The Value of Systems Integration

Johnson Controls, IncPulse 2008 Conference

2

Value of Integration

Defining hidden functional failures or actual alarms

Knowledge of developing operational Issues

Capacity, configuration & installation mgmt.

Identify root cause & effect

Automate - On-condition tasking, facility org.

Remediate issues before they become alarms

Sustaining energy efficiency targets

Actual cost allocations based on data.

3

Today’s Issues

Hidden Issues w/ financial & Ops consequences

Little knowledge of cause and effect

No reliable tie to energy benchmarks

Inconsistent condition validation

Inconsistent operational efficiency

Manual Method of information transfer to the maintenance organization

Limited use of technology for cost allocation.

4

Integration of Information

Metasys Tivoli

Maximo

Integrator

Solution TeamProcessTechnologyPeople

5

Case Study – Value of Integration

Value of system data for cause & effect

Value of condition indicators

Energy as a “Sentinel” indicator

Automated “Conditional” work order generation

Optimization of energy usage

Discovery of “hidden” functional failures.

6

Background Information

Problem – Spot Capacity Issue

60K Sq ft of Raised Floor

2 floors 30K sq. ft. each

Chilled water loop, 60 CRAC Units (Total)

50% of CRAC Units fully configured

7

Defining the Scope & Scale of the Issue

40.000 50.000 60.000 62.000 64.000 65.000 66.000 67.000 68.000 68.500 69.000 69.500 70.000 70.500 71.000 71.500 72.000 72.500 73.000 73.500 74.000 74.500 75.000 75.500 76.000 76.500 77.000 78.000 79.000 80.000 above

ABC CompanyComputer Room

Ambient Temperature-3ft. Level

Z

AB

AD

AF

AH

AJ

AL

AN

AP

AR

AT

AV

AX

AZ

BB

BD

BF

BH

BJ

BL

5101520253035404550556065707580

• BAS• NMS• Manual Data collection

Source:

8

Integration of System Data

40.000 50.000 60.000 62.000 64.000 65.000 66.000 67.000 68.000 68.500 69.000 69.500 70.000 70.500 71.000 71.500 72.000 72.500 73.000 73.500 74.000 74.500 75.000 75.500 76.000 76.500 77.000 78.000 79.000 80.000 above

ABC CompanyComputer Room

Ambient Temperature-3ft. Level

Z

AB

AD

AF

AH

AJ

AL

AN

AP

AR

AT

AV

AX

AZ

BB

BD

BF

BH

BJ

BL

5101520253035404550556065707580

Integration of:• IT SystemInformation

Source: NMS

9

Integration of Configuration Data

40.000 50.000 60.000 62.000 64.000 65.000 66.000 67.000 68.000 68.500 69.000 69.500 70.000 70.500 71.000 71.500 72.000 72.500 73.000 73.500 74.000 74.500 75.000 75.500 76.000 76.500 77.000 78.000 79.000 80.000 above

ABC CompanyComputer Room

Ambient Temperature-3ft. Level

Z

AB

AD

AF

AH

AJ

AL

AN

AP

AR

AT

AV

AX

AZ

BB

BD

BF

BH

BJ

BL

5101520253035404550556065707580

Integration of:• Configuration Drawings

Source: CMMS

10

Quantify Performance via Energy usage

Measure OperationalEfficiencyagainst baseline

Source: BAS/CMMS

11

Energy as a “Sentinel” Indicator

Data Center D/C EE Ratio

(Energy Efficiency Index)

(Support Sys. vs. Critical Load Ratio)

0.556 2.250

2.500Baseline Ratio

Current Ratio

.600

Source: CMMS (Historical)

12

Energy as a “Sentinel” Indicator

Data Center D/C EE Ratio

(Energy Efficiency Index)

(Support Sys. vs. Critical Load Ratio)

0.556 2.250

2.500Baseline Ratio

Current Ratio 2.580.600

.608

Source: BAS (Current)

13

CMMS - Job Plan Auto Generation

FREQTYP

E   TASKING   R&R PMPDM

PAM

On Condition Tasks R&R 10

CHECK ADJACENT UNITS FOR STANDARDIZED OPERATIONAL SETTINGS AND SIGNATURE – Affected areas

0.20 0.10      

  R&R 20

CHECK CONDENSTATE ON ADJACENT UNITS, IF YES, CHECK OPERATION OF VALVE

0.10  

0.10  

  PAM 30LOG OPERATION PARAMETERS DURING THIS TASK 0.10

0.1     

  R&R 40

CHECK POSITION OF CW VALVE AGAINST CURRENT % COOLING ON PANEL

0.20  

  0.20

Total 0.70 0.20 0.10 0.00 0.20

14

CRAC Unit Operating Signatures

40.000 50.000 60.000 62.000 64.000 65.000 66.000 67.000 68.000 68.500 69.000 69.500 70.000 70.500 71.000 71.500 72.000 72.500 73.000 73.500 74.000 74.500 75.000 75.500 76.000 76.500 77.000 78.000 79.000 80.000 above

ABC CompanyComputer Room

Ambient Temperature-3ft. Level

Z

AB

AD

AF

AH

AJ

AL

AN

AP

AR

AT

AV

AX

AZ

BB

BD

BF

BH

BJ

BL

5101520253035404550556065707580

Integration of• IT SystemInformation• Drawings• BAS• Manual Data

Verification of Performance

15

CRAC Unit – Poor Operating Signature

16

CMMS - Job Plan Execution

FREQTYP

E   TASKING   R&R PMPDM

PAM

On Condition Tasks R&R 10

CHECK ADJACENT UNITS FOR STANDARDIZED OPERATIONAL SETTINGS AND SIGNATURE – Affected areas

0.20 0.10      

  R&R 20

CHECK CONDENSTATE ON ADJACENT UNITS, IF YES, CHECK OPERATION OF VALVE

0.10  

0.10  

  PAM 30LOG OPERATION PARAMETERS DURING THIS TASK 0.10

0.1     

  R&R 40

CHECK POSITION OF CW VALVE AGAINST CURRENT % COOLING ON PANEL

0.20  

  0.20

Total 0.70 0.20 0.10 0.00 0.20

17

CRAC Unit – Good Operating Signature

18

Review - (Signature Before)

40.000 50.000 60.000 62.000 64.000 65.000 66.000 67.000 68.000 68.500 69.000 69.500 70.000 70.500 71.000 71.500 72.000 72.500 73.000 73.500 74.000 74.500 75.000 75.500 76.000 76.500 77.000 78.000 79.000 80.000 above

ABC CompanyComputer Room

Ambient Temperature-3ft. Level

Z

AB

AD

AF

AH

AJ

AL

AN

AP

AR

AT

AV

AX

AZ

BB

BD

BF

BH

BJ

BL

5101520253035404550556065707580

19

Validation of Results - (After)

60.000 61.000 62.000 63.000 64.000 65.000 66.000 67.000 68.000 68.500 69.000 69.500 70.000 70.500 71.000 71.500 72.000 72.500 73.000 73.500 74.000 74.500 75.000 75.500 76.000 76.500 77.000 78.000 79.000 80.000 above

ABC CompanyComputer Room

Ambient Temperature-3ft. Level

Z

AB

AD

AF

AH

AJ

AL

AN

AP

AR

AT

AV

AX

AZ

BB

BD

BF

BH

BJ

BL

5101520253035404550556065707580

Validate Resultsof RemediationActivities• IT NMS• BAS

20

Case Study Results

Temperature variances mitigated

Gain back of 68 tons of cooling

Decrease of 280 KW of energy consumption

IT server performance: extended MTBF

Process used to adjust maintenance plansOn condition tasking

Continuous verification of performance vs. baseline

Validation effect of maintenance with energy usage

Financial gain - $97.5K/year, 1 location

21

Summary – Process Automation

Metasys Tivoli

Maximo

Integrator

Solution TeamProcessTechnologyPeople

22

Summary - Value of Integration

ID of Hidden functional failures – No alarms present

Knowledge of developing operational Issues

Automation of on-condition tasking for facility org.

Identification of root cause & effect

Mgmt of load to available resources (Capacity Mgmt)

Record of asset/system information & trends (CMMS)

Sustaining energy efficiency targets

Optimized operating costs & allocations.

Installation Management

23

Thank You!