Occupational Therapy Intervention Process Model (OTIPM)に ...
The Virginia Intervention Model:
description
Transcript of The Virginia Intervention Model:
![Page 1: The Virginia Intervention Model:](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062409/56814746550346895db482dd/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
The Virginia Intervention Model:
Evaluating Its Effectiveness for Struggling Readers Who Speak English as a Second Language
1
![Page 2: The Virginia Intervention Model:](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062409/56814746550346895db482dd/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
University of Utah Reading ClinicGranite School District
Kathleen J. Brown, Darrell Morris, Matt Fields, Stacey Lowe, Debbie Skidmore, Debbie Van Gorder, Connie Weinstein,
Julie Robertson, & Ursula Brock
2
![Page 3: The Virginia Intervention Model:](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062409/56814746550346895db482dd/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Theoretical Framework Virginia Model of Intervention:
Early Steps/Book Buddies = effective for at-risk G1 students in embedded, implicit, and explicit code classrooms
Next Steps/Howard St. = effective for struggling G2-3 students when delivered by volunteers, certified teachers, or teacher aides
(Brown, Morris, & Fields, 2002; Brown et al., 2000; Morris, Shaw, & Perney, 1990; Morris, Tyner, & Perney, 2000; Santa & Hoien, 1999)
3
![Page 4: The Virginia Intervention Model:](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062409/56814746550346895db482dd/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Theoretical Framework
Virginia Model of Intervention:
– guided reading @ instructional level– systematic, isolated code instruction– fluency instruction
– (for ES, add p.a. instruction)– (for NS, add “read to” for comp/vocab)
(Brown, Morris, & Fields, 2002; Brown et al., 2000; Invernizzi, Rosemary, Juel, & Richards, 1997; Morris, Shaw, & Perney, 1990; Morris, Tyner, & Perney, 2000; Santa & Hoien, 1999
4
![Page 5: The Virginia Intervention Model:](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062409/56814746550346895db482dd/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Research History:
1999/2000 - Early Steps pilot
2000/01 – Early Steps Follow-up; Next Steps pilot
2001/02 - Next Steps w/ strictly ELL
5
![Page 6: The Virginia Intervention Model:](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062409/56814746550346895db482dd/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Research Questions:
Is Next Steps effective for struggling readers above G1 who are classified as ELL?
Can Next Steps be delivered effectively to ELL students by non-certified educators, who are supervised by an intervention specialist?
6
![Page 7: The Virginia Intervention Model:](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062409/56814746550346895db482dd/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Method N = 111 G2-G6 students from 8 Title 1
schools identified by school as ELL
92% ethnic minority; 78% free or reduced lunch; 100% ELL
NS and Control students equivalent at baseline; reading level = “primer”
7
![Page 8: The Virginia Intervention Model:](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062409/56814746550346895db482dd/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Method Next Steps Intervention (Tx)
– 1-on-1 45 min. 2x per week– guided reading at instructional level– word study– fluency training (rate + accuracy)– “read to” for comprehension/vocab dev.
Title 1 Intervention (Control)– 45-60 min. daily small group, some 1-on-1– reinforce Open Court
8
![Page 9: The Virginia Intervention Model:](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062409/56814746550346895db482dd/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Research Questions:
Is Next Steps effective for struggling readers above G1 who are classified as ELL?
9
![Page 10: The Virginia Intervention Model:](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062409/56814746550346895db482dd/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Method Measures
– NSSI Passage Reading• 90% accuracy, grade level rate, comprehension
– WRMT (Woodcock Reading Mastery Test)
ANCOVA– Pretest scores used as covariates– Analyses:
• Next Steps Treatment vs. Control• Certified vs. Non-Certified Instructor• Non-Certified Instructor vs. Control
10
![Page 11: The Virginia Intervention Model:](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062409/56814746550346895db482dd/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Passage Reading Level Coding
Pre-PrimerReading Level
Primer1.2 (late G1)
2.1 (early G2)
2.2 (late G2)
3.0
123456
Code #
12
![Page 12: The Virginia Intervention Model:](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062409/56814746550346895db482dd/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Results: Next Steps vs. ControlNextSteps
Control F P Effectsize
NSSI Passage MReading (SD)
4.7a
(1.5)3.9b
(1.9)8.62 <.0041* .56
WRMT MWord Attack (SD)
26.3(8.3)
24.7(8.9)
7.34 <.0079* .52
WRMT Passage MComprehension(SD)
27.5(6.0)
24.5(8.2)
17.49 <.0001* .81
a almost end G2 b almost early G2
Note: pretest scores used as covariates
11
![Page 13: The Virginia Intervention Model:](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062409/56814746550346895db482dd/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Results: WRMT Percentiles
WRMT Word Attack
Next Steps Control
Grade
Average Raw
Score Percentile Equivalent Grade
Average Raw
Score Percentile Equivalent
2
26.7
79th
2
25.1
75th
3
26.2
62nd
3
22.6
51st
14
![Page 14: The Virginia Intervention Model:](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062409/56814746550346895db482dd/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Results: WRMT Percentiles
WRMT Passage Comprehension
Next Steps Control
Grade
Average Raw
Score Percentile Equivalent Grade
Average Raw
Score Percentile Equivalent
2 26.4 47th 2 23.6 38th
3 28.9 37th 3 22.4 18th
15
![Page 15: The Virginia Intervention Model:](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062409/56814746550346895db482dd/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Discussion Next Steps is effective at helping ELL readers
above G1--even in Open Court classrooms
Next Steps students gained approximately 1 year’s growth in reading ability in only 45 sessions
Contrast this with control students who gained only 1/2 year’s growth in well over 100 sessions
16
![Page 16: The Virginia Intervention Model:](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062409/56814746550346895db482dd/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Discussion
What makes Virginia model effective?– 1-on-1– targets instructional level – systematic, isolated decoding instruction– fluency work– pacing: “raise the bar” ASAP– time on task (packed 45 min.-->1 hour/week
reading aloud on level w/feedback)
![Page 17: The Virginia Intervention Model:](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062409/56814746550346895db482dd/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Limitations intervention format differences
– tx = all 1-on-1– control = some 1-on-1; mostly small grp
• FAVORS TX GROUP!
– Control = 120+ sessions@45-60 minutes– tx = 45 sessions@45 minutes
• FAVORS CONTROL GROUP!
21
![Page 18: The Virginia Intervention Model:](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062409/56814746550346895db482dd/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Research Questions:
Can Next Steps be delivered effectively to ELL students by non-certified educators, who are supervised by an intervention specialist?
17
![Page 19: The Virginia Intervention Model:](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062409/56814746550346895db482dd/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Results: Non-Certified vs. Control
Non-Certified
Control F P Effectsize
NSSI Passage MReading (SD)
4.5a
(1.5)3.9b
(1.9)7.42 <.0077* .59
WRMT MWord Attack (SD)
25.7(8.2)
24.7(8.9)
6.20 <.0146* .54
WRMT Passage MComprehension (SD)
27.7(5.9)
24.5(8.2)
17.09 <.0001* .89
a middle G2 b almost early G2
18
![Page 20: The Virginia Intervention Model:](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062409/56814746550346895db482dd/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Results: Certified vs. Non-Certified
Certified Non-Cert
F P Effectsize
NSSI Passage MReading (SD)
4.9a
(1.7)4.5b
(1.5)0.02 .8924 n.s.
WRMT MWord Attack (SD)
27.7(8.6)
25.7(8.2)
0.01 .5079 n.s.
WRMT MComprehension (SD)
26.9(6.3)
27.7(6.0)
.45 .3243 n.s.
a almost end G2 b middle G2
19
![Page 21: The Virginia Intervention Model:](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062409/56814746550346895db482dd/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Discussion Next Steps can be delivered effectively to ELL
students by non-certified educators
– with supervision from intervention specialist
Next Steps students tutored by non-certified educators significantly outperformed control students on all measures
No significant differences between Next Steps students tutored by certified and noncertified educators
20
![Page 22: The Virginia Intervention Model:](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062409/56814746550346895db482dd/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Discussion
What accounts for effectiveness of non-certified personnel?– all participants supervised by IS– high experience level – practicum model = ongoing mentoring
• modeling• observation• feedback
2222
![Page 23: The Virginia Intervention Model:](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062409/56814746550346895db482dd/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Discussion ELLs present complex issues; must resist
“label”– Porfirio: G3 = late G1 reader--> 1 yr
of NS-->late G2 reader-->no intervention-->now in G5 = G6 reader
– Juan: G5 = late G1 reader--> 1 yr of NS -->still late G1-->1 yr of OG-->now in G6 = late G2 reader
2222
![Page 24: The Virginia Intervention Model:](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062409/56814746550346895db482dd/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
Future Research Does performance trajectory continue at desired
levels when Early Steps is followed by Next Steps in grade 2?
How does the “size of the group” impact the effectiveness of the Virginia Model? To what extent is it effective in pairs? small group?
Does group size interact with severity of reading difficulty? Who really needs 1-on-1 and who can “make it” with pair or even small group instruction?
21