BASIC ENERGY UNIT: THE VORTEX (January, 1999)

By Noel Huntley, Ph.D.

We have already referred to the basic energy unit and indicated that it is fundamentalto all entities: particles, atoms, cells, organs, mind, the planet, solar system, galaxy,universe, etc. The latter are just a few of the stable fractal levels in the universe. Theenergy unit is basically the same for all except that its parameters are more evolvedfrom particle to universe. The list of such energy units would also include the 'bits' ofinformation in the learning patterns---see articles on physical mobility. Note that anunderstanding of all entities reduces to the sine wave (or wave function).

An understanding of the geometry of this energy unit will tax the visualisationprocesses to the limit. In fact it cannot be completely visualised with 3D perceptions;and many diagrams are necessary, presented from different angles.

An atom, or any such basic entity, cannot have symmetry, for example, be spherical,and be stable, unless its formative energies utilise the fourth dimension. In fact itsgeometry extends along the gradient 3rd to 4th dimension and takes the shape of atoroid, or doughnut from a 4D view. More correctly this is a 4D-to-3D vortex.

At the time of the renowned physicist Lord Kelvin, the vortex theory was popular,along with the recognition of the ether medium through which electromagnetic wavescould travel. Modern physics, the Michelson-Morley experiment, and in particularEinstein and relativity put an end to these essential ideas---vortex and the ether.

The ether was abandoned since it couldn't be detected; moreover because acovariant ether theory---necessary for good physics and the test-of-truthrequirements---wasn't understood. Vortex theories were numerous, more so evenrecently by new-science pioneers (frowned on by academics). However, all suchvortex theories, which have included toroid-shaped vortex rings (2D-3D) and spherical(3D) vortices, fail to interest anyone but the few and in particular fail all the tests oftruth of modern physics, such as supersymmetry, nonpreferential axes (at least in3D), and generalisation.

Fortunately, and quite magically, if one adds another dimension, the perfect geometrycomes into view. Imagine the toroid, or an actual doughnut. It has a preferential axisabout which it has symmetry, that is, it does not look the same from every angle (onlya sphere does). Nevertheless, it is a good 3D-to-2D dimensional model for ourpurposes.

The energy form we must visualise is 4D to 3D , that is, one extra dimension must beadded to the common doughnut shape. This results in a symmetrical entity in 3D, that

is, a sphere. Now let us switch back to the 3D-to-2D doughnut. If we draw a planethrough this toroid so that there is symmetry on each side of the plane, that is, oneside is the mirror image of the other, these two sides represent a dual-polarity system.On the 4D-to-3D model this means the whole sphere is only one pole. Where is theother?

If one moves one's consciousness through the surface of an atom and follows aradius to the centre, what will happen? Initially, picture the 3D-to-2D doughnut, onethat is thick with a small hole in the centre. If one moves into this hole from one sideby sliding down the surface, and instead of going across the hole to the opposite parton the same side, one goes through the hole and out of the other side, it will appearas though one has flipped over and is returning on the same side. Not only is it theother, mirror-image side but if one follows the surface it will return to the same startingpoint on the outer edge, representing the unity of both poles!

Similarly with the 4D-to-3D toroid. By following the radius down one spherical poleinstead of going across the centre of the same sphere, curve through the hole into the4th dimension and it will appear as though one is returning along the same path.However, one is now in an identical anti-universe space, the opposite side or pole, inthis 4D-to-3D oscillation. By continuing along this path one eventually returns to thestarting point (which is actually beyond the surface of the atom---greater radius---anddisplaced 4th dimensionally.

One may see why such basic particles as an electron must be 'turned' twice 360degrees to return to their original orientation---not 360 degrees as with a 3D spheresuch as a ball. This is also the reason for Dirac's discovery of negative electrons andantiparticles. The 'coin' has two sides, matter/antimatter---half an oscillation each---and cannot exist without these two sides. We in 3D only perceive one side of the'coin'. The basic energy unit also explains the strange mirror-image properties foundin particle physics studies.

What is this starting point, that is, the 4D unity of the two poles? It is the surface of a4D vortex, which as we have seen has not one---as in a 3D sphere---but two spiralstowards its centre (use the 3D-to-2D doughnut model) where they meet, creating astanding wave/stationary state/oscillation, which manifests in our 3D space like analternate explosion and implosion. This means that we 'see' only the centre portion of,say, an atom's full vortex.

If one wishes to use the tesseract model it has limited but useful application . Insteadof cubes within cubes visualise spheres within spheres---close in size (touching). Pickone sphere as representing the 3D object. (This will have a particular range offrequencies corresponding to the 3rd dimension.) Now as one envisages the circlesreaching the smallest size one must imagine they continue through the point andgradually become larger on the other side. Any two corresponding circles, one on

each side, can form a fractal level or entity. Each pair represents a dual polarity andan inherent oscillation---a double helix spiral.

As an example, a planet vortex will spiral in to all its atoms or other sub-entities (thisis hierarchical). The planet oscillation, however, will contain in its own format all sub-frequencies, such as of atoms, just as we described in the article on physical mobility,how the arm joints in the human body are interrelated. A cell, for example, is a wholeunit oscillation of complex programmed modulations, and is the master control over itsconstituents but in turn it is an element in a greater whole---an organ, etc.

If one begins with the universe vortex, one should picture it spiralling in thenbranching off into slightly smaller vortices representing, say, supercluster galaxyentities. Each of the latter are then visualised as spiralling in to further offshoots,which would be galaxy clusters, and from these, galaxies branching off to groups ofsolar systems, individual solar systems then planets, atoms, etc. Thus every particleis connected to the universe oscillation through the fractal levels of planets, starsystems, galaxies, etc. But remember that each of these spirals meets its opposite tocreate the stable oscillation or stationary state.

DIAGRAMS:

Figure 1 shows a view of the basic vortex. The large circle 4D spirals in two directionsinto the 3rd dimension where they meet and create an oscillation. Note that this pointof intersection, 3D, in reality should be inside the 4D circle. Figure 4 illustrates thesame vortex and in this case shows 3D inside 4D but lacks in other respects. All thediagrams are of the same unit and should be utilised in visualising the higher-dimensional vortex view.

Figure 2 diagrams the interaction of the two spirals. This region of the interface is asphere (the dotted circle in the centre), since two 4D flows interfering create a 'solid'3D sphere, just as two intersecting one-dimensional lines create a zero-dimensionalpoint.

Figure 3 is identical to Figure 1 except that it shows a larger region of intersection at3D. Clearly, a planet, say, will have a greater region of intersection of its oscillationsthan an atom, etc.

Figure 4 is the 2D-to-3D doughnut we have described, and Figure 5 is an attempt todraw it in 3D-to-4D format. In Figure 4, both spirals are visible and they meet in thecentre. In Figure 5 they meet in the centre but only one would be seen in this diagramunless we showed a small one coming into the diagram in the centre.

FIGURE 1

FIGURE 2 FIGURE 3 FIGURE 4

FIGURE 5

FIGURE 6

Now the frequency increases from particles, through the gradient, to universe. For apossible explanation: the greater the wholeness, quantum state, or integration, thegreater the frequency---if the interaction or interface of the two spirals is greater onecould consider the force between them would be greater and therefore the frequency.In addition, the larger the entity the more elements and fractal levels it contains, andtherefore must be more intelligent, of which a higher rate of creation (frequency) is arequirement.

If one is still perplexed as to how a 4D vortex oscillation---in effect a cross-section of itcut through the centre---can produce a 'solid' sphere in 3D, we can use an analogy inwhich we reduce the dimensions by three. Picture the following: two lines intersecting.If we consider these lines as infinitely thin (one-dimensional), then their point ofintersection produces a zero-dimensional point. Now if our perception were zero-dimensional instead of 3-dimensional we would not see the lines (4D analogy); theywould be higher-dimensional. When the lines are moved, the point of intersection, likea particle, moves correspondingly. Thus similarly two 4D flows can produce, whenintersecting, a 3D solid effect surrounded by 'empty' space.

The article The Meaning of Duality referred to these same energy vortices. Theduality of 3D, and the basis for the ego manifestation, dichotomies or opposites,problems, conflict and out-of-phase conditions are provided by the centre of thevortex where the two opposite poles meet. This action/counteraction forms the basisof the 3rd-dimensional world of karma, disharmony and selfishness, etc. Thesecentral oscillations within different vortices can be out of phase with one anothergiving us a proper definition of 3D spacetime---homogeneous distribution ofparticles/oscillations out of phase with one another. However, at the surface of the 4Dvortices we have harmony. The vortices are in phase---different realities exist at thislevel.

It is relevant to note that the brilliant philosopher professor Charles Hinton worked out

that 4D rotations of such 4D spheres can all be in phase, be self-supporting, formingwhat he called a 'self-preservative living system'. Whereas if we try rotating 3Dspheres in a group which are touching, some of their motions will be contrary.

It is vital that one eradicates the simple Newtonian picture of objects in empty space,of a background absolute time and a flat continuous one-level spacetime. Betweenthe 4D surface of the vortex and its 3D center there are countless spacetime frameseach in the context of the next higher one. There is a gradient of increasingcorrelation of frequencies from the 3D out-of-phase condition to the 4D periphery ofthe vortex, where cyclic action of the positive and negative occur; the positive andnegative 'following' one another cyclically around the 'surface'. This is the non-dualstate of the Buddhist's nirvana or higher consciousness. Note that quantum reductionoccurs down the gradient from 4D to 3D between any levels, whereas in currentquantum theory, quantum reduction occurs between two levels: the quantum reality ofphase-correlation (many probabilities) to the material reality of phase-randomisation(one probability). Also quantum regeneration occurs up the gradient from lesserwholes to greater wholes (by correlating lesser wholes)---not recognised in currentscience.

Worlds, universes, can be structured at any of these levels of spacetime. Change offrequency-range keeps them segregated. Thus these worlds will have matterstructured from fully opposing flows at the 3D level through a gradient of lessopposition and greater integration between the positive and negative to theharmonious cyclic flows, in which the positive and negative poles aid one another informing the cyclic energies around the vortex periphery.

The reader may still be asking: Why vortices? Why does energy spiral? We haveanswered this briefly. It is a matter of 4D geometry, 4D oscillations, and transductionof energies from a 4D format to a 3D format. The energy must spiral to achieve thisand in turn it creates a perfect contextual system---like spheres within spheres---all'touching'. It does not take place in any space; it creates space itself at differentdimensional levels.

We shall continue to give applications of this model, where appropriate.

Note that this fundamental higher-dimensional energy configuration is a scalarphenomenon. It consists of two opposite centripetal spirals and is the basis of the so-called (within the New-Age field) Merkaba. Everything that is created will have aMerkaba field, enabling energies to transduce across dimensions. We have alsoindicated it will be fundamental to mind phenomena of a dual or polarity nature---suchas all ego perceptions (separateness, not unity).

The anti-parallel universe side of the basic energy unity indicates just that: an anti-universe with an anti-parallel planet and life. We can see though that the two sides

really form one whole, except in the lower-dimensional limited view. The question ofwhat degree of separateness do our anti-parallel selves have is speculative but anevolving consciousness must unify all such opposites and separateness---this is quitelogical.

Return to Home Page