial Compliance
The 2007 evaluation pointed out that employee performance wasoften measured by outputs, such as the number of meetings organized,rather than outcomes, such as new businesses created. While the WVDOstill primarily focuses on outputs rather than outcomes as performancemeasures, some outcome measures are now being utilized. The WVDOindicates that all projects are
assigned a representative to assist andmonitorthevariousstagesofdevelopment.In the case of theBusiness& IndustrialDevelopment division, either a businessexpansion and retention representativefor existing industry or marketingrepresentativefornewinvestmentintothestateisassignedtotheprospectivebusiness.Additionally,WVDOrepresentativesworkwitheconomicdevelopmententities(state,local,andinternational)tobringaboutthesuccessfulcompletionofeachproject.
The WVDO generates reports to monitor performance thatmeasure such variables as new, current, and retained employment andinvestment resulting from projects handled by WVDO representatives.Additionally, the West Virginia Small Business Development Center(WVSBDC) within the WVDO monitors the impact of counselingservices performed by the WVSBDC staff including economic impactdata such as jobs created and retained, number of businesses created, andthe number of start-up rms remaining in business after one year.
Although measures of employee performance have been improved,there is no indication that the WVDO expands these measures to report
on outcomes at the agency level. As discussed in further detail underRecommendation 1, the WVDO does not measure agency outcomes,instead focusing primarily on inputs and outputs to measure agencyperformance. Since reports are generated that illustrate outcome measuresat the employee level, the WVDO should consider compiling thesegures into overall outcome measures for the agency. For example, jobscreated by projects handled by individual employees could be compiledto illustrate the total number of jobs created by all agency projects.
Although measures o employee perormance have been improved, there is no indicationthat the WVDO expands thesemeasures to report on outcomesat the agency level.
-
8/8/2019 The WV Development Office Has Not Improved Performance Measures
18/25
pg. 1 | West Virginia Legislative Auditor
Development Ofce
-
8/8/2019 The WV Development Office Has Not Improved Performance Measures
19/25
Performance Evaluation & Research Division | pg. 1
Agency Review August 2010
Appendix A: Transmittal Letter
-
8/8/2019 The WV Development Office Has Not Improved Performance Measures
20/25
pg. 20 | West Virginia Legislative Auditor
Development Ofce
-
8/8/2019 The WV Development Office Has Not Improved Performance Measures
21/25
Performance Evaluation & Research Division | pg. 2
Agency Review August 2010
Appendix B: 2009 Trade Show Cost Analysis
-
8/8/2019 The WV Development Office Has Not Improved Performance Measures
22/25
pg. 22 | West Virginia Legislative Auditor
Development Ofce
-
8/8/2019 The WV Development Office Has Not Improved Performance Measures
23/25
Performance Evaluation & Research Division | pg. 2
Agency Review August 2010
Appendix C: Agency Response
-
8/8/2019 The WV Development Office Has Not Improved Performance Measures
24/25
pg. 2 | West Virginia Legislative Auditor
Development Ofce
-
8/8/2019 The WV Development Office Has Not Improved Performance Measures
25/25
WEST VIRGINIA LEGISLATIVE AUDITOR
PERFORMANCE EVALUATION & RESEARCH DIVISION
Building 1, Room W-314, State Capitol Complex, Charleston, West Virginia 25305
t l h 1 304 347 4890 | l i t t /J i t/PERD/ d | 1 304 347 4939