the Utah - files.eric.ed.gov · PDF fileINSTITUTION Utah State Board of Higher Education, Salt...
Transcript of the Utah - files.eric.ed.gov · PDF fileINSTITUTION Utah State Board of Higher Education, Salt...
(v
ED "13 972
0
DOCUMENT !IEGUIE
HE 007 773
Sixth 6lual Report to the. Governor and theLegislature, Utah State Boards of Regents,
,
1974-75.INSTITUTION Utah State Board of Higher Education, Salt Like
City.PUB DATE * Dec 75NOTE 1B1p.; Some tables and parts_of text may be.
marginally legible due to small typer-}
EDRS' PRICE MF-$0.8.3.HC-$10.03 Plus Postage.'DESCRIPTORS *Annual:Deports;.Comparative Analysis; Curriculum;
Degrees (Titles); .*Educational EducationalPlanning; Enrollment; *Government Role; *HigherEdhcation; *Staiewide-Planing; Statistical Data;Trend Analysis
IDhITIFIERS *Utah -
ABSTRACA'This 1974-75. Annual report of the Utah .State Board of
RegentA.covers: (1) role and curriculum. studies; (2) .Cooperation withNICHE; 53) veterans approval progra'm; (4) statewide educationaltelevision; (5) degrees conferrep, (6).degrees:conferred.comParative.
VP chart, 1967 -68 with 1974-75; (7) appropriation comparative chart,1966-67, 1974-75; (8)-inflation and enrollient increases; (9) fee
comparisons, 1974-75; (10) enroflment'planning.mbdel; ,(11) enrollment.projections; (12) Utah live births',1940-74; 413). high ,schoolintentions comparison, 1968-75; (14) autumnr'enrallment comparison,1969-75; and (15) profiles of member institutions. (Author/KE)
A
I
4
f
)
. .
******************************1,************************************4***--. \.
* Documents acquired by ERIC include many informal unpublished\ *
* materials not available ftom other^sources. ERIC makes every effort,** to obtain the.Ast,coPy available. Nevertheless, items of marginal *
* reproducibility are often encountered and this affects the quality *
* of the microfiche and hatAcopy reproductions ERIC. makes available *
* .via the ERIC Document Reproduction.SerVice 4EDRS). EDRS is not. *
. . * responsible tdr the quality of thepriginal% document. Reproductions ** supplied4py EDRS are the .best that can be made" from the original. *
********************************************44*************************
SIXTH 1 VNUAL REPORTTOJTIIE GO6' ER,V0.1? LEGISLATURE
Olin STATE BOARD OF,I - REGENTS
A
10:74-75
"Published'December 1975
1,1
/969
1,89E.
rarEBo D OF
wrYjn
6'1:qrE BOARD
r.
Preface
.
o
This report is submitted in fulfillment, of the State Board ofRegent's i!tatutory obligation to report annually to the Governorand Legislature of the State of Utah.
It does t replace, substitute for, nor duplicate the necessary fi-nancial and of er reports regularly issued by each member institutionof the Utah Sy tem of Higher Education. Such documents, together.with catalogs and other information,Sreavailable from the offices ofthe various college and ,university presidents.
Appreciation is acknowledged to B. Jackson Wixom, Jr., espe-cially,and to all members of the staff for their assistance to him, incompiling 'Nand, editing the detailed information contained in thisreport.
G. Homer DurhamCommissioner-orlfigher'Education
kr,
Sixth Annual Report to the Governor
and the Legislature
Utah State Boardof Regents
1974-75
Published by theOffice of the Commissioner of Higher E cation
UTAH STATE BOARD OF REG NTS136 East South Temple Street Suite 1201
Salt Lake City, Utah 84111
December 1975
Forettiord
r
Regent Chairman, George C.Hatch, sees cooperation andas key elements in 1974-76.
MaturityDemonstrated
ContinualSupports
Copper-ado and trust might best describe the Utah System ofHigher Edu tion operations, dtiring the sixth year under the leader-
, ship,of the State Board of, Regents.
A mature cooperation among the component parts of the Systemhas inspired a growing trust froth higher education's supportingcommunity, including the Utah State Legislature, _
I am gratified as Staie Board of Regents' chairman to make whatI feel the Most positive report of our accomplishment this far. Thepages of this, the Sixth Annual Report, detail the substance of theSystem and its past year's accomplishments. ,
Last year's budget:making.process provides, a concrete example ofthe system's maturity. In developing the $139.3 million budget,submitted to the 11975 Utah Ldgislature, the institutions rallied be-hind Regent decisions. Once the Regents had finalized their recom-mendations, the institutions, ceased competing and lent their supportin mature recognition of available furrdiqLand the, limits imposedby the state' esources,
islat c agreed. For the first time, as' budget submittedby the Stat ioa d bf Regents received the support of the HigherEducation Joi Appropriations Subcommittee. gthe Committeeadopted the keg t,,tudget as its working figure March 13, 1975.
Revenue co raints prevented the Legislature from fully fundingthe Subcommittee recommendation, but the lawmakers recognizedand funded major needs represented in the Regents' proposal. Classified employees, for exarskple, were authorized the salary imprOvement
Erecommended by the Regents. Even in trimming the state appro-priation portion of, the budget to available revenues The legislatorschose to retain the fund distribution among the institutions included
in the Regents' recommendations,
Continued institutional, citizen and legislative support for the 'Re-
gents' vocational - technical education program is yet another 'tx-ample of System maturity. The Utah Senate voted down an attemptto remove the two Utah Technical Colleges from the System ofHigher Education, apparently recognizing. the ty role vocational-technical education plays in Utah's entire pos ondary educationprogram and the importance of .state-wide coo diriation. of theirfinances and programs.
We are grateful to continue expanding advanced vocational-technical opportunities . for our students. One of the important
iiiir
Ar,
.7.1,1*.4 '" .04.4P '4' 1
studies undertaken as part of the year's master planning.,proeessdealt with the future of vocational-technical programming. Theplan for the next ten years calls forexpanding open-entrance, open-
) exit, and individualized self-paced instruction. We see great, promisein the flexible programs long in use, and their expansion will better
serve Utah's students, also prospectiv4mployers.
Internally, a great step toward maturity came with the adoptionin March of, a statewide tuition policy. Besides fixing relationshipsin r6iderit -tuition levels among the institutions particularly be-tween institutions of similar role"--.- the n4v policy establishes therelationships between nonresident tuition and resident tuition at theinstitution. Any increase in resident tuition requires an automaticincrease in no-nresitdent tuition at 250 percent of the resident increase.
A Year Master planning occupied mach' of the year's efforts. As the yearfor
Mastert drew tc a close, We were able to aclikvand print basic assumptions
Planning and goals to govern our ongoing mast6rplorming efforts: Thanks, toa small plant from the federal government and the assistance of Dr.Vaughn L. Hall, Associate superintendent of- Public Instruction,President 'Manford A. Shaw, ,Westminster College, nandStoner, chairman of the State Manpower Planfiing Council, we wereable to draw many interested parties into the planning process.
7iv
Chairman Hatch welcomps newPresident and awards degrees aspart of duties.
<4
We ;}re hopeful that the passagg of Senate.Bill 41Nefining the"general control' and supervision", role of ,the State Board of Edu-
cation as provided in ;Article I the state constitution, puts at rest
other problems recently experienced. Utah's Legislature in 1850established a permanent Flitch for higher education tinder a Board
of Regents. By properly setting legislative guidelines for Board of
Education policies to speak broadly to all education levels fromkindergarten through graduate school, the legislators recognized the
necessity of continuing the Utah tradition of an independent systemof higher education. At the same time the Legislature recognized
that as policies which should apply throughout all levels of educationbectome necessary, the Roard of Education's broad perspective would
he welcomed in such area. a
Speaking for my colleagues on the Board of ,Reger;its, the staffs
which support our efforts and thwesidents oldie member institu-
tions in the Utah System of HiAkf Education, we, are proud ofUtah's exc client educational heritage. We are grateful to serve in
an organization, which enjoys the support of the citizenry so aptly
represented through tho state's chief executive and its legiMators:
8
I
George C. 1-1,itchChairmanSlate Boar Regents,
, October 20, 975
O
Table of Contents.
Foreword
Table of Contents vi
Members, Utah State Board of Regents viii
Utah Joint Legislative InterimStudy CoMmittee on Higher EdUcation ix
Member Institutions and Presidents, Utah Systemof Higher Education
Member Institutional Cogecils xi
Committees, State Board of Regents xiiitit
Regent Group Picture (November 1975) Xiv
Administrative Stair 3 xv ..0
1. Commissioner's Report1
I I, Events' of the Year 9k
111. Academic Affairs -19
Figure '1e-flexible Vocational- Technical Model.
ole and Curricular Studies^s... .
, .. tidies in Progress/Pr iposed Programs ApprovedP grams Disapproved or Discontinued
4
20
21
21
22Role Assignments ,, 2.3
Changes in Academic Program 23,"'Changes in the System 24,
Cooperation with WICHE 26'Veterans Approvail Program 27
Statewide Educational Televis' ion ;.,. 29'
Degrees Conferred 32
V,i P
''Figure 2 Degrees Conferred ComparativeChart, .1967-68 1'974-75 33
Tables Index 34.
IV. Budgets iend Finance .87
Figure 1 Appropriation ComparaiiVeChart,1966-67, 1974-75. n--A 87
Figure 2 Legislative- Appropriations 1974-75 88
Figure 3 Impact of Ihflation `90Inflation and Enrollment increases '
Figure 4 c'ec Comparisons 1974-75 91
Tables Index
V. Planning and Capital Facilities 103
Figure 1 Enrollment Planning Model 4.63z
Figure 2 Enrollment ProjectiOns,
104
Figure 3 Utah Live Births 1940-1974 105
Figure 4 High School Intentions Comparis1968-1975 )06
Figure 5 Autumn Enrollment Compari. on'1969-1975 107
Computing, in the System 109
Tables Index 14 0
VI. Pr6files of Member Institutions 145
Ut.ali) Location Map 147j,
Index a 160
. .
1 0
VII
kD
Membeys, OA State Boa
Established '1969
egents,
Terms Expire...,
George C. Hat hairman, Salt Lake City 1977...........,Charles E. Peterson,' V,ice-airman, Provo 1979
.Peter W. illings, Salt Lake City tot , 1981...Warren . Bulloch, Cedar City --,.,{A 1977
D. Omer Bpttars, Ogden ... ."...4479,..J. Lynn Dougan, Salt )Jake City , 1977Kendrick H.^Harward, Richfield 1979Donald B. Holbrook, Salt Lake City 1981Ira A. Huggins, Ogden 1977Thomas S. Monson, Salt:lake City . 1981
,'Mrs.. Jean Overfelt, Salt Lake City 1979Luke G. Pappas,. Price' ,.' .1981
Rex G. Plowman, Lewiston , 1977
-Roy-W. Sinfmons, Kaysale 1981
H. Bruce Stucki, St. George 1979
Gt Homer DurhamCommissioner of Higher Education and Chief Executive 0 fficer
11I
f
Utah Joint Legislative Study Commkteeon Pigher.EdUcation
* Establisd 1975
g
SENATE
Senikeor Keith. C. Warner, Clearfield, ChairmanSerator Reed Bullen, Logan, Vice-chairmanSenator Dixie Leavitt, Cedar Ciey,Senator Karl G. Swan, Tootle
HOUSE
Representative Mike Dmitrich Price, ChairmanRepresentative Minnie' S. Dennis, Roosevelt, Vice-chairmanRepresentative David C. Harvey,-Picasant GroveRepresentative 1tephen Holbrook, Salt Lake CityRepresentative Mary Lorraine Johnson, Sal\ Lake CityRepresentative David R. Nemclka, Salt 4...ake 'CityRepresentative Samuel S. Taylor, Salt Lac CityRepresentative M. Byron Fisher, Salt Lake CilyRepresentative Ronald 1'. Halverson, OgdenRepresentative LeRay McAllister, OremRepresentative Homer F. Wilkinson, Salt Lake City
The Legislative Organization Act of 1975, Chapter 109, Laws of Utah 1975,reorganized the legislative interim committees, doing away with the LegislatiyePlanning Committee on Higher Education of the Legislative Council. This new 7"interim study committee consists of the joint membership of eht highereduca-tion. standing committees of both houses of the Utah Starr Legislature.
ix
at
Atiember Instituti s and Presicknts,Utah 'System of I4igher Education
Utah. tate Board 9f Regents, 136 East South Temple Sk2;Surt0 201,Salt Lake City 841
G. flome4 Durhain, Coxnmissior r of Higher Education andChi Executive-Officer
Universit of 11 (1850) Salt Lake City, 84112David P. .ardner, 'President
'Utah Statr University: of Agriculture and Applied Scien& (1888)Logan; .84322Glen L: Taggart, President
Wehfr State College (1889) Ogden, 84403Joseph L. BiShpp, PreSident
"Southern Utah State Colteg5 (1897) Cedar Ci y, 84720Royder . Braithwaite, P °resident
SnoW College (1888.) Ephraini, 84627J.. Marvin Higbee, President
Dixie'college (19.11) St. George, 84770Perion C. Losee, President
College of Eastern Utah ( 1937) Price, 84501Dean M. McDonald, President
o
Utalitechnical College at 'Provo (1941) Provo, 84601Wilsn W." Sorensen, President
Ufah Technical College at. Salt Lake (1947) S4,1t Lake City, $4107Jay L Nelson,.President
7
4
13
a
,
1
The Institutional CouncilsAnd Their Members
UNIVERSITY OF *UTAH(Salt Lake City)
David P. Gardner, PresidentDouglas F. BennettJoseph E. Bernolfo, Jr., Vice-chm.Reed W. BrintonEdward W. Clyde, ChairmanMrs.fettYe B. Gillespie
-Root H. Hinckley, JrH oxvp rd A. JorgensenFullmer ,LatterCalvin W. RavilingsMrs. Dorothy NAirtkis.i.
UTAH STATEUNIVERSITY(Logan)
Glen L. Taggart, PresidentL. Brent HogganBruce S. JenkinsNolan JohnsonBeverly D. KumpferGlenn J.. Mecham, ChairmanSnell OlsenMrs. Leah D. ParkinsonW: B. RobinsAlva SnowMr's. Jane Tibbals, Vice-chrn.
f
N.
WEBER STATE COLLEGE(Ogden)
Joseph L.. Bishop, President'L. Kent BachmanJoseph F. BreezeDale T. Browning, ChairmanFrank. Francis, Jr.Dr. D. B. GreenRobert T, Heiner, Vice-chairman,Bruce Jenkins
. Kyle Mattson.Mrs. Patricia OliverHarold C. Steed
SOUTHERN. UTAII,STATECOLLEGE (Cesar CitY)-
Royden C. Braithwaite, PresideripDavid L. BiglerMrs. Loretta ClineDr. Reed W. Farnsworth,
Vice - chairmanKumen S. Gardner, ChairmanRobin HaightElloyd T. MarchantJohn F. PierceyRalph BPowning PlattJim R. ScarthRObert R. Sonntag
14xi
stitutiontd Councils, (continued)
-SN W COLLEGE,(Eph aim)
J. Marvin Higflee, PresidentLinn J. BakerAngus H. Iielliston, ChairmanRalph BlackhamWard C. KilipackArthur 1-1. .Nielsen, Vice-chmn.Mrs. LaR e NielsenJohn D. WchardsA. Theodo p TuttleRichard T. WaddinghamDarrell W. arren
DIXIE COLLEGE'(St. George)
Ferron C. Losee, PresidentRudger C. AtkinMrs, Sue Halliday
, H, (Bernell LewisNeal M. LundbergJack LuntDr. A. W. McGreg-Willard A. NissonDr. Richard G. W headWayn'e White d, hairmanMrs. Sandr. Wilkins
COLLEGE OF EASTERNUTAH (Price)
limn M. McDonald, identMrs. Bettina BlackBryce K. 3rynerDuane A. Frandsen0. Eugene JohansenHarold LymanScott T. MorleyJack PressettF. Bennion ReddOrson B. Spencer, Chairman.A. S. Veltri
UTAH TECHNICCOLLEGE AT OVO*
Wilson W) rensson, President
All TECHNICALCOLLEGE AT SALT LAKE*
Jay L. Nelson, President
* By la, the 'Utah 4tate Board for Vocational Education is the governing boardfor oth,thah)Technical Colleges. Its members include: Sheldon S: Allred,J e Anderson, R. D. Anderson, Mrs. Lila Bjorklund, Mrs. Joan Burn ide, A.
lenn Christensen, Stephen L. Garret, Reuben D. Law, Vice-chairman, J nL. Owen, Charles W, Peters, W. Robert Wright, Chairman..
15.xii
Utah Stat oard of RegentsCommitte sand Members
EXECUTIV
GeQrge C. Hatch, ChairmanCharles E. Peterson,-Vice-chmn.Peter W. Billings`Donald B. Holbrook.Roy W. SimmonsH. Bruce.Stucki
PLANNING ANDCAPITAL FACILITIES
J. Lynn Dougan, ChairmanIra A. Huggins, Vice-chinn.Warren H. BulloD. Omer ButtDonald B. HolbrocrkKendrick H. HarwardRex G."P,lowinanRoy W. SimmonsH. Bruce Stucki
SPECIAL
ci"'.A.CULTY WORKLOVAND TE URE
Peter W. illingst ChairmanD. Omc ButtargKendri H. HarwardDonald B. HolbrookThomas S. MonsonMrs. Jean OverfeltH. Bruce Stucki
t
BUDGET 'AND FINANCE
Roy W. Simmons, ChairmanH. Bruce Stucki, Vice-chmn.Peter W.-BillingsD. Omer ButtarsKendrick H.'HarwardThomas S. MonsonRex, G. PlowmanN
CURRICULUM, ROLES AND,VOCAT-FONAL-TECHNICAL
TRAINING
Mrs. Jean OverfeJt; ChairmanPeter W. Billings,'Vice-chmii.'D. Orrier ButtarsDonald B. HolbrookThon;as S. MonsonLuke G. Pappas.,
COMMITTEES
COMMUNITY COLLEGES
Kendrick H.Hankard, ChairmanWarren H. BullochMrs. Jean OverfeltLuke G. Pappa.s,
ti
LEGISLATION AND 4LITIGATION-
Ira3. Huggins, ChairmanPeter .W. Billings-J. Lynn Dougan '
-Luke G. Pappas,
XIII
1
q
Mem
bers
of
the
Uta
h St
ate
Boa
rd o
f R
egen
ts, N
ovem
ber
1975
rr
(Fro
m L
eft)
,Fro
nt R
ow: R
ex G
. Plo
wm
an, M
rs. J
ean
Ove
rfel
t, W
arre
n H
. Bul
loch
, D. O
mer
But
tars
, Roy
W.
Sim
mon
s, J
. Lyn
n D
ouga
n, H
. Bru
ce S
tuck
i, G
. Hci
mer
Dur
ham
, com
mis
sion
er a
nd c
hief
exe
cutiv
e of
fice
r; S
econ
dR
ow: L
uke
G. P
appa
s, G
eorg
e C
. Hat
ch, c
hair
man
, Ken
dric
k H
. Har
war
d,Pe
ter
W. B
illin
gs; C
harl
es E
. Pet
erso
n,vi
ce-c
hair
man
, Tho
mas
S. M
onso
n. S
ee in
sert
for
rege
nts
not a
vaila
ble
for
grou
p pi
ctur
e: L
eft,
Don
ald
B. H
ol-
broo
k, R
ight
, Ira
A. H
iggi
ns.
Administrative Staff, Office of theCommissioner of Higher Education
136 East South Temple Strqet, Suite 1Salt Lake City, Utah 84111Telephone ( 801) 533-5617
(Dec. 12, 1975)
Commissioner of Higher Education and Chief ExecutiveOfficer of the Board G. Homer Durham, Ph,D.Administrative Secretary 'Mrs. Joyce B. Fox
Information Officer B. Jackson Wixom, Jr., M.S.J.
Secretarial Assistant Mrs. Janet Demman
Associate Commissioner and Director ofAcademic Affairs Leon R. McCarreySecretary Mrs.- Lti. Larson 1
Assistant Director of Academic Affairs Terry D.. Alger, Ph.D.
Assistant Director of Academic Affairs .. Don A. Gaiperiter, Ph.D.
Research Assistant Berniece Goebel
Coordinator of Veterans Affairs ..... Sterling R. Provost, EdD.
Director, Title I Programs and Coordinator. Statewide Television T. M. Williams, Ph.D.
Associatt Commissionerind Director ofBusiness Affairs Myron R. Holbert, M.A.Secretary Mrs. Afton C. Greaves
Administrative Assistant \ Helen Christensen
Assistant Director of Financial Studies andAccounting Systems 'and Supervising s\,
Internal Examiner Derald V. Johdon, M.B.A., C.P.A.
Assistant Director for InstitutionalStudies , Richard W. Jacobs, Ph.D.
IntAsstant Directoi. of Budgets W. Ralph Hardy, M.B.A.
nal Examiner Howard W. Knight, B.S.
Internal Examiner James 0. Carroll, B.S.
Accounting Clerk/Secretary Allen Ai,
,Assistant Gommissioncr and Director ofPlanning Harden, R. Erring, J.D.Secretary. Mrs._ Irene I. McKell
xv 18 ,
%.*
I. Commissioner's Report
Budget making is a challengingduty for G. Homer Durham, Utah'sCommissioner of Higher Education.'
19
z /,
a
UnparalleledSport
BUDGET-MAKINGOne of the more challenging duties as Commissioner of .Higher
.Educuion is, the quest to realistically'implement Section 10 .Of. the
Higher Education Act of 1969 budget-making for the nine verydifferent institutions comprising the Utah Systerh of Higher Educa-
tion. The needs iind wants of Utah's higher education institutionsalways exceed the state's available revenues, despite an extraordinarywillingness on the par o our elected repr ntatives to meet theaspirations of Utah's people.
The same quest has involved elh Regent and eaChpresident ofthe two universities and the seven colleges comprising the System.
q,.Utah's history shows unparalleled support for creating and main-
taining universities and colleges. Our two Technical Colleges have-
been added in recent years. Skills Centers, at Weber State Collegeand Utah:- Technical College at Salt LA-lit are numbered among the
ma's'f' recent additions. Our citizens deskve credit for their efforts-f----Ailiand sacrifice in providing educational opportunity or Taxing,
themselves more heavily for higher education than the resi ents of .
nearly every other state in the nation, Utah citizens deserve appri-
priate pride for this effort.
Withlarge families, per capita dollar income of Utah residents
lags behind the American average. Utah's tax 'efforts consequently
produce fewer state dollars per student enrolled than other states,
in, some cases'only ;half as much. Here lies the major difficulty inmeeting institutional aspirations. Limited resources espeCially have
been insufficient to develop ufl-fledged state hinds for .university,operations at the graduate ley I. When the state's needs for a medical
-school and advanced graduate work became apparent, President A.
Ray Olpin of the University of Utah showed how this could be done,
with ingenuity, resourcefulness, and skill: (1) Secure, with thestate's resources, a few outstandin,g faculty members in selected,
needed fields; (2",: take advantage of national concerns alid secureouts le, usually federal, grants-in-aid for fundamental research andprofessional work. President Olpin Showed the way and was quickly
followed by Utah State University and succeeding administfators at
the University of Utah. Today, the University of Utah and UtahState University each receive and earn more outside support (for the
College of Medicine and their specific contractual or research grant
obligations) than the tax dollaf7; appropriated to the annually -by
the State of Utah. O'his phenornena, together with th University
SmallStatewide
Office
Hospital (which operates on only ont-fifth of the smallest state sub-sidy afforded for any other state university teaching hospital),'hasto be reckoned as one of the major miracles of American highereducation.
.,,.
In like manner, most.state functionaries in other American state-4wide offices gasp when they learn that limb's statewide office, theOffice of the Commissioner of Higher-Education, operates with a
. small, compact 5taff of only fourteen profesAional academic andbusiness specialists, with excellent clerical and administrative supportfrom)seven Others.
It was not long before the ingenuit'y and resourceful character ofthe "Olpin Model" stimulated Utah's seven colleges. As the two
Idstate universities became full-fl ged, major universities after- 1945,so, the comnivnity; technical, a id four-year colleges aspired to excelin their fields of service. The state responded ricably in the 1960'swith a bonding-building program. Today, each Of the nine stateinstitutions is generally well-housed, and if, by virtue of its enroll-ments, cannot build a library, union buildings, or'gRecial eventscenters without state appropriations* (by outside or special studentfunds), the smaller ones similarly aspire, and, gradually, similarlyachieve with the help of state appropriations.
Comm.issioner's staff includes only14 professional and 7 clericalpersonnel.
.04
In 1969, the State Board of Regents 1..,eps created, in ,part to at- ,tempt mitigatirig financial. frustrations. It was the hope of boththe bltie ribbon committee` which recommended its creation, and theLegislature wh.ic,-h actually gave it birth, that the Utah System ofHigher Education might devise a bucket-making plan which woulddefuse some of the frustrations. Only the naive expected '.Utah tospend, any less for higher education than before, 1969. But hopeappeared that a more efficient and effective use of the existing re-
.sourcd would he possible.
Budget As I assumed Ill y responsibilities as the first chief executive officerSystem of the Boardjn 1669, I had a number of immediate goals. Some
Paramount had to he discarded over night. Others, I recognized, might takeyears, even decades, to implement. But the quest fOr a budgetingsystem, producing minimum frustration, while protecting taxpayerinterests, and giving life to the educational community, remained
Paramount.
Despite continued internal criticisms, we have come some distancetoward that goal. But there is no pot of gold visible beyond the rain-
bow. I would he the last to claim complete success. Anyone who
94.1
3
41.
Regents have found no pot of goldvisible beyond the budget rainbow.
ti
has ever speht 20 or 60 day's hefore,a'legislative co' 1`tee, defend-ink budget recommendations, comes to know that there is no'magicbudget'ary, system. The Magic, if any, lies inliard work, understan zing of the differences that make universities and colleges sp
'places, and sound judgment,heyond any computerized priritouGoal to As I 'assumed the cOmmasionership six years ago, one goal was
Establish develop and utilize, from elemental institutional materials, a dDataBase base that would not require constant hafraasment of the itistituxins.
My experience as a university president ,had long since demqnstratedthat too much- time, the mosevaludble institutional resource, can bewasted when many parties constantly ask for data generally availablein official reports. A data base is difficult to develop. It requires 'institutional competence and their full cooperation. With-..ihe helpof nationally-aicepted accounting kuidelines, we have hiclIo -ringas many data elementsinto comparability as possible.
After..six years, and With ,excellent cooperation from the institu-tions, data comparability is moving- toward fact rather than goal inseveral areas. lkit it must be realized that, in the-end, budgeting isa judgmental, not a mechanical or formula process, particularlygiven, the diversity of our nine institutions. The aspirations ,Of theEnglish Department at Dixie College may resemble the as/Pirationsof the English Department at the University of Utah, but they arequite different structures, with quite different, but impOrtant, mis-sions in many respects.
AtooluteComparabilityUnachievable
,
Budgeting, too, is an area where we never can 'achieve absolutecomparability. The cost of attempting complete Cartesian compar-
would lead to no true advantage, over the kind of understand-ing and judg'ment needed in higher'ecucation especially the com-.plex university. ,
I am extremely proud,of the enrollment data now generated with--in the System. We can place gYeater. .reliance on the"6gures, andcan use them to derive surprisingly accurate estimates of revenue.
The intentions f high school seniors with respect to their futureplans, space utilization data, salary and bUdget informatiOn,ing maintenance coats, also are collected and diffused in an orderlymanner. The annual reports of the, Utah State* Board of Regents,to the Governor and Legislature are recognized outside of Utah asthe best and most complete of any at_atewide system.
-` Institutions are often pressed to produce data they really haven'tthe manpower to generate. The ability of the human mind to ask
.4
question.1 is almost infinite. It is my feelingkat much additionaldata collection, beyond the Regents' and many in.situtional pult-
lished reports, including audits, is,unitece.s.sary and could be elimi-nated with little loss of objectivity.
"Tailor-make" Because "each institution is different, we use our systems to de-
.,Budget velop a "tailor-made" budget for each institution, just as the indi-
viduaLs of fa family are clothed. We have even used a few "hand-
me-downs."
Despite the progress we have made, the "budget system" comesunder ,attack from those who become impatient, waiting for theirfrustrations to leave. They appear to think that formulas and/orMethods exist which demandofewer'hours than are now invested itailor-making individual institutional budgets from the grounf.I--u)i.
The foreca:hed times of uncertainty in higherxducation gest to
Me the need for an even' more ,flexible system of bu brig, rather
than rigid formulae. Whatever budgeting syst we employ, itshould have the ability, to respond to possible ictuatiohs while pre-serving"the continuity needed for building-educational quality.
A
System budgets must be"tailored" to meet a broad rangeof institutions and needs.
IllaarL11011111014
444.St
'TV
SILI 4
4
LegislativeNeedling
Helps
it
Many systems throughout the nation are now revert* to the, ,tailoring approach, forsaking the quest for formula systems, as Utahdid after enacting an extensive formula statute in 1949. With a solidfoundation under foot, 'I believe we can better invest out time inmeeting specific areas of highest frustration; rather than changingour approach. Our,"tailoring" 'system highlights priorities of need,over and above the minimal "clothing" ultimately provided. -Byexamining priOrities and hearing the institutions, Regents and legis .latort can thçi render judgment.
A great de4J of the credit for any success realized in Utah must- laid atth44t. of the Regents and the Legislature. In performi
their responsibifities, they have given us the "needling," thecouragement, support, and ;criticism for developing policies w ichhave brought us forward.
Thanks to legislative encouragement, the Regents have developedand adopted policies governing, overhead reimbursement, invest-ments, tuition, athletics, and others, not to mention the ttemendobs
'success in regulating and controlling academic prograrris; the on-going summary of which is pOrtrayed in each Annual Report.
One of the gratifying elements of the Utah higher educationbudgeting process is the opportunity given me` as chief executiveofficer to operate without developing a huge bureaucratic staff at
2 56
Legislators give needed "needling"encouragernentAnd support.
the slat I el. The institutions responsibly deN'elop their budgetproposal. They.are closest to where the needs of education ,are feltand c. rienced, and-from which my office, as a statewide office, issom hat removed.
Our internal examinations see-that Regent politics are being ear-ed otit on th -ampiiSes., Compliance Is insured with board and
legisiative-intent. I feel this has been accomplished without becorn7ing ov&- hearing, or interfering with the sensitive environment oflearning.
. 1
A danger I see is that other agencies in) both federal and stategovernment are now proliferating teir contacts with, the institutions.The result, always apparent, is to place'an unwieldy Burden uponthem. Operating costs and bureaticracies mount(to answer uncoor-dinated inquiries. In the end, learning will suffer. Iiarning shouldhe a joyous, thrilling, enterprise, led by men and women who thrilllo the sounds of Mozart, the words of Shakespear'e and the Bible,the marvels of living 'tl-ijngs, and the beautieS of science and mathe-matical, inquiry.. Ther'e comes a time wheVi The cost of regressiveregulation is more burdensome than. even a Skills Center can stand.The last few years have indicated to me a trend in this direction.1 hope future cooperative efforts can thwart this trend, as I have
resisted filling my office with okelkzealous functionaries.
The Utah Board of Regents was created in 1969 to function and
serve as the respon ,{hle goverrav body for p tsecondarylitlucationin Utah out-standing citizens appointed by the Governor, -nd confirmed by the
.' I sincerely commend4e devoted e orts of the fifteen out-
Senate, "to afford the people of the State of i,Jtah a more efficient
and more economical system of high quality public higher educa-tion" (Highe/r Education Act of 1969, Section 2
/
-I
7
G. Homer DurhatCommissioner of iihe'r.:Educatiqnand Chief EKccutive4OfficerUtah State Board of Regents
...
o.
A
II. Events of theYear-
1,
;Progress towards systemwide -cooperation marks the events of1974-75.
2t,
The 1974-.75 calendar was faced with planning entries, as theUtah Syte Board of Regents finished its sixth year as Utah's state-
-Wide governing board for higher education, With the assistanceof a'small grant from the Federal Government, the Regents wereable to bring together the planning efforts which have characterizedoperations from the beginning. The planning documents were pub -.lished before the year's end. They contain goals and assumptions tounderpin state planning through the next decade, and an outline forfuture vocational-technical education development.
Program review, budget. making, and capital facilities oversightconstitute 'the general policy governance exercised by the Regentsthroughout the year. A brief outline of some Of the important eventsin this year of progress follows:
In its annual retreat the Regents responded to the 'State'Board ofEducation's call for the transfer of the technical colleges solely to itscharge. The Regents said "... it would be a distinct step backward.The State Board of Regents supports # strengthened, single, unifiedsystem of economical, efficient, post cohdary public education andoppOses the creation of 'two comp titive higher education systems ascontrary to the best interests o ,VUtah students and taxpayers." Inother actions, the Re exits:
Defined Civil, Electrical, and Mechanical Engineering researchroles for the University of Utah and Utah State University.
Adopted revised reporting' requirments and internal controlProcedures for investments In securities by collegks and universitiesin the System. .
Approved the general plan for the Utah Technical. College atProvo's new Orem campus.
Amendkd Regerits'. Computer Policy to, further clarify th -
lationship in master planning efforts between the Regents and theState Systems Planning and Computing Steering Board,
Adopted a schedule of capital facilities priorities for transmis-sion'to the State Building Board.
-st- Adopted a systemwide policy to govern credit awarded underCLEP (College Level Examination Program). The policy reaf-firms "the Regents' intention to' accept credit by examination with-out equivalent previous college course work and 'outlines specificguidelines in administering the program: ,
9 ,)0
9
September 11,1974
The Regents set in motion an organization to oversee continuousmaster planning. They defined the scope of- operations underFederal Planning Grant pursuant to section 1203 of the 1972 HigherEducation Act Ainendments. Official business is to he transactedin connection, with Regents' regular monthly. meetings. The
,10...,e5nts also
Designated a planning steering committee and defined its .tasks.
-- Formed a Vocational Technical Continuing Education andCommunity Service Task Force.
Established a State Infdrmation System Technical AdvisoryCommittee to advise and assist the Interinstitutional Committeeon Computer Services.
Describtd reporting requirements_and internal control proce-dures for securities investments in-the System, fulfilling the spi4kof the State Money Management Act.
Respectfully advised the Governor ancl"st: te nancial officersthat the 3 percent reduction in state appropn had worked
great hardship on institutions of higher education. furthercut would compound the -problem 'and imperil the qu f thestate's higher education services.
October 7, Commissioner G. Homer Durham met with a delegation of Utah1974 'County legislators, including §enators Ernest H. Dean and Karl N.
Snow and Representative Stanley A. Leavitt regarding financing ofthe new Orem campus fdr Utah Technical allege at Provo.
October 9,1974
The combined Higher Education and Public Education committeesmet in joint session to discuss legislation regarding governance andthe two technical colleges. The two committees adopted Rroposedlegislation, defining the "General Control and Supervision" functiondictated for the State Board of Education in Article X Section 8 ofthe State Constitution.
; .%, .
October 23, ss A joint Vocational Technical Training Symposium was cosponsored1974 i; by the State Board of Regents and the State Board of Vocational,'
Education. Conferees included representatives from the variou*schools, the staffs of the respective hoards and labor, business and,: .;
industrial leaders. They shared their concerns about the state's post-., -:,,
2J10,
October 28-29,1974
October 30,1974
r.
secondary vocational-technical program with the representatives of,'__toth boards.
G. Homer Durham met with representatives from the participAingschools regarding the Governor's Ethnic Awareness program, whichis administered through the Commissioner's office.
The Regents met with the Presidents of each System institution intwo full days of budget hearings, in prepaea-tion for the submissionof the 1975-76 Legislative Appropriation request.
The Regents during their regular monthly session, designated a studycomMittee to determine the feasibility, practicability and economy ofinstalling remote job terminals to be tied with the Weber Computerand:.
Directed the Office of the Commissioner to determine fromexisting programs those which could be eliminated, cut back, ordiscontinued, resulting/in budgetary savings.
Incorporated the Skills Center Nor h as a permapentpart of, the/ regular vocational-technical p4rogra WeberState College's
School of Tech olou. /
govember 6, The Regents adOpted a $13 budgetAcommendation for1974 1975-76 includi`ng$90.1 in recommended legislitive appropriations;
and
set a policy that work programs will have much higher priorityin Board activities than the revievitif-and ,approval of new pro-grams as there is no money to fund new programs.
Instructed institutions to take existing monies, from whateverprogram or areas, and apply them -for. compliance with the pro-visions of Title IX (nondiscrimination by
November 26, The Regents, pursuant to the statutory previsions regulating the1974 same, discontinued the Associate of Science_ifegreejat Utdh-Tteh--,
nical College at Provo. . n./:___.
Ruled, that no new curricular proposals, o t,her4han emergencies,:,.-
will hereafter be acted/on in the October and. November meeting's.,---
November 27,1974
December 5,1974
December 12,1974
Deceinber 16,1974
Higher Education institutio met with Governor Calvin L. Ramp-ton regarding requests for 1 75-7Q' appropriations as a part of theGovernor's annual budget-ma ing procedures.
Commissioner -G. Homer Durhden R. Eyring met with Rep.Dixie L. Leavitt regarding prSorensen, from the Legislative C
The Commissioner's staff met wimittee on Higher Education, to d.
m and Assistant Commissioner Har-Willard Hale Gardner and Senator
posed computer legislation. Leonuncil staff also was present.
h the Legislative Planning Com-cuss impending legislation for the
-4 .4975 regular legislative session.
The Ile-gents adopted a statement recommending that althoughquotas not be imposed on the numbe of faculty awarded tenure, thepresidents shall deVelop a. rigorous a nual review procedure, filingwith the Commissioner's office a .fiv year plan showing how they
ropose.tO limit the number of facult q,warded tenure; and
'.."Xthe...5tirAnnual Higher Edu tion Assembly to discussand proposed method of finan ing higher education jthe
°ming, year. `InstitutiAnal Council entbers, presidents, students,faculty, and legistatms attended.
3'1
Fifth Higher Education Assemblyfocuses on financing Utah highereducation.
January 9,1975
The Regents niet with new m mbets of the JoirtrApprop_riations_Higher Education Subcommittee. Budget ChairmanRby W. Sim-mons, Commissioner Durham and members of the'Regent staff intro-duced the new legislators to the Regent budget- ng procedures.
January 13, The 1975 Utah Legislature opened its regular session. ernor1975 Calvin L. Rampton delivered his Styite` of the State dre:Ss: -'4.,4---.,
Commissioner's office began eetiiikg-with the Joint Higher Educa-'tion Appropriations Subcommittee on 75-76 Regent recommenda-
.
tions.t
January 16,1975
January 27,1975
iabiUary 7,1975
The Regents adopted with proposed revisions, the procedures of in -'ternal audits program and teporting. A Regent Audit Review.Committee was constituted, The Regents also:
Instructed the Office of the Commissioner to advise the Higher,Education Appropriations Subcommittee, and all sponsors of egis,lation which would affect retirement; that: TIAA-CREF retire-ment .prbgrams, at higher education institutions are not includedin any proposed adjustments under the state retirement plan. The
,,Regents asked that the formula enacted for state employees be
extended to TIAA-CREF participants as well.
Requested cost of living adjustments for higher education classi-,lied gersonnel be equal with comparable state classified employees.
-- Approved a motion favoring proposed bonding legislation, in-cluding approval of $34.9 million for expansion of the Universityof Utah Medical Center. Higher education building items num-
bered 37 through on ,the state Building Board's 1975-76 rec-ommendations and $8 million toward construction of the Orem
campus of Utah Technical College at Provo, were' included. inthe Regent motion.
Accepted the resignation of President Ferron C. Losee, Dixie
College, effective June 30, 1976.
Adopted the recommenclations'of the Commissioner of Higher.Education as po'licy for presidAtial residences in the Utah System
Of Higher Education.
The Regent Executive Committee met with the Commissioner of.Higher Education to discuss legislation before the 1975 Utah Legis-
/alature.
13
32
February 12.1976
"Commissioner G. Homer Durham met With the Utah TechnicalCollege at Salt Li!ke faculty, at their request, to discuss issues ofgovernance of the two Utah Technical Colleges, and other issuesbefore the Utah LegislatUre.
February 21. Commissioner Durham acupted the Utah Technical, College at1975 Provo faculty request for an information meeting similar to the
session held at Utah Technical College /Salt Lake earlier in themonth.
March 3 Utah Technical College at Provo, held woundbreaking 'ceremonies1975 for their new Orern campus. Governor CalAVin L. Rampton turned
the first spade, using a large piece of earth roving equipment. Ite-gent Thomas S.,Monson delivered the prayer, dedicating the site.
iMarch 5. State Senate defeated S.B. 207, Governance of Technical Colleges.
1975 The legislation initiated by the State Board for Vocational Educa-tion attempted to transfer the two technical colleges from the UtahSystent of Higher Education. It failed on a 19 to 8 vote.
March 21.. J. Marvin Higbee was inaugurated,,as Snow College president and1. 975 f v inducted into office b,;/Vice Chairman Charles E. Peterson
a-O ctig foe the Board of Regents.
March 24. 25.1§75
The Regents adopted a system-wide tuition policy establishing stableancVobjective relationships between ,levels of resident tuition chargesat the several institutions: Nonresident tuition increases must be atleast 250 percent of resident increases; and,
Recommended that legislation be enacted to provide emplOyeesunder TIAA-CREF retirement plans'eqeial treatment in matchingfunds with the State Retirement Fund in the 1976-77 budget.
Adopted criteria for defining substantial financial .need of stu-dents, for the Utah Spate Student Incentive Grant Program.
April 1. G. Homer Durham investigated fire damage to the official residence1975 of Weber State College president, Joseph L. Bishop, and advised by
cablegram President Bishop, absent on official business in the Orient,of the safety of his wife and family.
April 21. ffhe State Board of Regents met for lunch with the State Board1975 ror Vocational Education at their invitation., The two Boards aired
views about.their relationship, pledging mutual cooperation.
3314
April 21, 22,1975
,0
May 2,1975
nmk
Th Regents,State Board of Regen, in its regular monthly Meeting directedthe institutionsnstitutions to incorporate in their work programs for fiscal year1975-76, the average classified employee salary increase specified inlegislative intent; and
Directed the institutions to incorporate in their work programsfor fiscal year 1975-76, the average classified employee. salary in-crease specified in legislative intent.
Ruled that in considering work program revisions for fiscal year1974-75, expenditure of increased funds not be approved, unlessthe institution presents detailed information and persuasive justifi-cation for such expenditures, but that funds would be held, in re-serve for programming in fiscal year 1975-76.
Received the prospectus for proposed bonding at Utah Tech-nical College at Provo for a student center, referred it to the At-torney General with a request for his opinion and report by April30, 1975.
Ruled that each proposal for revenue bond financing by aninstitution be submittecl'to the Attorney General, and be submittedto the Regents with a written report from the Office of the Attor-ney General at least two weeks prior to the meeting in which actionis to be taken.
The State Board of Regents welcomed 187 delegates to a StatewideMaster Planning Conference at the Rodeway Inn. The InstitutionalCouncil members, Presidents, faculty, students, and aciminiStatorsshared their views on Regent master planning grafts. The Regentsalso
Approved a schedule adopted by Dixie College Institutional.Council propOsing, tuition increases for resident and nonresidentstudents.
Approved Bookstore pansion bond issue at Univer's ity of Utah.
Approved Student Un n Building bond issues at Utah Tech-nical College at Provo.
ApprOed thecomputer facilities.)
o
ber SpateCollege request for an upgrade in
31
s
fi
May 17, 'Westminster College began its .centennial (1875)- year cerebration.1975
May 19, 20, The Regents approved in principle the -Proposal for Phase II con-14975 struction of the Orem campus, subject to review of the architectural
planning guide when completed. Die fire science and drill towerwas excluded from Phase II; and
Recommended to the State Building Board, to award a con- ,struction contract fof the Utah TeChnicai College at Provo StudentUnion Building project, to be constructed in part with the proceeds,
$1,200,000 Utah Technical College ar Provo Student UnionBu' n Bonds o6:1975; and, to authorize the Commissione f
Higher E and President of Utah Technical CollegeaProvo to so advise the State Building Board:
Approved the revised tenure document of Utah State Uni-versi ty.
June 23, 24, The Regents waived the charging of reimbursed overhead for Title1975 r grants as requirement. That those gr
[antees electing to charge over-
head be limited to only that required to enable them to meet theone-third local matching requirement; and 1" -
Approved prograni descrip tions for grant awards for fiscal year1976 under Title I Of the Hi er Education Act,
.,
'Approved general and spe21 ei recommendations of the RegentsInternal Audit committee and.adfsed the piesidents to so comply.
R4quested the Legislature in conjunction with the 1976-77 bud-,g to appropriitte funds directty to th State Board of Cdpcationto payment of full 'tuition to each of the institutions'of higher edu-cation under the State Board of Education vocational rehabilita-tion program; further, that, beginning in fiscal' year 1976-77, nofurther waivers of tuitions or fees be made by any of the institutionsto vocational rehabilitation students.
Approved the request of the College of Eastern Utah to spendapproximately $10,000 of campus developtnent money- for ireprovements at the National Guard Armory located in Price, Utah,in exchange for property belonging to the National Guard, locatedcontiguous to the college campus.
June 23, The Regents, at their request, met with eighteen members of the1975 Weber State College faculty to hear their concerns regardinkgrac-
316
tices,and fai.uhv relations at NVeher State Colley. Chairman GeorgeC. Hatch in advance of the meeting and in response thereto, advisedChairman Frank Trancis, Jr. of the Weber State College Institu-tional Council, of .the 'Regents' response to the request, t` tat theCouncil might also be informed. Subsequent meetings by the Re-gents and Chairman, Hatch followed with the Council,. PresidentBishop, artrothers in the new fiscal year, which began July 1, 1975.
Utah Technical College at ProvoHolds groundbreaking ceremoniesfor its new Orem campus,
17
3
,
fr
III. Academic Affairs
Q 7
,
A new. vocational-technical planemerges from a year's academicplanning.
Institu,tiondlChoice
Analyzed
CareerLadder
Approach
A working plan for postsecondary, vocational-technical educationin Utah emerged from 1974-75 academic affairs planning, efforts'.
Dr. Leort.R.,IVIcCattey, as.ibc'cate commissioner, led a vocational-' fechnical task force iwhich developed- a plan for a system of indi-vidualized self-paced instruction, tribe implemented during fhe'nextseveral years.
Findings of the task force clearly showed that not all,,Utah stud iswho have thepotential and ability are pursuing postsecondary traing, despite indications' that an increasing number of occupations,will demand such training in the future. Nearly 80. percent of thehigh school juniors. in the state have the necessary abilities to torn-.pete at the postsecondary level. However, only 60 percent actuallypursue such training.
.According to data collected for the report, about 74 percent of
.;
the available and projected job openings in 'Utah require post-secondary training. Most of these jobs; or approximately 56 percentof all present and future job openings, require training in areas "
classified as vocational-technical related.Another assumption upon which the report was based deals with
the students' institutional 'choice. The committee found little datawhich indicate that students select an undergraduate institution orsthe ba.s'isof -a particular 01-ogram. Rather, it appears that studentsfirst selett an institution on the basis of other considerations, and thenselect a training program from. the offerings already available at thatinstitution.
The task force also fOund that the population which is beingmissed by postsecondary programs is The group for which "entry%
programs at the one and two -year' levels could be most bene-.ficial.
Based oir these assumptions 'the task force proposed that Utahhigher education institutions develop vocational program policiesconsistent with open-entrance, open-,exit, individualized, self-pacedinstruction. ( See Figure I ).
The proposed ,educational system would enable a student throughincieased counseling efforts, to locate a career ladder and progresgthrough its competency levels, while stopping in and,,aut of schoolfor wrik pr other experiences to supplement his training. The re-port' also envisages the natural progression from institution to institu-tion within the Utah System, to ta.ke advantage. of the' unique role
-assignments and missions of these various schools. The paradigm;
(Figure'l) describes the need for several key elements in the'system:a coordinated admission policy; in-depth counseling; flexible sched-
19
3 ,;
FutureDemandsDemaridsFlexibility
.uling; and facility advisors, who would 'assist the students in making'smooth transitions between educational and work experiences.
One of the key assumptions in the master plan is, that duringindividual's lifetime, he may find it necessary to change occupationaltracks and return to school; either to update his training, or to chan-nel,it in a different direction. The flexible system described in theTask Force report would enable a student to make that transitionas often as necessary, while receiving appropyiate credit, both forwork experiences and previous study. Copied of the report and more(in-depth) information on program implementation are availablethrough the Office of the CommissiOner of Higher Education.
'''T'he,following is a summary of Regent actions as well as studiesnow in progress in the Office of the Commissioner, regarding insti-tutional roles and program approval responsibilities. Reports from,Swewide Educational Television, Veterans ApprOYal, and WesternInterstate Compact on Higher Eddration also are included.
t
Figure 1 . A Flexible SystemWith an "Open Door" PolicyThrough in -depth counseling, student0 are placed gOducationallevels recognizing competenty. The academic program -Is builtaround core curricula which cluster courses basic to many 1 iefdsWhen 'students choose occupatior(al specialtieS. they leave coresubjects for more specialized training. Flexible scheduling enablesstudents to tildbe themselyes. They can easily alternate periods ofstudy a'rid work. Usual classes begin at intervals more frequent thanupual quarter or semester structures. Faculty advisqe help studentsfind work opportunities and see they receive appropriate credit forwork experience. J"
COMPETENCY'LEVELS
WORKLEVELS
AdditionalAids;St Services
3920
Studies inPlogress s
Proposed19ogramsApproved
Role and Curricular StudiesJuly 1, 1974 through June 30, 19751974,75
.1. Women's Resource Center', University of Utah.2. ast t. of Statistics in (Selected' Disciplines), University of
3. Coordi'nation of par professional programs in Social. )York,University of Utah.
4. Department of Indust 'al Technology,' UtaheState University.
5. Educational Specialist greeInstructional Media, Utah StateUniversity.
6. Technician's certificate 'n Emergency Medical (0.E. Code07.0907), Weber State liege.
kvParamedic certificate (O. . Code 07,;0907), Weber State Col-lege.
8. Interdepartrftental minor Latin 'American Studies, WeberState College.
9, Teaching minor in RecreatiOn Education, Weber State College.
,10. Certification in Applied Textiles (O.E. Code 17.3399), DixieCollege.
11. Child Development Major, Southern Utah State College.
1..12. Associate of Applied Scienc degree and certificate; LegalAssistant, Utah ,Technical Coll ;e /Provo.
11 Continuing Education/Commu ity Service master planning re-port, Utah System of Higher Ed cation.
1. Reading minor, Southern -Utah tate College ( July, 1974)
. 2. Sub-baccalauredte program, 'Dal Technolog,y (0.E. Code,01.0101), Utah State University( uly, 1974)'
3. One-year certificate two-year di oma, Associate of AppliedScience degree, Food Setyices (O. . Codes 04.07 and 17.29)Utah Technical College/Salt Lake September', 1974)
4, Certificate of completion, Distributi e Education G-vieral Met.-chandis.e (O.E. Code 04.08) Ut h Slate ,University (0c-tobet,aI9,4)
5, . Master of Science degree, Communitj( Medicine, University ofUtah (November, 1974)
Many of these studies will have been completed neaefion taken before thisreport is published.
21
40
'6. One-year certificate,',two-year Diploma, and Associate Of Ap-plied Science degree, Transportation .Management '('O.E. Code04.19), Utah Teelinical College/Salt Lake (December, 1974)
7. Emphasis, Gerontology, 4rid ReaffirmatiOn of Approval, Rock}Mountain Gerontology Center, University of Utah 4 January1975) . .. I %
. _
8. Teaching 'minor, Physical Education ill the Elementary School,..,.Wel:ex State College ( January 1975) . .
` 9. Associate" of Applied Science deuce, Operating Engineers,Ap-prentice' (0.E. Code 17.1003), Utah. Technical College/Provo(February, 1975) -.1 '
!-`,.. .0. Associate of Applied Science` degree, Operating Engineers Ap-
prentice (0,E. Code L7.1003) Utah Technical college/ Salt ''Lake (February, 1%9,75) - ..
'..;..11. Doctor of Pharmacy; University of Utah" (May, 1975) .:
12. Bachelor of Science degree; General -Studies, Weber State Col,.lege (May, 1975) '''' -- - , e
13: One-year'centificate, rie-apprenticeship Program in Operating '
Heavy ' Equipment (O.E., Code 17.1003) approved as pilotProject, subject:to ( 1 )' Federal funding for the Pfirst two yearsand (2) fiirther Board review .,following cessation of Federal,:funding.
''UtahUta Technical College /Provo (June, 19751h
14. Master of Science degree, Materials -Science Sr. Engineering,,
University of Utah (June, 1979) .
Programs, .Disapproved'.
or,Diseontinued
`47
, v. Master of Science -'and Master of Engineering Science cegrees,
Industrial Engineering, discontinued at University' of Utah(JulY;1974) .:', ,
.,..2. All Post-master's degree certification and graduate- degree ;pro-,grams in Instructional MediaWhether independent -Or as part ofeducational administration 'or other dirrkulum areas discon-.'drilled at 'University of :Utah ( July, 1974) , .
3, AssOciate of Science, Certificate of Completion, and Diploma,Early 0' ildh. ducation °(0.E. Code 09.0201), denied atSnow C liege (Oc ober, 1974,) .
4. Associaft of Scie ce, Certificate of Completion, and Diploma,Early COrildhood- Edu.cation (O.E. Code 09.Q201), denied, atCollege of Eastern Utah (October, 1974)
5. AsS'ociate of science degree discontinued at,...Utah TechnicalCollege/Provo (November, 1974)
41,22
P
6'. Bachelor' of Science 'degree, Applied Mathematics, denied atWeber State College (November, 1974)
7. Discontinuance 9f baccalaureate degree, Industrial TechnologyElectronics Option at Southern Utah State College (January,1975)
8. Bachelor of Science degree, Social Work denied at Weber Stat(College (.May, 1975)
Role Exclusive Role at Ph.D. level in Computer Science asgigned toAssignments University of Utah ( July, 1974)
2. Primary Research roles for Civil, Electrical, and MechanicalEngineering assigned University of Utah and Utah State Uni:versity, to avoid duplication in engineering programs and re-search efforts.
3.. Exclusive role for post-master's degive in Instructional Media atthe six -year specialist and doctoral levels Utah- State. TTni-
yersity ( July, 1974) 44. University of Utah to maintain a role at the undergraduate and
master's level in Instructional Media as 'support to its generaluniversity and teacher education programs.
5. Associate of Applied,Science egree to be the only associate de-gree offered at Utah Technical- lege/Provo and Utah Tech-nical ,College/Salt Lake'( November, 74 )5
Changes 1.. Interdisciplinary Division of Process Engineering & Materials,in Academic to ,include Departnients of Chemkal Engineering, Materials
Programa Science & Engineering, and Metallurgical &, Fuels Engineering
University of Utah ( July, 1974) .
2. Separation of Department of Mining, `Metallurgy, and FuelsEngineering into two departinents Department of , Metal-lurgical and Fuels Engineering and Department of Mining En-gineering University of Utah (July, 1974) with the under -
standing' that expanded options within the B.S., M.S., aridPh.D. degree programs in mining engineerin should not be de-yveloped unless, existing, program options a e discontinued orstudent enrollments, increase draniatically..
, 3. Creation of Department of Materials Science & Engineeringfrom division of Materials' Science and Engineering, (the bac-calaureate degree,program to be continued only, if a common
core curriculum can be developed within the Division of ProcessEngineering and Materials; the doctoral program in MaterialsScience and, Engineering should continue to be administered bythe Interdisciplinary Material; Committee) = ( July, 1974)
4, Creation of the Department of 'Computer Science fr'om Divisionof computer Science, University of Utah (July, 1974)
5. Location of Department of BiophysiCs in College of Medicine,University of Utah ( July, 1974)
6. Creation of Depaitment of Anesthesiology from Division ofAnesthesiology, UniYersity of Utah ( July, 1974Y
7. Name change Department of Community and Family Medi-cine to Department of Family and COriuriuniey "MedicineUniversity of Utah July, 1974)
8. Continuation of welding program as an option of the baccalau-reate program in Industrial Technology for next four yearsProbationary Status-,Utah State eni,. eisity (September, 1974)
9. Location of Department of Bioengineen in C011ege of Engi-neering, University of Utah (September, 197
10; Graduate courses in the Diyision of. Piocess EnglKering and.,Materials, to develop and utilize common courses for these disci-
, plinks, University of Utah ( July, 1974.) -110).Jtalf Technical College/Salt Lake and Utah Technical Col-
lege/Provo to clear,ly indicate their respective catalogs those'courses that are transferable to four-year industrial and engineer-ing technology programs; while continuing to`ernphasize that theprimary mission of the vocational=technical programs at theseinstitutions is "job-entry." They should specifically list the typesof tour-year programs to which graduates from the vocationallyoriented two-year programs can transfer, location of the four-year programs, and the courses that will transfer at face value.( January, 1975)
12. University of Utah, Dep4rtment of Educational Systems andLearning Resources (ESLR) approved, ( January, 1975) ; re-stricted from offering course work or degrees beyond the ap-proved Master of Education.
13. Reinstatement of baccalaureate degree in AgricultUral and Irri-gation Engineering, Utah State University (May, 1975)
The Utah State Board of Regents reaffirmed its policy to acceptvalid, the concept of credit by examination without equivalent
us college course work. ( July 1974)
24
Because of the4variety of testing programs, the domain ofindividual departments and of 'general education, and the needfor appropriate articulation agreements among institutions of thestate, the following specific policies were adopted :
I. Examinatipns which replace specific course workA. Departmentally devised examinations
Each department should determine which of its offer-ings may he challenged" by examination; and shouldconstruct, administer, and evaluate appropriate exami-
..
nations upon the request of students.B. Standardized examinations from sources outside the
state System.CLEP Subject examinations are currently available.These are designed/to be equivalent to specific collegecourses, and as such must be _evaluated by individualdepartments to determine validity, appropriateness,and the level of cutting scores which are acceptable.Other acceptable standardized exams should be in-corporated as they become available and are approvedby the departments concerned.
Individual departments should consult with equivalent'departnients at system institutions to establish consistentand acceptable application of these instruments through-out the state.
II. 'Advanced Placement ExaminationsPolicies for the Nwarding of credit for Advanced Place-ment have been daermined by a statewide committee withrepresentatives of both college and high school personnel.The standards suggested are that scores 42,f 3, 4, or 5 re-ceive 12 hours of credit, and that a scoreof 2 be evaluatedby the department4o determine what, if any, credits shouldhe awarded. A score Of I should receive no credit.
1 Exarhinatioh for Credit in General AreasThe CLEP General Examinations are related to GeneralEducation programs in much the same way.that SubjectExaminations are related to departmental majors. Creditshould be awarded for satisfactory performance in thefollowing CLEP General Examination areas:"A. Biological Science (Sub-score of Hours
Natural Science) 10B. Physical Science '(Sub-score of Natural Science) 10
4 4,25
C. Humanities 10D. Social Sciences History 10 I%E. English 6
Total 46
Satisfactory performance shall be defined as:A score of 450 would allow 3 credit hburs, 475,, would al-low 6 credit hours, and 500 would allow 1'0 credit hours'in the four (4) basic" General Education areas Bio-logical Science, Physical Science,' Humanities, and SocialSciences. A score of go would allow 6 credit hours inEnglish composition,' -A/ student who receives 46 credits on the CLEP GeneralExaminations shall have c tnpleted 46 hours of transfercredits to meet the Gen al Education requirements of theinstitution attended. r
IV. Amount of credit to be allowed:The 46 hour maximum shall be adhered to for credit onthe' CLEP General Examinations, but ho limit shall beplaced on credit earned on departmentally devised orstandardized subject area examinations, except as restrictedby the institution. Db.
2. Institutions toce
bmit quarterly reports reflecting de-emphasisor discontinua of ongoing programs, thus reflecting sourcesof revenue for new programs within the institutions (September1974)
Cooperation with WICHE, 1974-75/The Student Exchange Program administered through the West-
ern Interstate Commission for Higher Education ( WICHE) assistsUtah students in obtaining prcifessional training in dentistry andveterinary medicine. Utah receives students in medicine, physicaltherapy, and forestry, under the interstate compact. Students whoare certified pay the same fees as if they were residents df the re-ceiving state. Past appropriations have proyided for five enteringfreshmen each year in _veterinary medicine and dentistry. However,the J973 and 1974 Legislatures provided fund for 8 entering stu-dents in Veterinary Medicine in recognition of the need in the statefor additional veterinarians. One additional veterinary medicinestudent was funded for one year by a $4,000 emergency contribution
' The sub-scores on two parts of the Physical Science test should be 45, 47, and50, instead of 450, 475,,and 500.
4326
from the Utah -Veterinary Medical Association, making a total of9 entering freshmen'. Them are a limited number of places availableto students because so few colleges offer veterinary medicine in theU.S. Continuing students receive the same assistance provided theymaintain a satisfactory record.
In 1974-75 there were 27 Uta students in the veterinary medicineprogram, 20 in the dentistry pro ram. A total of $188,000'was paidin compact fees for these students, and.$28,000 was paid as Utah'sannual membership fee. The un versity received 38 medical studentsand 10 physical therapy studen s in 1974-75 with compact fees of$190,000 for medicine and $14 400 for physical therapy, In addi-tion, Utah State University is a receiving school in forestry Withthree students, and received support fees of $4,500.
Veterans Approval ProgramTo enable persons who have served with the United States Arrned
Fizzes to further their education, Congress has authorized benefitsfor veterans and other, eligible persons attending an approved school.The Office of the Commissioner serves as the Utah State ApprovingAgency, administering the program under contract with the Vet-eran's Administration.
During 1974-75 a greater number of students enrolled in eligibleinstitutions wider the "G,I. Bill," than during any other period of itshistory. The Veterans Administration estimates that nationally,more than 100,000 persons were enrolled for training.
TRe lafge numbers presented a difficult administrative task. TheVeterans' Administi:ation, its approving agencies, and theinstitutionsoffering classes were hard pressed during the year, to carefully re-view both individuals and programs to monitor compliance with
Federal law...9"IYuring 1974=75, Utah institutions were serving eligible persons
under Title 38, Chapters 34-36, United States Code. These includeinstitutions in the Utah System of Higher Education, private uni-versities and colleges, secondary schools, medical-related training
cosinetologlf and barber schools and trade and technicalschools. Together these institutions offer a broad range of academicand vocational training programs, suited to the veteran and civilian
alike. In Utah the following institutions have been approved toserve Veterans:
STATE UNIVERSITIES AND COLLEGES:University of. Utah,. Salt Lake CityUtah State University, LoganWeber State College, Ogden
4 327
Southern Utah State College, Cedar CitySnow College, Ephi^aimoDixie College, St. GeorgeCollege of Eastern Utah, PriceUtah Technical Colleges, Salt Lake and Prow
PRIVATE UNIVERSITIES AND COLLEGES:Brigham Young University, Provo.L.D.S. Business College, Salt LakeStevens-Henager College, OgdenWestminster College, Salt Lake
AVIATION SCHOOLS:Basin Flyin? Service, VernalBy-Rite Aviation Services, OgdenCentral Utah Aviation, ProvoHeber Valley Flying Service, Heber CityIntetivest Aviation, Inc. "
,OgdenoProvoSalt Lake City
Thompson Flying Service, Salt LakeTransWest Flight School, Salt Lake
COSMETOLOGY AND BARBER SCHOOLS:Academy of Barber Sciences, Salt LakeBeau LaReine College of Beauty, LoganContinental College of Beauty, Salt LakeHollywood Beauty Colleges
ClearfieldKearnsLoganMurrayOgdenOremProvoSalt Lake
International Institutes of Hair Design, Bountiful and Salt LakeMary's College of Beauty, Provo .Ogden Beauty College, OgdenPainter's College of Beauty, Ogden and RoyRobert Steur College of Beauty, Salt Laket oilier of Utah, Salt hake
'Utah Executive Schools of Barbering & Men's Hair Styling, Ogden andSalt Lake
MEDICAL AND RELATED TRAINING:The Bryman School, Salt LakeHoly Cross Hospital, Salt LakeL.D.S. Hospital, Salt LakeMcKay-Dee Hospital Center, OgdenS.L.C. College of Medical and Dental Assistants, Salt LakeSt. Mark's Hospital, Salt LakeUniversity Medical Center & Hospital (University of Utah), Salt LakeUtah Medex Project (University Medical Center), Salt LakeUtah State Division of Health, Salt LakeUtah Valley L.D.S. Hospital, Provo
TRADE AND TECHNICAL SCHOOLS:,B.A.R. of Utih, Salt Lake
,Barbizon Models of Utah, Inc., Salt LakeProfessional Violin-Making School of America, Salt LalteRon Bailie/WESTERN SCHOOL OF BROADOAST,Salt Lake
4'728
,
Salt Lake Skills Center, Salt Lake'Skills Center NO-rth, OgdenTechnical Engineering Institute, Salt LakeUtah Peace Officer Standards & Training Academy, Salt LakeVeterans In Community Service, Inc., Salt Lake
ADULT PUBLIC HIGH SCHOOL DIPLOMA & VOCATIONALPROGRAMS:
Alpine School District, American FOrkBox Elderthool District, Brigham CityBridgerlan Area Vocational Center, LoganCarbon County School District, PriceDavis County School District, Farmington 'tDuchesne School District, DuchesneGrand County School District, MoabGranite School District, Salt LakeIron County Schodl District, Cedan CityJordan School District, SandyLogan Scheor District, LoganMoab AreaVocational Center, MoabNebo County School District, Spanish ForkProvo School District, ProvoSalt Lake City School District, Salt LakeSan Juan School District, MonticelloSevier Valley School District, Richfield --Sevier'Valley Tech, RichfieldTooele County School District.-'fooeleUintah Basin Area Vocational Center, RooseveltWashington Couty School District, St. GeorgeWeber County School District, Ogden
Statewide Educational TelevisionNoteworthy developments, in connection with "Utah's single, co-
ordinated statewide system of education television" for 1974-75 in-chickthe following:
.10
Installation and activation of a new transmitter and antenna forKUED at the Mt. Vision site in the Oquirrh mountains west ofSalt Lake City. New equipment replaced 18-year-old installationwhich was obsolete and suffering from lightning damage, corro-sion and difficulty in obtaining replacement parts. New equip-,ment permitted increase of transmitting power to authorized levelresulting in overall improvement in plc the quality and coverage,especially in fringe areas and those corailinities served by trans-lators and CATV cable systems throughout Utah and sevenother states,
2. Completion of studio remodeling and installation of color-capableequipment purchased previous year with federal educationalfacilities grant. Also, acquisition and installation of additionalequipment to render KUED remote pick-up trailer fully opera-tional and capable of on;the-spbt pick-ups of noteworthy actiVitiesand events throughout the state.
4 829
r
a
Ij
3. Participation by KUE 0 and public schools in Utah and adjacentstates in Rocky Mounta Satellite Demonstration Project where-in KUED received prot, ams on career education and other in-school subjects via satelli for distribution to schools.throughoutwestslope area not receivin direct satellite pick-ups.
4. Completion of the first ye r as contribut g member of Corpora-tion for Public Broadcast ng/Public B adcasting Service Pro-gram Cooperative. Coo s, ative is funded by local stations andCPB to-facilitate pooling of funds and other program resourcesfor production of programs for release by member lationson a flexible and selective basis through the CPB financedNational Interconnection Service.
5. Establishment on a normalized basis of "early-bird" schedule onKUED in which entire program series procurred or produced forpublic schools \are "ganged together" for broadcast in a shortperiod of time fop off-the-air recording by the schools. Enablesschools to have their own set of tapes for flexible scheduling atany time rather than waiting to receive progitams as broadcastweek-to-week throughout the school year.
6. Provision for augmented offerings of continuing education pro-grams enabling viewers to obtain college credit for their partici-pation. Broadcasts over past several years include offerings inhistory, geography, engineering, philosophy, English, sociology,:
4 30
.Continuing education offeringi areexpanded to enable college credit tomore Utahns.
anthropology, management and finance, mathematics, music,biology, physics, reading and teacher education. Also, non-creditcourses in hunter survival, hunter safety, cooking, auto mechanics,guitar playing and sewing.
.7. Participation in unique new "program utilization" project inwhich KUEI) promoted in connection with CPB's "FeelingGood" series, some "Feeling Good Clinics" which providedviewers free screening hy local volunteer health professionals' forglaucoma, cancer and higlA)lood pressure..
8. Videotaping of the stage perfOrmance of Ballet West's Universityof Utah performance of "Nutcracker" for release on PBS as oneof network's Christmas specials for 1975. Used unique new multi -camera pick-up and editing techniques which overcome mostproblems#of so called "procenium uch" television. Also recordedMormon Youth Sywhony and phorus "Ractimaninoff Festival"ifi Salt Lake Tabernacle for lee on entire CPB network. Festi-
twat scheduled for repeat during current season as result of requestsfrom all ov.er the nation and Canada.
9. Addition of a new translator on mouutain peak near Coalville toprovide improved service 1.6 vieweiTin Summit County corp-munities. Brings to 26 tae number of "backbOne" translatdrs,owned and operated by the state to provide equality of access tosystem television offerings to citizens throughout the state. ik
State of Utah Educational Television (t,",;'`""!'7,°,"`,,,SI /AI ..1171 01/(0 C
110 or In. Ix Immteter
CHANNEL 7
...,
Ioic , "" -, ' ', "`" ." '' 1
6,,,.11,11,
I
New Coalville translator expandsKUED Jeach into Summit Countycommtrnities.
J031'
'r.
Degrees ConferredFormal degrees and ccrtific, tcs conferred during the course of a
year provide but one measure of higher education's impact'on theState. Significant in 1974-75 was that more formal awards andrecognition were granted than during any ,other' year in Utah'shistory, (See Figure 2)
The number of bachelor's end other proiessional and adva9ceddegrees awarded actually decreased from the previous year. But thestate's emphasis on vocational-technical training ,began to bear fruit,
'yielding 427 additional -degrees and cfttificates, more than enoughto replace the slight decrease in the more-than-four-year categories.
In addition to the formal degrees and certificates, thousands ofUtah citizens found their ways onto the campus for the-workshops,refresher courses and occupaitonal related instruction not aimedtoward iapdegree, or certificate. These courses may last from a dayto many weeks. They constitute an important aspect of higher edu-cation study not reflFcted in any accounting of degree or formalrecognition.
The following tables detail degree, certificate., and other formalrecognition awarded for completed work in. Utah public and privateinstitutions:
Utah System institutions offer abroad. curriculum to accommodatemost post-secondary needs
'TN
F1
5132
Total
9,
Figure 2. Utah Degrees and CertcatesConferred 1967:68 to 1974-75
Private
Public
11,826
f:40,-t,
'12,200
13,332
14,168
15,551 15,42415,141
15,579
1967.68 1968-69 1969-70 1970.71 1971-72 1972.73 1973.74 1974.75
Degrees. Certificates and Other Forrriel RecognitionConferred, Public and Private Institutions, 1967.68 through' 1974.75
Source HEGIS Report, 1967 68 to 1974 75
5233
I
Tables
5334
Utah's institutions awarded greateltnumber of \degrees ,ever
TABLE I Total Degrees Awarded, Public Private Institutions, 1966--67 Through 1974-75.With Percentage Changes From Previous Years. p. 36
TABLE 2 Comparison of Degrees Conferred, 196647 to 1 74-75, Utah Public and PrivateInstitutions By Level of Degree and Area of Study, p.,38
TABLE 3 Bachelor Degrees Conferred, Utah Public and Pri ate Institutions,4 965-66 Through1974-75, By Institution. p. 39
14ABLE 4 Bachelor Degrees Conferred, 1970-71 Through 1 74-75 By Utah Public and PrivateInstitutions and Area of Study. p. 40 .
TABLE 5 Total Bachelor's Degree Awarded 1974-75 By ajor Field' Of Study and Sex. p. 42'
TABLE 6 Total Yearly Bachelor Degrees Conferred, U ah Public and Private ,'restitutions,1965-66 Through 1974-75, By Area of Study. p. 43
TABLE 7 Total Bachelor's Degrees Awarded 1974-75 4 Major Field of Study and Sex. p. 44
TABLE 8 Master's Degrees/Conferred, Utah Public and,Primate Institutions, 1965-66 Through1973-74, By Institution. p. 51
TABLE 9 Total Yearly Master's Degrees Conferred, Utah Public and Pri'vate Institutions,1965-66 Through 1974-75, By Area'of Study, p. 52
TABLE 10 Master's Degrees, tah Public and Privateytnstitutions, 1970-71 Thkpugh 1974-75By Area of Study, p...54
TABLE 14 Doctoratks ( Including J.D.s and M.D.$). Cdnferred,Ut,ah Public and Private Insti-.tutions, 1965-66 Through 1974-75, By Institution, p.
TABLE 12 Doctorates Ounferred, Utah Public and Private InStitutions, 1970,71 Through 1974-75 By Area of Study. p. 56 .
: TABLE 13 Master's and Doctor's Degrees Conferred 1973-74 By Sex of Student and GeneralArea ofStudy, p. 57.
TABLE 14 First Pfofessional Degrees Conferred by Sex and Field of Study At The Univers17)of Utah 1970-71 Through 1974-75, p. 58
TABLE 15 Total Yearly Doctorates Conferred, Utah Public and Private Institutions, 196546Through 4974-75, By Area,of Study. p. 60
TABLE 16 Total Master's and Doctor's Degrees Awarded 1974-75 By Major Field of Study andSex. p. 61
TABLE 17 Degrees and Awards Based on Less Than Four Years of Work Beyond High'SchoolBy Institution, 1974-75: p. 68
TABLE 18 Associate Degrees Conferred, Utah Public and Private Institutions, 1966-67 Through1974-75, By Institution. p. 69
TABLE 19 Degrees and Awards 13ased on Less Than Pour Years of Work Beyond High SchoolCurriculums of Two or More But Less Than Four Years Work Wholly or
Chiefly.Creditable Toward a Bachelor's Degree, 1974-75, p. 70
TABLE 20 Degrees and Awards_Based on Less Than Four Years'of Work Beyond High SchoolCurriculums of Two or More But Less Than Four Years Work Not Wholly og
Chiefly Creditable Toward a Bachelor's Degree, 1974-75. p. 74
TABLE 21 ,Awards Based on Less Than Four Years of Work Beyond High School Curricu-hints of At Least One Year, But Less Than Four Years, 1974-75. p, 78
TABLE 22 Formal Recognition for Short-Course Completions of Less Than One Year's Dura-tion Public and Private Institutions 1974-75: p. 80
TABLE 23 Number of Teachers Recommended for Certification Classified by Level and Institn-titm, 1965 Through 1975. p. 83
TABLE 44 Number of Elementary and Secondary Teachers Who Graduated from Colleges AndUniversities in Utah and Who Accepted Teaching positions in Utah, 1972-73 and1973-74. p. fl5 .!
TABLE 25 Number of Students Graduating from Utah Institutions of Higher Education InElementary and Secondary, ,Education and Percent Accepting Teaching Positions inUtah, 1959-60 Through 1974-75. p. 85
535
r;11
TABLE 1
Utah Systems)f Higher Education° TotaloDegteei Avvataod°, Publfic mid Private Institutions,
1966-67 Through.1974-75, With Percentage Chcinges From Previous Years
1966-67 1467-68 1968-69 1969-70
Percent Percent._ Percent
't Increctse Increase Increase '".. " I,-' Over -
. Over . Over..
Level of Degree " 'N0,--., No. f966-67 No.°. Bachelor's Detgrees --,' , t. r.
. PLIblic Institutions - .3,917 4,128 5.4% '4,444Private Irstitutiorls * 2,947 3'1344-, 4 '13.5 3,411
To/41 6;864 .."- .7,474 8.9 8,057Master's Degrees - . II
0 Public *InsiitUtians . I 924 ' 912 ,-1.3 - 44.094'privOte instit'ution's` -; 142B .536,k 25.2 64646
-
TOtill 1,352. 1,448 7.1 1,742'First Prolessiorkl 1.25' -...* 149 . 11.2 131....._:_......_' , i,..____.
Doctor'44egte'es '. 'o- .,,.- 1" ',
Public Institutions 19'4 201','t -o 3.6 . '267Privgte Institutions '25' 46 . -- 40070 .,.4,8 '
Total ' (> .4. 217. /47 ,'16-.5 ' Di5Total Degrees
. ,,,,
Institutions 5,160 .5,,q80 : ClZ*1,3,'0, 5,9150v.4,,Ztottlnstitutions 3,398 - 3,924 15,5 ^ '4,4,05,. .. Total," ' ' , 8,554, 9131,38 7 813:YO .10,265-
1967-68 ." No. 1968.64 4°',
. -, 7.7% 4,913 .10.5% 5,120
-7.9,. 3,924.....-...
8.7 4,267
7.8 8,837; . .1 9.7. 9,00.. ;,,,,f . ,
20.2 1,202 9,7 1,312A
20,5., 626 3.1. 704
* .26.3 1,828, 4.9 , 2,016' 8.6 153, 1,3 . 41 . - 166:
, 12,8 349, 30.7 317it,44-.3 , '. . 64 33.3 77
.' _27.5- 413 3it1 . 394
1078 ' 6,617 11.0 '6,9159.7 4,614 7,2 5,048
'-' 10.3%°... 11,231 . 9.4% A 1;963,...
I .TolaDigtees Awarded .ThroOghpuiU.S.d .:. 773,375- '811,842-"*" I 2.7.%- 90,186. 13,4%1,072,581 $.3% 1,440,292*
4..-Percent Tof .4, 7'oiUTS. . i
,.1.04% 4.05% ,
From Utah Schools ' d..11% 1.07%,^ 1.05%.,--4- : ...`F---,--- ---,
: . .
°D es.oes not inclinclude Associate ctegrev
-,*.F-7,'''''-';'-''
, .. .
b Includes, beginning will*the.19i1-72 ',4cacleTic year Master ..,cif Philosophy degrees, which are theequivalent of doctOral.clegrees nitliout dissertations, awarded by the (t)n i v te r s i ty of Utah..
1,
'Includes, begiraning with the 1'974-75°' academic year,-Six-year CertlfiCates: awarded by Brigham Young°,, -`University. 1,
^
° ciMery f vans41*-1ooper and MCirjorie .0: Cho nqlef', Tarpecf Clpr'ee's Conferred.' 1967,68, Part A Sum-..
mary Data, 1.4,S., Department ot.1-reaTh, Education,..Ad Welfare, Of fice' of Education (Washington, D.C.;,Governlment Printing Office*, May, 1969), p.*3. .
iv
1970-71 1971-72 1972,73 1973-74 . 1974 -75.
.Percent ,Imolai*
Over1969-70 No.-
P rcent ' .Increase
Over1970-71 No.
-PercentIncrease
Over1971-72 No.
Percent s
IncreaseOver
1'972-73 No.
4.2% 5,134 .3% 5,031 -2.0% 5,248 4.3* 4;913 ,
8.7 4,461 4.5 4,249 -4.8 4,2218 .0 . 4,241
'6.5 9,595 2.2 9,280 -3.3 -4'9,496 " 2.3 9,154
..
9.2 1,407 7.2 1,423 1,1 1,654 16.2 1,424
12.5 761 8.1 746 720 -3.5_ 846
10.3 2,168 7.5 2,169 0.0 ` 2,374 9.5 2,270
8.5 179 7.8 ' 227 26.8 198 -12.8 233
,
-9.2 186 21.8 352 -8,8 1. 356 1.1-
'321
105 36.4 '108 2.9 86 -20,3 160
-4.6 491 24.6 460 . 442 -3.9 481
4.5 7,106 2,8 , 7,033 -1.0 7,456 6.0 " 6,S191
9.4 5,327 5.5 5,103 -4.2 5,054 5,247
6.5% 12,433 3.9%v 12,136 -2.4% 12,610 .3.1% 12,138
6.3% 1,192,000 4.5% 1,277,000 7.1%1,313,200' 2.8% 1,343,400}
1.04% .95* .95% .90%
11
Percent"Percent of Total.Increase Wpm*.
Over Awarded3973.74 19744.5
1
-6.4% . 40.5%-0.2 34.9
-3.6 75.4
-33.9 11.7
17v5 7.0
,- -4.4 18.7
17.7 ).9
-9.8 2.76.1 .
8.8 4.0
-7.63.8 43.2
-3.0% 100.0%
2.3%
Martin M'. Fro'nkel ond J. Fred Beomer, Projections of Educotionol Stotisticg to 198?-83: 1973 Edifier!,
U.S., Deportment of Heolth, Educotion, ond tNelf ore, Office" of Educotion, DHE* Publicotion No. (OE)74-11105 (Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office, 1.974), p. 46.;
4Kenneth A. Simon ond Martin M. Fronk', Projections of Educotionol 8totistics to 1983.84:1974 Edition,
U.S., Deportment of Heolth, Educotion, ond Welfore, Educotion Division, Notional Center for Educaticin
Statistics Publication No. 75-209 (Woshington; D.C.: Government Printing Office, 1975); p. .
ScUres: Institutional reports to Utah Coordinating Counfiil of Higher Educoti:n, 1966-67.
HEGIS Reports, 1967-68 through 1974-75.
44°
V
5;37°
oT
AB
LE 2
Uta
h S
yste
m o
f Hig
her
Edu
catio
n
Com
paris
on o
f Deg
rees
Con
ferr
ed, 1
965-
66 to
197
445
Uta
h P
ublic
and
Priv
ate
Ins,
by
Leve
l of D
egre
e an
d ki
wi o
f Stu
dy
Are
a of
Stu
dy,
Bac
helo
r's D
egre
es'
196
:5 -
1974
-%
6675
-In
crea
se
Mas
tok'
sirg
rees
1965
-19
74-
%66
75In
Cre
ctie
Doc
tor's
Deg
rees
1965
-19
74-
%66
75In
crea
se
iota
, Deg
rees
1965
-19
74-
%66
75In
crea
se
Agr
ici;I
ture
& N
atur
al R
esou
rces
87' ...
5 33
228
1.6%
26'
4365
.4%
1112
9.1%
124
387
212.
1%A
rchi
tect
ure&
Env
ironm
enta
f Des
ign
13
361
6540
0.0
14:
100.
045
1:r
26.3
48
2710
0.0
643
00.0
56''''
16.
7
- - 15
--
--
3916
0.0
13 -42
4
92-
607.
720
100.
055
130
.0
Are
a S
tudi
es.._
,B
iolo
gica
l Sci
ence
s,
Bus
ines
s &
Man
agem
ent
,,,80
9.1,
253
54:9
242
100.
015
8 -54
424
4.3
.12
100.
01 -
v650
0.0
110
0.0
968 -
1,80
386
.325
510
0.0
Com
mun
icat
ions
. Com
pute
r &
Info
rmot
iona
l Sci
ence
s--
----
r,23
010
9,10
0.0
-11
100.
0-
410
0.0
-12
410
0.0
Edu
catio
n1,
580
28.5
355
648°
82.5
4420
436
3.6
1,62
92,
432
49.3
Eng
inee
ring
-35
755
455
.212
022
1 b
84.2
1642
162.
549
381
765
.7E
nglis
h &
Jour
nalis
m36
2-
-100
.041
- -1
00.0
3-
-100
.040
6-
-100
.0F
ined
App
lied
Art
s31
820
940
226
.469
28.7
,± 7
715
65-1
5.6
5627
3.36
..4 2
1015
0.0
5,
150.
039
922
6' 4
7719
.533
046
.0F
orei
gn L
angu
ages
For
estr
y81
- -1
00.0
9-,
-10
0.0
4-
-100
,094
- -1
00.0
Geo
grap
hy-
- -1
00.0
3-
-100
.0-
--
33-
-100
.0H
ealth
Pro
fess
ions
12
411
170.
413
5733
8.5
46`
99°
115.
221
156
716
8.7
Hom
e E
cono
mic
s35
657
762
.125
5512
0.0
26
200.
038
363
8'66
.6La
w-
--
--
--
5813
6"13
4.5
5813
613
4.5
Lette
rs-
.48
910
0.0
7210
0.0
-13
100.
057
410
0.0
Libr
ary
Sci
ente
--
-26
100.
0-
2610
0.0
-52
100.
0M
athe
mat
ics
'12
911
4-1
1.6
1935
84.2
119
-18.
215
915
8-.
6M
ilita
ry S
cien
ces
7' -
-10
0.0
--
--
--
7-
-100
.0 -
Phi
loso
phy
19-
-100
.0 e
2-
-100
.0-
-100
.023
- -1
00.0
Phy
sica
l Sci
ence
s18
426
4'43
.541
-52
26.8
.44
41,,,
=6.
8'
269
357
32.7
Psy
chol
ogy
!96.
430
119.
4 /
2930
3.4
1334
'.16
1.5
238
494
107.
6P
ublic
Affa
irs &
Sep
ik S
4623
2'40
4.3
6715
012
3.9
6 .
100.
011
338
824
3.4
Soc
ial S
cien
c95
91,
078
12.4
8489
6.0
720
.185
.71;
050
131,
187
13.0
147.
7T
heol
ogy
--
-11
'13
"
18.2
2'1
7=50
.0T
iode
& In
dust
rial
56--
:-10
0.0
--
--
56-
-100
.0In
terd
isci
plin
ary
21
5,98
228
31,
247.
69,
154
53.0
%. -
' 1,1
432
100.
02,
270
98.6
%-
285
--
714
150.
5%21
7,41
0. 2
851,
257.
112
,132
63.,8
%T
OT
AL
°Inc
lude
s 1
six-
year
Cer
tific
ate
awar
ded
in P
ublic
Sch
ool A
dmin
istr
atio
nby
8rig
ham
You
ng U
nive
rsity
.'In
clud
es 1
Mas
ter
of P
hilo
soph
y de
gree
in E
lect
rical
Eng
inee
ring,
equ
ival
ent t
odo
ctor
al d
egre
e w
ithou
t dis
sert
atio
n, U
of U
.R
epre
sent
s LL
B. f
irst p
rofe
ssio
nal d
egre
es a
t the
doc
tora
l lev
el a
war
ded
by th
e U
nive
rsity
of U
tah.
Incl
udes
44
M. D
. firs
t pro
fess
iona
l deg
rees
at U
of U
.'R
epre
sent
s J.
D. f
irst p
rofe
ssio
nal d
egre
es a
t the
doc
tora
l lev
el a
war
ded
by th
eUni
vers
ity o
f Uta
h.d
Incl
udes
97
M. D
. firs
t pro
fess
iona
lde
gree
s at
U o
f Lk
gInd
udes
1 s
ix-y
ear
Cer
tific
ate
awar
ded
in E
nglis
h as
a S
econ
d, L
angu
age
by B
righa
mY
oung
Uni
vers
ity.
Sou
rces
: Ins
titut
iona
l rep
orts
to U
toh
Coo
rdin
atin
g C
ounc
il of
Hig
her
Edu
catio
n, 1
965=
66.
HE
GIS
Rep
orts
, 197
4-75
.
TA
BLE
3
Uta
h S
yste
m o
f Hig
her
Edu
catio
n
Bac
frlo
rDeg
rees
Con
ferr
ed, U
tah
Pub
lic a
nd P
rivat
e In
stitu
tions
;19
45-6
6 T
hrou
gh 1
974-
75 b
yIn
stitu
tion
0
Inst
ititti
en19
65-8
619
66-6
7 19
67-6
819
68-6
9 19
69-7
019
70 -
7119
71-7
219
72-7
3'19
73-7
419
74-7
5
Ten
-Y
ear
Tot
al
%In
c19
74-7
5O
ver
1965
.66
Sys
tem
Inst
itutio
ns:
Uni
vers
ity o
f Uta
h1,
762
1,86
11,
981
2,12
8=
2,31
22,
409
2,42
72,
481
2,66
12,
491
22,5
1341
.4%
Uta
h S
tate
Uni
vers
ity1,
196
1,34
01,
349
1,36
6'.
1,48
11,
521°
1,57
31,
450
1,45
01,
386
14,1
1215
.9
,Web
er S
tate
Col
lege
432
560
626,
752
864
907
851
794
846
781
7,41
380
.8
Sou
ther
n U
tah
Sta
te C
olle
ge13
315
617
2-20
025
628
328
330
629
125
52,
335
91.7
Tot
als
for
Sys
tem
inst
.-\
3,52
33,
917
4,12
84,
446
4,91
35,
120
5,13
45,
031
5,24
84,
913
46,3
7339
.5%
Yea
rly p
erce
nt in
crea
se11
.2%
5.4%
7.7%
10.5
%4.
2%.3
%-2
.0%
4.3%
-6.4
%
-Priv
ate
Inst
itutio
ns:
----
..
,
Brig
ham
You
ng U
nive
rsity
2,38
12,
880
e3,
242
3,50
63,
785
4,14
44,
311
4,09
34,
067
4,07
736
,486
71.2
%
Wes
tmin
ster
Col
lege
7847
104
105 --.
139
°12
315
015
618
116
4'1
1,26
711
0.3
2,45
92,
947
3,92
44,
267
4,46
14,
249
37,7
5372
.5%
Tot
als
for
priy
atei
nst.
3,61
13,
346
"4,2
484,
241
Yea
rly p
erce
nt in
crea
se ,-
11.6
419
.8%
22.5
%-7
.3%
17.3
%8.
7%4.
5%-4
.7%
-0.0
%-.
2%
Tot
al b
ache
lor,
deg
rees
awar
ded
in U
tah
5,98
26,
864
7,47
48,
057
8,83
79,
387
9,59
59,
280
9,49
69,
154
.84,
126
53.0
%
Yea
rly p
erce
nt in
crea
stfo
r al
l Uta
h in
stitu
tions
10.9
%14
.7%
8.9%
7.8%
9.7%
6.2%
2.2%
-3.3
%2.
3%-3
.6%
e -
Sou
rces
: Ins
titut
iona
l rep
orts
to U
joh
Coo
rdin
atin
g C
ounc
ilof
, Hig
her
Edu
catio
n, 1
1965
-66
thro
ugh
1966
-67,
HE
GIS
Rep
orts
196
7-68
thro
ugh
1974
-75.
At,
TABLE 4
VUtah System of Higher Education
Bachelor Degrees Conferred, 1970-71 Throu 974-75by Utah Public and Private Institutions d Area of Study
Public Institutions
-.
Area of Study 1970-71 1971.72 1972 3 1973-74 1974-755-Yr.Tital
Agriculture & Natural Resources 198 153 195 162 233 941Architecture & Environmental Design 32 27 1 25 23 108Area Studies 2 2 3 2 "9Biological Sciences o 239 203 250 219 205 1,116Business & Management 693 805 760 803 797 3,858Communications 49 57 87 131 104 428Computer & Information Sciences 93 91. 93 . 83 69 429Education 1,080 1,098 1,000 1,037 749 4,944Engineering 421 409 366 312' 368 1,876Fined Applied Arts 165 195 S 273 228 1,074 yForeign languages 93 .98 !,--- 101 95 99 486 .Health Professions 225 20 298 298 292 1,315Home Economics 192 56 179 a 191 195 893Low 8 4 4 38letters 343 267 291 228 1,473---,-::,--Mathematics . 106 84 73 59 65 387___...----
' Military Sciences -.-:;:-----,,, 2 2 . 4Physical Sciences 158 156 118 4133 172 737Psychology 157 214 249 306 .288 1,214Public Affairs & Services 15 96 51 118 65 345S---"lcici Scienc'es 852 746 704 681 713 3,696Theology .
Interdisciplinary Studies 4 9 20 24. 18 75,
Total 5,120 5,134 5,031 5,148 1.4;91 25,466Percent Increase over Previous Year 4.7% .3% 2.0% 4.3% 6.4%Sources: HEGIS Reports 1970-71 through 1974 75.
t.
40
Private institutionsPublic &Private5-Yr.Total
Percentof
TotalDegrees1970-71 1971-72 1972=73 1973-74
(;1
1974-755-Yr.Total
r55 67 120 64 99 405 1,346 2.9%27 33 25 45 42 172 280 .615 10 11 11 12 59 68 .2
266 269 265 235 251 1,286 2,402 5.1
423 424 382 486 456 2,171 6,029 12.9159 . 111 111 114 138 ,-. .633 1,061 2.325 54' 43 37 40 199 628 1.3
965 1,046 982 946 831 4,770 9,714 20.7214 235 230 187 186 1,052 2,928 6.2252 169 147 137 174 879 1,953 - 4.2166 218 173 165 170 892 1,378 2.959 105 89 115 119 / 487 1,802k 3.8
318 287 278 367 382 1,632 2,525 5.438
211 321 337 311 261 1,441 2,914 .6.247 39 51 47 49 233 620 1.3
4 .0
95 77 79 95 92 438 1,175 2.5 1
154 '193 147 125 142,167
761
6061,975
9514./2.0,132 82 79 146
640 590 593 431 365 2,619 6;315 13.5, 1 p 1 1 .01
44 130 107 184 265 730 805 1.71
100.q%'4,267 4,461 4,249 4,248 4,241 21,466 46,912,
8.r. 4.6% 4.8% .02%
41
TA
BLE
5
Uta
h S
yste
m o
f Hig
her
Edu
catio
n
Tot
al B
ache
lor's
Deg
rees
Aw
arde
d 19
74-7
5by
Maj
or F
ield
of S
tudy
and
Sex
-
Maj
or F
irr
Id o
f St
udy
' U o
f U
'
USU
M W
MW
,W
SCM
W-
T
SUSC
y
M W
TO
TA
L
PUB
LIC
M W
BY
U
M W
WE
ST -
'
MIN
STE
R
M W
TO
TA
L
PRIV
AT
E
M W
TO
TA
L
M W
Agr
icul
ture
& N
atur
al R
esou
rces
t22
013
220
13B
B11
8811
308
24
Arc
hite
ctur
e &
Env
ironm
enta
l Des
ign
2323
438
438
2738
Are
a S
tudi
es1
1,
--I-
368
1°..
111
1'
111
412
2
Bio
logi
cal S
cien
ces
8515
3417
J72
,33
195
513
219
853
370
-86
-
Bus
ines
s 3
Man
agem
ent
369
3512
732
176
1935
470
790
410
1825
343
521
1,14
211
1
Com
mun
icat
ions
4126
- 8
109
44
262
42-
106
32,
106
32i
168
74
Com
pute
r &
Info
rmat
ion
Sci
ence
s27
211
423
261
833
34
373
9811
Edu
catio
n58
174
9722
1,
3088
4536
230
519
194
610
18-1-
203
,62
843
3 1,
147
Eng
inee
ring
192
210
41
609
365
318
41
1t
T85
1.
550
4
Fin
e &
App
lied
Art
s'
3891
32, 3
6I
159
52
9013
880
848
288
86 i
178
224
For
eign
Lan
guag
es26
21i
614
1510
13
754
45.
1147
810
8- ,
59
1073
12
234
109
6116
310
6
1210
7[
126
285
Hea
lth P
rofe
ssid
ns10
816
75
8
Hom
e E
cono
mic
s4
735
782
267
1118
428
354
2835
439
6538
Law
i...
2.et
ters
7292
"19
176
1110
0-1
2881
169
,.9
8317
818
330
6
Mat
hem
atic
si
307
137
3A
154
11i
3512
11
3613
9024
Mili
tary
Sci
ence
s-'
Phy
sica
l Sci
ence
s96
6 1
461
161
616
48
80' 5
i4
384
8
9151
8681
282
83
172
93
248
16
Phy
chol
ogy
.12
178
'12
2227
10,
1417
411
491
5126
516
5
+--
137
95P
ublic
Affa
irs &
Ser
vice
s51
1451
1486
81
Soc
ial S
cien
ces
130
013
210
145
8312
2614
510
203
268
6714
1679
228
6
180
103
The
olog
y1 ,
47_
42
810
172
93In
terd
isci
plin
ary
Stu
dies
1
'
Tet
a'1
1,56
892
3
2,49
1
869
517
,3,
386
559
222
781
175
8025
53,
171
1,74
24,
913
2,26
4 1,
413
4,07
7.74
90
164
2,33
8 1,
903
4,24
1
5,50
9 3,
645
9,15
4P
prce
nt o
f Tot
al B
ache
lor's
Deg
rees
f27
.2%
15.2
%8.
5%2.
8%53
.7%
44.5
%1.
8%46
.3%
100.
0%
Sou
rce:
HE
G1S
Rep
ort 1
974-
75.
TA
BLE
6t
Uta
h S
yste
m o
f Hig
her
Edu
catio
n
Tot
al Y
early
Bac
helo
r D
egre
es C
onfe
rred
, Uta
h P
ublic
and
Priv
ate
Inst
itutio
ns,
1965
-66
Thr
ough
197
4-75
by
Are
a of
Stu
dy
4, A
rea
of S
tudy
1965
-66
1966
-67
1967
-63
1968
-69
1969
-70
1970
-719
1971
-72
1972
-73
1973
-74
1974
75
Agr
icul
ture
& N
atur
al R
esou
rces
8788
7212
617
725
322
031
5i22
633
2'
Arc
hite
ctur
e &
Env
ironm
enta
l Des
ign
13'
2518
2528
5960
2670
65
Are
a S
tudi
esx_
1512
1314
14
Bio
logi
cal S
cien
ces
-,'
361
422
448,
5,
467
460
505
472
515
454
456
Bus
ines
s &
Man
agem
ent
809
916
956
894.
51,
010.
51
116
1,42
279
1,14
2,
1,28
9'1
,253
Com
mun
icat
ions
'N20
816
819
8 '
245
242
Com
pute
r &
Info
rmat
iona
l SC
ienc
es12
3145
118
145
136
120
109
I
Edu
catio
n1,
230
1,29
91,
521
1,80
3.5
1,91
42,
025
2,14
41,
082
1,98
31,
580
Eng
inee
ring
x.35
738
435
237
142
163
5"6
4459
649
955
4
Eng
lish
and
Jour
nalis
m36
249
741
942
9.5
480
Fin
e an
d A
pplie
d A
rts
318
363
416
418
495.
541
736
436
041
040
2
For
eign
lang
uage
s20
924
831
730
429
6.5
-. 2
5931
627
426
0\ 2
69
For
esay
81_1
00_
120
5265
ttk
AG
eogr
aphy
3032
4254
.563
.5',-
-ta
Hea
lth P
rofe
ssio
ns15
218
618
520
215
928
430
738
741
341
1
Hom
e E
cono
mic
s
'''..C
.:
356
355
347
381.
551
3.5
510
423
457
558
577
'law
228
44
(....
)le
tters
555
664
604
602
489
Mat
hem
atic
s,
129
166
172
143.
518
4.5
153
173
124
106
114
Mili
tary
Sci
ence
s7
45
1' 2
e.2
2--
Phi
loso
ph*
1918
13.5
2013
I-,
-
Phy
sica
l Sci
ence
s18
418
5`
177
221
245.
527
623
197
228
264
Phy
chol
ogy
196
224
279.
529
235
028
839
643
1-43
0
Pub
lic A
ffairs
& S
ervi
ces
..,
147
178
130
264
232
Soc
ial S
cken
ces
1 00
51,
115
1 3)
3.5
1 51
51
549
1,49
21,
336
1,29
71,
112
1,07
8
/frad
e &
Indu
stria
l56
170
7913
619
1.5
x-T
heol
ogy
'1
Inte
rdiio
linar
ysc
2127
151
169
173
4813
912
7,-
408
283
TO
TA
L-5,
982
6,86
47,
474
5,05
7,8,
837
9,35
79,
595P
'9,
230,
--9,
496
9,15
4
°Beg
inni
ng w
ith th
e 19
70-7
1 ac
adem
ic y
ear,
Agr
icul
ture
& N
atur
al R
esou
rces
incl
uded
For
estr
y,w
hich
tras
lpre
viou
sly
liste
d se
para
tely
. Com
mun
icat
ions
incl
uded
Jour
nalis
m, -
whi
ch w
as p
revi
ousl
y lis
ted
unde
r E
nglis
h &
Jou
rnal
ism
. Eng
inee
ring
incl
uded
Ixdu
stria
l Art
s an
d tr
ade
Tec
hnol
ogy,
whi
ch w
ere
prev
ious
ly li
sted
und
er
Tra
de &
Indu
stria
l. le
tters
incl
uded
Eng
lish,
Spe
ech,
and
Phi
loso
phy,
whi
ch w
ere
prev
ious
ly li
sted
und
erE
nglis
h &
Jou
rnal
ism
, Fin
e .&
App
lied
Art
s, a
nd P
hilo
soph
y,
resp
ectiv
ely.
Soc
ial S
cien
ces
excl
uded
Pub
lic A
ffairs
& S
ervi
ces,
whi
ch w
as h
ence
fort
h lis
ted
sepa
rate
ly.''
.
SO
urce
s: In
stitu
tiona
l rep
orts
to U
tah
Coo
rdin
atin
g C
ounc
il of
Hig
her
Edu
catio
n, 1
965-
66th
roug
h 19
66-4
7. H
EG
IS R
epor
ts, 1
967-
68'1
hrou
gh 1
974-
75
%
TA
BLE
7
Uta
h S
yste
m o
f Hig
her
Edu
catio
n
Tot
al B
ache
lor's
Deg
rees
Aw
arde
d 19
74-7
5B
y M
ajor
Fie
ld o
f Stu
dy a
nd S
ex
Maj
or F
ield
of S
tudy
U o
f UU
SU
MV
ii M
W
T-
'-W
SC
SU
SC
M W
M-W
M
Al
BU
C WB
YU
M 13
W
---- W
ES
T-
MIN
ST
ER
M W
- -
--
--
TO
TA
L--
. PR
IVA
TE
MW
TO
TA
LM
W
Agr
icul
ture
& N
atur
al R
esou
rces
,A
gron
omy
113
113
Ani
mal
Sci
ence
'
i_ 2
12
I21
234
341
55D
airy
Sci
ence
91
4-9
19
Fis
h, G
ame,
& W
ildlif
e M
anag
emen
t67
67&
67H
ortic
ultu
reA
5A
5A
5 1A
gric
iAtu
ral E
cono
mic
s8
18
125
2533
Foo
d S
cien
ce &
Tec
hnol
ogy
22
34
34
5F
ores
try
j16
1616
Nat
ural
Res
ourc
es M
anag
emen
t15
515
515
Agr
icul
ture
& F
ores
try
Man
agem
ent
Ran
ge M
anag
emen
t58
358
39
967
Soi
ls S
cien
ce5
r5
Orn
amen
tal H
ortic
ultu
re1
1
Inte
rnat
iona
l Agr
icul
ture
Wat
ersh
ed S
cien
ce,
Ran
ge R
eser
vatio
n E
cono
my
Agr
icul
tura
l Bus
ines
s"
AA
AP
lant
Sci
ence
101
101
10S
oil &
Irrig
atio
n2
22
Bio
met
eoro
logy
2
' Arc
hite
ctur
e&
Env
ironm
enta
l Des
ign
'Env
ironn
tent
al D
elig
n G
ener
alA
rchi
tect
ure
Land
scap
e A
rchi
tect
ure
2a
2323
rIn
terio
r D
esig
n-
384
384
Are
a S
tudi
esA
sian
Stu
dies
, Gen
eral
88
Latin
- A
',..0
u'
s2
.1
.2
1
Maj
or F
ield
of S
tudy
Eur
opea
n S
tudi
es, G
ener
alA
mer
ican
Stu
dies
Mex
ican
Am
eric
an S
tudi
es
1
TA
BL
E 7
(co
nt.)
1
iT
OT
AL
,1W
ES
T -
TO
TA
L1
U o
f UU
SU
;IW
SC
!S
US
CP
UB
LIC
tB
YU
MIN
ST
ER
PR
IVA
TE
TO
TA
L
M W
'M IN
'IMW
WM
WM
WIM
WM
WM
W
4-4- -T
15
i
-1--
1.12
0
1 --t- t
4-
+
3 6
53
212
3
-T-
22
7
-I-
--,-
I-
1
20B
io lo
gica
l Sci
ence
sB
iolo
gy, G
ener
al[
85.
345
Bio
chem
istr
y+ -i- -,
---
-4--
-4- . -i- -t
3 t 1
6--
r-
18-t
170
30,
61
,_
__ 13
5
Bot
any,
Gen
eral
,-2
51
310
46
3
Bac
terio
logy
-,--
33 18 23
Pla
nt P
atho
logy
-706
Zoo
logy
, Gen
eral
t
T--
-.
21.4
i13
346
136
18±
Phy
siol
ogy,
Hum
an a
nd A
nim
al-t
--
--1
-4-
T t--
-S-
Mic
robi
olog
y8
3. -i-
353
Ent
omol
ogy
Med
ical
Bio
logy
---1
-
Nut
ritio
n, S
cien
tific
Bus
ines
s &
Man
agem
ent
Bus
ines
s &
Com
mer
ce, G
ener
al16
3518
135
18
Acc
ount
ing
427
481
51
102
188
188
1024
0
Bus
ines
s S
tatis
tics
992
2-j,
_-
Z .
1139
_11
410
_10 19
Ban
king
& F
inan
ce6
203
201
3
139
179-
10 8T
--ff
814
-3
---.
01B
usin
ess
Man
agem
ent &
Adm
inis
trat
ion
91.4
659
123
Hot
el &
Res
taur
ant M
anag
emen
t2
211
111
2
FA
AsA
ir T
raffi
c M
anag
emen
t4-
11
Mar
ketin
g &
Pur
chas
ing
:43
730
212
285
114-
185
11
Sec
reta
rial S
tudi
es8
8--
-lt-
4a
Labo
r &
Indu
stria
l Rel
atio
ns10
110
1'
10IL
'27
7
4_ ,25
-7 -+
1
1 1 16 2
Bus
ines
s E
cono
mic
s10
1I
1222
15
5
Pro
duct
ion
Man
agem
ent
7..-
7`,
:
Offi
ce A
dmin
istr
atio
n16
,r
16
Gov
ernm
ent L
ogis
tics
Man
agem
ent
,p25
2''
252
Rea
l Est
ate
11
-Com
mun
icat
ions
Com
mun
icat
ions
, Gen
eral
4026
94
r
42
5332
106
3110
631
159 8 ..
63 1-0
._ 1
Jour
nalis
ma
,10
810
Spe
ech
(The
atre
),..
..,
.
Adv
ertis
ing
TA
BLE
7
*.
TO
TA
LI
WE
ST
-I
TO
TA
LI
U o
f UU
SU
.W
SC
SU
SC
PU
BLI
CI
BY
UM
INS
TE
RI
PR
IVA
TE
TO
TA
LM
ajor
Fie
ld o
f Stu
dyM
_WR
adio
. Tel
evis
ion
1
Com
pute
r &
Info
rmat
ion
Sci
ence
s.
Com
pute
r &
Info
rmat
ion
Sci
ence
s,G
ener
al.
:27
2,
-..-
Dat
a.P
roce
ssin
g-,
,_
FA
A C
onip
uter
Sci
ence
C7,
4,1
Edu
catio
nG
ener
alE
duca
tion,
L._.
4E
lem
enta
a.E
duca
tion
Gen
eral
1510
5S
econ
dary
Edu
catio
n, G
ener
al.N
.S
peci
al E
duca
tion,
Gen
eral
124
0..
Spe
cial
Lea
rnin
g D
isab
ilitie
sA
rt E
duca
tion
11 ,M
usic
Edu
catio
n...
'M
athe
mat
ics
Edu
catio
n.
--,
Phy
sica
l Edu
catio
n24
11
Hea
lth E
duca
tion
182-
'1--
-,-
Bus
ines
s C
omm
erce
, & D
istr
ibut
ive
Edu
catio
n4
M 11 14
W
4
_
84 14 24
M.W
MW
MW
-IM
W IM
WM
'
:
33
1.,
:
,- ;1
-.I-
38.6
333
-i-
r 23
8 6 3
2
62!
11
23-
, r
2
---
..
+--
-..4
1
-4-
25:
4827
650
346
113
5118 6 15
1 2
-3 2
, i
..-:
1814
21
'5
47
17
.-
4-1-
6--
116
483
507
3
4__
I- 4._
!3
31-
2
r-!
---
24_
1
14 5'1
29
;
.7
'
1
+-
i + i
5
1 5
11 3
.,--
.
25
2 4 es
'1
3-t
9[
7139
434
492I
3i5
2-I
-
12 -41-
--
,19
2 11
5.
---t
-
4712
4J,
f,4
.i.48
14
7
1 1
-+ 1--
!1
11- 4. i
.4i t
75
3.15
5,
L_
)55
1420
1420
2424
430
3130
1
Spe
ech
Cor
rect
ion
tIn
dust
rial A
rts,
Voc
atio
nal &
Tec
hnic
al E
duca
tion
Pre
elem
enta
ry E
duca
tion
,
Edu
catio
n of
Exc
eptio
nal C
hild
ren,
not
cla
ssifi
able
abov
eA
gric
ultu
ral E
duca
tion
Hom
e E
cono
mic
s E
duca
tion
Nur
sing
Edu
catio
n!P
hysi
cal E
duca
tion
Non
teac
hing
Rec
reat
ion
Edu
catio
nS
cien
ce E
duca
tion
Edu
catio
nal P
sych
olog
yP
re-e
lem
enta
ry E
duca
tion
4.,0
00,1
1P1
Edu
catio
n of
the
Men
tally
Ret
arde
dE
duca
tiona
l Sup
ervi
sion
Edu
catio
n of
the
Cul
tura
lly D
isad
vant
aged
es
tI
-.t
-,4-
.,-
.-1
!.L
.
...,.
....
-.,
1
W.M
W
1
371
,9
1---
232
359
:99
635
525
1950
1098
-
62
11!
353
123 19
34A
Y 1
-1-7
88
1 1
-18-
i--
53
155
1420 24
3130
31
....
'T
AB
LE 7
(co
nt)
Maj
or F
ield
of S
tudy
Eng
inee
ring
Eng
inee
ring,
Gen
eral
Che
mic
al E
ngin
eerin
g__
Civ
il. C
onst
ruct
ion.
and
Tra
nspo
rta
onE
ngin
eerin
gE
lect
rical
, Ele
ctro
nics
, and
Com
mun
icat
ions
Eng
inee
ring
5421
Mec
hani
Cal
Eng
inee
ring_
-
461
7
geol
ogic
al E
ngin
eerin
g3
Indu
stria
l 8 M
anag
emen
t Eng
inee
ring
Met
allu
rgic
al E
ngin
eerin
gM
ater
ials
Eng
inee
ring
Cer
amic
Eng
inee
ring_
Min
ing
and
Min
er&
Eng
inee
ring
Eng
inee
ring
Tec
hnol
ogie
s
---
-7-
-1 ,
U o
f UU
SU
WS
C
M W
MO
NM
W
25-
-
32
3
11
9_ 5
.1
-4-
-42
-M
anuf
actu
ring
Eng
inee
ring
Env
ironm
enta
l 8 S
anita
ry E
ngin
eerin
gP
hyst
cal P
lant
Adm
inis
trat
ion
Agr
icul
tura
l Eng
inee
ring
FA
A E
lect
roni
c T
echn
olog
y
1
*--
---
--".
'11-
---;
--,-
---
-,
Fin
e an
d A
pplie
d A
rts
Fin
e A
rts,
Gen
eral
1722
1-
Art
(P
aint
ing,
Dra
win
g_, S
culp
ture
)6
I a17
30
Mus
ic (
Per
form
ing,
CoM
posi
tion,
-t-'
The
ory)
1416
Mus
ic (
Libe
ral A
rts
Pro
gram
)13
44
2
Dra
mat
ic A
rts
412
27
3
Dan
ce2
333
Com
mer
cial
___A
rt,
Art
, Com
mun
icat
ion
1
21,
Cin
emat
ogra
phy
. For
eign
lang
uage
sF
renc
h5
69
6
Ger
man
71
42
62
Spa
nish
611
23
92
Rus
sian
41
TO
TA
LS
US
CP
UB
LIC
M W
'M W
- *
BY
UM
W
'(
WE
ST
--
MIN
ST
ER
'MV
iT
OT
AL
PR
IVA
TE
-MW
, ..--- -,
TO
TA
LM
W-' 25 34
1
-:-
1717
, -1
17--
---
'i-
-,-
3229
,
-,-29 50 30
61 '125 83 -1
175
5053
130
15 9 151
T1-
69 17
37,7
1
T
1 I
.22 69
-;15
9
58
1
15
!
151
1+1 5 17
-4 -i-
r1
44-
---1
22-1
-
-r-
1-1
-
1
- -.
1
1
2432
4636
11
47
1416
2333
237
3337
1'
2449
717
6-13
2511
.15
1115
2440
236
236
21
-
1621
1115
J.11
1637
522
519
121
120
1242
1
7417 41
219
1655
s 24
155
25-
33
21
7-
3
.
Maj
or F
ield
of S
tudy
Chi
nese
Japa
nese
Latin
Gre
ek, C
li'os
sica
lA
rabi
c
Por
tugu
ese
Italia
n
TA
BLE
7 (
con
?.)"
U o
f U,
US
UM
WM
W_
;TO
TA
LW
SC
SU
SC
PU
BLI
CM
WW
M W
-4--
c1I
WE
ST
-T
OT
AL
MIN
ST
ER
BY
Ui M
INS
TE
RP
RIV
AT
E'
TO
TA
LM
W;/.
11W
1M
W ',
MW
4 1 3 5
____
,_.
3
Hea
lth P
rofe
ssio
nsH
ealth
Pro
fess
ions
, Gen
eral
Nur
sing
(B
acca
laur
eate
and
Hig
her
Pro
grom
s2D
enta
l Spe
cial
ties
(Wor
k B
eyon
dF
irst-
Pro
fess
iona
l Deg
ree.
03D
.D.S
. or
D.M
.D.)
..1M
edic
al S
peci
altie
s (W
ork
Bey
ohd
.Firs
hPro
fess
iona
l Deg
ree,
M.D
Pha
rmac
y-
Phy
sica
l The
rapy
Hos
pita
l and
Hea
lth C
are
Ay
min
istr
atio
n1
Pub
lic H
ealth
Vet
erin
ary
Med
icin
e pe
cial
ties
(Wor
k B
eyon
dsr
-Pro
fess
iona
lD
egre
e:0
VSp
eech
Pat
lagy
pnd
AL
crlo
gy.
119
Med
ical
abo
rato
ry T
ech
ies
4(B
cala
urea
te a
nd H
r' he
rro
aram
sl.
ome
Eco
nom
ics
Hom
e E
cano
mic
si C
ener
ltil
Clo
thin
g an
d T
extil
esC
onsu
mer
Eco
nom
ics
&
Man
agem
ent
1:
Fam
ily R
elat
ions
and
Chi
ldD
evel
apm
ent
Foa
ds a
nd h
tutr
ihon
Fam
ily L
ge &
Offi
ce A
dmin
istr
atio
n
712
216
8
B11
82
5812
216
1 2
me
22 1
19
1912
r
1-3
;21
'23
107
17
--{
2222
-
.42
40'
116
r2
263
156
82
342
258.
212
-- 4
i',
-,I
4, ..
42 1 1
2
,_ 3
- 3 5
_4
'1
2-'-
+
' _L1 3
1'
1 ±5
1 2_,
17
206
126
2t
.__3
_2
__,
_a
178
178 12 58 21
1
5533
488
I2 1
19
121
25
74'
.17 96
106
174
1
24
4
25
24
233
233
2827
523
i2
2310
44
TA
BLE
7co
nt.)
Maj
or F
old
of S
tudy
1.
,U
of V
' W M
W
i . .W
SC
.MW
SU
SC
M W
TO
TA
LP
UB
LIC
-M-
W-
BY
UM
-W
WE
ST
-M
INS
TE
RM
W-
TO
TA
LP
RIV
AT
E .
M W
,,. T
OT
AL
M W
Law La
w, G
ener
alLe
tters
Eng
lish
Gen
eral
538
1114
611
38
-
7311
458
103
2fz
6011
113
322
5
Ling
uist
ics
11
1
Spe
ech,
Deb
ate,
and
fore
nsic
once
106
. 8,3
189
2065
.
1
2065
381
'+8
74 6-
Phi
laso
h'
85,
,,=b,
'8
p;:in
icira
ttve
Lite
ratu
re
307
S,
1152
11
3
2910
11
3f
30
11
11
3
82
1
22-M
athe
mat
ics
Mat
hem
atic
s, G
ener
al-_
,.Sta
tistic
s, M
athe
mat
ical
& T
he r
etitc
la
22
62
6 ,..
28
2
Mili
tary
Sci
ence
s-
Mili
tary
Sci
ence
(A
rmy)
Phy
sica
l Sci
eriC
es, G
ener
alP
hysi
cs, G
ener
al...
,-6-
312
41
31 211
271
:2 271 1
33 481 2
Che
mis
try;
Gen
eral
303r
.Id
,.6
463
353
353
816
Atm
as h
eric
Sci
ence
s &
Met
eoro
logy
33`
3 .
33...
'-33
3
Geo
agy
1411
2' `.
2718
-20
347
3
Geo
phys
ics
and
Sei
smol
ogy
44
4
Min
eral
ogy
,._
Ear
th S
cien
ce's
, Gen
eral
.
Org
anic
Che
mis
try'
11
.-
+-
.'
.
Psy
chol
ogy
Psy
chol
ogy,
Gen
eral
121
7812
2227
'10
....,
-14
- 4
117
411
491
5191
51l' 2
6516
5
Pub
lic A
ffairs
and
Sas
-vic
es.
Par
ks a
nd R
ecre
atio
n M
anag
emen
t'
i
Soc
ial W
ork
& H
el.i
Ser
viC
es'
1311
1311
2771
2771
'40
82
PQ
ice
Sci
ence
383
383
383
-LO
W\E
nfor
cem
ent &
Cor
rect
ions
S...
5910
5910
5910
Soc
ial S
cien
ces
Soc
ial S
cien
ces;
Gen
eral
33
1013
11
1417
1417
Ant
hrop
olog
y1
1518
1518
15
15
16"
23
Arc
haeo
logy
51
51
Ot
£0
TA
BLE
7 (
coat
)..e
/1
aa
A..
Maj
or F
ield
of S
tudy
.
- U o
f UM
WU
SU
M W _
WS
C.-
M :1
14
-
SU
SC
M' W
TO
TA
LP
UB
LIC
..'
M W
hYU
'M
W' '
WE
ST
-M
INS
TE
RM
. W
. TO
TA
L
PR
IVA
TE
.' M
WT
OT
AL
-
'01
W,
.Eco
nom
ics
455
_45
-551
M...
"-"
51 -
9l5,
5
His
tory
-52
23,
2012
296
6"
2,1
0743
5415
454
19...
161
62G
eogr
aphy
4,'4
5.6
111
1.9
165
n8
22'
2_
6..
22, 2
8710
Pol
itica
l Sci
ence
&G
over
nmen
t.,
20r
403
279
'1
147
2476
11'7
6It
233
35-
Soc
iolo
gyoe9
5720
16/0
185
TO
1010
788
'47
2947
' 29
154
117
Inte
rnat
iona
l Rel
atia
ns,
.'
124
.12
4.1
24
Beh
avio
ral S
cien
ces`
...3.
1212
1212
,-12
'12
.. .i-'
Hum
an R
elat
ions
,2
'2-:
-.
.
The
olog
y-
The
olog
y".
The
olog
ical
Pro
fess
ions
-°
_.
Inte
rdis
cipl
inar
y S
tudi
es-
Gtr
al L
iber
al A
rts
& S
cien
ces
'
7".
.41
"4
7.4
39 -
47
413
9\
47,
-14
3 r'
54 .
41
Bia
iglg
Ral
& P
hysi
cal S
cien
ces
Hum
aniti
es &
Soc
ial S
cien
ces
_-
;-
17
2727
728
. .
You
th L
ecid
ersh
ip '(
v4.r
.°
2616
-26
11.
.26
16 '
Gen
ealo
gy T
echn
Agy
_,.
.3
..3
..
Env
iron
I Sci
ence
/tv
Pis
usic
Edu
catio
nC
omm
unic
atio
n in
Man
agem
ent
-'
,-
-
'Uni
vers
ity S
tudi
esW
omen
's S
tudi
es1
--
I,
.'
.1
..
.'G
rand
'fet
al'
''.
1
1,56
8 92
3'.
.
2;49
1
869 1
,
517
3 86
559.
.22
,2
781
`
175
80
"255
.
3;17
1 1,
742
2244
1;1
8)3
74i,
, 4,9
134,
077
' r`_
.14
4.
902,
3381
.903
!..4,
24-1
5,50
9 3,
645
9;15
4'
Sou
rce:
HG
IS R
itsor
t 191
4 -7
5:
4?"
TA
BLE
8
sU
tah
Sys
tem
`of
Hig
her
Edu
clat
ion
aste
r's D
egre
es C
onfe
rred
, Pub
lic a
nd P
rivat
e In
stitu
tions
,,19
65-6
6 T
hrou
gh 1
974-
75 B
y In
stitu
tion
-
4In
stitu
tion
1965
-66
1966
.67'
1967
-68
1968
-69
T96
9t70
1970
-71
Sys
tem
Inst
itutio
ns:
.U
nive
rsity
of U
tah°
Uta
h S
tate
Uni
vers
ity-
4T
otal
s fo
r sy
stem
inst
,-
..'
°d11
terC
ent i
nCre
Cis
e.
469
313
532
3924
573
' 339
-666 42
7
, 735 46
7
885
427
782
. 924
?12
1,1)
931,
202
1,31
2
0..
,9.
4%,
18.2
%-1
.3%
19.e
%12
/0%
9.2%
1P
rivdt
e In
stitu
tions
:,
,B
righa
m y
clun
g U
nive
rsity
°=
Wes
tmin
ster
".... -
Tot
als
for
Priv
ate
inst
.
Yea
rlyzp
erce
nt in
crea
se
ii36
1 -,
428 -
536
--.
-6.
43
.3
624
70-4 -
361
''"42
853
6. 6
4662
670
4
, 33.
7%18
.6%
25.2
%20
.5%
-3.0
%12
.5%
Tot
al m
aste
r's d
egre
esaw
arde
d in
Uta
h1,
143
T.
1,35
21,
448
1,73
9-
1,82
8'2,
016
Yea
rly p
erce
nt in
crea
se
fOr.
all
Uta
h in
st. 3
F16
.0%
18.3
%7.
1%20
.1%
5.1%
10.3
%
1971
-72
955
452
1,40
7
7.2%
-75
7r
761
8.1%
2,16
8
7.5%
972-
7319
73-7
419
74-7
5
Ton
-Y
ear
Tot
al
Yo
Inc.
1974
-75
Ove
r19
65-6
6
... ,
956
1,18
31,
049
8,00
312
3.7%
467
471
375"
4,13
0,
19.8
''
1,42
31,
654
1,42
4.12
,133
82.1
94,
,.
14%
16.2
%-1
3.9%
.746
720'
846
6,36
513
4.3%
L._
9-
-.-. 74
6 ,.
720
.846
6,37
413
4.3%
-2.0
%-3
,5%
17.5
%
,
2,16
92;
374
2,27
018
,507
98.6
%
.1%
1,30
4:7%
-4.4
%
°InC
lude
;, be
ginn
ing
with
the
1971
-72
acad
emic
yea
r, M
aste
r of
Phi
losb
phy.
cleg
rere
s, w
hich
are
the
equi
vale
nt o
f doc
tora
l deg
rees
with
out
diss
erta
tions
.r''
.-.
ck.
t'Inc
lude
s, b
egin
ning
with
the
1974
-75
acad
emic
yea
r, S
ix-y
ear
Cer
tific
ates
.,
--,.
.S
ourc
es: t
ristit
utio
nal r
epor
ts to
Uta
h C
oord
inat
ing
Cou
ncil
of H
ighe
r E
duca
tion,
196
5-66
thro
ugh
1966
-67.
HE
GIS
Rep
orts
, 196
7-68
thro
ugh
1974
;75.
d ..
.i-'0
.
. O.
TABLE 9
Utah System of Higher Education
Master's Degrdes, Utah Public and Private Institutions,1970-71 Through 1974-75 ByArea of Study
. \Aria of Study
______,t,
Public Institutions'
1970-71 1971-72° 1972-73 1973-74 1974-75/5-Yr.
Total,...
Agriculture & Natural Resources -., 32
4 is
32 56 58 36 214
Architecture & EnvirohmeAtal Design 5 16' 15 . "18 27 81
Area Studies 3 3
Biological Sciences 32 i 45 40 35 19 171
Business & Managelnent 313 286. 376 481 451 1,907
COmmunications 5 12 - 6 4 27
Cumputer & Information Services 5 40 7 9 37
Educcitiori 1 389 385 335 313 1,796
Engineering 162 145 - 148 417 771
Fine & Applied Arts 34 63 35 34 9 2 01
Foreign Languag.e 14 16 -,12 28 Li 3 105
Health Professions 27 53 32 - 61. 49 222
Home Economics' t 17. 2%
14
15,
15i
21
32
25 98
Library Science
letters 46 ; 49 38 , 61 ' 41 L1: 235:
Mathematics 20 75 -A8 29 15 . 157
Physical Sciences 28 . 43 .45 . 33 39 4,179
Psychology 11 27 18 23 28 107
Public Affairs 6,iServices4 b 90 a. 107 98 107 101 503
Social Services . 87 66 55 i 73 54 33'5
Interdisciplinary Studies
Theology
Total 1,312 1,407 1,423 1,654 1,424 7,220
Percent Increase over Previous'Year ^ '9.2% 7.2% 1.1% 16.2% L-13.9%
1" ItiOudes, beginning with the 1971-72 acaderhic year, Master of Philosophy\ degrees, wkichar,* the equivalent of doctoral degrees without dissertations, awardgd by the University of Utah.
b Includes, beginning with the 1974-75 academic year, Six-yeare4 Certificates awarded by
Brigham Young University.
Sources: HEGIS Reports, 197071 through 1974 -75.-
7 1
52
Private institutions . --,-,974 -75b Total
Public &PrivatePr5i.vyarte
5 -Yr.Total
Percentof
TotalDegrees1970-71
-7--r---
1971-72 197.2-73 1973-74
. 2 3 , 6 . 8 7 26 240 2,2%
-- , 2 83 .7
2 1 3 3 6 15 18 .2
"17 23 34 24 37 135 306 ,,2.8
50 82 ,, 74 121
14
93 420 .3,327 21.1
16. '10 15 8 63 90 .8
---,3-
1 2 3 40 .4
220 236 217 203 335 1,21V 3,007 27.3
90 87. 62 63 73 375 1,152 10.5
30. 18 ° 18 31 26 123 328, 3.0
15 22 18 ' 15 21 91 , 196 1.8
21 11 14 13 8 67 289 2.6
12 19 20 21 30 102 200 1.8
43 37
26
47" 46 , 26 199 260 2,4
28 53 . 3,1 197 432 3.9
15
'.-10 f,6
33
14 , 20 70 227 2.1
r24 22 107 286 2 6
18
4432
. .14 10 6 2 50 157 1.4
87
'3185 3 49 298 801 7.3
25 34 35 157 492 435
' 2 2 4 4 .0
19 1,5 11 4 , 13 62 62 .6
704 761' 746 II720 846 3,777 10,997 100.0%
12.5% 8.0% -2.0% 0 -3.5% 175%
116
TA
BLE
10
Uta
h S
yste
m o
f Hig
her
Edu
catio
n
Tot
al Y
early
Mas
ter's
Deg
rees
Con
ferr
ed, U
tah
Pub
lic a
nd P
rivat
e In
stitu
tions
,19
65-6
6 T
hrou
gh 1
974-
75 B
y A
rea
of S
tudy
-
to
th
0
Are
a of
Stu
dy19
65-6
619
66-6
719
67-6
819
68 -
6919
69-7
014
70-7
1°19
71-7
2b19
72-7
319
73-7
419
74-7
5'A
gric
ultu
re &
Nat
ural
Res
ourc
es26
2512
3328
3435
6266
43A
rchi
tect
ure
& E
nviro
nmen
tal D
esig
n.
15
1615
2027
Are
a S
tudi
es2
1,I
63
6B
iolo
gica
l Sci
ence
s-
48,
'72
6572
.75
4968
7461
56B
usin
ess
& M
onog
emen
t15
820
5r18
724
42.
1736
3 '
368
, 450
'60
254
4C
omm
unic
atio
ns16
-15
- 27
-20
12C
ompu
ter
& In
form
atio
n S
cien
ces
-'
35
45
107
.7
11E
duca
tion
328
368
.39
653
157
160
962
1-5
5257
864
8ng
inee
ring
120
128'
157
205
200
252
'23
221
023
722
1E
nglis
h &
Jou
rnal
ism
.41
'69
4849
60F
ine
& A
pplie
d A
rts
7771
6580
80'
6481
5365
65F
orei
gn L
angu
ages
1531
2526
3929
1830
4356
For
estr
y13
1911
16G
eogr
aphy
-6
- 8
127
Hea
lth P
rofe
ssio
ns13
1213
1620
4864
4671
57H
ome
Eco
nom
ics
2520
2342
3229
3935
4255
Lette
rs r
-74
7591
120
72't.
Libr
ary
Sci
ence
2123
3143
5162
7826
Mat
hem
atic
s19
3541
2733
3531
8244
35P
hilo
soph
y2
43
4P
hysi
cal S
cien
ces
4137
4535
4838
7665
5552
Psy
chol
ogy
-29
2144
-44
3829
.41
2829
30P
ublic
Affa
irs &
Ser
vice
s15
419
418
312
015
0S
ocia
l Sci
ence
s15
120
920
825
329
411
997
8010
789
The
olog
y11
414
169
1915
114
13T
rade
& In
dust
rial
2722
Inte
rdis
cipl
inar
y53
1221
22
Tot
als
1,14
31,
352
1,44
81,
739
1,82
82,
016'
2,16
82,
169
2,37
42,
270
Beg
inni
ng w
ith th
e 19
70-7
1 ac
adem
ic y
ear,
Agr
icul
ture
& N
atur
al R
esou
rces
incl
uded
fore
stry
, whi
ch w
as p
revi
ousl
y lis
ted
sepa
rate
ly. C
omm
unic
atio
ns in
-cl
uded
Jou
rnal
ism
, whi
ch w
as p
revi
ousl
y lis
ted
unde
r E
nglis
hJo
urna
lism
. Eng
inee
ring
incl
uded
Indu
stria
l Art
s an
d T
rade
Tec
hnol
ogy,
whi
ch w
ere
prev
ious
ly li
sted
unde
r T
rade
& In
dust
rial.
Lette
rs in
clud
ed E
nglis
h, S
peec
h, a
nd P
hilo
soph
y, w
hich
wer
e pr
evio
usly
list
ed u
nder
Eng
lish
.& J
oOrn
alis
rn, F
ine
it A
pplie
d A
rts,
and
Phi
-lo
soph
y, r
espe
ctiv
ely.
Soc
ial S
cien
ces
excl
uded
Pub
lic A
ffRirs
& S
ervi
ces,
whi
ch w
as h
ence
fort
h lis
ted
sepa
rate
ly.
b In
clud
es, b
egin
ning
with
the
1971
-72
acad
emic
year
, Mas
ter
of P
hilo
soph
y de
gree
s, w
hich
are
the
equi
vale
nt o
f doc
tora
l deg
rees
with
out d
isse
rtat
ions
, aw
arde
dby
the
Uni
iiers
ity o
f Uta
h.
Incl
udes
, beg
inni
ng w
ith th
e 19
74-7
5 ac
adem
ic y
ear,
Six
-yea
r C
ertif
icat
es a
war
ded
by B
righa
m V
otin
gU
nive
rsity
.
Sou
rces
: Ins
titut
iona
l rep
orts
to U
tah
Coo
rdin
atin
g C
ounc
il of
Hig
her
Edu
catio
n, 1
965-
66 th
roug
h 19
66-6
7.
HE
GI§
Rep
orts
, 196
7-68
thro
ugh
1974
-75.
TA
BLE
Uta
h S
yste
m o
f Hig
r E
duca
tion
Doc
tora
tes
(Inc
ludi
ng.
.an
d M
.D.$
) C
onfe
rred
,U
tah
Pub
lic a
nd P
rivat
e In
stitu
tions
, 196
5-66
Thr
ough
,197
4-75
,By
Inst
itutio
n
...I
pi.,,
..
Inst
iagi
on19
65-6
619
66-6
7
138
52
1967
-68
1968
-69
1969
-70
1970
-71
1971
-72
,4
1972
:73
1973
-74
1974
-75
Ten
Yea
rT
otal
14.
Sys
tem
Inst
itutio
ns:
'U
nive
rsity
of U
tah
Ph.
6; &
Ed.
D.
-....
-e!
113
`.44
142
54 8528
1
193
-24
823
8 6827
9 .
6222
425
224
52,
072
M.D
.65
6373
76.
9765
4.
.'.1.
D. (
LL.B
.)T
otal
5821
5 36
251
7.7% 14
9
73 26 56
t-86
90.
9811
715
412
213
61,
019
.34
440
140
445
845
145
047
83,
745
Uta
h S
tate
Uni
vers
ityP
h.D
. & E
d.D
.59
74--
-..-
4Y8
101
7910
7
,,-
128
104
7682
0
Tot
al D
octo
rate
s(in
c. J
.D.s
te M
. D
. s
)'
conf
erre
d in
Sys
tem
319
27.1
%
194.
340.
502
483
565'
579
554
554
4,56
5
--7
Per
cent
incr
ease
ovi
rpr
evio
us y
ear
6.6%
..2
2.9%
20.1
%-4
.0%
17.0
%2.
5%-4
.3%
Tot
al P
h.D
.s &
Ed.
D.s
Apn
fen.
ed in
Sys
tem
201
267
349
317
386
352
356
321
2,89
2
75
Per
cent
incr
ease
ove
rpr
evio
us y
ear
39.3
%30
.2%
3.4%
32.8
%30
.7%
-9.2
%
77 i
21.8
%
7,.
105
,,-8.
8%4
,-10
8
1.1%
86
-9.8
%
160
Priv
ate
Inst
itutio
ns:
Brig
ham
You
ng U
nive
rsity
Ph.
D. &
Ed.
D.
34.
2346
4$64
Tot
al P
h.D
.s &
Ed.
D.s
conf
erre
d in
'Uta
h18
321
724
731
54*
394
491
460
442
481
Per
cent
incr
ease
ove
rpr
evio
us y
ear
---1
-37
.6%
18.6
%13
.8%
.59'
0*31
.1%
-4.6
%24
.6%
-6.3
7%-3
.9%
8.8%
Tot
al D
octo
rate
s(in
c. J
.D.s
& M
.D.$
)co
nfer
red
in U
tah
285
12.2
%
342
20.0
%
386
12.9
%
466
'56
656
067
068
764
071
45.
316
Per
cent
incr
ease
ove
rpr
evio
us y
ear
20.7
%.
21.5
%1.
1%19
.6%
.
2.5%
-6.8
%11
.6%
Sou
rces
: Ins
titut
iona
l rep
ots
to U
tah
Coo
rdin
atin
g C
ounc
il of
Hig
her
Edu
catio
n, 1
965
-66
thro
ugh
1966
-67.
HE
GIS
Rep
orts
/967
-68
thro
ugh
1974
-75.
TABLE 12
Utah Sysom of Higherlducation
Doctorates Conferred; Utah Public and,Private Institutions,*by Area of Study, 1970-71 Through 1974-75
I
wn
Publii Institutions...
r.Arita of Study 1970-71 1971-72 1972-)3 1973-74 1974-75 a al
Agriculture & Natural Resources 24 9 9 13 12 .7Area Studies ---trt 71.--
Biological Sciences 39 64 42 45Business & Management t- 2 7 7 17, ,Communications
,Computer & Information Sciietces 4 - ?Education
.
104.
ti 127 14Engineering : 35 52 3..__Fine & Applied Arts 8 1
Fdreign LanguageL 5 7
Health Professions1
Home Economics ., , ..
Law .
-i---Letters
__ __ _ -I--19 24: -1--
Librory ScienceMbthematics
1 8t 3Physical Sciences
.42 34
Psychology 11-4_ 13 21
Public Affairs 8. Services, 1 1'
Social Sciences -t17 2B
Theology
Total 318 386Percent Increase over
Previous Year B 94;; 2 I' 4%
E,tcludes first professional degrees
Sources HEGIS Reports 1970 71 through 19'74 75
7J56
19 14 1
5 3 927 36 t 3116 21? 23
5 8 621 '20 17
352 356 321
-8 8% 1 1% 9.8%
1,733
Private Institutions
19704-J1971-721972-73 M3-74111974 Total- . 1-
, 5-Yr.
F 75-4-
ublic &Private
5-Yr.,Total
--
1
Percent.of
Totalt.0%
10 10 4 7 5 36 260 11 5,- - -- 7 39 1.7t . --t-
12 g-
_ 5
32 57 69 44 94 .296 905 39.90-, - - -1
3 5 5 , 2 15 X210 .9.3
3 3 1 6 2 15 41
2 " ..L..., 2 6 26 1.2
«1 20
.,.9
4 19 219
'14- 11 13
3 9 8 3 r 1 34 136 6.0-i-1 21 9
2 1 N ,k2 3 3 r 11 7 114 1 5.0
. 5 b 2 9 1 1. 25 25 l' 1 1-
77 * 105 108 ' 86 160 1 536 2,269 1 100.06/o
1 1-
-F-
20 3% 36 4% 2 9% 20 4%1 86.0% ,
,..
I t I 89 T 3.9-
26 26-f 26-'' 1 2= -
F, 28
;1 2,,,
5.'2 222 98
tr.
57
cf.
TA
BLE
13
Uta
h. S
yste
m o
f Hig
her
Edu
catio
n
Mas
ter;
kand
Doc
tor's
Deg
rees
Con
ferr
ed 1
974-
75B
y S
ex o
f StU
dent
and
Gen
eral
Are
a of
StU
dy
Doc
tor's
°
Are
a of
Stu
dy
U o
f U
MW
US
U
MW
Tot
alP
ublic
MW
BY
U
MW
Tot
al- U
of U
MW
MW
US
U
MW
Tot
alI
IYU
111
1T
otal
MW
,P
.1W
'M W
Agt
icul
ture
& N
atur
al R
esou
rces
3636
743
1212
12
Arc
hite
ctur
e &
Env
ironm
enta
l Des
ign
22J
527
27A
rea-
Stu
dies
,..
51
5B
iolo
gica
l Sci
ence
s3
114
117
229
8.46
1024
17
231
35
36
Bus
ines
s &
Man
agem
ent
363
2362
342
5,26
i92
li51
,27
33
66
,C
omm
unic
atio
ns4
47
111
11
11
Com
pute
r &
Info
rmat
ion
Sci
ence
s8
18
12
101
44
4
Edu
catio
n-
9011
573
3552
163'
150
TA
S3
245b
9073
408
240'
218
3
6828
12.
280
30 1
78.
4 6
2515
40'
2
158
46 -
Eng
inee
ring
342
Fin
e &
App
lied
Art
s20
127
2712
215
4817
4.4
44
26
For
eign
Lan
guag
es28
728
716
544
122
22
3
Hea
lth P
rofe
ssio
ns8
418
Al
35
1146
2;
22
-Kan
e E
cono
mic
s17
817
219
2926
22
3T
.',3
3
lette
rs.
2015
33
2318
1813
a41
317
57
51
76
libra
ry S
cien
ce5
1
2626
2626
Mat
hem
atic
s9:
4-17
331
49
99
Phy
sica
l Sci
ence
s21
18
291
202
49,
323
26
292
91
383
-Psy
chol
ogy
95
86
1711
2'19
119
93
185
1129
5
Piib
lic A
ffairi
& S
ervi
ces
5843
5843
481
106
442
4. 2
42
4,
Soc
ial S
cier
ries
254
205
45lif
323
7712
122
3'1
5.2
17 A
3
The
olog
y12
112
11
1
Inte
rdis
cipl
inar
y S
tudi
es2
2
Tot
als
777
272
1,04
9
305-
-'--
70-70
375
1,08
234
21,
424
670
176
846
1,75
251
8
2,27
0
T95
5024
5
679,
76
242
59
321
140
20
160
402
79
481
Per
cent
of T
otal
Deg
rees
46.2
%16
.5%
62.7
%3.
73%
100.
0%50
.9%
15.8
%66
.7%
33.3
%10
0.0%
c. D
oes
not i
nclu
de fi
rst p
rofe
ssio
nal d
egre
es.
b In
clud
es o
ne S
ix-y
ear
Cer
tific
ate
awar
ded
in P
ublic
Sch
ocil
Adm
inis
trcf
ton.
.
Incl
udes
one
Mas
ter
of P
hilo
soph
y de
gree
, whi
ch is
the
equi
vale
nt o
f a d
octo
ral d
egre
e w
ithou
t a d
isse
rtat
ion'
, aw
arde
d in
Ele
ctric
al E
ngin
eerin
g.
d In
clud
es-o
ne S
ix-y
ear
Cer
tific
ate
awar
ded
in, E
nglis
h as
a S
econ
d 1°
4/ag
e
Sou
rces
: HE
GIS
Rep
orts
, 197
4 -7
5.
TA
BLE
14
Uta
h S
yste
m o
f Hig
her
Edu
catio
n
Firs
t Pro
fess
iona
l Deg
rees
Con
ferr
ed b
y S
ex a
nd F
ield
of S
tudy
The
Uni
vers
ity o
f Uta
h19
70-7
1 T
hrou
gh 1
974-
75
5-Y
r.
1970
-71
1971
-72
1972
-73
1973
-74
1974
-75
Tet
e'. T
ete'
Maj
or F
ield
of S
tudy
MW
MW
MW
MW
MW
MW
Deg
rees
Low
(LL
B. o
r ID
.)-
971
113
414
86
114
811
9
Med
icin
e (M
.D.)
653
611
694
742
92
1 62
417
4)
521
7:
1011
810
=21
1
1759
136
62.5
%
536
115
37.5
%
2295
251
100.
0%
-1T
orsi
166
179
227
191
233
1,00
3
CO
Per
cent
age
Incr
ease
Ove
r
Pre
viou
s Y
ear
8.5%
7.8%
26.8
%12
.8%
17.7
%
The
Uni
vers
ity o
f Uta
h w
as th
e on
ly in
stitu
tion
awar
ding
firs
t pro
fess
iona
l deg
re4s
in th
eS
tate
of U
tah
this
yea
r.
Sou
rces
HE
GIS
Rep
orts
, 197
0-71
thro
ugh
1974
-75.
41k
TA
BLE
- 15
Uta
h S
yste
m o
f Hig
her
Edu
catio
n
Tot
al Y
early
Doc
tora
tes
Con
ferr
ed, U
tah
Pub
lic a
nd P
rivat
e In
stitu
tions
,'
1965
-66
Thr
otig
h 19
74-7
5, B
y A
rea
of S
tudy
Are
a of
Stu
dyA
gric
ultu
re &
Nat
ural
Res
ourc
esri
Arc
hite
ctur
e &
Env
ironm
enta
l Des
ign
Are
a S
tudi
es
. 1965
-66
1966
-67
1967
-68
1968
-69
1969
-70
, 1970
-71
.197
1-72
1972
-73
1973
-74
1974
-75
1521
1215
1324
-9
913
12
*1
1517
,15
.38
6049
7446
5239
12
42
27
717
6_V
t)
56
1t
___t
_-
.,
1,
454
7610
914
71
s84
213
168
204
1629
3343
4733
56-1
55 `
4137
421
34
21
114
79
102
'
12
47
9.3
25
465
.
11
76
42
22
.1
42
62
35
6
:, 6
54
J'6
819
'24
1914
13
,'
-26
111
64
176
7,
83
53
9-.
..
'44
4544
42-
64..
56--
45
40' 1
4041
t3=
15-
N..,
24
2132
1630
.24
132
341
,1
5'
86
9.
12`.
1219
2519
29.
2323
202
,2
i4
'3
15
82
91
,1
\22
721
724
731
541
3'
394
491
460
442
4111
Bio
logi
cal S
cieg
oils
Bus
ines
s &
Man
agem
ent
.:
Com
mun
icat
ions
\...
...1
ompu
ter
& In
form
atio
n S
cien
ces
\c.
....1
E u
catio
n44
En-
'rig
0F
ine
oohe
d A
rts
orei
gn L
anpa
ges
Hea
lth P
res
sion
s*H
ome
Eco
n m
ics
Law
*le
tters
Libr
ary
Sci
ence
's\
Mat
hem
atic
s\
Mili
tary
Sci
ence
s\
aP
hysi
cal S
cien
ces
Phy
chol
ogy
/P
ublic
Affa
irs &
Ser
Vic
esS
ocia
l Sci
eific
es /
The
olog
y/
'
Inte
rdis
cipl
inar
y S
tudi
es
TO
TA
\i
*Doe
s no
t inc
lude
firs
t pro
fess
iona
l deg
rees
.
Sou
rces
: Ins
tiTut
onal
rep
orts
to U
tah
Coo
rairt
atin
Cou
rfil
of H
ighe
r E
duca
tion,
196
5-66
thro
ugh
1966
-67
HE
GIS
Rep
orts
, 196
7-68
thro
ugh
1974
TA
BLE
16
Uta
h S
yste
m o
f Hig
her
Edu
catio
n
Tot
al M
aste
r's a
nd D
Oct
or's
De'
gre.
es A
war
ded
1974
-75
By
Maj
or F
ield
of S
tudy
and
Sex
.-r
qM
aste
r's-0
!1
Ir
1T
otal
t' W
est-
:T
otal
U o
f UU
SU
IP
ublic
min
tier
1B
YU
Tot
alU
of U
US
U'
Pub
lic'
Maj
orF
ield
of S
tudy
! M W
M W
'M W
MW
'M. W
M W
M W
M W
M W
-1--
-:
1---
-0.-
-1--
Agr
icul
ture
d N
atur
al R
esou
rces
t.1
0
Doc
tor's
.
Agr
icul
iure
, Gen
eral
,.-
--,
-D
airy
Sci
ence
-..
1
Nat
ural
Res
ourE
es M
anag
emen
tI
1
_Agr
onom
y_
BY
UT
otal
M W
'M W
---,
Sod
s S
cien
ceS
cien
ce.
99
Ani
mal
Sci
ence
2'
2t
-,--
.-_F
ish.
Gam
e, d
Wild
life
Man
agem
ent
-iro
rest
ry2
'2
ok"1
-'C
r-.
..
...A
gric
ultu
re d
For
estr
y T
echn
olog
yI
----
.R
ange
Man
agem
ent
----
--,..
10; 1
0
Agr
itu
ral E
cono
mic
st
11'
11
Agr
ic74
ural
Bus
ines
s--
t"7
--i-
,4-
Arc
ectu
red
EM
nron
men
tal D
esig
n.
Arc
hite
ctur
eLa
ndsc
ape
Arc
hite
ctur
e1-
FrE
on A
rchi
tect
ure
Are
a S
tudi
esLa
tin A
mer
ican
Stu
dies
Asi
an S
tudi
es. G
ener
alM
iddl
e E
aste
rn S
tud_
ies
Bio
logi
cal S
cien
ces
127
1-22
; 22
4I
14
r-3 j2
Bio
logy
, Gen
eral
Bot
any.
Gen
eral
12_
1
11
44
13
45
61
9
Bac
terio
logy
Pla
nt P
atho
logy
"TO
OT
°. G
ener
alho
rmac
olog
y, H
uman
dni
rnal
°Doe
st i
nclu
de fi
rst p
rofe
ssio
nal d
egre
es
7
1919
1
5i2
Maj
or F
ield
of S
tudy
Mic
robi
olog
y-A
noto
rny
-
Bio
chem
istr
yB
ioph
ysic
sE
otor
nOki
gyN
utrit
ionc
Sci
entif
ic"'
Tox
icol
ogy
Med
icin
al C
hem
istr
y,P
atho
logy
, Hum
an a
nd A
nim
alP
hysi
olog
y, H
uman
and
Ani
mal
Pla
nt P
hysi
olog
y
TA
BLE
1.1
(con
t.)
Mas
ter's
Tot
alW
est-
U o
f UU
SG
1P
ublic
min
stei
BY
UT
otal
U o
f UM
W M
W M
WIM
WIM
W M
V.is
ines
s -M
anag
emen
tA
ccou
ntin
gB
usin
ess
Man
agem
ent &
Adm
inis
trat
ion
l'`.-
4La
bor
& In
dust
rial R
elat
ions
Bus
ines
s E
cono
mic
sP
erso
nnel
Man
agem
ent
----
--G
rgan
tztii
onal
Beh
avio
r'
Bus
ines
s S
tatis
tics
I 3 -
37
US
U-.
M W
Doc
tor's
'
Tot
alPu
blic
BY
Uto
tal
M W
M W
M5 2
- -
)
-;"
--t
33
-4--
e-
*
1-4
.
I-t
--,-
122
1
122
+t
2133
9410
__T
33
"T3V
_10
166
.t. '
, 44,
.....
.,..b
___,
_
531
1138
011
166
---
81
;8
-1
'
,4
_:1,
121
37
1 53
7r-
-.
537
1i
14'
14t
.4
99
.
7
7---
--1-
9.
22
22
F.
2 2 3
--r
ripr1
-r.n
icat
ions
Com
miln
icat
ions
Gen
eral
Jour
nolis
m4
41
II
'14
CO
M P
OW
& In
farm
otio
n S
cien
ces.
Com
pute
r B
Info
rmat
ion
Sci
ence
s, G
ener
al-
81
-t
82
101
4
Edu
catio
nE
duca
tion,
Gen
erol
'Ele
men
tary
Edu
catio
n, G
ener
al26
5026
5027
568
68
66
37
66
4M
astit
is-
Doc
tor's
-
' IT
otal
T-W
est-
1
Tot
al 1
.
.
I' U
of U
US
UI
Pub
lic1
min
ste;
BY
UT
otal
,IU
of U
;U
SU
Pub
licI
BY
UI
Tot
al
Maj
or R
aid
of;
.S
tudy
I'1
---M
W M
W M
WIM
W M
VIM
iVIIM
W M
W M
WIM
WI M
W--
-- -
1--i-
,,.ti
_
Sec
onda
ry E
duca
tion,
Gen
eral
.1
65
.16
Juni
or d
. Com
mun
ity C
olle
ge
Spa
cial
Edu
catio
n, G
ener
al8
21 -
33
r 11
Spe
ech
Cor
rect
ion
913
'9
Dis
abili
ties
Spe
cial
eam
ihg
Soc
ial F
ound
atio
ns.- ,
22
-2
rE
duca
tiona
l Psy
chol
ogy
1518
-15
.
Edu
catio
nal A
dmin
istr
atio
n.,
195
1! 2
0C
urric
ulum
& In
stru
ctio
n.
1" iR
epdi
ng E
duca
tion
4T
33
Mus
ic E
duca
tion
Phy
sica
l Edu
catio
n-.
-777
79
' 3 7
63-
1' 1
5A
gric
ultu
ral E
duca
tion
IT-t
--td
ueat
ion
of E
xcep
tiona
l Chi
ldre
n,i
not c
lass
ified
abo
ve-
a,
i
Stu
dent
Per
sonn
el--
..,-
AdM
inis
trat
ion
of S
peci
al E
duca
t12,
0-i- ,-
-
'
...1
.1
raT
.icat
ion
of M
enta
lly R
etar
ded
\'-.
I_ 1
13
,-
Mat
hem
atic
s E
duca
tion
4.
1.4
\ --7
----
i"--
educ
atio
nal S
uper
visi
on1
',.-
_.In
stru
ctio
n S
ervi
ces
;-,,
15+
4-I
Pub
lic S
choo
l Adm
inis
trat
ion
.-,
, -..-
---
;--
+
Hea
lth E
dasa
tion
,.1
107
10S
-7-
,4-
,1-
Bus
ines
s, C
omm
erce
& D
istr
ibut
ive
Indu
stria
l Art
s, V
ocat
iona
l &E
duca
tion
.42
4.,
2
Tec
hnic
al E
duca
tion
-10
.10
,--,
-,-H
ome
E46
com
ics
Edu
catio
n.
Edu
catio
ncil
Med
iai
'
Rec
reat
ion
Edu
catio
nIn
stru
ctio
nal M
edia
,--
Cou
nsel
ing
& b
ui d
a n
c e
.0'
Com
mun
ity S
choo
l Lea
ders
hip
'C
urric
ulum
Dev
elop
men
t & S
uper
visi
on
bR
epre
sent
s a
Six
-yea
r C
ertif
icat
e
p
6'
166
.4
.,
__t_
29--
'-14
25
13
13'
--t-
-.
913
;I
2 1-
-.
'
5-
3--
12
-2-
53
188
5:
23 ,
2313
16
,13
\.,6
619
7
---'1
4_
'.
555,
7510
. 24
6.2
46
322 3
568 4 6
22..
17.
2217
101
101
234_
335
,
6.,
,
320
.-1
6'-1
'3
16 10
735
13' 1
1--
.7-
-
± -,-
- 52
752
106
311-
-11
.,._
918
'
2021
3
447
14
1--
-4-4
7-
-
5_.
..
7 -1 4
-
-
±-
'1
1°.
+
710
3 _L
3:
.,..,
83
12
T
---1
-
.13
23
I.
.
-
-1
41
-
111
11
a
,
TA
BLE
1e
(ten
t.)C
..M
aste
r'sD
ecto
r's
,T
otal
-Wes
t:T
otal
,.
U o
f UU
SU
Pub
licm
inte
r4Y
UT
otal
U o
f U ,
US
UP
ublic
BY
UT
otal
,M
aier
Fie
ld o
f tud
y'M
W.,M
W M
W. M
W M
W,M
W M
W M
W M
W M
W M
''WE
ngin
eerin
g,
..
Eng
inee
ring%
Gen
eral
24=
250
2515
15s
15,
A r
icul
tura
lne
erin
gB
iopa
gine
erin
g a
Bio
me
Ica
'E
ngin
eerin
gI
,,
5.1
52
-i
-2
Che
mic
al E
ngin
eerin
g,
-.6
144
1C
ivil,
Con
stru
ctio
n, a
n T
rans
-00
0rta
tion
Eng
inee
ring
221
,22
.118
40t.
1'
22
Efe
ctric
af, E
lect
roni
cs, a
naa
1..
.....
.T
`-
. Com
mun
icat
ions
Eng
inee
ring'
te 1
5'".
-722
,F 2
648
,- 6
'67
Mec
hani
cal E
ngin
eerin
g7
.10
1721
738
22
3*-
--G
eolo
gica
l Eng
inee
ring
11
11
_-1
,1'
Indt
Atr
ibl &
Man
agem
ent E
ngin
eerin
g31
/ 26
37*
237
,\
--,7
Mat
eria
lsIn
gine
erin
_g1
1.,
1'
33
.
Min
ing
and
Min
eral
Eng
inee
ring
,.,
'E
ngin
eerin
g M
echa
nics
.)d
'1
;.
Pet
role
um g
ngin
eter
ing
,;
-.'''s
,4
4o-
-C
eram
ic E
ngin
eerin
g`
.N
ucle
ar E
ngin
eerin
g ;
11
t. 1
1%
----
1
Eng
inee
ring
Adm
inis
trat
ion
_iI
..
'-
I
envi
ronm
enta
l -3
San
itary
Eng
inee
ring
i-
Man
ufac
turin
g E
ngin
eerin
g,
...I
Fue
ls E
n in
eerin
I
Soi
l Met
chtn
ics,
& F
ound
atio
n E
ngin
eerin
g__
Sira
tigra
lihy
& S
edim
enta
tion
',
Str
uctu
ral
__nk
igin
eeri
iin
& A
pp i
Art
i,
.,
-''
Art
(P
aint
ing,
Drb
win
g &
Scu
lur
e)6
131
22M
usic
(P
erfc
irmili
g, to
mpo
sitje
n, T
heor
y)-\
,44
11,
5us
ic--
-Rue
00,A
rms0
0g00
,00)
,,
,11
Mus
ic H
isto
ry &
App
reci
atio
n6
(Mus
icol
ogy)
"4-
-1
1T
Dra
mat
ic A
rts
88
610
318
94
34
32
Dan
ce'
22
2'2
22
App
lied
Des
ign
w4
Inte
rpre
tatio
n4
osD
esig
n,
.
Incl
udes
on;
-Mas
fer
ofilt
ildtip
hyde
gree
,.4:1
;ieh
th/e
q ui
vant
of-
a do
ctor
al d
eg-
ree
with
out a
dis
sert
atio
n, a
war
ded
in E
lect
rical
Eng
inee
ring.
Maj
or F
ield
of S
tudy
For
eign
Lor
Fga
bges
Fre
nch
Ger
man
.
Spa
nish
Latin
Ara
bic
Per
sian
Tur
kish
Rus
sian
Gre
ek C
lass
ical
Por
tugu
ese
Hea
lth P
rof e
lsio
ns, G
ener
alH
eol
thgr
oles
siop
s, G
ener
alN
ursi
ng (
Boc
eolo
ureo
te &
Hig
her
Pro
gram
s 1 .
Pha
rmac
y
00P
ublic
Hea
lth-
e1
'
t
Vet
erin
ary
Med
icin
e S
peci
alts
st
(Wor
k B
eyai
nd F
irst p
rofe
ssio
nal
degr
ee, D
VM
)-
Spe
ech
Pot
holo
gy &
Aud
i,olo
gy.-
--15
lI
6 -
15t-
1--,
---
-H
ospi
tal P
harm
ocyj
iP
harm
acy
Adm
inis
trat
ion
tIM
edic
inof
,Che
mis
try
r.
.
-Med
ical
1.-
o-b'
orot
ory
TeW
r;16
ltogi
es'
-71
-- 7
1'-i
-+
.-T
---
Ane
sthe
siol
ogy
--,
2.T
Hom
en
)H
ome
Eco
nom
ics,
Gen
eral
.
t-4,
--o
r
CI-
othi
ng &
01-e
xtile
s.
, .T
T
..I-
..
1
Con
sum
er E
cono
mic
s &
Hom
e M
onag
erne
nt,
.
1-1
8..,
i1
,0'
18
Fam
ily R
e164
ons
& C
hild
Dem
etop
men
ttr
-17
rr 0
71;
1611
Foo
ds e
Nut
ritio
n,
t o.
26
____
__i
5lk
7
',TA
BLE
16
(con
t1/2
t-M
oste
es--
-T-r
rT
I \ '
1
4,
Tot
ili
Wes
t-U
of U
iU
SU
,P
ul, i
s,
min
ster
:B
YU
,T
otal
U o
f U
MW
1611
W,'M
W,M
W M
W'M
VV
V;R
it W
1
21
i
'
2 rl
i
Doc
tor's
52
I
33
Ls
25
-
\ - 4 \
.
-4-
-t--2
r2
14
AL
;,,
7\i.
,-i
104
- 13
7
\..
---
t--
i1
i'
-1--
-
--i-
-\
01
it'
t, +-
-
1.
BY
U \
Tot
alW
' M W
3
254 i
4,
c,
--F. r
0+
t-i
: i--
- -
4
a.
't2
Lette
riG
ener
al11
313
13
1216
.I6
15
1821
1
I
3
71
16
a"
oac
1T
AB
LE 1
6 (c
ont.)
Mas
ter's
'D
octo
r's.
.,
,M
ajor
Fie
ld o
f Stu
dy4
U o
r U
M ,I
N
.
' US
UM
WT
otal
Pub
lilM
WW
est-
min
ster
MIN
:
'BY
UH
MW
Tot
al-
M W
I i
U o
f UI M
W
-
.1:5
US
UM
W'
Tot
al4,
Pub
licM
WB
YU
M W
7
Tot
alM
WLi
tera
ture
, Enp
lish
'7. ,
.
Com
para
tive
Lite
ratu
re-
.2
2.,
e.:
-H-
I--
I2
1
Ling
uist
ics
-,.
32
.58
24
Spe
ech,
Deb
arte
& F
oren
sic'
Sci
eace
,1-
35,
-++
+3
1'
8.1
,
.P
hilo
soph
y-'
'1,
,1
4_1
...-
--,-
-Li
tera
ture
, Aw
eric
an7.
-7
1-,-
1-t
+ 1
--+
- 5-
Tea
chin
g of
Eng
lish
as a
For
eign
Lan
g_ua
g_el
.±
46°
46
'-'-
1
It,.
'Lib
rary
Sci
ence
-
Libr
arY
Sci
ence
, Gen
eral
'..
'26
4,
26I
, 26
' 26
-In
stru
ctid
hol M
edia
.,I
6*
I' '
51
-,i-
_,,_
Mat
hem
atic
sM
athe
mat
ics,
Gen
eral
..'.
,'
t11
2!
169
'Sta
tistic
s M
ath
iraat
ical
& T
heor
etic
ol,
9:-
96
I'
151
r.
'P
hysi
cal S
'cie
aces
Phy
sica
l Sci
ence
s, G
ener
al.
,
Phy
sics
, Gen
eral
22
91
111
41.
31
2-
19
2N
Nuc
lear
Phy
sics
,
\Che
mis
try,
Gen
eral
36
-r--
-12
17
191
Irl'a
rgan
ic C
hem
istr
y--
..-+
-
Org
anic
Che
mis
try
r2
2I
2...
......
.....i
....i
_Phy
sica
l Che
mis
try
-
1.'
Ata
ric S
tri
--t-
--a
tes-
&__
_Z,_
....,
41
7.-
72
Geo
ogy
',
48
11
152
33
Geo
phys
ics
& S
eism
olog
y3
3'
'II.if
firn
iMi
Pal
eont
olog
X.
,.
Met
allu
rgy
f.4
''-
4M
illIM
IIM
EIM
E11
1011
.11.
1111
11.M
.11
2-
Min
eral
ogy
'W
MIC
IMM
1111
1116
1111
1M
IMM
ME
NE
MM
Ei
MIN
INI1
1111
1111
1A
cous
tics
,A
stro
phys
ics
-
Sol
id S
tate
PhY
si?'
s'
-.
1111
.67
MIIM
YIIH
EIII
MIII
IIIIII
MS
ace
Ph
,...C
sIII
!°I
ncks
i:les
one
Six
;yea
r C
e fif
idat
e.
Maj
orki
eld
of S
tudy
tS
pace
& P
lane
tary
,Phy
sics
Ear
th S
cien
ces,
Gen
eral
Psy
chol
ogy
.P
sych
olog
y, G
ener
alC
linic
al P
sych
olog
yP
sych
olog
y fo
r C
ouns
elin
g(P
sych
olog
y M
ars
Onl
y)S
ocia
l Psy
chol
ogy.
{S
choo
l Psy
_c_
holo
gy
Pub
lic A
ffairs
& S
ervi
ces
Pub
lic A
dmin
istr
atio
ntic
plW
ork
& H
elpi
ngSe
rvic
esC
orte
nuni
tyer
vice
s, G
ener
aTS
ocia
l SZ
ienc
e3O
I Sci
ence
s, G
ener
al.
Ant
hrop
olog
y,
TA
BLE
16
(con
t.)
Mas
tar'i
,-
1-!
'!
Tot
al.
Wes
t-
U o
f U:
US
U,
Pub
litm
inst
er
RA
wi o
nvi
, m.,w
htW
58
&17
11
-
BY
UT
otal
'U
of U
,U
SU
M 1
WM
W M
W, M
----
7D
octo
r s
Tot
al1
Pub
lic!W
UT
otal
M W
M W
M W
1 219
119
481
48 584
.4-
318
S11
295
1
.,-
4-
1.1
r,..
1
2
.C
.,...)
.E
cono
mic
s4
21,
-`
11
53
,7
37
11
2-t
---
,7
7
7,,1
41
112
1
-"-
153
2I
22
14
1
leis
tory
.--
4-.-
---
,
Geo
gsap
hl7
71
14
-F17
2 44
'iP
oliti
cal S
cien
ce .
Gov
ernm
ent
2f-
10
2 -1
---
'7
t,
.1-
t--
-I--
.8
219
3' 1
23
Soc
iolo
gy4
'4
2
Arc
haeo
logy
.
4-a-
-
The
olog
y4
Rel
igio
us E
duca
tion
r4
Anc
ient
S
chur
chD
.ctr
ine
Inte
rsc
nte
les
Hum
aniti
es &
Soc
ial S
ervi
ces
_rt
2
Tot
al77
7 27
2 30
5 70
1,04
937
5
1,08
2 34
2
1,42
4
670
176
846
76
262
59 1
4020
402
321
160
481
Sou
rAes
: HE
GIS
Rep
ort;
1974
-75.
AB
LE '1
7
Uta
h S
iste
m a
Hig
her
Edu
catio
n
Deg
rees
and
Aw
ards
Bas
ed o
n Le
ss T
han
Fou
r Y
ears
of W
ork,
Bey
ond
Hig
h S
choo
l By
Inst
itutio
n, 1
974-
75
.C
urric
ulum
U 6
f UU
SU
WS
CI ; S
US
C
,
Sno
w
174
Dix
ie
255
CE
U
:83
rU
TC
!'U
TC
Pro
vo !S
altta
ke r. .24
1
j! W
est-
Tot
al!
!min
ster
Pub
lic' B
YU
I Col
lege
i I
968
568
LDS
-Bus
.
Col
l.
.
Ste
vens
-
Hen
ager
Col
lege
Tot
alP
rivat
e-
.,
568
Tot
al -
Pub
licP
rivat
e
1753
6
CU
RR
ICU
LUM
S O
F T
WO
OR
MO
RE
YE
AR
SB
UT
LE
SS
TH
AN
FO
UR
YE
AR
S
Wor
k w
holly
or
chie
fly c
redi
tabl
eto
war
d'a
bach
elor
's d
egre
e%
Ass
ocia
te d
egre
e11
1+
..-I
341
' ,34
1
Oth
er fo
rmal
rec
ogni
tion
14.-
,;
62r
_-
.--
- ,
-.
76_:
-.
_L_
--
76T
otal
1411
1' 6
21)
4.23
5'
8324
'.
1,04
4 i 5
6856
81.
612
Wor
k no
t who
lly o
r ch
iefly
cre
dita
ble
tow
ard
a ba
chel
or's
deg
ree
Ass
ocia
te d
egre
e22
1318
0' 15
737
2 ;
c 12
439
157%
529%
Oth
er fo
rmal
rec
ogni
tion
710
189
136
,35
1 '
''
135
1T
otal
'29
1013
369
293.
'
723
:t.7,
'
1,76
756
8':
'
o--
-
1,24
33
124
.33
157
725
880
2,49
2
Tot
al c
urric
ulum
s of
two
orm
ore
year
s1
41
1 r
350
6220
324
596
393
i29
3
CU
RR
ICU
LUM
S O
F A
T L
EA
ST
ON
E Y
EA
RB
UT
LE
SS
PH
AN
TW
O Y
EA
RS
3f-'
6740
'45
127:
416
727'
, 76
4612
284
9
CU
RR
ICU
LUM
S O
F L
ES
S T
HA
I ON
EY
EA
R'S
DU
RA
TIO
N57
0
1
70,
1,03
1
c\
,;I
7;56
11,
349
I
4,80
6 I
.7: 93
4.
143
-...
240
.5,
Dot
al a
ll cu
rric
ulum
s of
less
than
four
yea
rs b
eyon
d hi
gh s
choo
l
A
4611
11,
987
102
o.
203
315
i i2,
05`7,
300
566
93 1
204
222
1,08
7
.
8,31
37
Sou
rces
: RE
GIS
Rep
orts
, 197
4-75
rA
dden
da p
repa
red
by th
e O
ffice
of t
he C
omm
issi
oner
for
the
RE
GIS
Rep
orts
, 197
4-75
.e.
N
2
TA
BLE
18
Uta
h S
yste
m o
f Hig
her
Edu
catio
n
Ass
ocia
te D
egre
es C
onfe
rred
, Uta
h P
ublic
and
Priv
ate
Inst
itutio
ns,
1966
-67
Thr
ough
197
4-75
, By
Inst
itutio
n
1966
-67
1967
-68
1968
-69
1969
-70
1970
-71
1971
-72
1972
-73
1973
-74
1974
-75
Sys
tem
Intu
tions
.'
Uni
vers
ityU
tah
161
216
,.
12
fiU
tatiS
t.n
iver
sity
°.
.11
1
Web
erat
e C
olle
ge14
112
314
818
320
225
8^'
271
324
3,41
Sou
the
Uta
h S
tate
Col
lege
Sno
Wlie
ge12
913
719
021
116
919
2'
135
169
cl,
196
Dix
ie a
llege
180
187
233
260
222
242
235
Col
le
of E
aste
rn U
tah
131
143
143
139
166
107
4
8796
,Ut
'Tec
hnic
al C
olle
ge a
t Pro
vo22
8210
299
114
138
175
204
Uta
h T
echn
ical
Col
lege
at S
alt L
ake
168
198.
207
152
:14
911
31
157
Tot
ojs
for
syst
em in
stitu
tions
.59
861
3'
942
1,02
61
065
1,14
31,
034
1,11
0.
1.34
0
Yea
rly
perc
enta
ge in
crea
se31
.7%
2.5%
53.6
%8.
9%ed
3.8%
7.3%
-9.5
%-7
.4%
20.7
%
Priv
ate
Inst
itutio
ns:
-__
, ...
Brig
ham
You
ng U
nive
rsity
.17
918
915
015
2:22
423
5,
350
400
......
,...5
613.
LDS
Bus
ines
s C
olle
geb
4260
7474
911
lidlit
Ste
vens
Hen
ager
Col
lege
5579
81,
117
9697
137
33
Tot
als
for
priv
ate
inst
itutio
ns27
632
8"30
53.
4341
145
060
3 ' '
450
725
Yea
rfe
incr
ease
26.6
%18
.8%
-7.0
%12
.5%
19.8
%9.
5%34
.0%
-25,
4%61
.1%
Tot
al A
ssoc
iate
deg
rees
aw
arde
d in
Uta
h87
494
11,
247
1,36
91,
476
1,59
31,
637
1,56
02.
065
Yea
rly p
erce
nt in
crea
se fo
r-al
l Uta
h in
stitu
tions
30.1
%, ,
7.7
%32
.5%
,.9.
8%7.
8%7.
9%2.
8%"
-4.7
%32
.4%
.
,..
° N
o A
ssoc
iate
deg
rees
wer
e of
fere
d at
Uta
h S
tate
Uoi
tver
sity
prio
r to
the
1974
-75
acad
emic
yea
r.
b T
igU
res
for-
the
LDS
Bus
ines
s C
olle
ge w
ere
not a
vaila
ble
for
the
1973
-.74
aca
dem
ic y
ear:
Sou
rces
: Ins
titut
iona
l rep
orts
t6 U
tah
Coo
rdin
atin
g C
ounc
il of
Hig
her
Edu
catio
n, 1
966-
67.
,",
HE
GIS
Rep
orts
, 196
7-68
thro
ugh
1974
-75.
TABLE 19
Utah System of Higher Education'
Degrees and Awards Based on loss f'han Four Yeartof Work Beyond High School'Curriculums of Two of More BO Less Than Four Years
Work Wholly or Chiefly Creditable Toward a Bachelor's Degree, 1974-75
U of U USU WSC SUSC SNOW
CurriculumsAssoc.
Doom*
OM*,FormalRome-notion
Assoc.Docirim
OtherFormalfloc.q.notion
Assoc.Dogrel"
OtherFormalRomp-nitiOn
#Asoc.Dorms
OtherFormalRocas-&Nob
A
Assoc.Degree
OtherFormalRecoil.nition
ARTS AND SCIENCE ORGENERAL PROGRAMS, NOTORGANIZED AS OCCUPATIONALCURRICULUMS
Total Section 1 87 174
SCIENCEOR ENGINEERING/RELATED ORGANIZED OCCUPATIONAL CURRICULUM ATTHE TECHNICAL OR SEMI-PROFESSIONAL LEVELDCita Processing Technologies
Data Processing Technologies.General` 1
10
A2
Health Services and PuromegicalTechnologiesRodiologic Technologies
.17--
Nursing, R N , .
Inholotion Therapy Technologies
_
20
Medical of Biological LaboratoryAssistant Technologies .
__ .
-. ,
Radiologic Technologies.,Nursing, R.N. less than 4.yrInhalation Therapy Technologies"
Mechanicol and EngineeringTechnologiesMechanical and Engineering
Technologies, General o 1T 26Aeronautical and Aviation
TechnologiesA
24
10
.
Engineering Graphics .
Architectural DraftingTechnologies
I
Fe
I a2
.
ChemicaiTechnologies
Automotive Techncilogies , 1
Civil Technologies_
Construction BuildingTechnologies .
Metal Fabrication Technologies
.
v- 3
9_
A.
Diesel Technologies.-
2
1
--+
Mechanicaliechnologtes.
3
Traffic Engineering.
Electronics Machine Technologies, ' 0 a --.
Natural Science Technologies
.
Agnculturol Technologies 42 -
.1
186
.
____ __Home Econamics Technologiei
'Sdnitotion & Public Health'Inspection Technologies
Family Studies
1;Total Section 2 14 29.
,
____.
DIXIE
-.___
CEU UTC/Provo TOTAL P RUC 5"U , TOTAL
Assoc.Degree
Other_
FormalRecoil-ninon
.
Assoc.Dpree
OtherFormalRecap.,nitIon
-FormalAssoc.Degree
Other
Recoil-nition
Assoc.Dogma
herFo alNet -nit{ n
Assoc.Dore.
OtherFormalRomp.nitIon
Assoc,Degree
OtherFormalRecog-.nitlon
L
216 83 24 584 :
I_.,_ 4-
°10 10
161 161
7 7
15
114I
15
114
20
28
'20
28'
3
.
27,
i-
1
-!
1 77I-
14 I 15
, 4+
I
3 ,
-I-9 2
I
1- 2 9''R
-t--,7
i, .
, 2 2
'
9
- '-..15
-.
42
7
30 2 17 3
1 42
,
1 i
62 62
10 298 43 230 528 43
17f
TABLE 19 Cont.)
U of U USU WSC SUSC-<:t
SNOW
Curriculumsr
AssocDegree
OtherformatRecog-notion
AssocDegree
OtherformalRecog-°Ilion
Assoc.Degree.
OtherFormalRecog-nition
Assoc.Degree
OtherFormatRecognition
Assoc.Degree
...
OtherFormatRecog.nifion
-
Mechanical and EngineeringTechnologiesMethanical and Engineering
Technologies, General 26 2Aeronautical and Aviation
Technologies
--i
'
' 14
24
10
.Engineering Graphics
Architectural DraftingTechnologies 2
Chemical Technologists
Automotive Technologies. . _ _
Civil Technologies
Construction BuddingTechnologies
Metal fabrication Technologies
3
42
I
102
.._
1
.-
IS
186
9
7
__ _ _ .___ _
Diesel Technologies rMechanical Tchnologies
'
29
Traffic Engc rering
Electronics Machine Technologies.--Natural Science Technologies
A'gricultural Technologies
Home Economics Technologies'-....-
Sanitation 6 Public HealthInspection`Tchnolowes
family Studies
Total Section 2
Sources: HEGIS Reports, 1974-75.
". K-9172
C,.
t
DIXIE CEU UTC Provo TOTAL PUBLIC BYU TOT)111.
AssocDegree
OtherFormalRcog.maim
Assoc.Degree
OtherFormalRcognition
,Assoc,Degree
OtherFormalRcci!nition
Assoc.Degree
OtherFormalRecap-ninon
Assoc.'Degree
OtherFormat',scot.ninon
,
AssocDegree
OtherFormalRcognitron
1 44
i 5
--t
1___ .27 , 271y- .-i-,-42 8 67 109
4
4'- 1
..,
f--I--4.-
.,
20 20
.___.-
,tt
1 16' 5
.._
,,
L .
1
___ _/ ,
9---- .-i-
24
.
86 33 ' 80 166 33
235._,
83tl 968 76 568 , 1.536 76
ca 01.
9 2 -
73
er
Ls,
TABLE 20
Utah System of Higher Education
Degrees and Awards amid on Less Tharifour Years of Work Beyond High SchoolCurriculums of Two or Moro But Leis Than Four Years
Work Not Wholly or Chiefly Creditable Toward A Bad,. lor's Degree, 1974-75
Curriculums
ARTS AND SCIENCE ORGENERAL PROGRAMS, NOTORGANIZED ASOCCUPATIONAL CUR
Total Sidicin
SCIENCE OR ENGINEERING-RELATED ORGANIZED OCCU-PATIONAL CURRICULUMS ATTHE TECHNICAL OR SEMI-PROFESSIONAL LEVEL
Doto Processing Technologie
Doto Protessing Technolo esGeneral'
Compyter ProgromrttePTeateologies
Health Services °ad ParamedicalTechnologiei
Rodiologic Technologies
Nursing, Practical (LPN or INN)
Psychiatric Technologies
Medical Assistant itofficfechnologies
U of U
OtherFirma
Assoc. R
Dogrel'
Snow
OtherFormalRompninon
CEU
OtherFormalRecog-nition
., Mechanical & EngineeringTeclinciio{ites iv
---s--Mechanical & Engineering
Technologies, GeneralAeronautical& Aviation t i'-
TechnologiesEngineering Graphics .--'t
Araldecturol DraftingTechnologies ' ,
,-, rAutorrotive,Technologies
Dwel TethnologsesMelding TeAnologiesElectronics & Mach's,*
Technologies
Electromechanical Technologies
.--. Instrumentation TechslogiesMechcricol TechnologiesCdnstruction & Building
Technolo
--`Sies
brahng & }i g n
lechnologi sC yil Engneeri
er Instrument RepoirElectrical &-TIstrumentofon
Techno4logies
Mochirte ShogiMinj6gTechnAlogy
isoturdr ScienEe TechnologiesArgiculture Technologies
/ Home Economics Technologies
Total 'Section 2-
IP
4 f
.51"
44,-*
-1
2
2
_L_8 7 2
- 93,74, rt
T8 8
rn
/
/ UTC-Provo UTC-Salt Lake Total Public s Bus. Coll
Other , 1 Other 1 Othe Other, Formal so . Formal Fo l Formal
Dept..' nition *spree nition Dogr nition Dow.. nitionAssoc. Recog- Assoc. . Rap- Assoc. *cog- i, Assoc. ,Recog-
12
4
Stovegs-Fliingr.Other
4iio . ogFormal
As Rec-D re. '. nition
Tot') Private 1 Total All
., I. Other 1 0,i Formal; Fo
Assoc. Rap -, Assoc. ReDegree nation : Degree n'
hermal:p-ion
t
_
20
'14
1,
/72
33
13
'14
28 5 31 9 63
23 22 3 49
1 0 8 1 6 I I 26
8 3 7 64 , I I
2.-,--..
8 33
6
s
16 55 ?7 29 33 86
13 4 13 4
I 6I
A
4-105 : 154 -4-- 102 103 ; 222-4- 275 " 8
4-
I I
2
TJ 4 iT
33
75
r. 230 275
N
TABLEP20 (Cont.)
u of kJ 1 WSC
OtherFormal j
Assoc. ' Assoc., I
Curriculurris , Dow** nition DevoeNO CIENCE & NON -ENGINEERING- RELATEDORGANIZED OCCUP,ATIONALCURRICULUMS AT THETECHNICAL OR VMIPROFESSIONAt LEVELBiisiness & Commerce.
TechnologiesBusiness & Commerce
Snow. Dixie CEU
OtherFormal!stag-nition
OtherFormal
Assoc. Recoil- Assoc.Dogtoe nition Degree
OtherFormalRecoil-nition
Technologies, Goner& j 1
Accounting Technologies
Morketing, Distribution, Purchafing, Business, & Indus.triol MoilogementTechnologies
Sicretoriol TechnologiesPersonol Service TeclrologiesPhotogrophy TechndlogiesCommunicotions S'Brood-
coitivgTechnologiet'.'(Roclio,Television N'ews)
Printingl LithocirophyTechdolOgies
Hotelt Restouront Monoge;theniTechnologies
Tronsportotion & Public UtilnyApplied Arts, Graphic Arts,
& Fine Arts TechnologiesAgribusiness
Clericol Technologies
Totol Section 3
-Totol Sections I, 2,8. 3 j
Sources: HEGIS Reports, 1974-75.
1 10
9
Lt
OtherFormal
Assoc. liecop-Dow.. nition
1
2
10 13
7
;6tt
*.
UTC-rovo UTC-Sa blabs To
Other Other
Public__Other
Formal Formal Formal'Assoc. Roc Assoc. **cog- Assoc. Rocog-Dow** nition Degree nition Dogroe nition
g .
19 7
24.
26
2
26
47
2
6
19
nu
tps Bus. Coll.. Stevens-Henlr.
Other OtherFormal Formal
Assoc. Recoil- Assoc. Recoil-Doors* nition Degree nition
25-
1 41 4
7
21 8 " 21
4
75 35 55 33 150
--i80 1 189- 157 t 136 372
/
.40
38
76 116
351 124,
15
8
10
Total Private
OtherFormal
Assoc. **cogDegree nition
53
48
48
Total All
OtherFormal
Assoc. ItocegaDegresi nition
4972 7
73' 2
89
149
157
4
8 214
2
299 76
529 351
7i-T
AB
LE 2
1
.2-
Uta
h S
yste
m o
f Hig
her
Edu
catio
n
Aw
ards
Bas
ed o
n Le
ss. T
han
Fou
r Y
ears
of W
oik
Sec
ond
Hig
h S
choo
l.
Cur
ricul
ums
of A
t Lea
st O
ne-Y
ear,
But
Les
s T
han
Fou
r Y
ears
, 197
4.75
o
4,
Cur
ricul
ums
U o
f UW
SC
SU
SC
-...
Sno
wD
ixie
?C
EU
UT
CP
rove
UT
CS
alt L
ake
Pub
licT
otal
LDS
BuS
ines
iC
olle
ge
Ste
vens
Hen
ager
Col
lege
Tat
a)P
rivot
e
Tbt
alP
ublic
8.
Priv
ate
AR
TS
AN
D S
CIE
NC
E O
R. G
EN
ER
AL
PR
OG
RA
MS
NO
T O
RG
AN
IZE
D A
SO
CC
UP
AT
ION
AL
CU
RR
ICU
LUM
S
-
.
-,-
-%
Tot
al, S
octie
rs 1
SC
IEN
CE
OR
EN
GIN
EE
RIN
G R
ELA
TE
DO
RG
AN
IZE
D O
CC
UP
AT
ION
AL
CU
RR
I-C
ULU
MS
AT
TH
E T
EC
HN
ICA
L O
RS
EM
I-P
RO
FE
SS
ION
AL
LEV
EL
Dat
a P
foce
ssin
g T
echn
olog
ies
Dat
a P
roce
ssin
g T
echn
olog
ies,
Gen
eral
4o
.
_
'22
.v
- t1
-
2, H
ealth
Ser
vice
s an
d P
aram
edic
alT
echn
olog
ies
.
Den
tal A
ssis
tant
Tec
hnol
ogie
s13
3851
- .
.
51
radi
olog
ical
Tec
hnct
,logi
esN
ursi
ng, P
ract
ical
2870
7620
824
e
_Med
ical
ssis
tant
&O
ffice
Tec
hnol
ogie
s19
1919
Sur
gica
l Tec
hnol
ogie
s16
16r
16
Mec
hani
cal &
Eng
inee
ring
Tec
hnol
ogie
sA
eron
autic
al a
nd A
viat
ion
Tec
hnol
ogie
se
-
Eng
inee
ring
Gra
phic
sA
utom
otiv
e T
echn
olog
ies
12.
15-
15
Wel
dine
echn
olog
ies
44
4
Ele
ctro
nics
and
Mac
hine
Tec
hnol
ogie
s2
_3
e-
Inst
rum
enta
tion
Tec
hnol
ogie
s1
11
Arc
hite
ctur
al D
rafti
ng T
echn
olog
ies
'6
Sm
all E
ngin
e R
epai
r.
Die
sel T
echn
olog
ies
Mec
hani
cal T
echn
olog
ies
-46
46,
E
0
TA
BLE
21
7CO
NT
.1
"Cur
ricul
ums
U o
f UW
SC
SU
SC
Sno
wD
ixie
CE
U
UT
CP
rovo
1U
TC
Sal
l Lak
eP
ublic
Tot
al ,
LDS
liusi
ness
Col
lege
Ste
vens
Hen
ager
Col
lege
Tot
alP
rivat
e
Tot
alP
ublic
&P
rivat
e
Dra
fting
& D
esig
n T
echn
olog
ies
813
Met
al F
abric
atio
n T
echh
olog
ies.
1..
11
Con
stru
ctio
n an
d B
uild
ing
Tec
hnol
ogie
si
...9
108
117
117
Mac
hine
Sho
pt s
.'
..
Aut
o,B
ody
Rep
air
&P
aint
Min
e*ec
hani
csT
otal
; Sec
tion
255
2028
127
268
498
498
NO
NS
CIE
CE
AN
D N
ON
EN
GIN
EE
RIN
Gr
RE
LAT
Ell
FtG
AN
IZE
D O
CC
UP
AT
ION
AL
CU
RR
ICU
LUM
AT
TH
E T
EC
HN
ICA
LO
R S
EM
I - P
RO
FE
SS
ION
AL
LEV
EL
Bus
ines
s an
d C
omm
erce
Tec
l:Mol
ogie
sB
usin
ess
and
Com
mer
ce T
echn
olog
ies
Gen
eral
...,..
.1
'
..
t1
... 1-
,
1
Acc
dunt
ing
Tec
hnol
ogie
s
'19
1918
725
44
Mar
ketin
g, D
istr
ibut
ion,
Pio
chas
ing,
Bus
ines
s, a
nd In
dust
rial M
anag
emen
t
Tec
hnol
ogie
s
.]
117
113
.
18
Sec
reta
rial T
echn
olog
ies
'32
434
9858
39-9
719
5
Per
sona
l Ser
vice
Tec
hnol
ogie
s.
s7
,64
79' 7
9
Prin
ting
and
Lith
ogra
phy
Tec
hnol
ogie
s14
141
Pub
lic S
ervi
ce R
elat
ed T
ech/
It:44
esP
rofe
ssio
nal D
rivin
g'
t-
Tot
al, S
ectio
n 3
.c-3
212
-20
1714
822
97&
4612
235
1
Tot
al, S
ectio
ns 1
, 2, &
3a2
6740
4512
741
672
776
4612
284
9
Sou
rces
: HE
W, R
epO
rts,
197
4-75
.
TA
BLE
22
Uta
h S
yste
m o
f Hig
her
Edu
catio
n
For
mal
Rec
ogni
tion
for
Sho
rt-c
ours
e C
ompl
etio
ns o
f Les
s th
an O
ne Y
ear's
Dur
atio
nP
ublic
and
Priv
ate
Inst
itutio
ns, 1
974-
75
Cur
ricul
ums
WS
CD
ixie
CE
U .
UT
CP
rovb
UT
CS
alt t
ake
Pub
lic.
Jot
al
Wes
t-m
inst
erC
olle
ge
J.D
SB
usin
ess
Col
lage
-
Ste
vens
Hen
ager
Col
lege
Tot
alP
rivat
e
'Tot
alP
ublic
&P
rivat
e
AR
TS
AN
D S
CIE
NC
E O
R-
GE
NE
RA
L P
RO
GR
AM
S, N
OT
OR
G'Z
ED
AS
OC
CU
PA
TIO
NA
L C
UR
RIC
ULU
MS
ie:
.
..
Tot
al, S
ectio
n 1
(,.-
SC
IEN
CE
-OR
EN
GIN
EE
RIN
G R
ELA
TE
D O
RG
AN
IZE
DO
CC
UP
AT
ION
AL
CU
RR
ICU
LUM
SD
ata
Pro
cess
ing
Key
punc
h O
pera
tor
& O
ther
Inpu
t Pre
para
tion
121
I12
14
412
5B
asic
Com
pute
r C
once
pts
-C
obol
Pro
gram
min
g...
Hea
lth S
ervi
ces
& P
aram
edic
alN
ursi
ng (
Nur
se's
Aid
e)21
,,,14
2,16
316
3H
ospi
tal W
ard
Cle
rk.e
3838
38O
pera
ting
Roo
m T
echn
icia
n15
1515
Firs
t Aid
Rad
iolo
gic
(X-
ray,
etc
.)M
edic
al T
erm
inol
ogy
4141
,41
_
Med
icat
ion
Cou
rse
,20
2020
,P
harm
acol
ogy
c?26
2450
50G
eria
ide
Tra
inin
g P
rogr
am17
217
2,
172
'Par
amed
ic T
rain
ing
Pro
gram
1818
T18
Mec
hani
cal a
nd E
ngin
eerin
g.
Aut
omot
ive
s36
:.-36
...-
36D
iese
l4
46..
Wel
ding
.54
..26
8080
Ele
ctro
mec
hani
cal
4040
40k,
stru
men
totio
nM
echa
nica
l.
3939
39..-
Eng
inee
ring
Gra
phic
s'
..--'
Arc
hite
ctur
al D
rafti
ng12
1212
Che
mic
al (
incl
udes
Pla
stic
s)95
9595
TA
KE
22i
(C
ON
t)
,
Cur
ricul
ums
.....
WS
CD
ixie
CE
U
UT
Cro
voU
TC
Sal
t Lak
eP
ublic
Tot
al
Wes
tm
inst
rel.
Col
lege
LDS
Bus
ines
s
Col
lege
Ste
vens
Ren
eger
Col
lege
Tot
alP
rivat
e
Nat
alP
ublic
&P
rivat
e,.
I Dre
iie
1212
12
Met
allu
r.M
anuf
actu
rin A
lica
tions
OS
HA
ei-
Aer
onau
tical
& A
viat
ion
I9
99
Civ
il E
ngig
eerin
g (s
urve
ing
phot
ogra
mm
etry
, etc
.i
1010
10
Dra
ftin
-..
381
3838
.
Mac
hine
Ope
rato
r30
1.
3030
Mat
eria
l Han
dler
7811
1-
7B78
Con
stra
ctio
n &
Bui
ldin
.28
1.
339
620
620
Aut
o M
echa
nics
for
Wom
en11
1
Min
e F
orem
an'6
06
60
Paw
er-S
ewin
!15
104
119
119
Sol
id S
tate
'I. '
35
,'
Ubo
lste
ring
Hig
hway
Eng
inee
ring
Tec
hnic
ian
INIII
IMA
IIIM
EM-MI
MI
50M
ine
Ele
ctric
iD
rivE
duca
tion
MII
Pai
ntin
& In
terio
r D
ecor
atio
nM
IME
Coa
l Mal
inP
ree
Im
ent
106
106
Min
e M
echa
nics
ME
C=
20-
20
Min
e R
escu
e-
1010
Min
e S
afet
y78
578
578
5
Nat
ural
Sci
ence
Hom
emak
er A
de
Tra
inin
g49
4949
Tot
al, S
ectio
n 2
859
201,
031
451,
016
2,97
14
42,
975
iCIO
NS
CIE
NC
E-A
ND
NO
NE
NG
INE
ER
ING
-RE
LAT
Eb
OR
GA
NIZ
ED
OC
CU
PA
TIO
NA
L C
UR
RIC
ULU
MS
Bus
ines
s .&
Com
mer
ceB
usin
ess
& C
omm
erce
Gen
eral
IMIIM
MIE
NIII
IIIIM
IIIM
/111
1A
ccou
ntin
g17
198-
198
1717
Ban
king
& F
inan
ceM
arke
ting;
Dis
trib
utio
n, P
urch
asin
g, B
usin
ess.
Indu
stria
l; T
rans
orta
tion.
; 5 te
ms,
Mid
dle,
and
Mot
ivat
ion
Mon
a em
ent
153
153
153
Ste
TA
BLE
22
(CO
NT
.)
.1
Cur
ricul
ums
-
WS
CD
ixie
CE
U
UT
CP
rNt
UT
CS
alt L
ake
Pub
lie
Tot
el',,
kolle
gis
Wes
tm
inte
rW
Sik
aine
ssC
ello
Ste
vens
Han
ger
Col
lege
Tot
alP
rivat
e
Tot
alP
ublic
&P
rivet
*
Sec
reta
rial
255
.25
573
7332
8
Per
sona
l Ser
vice
"1-
211r
2929
Pho
togr
attih
ir.:
1010
10
Com
mun
icat
ions
& B
rood
ccis
ting
.P
rintin
g &
Lith
ogra
phy,
'.
Hot
el &
Res
taur
am M
anai
tem
ent
..
Str
pteg
y of
Wor
king
with
,Ib'
eopl
e'''-
'`',
\163
Rea
l Est
ate
Sal
esm
ansh
ip &
Bro
kera
ge5C
fq 'f
-24
7.29
793
-.70
\S
uper
viso
rs a
s In
stru
ctor
s..-
.....
Inve
ntor
y C
vntr
olLa
bor
Rel
atio
ns'.
Exe
cutiv
e T
rain
ing
for
Sup
ervi
sors
may
-35
353N
Effe
ctiv
e R
eadi
ng3
33
App
lied
Gra
phic
s &
Fin
e A
rts
9.
9_
9
Bus
ines
s E
nglis
h &
Rep
ort W
ritin
g,..
..,:'
.9
9,9
Con
vers
atio
nal S
pani
sb -
-S
ales
man
ship
,...''
-.r
.,.
Pub
lic S
ervi
ce R
elat
ed..
Pub
lic S
ervi
ce, G
ener
al-
ti
' Edu
catio
n (D
ay C
are)
171-
,17
,.1
Pol
ice,
Law
Enf
orce
men
t, C
orre
ctio
ns62
6262
Fire
Con
trol
.,24
)24
024
0
Tra
ffic
Man
agem
ent
NIn
dust
rial S
ecur
ity,
Driv
er E
duca
tion
282
219
450
1N
501
,
Day
9re
Cl?
ild D
evel
opm
ent
i3.,
,. T
otal
, Sec
tion
371
,150
741
333
,1,
835
9,3
143
236
2,07
1
Tot
al, S
ectio
ns 1
, 211
. 31,
570
701,
031
.78
6<
1,34
94,
806
934
143
240
5,04
6
Sou
rces
: HE
GIS
Rep
orts
, 197
4-75
,
Add
enda
pre
pare
d by
Offi
ce o
f the
'Com
mis
sion
er fo
r th
e H
EG
IS R
epor
ts74
75.
TA
BLE
23
Uta
h S
yste
m o
f Hig
her
Edu
Cat
ion
Num
ber
of T
each
ers
Rec
omm
erid
eA fo
rC
ertif
iCat
ion.
,
Cla
ssifi
edin
lvie
l and
Inst
itutio
n, M
S T
hrou
gh 1
975
inst
itutio
n19
6514
66;1
967
1968
1969
1970
1971
1972
1923
1974
1975
'
Sou
ther
n U
tah
Sta
te C
olle
geE
arly
Chi
ldho
ods
__.-
-...
s1
Ele
men
tary
7070
5445
6458
6357
5560
,56,
`S
econ
dary
3047
5774
-71
6894
1<-1
29-
1-
'92
Ung
rade
d1
,1
,1
_T
otal
,..
70\It
101
102.
-*-
'13
813
0, .
132
152
175'
156
-15
2
Uni
vert
ity o
f Uta
hE
arly
Chi
ldha
Eid
1,
,14
.17
26
4-
Ele
tmen
tary
159
170
1'
158,
184
213
268
=' 2
41,
'-182
122
___1
49S
econ
dary
263
174
'.24
831
830
3 -
323
0_,
301
302
283
167
187
Ung
rade
d,
9550
116
. MO
42`5
552
55
' Tot
al42
253
9'
406
552
632
591,
672
527
569
358
.,.41
7
Uta
h S
tate
Uni
vers
ityE
arly
Chi
ldho
od..,
...
=24
-N
, ..-
7
Ele
men
tary
17_8
236
252,
227
258
- 26
124
2'21
6 ,
155
140
135
Sec
onda
ryer
368
'41
641
436
436
738
9.41
034
431
5°
232
255
Ung
rade
d16
2942
.26
.26
'28
60.5
254
Tot
al'
546
652
682
620
667
676
687
588
530
448
471
's
Web
er S
tate
Col
lege
Ear
ly C
hild
hood
...,
'6
-
410
Ele
men
tary
6485
'97
8813
111
710
581
,56
96, 1
09
Sec
onda
ry80
109
118-
'10
613
814
210
9'
117
8410
015
1
Ung
rade
d1
-
Tot
al'1
4419
4.:-
. 215
194
270
259.
c"214
198
146
200
270
Tot
al S
tate
Inst
itutio
nsE
arly
Chi
ldho
od-b
--7-
-1
2850
67
Ele
men
tary
471
°56
156
154
466
670
465
153
648
341
844
9
Sec
oncl
aisi
.7
182
982
784
592
5 ,
89,
857
794
590
685
Ung
rade
d--
95-1
679
159
2715
771
115
104
109
Tot
al1,
182
1,48
5. 1
,404
,1
468
1,70
71:
656'
_1
705
.1,
465
1,42
01,
162
1,31
0
'Est
imat
ed.
.
°
TA
BLE
23
(Con
t.)
Inst
itutio
n4.
;.1
965
1966
1967
1968
1969
9
1970
1971
1972
1973
, 197
4 .
1975
*
Brig
ham
You
ng U
nive
rsity
Ear
ly,C
hild
hood
5610
398
Ele
mer
itary
"401
370
400
478,
42'
.5
618
562
524
530
Sec
onda
ry61
1"
504
623
650
'70
77
.05
740
7417
:154
362
1._
Ung
rade
d':
31-
7765
9911
'1
100
186
240
..z.
.T
otal
,..1,
012
905
1,10
01,
193
1,22
61,
481;
636
1,45
81,
544
1,41
0.1
±23
R,,,
..,W
estm
inst
er C
olle
sie.
..
Ele
men
tary
711
1016
.14
1024
1621
z23
14
.,S
econ
dary
88
1011
'20
14.
1418
2325
',2
3I, 'b
\T
otal
'
15-
1920
2734
24I
3834
4448
37
Tot
al.A
ll In
stitu
tions
Ear
ly C
hild
hood
.'
,1
8415
316
5
Ele
men
tary
879
942
971
'1,0
381,
100
1,35
91,
330
1,17
01,
066
965
993
Sec
onda
ry1,
330
1,34
11,
460
1,50
6'1
409
1,61
71,
716
1,61
51,
557
-1,1
581,
319
z
Ung
rade
dT
otal
*.12
693
144
.25
814
433
317
1.e
s' 3
0134
410
9
2,20
92
409
02,
524
2,68
8,2,
967
3,16
03,
379~
2 95
73,
008
2 20
2 58
6N
CO
Per
cent
Cha
nge
Ove
r P
revi
ous
Yea
r '
13.8
%9.
1%4.
8%6.
5%10
.4%
6.5%
,6.
9% 1
2.5%
.. 1.
7% 1
2,-
1.3%
A.
-
Sou
rce:
Uta
h, S
tate
Boa
rd o
f Edu
catio
n,-
Sta
tus
ofT
each
er P
erso
nnel
on
Uta
h,19
74-7
5(g
ait
Lake
City
:U
tah
Sta
te B
oard
, of
Edu
catio
n,19
5)-
,--B
lue
Sec
tion.
.-
-.v
.
'1
4e.7 TABLE 24
Utah System of Higher Education
Number of Elementary and Secondary Teachers Graduating fromollegesAnd Universities in Utah and Accepting Teaching Positions in Utah,
1972-73 and 1973-74
NumberRecommended fo;
Certificate"
PergentAccepting
Number Teaching Positionsin State in Utah
Name of InstitUtion 1973-74. 197243 1973-74 ,1972-73
University of UtahUtah State UniversityWebei State College 4.'
358 -448
: ibo
569
1- 6
191
136126
214151
92- Utah State College 156 175 . 44 52,Sauthern
Young University 1,410 1,544 419 13'9irBrighaniWestminster CojfeTge 48 44 20 7
, Total 2,620 3,008 936 955
1973-74 1972-73
53.4% 37.6%30.4 28.5 ,
63.0 63.0 128.2,, 29.7
129.7 28.441.7 . 152.9---/-35.7% 31.7%
,;
Source: Utah, State Board of Education, Stalus' of Teacher Personnel in Utah, 1974-75 (Salt Lake City: UtahSta4,8oard of Education, 1975), Blue Section.
TABLE 25
Utah System of Higher Education Is,
'Number of Students Graduating from Utah Institutions of Higher Education, ;In Elementary and Secondary Education and Percent Accepting
Teaching Positions in Utah; 1959 -60 Through 1973-74 ,
e
Number of4 Year, Institutions '
.:.1.9551-60 , 5 1,678 841 , 50%
9960-61 5 ,,,s 1,578 732 46
1961-62 5 , 1,541 / 836 54.621.,4--1' 1962-63 5 ' 1 896 55
1963-64 6 , 1,9,41.---i-----11., 1'052 55
1964-0 6 Z 2209 ''''' itffs- -- _ 53 -
1965-66 6 2;4094,..
1,319 _55:___
1966-67 '6 ,2,524 ,, , 1,236 .49 ,---
1967-68 6 ,688 1,245 44:1,,>--
1969-70 -4Y 6 ' a, 60
. 1,2391,041 ----- 33
=---421968-69 6
-1970-71 6 , 1,379 1,101 33
° 1971-72 6 2,957 1,005 -IA."'1972-76 6 3,008 9'55 "321973:5'4 6 2,620 '936 , 36
total 36,240 * 15,609 \ 4" 43%'..1, L
2 w.,
. Source: Utah, State:Board of Education, Status of Teacher Personnel in Utah, 1978 (Salt Lake Cii Utah State
- Board of Edutation, 1975), Blue Section.
Number of Graduatesin Elem. 8. Sec. Education
Accepted TeachingPositions in Utah
Number Percent
OS.
1 0 k 4.01,1:=S41C1X,17,,v,,minnutilia
ft
Y
IV. Budgets and Finance
4.
1U3
Budgeting involves many: Regents,staff and legislators work with theGovernor on its formulation.
'
The Utah Legislature appropriated a record $74.3' million forhigher education purposes for the 1974 -75 fiscal-wear, continuingthe increasing .appropriation support of past years. (See figure 1)
The willingness of ,Utah taxpayers. to support higher educationcontinues at a high level, in contrast with the state's financial ability.The 197,5 Legislature, for example, appropriated $16.74 per each1,000 of personal per capita income, making Utah fifth in that cate-gory in the entire United States. In appropriations per capita,Utah was 10th in the entire nation."
1 Jack Margarrell, "How Higher Education Is Faring in 50 States," TheChronicle of Higher Education, Vol. XI, No. 9, November 10, p. 1
Figure 1. In easing System AppmpriationS
55
50
'45
40
35
30
256
20
15
4
57.2
65.6
C-. 74.1
52.4.C'"
4.53
40.0
34.8
4..,
1161404
29,9A
2_6.1L
. ,.
.kr...
irE7i "
TJ
6566 66.67 67.68 6869 69.70 70,71 7172 72.73
General Fund Appropriations in Millions of Drillers 1965.66 through 197475
1467 it Includes 4% reduction by State Action196849' Includes 3% reduclion by State Action.197041. OrigInel appropriation before 2% reduction by Stale Anon1972-73: Includes deficit epproprletions to the Unryersity Noshing $1.9 million and
(2) Dime College $33.000.197374, Includes deficit appropriation toMisie College $27.344. f'1974-76, Includes 3% reduction by Stele Action and deficit eppropdatIons of $794,000.
Source. Legislative Ou8ryt Recommendations Utah Systems of Higher Education. 1971.72through W74-7S and Financing Higher Education in Utah. Coordineting.Council of HigherEducation, years 194463 through 194940.
73.74 74.75
As the higher education needs i do the needs and want,.of every division of state governmc t. Yet the Utah ,Systern ofHigher F;ducation's claim on the.publ purse has remained relativelyconstant since the State Boit'rd of Resents began governing the SyS-tern in 1969. (..S figure. 2) Appropriations to higher educationhave remained in e with those o other state agencies.
e.r
Figure 2. Legislative Appropriations' 1974-75
Public EducatiOnElementary and Secondary
Other Regular AgenciesOther EducationSocial ServicesNatural ResourcesDevelopment ServicesPublic SafetyBond ServicesGeneral Government
Higher Education
Special PurposesState BuildingsProvo Jordan ParkwayParks and RecreationCentral School BuildingsBicentennial CommissionWater Resources
$189 l
94.5
74.2 .
27.0
Tottl $384.8
Higher Educationpercentageslast 5 years
1974 75
1973 74
1972 73
1971 72
1970.71
Utah combined appropriations from General and Uniform,School Funds. Percent and Dollar Distribution, 1974 75
U5 5 million transfer from the General Fund,
SOURCE, Utah Foundation. Report No 349. November 1975
1
19
21
I
sr.
,
However, the tax resources these citizen and lwgislatiNre effortsactually proditce in terms of per student support arc less encouraging.
01 Large families and higher than average attendance percentages con-tinue to push Utah 'per-stude'nt=support toward the bottom amongthe states. This, as in the past, requires extraordinary managementto maintain quality.
Inflation and enrollrnetit 4ncrease.s also have diluted the impactof 'increasing appropriationsi When appropriations arc viewed asconstant 1-969 dollars (the first year of the State Board of Regents) tocompensate for inflation's impaci, appropriations have increased 36percent during these five years. Enrollment growth has furthereroded funding'increases. The net effect over the last five years hasbeen that appropriations per student have grown only 27 percent..
Inflation's impact on total budget when student fees and othercollections are included with appropriations is more dramaticyet. P student costs have increased only 9 percent during the five-year period. f See Figure 3)4.'
4 1 J889
inflation's effect felt most deeplyin per student support.
/
Figure 3. ,:inflatio s Impact an Higher Educati9ti
160
40
GRO NOICES'Percent :e increases during thelast years (1969.?0 Base)
180
(
Appropriatidn ,
itotal Cost
inflation
,, :;R:=',V,,, ,. Enrollment
100 're %,:' E "k',q ?, 11*
:'''69.70 70.71 . 7072, 72-73 7174 74-75._ ..1 ,, ,,
A more valid portrayal considers student growth and inflation's impact: ..
Per Student Support "co 1300at00
V. 120cat
91o,
. 100
Appropriation'Per Student
total Bosther Student
70 71 7 72 72.73 4 .74-75Apse: 1966 level times annual inflation i
SOURCE: Cona n we Index rAcademicle SemiAnnual Enrollment SuMinary:
nstitutional budget Requests: Education n eneral
o
903,3
The rate of inflation' and student growth are not the only reasonsfor the lack of any real expanSion in per student support. Onemajor reason why total budget has failed to keep pace lies in theeffort to keep student contributions at the lowest possible level. Stu-dent tuitions remained nearly static between 1969 and 1974-75, withincreases authorized only At selected institutions during that period.( L'egislative intent in appropriations legislation forbade tuition ad-justmeixts for many years.) These-effo' rts, naturally,) reflect the feel-ing of Utah's people that educational opportunity sh"Ould be en-
,' couraged. (See,Figure 4)
Figure 4. Fee Comparisons
basic Fees Charged-Resident Students, U of U, and Teathing Vniversitiesin Surrounding States, 1974-75 _ 4
SOURCE. Chronicle of Higher Educitlon. Mar 31, 1975, P. 11
Ci
CI
)
-M
The adoption in March 1975 of a statewide tuition policy was agreat step toward more rational, tuition adjustments among the insti-tutions. The policy e.sta.blishs stable and objective relationships'between resident tuition charges at the several institutions and tiesnonresident tu,ition charges to resident levels, thus removingmanyf the legislative con*erns which prevented past tuition adjustments.
The following tat)les further documFnt the budgetary situation at',Utah inscitutionq of iiigher education:
ti
TablesTABLE 1
TABLE 2
TABLE 3
:,tABLETABLE
'TAB '6
TABLE 7
ABLE 8
Revenue an75. p. 93/
4
the
Expendi1/4rres for Board Administration and Statewide Programs, 1974
Summa of General Fund Appropriations' (Including All Lihe Items) 1968-69Throu 1974-35: p. 94
Stu ent Tuaion'And Fees and Other Charges for the Academic Year 1975 -76. p. 95
everale for Operations, By Instiiution, 1972-43 Through 1974-75. p. 96
Expenditures far Operations, By Institution, 1972-73 Through 1974-75. p. 96
Total Revenues for Education and General, By Institution, 1972-73 Through 1974-75. p. 98
Total Student Credit Hours uced, By Institution, 1969-70 Through 1974-75.p, 100
Cost of Student Cr2jiit Hairs Produced Ily Institution, 1969-70. Thibukh 1974-75.°p. 1.01
1 1' t92
fr
TABLE 1
" Utah System of Higher Educatio
Revenue and Expenditures for Board AdministrationAnd Statewide Programs, 1972-73 and 1973-74.
1972-73 1973-74 1974-75'140
ADMINISTRATIONRevenue
Appropriation $419,903 $4.49,100 $467,540Federal Funds
Veterans Administr6tIn $ 31,399 S 34,667 S 40,942Title I Administration 15,500 17,100 18,800Community Affairs Dept Transfer 4,351
' 'Sub Total Federal Funds ,
Total Funds Available
46,899 56,118
$505,210,
59,742
$527,282$466,802 '
-
.ExpendituresPersonal Services
Salaries $295,001 4325,713 $353,742Board Per Diem
Sub Total
6,712 8,750 8,913
$301,713 $334,463 $362,655Employee Benefits 36,878 63,054 57,765
Total Personal Services 4 $338,591 $387,517 $420,420Current Operating Expense 66,750 75,691 69,525Travel 15,612 9 19,568 20,132Capital Outlay.' 2,231. $,326' 1,498
Fatal Expenditures 3423,1,07 $488,102 $511,575
Unexpended Balance S 43,615 4 17,116 S 15,707
STATEWIDE PROGRAMSRevenue
Appropriation /1,021%700 51,253,00b $1,362,420Federal Funds (Postsecondary Planning, 15,06bStudent Exchahe firagrom Contributions 4.000
Total Revenue $1,021,700 $1,253,000 $1,381,480Expenditures
Statewide TelevisionAdministration $ 60,081 $ 63,805 $ 63,928U, of U - KUED 280,000 299,600 331,740U$U Production Center 94,500 101,000 99,910County Translator System 63,000 67,400 73,720-
Total Statewide T, V 5497,581 $531,805 5569,298
CoFnputer Serval and lYniform Accounting $ 6006 $ 60,000 S 97,000WICHE Interstate Cooperation
Membership Fee 15,000 28,000 28,000Student Exchange Program 73,800 172,000' 188,000
National Direct 6tudent loansMatching Funds 150,000 150,000 97,000
Cooperative Nursing ProgramWSC and U of U 94,000 100,000 .1,27,070WSC and USU 81.000 86,000 84,390WSC and SUSC.and Dixie 48,500
WSC and UTCSL 50,000 75,000 78,570
Tatal Cooperative Nursing $225,000 $261;000 $338,530
Ethnic Awareness Program 50,000 43,500Postsecondary Planning' : , 15,060
Total Statewide P;agrams $1,021,381 $1,252,805 $1,376,388
Unexpended Balance 319 195 $ 5,092
'Federal Funds received under Title 1203 of the Higher Education Act Amendments of 197%.
11,293
s.
rti
ty
ti
TA
BLE
2
Uta
h S
ytte
mili
gher
Edu
catio
ns
Sum
mar
y of
Gen
eral
Fun
d A
ppro
pria
tions
(In
clud
ifg A
ll Li
ne It
ems)
197b
-71
Thr
ough
197
4-75
e
Pc
.In
stitu
tion
1970
-71
19/'1
-72
Q
1972
-73
ti-
1973
-74
1974
-75
U o
f U$2
1,46
9,00
052
5.40
2,00
0 5
$26.
346,
000
It: 5
29,8
88,0
0053
5,16
3,80
0
US
U'
11,1
6'9,
000
12,4
74,0
0013
,459
,100
15,5
18,0
00'
18,1
65,6
00*
i'"W
SC
5,37
5,00
06,
074,
000
-6,
884,
300
7,45
2,00
0.8,
975,
300
SU
SC
1;65
5,00
01,
925,
000
2,17
9,70
02,
454,
000,
2,96
5,80
0
Sno
W r
''7
36;0
0084
6,00
01,
op1,
ioo
1,16
1,00
01,
381.
600
C.,.
)D
ixie
804,
000
945,
0002
1.06
9,89
1.1,
272,
566?
1,45
9.20
0
.114
34C
EU
-545
,000
638,
000
'1,0
69,0
00
785,
900
974,
000
1,14
7,20
0
UT
C/'P
089
5,00
01,
409,
400
1,75
5,00
01,
961,
150
4:.
0TC
/SL
.`1,
603,
000
1,82
6,00
02,
627,
200
2,96
4,00
03,
430.
200
Boa
rd o
f Reg
ents
r_
,m
ilk
Adm
inis
trat
ion,
338,
000
434,
0004
419,
853
449.
100
482.
000
Sto
tew
ide
Pro
grom
s273
.1,0
0074
0,00
01,
021,
700
1,25
3,00
01,
40.4
,360
I.JS
HE
Tot
al$4
5,32
0,00
03fit
$52,
377,
000
$57,
204,
144
$65,
6t0,
666
$76,
536,
2101
'Incl
udes
Titl
e I A
dmin
istr
otid
n an
d V
eter
ans
Adm
inis
trat
ion
Can
trac
t..
'2In
clud
es: S
tude
nt L
oon,
E.T
.Nft.
, WIC
HE
, Con
tinge
ncy
Acc
ount
, Com
pute
r S
ervi
ce a
nd U
nifo
rm A
ccou
ntin
g S
yste
m, C
oope
rativ
e N
ursi
ng E
thic
Aw
aren
ess.
30rig
inal
4pr
opria
tion
pric
ir t o
o 2
% r
educ
tion
by S
tate
act
ion.
4An
addi
tiona
l 54,
512
was
late
r op
prop
riate
d fo
r m
erit
syst
em s
olar
y im
prov
emen
t.'In
clud
es 5
1,90
0,00
0 de
ficit
appr
opria
tion
mod
e by
the
1972
legi
slat
t.ire
for
FY
197
1 -7
2 fo
r th
e U
nive
rsity
of U
toh
Hos
pita
l:
°Inc
lude
s 55
5,00
0 de
ficit
appr
opria
tion
mod
e by
the
1972
legi
slat
ure
for
FY
197
1-72
.'In
clud
es 5
27,5
66 d
efic
it ap
prop
riatio
n m
ode
by th
e 19
74 L
egis
latu
re fo
r F
Y 1
973
-74.
89rig
inal
app
ropr
iatio
n (p
rior
to o
3%
red
uctio
n by
Sta
te A
ctio
n) p
lus_
supp
lem
ento
lopp
ropr
iatio
nvof
597
5,96
0 m
ade
by th
e 19
75 L
egis
latu
re fo
r F
Y 1
974-
751
Sou
rce:
Low
s of
Uto
h
Tui
tion
and
Reg
istr
atio
nR
esid
ent S
tude
nts
allo
nres
iden
t Stu
dent
s
TA
UU
tah
Sys
tem
of H
ighe
r E
duca
tion
Stu
dent
Tui
tion.
bhd
Fee
sfo
r th
e A
cade
mic
Yea
r 19
75-7
6
Uni
vers
ities
Fou
r-Y
ear
Col
lege
sT
wo-
Yea
r C
olle
ges
Tec
hnic
al C
olle
ges
U. o
f U.d
U.S
.U.
W.S
.C.
S.U
.S.C
.S
NO
WD
IXIE
C.E
_U.
PR
OV
OS
ALT
CA
KE
S 4
20.0
0S
376.
5053
24.0
053
00.0
052
64.0
052
64.0
0S
264.
0952
76.0
052
76.0
0
1,23
0.00
1,05
7.50
8.10
.00
750.
0066
0.00
660.
0066
0.00
876.
0087
6.00
..-
,18
.00
30.0
019
.50
34.5
031
.50
29.0
042
.00
18.0
09.
00
60.0
050
.00
79.0
060
.00
21.0
027
.00
30.0
045
.00
45.0
0
121
.00
31.5
029
.00
24.0
024
.00
16.0
027
.00
--
-6.
00 s
10.5
06.
0042
.00
9.00
12.0
0,,
2700
--
--
3.00
-,
--
--
--
-_L
...-
---
-*
--,i-
-14.
50-
15.0
0-=
-6.
00 -7.
50 -3.
00 -6.
00 -- -
-- -
,.,
1.00
'-
'.---
..---
--6.
009
9.00
°3.
000
3.00
b
105.
0012
0.00
1414
.00
129.
00 -
109.
5012
6.00
108.
0078
.00
84.0
0r.
.-
525.
0049
6.50
-46
5.00
429.
0037
3.50
390:
0037
2.00
354.
0036
0.00
'°51
,335
.00
651,
177.
50S
951.
0058
79:0
057
69.5
057
86.0
0S
268.
0059
54.0
059
60.0
0.
Oth
er F
ees
,
Stu
dent
Act
ivity
.B
uild
ing
Fee
,A
thle
tic F
eeU
nion
Bui
ldin
g F
eeA
lum
ni F
ee-
Dev
ilopm
ent F
und
1,le
ctur
es, C
once
rts,
The
ater
, etc
.
"'-'
-'la
bora
tory
Med
ical
-Ins
uran
ce o
r H
ealth
Ser
v.la
bora
to,
.
I.ti,
Oth
er-
Tot
al O
ther
Fee
s
Tot
al T
uitio
n an
d F
ees
Cha
rged
Eac
hF
ull -
time
Stu
dent
Per
adem
ic Y
ear
Res
iden
t Stu
dent
s ,
Non
resi
dent
-Stu
dent
s
°Yea
rboo
kbS
tude
nt In
sura
nce
`Cla
ss F
ee'A
cade
mic
yea
r tu
ition
for
the
-Col
lege
s of
Med
icin
e an
d la
w a
t the
Uni
vers
ity o
.f.A
.9ta
h as
follo
ws:
Ure
vor
lay
el W
eille
gC
oe e
lC
olle
gelg
o..
.doo
ella
Ite$
4,11
4S
lude
los
..10
...,
S''
711
00'
geS
CO
Tge
gl T
uago
l, an
d F
e.11
14 0
0.A
0.,-
----
56.
I CO
lgen
igud
ent S
gsai
lurf
t,
T,e
ggn
ll31
,374
0031
.236
00,
togi
l TuA
lon
mul
Fe.
1,{7
900
t .34
0 00
a'
TABLE i 4
Utah System of Higher Education
Revenue for Operations, By Institution,.1972-73 'Through 1974-75 '
1972-73 ActualGeneral Other
Fund Operating TotalInstitution APprcipriation % Revenue % 100%
o i
U of U $26,255,000 29 $ 64,155,241 71 $ 90,410,241USU 13,459,100 36 23,618,469 64 37,077,569WSC 6,884,300 49 7,181;005 51 14,065,305SUSC 2,179,700 60 1,445,393 40 3,625,09Snow 1,001, NO 76 315,304 24 1,316,404Dixie 1,069,900 64 611,380 36 1,681,280CEU 765,900 64 422,699 36 1,188,599UTC/P 1,409,400 ,51,-,'Y. 1,342,589 49 2,751,989UTC/Sl. 2,62X 200 66° 1,359,895 34 3,987,095Board of Regents
Administration , 376,288 89 46,899 11 423,187Statewide Programs 1,021,376 100 1,021,376
USHE Total $57,049,264 36% $100,498,874' 64% $157,548,138
lBalance of Appropriation lapsed.2Balance of Appropriation unexpendedSource: Institutional Budget' Requests.
TABLE 5
Utah Syitern of Higher Education
Expenditures-for Operations, By institution,1972-73 Through 1974-75
Institution
19721irActupl°Educatioand General
All OtherPrograms Total
U of U $35,529,728. $54,880,513 /590,410,241USU 15,652,417 21,425,152 37,077,569WSC 9,504,831 4,560,474 14,065,305SUSC 2,836,836 ° 788,257. 3,625,093Snow 1;137,100 179,304 1,316,404
A--- Dixie` 1,462,640 218,640 1,681,280,,'k. CEU. 947,956 240,643 1,188,599
UTC/P, 2,390,214 361,775 2,751,989UTC/Sl. 3,456,653 530,442 3,987,095Board of Regents
AdministrationStatewide Programs
; 423,1871,021,376
423,1871,021,376
USHE Grand Total $72,918,375 $84,629,763 $157,548,138
Source: thsfitutional Budget fteq6ests
11596
I'
1973-74 Actual 1974-75 Actual
GeneralFund
Appropriation %
OtherOperating
Revenue %
General Other
Anal Fund Operating100%fe0 Appropriation % Revenue %
Total100%*
529,888,000 30 69,340,073 70 S 99,228,073 34,112,180 30 78,02 0 112,134,547
15,518,000 38 ,25,078,135 62` 40,596,135 11,627,64 37 30,075,006 63 47,702,646
7,922,006 56 6,181,513,, 44 14,103,513 8,710,0 53 7,866,156' 47 36,576,196
2,454,000 68 1,171,230 32 3,625,230, 2,882,1'20 67 1,447,547 33 4,329,767
1,161,000 69 512,871 31 1,673,871 J,342,900 66 677,049' 34 2,019,949
1,272,566 71" 4 51 0,087 29 1',782,653 1,415,700 70 602,061 30 2,017,761
974,000 69 429,109 31 1,403,109 1,113,090 56 882,657 44 1,995,747.*
1,755,908' 57 /041,104 41 3,096,104 1,902,642 50 1,871,838 50 3,774,480
2,964,000 58 2,175,976 42 5,139,976 3,327,630 67 1,642,632 33 4,970,262
, .
449,100' 92 39,012 8 488;112 451,833? .as 59;742 12 511,57.5
1,253,0001100 (195) 1,252,805 1,357,320 99 19,060 1 1,376,388
$65,610,666 38% $1.06,778,915 62 %$172,389,5'81 $74,243,20t 38% 5123,166,115 197,409,318
5L
973-74 Actual 1974-75 Actual
Educationand General
All OtherPrograms 'total
Educationand General
All OtherPrograms
539,538,906 559,689,167 5 99,228,073 44,053,132 68,081,415
17,275,960 23,320,175 40,596.135 19,280,234 28,422,412
10,543;571 3,557,942 14,103,513 11,825,120 4,751,076
3,031,730 593,500 3,625,230 .3,587,888 741,879
1,319,591 351-,280' 1,673,871 1,57T,4)7 7 448,N2
1,599,102 183,551 1,782,653' 1,744,941 272,820
1,054,750 348,359 1,403,109 1,207,089 788,65'
2,756,450 339,654 3,096,104 3,270,320 504,16
4,533,852 606,124 5,139,976 4,782,079 188,183
488,112 488,112 511,575
1,252,805 1,252,805 1,376,388
$81,655,412 $90,733,669 -$172,389,58. $91',322,220 $106,087,098
11697
Total
112,134,54747,702,64616,576,1964,329,7672,019,949'2,017,7611,995,7473,774,4804,970,262
511,5751,37`6,388
$197,40
TABLE 4$
Utah System of Higher Education
Total Revenues for Education and General, By Institution,1972,7,3 Through 1974 -75
1972,13 ///tucil
Institution
11 of U
WSC
SUSC
' SnowDixie
CEU'
UTC/P
UTC /S1
Total
Appropriation
t21,441,00010,367,959
6,784,3002,149,7001,0010001,069,900
765,9001,392,400
2,611,200
Student'.Fees I
$ 97101,4263,816,8002,031,837
545,358157,222
304,944
108,12? ,
'509,1374 712,552
$47,590,459 $17,287,398
Other. Total
$4,987,3021,467,658
688,694141,778
(21,222)
7 ,93448 ,677132,901
$8,040,518
,535,529,7Z0,_15,652,4170'9,504,831
2,836,8361,137,1001,462,640
947.:25.6
2,390,2143,456,653
$72,918,375
Appropriatioln
$24,285,000 .
11,847,0007,752,0002,424,0001,151,000'
1,262,5662924,000
1,735,P00
2,948,000
S54,328,566
'Does not include fees from Continuing Education. ,Continuing FduCati6n revenue is included in Ofher Revenue.
2Includes 527:566 deficit oppropriotion mode by the 1974 LegislcOure for FY-07-3-74.
34ncluctes Supplemental Appropridtions for minimum wage and fuel requirements.
Squrce: Irititutionol Budget Requests
,r
I
O
1 798
b
'41
1,
1973-74 Actual '1974-75 Actual
StudentFoul Other" Total Appropriation 3
StudentFees1 Other Total
$ 8453,1388 5.6,800,818 '` 539,538,906 $28,355,230 $ 9;572,722 46,125,180 ' $44,053132
9,591,651 1,837,307 '17,275,960 13,644 820 4,135,748 1,499,666 19,26,234
'1,758,129 , 1,035,442' 10,545,571 8,546,110 2,541,038 737,972 11,825,120
488,257 119,473 3,031,730 2,853,120 627,444 ,107,324 3,587,388
183,944 (15,353)' 1,319,591 1,333,200 192,368 45,3.49 1,571,41'7
294,286 42,250 1,599,102 1,406,000 295,237 43,704 1,744,941
100,527 30,223 1,054,750 1,064,590 126,197 16,302 1,201,089
578,740 442,710 2,756,450 1,883,242 - 724,689 662,389 3,27020
790,781 795,071 4,533,852 3,312,110 857,080 412,889 4,782;079
516,239,48'k $11,087,941 $81,655,912 562,398,422 $19,072,523 $9,851,215 $91,321,
11899
o_
O
ti
TABLE 7
--,,,Utah.SysteM of Higher Education
A Suthm ary of Styclit it-Credit-Hours (SCH) Produced° By Institut1969.70 Through 1974-75
Institutions
A. UNIVERSITIESw
(Ai-ersity of Utah.
"Utah Shoe.Unive;sity,
. x B. FouP.YEAR :COLLEGES
7,4,
Number 'of Student-Credit:Moors Produced
.
4
1969-70 1970,71 1971-72' 1972 -''3 1973.74 1974-75' -
804,3136 824,269
364,305 1.1.461,908
.1614 :4
845,8i5.
356,993
.
x.,. .. ';,
,§42 f31 830,54,3 6,4 ,."'.. i,316,440.. 36470k!"'
N\'k,
847,726
. 37,666 I
.
`,Weber/State vo
".. A
w. Squt4ern Utah Stgta College
t
- -
TWO-YEAR COLLEGES
Snow College
0 .,jxie College
Collet) of Eastirn U,loh
'-11. A 7
- 13.,1joc-,TECIMICAL COLLEGES.
e
... .. 7 ,..0 o% .:.
'I* 4lfr4c, .0 4. .,e ,,, Iir.. q * ;..,. . *r - ,.. ..-,-.......r .
343.,b62 348,657' 305,880 .299,777 306,696 915,053,,
S,616 . 86 781 83;758A
.
Utah TetAnical College/PI:'ovo- r
Utah Te nical College /SL
70,150
33,014 33,921 31;476 27,647 31,893 34,517
4 46,462 48,906 43,949 44:141 44,042 - 43,276
313,112 28,332
58,237 . 65,442
'4'.24,881
76,988
;1,836 21,472 22,459
88,266 92,997 107,530
87,916, 98,221 118,506. 131,137 139,199 157,730
TOTAL-US
,44/'Source: Plan Insti tions'Enrol(ment Reports.
u 4.Extended dg alrinstittitions for all years. All data is Year and Summer Extended Da)( SCH.Replaces irer table ID earlier Annual Reports.
1- 848,910 1,896,437 1,888,316 1,909,158 1,901,697 1,984,837
1
.1
TABLE 8
Utah System of Higher Education
A Summary of Cost °for Student-Credit Hour, ByInstitution.,1969-70 Through 1974-75
Cost Per Student-Credit-Hour Produced ,
Institution
A. ,UNIVERSITIES
1969-7.0 1970-71 r971-72- 1972-73
.
1973-74 1974-75
k., University of Utah .. $34.97 $37.06 $39.43 $42.19 47.61 $51.97
w
Utah State Uniyrsity, 34.06 . 17.55 41;44 41.5.8 47.37 ' 51.05. .
.
FOUR-YEAR COLLEGES'V'
.. ' ,t,0*
I ,
''CP '
Weber State College).
w, 22.34 23.99 28.88 41.71 34.38 37.53
Southern Utah State College 26.45 26.69 31..06 36.46 43.22 45.49
C. TWO-YEAR COLLEGES.
,r
Snow College 27.91 28.85 33.61 41.13* 41.38 45.53. '
Dixie College 22.72 25.66 30.27 33.14 36.31 40.32
College.of Eastern Utah 23.38 26.70 33.34 43.41 49.12 53.75
tw
D. VOC.-TECHNICAL COLLEGES
Utah Technial College / 0? 25.00 25.SJ 23.52 4.27,08 '29.64 30.41
Utah Technical College/Sl. $24.44 $25,64." $25.20 526.36 . $32.57 $30.32
Source Of f;cr of th'e Commissioner
°Education and Geheral expenditures divided by Academic Year and Summer Extended Day SCH.
Replaces similar tables in earliercw;;nual Repots
120
101
V., Planning and Capital Facilities
A major updating of the states masterplan marks year's efforts
r
121
PlanningThe State Boardof Regents oncentrated its planning efforts dur-
ing .1974-75 in three basic are : enrollment projections, financial'needs and post - secondary voc tional-technical education.
Task forces, supported by staff from the Office of the Commis-sioner of Higher Education, pro,duced draft recommendation's which,camp-before the Regents in Maith for preliminary review.
On May 2, approximately 150 Utah citizens added their ideasto the process at'a statewide planning conference. Included amongthe delegates to this iconference were legislators, institutional councilmembers; business,L labor Id industry representatives;, students,faculty and administrators from'Utah higher eciiication institutions.
In June the' Regents approved for publication two documentswhich now have been printed and circulated among the institutions.The first, Master Planning For Postsecondary Education in Utah:Assumptions and Goals, outlines the fOundation upon which the on-going process of Utah higher education planning is based. Program-ming trends, projected enrollments, and possible financial needs arepainted in broad strokes. This enhances the thorough, localized in-vestigation which characterizes the Regent processes. The second,A Report of the Vocational-rechnikal Educa(iOn Task Force, is
described on page'19.
Figure I. Enrollment Planng'Model
1 2103
14,
. An enr011ruent Planning mcodel ('See figure 1.) was used in fore-cq.sting enrollment trends:for the next 18 years. -Based on threeitIternafe iiisurnptionx,1 range of possible projected en Alments wassuggested. (S,.e figure .2) The middle projection is. c 'idered mostlikely. HoweVer, it'is yecognized t6fiat actual enrollments could varytoward high or low projection levels from year to year.
Figure 2. Range of Possible Enrol en s
80.000/
,
79623
63419,
6009560.000
t6 1 24
V`l5'RV7 /au.
519920'
50.000
40.000
SURVIVAL ASSUMPTIONS
Birth T4oughHigh School GraduatJ
Entering FreshmenThtough College Graduates
W
LowProjection
Lowest survival rates-*last 5 years
'74
Weighted lowsurvival rates"
UTAH SYSTEM OF HIGI#R EDUCATION ^AUTUMN HEADCOUNT ENROLLMENT.1966 -67 TO 1974.75 ACTUAL,and 197576 TO 1992.9P.Esilimmitr'
'80 '82 , -'84 '86'i.
'88 ,. '90 . '92. %
WENDED-DA ,,ALL INSTITUTIONS
123,*1104
0
There were three basic factors considered in developing" the stu-
dent ,e4ollment model and projections. Live births to Utah resi-dents were a :key consideration.. When shifted 18 years into thefuture,. these birth13 constitute the bask pool from which a significant-portion of the student1populations will be taken. According to that
stud relatively stable enrollments could be anticipated through the
late 1 80s ( See Figure 3).
Figure 3 Ut Live Births
1940a hrough 1974.
30.000
2
1
26911
30,000
1.000
26272 26213 26969
25449' 24905-24236 \
, .,
22601.
L 000
1.000
tilM.11111111111Wililli111111111111111,
121P5 20669EN18220
MIERENE
Ell16180 ilhhN
I 1111
MIENMos t?,YlarS.44)1.581
Yaws-111-'1
44347
IICtilo11
BoldArea
1.161101filii,t0
.:------ - .
58 '86 _ 232- '50 '48 \'46,
Scotto' Utah eta eau of Vote Stahsboa
124105
1
'42 '40
ro
90
80
70
6 60
50
40
30
20
_
4,0d
Net migration patter and "survival" throtigh the school systemwere the other two variables considered: For the past six years, Utahhas experienced in-migration. That contrasts With the pattern ofmixed netin-and-out-migration of the 1960s. This shift in migrationpattern could have a: Pdsitive impact' on -university aid college en-rollments.
4 z_Figure 4. Post High Schootintentions,
Utah High School Graduates,; 1969 Through 1975
1968 1969 1970 1971 1972. 1973 1974
High school graduates indicating en-intention to seek post secondary training,I for years 1969 through 1975.
SOURCE: High School Intentions Survey 1969 Through 1975
1975
f)
(s.
The attitude toward posthecondary training of the pool of indi-viduakfrom which enrollments are drawn is an additional factor tobe considered when projecting higher education-enrollments. A sur-
a vey of educational intentions of Utah high school graduates con-,. ' ducted each year since 1966 shows a marked shift in attitude away
from attendance at postsecondary education institutions Y (See
Figure 4).
Apparently economic circumstances play a large role in influenc-ing student attitudes. After two. years of /Tear stable enrollment, the ",
Utah System of Higher Education during 1974-75 experierked a -,surge in enrollment growth. The 5.8 percent increase paralleled, anational trend:where unexpected growth, occurred at many insti -.ttistioris. Analysis of the Uph System supports the hypothesis that
- 1974-75 increases were due largely to decreasing work availability asan alternative to college enrollment.
Figure-5. Autumn Quarter Enrollmen' t in the System
ResidentNon Resident
TOTAL;TOTAL.
TOTALTOTAL 1-,"
50,01949,08950 48,038
45
40
35
30
25
20
15
10
TOTAL TOTAL49,061 49,126
51,992
TOTAL54,738
1969 1970. 1971 1972p 1973
Utah Sliatem of Higher EducationAutumn Enrollment, Extended'Day Headcount
Years 1969.70 Through 1975.76
SOURCE. USHOnrollment Reports.
1974 1975
cY
Capital Facilities
A healthy boost in the funds available for capital facilities con-struction. 'came as the 1975 Utah Legislature authorized the Stateto bond for 470 million, mostly for new higher education facilities.Besides 'allocating $35 million from that bond for the enlargementof the University of Utah hospital and college of medicine, there wassufficient money available to construct seven other new buildings onthe Utah campuses. The bond also included $1.8 million to meetother,repaii-, alt'eration and improvement projects not fundedthrough a 1975 State appropriation 'of $7.5 million.
With the authorized new construction, the Regents further pressedtheir review of existing facilities.
Maximum utilization of space on Utah university and collegecampuses was a point of great Regent. interest. Spate utilizationstudies and a survey of space per student, by function, at institutionssimilar to .those in the Uthh System seernto demonstrate that Utahinstitutions have relatively law space utilization of classrooms andteaching laboratories, The Utah institutions generally ,rank high inavailable space by flinction when compared to similar institutionsin other states.
An analysis of the situation, relating space needs with enrollment,showed that Utah higher education institutions, could absorb-ap-proximately 56 percent more students and accommodate them with-in existing classrooms 00 72 percent more students in teachinglabovatories. Gradually, the small colleges could accommodate, thelargest percentage growth.
,Naturally other variables need to be considered. Specializedinstructional needs, claiStoom size and lochtion, age and quality,ofexisting facilities and the need for office and support fadilities mightlimit growth before optimum utilization of classrooThs and Classlaboratories is attained.
As the year drew to a close, the Regents adopted a capital facilitiespolicy calling for approved comprehensive capital facilities Master'plans before any new or remodeling of existing capital facilities beundertaken. Such construction will only come in the future .whenthe need is demonstrated with reference to approved institutional, -
academic and capital facilities master plans.
Student enrollments, ,space utilization, structural obsolescense,operational inefficiencies, operating budget constraints, and otherjustification information will be considered by the Regents prior tofuture, appc rovals. ,-
1 1,0
108
Computing yComputing in the Utah System of Higher Edtication operates
under authority of the State Board of Regents in coordination withthe statutory authority of the State Computer Steering Board. Sig-
nificant alterations in both the Regent policies and the statutes goy-.erning statewide computing were adopted during Fiscal Year 1974-75. As the year drew to a close, th,e.Regents also adopted planningaKsumptions and goals for higher education computing in the decade
ahead.In July 1974, the Regents amended the original computing policy,
and initiated a thrust toward a working computer netc'ork coordi-nating and harmonizing existing research:administrative and educa-tional institutions at the two universities and at Weber State College
as well as providing necessary computer services to the remain* six ,
institutions in the Utah System.By November, the Regents were far enough along to again amend
the policy, specifically outlining criteria and procedures for appro 'sal
of additions to or modifications of existing computer facilities, andthe purchase of additional equipment. ,
The legislature also revised the authonty of the Computer Steer-ing' Board. In enacting House Bill 141, the law makers requiredthe Utah* System of Higher Education to develop a master plan,system plans and operational and evaluative procedures for its com-puting system, under the guidelines of the Systems Planning Steering.Board. The Higher Education Computing Master Plan Must betransmitted to the State Computer Steering Board by June 30,1976.
The. Steering Board continues to approve and coordinate the ac-quisition of computer equipment or, equivalent services according tothe statute: Low-cost computer equipment may be exempted fromthe acquisition requirements.
The Regents' first Major application of its acquisition policy camein May, as they,Alpprovecl the acquisition of a new computing facilityfor Weber State College. In the approval, the Regents further ar-ticulated policy relating to in4tructional computing roles, which arenow under study in the System.
In dosing out the year, the Regents published the planningassumptions governing computing within the-System. Those adopted
a. Decisions'concerning computing and data processing, should be made bythose charged with the administration and management of higher educationand not those, outside the System.b, An appropriate liaison witto.state governmental computing should bemaintained while still recognizing the vital and necessary independence fromoutside control. e
128.109
E e. Optimization.of the cost effective use of computers should be at the Systemof Higher Education level, except as it relates to research.d. Data element, dofinitions shall be .,consistent with the Information Ex-change Procedures of the ,National Center for Higher Education Manage-ment Systems, 'whenever practicable.e. Data processing software for administrative and general educational pur-poses, determined to be of use to other institutions, shalt be programmedin machine independent languages unless such is demonstrated to be infeasible.f. 6imputer 'equipment acquired for administrative and general educa-tional purposes, shall be capable of processing machine independent lan-guages without significant conversion or adaptation.g. Computer hardWare and software in institutions of higher education shallbe made available to other institutions in the System on a cooperative basis. '
The following tables detail various enrollment and capital facili-ties information underlying the Regents' basiq)planning decisions. n,
TablesTABLE I Autumn Headcount and FTE Enrollments, Day Only Actual, 1966-67 Through
1970-71; Extended Day Actual, 1971-72 Through 1974-75, p. 111. .
VILE 2 Autumn Headcount Enrollment,"Resident and Nonresident, By Institutionj966-67Thrpugh 197475,.p. 112 ,
TABLE 3 A gurrunary of Autumn 1974-75 Headcount and F.T.E. Students, I3y Duel andType of Student, p. 114
TABLE 4 Autumn FTE Enrollments, By Institution, 1966-67 Through 1974-75, p. 115TABLE 5 A Comparison of Autumn Headcount Enrollments By Student Level and Residency,
1973 and 1974, p. 116TABLE 6 Entering,Resident Freshmen Autumn 1974, As a Percentage of High School Gradu-
ates Spring 1974, By County, p. 120TABLE 7 A Summary of SCH Loads, Autumn, 1974, p.121TABLE 8 A Summary of SCH Produced, By Level of Course, Autumn 1974, p. 122TABLE 9 A Summary of Students' Ages, By Institution, Autumn 1974, p. 123TABLE 10 Autumn Resident Headcount Enrollments, by County and Institution, With Per-
centages of County Students at Each Institution, 1973 and 1974, p. 124. TABLE 11 In-State, Out-of-State and Foreign Students, As a Percentage of Total Enrollment,
Autumn Headcount, 1971-72 Through 1974-75, p. 128TABLE 12 Utah Counties PrOviding Greatest Resident En:ill:bent Percentages, By Institution,
Autumn Headcount, 1974-75, p. 129 ,
TABLE 13 States and Foreign Countries Providing the Largest Number of Nonresident Stu....dents, by Institution, Autumn Headcount 1974-75, p. 130
TABLE 14 A Summary of the Migration of Students in the Western States, 1972:-.3.3; p. 132TABLE 15 Intentions of Utah's High School Graduates, 1970-1975, p. 133TABLE 16 A Summary of the Numbers and Ikrcentages of Utah High School Graduates Pland-
o ning to Attend a Utah Public Higher Education Institution, 1968 through 1975,p. 134
TABLE 17 Public and Private Veterans Enrollments and Graduates 1972-73 Through 1974-75,p. 135
TABLE 18 Capital Facilities Appropriations and Bonded Revenues 1969-70 Through 1975-76Actual; 1976-77Itecommended, p. 136
TABLE 19 Recommendation for Capital Facilities Appropriation 1976-77 (As Approved by theState Board of Regents, October 29, 1975), p. 138
TABLE 20 A Summary of Gross Academic Square Feet, FTE Siudents and the Gross AcademicSquare Feet Per FTE Student 1972-73 Through 1974-75, p. 139 -
TABLE 21 ertilization of Class Rooms, by Room and Station, Autumn QUarter,,1969 Through1974, p, 140
TABLE 2 Utilization of Teaching Labs by Room and Station, Autumn Quarter, 1969 Through1974, p. 142
1 2110
TA
BLE
1
Uta
h S
yste
m o
f Hig
her
Edu
catio
n
-A
utum
n H
eadc
ount
and
FT
E E
nrol
lmen
ts°,
.
Day
Onl
y A
ctua
l, 19
66-6
7 T
hrO
ugh
1970
-71;
Ext
ende
d D
ayA
ctua
l, 19
71-7
2Thr
ough
197
4-75
Num
ber
1966
-67
34,6
32
1967
-68.
$2
1968
-69
40,3
42
1969
-70
42,0
40
1970
-7i
42,8
34
1971
:72
43,2
34
°19
72-7
341
,740
Cc:
),19
73-7
441
,500
C=
:)19
74-7
544
,047
lesi
dent
Perc
enta
ge
Sou
rces
: Aut
umn
Enr
olln
ient
Rep
orts
.
84.6
%86
.287
.387
.587
.386
.4,
85.1
84.5
84.7
%
°Ext
ende
d da
y fo
r al
l ins
titut
ions
for
all y
ears
.
HE
AD
CO
UN
TF
TE
Non
resi
dent
,T
otal
Num
ier
Num
ber
Cha
ng.
Num
ber
Per
cent
age
Num
ber.
IP
erce
ntag
e
6,30
615
.4%
40;9
38-
, .-%
36,2
86
6,00
213
.843
,384
2,44
66.
038
,114
5,87
312
.746
,215
2,83
16.
540
,333
5,99
8 '
12.5
48,0
381,
823
3.9
41,4
51
6,25
512
.749
,089
1,05
12.
2_
42,3
91
6,78
513
.650
,019
930
1.9
43,7
37
7,32
12-
-14
.949
,061
(958
)(1
.9)
43,5
06
7,62
6'1
5.5
49,1
2665
.143
,313
7,94
515
.3%
61,9
922,
866
-,..,
5.8%
44,9
37
TABLE 2
Utah System of Higher Graduation
Autumn Headcount Enrollment, Resident and Nonresident, By ineitution,,1966-67 Through 197415
1966-67 1967-68 1968-69 1969-70
'Instit Mien No. % No. No. No.II of LI
Resident 14,997 87.0% 15,963 87.5/0 164333 86.'5% 17,719NoAresident
Thal.I 2;249 13.0 - 2,280 12.5 2,542 13.5 2,783
Tit 17,246 TI:Iiii 18,875 20,502
USU - t %
Resident 5,101, 63.2 5,710 67.8 6,400 73.5 6,408Nonresident 2,975 36.8 2,715 32.2 2,310 26.$ 2,130
total; , 8,076 8,435 8,710 8,538
WSCResident 7,205. 95.3 8,103 95.8 8,899 96.7 9,188Nonresident 354 4.7 358 4.2 307 3.3 342t Total l'-dii 8,461. 9,206 9,530
SUSC . .,.
Resident 1,557 88.9 1,613 8,9.8 4" 1,666 91.0 1,550Nonresident 195 11.1 184 10.2 164, 9.0 215
Total 1,752 1,797 ' 1,830 1,765
SnowResident 661 90.7 827 91.5 4391: 90.1 764Nonresident 68 9.3 77 8.5 98 9.9 67
Total 729 S. -WA 4 989 831
01111e ,Resident 778 72.6 709 73.2 891 74.8 898Nonresident 294 27.4 259 26.8 300 21,/0, 317
Total 1,072 968 1,191 1,215
;,, CEU'A
Resident 588 92.6 `61 0, 94.0 ( 687 95.8 650'Nonresident 47 7.4 '"42 6.0 30
`,,4.2 35
Total 635 703 717 ' 6115
"A UTC/P. -
. As. ...
Resident 1,411 95.3' 1,578 97.3 41,575 95.1Nonresident 69 4.7 ,.44 2.7 82 4.9*
Total T.,4110 1 1,622 1,657
UTC/SI.0 "
Resident . 2,334 9.7.7 .. 2,208 98.1 3,000 98.7, 3,163Nopresident 55 2.3 43 1.9 40 1.3 43
Total 2,389 .. 2,251 , 3,040 3,906
USNE - o
Resident 34,632 844 37,382 86.2 40,342 87.3 t 42,040Nonresident - 6,306 15.4% 6,002 13.8% 5,873 12.7% 5.998
Total ---- 40,938 43,384 46,215 411,038
BYU ,Resident 8,062 37.8 8,232 37,7 8,747 37.1 9,701Nonresident 13,292 62.2 13,592- '62.3 14,851 62.9 15,914.
Total., 21,354 21---,1124 23,598 . 25,615
. -Westminstero
ResidentNonresident
Total
,'State of Utah n 0
Resident 43,131 68.5 46,229 70.0 497.50 70.4 52,337Nonresident 19,818 ' 31.5 19,772 30.0 20,961 29.6 22,149
Teta{ 62,949 66,001 70,711 74,4110
437 66.5 615 77.6 661 73.6 596220 -33.5 178 22.4 237 26.4 237
657 793 11911 $33
170066
1,766
Note: All data is extended day'for 411 years.
Source: USHE Enrollment Reports. . 131112
%
86.4%13.6
75.124.9
" f96.4
3.6
.
87.812.2 `
' ,. '
91.98.1
'73.926.1
94.9 0
5.1.
96.33.7 '
4 98.71,3
47.512.5%
37.962.1
71.528.5'
_ 70.329.7
v "
A
fl
OPP'61 L111.94 460'94 %Z. LE US' St %L LE C6 %9 'LE Meta
B'L9 898'0 E.L9 1CL'IS L9s LL' IS .4L'
OWIL OSS'91
861'/6 %O.OE 6S6'ZZ
8'89 °Stec 0.0L HSU
EE6 1St S9L E la SES
CU - SOE l'EE LK 1 'OE LEL 6.6-e LIE I.' a nz e 'L9 8Z9, ' 6:99 69C 6'69 LES 0.19 961 6'LL 609
.,.
ol.
S'96 E S9 LLE'Lt
C PE t61'6
s06'96 896'96 919'96 969'96
0'S9 ELO'Ll L S9 ILL I Z.1/9 960'Ll 6'19 BL/'91
O'SE 681'6 E 'PE 16611 8.SE 00'6 I 'BE 8 11'01
L66'1 S 9E 1 '69 190'6 610'0S, 6110'61,
YoE 'SI , --.S?6'L ,
%S 'S I 9L9'L . %6 'PI ILE 'L %9'El, SgL 9 -5OL'Ll KZ '9
CIFEI LPOIFIF S.1,8 00.11/ I .S8 Oie 1 I/ 1'99 Pete, E'L9 trEirL,
P1P9'S U'S ISE'S 1161'1 Lift Z6 S6 S.1 99 8l 8' LL
1.86 ASS'S 0'86 601/ S'86 W'1" 9'66 081 go6'66 Olt
--A-- 690t A t.
096'E 91P0'6
E.9 C61 ' 6'9 (61 E'S Slr S0I re 69
CE6 9L8'L 1'E6 699'8 L'16 KS' Z 6'S6 188'8 9'96 LL6'
969 fE9 SS S P09 619 6.9 68 6.E CZ WE 1Z S'L
. L ZS
8T6 LK I'96 809 6.96 KG '9'66 KS 8'66 069
9E1'l 06 '1 OS I 9E6'1
8131 616 o'18 LEZ 1 .1Z La '96 0.6Z 6SE
8'18 186 0.61 688 .
6.81 E96 6 'EL 08 0; I L LLB
A
LIPS . 6SL £69 COP 010 E'Ol. 18 L.8 69 L'01 11 ,s, l' l l` 68 6.01 88
1'tS8 09L 8'1,6 L69 8.68 619 6'88 f 1 L 8'68 LLL
0911 0E9' l 651'1 166'1 ' LEO'L
WOE LOC S'OZ ZEE 8.81 868 S'81 9SE L'Ll 6SZ
L'.66 U1'1 S' 6L 886'1 L.18 191'l S'18 la' I E.L8 eu. r
Pal E6E's 01'9 1091 ' Ira% 91r I. if 6'S 061 tr9 SES 4 9.1, 901 0.1, ILE .
Z.S6 C91'8 [1,6 E 1 EI'L 9.86 Ll9 'L IF'S() S6r8 0'96 E06'8
SOS'S 911'9, 8. r 86L'Z 1.08 99VZ
.
S'SZ 9ZZ'Z 11-1PL 161't Ste 900'Z 6.89 L00'9 6'69 L96 'S S'I'L 00'9 0.91 161'9 SS; L 965'9
"ICU . 999'06 SLS'OE
Ike' I L 016'o6
P LI, 61L E 9.L1 869'C 9.Ll Ligt- CSI SPE E ,,
S.,' 1 6E0C
%9'68. S19'Ll %P.69 OEO'L I %968 E'61 'L t %E' /8 810'81 `X,S'S8 188.L1
% 'ON' % IN . % 'AN .°N % ' IN ''
SL.P1,6 PL-EL6 EL-6161 61-1161 111116
la
TA
BLE
3
*aft
Sys
tem
of H
ighe
r E
duca
tion
A S
umm
arya
f Aut
umn
1974
-75
Hea
dcou
nt a
nd F
.T.E
. Stu
dent
s,B
y Le
vel a
rid T
ype
of S
tude
nt
Un
radu
ate
Gra
duat
e 'c
,G
rand
Tot
alA
llS
tude
nts
?ref
lect
iona
l, C
aree
r E
duca
tion,
and
Oth
erV
ocat
iona
l-Tec
hnic
al
Tot
alP
erce
ntag
e
Low
erU
pper
Levi
erU
pper
Tot
alP
erce
ntag
eT
otal
Per
cent
age
Tot
alP
erce
ntag
eT
otal
Per
cent
age
Inst
itutio
nA
. Hea
dcou
ntU
nive
tilfy
of U
tah
10,3
52\4
8.5% \
7,02
632
,8%
' --%
Uta
h. S
tate
Uni
vers
ity4,
339
9.3
' 2,9
1833
.1-
146
1.7
86
Web
er S
tate
Col
lege
4,71
5'4.
02,
361
27.5
1,13
613
.336
2
Sou
ther
n U
tahS
tote
Col
lege
1,13
160
.8 -
558
30.0
i15
28.
2,1
9
'Sno
w C
olle
ge.,
768
90.7
_1 .E
:-
799.
3
C.4
:.D
ixie
Col
lege
891
74.1
312
25.9
.C
olle
ge o
f Eas
tern
Uta
h42
8-'6
8.4
-19
8.
31.6
Uta
h T
ech.
Col
lege
- P
rovo
'337
1-la
)-
-2,
732
89.0
Uta
h T
ech.
Col
lege
- S
alt l
ake
153
2.7
-t.
5,49
197
.3K
Tot
al H
eadc
ount
,
I. F
ull-T
ime
Equ
ival
ent (
F.T
.E j
23,1
1444
,51%
12,1
6324
:7%
10,2
4619
.7%
467
Uni
vers
ity o
f Uta
h10
,186
51.7
%5,
763
29.3
%-
--
%U
tah
Sta
te U
nive
rsity
4,52
952
.4'
2,87
133
.314
71.
7-
Web
er S
tate
Col
lege
'4,0
4961
.33,
145
20.4
1,J0
016
.710
6
Sou
ther
n U
tah
Sta
tea
1,12
864
.546
2.2
6.5
x 13
17.
527
_Sno
w C
olle
ge--
764
90.7
789.
3--
-
Dix
ie C
olle
e74
471
.330
028
. 7-
Col
lege
of E
aste
rn U
tah
344
66.3
-:1
7533
.rW
ohJe
ch. C
olle
ge-P
rovo
-23
60.
92,
138
90.1
-ar
aric
li. C
alle
gew
-Sal
t lak
e65
1.9
-.
3,40
898
.1
Total F.T.E_
22,0
4549
.2%
10,4
4123
.2%
7,47
7,16
.6%
-,
201
Sou
rce:
197
4 A
utum
n E
nrol
lmen
t Rep
ort
Hat
e: U
nkno
wn
unde
rgra
duat
es a
re c
onsi
dere
d as
Fre
shni
en.
1.0
4.2
1.0 .9
%5,
302,
",%
3,75
3
18.7
%21
.364
14.2
8.80
5
8,57
41,
860
-84
71,
203
.62
6r-
Sr9
65,
644
10.2
% 5
1,99
2
19.0
%19
,702
1,62
01
k88,
635
1..6
---
-6,
600
1-.5
1,74
8
-84
2-
-1,
044
519
--
32:4
3774
3
.4%
4,77
310
.6%
44,9
37
,
r
e
TA
BLE
4
Uta
h S
yste
m o
f Hig
her
Edu
catio
n,
'A S
umm
ary
of A
utum
n F
TE
Ext
ende
d D
ay-
Enr
ollm
ents
, by
Inst
itutio
n,19
66-6
7 T
hrou
gh 1
974-
75
1011
1.41
411
1966
-67
1967
-68
1968
-69
1969
-70
1970
-71
1971
-72
1972
-73
,19
73-7
419
74-7
5
U o
f p"
15,8
22
US
U;-
.8,
133
WS
C-
5,83
5
SU
SC
1,65
4
Sno
w73
4
-130
1e"1
,009
CE
U: -
-,
,,58
6
UT
C/P
- 1,
074
UT
C/S
L1,
439
. 16,2
658,
538
6,51
61,
694
867
927
647
1,09
5--
-1,
565
17,0
01
8,61
37;
206
-1,
721
98E
1,11
768
9
1,15
5
1,84
3
18,3
02
8,32
1
-7,,5
201
,65
802
1,13
2'
667
1,11
4
1,92
8
:18
,566
8,20
97,
618
1,89
1
824
1,15
665
5-
1,43
6
2,03
6
19,7
32
-8,5
047,
021
1,82
678
81,
066
546
1,70
9
2,54
5
19,5
31
8,59
765
121,
724
659
1,05
747
0
2,09
42,
862
19,3
91
8,30
86,
620
1,54
275
6
1,00
1
479
2,09
93,
117
.19
,7¢2
°8,
635
6,60
0
1,74
884
2
1,04
451
9.
2,37
43.
473
Tol
d U
SH
E36
,286
38,1
14-
40\;3
43-
41,4
5142
,391
43,7
3743
,506
a43
,313
-44
,937
FT
E: U
nder
grad
uate
s,
45 c
redi
t hO
ulit
per
year
Gra
duat
ed'
a6 c
redi
t hou
rs p
er y
ear
thro
ugh
1970
-71
30 c
redi
t hou
rs p
er y
ear
begi
nnin
g 19
71-7
2
Sou
rce:
Aut
umn
Enr
ollm
ent R
epor
ts
Npc
lude
s m
edic
al s
tude
nts
UofURes
Nonres
Total
USURes
NonresTotal
WSCRes
Nonres
Total
SUSCRes
Nonres
Total
SnowRe's
Nonres
Total
DixieRes
Nonres
Total
TABLES
Utah System of Higher Eckitation
A Comparison of Autumn Headcount EnrollmentsBy Student Level-and Residency, 1973 and 1974
Entering Freshmen° Advanced Freshmen Sophomores Juniors
% % fY0 %1973 1974, Change 1973 1974 Change 1973 1974 Chcire 1973 1974 Change
2650 2719, 2.6% 2734 2977 8.9% 2742 2870 4.7% 2820 2760 (2.1 %),653 649 (.6) 372 431 15.9 628 662 5.4 542 541. (.2)
3303 3368 2.0 3106 3408 9.7 3370 3532 f.$ 3362 3301 (1.8)
1364 % 11436 5.3% 573 568 (.9%) 882 967 9.6% 1129 1071. (5.1%)367 649 76.8 3'59 263 (26:T) '416 48k 16.8 347 374 : 7.82)
1731 2085 20.5 932 831 (101) 1 1298 1453 11.9 )476 1445, (2.1) :
1808 1774 '(1.9%) 1967 2277 15.8% 150811 ° 1491 (1.1%) 1228 .1,175 (43%)151 116 (23.2) 79 96 21.5 1071+ 97 (9.3) 78 58 (25.6).
1959 1490 (3.5) 2046 2373 16.0 1615 1588 (1.7) 13016 1233 (5.6)
389 506 30.1% 172 247 43.6% 242 247 2.1% 220 228 3.6%109 141 29.4 53 71 34.0 69 ' 71 2.9 60 4# (ap) ..
498 0) 647 29.9 / 225 318 41.3 311 318 2:3 280 ., 276 (1.4)
438 470 7.3% . 94 96 2.1% 165 ' 194. 17.6% '-33 , 49 48.5 16 23 43.8 13 15 15.4
471 519 10,2 110 119 8.2 178 209 17.4 -I
499 642 28.7% 118 151 28.0% 197 ; 191 (3.0%)
' 1s34 135 .7 45 45 .0.0 57 39 (31.6) - -'633 777 22.7 163
..
196 20.2\---._
254 230 (9.4) - -°Assumes unknown evening students ore entering freshmenbUndergioduotes only
.
4
13.3116.
0 ,0
0
0
Seniors Graduates Unclassified!) , totals
1973
3019480
1 1974
3176549
0/0
Change
12%14.4 .7-
1973
3042951
ok
19741Change
3105 2.1%881 (7.4) .
1973
232
1 15174
386
ok
Change
65.2%200.0
1973
7030628'
1974
176453719
%Change
3.6%2.5 "
3499 3725 6.5 ,
1287 , 1228 (4.6%),310 331 6.8
3993' 3986 (.2)
668 683 2.2%607 633 4.31
25 44 76.0
64 5i4 (15.6%)160 62 (61.3)
2"58 21364 3.4
67 -6007 -7°4 '2 66 279E1 9.0
1597 1559 .(2.4)
1302 Al.,46 11.1%7,5 . 44 (41,3)
1275 1316 3.2
- -..- -
'124 116 (4$.2)
-$
7:13
33 8805 3 g.
,43 8163 '4.5%
'0 41.1 .(16.11
1377 1490 8.2
.262 245 (6.5%)41 56 36.6
-
-.
....t -=,(100.0%)- - -
83 3 8574 34'
1 18 1473 14:4%
3(2 387- 16.6
,303 301 (.7) -
-
,.
- (100.0)
-
16
6
1
1860, 144;8
.A
7 760 9.0%2 87 40.3
-
,- -
.---
-- 75 L -(100.0%)1 -- (100.0)
7
8,92;7
9 847 11.6%.
984 10.7%219 (7.6)
- --`,\ 76 - (100.0) 11 6 1203. 6.8
117
CEU
Res
Nonres
Total
UTC-Pro' oRes
Nonres
"Joto31
Res
Nonres
Total
USHE TotalRes
Nonres
Total
8.Y.0 J,
Res
Nonres
Tothl
71atm* instRes
Nonres
.. Total
State of Ut"Res
Nonres
Total
TABLE 5 cont.)
Entering Freshmen° Advanced Freshmen Sophomore's Juniors1,41 % % % ^r , .%
1973 1974 Change 1973 1974 Change 1973 1974 Change 1973 1974 Change
359 258 (28.1%). 81 165 103.7% 168 164 (2.4%) - -15 13 (13.3) 6 17 183.3 4 9 125.0
374 271 (27,5) 87 182 109.2 172 a 173 .6 -'
1851 1912 3.3% (-192 5j6 39.3% 326 4-1-8 28.2% ' -137 101. (26.3) 31 72 132.3 23 20 (13.0) -
1988 201,3 1.3. 423 618 46.1 349 431 25.5 - -3691 4063 10.1% 569 980 72.2% 379 509 34.3% - . - -
60 54 (10.0) 19 20 5,3 16 18 12.5 -3751, 411.7 9.8 588 1000 70.1 _395 527 33.4. - --.
-13049 13780 .5.6% 6700 8007 19,5% 6609 7051 '6.7% 5397 5234 (3.0%)
V659 ., 1907 114.9, 980 1038 5.9 1333 '1417 6.3 1027 1021 (.6)14708 15687
06.7 7680, 9045 -17.8 1942 8468
: -
6.6 "6424, 6255 (2.6),
t) .,1346 129T (0.9%) 1516 1706 12.5% 1712 '1831 7.9% 1546 '1469 (5.0%)3069 3017 (1.7) 2219 . 2678 :20.7 3841 3833 (.2) 3592 3343 (6.9)4415 4310 (2.4) 3735 434 17.4 5553 5664 2.0 5138 4812 (6.3)
Ir%
120 1 1 4 , (5.0%) 28 60, 114,3% 132 129 P.3%) 1050 1 1 1 5.7%94 109 16.0 11 5 54.5 . ,. 63 81 28.6 60.. '63 5.0
214 223' 4.2 39 65' 66.7 195 ' 210 7.7 ' 165 174 5.5
A \ .-`'+ .
14515 15187 4.6% 8244 9773\18.5% 8453 9011 6.6% 7048 6814 (3.3%)4827 5033 4.4 '321-0 . ^ 3721 15.9 s 5237 5331 efil 4679 4427 (6.4)
19337. 20220 4.6 11;454 13494 17.8 1'3690 T4342 4.8 11727 11241 (4,1) ''".Assumes unknown evening students ore entering freshmen,i-bUndergroduOfes only
)
1 3 7
1 18
Sailors ".. Graduates Unclassifialb Totals
1973 1974'44/3--,
Chang. 1973 1974%
Chang. 1973 .1974%
Chang. 1973 1974%.
Chang
- -, 608n 587 (3,5%)- - - - - 25 19 56.0
- 1 - - - 633 626 (1.1)
- - - -2569 2876 .12.0%- .. - - 191 193 1.0
- - - - - 2760 3069 11.2 .
1
- - , 4639 55,§2 ;19.7,,%95 92 (3.2)
- ... - - 4 4734 5644 19.2
..5870 6095 3.8% 3710 3788 2.1% 165 , 92 (44.%) 41500 44047 6.1%
906 980 8.2 1558 1514 (2.8) 163 68 (58.3) 7626 ' 7945 4.2
6776 7075 :4.4 5268 5302 .6 3 160.(5,1.2) 49126 51992 ,5.11
2086 ;1517 (27.3%) ,,g, 916 896 (8.2%) / 480 00.0`Yo 9182 91'92 .1%
3418 31)0 (9.0) 884 1433 28.2 209 100.0 17023 17323 1.8
5504 4627 (15,9) -1860 2029 9.1 689 100.0 26205 26515 1.2
C$
1(.13 101 (24.1 %)" - 113 121.6% 569 628 10.4%
5,4 47 03,0) - .10.51 - - 282' 305 8.2
187 1411 . (20.9) 51 # 113 121 6-.
451 933 9.6
8089 7713 (4.6%) 4686 4684 (0.0%) 2169 685 217.1% 51251 53867 5.1%
4378 4137 (5.5) 2442 2647 8.4 163 277 69.9 24931 25573 2.6
0461 11850 (4.9) 7128 7331 2.8 379 962 153.8 76182 79440 4.3
1.
°183119
6
TABLE 6
Utah System of Higher Education
Utah Residents Entering as Freshmen°, Autumn Headcount 1974,,As a Percentage of Utah High School Graduates by County,
Spring 1974
Rich58%(18)
(16343%7
organ ;J./36%,.-(37dt\ Summit
`( 56%
Salt Lake Is(76) .... ----
114% " pf ,.., ,./...." / i6821) `;,.. al
t*44Q,' i Wasatch I. Duchesne 1
%..., , A9% I..A . (55) 35°/c. I
N79), v ;Utah )1
( 1 93 1 ) . st.
LA 75 100%
NM 60 74%
0 59%
* USHE Institution
48%
Beavir'48%(3,9)
Iron99%(213)
Washingtop""2
128%(377)
I
Carc-orr-75% e(226)
)Saripetel
99% i(223) 1 I Grand
45%
66e5%;
y45%t
Sevier(37)
(108) 1
4, Daggett
""-,/r I
Uintah25%(49)
$.
N.\ Piute ( Wayne`It) 52% 1 " 58°4( 1`
/$ (12) (21). _..s.-----.......I
Kane60%(32)
Garfield68%(51)
Son Juan46%(54)
%Includes USHE Institutions, BYU and Westminster. The number of high school graduates in any one county becouse of residency changes and delayld entrance from prior years.
Source: USHE Autumn Enrollment Report, 1974High School Iritentioris Suriey, 1974
1 3 )120
1
.7
TABLE 7
Utah System of Higher Education
A Summary of Student Credit Hour. Loads,Autumn, 1974
Institutions
Students Enrolling For:
12 or MO.f Credits 7 to 11 Credits Less Than 7 Ctedits
Per-
Number tentagea Per-.
Numbs tentagePer-
Number centage
University of Utah 15,396 72.07% 3)077 44.40% ' 2,891 13,53%
Utah Stote University 7,458 84.70 ' 591 6:71 756 8.59
Weber State College 5,346 62.35 1,390 16.21 1,838 21.44
Southern Utah State Col. 1,569 84,46 133 7.15 158 8.49
Snow College, 70 92.44 43 5.08. 21 2.48
Dixie College 1,038 86.?8 -99 8.23. 66 5.49
College of Eastern Utah 426 68.6 ,') 49 7.83 151 24.12
Utah Tech. Col., Provo 1,797 58.55 213 6.94 1,059 34.51
Utah Tech. Col., S.L, ' 2,279 40.38 , 411 7.28 2,954 52.34
Utah System of Higher
Education 36,092 69.42% 6,006 11.55% 9,894 1'19.03%
Source: U.S.14.E. Enrollment Reports, 1974
a
4
1. o
121
fi
a,
TA
BLE
8
Uta
h S
yste
m o
f Hig
her
Edu
catio
nA
Sum
mar
y of
SC
H P
rodu
ced,
By
Levi
! of C
ours
e,,
Aut
umn
1974
A
lidae
rsity
Uta
h S
tate
Wei
mer
Sou
ther
n U
tah
Sno
wD
ixie
Col
lege
, of
Uta
h T
ech.
Uta
h T
edt.
Uta
h S
yste
m o
fC
ount
* Le
vel'
of U
tah
Uni
vers
ity S
tate
Col
lege
, Sta
te C
ollo
gii C
ello
s*C
allo
w"
Eas
tern
Uta
h-
Pro
ve.
Sal
t Lak
e H
ighe
r E
duca
tion
1. P
re-1
00 (
Pre
-Col
lege
) Le
vel
.N
o. o
f SC
H1,
375
309
6926
034
08,
327
17,5
25 ,
21,2
05%
of T
otal
SC
H-
1.10
%.3
1%-
.55%
1.66
%4.
37%
3.37
'33
.63%
3.26
%C
umul
ativ
e P
erce
nt-
1.10
%.3
1%-
.55%
1.66
%4.
37%
3.73
%33
.63%
3.26
%2.
100
Lev
el-
-..
No.
,of S
CH
137,
595
53,8
5667
,015
13,0
8810
,619
12,6
71'
6,86
627
,148
28,1
3235
7.00
1%
of T
otal
SC
H49
.71%
43.2
8%67
.69%
49.9
0%8-
4.26
%80
.95%
88.2
1%76
.23%
:53
.99%
54.9
1%C
umul
ativ
e P
erce
nt49
.71%
44.3
8%68
.00%
49.9
0%84
.81%
82.6
1%92
.58%
79.9
6%87
.62%
58.1
7%3.
200
Lev
elN
o. o
f WI
15,1
9414
,895
9,91
3 .1
-5.
799
1,91
6.
2,72
257
87,
136
6,45
064
.603
% o
f Tot
al S
CH
5.49
%11
.97%
10.0
1%22
.11%
15.1
9%19
.39%
7.42
%20
.04%
12.3
8%9.
94%
-
Cbr
nula
tive
Per
cent
55.2
0%56
.35%
78.0
1%72
.01%
100.
00%
100.
00%
...
100.
00%
100.
00%
100.
00%
68.1
1%4.
300
Love
!N
o. o
f SC
H52
,131
21,5
0616
,555
5,48
8-
--
--
95.6
80%
of T
otal
SC
H18
.83%
17.2
8%16
.72%
20.9
2%"
--
-14
.72%
Cum
ulat
ive`
Per
cent
74.0
3%73
.63%
94.7
3%92
.93%
--
82.8
3%5.
400
Lew
dN
o. o
f SC
H7,
6113
,447
5,20
81,
854
--
--
28,1
41-
% o
f Tot
al S
CH
2.76
%10
.81%
5.27
%7.
07%
--
-4.
33%
Cum
ulat
ive
Per
cent
76.7
9%84
.4.4
%50
0.00
%10
0.00
%-
--
--
87.1
6%6.
500
Leve
tN
o. o
f SC
H34
,813
11,9
67-
--
--
46,7
80%
of T
otal
501
12.5
8%9.
62%
--
--
-7.
19%
Cum
ulat
ive
Per
cent
89.3
7%94
.06%
--
--
-94
.35%
9. T
otal
SC
H P
rodu
ced:
276,
764
124,
446
, 99,
000
26,2
2912
,615
15,6
537,
754
35,6
1152
,107
650,
209
7. 6
00 L
ewd
No.
of S
CH
20,0
80 T
h\49
59-
-1..
---
--
26,0
39%
of T
otal
SC
H7.
26%
=4.
79%
--
--
-_
r4.
00%
Cum
ulat
ive
Per
cent
96.6
3%98
.85%
--
--
--
-98
.35%
S. 7
00 L
evel
.
'N
o. o
f SC
H.
9,31
91,
441
--
--
10,7
601/
4 of
Tot
al S
CH
3.37
%1.
15%
--
--
-1.
65%
cum
ulat
ive
Per
cent
100.
00%
100.
00%
--
-c
--
-10
0.00
%
:Sou
rce:
U.S
.H.E
.,Aut
umn
Enr
ollm
ent R
epor
ts 1
974
-TA
BLE
- 9
*.
-
Uta
h S
yste
m o
fE
duca
tion
A S
umm
ary
of S
tude
nts'
Age
s, jl
y In
stitu
tion,
/A
utum
n, 1
974
'
W.S
.C.
3,77
043
.97%
Age
of S
tude
nts
)U
. of U
.U
.S.U
.
1. U
nder
22
Yea
rsa.
Num
ber
9,35
6' 5
,221
b. P
erce
nt o
f Hea
dcou
nt43
.79%
-,
59.3
0%
' 2. A
ges
22 T
hrou
gh 2
9o.
. Num
ber
9,38
13,
018
b. P
erce
nt o
f Hea
dcou
nt43
.91%
34.2
8%
c. C
umul
ativ
e P
erce
nt87
.70%
93.5
8%
3. A
ges
30 T
hrou
gh 3
9-
a. N
umbe
r1,
749
439
b. P
erce
nt o
f Hea
dcou
nt8.
19%
'4.
99%
c. C
umul
ativ
e P
erce
nt'9
5.89
%98
.57%
4. O
ver
39 Y
ears
o. N
umbe
r83
112
7
b. P
erce
nt o
f Hea
dcou
nt3.
89%
1.43
%
c. C
umul
ativ
e P
erce
nt99
.78%
100.
00%
5. U
nkno
wn
Age
sa.
Num
ber
47-
b. P
erce
nt o
f Hea
dcou
nt.2
2%
c. c
umul
ativ
e P
erce
nt'
100.
00%
-6.
All a. N
umbe
r21
,364
8,80
5
Sou
rce:
U-S
.H.E
. Aut
umn
Enr
ollm
ent R
epor
ts19
74
3,23
337
.71%
81.6
8%
1,06
412
.41%
94.0
9%.
487
;
5.68
%99
.77%
20 .23%
I-10
0.00
%
8,57
4
S.U
.S.C
.S
now
\
Dix
ie'
C.E
,U.
U.T
.C. -
P.'
U.T
.C--
S.L
- ...
B.Y
.U.
4.1,
215
65.3
2%
717
84.6
5%
873
72.5
7%
355
56.7
1%1,
496
1,83
6
48.7
5%32
.53%
.
.14,
216
53;6
1%,
503
6810
713
795
02,
289
-9,8
14
27.0
4%8.
03%
8.89
%21
.88%
30.9
5%40
.56%
37.0
1% .
92.3
6%92
.68%
81.4
6%78
.59%
79.7
0%73
.09%
90.6
2%.
-,
677
1661
320
886
753
3.60
%.8
3%1.
33%
9.74
%1
.%
15.7
0%2.
84%
'
95.9
6%93
.51%
82.7
9%88
.33%
90.1
3%88
.79%
93.4
.6%
'45
2-
12,
2725
9 \
588
299
2.42
%.2
4%1.
00%
4.31
%8.
44%
\10
.42%
1.1,
3%
98.3
8%93
.75%
83.7
9%92
.64%
98.5
7%99
.21%
.94
.5
30.-
,..53
195
4.6
-44
4511
33
1.62
%6.
25%
16.2
1%7.
36%
1.43
%\
.79%
5.41
%",
/
100.
00%
1C10
.00%
100.
00%
100.
00%
100.
00%
100.
00%
100.
00%
,...
1,86
044
71,
203
626
3,06
9"
, 5,6
4426
,515
TABLE 10
Utah System of Higher Education
Autumn Reside It Headcount4Enrollments, by County and Institution,With Percentages of County Students at Each Institution, 1973 & 1974.
aver1973 .
1974Off
2.. Faarider19731974
Deft3. Cache
19731974
Deft4. Cailson
19731974
Off-3713Figgelt
19731974.
Duff
-6. Wave19731(77A
Duff7. Ducfiesn
19731974
Deft11.,-Emery
/197A
973
Duff9. arfield
1973 6 4 51974 12 9.0
Diff 100.0%10. Grand
1973 32 78.11974 40 35 0
Deft 25 0%11. Iron
1973 34 4 71974 25 3 I
Off (26.5%)12. Juab
1973.. II 8.91974 II 7 8
Drff 0.0%Kane
1973 o 5 5 51974 3 3.2
Diff 40 0%)ar
1973 15 4 41974 22 6
Diff 46 7%15. Morgan
1973 6 3 61974 9 5 A
Off .50 0%
Univeisities
U.U. U.S.U..
INo. 1 % No. %
Four-Year Colleges
W.S.C. S.U.S.C.
No. I 0/ No. %
16 14 7% 11 10 1% 1 .9%17 142 8 67 3 2.5'
6.3% (_27.3%) 200.0%
1;125 11 1 44-8 39 5IT? 12 6 . 434 39 3
11 2% _L3 1%1 (3 70,,,,L
44 40.3%47. 39.1
6.8%
TwoYear
Snow Dixie
No. I % No.
-% 3 2.8%1 .8 5 4.2
100.0% 66.7%
355 3144 . 2 .2 2 .2 3 i .3342 31.0 2 .2 16 1.4 5 .5
0.0% 700.0% 66.7%
0 *72 2 6 ', 2,518 90.1 66 2.4 4 1 9 .3 3 .184 2 9 . 2,628 89.6 79 2.7 . 6 .2 7 .2 8 .3
16 7% 4.4% ' 19.7% 50.0% (22.2%) 166.7%r 4-98 145 36 5391 13 5 29 4.3
(7 I%) (19.4%)t-
1,147 26.21,200 26.1
4.6°4
3 27.32 25.0
(33.3'41
. 19 2.8 1 .1 4 .618 2.7 6 .9
(5 3%) 500.0% (100.0%)
1 .1
2 .3100.0%
1 18.2 - 9.1 3 9.11 12.5 - - ., I 12.5
0.0% .0.0% i__ (66.7%)
456 10,4 1,788 40.7 26 .6450 9.8 1,878 40.7 42 .9
_LI .3%1 5.0% 61.5%
18 8.7 55 26.6 11 5.3 5 2.421 9.8 45 21 0 15 7.0 7 3.3
16 7% (182 %1 36.4% 40.0%-22 I 1 2 29 14.714 8.9 26 16.6
(36.4%1 u_o 3%)
17 12810 7.5
(41.2%)
24 21 1
24 21.10.0
41 5 736 4.5
(12
16 13.019 13 5
18 8%
8 889, 9.5
125%
31 .730 .7
(3.2%)
-2 25.0
100.0%
25 .626 .6
4.0%
6 2.9 6 2.97 3.3 10 4.7
16.7% 66.7%
3 1.5 2 1.0 9 4.6' 3 1.53 1.9 5 3.2 12 7.6 3 1.9
100.0% 150.0% 33.3% 0.0%
2 1.52 1.5
0.0%
10 8.83 2.6
(70 0%)
4 .617 2.1
325.0%
7 5.7I., 7 5.0
0.0%
5 5.55 5.3
0.0%
46 34.559 44.0
28.3%
4 3.56 5.3
sp.o°(.
584 78.5660 81.713.0%
9 7.314 9.9
55.6%
33 36.242 4.41
27.3%
62.18161' 177
(1.6%)
31 18.729 17.4
(6.5%)
10 2.910 2.9
0.0%
105 63.3'102 61.0
(2.9%)
3 2.3-2 1.5
(33.3%)
4 3.52 1.8
1.50.0%)
- -1 .1
100.0%
15 12:211 -7.8
(76'.2%).
2 2.2
(100.0 %I
17 14.44 3.0
(76.5%)
3 2.64 3.5
33.3%
7 1.08 1.0
14.3%
5 4.110 7.1
100.0%
9 9.95 5.3
(44.4 %)
67 19.6 19 5.6 18 5.350 14.5 21 6.1, 10 2.9
(25.4%1 10.5% (44.4%)
-4.3 1.85 3.0
66.7%
2 1.2-(100.0%)
A
Si
Colleges VocTisch.- -UJC,Ir
Colleges
UTC-.51.
Private Institutions
BYU
State of Utah
CEU Westminster County totals % ofState
No. I % No. % No. 1 % No. 1 % No. % No. 0/.
- -*/0
I7 6.4% 3 2.8% 24 22.0% - -% 109 100.0% .1%
- - II 9.2 4 3.3 24 20.0k - 120100.0 .2
57.1% 49.3% 0,0% 10.1%
3. .3 5 .4 23 2.0 159 14.1 0 6 1,131 100.0 1.5
1 1 5 .5 19 1.7 134 12.1 7r
1,104 100.0 1.4
(66.7 %) 0.0% (17.4%) (15. 7T) 16.7% (2.4%)
1 12 .4 26 .9 87 3.1 ' 1 .0 2,799 100.0 3.7- - . 20-' .7 27 _9 .71 2.4 2 .1 2,932100.0 3.7
(100.0%) 66.7% 3.8% (18.4%) 100.0% 4.8%
452 66.8 13 1.91
12 1.8 41 6.1 - - 677 100.0 .9
455 67 8 13 1 9 19 2.8 18 5.7 1 .1 672 100.0 .8
.7% 0.0% 58.3% (7.3%) 100 0%. (.7%)..e____- -- 1 9.1/,- - 3 27.2
2 25.0---. 11 100,0
8 100.00.00.0
--,. (100.0%) . 93.3%) - (27.3%)
5 7 .2 303 6.9 567 12.9 31 .7 4,386 100.0 5.8
5 1 8 .2 363 7.9 565 (2.2 38 .8 4,605 100.0 5.8
0.0% 14.3% 19.8% (.4%) 22.6% 5.0%'?
5 2.4 35 ,16.9 6 2.9 5,6 27.1 4 1.9 . 207 100.0 .3
. 11 5.1 30 14.0 5 2.3 6.1 28.6 2 .9 214 100.0 .3
1200% 4. 3%) (16.7%) 8.9% (50.0%) 3.4%
59 30.0
___e
12 6.1 17 8.6 41 20.8 - 197 100.0 3.3
51 32.5 10 6.4 9 5.7 24 15.3 - - 157 100.0 .2
(13.6%) 116.7%),_ (47.1%) (41.5%) - (20.3%)
1 . .8 16 12.0 3 2.3 22 16.5 - - 133 100.0
- - 20 14.8 4 3.0 21 15.7 - - 134 100.0
1100 0°Zol 25.0% ' 33:3% (4,5%) .87%
11 9.6 8 7.0 1 .9 16 14.0 1 114 100.0 .1
12 10.5 5. 4.11 3., 2.6 14 12.3 1 .9 114 100.0 .1
9 1% (37.5%) 200.0% (12.5%) . 0.0% 0.0%
- 21 2.9 ..7 1.0 40 5.6 - - 738 100.0 .9
. 17 21 1 .1 43 5.3 808 100.0 1.0
-1 .8
119. 0%1_, (85.7%) 7.5°/0 1 9.5%
30 24.5 2 1 6 25 20.3 2 1.6 ., 123 100.0 .2
45 3.1.9 1 .7 '23 16.3 - - 141 100.0 .2
(100.6%) . 50 0% (50.0 %) (8.0%) (loom%) 14.6%
- 5 5.5 2 2.2 22 24.2 - - "91 100.0 .1
7 7.4 2 2.1 22 23.1 - 95 100.0 .1
40 0% 0.0% 0.0% - 4.4%
I- 55 16.1 4 1.2 ' 91 26.5 1 :3 342 100.0 .4
1 . 3 78 22.7 4 1.2 86 25.0 1 .3 344 100.0 .4
100 0% 4J 8% 0.0% 15.5LY.) 6`713% .6%
1 .6 3 1.8 15 9.0 - - 166 100.0
2 1 2 - 4, 2,-4 16 9.6 - - 167 100.0
100.0% 33.3% 6.7% .. - .6°/.
TABLE *10 "(cont.)
Universities
County
16. Nut*1973 9 23 I
1974 6 14.6Diff (33 3%)
17. llich1973 8. 11 41974 8 14 5
Diff 0.0%111. Salt Lake
1973 -) 3,121 62.31974 12,830 59.3
Doffn Juan19731974
Dolf20. ianpete
19731974
U.U.
N.1) % No.
Four-Year Colleges
W.S.C. S.U.S.C. Snow
No. T '/o T % No.1 %
2 491000%
15 38 512 29.3
(20.0 %)
1. (2 2%)
i 27 13641 21 )
51.9%
45 9 635 6 7
Diff I (22,2 %)21. Sevier
'1973 41 I-1 21974 34 10 4
Dff (171 %)2 -Summit
1973 65 28.41974 54 23 3
t:sift.(16,9%)
23. Too1973 178 30.6 110 19.01974 ' 162 25.6 9.8 15.6
Diff. (9.0%)24. Uintah
19731974
Diff25. Uiuh
1973 429 5.41974 430 5 0
Diff. .2%26. Wasatch
1973 26 12.21974 18 11 3
D.11
asKingtori71973 37 4 91974 27 3 3
Diff + (27.0%). Wayne
1973 6 9.8'- 1974 5 8 5_
wax,Diff (16 7%)
1971 481 7 81974 443 7 0
Diff (7 9%)30. 611
1973 44',537 17 1 2,566 9 61974 5.549 19 8 2,804. 10 0
Dff 213% 9 3%Mond 'total
1973 2 658 27.1 8,533 11 21974 I 21 364 26 9 8,1305 11 1
I 34o 31%°Includes unkno.wn, as well as nonresident, students
32 45.821 38.1
1.34.4%)
es 12 17.1 I 1.4 -14 255-
16.7 (100.0%)
1,004 4.8 339 1.6 112 .51,058 4.9 315 1.5 154 .7
5 4% (7 I%..) 37.5%
23 H 6 6 3.0 8 4.014 7.4 10 5.3 9 4.8
(3'9.1%) 66.7% l 12.5%
78 16.7 14 3.064 12.3 7 1 3
(17.9%) (500 %)
74 20.3/ 11 3.070 21.5 5 1 5
(5.4%) (54.5%)
35 15.4 30 13.235 15.2 27 11 7
0.9% 00.01°1 .
Two-Year
124 .6130 .64.8%
Dixie
No. We'
2 5.11 2.4
(50.0%)
7 10.03 5,5
(57.1%)
177 .8170 .8
<4..0 %)
18 9.115 8.0
(.16i7%)
9 1.9 176 37.717 3.3. 257 49.5
8:.9% 46.0%
5 15.371 21.8
26.8
1
5 240(3,0%
39 10.729 8.9
(25.6%)44$
9 3.97 3.0
(22,2%.)
9 4.58 4.3
(11.1%)
3 .64, .8
33.3%
17 4,716 4.9
(519%)k.
A 7 3.18 p 3.5
1
36 6.2 18 3.1 8 1.4 , 14 2.450 7.9 20 3.2 23 3.7 3.0\
3.8.9% 1 I .1cy2_ 1 874:Ys _ 25.7°4_
41 17.4 46 19.7 7 3.0 13 5.5 5 2.1 9 3.8 \'34 15.5 55 25.1 7 3.2 8 3.7 \ 7 3.2 I .5
(17.1%) 19.6% 0.0% (38.5%0 40.0% (88.9%)
329 4.2 53 .7 97 1.2 143 1.8 t 80 1.0290 3.4 39 'A5.. 99 1.2 142 1.7 ' 115 1.3
((1.9%) 126._49 %). , ,_ __L PLa. ( 7%) 43.8%
34 16.0 6 2.8 3 1.4 1 .5 6 2.8,32 20..1 8 5.0 2 1 3 8 5.0
7.(59 %) , 1 33.3% C33.3%), 700.0% (100.0%) '
43 5.7 5 .7 103 13.7 3 .431 3.8 13 1.6 112 13.6 2 .2
(27.9%) 160 0% 8.7% (33.3%)
20 32.8 2 3.3 15 24.623 39 0 2 3 4 4 6.8
15.0% I 0 0% 173.3%)
384 6.2.). 4,905 792 10 .2398 6.2 5,181 81.3 14 23.6% 56% ' 40.0%
490 1 8 332 1 3411 1.5 387 1.4
(161 %) 16.6%
8,303 10 9 1,620 2.18,574. 10 8 1,860 2.3
3 3% L 14.8%
126
4 6.610' 16.8
150.0%
57 .914 2
(.75.4%)
62 287 .3
40.3%
430 57.3516 62.420.0%
-2 3.4
100.0%
12 .219 .3
513% .
248 .9219 .8
(11.7%)
759 1.0 1,126 1.5847 1 1 1,203 1.5
11 6% 6.8%
Collogos Voc-Tech Colloatts
CEU
No. %
UTC-P
No. L%UTC-51.
No.
2' 5.11 -2.4
(50.0%).
3 4.32 3!I6
(33.3%)
3 7 75 12 2
66 7%
2 293 55
50 0%t32 2 29 1 3,947 18 7
23 I 28 I 4,752 22 0(28,1%) (3 4%) 204%
16 8.1 12 6.1 10 5,1
, B 4.3 13 6 10 5.3-' (50 0%) 8 3% 0.0%
36 77 10 2 1
37 7 1 9 1.72B% (I0.0 %)
3 8 17 4.7 12 3.3- 13 40 8 2.5
(100 0%) (23.5 %).-(33.3%)'
1 4 12 20 8.823 10.0 15 6.5
(100.0%) 91 7% (15.0%)
3 4 7 99 $17 01 0 15 2.4 153 24 2
200 0°,0 275 0% 54.5%
4 17 25 106 10 4.33 14 27 123 10 46
(25O 8 0% 0.0%
_ 8 I 2,101 26.7 54 .7
5 I 2.363 27 7 70 .8
(37 5) 12 5% 29.6%4-49 23.0 5 2 338 23 9 6 3 8
(22 4 %) 20 0%
14 1 9 10 1 3
19 23 6 7
35 7% (40 0%)
4 66 2 3 32 34 2 3 4 --
100 0% (50 0%)ti (100 0%) ,
3 00 34 5 43 7
2 00 21 3 45 7
(33 3%) (38 2%) 4 7%t-25 191 7, 95 4
39 193 7 92 3
56 0% 1 0% (3 2%)
633 8 2,760 3 6 4,7,34 6 2 ;626 8 3,069 3 9 5,644 7 1 ;
(I 1O1 2 19 2% J
Private Institutions
BYU
No. %
7 17 9,14 342
100 0%
5 7.14 7.3
(20.0%)
1,739 8.21,632 7 5
(6 2%)
69 34.960 31,9
(13.0 %)
96 20.589 17 I
(7,3%)
95 26.079 24.2
(16.8%)
46 20,255 23.7
19.6%
107 18.481 1.2.9
(24. 3%)
74 31 565 29.6
(12 2%
4,574 513.1
4,981 y58.28.9%
BO 37.644 27.7
(45.0 %)
-106 14 1
99 120( 6 6% )
8 13.09 153
12 5%
23'5 3 8238 3 713%
17.755 66.817,921 64 0
9%
Westminster
No. I %
1 26
(1000 %)
474 12547 25
15,4%
State of Utah
39 100.0'41 100.0
5.1% ,
70.100.0 .1
55 100.0 .1
(21.4%)
21,098100.0 27.721,639100.0 27.2
2.6%
19a100.0 .3188 100.0 .2
(5.1%)
I .2 468 100.0 .61 2 520-100.0 .7
0.0% IL 1%
- 365 100.0 .5
1 3 326 100.0 .4100.0% (10.7%)
,2 9 228 100.0 .32, .9 ?31 100.0 .3
0.0% 1.3%
5 9 581 100.03 5 630 100.0
8.4%1_40 0%)-r
I 4
2 ' 9100 0%
8
7
(12.5 %j
3 1.43 19
0.0%
235 100.0 .3219 100.0 .3
(6.8%)
7,876 100.0 10.38,541 100.0 10.8
8.4%
213 100.0 .3159 100.0 .2
(25 4%)
751 100.0 1.0I 1 826 100 0 1.0
100.0% 10.0%
61 100.0 .1
59 100.0 1
(3.3%),,
28 6,192 100.0 8.1
9 1 6,384 100.0 8.03.1%
282 1 1 26,583 100.0 34.8305 1 1 28,007 100.0 35.28.2% 5.4%
26,205 34.526,515 33 3
1 2%
. 851 I 1 76,182 100.0 100.0933 1 2 79,440 100.0% 100.0%9.6%
146127
TA
BLE
11
Uta
h S
yste
m o
f Hig
her
Edu
catio
n
In-S
tate
, Out
-of-
Sta
te a
nd F
orei
gn S
tude
nts
As
a P
erce
ntag
e of
Tot
al E
nrol
lmen
t,A
utum
n H
eadc
ount
, 197
1-72
Thr
ough
197
4-75
1971
-72
1973
-74
1974
-75
Res
iden
tN
onre
side
nt.
Res
iden
tN
onre
'den
tR
esid
ent
Non
resi
dent\ \
Res
iden
tN
onre
side
ntIn
Out
-of
InO
ut-o
fIn
Out
-of
Inst
itutio
nS
tate
Sta
teF
orei
gnS
tate
Sta
teF
orei
Sta
teS
tate
For
eign
Sta
teS
tate
For
eign
InO
ut-o
f
U o
f U$4
.3%
14.2
%1.
5%82
.4%
-16
.0%
1.6%
82.5
%15
.5°.
2.0%
U.S
.U.
7)3,
417
.93.
774
.520
.1.5
.469
.923
.2 f
6.9
0."
W.S
.C.
93.
5.6
.693
.55.
8.7
94.1
-5.
0.9
Vi
S.U
.S.C
.81
.4,
17.7
.881
.417
.7.9
9.5
19.8
.7..-
...1
Sno
w88
.911
.0.,
.188
.710
.8.5
91.:
7.4
.8D
ixie
-73
.925
.01.
077
,021
.9\
1.1
79.0
19.3
1.7
C.E
.U.
92.4
3.8
3.6
95.8
2.6
\1,7
696
.11.
42.
5U
.T.C
./P.
92.8
5.7
1.5
94.7
4.5
93.1
6.0
.9U
,.T.C
./S.L
.C.-
98.5
1.2
.398
.51.
41
98.0
.8
Tot
al U
.S.H
.E.
86.4
12.1
1.5
85.0
13.1
1.9
\ 84.
413.
2.4
B.V
.U.
35.8
159.
34.
9 ..
35.4
60.3
4.3
5 0
60.4
\4.
6W
estm
inst
er68
.129
.22.
770
.027
.72.
330
.8.
N 2
.4S
tate
of U
tah
68.2
%29
.1%
2.7%
' ,67.
0%30
.1%
2.9%
67.3
%29
.6%
\3.1
%
Sou
rce:
U.S
.H.E
. Aut
umn
Enr
ollm
ent R
epor
ts.,
Not
e: U
ndet
erm
ined
non
resi
dent
s or
e as
sum
ed to
be
out o
f sta
te n
ot fo
reig
n st
uden
ts.
82.6
%15
.6%
1.8%
68.2
24.7
7.1
95.2
-3.
81.
0.
9.2
20.5
.3
/789
.89.
3.9
81.8
15.3
2.9
93.8
2,2
4.0
93.7
5.7
.6
98.4
1.2
.4
84.8
12.9
\2.
3
34.7
61.3
4.0
67.3
30.9
'
1 8
67.8
%29
.3%
/9%
TABLE 12
Utah System of Higher Education
Utah Counties ProWding Greatest Resident Enrollment Percentage,
By Institution, AutuMn Headcount° , 1974-75
A. Universities
University of Utah1. Salt Lake '
2. Davis3. Weber4. Utah5. Taaele6. BOX Elder7. All Others
Total
72.7%6.82.52.4
.9
.8
13.9
Utah State University1. Cache 43.7%2. Salt Lake 17.6
3. Davis 7.5
4. Box Elder 7.25. Weber 6.66. Utah 4.87. All Others 12.6
Brigham Young Univ.'1. Utah 54.2%2. Salt Lake 17.8
3. Davis 6.1
4. Weber 2.65. Box Elder 1.5
6. Washington 1.1
7. All Others 16.7
100.0% Total 100.0% Total 100.0%
B. Four-Year Colleges
Weber State College Southern Utah State College 'Westminster
1. Weber 63.5% 1. Iran 44.8% 1. Salt Lake 87.1%
2. Davis . 23.0 2, Salt Lake J. 2. Davit 6.1
3. Box Elder 4.2
.10.53. Washington 7.6 3. Weli)e)- ,, 1.4
4. Salt Lake 3.9' 4. Utah 6.7 4. Box Elder 1.1
5. Marcia n 1.2 5. Sevier 4.8 5. Utah 1.1
6. Cache 1.6 6. Garfield 4.0 6. Toaele,Wasatch.5'
7. All Others 3.2 7. All Others 21.6 7. All Others 2.2
Total 100.0% Total 100.0% Total 100.0%
C. Two-Year Colleges
Snow College Dixie College College of Eastern Utah
1. Sanpete 33.8% 1..Washington 52.4% 1.Corban 77.5%
2. Utah 18:7 2. Salt Lake 17.3 2. Emery 8.7
3. Salt Lake 17.1 3. Utah 11.7 3. Salt Lake' 3.9
4. Davis 3.9 4. Davis 2.6 4. Grand 2.0
5. Sevier ?8 5. Tooele 1.9 5. Duchesne 1.9
6. Taaele 3.0 6. Weber 1.9 6. Sari Juan 1.4
7. Al! Others 19.7 7 All Others 12.2 7. All Others 4.6
Total 100.0% Total 100.0%< Total 100.0%
D. Vocational-Technical Colleges
Utah Technical College-ProvoUtah Technical College
Salt Lake
1. Utah 82.2% 1. Solt Lake 85.6%
2. Millard 2.7 2. Davis 6.5
3. Juab 1.6 3. Taaele 2.8
4. Wasatch 1.3 4. Utah 1.3
5. Sanpete 1.3 5. Weber .8
6. buchesne 1.0 6. Cache 5
7. All Others 9.9 7. All Others 2.5
Total 100.0% Total 100.0%
°Extended Day.,
Nate; Undetermined residence of Utah students
is assumed to be tfae local county .
Source! USHE 1974 Autumn Enrollment Reports.
148129
b All Evening students are reported as residents
of Utah County
.` Same no. of students.
TABLE 13
Utah System of Higher Education
States and Foreign Countries Providing the Largest Number of Nonresident Students,by Institution, Autumn Headcount, 1974-75
Otace of Residence UU USU WSC SUSe Snow
I. Nonresident Students No. % No. % No. % Ne. % No. , %A. United States
1. California 659 19.81% 380 17.50% 57 17.43% 108 28.35% 29 36.71%2. Idaho 229 6.88 371 17.09 23 7.03 3 .79 4 5.06
3. Nevada 130 3.91 105 4.84 35 10.70 155 40.68 5 6.334. Illinois 250 7.51 137 6.31 14 4.28 4 1.05 2 2.53
5. New York 137 4.12 140 6.45 16 4.89 5 1.31 1 '' 1.27
6. Wyoming 94 2.83 83 3.82 36 11.01 3 .79 1 1.27
7. Colorado 121 3.64 47 2.16 21 6.42 8 2.10 2 2.53
8. New Jersey 112 3.37 63 2.90 9 2.75 8 .2.10 2 2.53
Q. Arizona 54 1.62 38 1.75 5 '1.53 26 6.82, 1 1.27
10. Ohio 95 2.86 72 3.32 7 2.14 5 1.31 1 1.27
11. Pennsylvania 93 2.80 63 2.90 8 2.45 2 .52 -12. New Mexico 67 S 2.01 41 1.89 4 1.22 8 2.10 1 1.27
13. All Other States° '1,286 .18.64 631 29.07 92 28.15 46 12.08 30 37.96'
Total-United States 3,327 100.00% 2,171 100.00% 327 100.00% 381 100,00% w 79 100.00%
R. Foreign1. Iran 87 22.19 170. 27.11P4 27 32.14% ,- -% -2. Taiwan 53 13.52 62 9.89 - - - -3. Thailand 11
1.2.81 61 9.73 8 9.52 - - -
4. Canada 18 4.59 44 7.02 3 3.57 - - -5. Japan 8 2.04 37 5.90 3 3.57 1 16.67 .1 12.50
6. India 34 8.67 21 3.35 1 1.19 - - -7. Hong Kong 28 7.14 22 3.51 1 1.19 - - 2 25.00
8. Venezuela 2 .51 30 4.78 , - - -9. Korea 15 3.83 13 2.07 - - 1 16.67 - -
10. Pakistan 5 1.28 10 1.59 6 7.14 - - - -11. Vietnam 10 2.55 10 1.59 - - - - -.-12. Mexico 2 .51 15 2.39 -. - 2 33.33 -13. An'Other Countries 119 30.36 132 21.07 35 41.68 2 33.33 5 62.50
total- For elan 392 100.00% 627 100.00% 54 100.00% 6 100.00%. $ 100.00%
Total Nonresidents 3,719 17.41% 2,798 31.78% 411 4.79% 387 20.84% I,7 10.27%
II. Utah Resident Students 17,645 82.59 6,007 68.22 8,163 95.21 1,473 79.19 760 89.73
Total Enrollment 21,364 100.00%. 8,805 100.00% 8,574 100.00% 1,860 100.00% 847 100.00%
*Including unknown nonresidents
Source: U.S.H.E. Autumn Erwallment Reports, 1974.
143130
iff
Dixie CEU UTC-P UTC-SL USHE
No, % P4P, No. % 14.;. ,N.
56 30.43% 2 14.29% 32 18.29% 2 2.90% 1,325 . 19.70%5 2.72 - . - 21 12.00 8 11.59 664 9.87
73 39.67 1 7.14 21 12.00 7 10.14 532 '7.912. 1.09 3 21.43 1 .57 ,- I - 413 6.142 1.09 - - - - 1 1.45 302 4.49- - - - 7 4.00 7 10.14' 231 3.437 3.80 - - 12 6.86 - - 218 3,04- - - - .- - - 194, 2.88
23 12.50 I 7.14 23 13.14 22 31.88 193. 2.87- - - 1.14 - - 182 2.71
1 .54 - - -- - - - 167 2.482 1:09 1 7.14 24 13.71 , .14 20.29 162 2.41
13 7.07 6 42.86 32 18.29 8 11.61 2,144 31.87
184 100,00% 14 100.00% 175 100.00% 69 100.00% 6,727 100.0011;
9 25.71% 13 52.00% 2 11.11% 9 ,39.13% ---317 26.03%- - - - - - - 115 -9.442 5.71 - - 2 11.11% - - 84 6.90
2 5.71 - - 3 16.6'7 1. 4.35 71 5.834 11.43 4 16.00 - - 2 8.70 60 4.93- - - - 1 5.56, - -. 57 4.682 5.71 1 4.00 .- - ,- 56 4.602 5.71 - - 3 16.67 - --r 37 3.04,I 2.86 - - - - - 30 2.462 5.71 1 4.00
) .- 5 21.74 29 2.38- - - - - . - - 20 1.64- - - , - - 19 1.56 k11 31.45 6 24.00 ' 7 38.88 6 26.08 323 26.51 r
35 100.00% 25 100:00% 18 100.00% 23 100.00% 1,218 100.00%
219 18.20% 39 6,23% 193 6.29% 92 1.63% 7,945 15.28%
984 81.80 587 93.77 2,876 93.71 5,552 98.37 44;047 84.72
1,203 100.00% ' 626 100.00% 3,069 100.00% 5,644 100.00% 51,992 100.00%
4
150
131
4.4
TA
BLE
14
,U
tah
Sys
tem
of,1
4igh
er E
duca
tion,
tA
Sum
mar
y of
'the
Mig
ratio
n of
Stu
dent
s in
the
Wes
terr
rSta
tes.
, 19
72-7
3"
N.1
Sto
tt, W
here
Stu
dent
s A
ttend
Col
lege
* 4 S
tate
of O
rigin
Gra
nd.1
Tot
al'
Ariz
ona
I
Cal
iforn
iaC
olor
ado
Idah
o°M
onta
naN
evad
a-N
ew-
Mex
ico
Ore
gori
Uta
hW
ash-
ingt
onW
roth
ng
°
'314
9'
492
83-
518
' 42
'
1105
.96
A45
288
-27
'108
38
136
896
261
4334
0112
1
160
1447
179
1217
125
0
106 16
:
.."98 17 -24
245
730 19
8- 5
'27
135 . 9
-,30 12
2
1;04fir
89
.
-30
11
'.-29
115 35
'56
'98
443
....
16
(44
615
4
38 172. ilr
11'
.. 32 158
31
,
111
28 335
78 4279
.
102- 26
o
122
f-2
1 99 27 .334
2
.47 18
206.
49 818
'
234 31 57
',12
08'
'136
30
86 41 77 170 4 34 25'
200
5124 96
628
60
1219
1251
1575
5352
3659 66
2
Ariz
ona'
...
Col
orad
o'.
Idah
o''
a4
C.P
Mon
tana
Nev
ada
g '
..6
New
Mex
ico
Ore
gon.
.'U
tah
Wyo
min
g-
Tot
al53
312
222
1495
Sou
rce:
Roc
ky M
ount
ain
AtR
.Mig
ratio
n S
tudy
.°I
:Sat
o fr
om C
alif
arni
a.an
d W
ashi
ngto
n w
ere
not a
vaila
ble.
,025
5'
-601
1093
487
776
400
°27
6963
722
668
. Col
orad
o da
ta' i
ton
ly p
revi
bus
year
out
-of-
sta
te -
high
sck
iol g
radu
ates
.
a4
VT
0-
r'sP
BLE
15
Uta
h S
yste
ms
" fklig
herE
duC
atio
n
Inte
ntio
ns o
f Uta
h's
h S
choo
l Gra
duat
es19
70-
75
ca c..1
s 1...4
.
C.)
1
t,,,D
.tti
.,,
toec
onda
gy E
duca
tion
'197
0,
1971
,19
7219
7319
7419
75
Num
ber
,%
Num
ber
r 11,7
79
1,78
i
1,09
4
Num
bs'.
,%
. Num
ber
Num
ber
%N
iimbe
r%
12,8
98'
1,57
8
1,06
6
69.1
0%
8.46
'5.
71
61.4
8% -
9.34
5.71
16,9
61 900
°
<11
5
57:0
2%
9.88
4.76
-10
,239
1,64
9
959
53.4
8%
8.61
5.01
.
/
9.98
2
1,56
8
869
52.5
1%
'8.2
5
4.57
-
,10,
545
..
1,57
1
8,55
53.7
5% .8.
01
4.36
''
Col
lege
Voc
atio
nal S
choo
l
Bus
ines
s an
d O
ther
Sch
ools
'
Sub
tota
l15
,542
83.2
714
,662
76.5
313
,776
71.6
612
,847
67.1
012
,419
65.3
3,
-
12,9
7166
.12
Oth
er-.
0.-
Wor
k..
Oth
er (
Mar
riage
, Mis
sion
,A
rmed
For
ces,
Und
ecid
ed,
etc.
)-
2,28
1
842
12.2
2
4.51 \
.
3,02
7
1,46
9
15.8
0
7.67
.
3,99
1,
1,45
7
:20f
176
i 7.5
8.
-3,
791
2,50
7 .',
19.8
0
1
13.1
0
4,04
5
' 2,5
45
21.2
8
13.3
9
4,17
8 a
2,46
8
21.3
0
12.5
8
Sub
tota
l3,
123
16.7
34,
496
23.4
7''''
5,44
828
.34
6a98
32.9
06,
590
14.6
766
.46
33.8
8
Tot
al N
umbe
r of
Hig
h S
choo
l Gra
duat
es18
,665
100.
00%
,19,
158,
100.
00%
19,2
2410
0.00
%19
,14,
5
.'
100.
00%
19,0
0910
0.00
%19
,617
100.
00%
' Sou
rce:
Spr
ing
Hig
h S
choo
l Int
entio
n S
urve
ys
11
TA
BLE
16
Uta
btS
yste
m o
f Hig
her
Edu
catio
nA
S-u
mm
ary
of th
e N
umbe
rs a
nd_t
exce
ntag
es o
f Uta
h H
igh
Sch
ool G
radu
ates
Pla
nnin
g to
Atte
nd a
Uta
h P
ubliy
Hig
her
Edu
catio
n In
stitu
tion,
196
8 th
roug
h 19
75,
.
-...
G.s
..I:
.
1. U
nive
rsity
of U
tah
Num
ber
Per
cent
6ge
of U
S.H
.E.
1968
1969
1970
1971
1972
1973
1974
,19
75
2,97
5.
29 7
4%3,
203
32.0
6%3,
491
.27%
3,40
833
.28%
2,90
631
.42%
2,89
231
.99%
2,81
232
.58%
'3,
036
-32
.33%
2. U
tah
Sta
te U
nive
rsity
Num
ber
.,
''P
erce
ntag
e'of
U.S
.H.-
E.
-
12,
1421
,41%
1,92
019
.21%
1,75
6 -
16.7
4 %
1`"
%1
/.87%
1,71
2,
18.5
1%i .
543
17.0
7%16
1.'0
318%
117
1.'9
688%
9
3: W
eber
Sta
te C
olle
geN
umbe
r,P
erce
ntag
e of
U.S
.H.E
..
1;94
819
.48%
1,93
019
.31%
2,11
420
.15%
1,82
617
.82%
.1,
447
15.6
4%1,
585
17.5
3%1,
463.
16.9
6%1,
498
15.9
4%,
4. S
outh
ern
Uta
h S
tcite
Col
lege
.
Num
ber
.P
erce
ntag
e of
U.S
.H.E
.59
75.
97%
545
5.45
%
. ,
538
5 13
%
,.
537
e5.
24%
414
4.48
%41
344
.57%
469
5.44
%52
05.
53%
5. S
now
Col
lege
Num
ber
Per
cent
age
of U
.S.H
.E47
54.
75%
371
3.71
%48
214
59%
499
4.87
%31
53.
41%
474
5.24
%.
42p
4.96
%46
14.
91%
6. D
ixie
Col
lege
Num
ber
Per
cent
oge
of U
.S.H
.50
.45.
04%
584
5.84
%60
45.
76%
458
4.47
%-
543
5.87
%42
14.
66%
440
5.10
%51
95.
52%
7. C
olle
ge o
f Eas
tern
Uta
hN
umbe
rP
erce
ntog
e of
U.S
.N.E
.,25
8.2
.58%
222
2.22
%21
.8'
2.27
%16
31.
59%
-177
1.91
%17
9'1.
98%
157
1.82
%16
21.
72 %
'
8. U
tah
Tec
hnic
al C
ol.,
Pro
voN
umbe
Per
cent
aS
.H.E
.37
53.
75%
434
4.3.
4%
1
463.
4.41
%62
06.
05%
673
7.28
%70
67.
81%
685
-7.
94%
726
7.73
%
9. U
tah
Tec
hnic
al C
ol.,
Sal
t Lak
eN
umbe
rP
erce
ntag
e of
U.S
.H.E
.'7
28.
7.28
%78
67.
86%
806
7.68
%90
38.
81%
1,06
211
.48%
827
9.15
%79
39_
19%
784
8.34
%
Num
ber
Pla
nnin
g U
.S.H
.E.
10,0
019
995
.10
,492
10,2
459,
249
9,04
08f
628
.9,3
95
Per
cent
oge
Pla
nnin
g U
.S.H
.E.
Tot
al N
o. H
igh
Sch
ool G
rads
.59
.17%
16,9
0256
.65%
17,6
4456
.21%
18,6
65ig
3.48
%19
,158
48.1
1%19
,224
47.2
2%19
,145
45,3
9%19
,009
47.8
9%19
,617
.
Sou
rce:
Hig
h S
choo
l Int
entio
ns S
urve
ys e
achy
sprin
g.I
TA
BLE
17
Uta
hSys
tem
of H
ighe
r E
duca
tion
Pub
lic a
nd P
rivat
e V
eter
an E
nrol
lmen
ts'a
nd G
radu
ates
1972
-73
Thr
ough
197
4-71
5, 1'-
1.-
1972
-73
197
-74
1974
-75
Inst
itutio
n
Num
ber
Vet
eran
sE
nrol
led 3,
468
Per
cent
age
of T
otal
Enr
ollm
ent
- 16.6
1%
Num
ber
Vet
eran
sG
radu
ated 42
0
Num
ber
1 P
erce
ntag
eV
eter
ans
Ort
otal
Enr
olle
d;
Enr
ollm
ent
k---
-I
1,95
01'
9.43
%
Num
ber
1V
eter
ans
Gra
duat
ed 516
Num
ber
Vet
eran
sE
nrol
led . 2,
050
Per
cent
age
of T
otal
Enr
ollm
ent
9.42
%
kum
ber
'' V
eter
ans
Gra
duat
ed
.50
8U
nive
rsity
of U
tah
Uta
h S
tate
Uni
vers
ity1.
376
15.7
329
7.1,
297
.'1
5.19
294
1,32
716
.58
330
Web
er S
tate
Col
lege
1,59
919
.64
204
1,92
2.23
.14
185
2,46
628
.76
-0
202
c....
.kt..
., I '
tea,
c*.
-....
C..1
1,...
.....
1QG
inA
O'
AG
111
12 /I
Q1G
119
7 /
11
1+ CT
Ior
-:=
Sno
w C
afle
be32
4.85
.6
Dix
ie C
olle
ge--
66
.' 5
85.
91,_
11.5
5
16.1
9
15 8. C
olle
ge o
f Eas
tern
Uta
h
litah
DT
echn
ical
Col
lege
/Pro
va_.
..
437
86
Uta
h T
echn
ical
Col
lege
/Sal
t Lak
eT
1,04
6'
24.1
01'
58
1,23
9T
otal
Pub
lic--
r I ,
8,26
7
'
IS
16.9
2%
'B
righa
m Y
ou'rg
Uni
vers
ity1,
676
6.82
381
Wes
tmin
ster
qol
lege
I80
10.4
221
Tot
al P
rivat
e.1
'1,
756
10,0
23
6.93
%
13.5
1%
402
1,64
1,
7T
otal
= A
llSch
ools
'j:
.r-
-1
354.
61/-
827
.03
7
706.
2)/
1166
5.2
4
7211
377
626
14.0
g
367'
,13
.29
7557
219
:16
48
'70
514
.89
291
981
'17.
499
6,54
9 ''
13.3
3%1,
422
8,24
715
.9%
1,23
8
1,69
36.
46''4
261s
.1,
521
6.5
365
8711
3:22
1494
10.0
725
1,78
0\
6'.?
%'
440
1,61
55.
88%
..39
0
8,32
9,\
10.4
3%1,
862
9,86
2.
12.4
1%'1
,628
Aut
urrin
Qua
rter
Ext
ende
d D
ay, H
ead
Cou
nt E
nrol
lmen
t.
b N
umbe
r of
vet
eran
gra
duat
e st
uden
ts e
nrol
led
sprin
g qu
arte
r, 1
975.
Num
ber
vete
rans
'gra
clu'
ated
not
talli
ed o
t of
toll
nurn
bei o
f gra
duat
es.
v.S
ourc
es: U
tah
S)
ofS
tem
Hig
her
Edu
catio
n A
nnua
l Enr
ollm
ent A
naly
sis,
197
2-73
and
197
3-74
; Aut
umn
Enr
olls
4nt R
epor
t, 19
7475
.
Inst
itutio
.nal
part
s of
Vet
eran
Stu
dent
s:19
72-7
3 th
rbug
h 19
74-7
5.' -
t.
TABLE 18
Utah System of Higher Education
Capital Facilities Appropriations and Bonded Revenues1969-70 Through 1975-76 Actual, 1976-77,Recommended
1969-70 1970-71 1971-72 1972-73\
Institution% of
Actual USHE
% ofActual USHE Actual
ofUSHE Actual USHE
% of
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6),, (7) (8)
U of U $1,378,000 27.3 $424,642 10.4 0 .0 $918,000 20.9
0.S.U. 976,500 19.4 14127,000 27.7 350,000 10.5 101,000 2.3
W.S.C. 546,000 10.8 A79,000 11.8 0 0 2,279,000 51'.8
S.U.S.C. 4564,000 11.2 243,200 5.0 0 0 790,000 18.0
Snow 962,200 19.1 148,000 3.6 16,000 .5 80,000 1.,Dixie 293,000 5.8 200,000 4.9 o 134,000 3.0
C.E.U. 200,000 4.0 220,000 5.4 '0 28,000- .6
UTC-P 17,000 .3 18,000q6
.5 0 0 0 0
UTCSIC 108,900 2.2 1,211,000 29.7 3,1.12,210 89.5 69,000 1.6
State Building Board6 .
.41U.S.H.E. Total 5,045,600 100.0 4,070,842 100.0 3,478,210 100.0 4,399,000 100.0
Vat* Total 6,277,824 - 5,127,473 - 3,478,210 6,613,200
USHE/ As a % of.State Total 80.4% 79.4% 100.0 %,. 66.5%
?Available for use of USHE Institution'fcr OSHA ond handicapped renovationsb Includes both appropriations ond bonded Vvenuo
4OURCE: Appropriations Acts 1969197 -
State Building ond Exponsicin ProgramChopter 195lows of,Utah .1975.4
136 .
1973-74 1974-75 1975-76b TOTAL 1976-77
Actual USN
% ofActual USHE
% ofActual USHE
1969-70Thru % of
1975-76 USHE
Board % ofRecommind. USHE
(9) (10) (11) (12) (13) (14)' (15) (16) (17) (18)
52,903,000 17.1 52,798,000 27.2 535,135,000 54.2 $43,556,642 39,9 $5,207,000 41.3
3,235,000 19:0 2,779,000 27.1 4;449,000 6.9 13,012,500 11.9 1 2,138,000 17.0
852,000 . 5.0 . 2,434,000 23.6 4,077,000 6.3 / 0,667,000 9.8 1,670,000 13.3.
1,1-16,000 6.6 738,000 7.2 1,082,000 1.7 4,533,200 4,2 693,000 5,4
221,000 1,3 252,000 2.4 3,110,000 4.7 4,789;200 4.3 436,000 3.4
299,000 1.8 946,000 9.2 1,63,000 2.5 3,505,000 3.2 1;433,450 11.4
173,000 1.0 256,000, 2.5 1, , 25,000 2.7 2,602,000 12.4 413,000 3.3
8,084,000 47.5 54,000 8,000,000 1°2.3 16,173,000 14.8 87,000 .7
121,000 .7 35,000 .3 4,255,000 6.6 8,912,110 8.2 136,000 1.1
.1,374,000 2.1 1,374,000 1.3 385,000 3,1ZEItim a ted) (Estimated
17 0134 000 100.0 10,292,000 100.0 6411835,000 100.0 109,14,652 100.0 12,598,450 100.0
21,292,000 4 12,000,000 -= 16T50,000 131,538,707
79.9% 85.8% 84.4% 83.0%
13
1 3 7, --
It
TABLE 19
Utah System of Higher Education
Recommendati for Capital Facilities ApOopriation 1976-77(As Approved y the State Board of Regents, Oct. 29, 1975)
Priority institution
fi
\
Description Amount
.
CumulativeTotal
1
2
3
4
CEU Coreer Bldg. EquipmentBuilding Boord life, Heolth and Safety
Code Complionce atU of U ond USU
Building Boord Modification for HandicoppedBuilding Boord Roof Repair
$ 343,000
750,000250,000135,000
343;000
1,093,000
1,343,0001,478,000
5 Board of Regent,} Commissioner's Office
6 ,UTC/P A. R. & I. 87,000 1,565,0007 Dixie A. R. & I. 15,000 1,580,0008 WSC land PurChase 93,000 1,673,0009 Snow President's Home 52,000 1,725,000
10 UTC/S1 President's Home 55,000 1,780,00011 Dixie President's Home 83,450 1,863,45012 U of U A/C Bennion Holl 90,000 1,953,45013 USU A'nimol Science Remodel 347,Q00 2,300,45014 Snow Miscelloneous 384,000 2,684,45015 USU Relocote Militory for Fine Arts Bldg. 150,000 2,834,45016 U of U Util. fees for Low Exponsion 849,000 3,683,45017 U of U H.T.W. Exponsion Tank 500,000 4,183,45018 WSC Tech. Bldg. Remodel 598,000 4,781,45019 USU Woter Lob. Improvements 900,000 5,681,450
' 20 U of U low School Addition 2,757,000 '8,438,45021 SUSC 4Utilities 410,000 8,848,45022 Dixie Utilities 1,335,000 10,183,450
23 USU- ,Emergency Generator 65,000 10,248,450
24 WSC .Centrol Compus Development t 620,000 10,868,45025 U of U 7200-Volt line 311;000 11,179,450
26 WSC Elec. Qist. Improvements ,326,000 11,505,450
27 U of U Park Bldg. Rem'odel 300,000 11,805,450
29
SUSC Arts an0 CraftsWSC Micro Cable
153,00033,000
11,958,450
11,991,45030 USU Hozord removal ond Compels Development 326,000 12,317,450
31 SUSC Athletics 130,000 12,447,450
32 CEU Track 70,000 12,517,450
33 UTC/S1 'Tennis Courts 81,000 12,598,450
15:7,138
TA
BLE
10
'Uta
h S
yste
m o
f Hig
her
Edu
catip
nA
Sum
mar
y of
Gro
ss A
cade
mic
Squ
are
Fee
t°, F
.T.E
. Stu
dent
s b
and
the
Gro
ss A
cade
mic
Squ
are
Fee
t Per
F.T
.E. S
tude
nt,
1972
-73
Thr
ough
197
4-75
-
1972
-73
Act
ual.
1973
-74
Act
ual
-19
74-7
5A
ctua
l
Num
ber
Aca
dem
icS
pace
Per
Num
ber
Aca
dem
icS
pace
Per
Num
ber
Aca
dem
icS
pace
Per
Inst
itutio
nof
Squ
are
Yea
rF
.T.E
.of
Squ
are
Yea
r ,
F.T
.E.
of S
quar
eY
ear
F.T
.E.
Fee
tF
.T.E
.S
tude
ntF
eet
F.T
.E.
Stu
dent
Fee
tF
.T.E
.S
tude
nt
Uni
vers
ity o
f Uta
h.
3,36
2,55
218
,471
182
4
3,35
0,93
3>18
,148
185
3,71
1,02
918
,469
201
Uta
h S
tate
Uni
vers
ity2,
110,
195
8,16
825
82,
097,
853
7/,7
1126
52,
111,
588
8,17
025
8
Web
er S
tate
Col
lege
843,
700
6,11
313
883
6,93
56,
262
134
1,01
7,43
26,
423
158
Sou
ther
n U
tah
Sta
te C
olle
ge'
325,
501
1,63
819
936
7,66
74
1,47
724
932
9,80
01,
669
198
Sno
w C
olle
ge-
160,
095
'"
614
261
194,
555
f70
827
519
6,23
176
825
6
Dix
ie C
olle
ge.
Col
lege
of E
aste
rn U
tah
205,
201
157,
604
971
459
K21
1
343
208,
347
163,
617
968
'45
321
5,21
3,34
636
116
9,44
6
948
469
225
361
Uta
h T
echn
ical
Col
lege
- P
rovo
191,
373
1,87
710
2.
213,
227
1,95
1'
109
216,
484
2,29
794
Uta
h T
echn
ical
Col
lege
- S
alt t
ake
424,
502
2,66
315
945
5,80
2, 2
,888
158
543,
104
3,26
416
6
Uta
h S
yste
m o
f Nig
her.
Edu
catio
n-T
otal
7,78
0,72
340
,974
190
7,89
0,93
640
,766
194
8,50
1,46
042
,477
200
Incl
udes
Res
earc
h S
pace
bA
cade
mic
Yea
r F
.T.E
.
SO
UR
CE
: Uta
h S
tate
Bui
ldin
g B
oard
TABLE 21
Utah System of Higher Educalibir
Utilization°of Class Rooms, by Room and Station;Autmmn Quarter, 1969 Through 1974
tt. Institution 1969 1970 1971 1972 1973 1\974
University of UtahNumber
% Utilization
2Room Utilization - Classrooms
(1) (2) , (3) (4) (5) (6),
197 225 .. 228 220 210 209
53.0% 53.9% 52.2% 53.6% 56.6% 55.7%
Utah State UniversityNumber 106 118 195 102 . 97 ,.. 9
% Utilization 62.8% 56.7% 59.7% 55.8% 61,4% 59.44.
INCiber ate CollegeNum er% Utilization
78 74 75 107 104 HO
57.6% 61.4% 65.2% 52.9%
Southcirnthah Stat. CollegeNumber 35 35 34 32
% Utilizotion 46.5% 51.5% 50.0% 56.4%-Snow College
Number .19 19 18 17
%Utilization 45.0% 45.6% 47.3% 48'.4%
Dixie CollegeNumber 19 19 19 19
% Utilization 43.9% 51.2% 54,7% 47,5%
College of Eastern UtahNumber 1 24' 25 24 20
% Utilization 30.2% 29.9% 27.1% 33.2% ,
Utah Technical Collo ProverNumber 34 32 26 39
% Util i n 32,1 % 40.8% 48.3% 49.0%
tall Technical College-SalrlakeNumber ' ° 51 42 46 61
% Utilization 42.4% 38.0% 45.9% 43.8%
Utah System of Higher Education-Number 563 5119 575 617
°8 a.m. to 5 p.m. weekly
SOURCE:.Utah State Building Board
15140
33 30
52.1% 53.8% .
20 17
37.3% 42.1%
49.9% 40,0°/O\
,r
18 18
48,3% 42.0 %'
18 17
28.4% 31.0%
36 48
-41.5% 39.2%
47 48
55,6% 56.3%
583 592
Station Utilization - clas srooms
1969 1970 1971 1972 1973 1974
(7) (8) (9) (10) (11) (12)
11,707 12,837 14,032 13,632 12,851 12,943
33.9% 33.8% 32.9% 33.2% 34.2% 34.3%
6,271 '6,645 6,375 .6;111 5,987 5,880
34.9% 32.3% 33.9% 34.2% 3Z.370' 36.6% .
4,022
41.8°/0
1,332
31.9%
3,878
39.9%
1,315
38.2%
4,001
38.1%
1,284
39.9%
5,057
28.8%
1,244
34.9%
4,957
31.2%
1,264
30.2%
5,113 428.6%
1,197
34.2%
'682 658 606 572 809 690'
31.9% 34.1 %, 34.4% 30.5% 24.0% 41.0%
937 949 949 949 935 867
"30.7% 31.0% 28.4% 24.7% 23.0% 23.8%
1,400 1,379 1,344 .1,162 986 956
12.6% 13.4% .11.3% 10.8% 9.9% 10.8%,
985 915 840 1,148 1,080 1,481
23.0% 30.5% 31.8% 32.0% 30.6% 28.2%
1,396 1,063 1,175 1,988 1,617 1,761
32.1% 29.3% 39.3% 30.3% .36.2% 32.9i
28,132 . 29,639 30,606 31,863 30,416 30,888
160141
4%,
TABLE 22
Utah System of Higher EclUC'dflon
Utilization of Teaching Labs by om and Station,Autumn Quarter, 1969 T rough 1974
Room Utilisation - Teaching LabsInstitution 1969
(I).
104
3276%
1970 1971 1972 1973 1974
University of UtahNumber% Utikation
(2) .
143
30.8%
(3)
126
42.3%
(4)
117
29.3%
(5)v
113
33.4%
(6)
100
35.7%
Utah State University 44Number 85 100 108 105 101 91% Utilization 31.3% 29.3% 33.4% 4. 32.7% 31,8% 32.6%
Weber State CollegeNumber 75 87 82 " 99 68 68% Utilization 36.7% 45.3% 411%:' 39`.5%' 37.7% 32.5%
Southern Utah State College,Number 32 31 31 31 32 26% Utilization 35.4 %, 33.8% 36.4% 41.4% . 35.5% 47.7%
Snow CollegeNumber 17/9. 17 19 17 19 22% Utilization 31.9% 35.6% 30.8% 36.7% 24.6% 30.9%
Dixie-CollegeNumber . 21 18 19 19 19 20
-:',';'°/,:, Utilization 33.3% 40.8% 40.6% 44:9% 44.0% 36.6%
College of Eastern Utah .Number 19 ,- 17' 19 21 24'''''`,. 24% Utilization . 29.4% 36.2% 32.0% 29.8% 27.2% 470
.
Utah Technical College - Provo'.Number - 34 32 44 43 48 53% Utilization 44,2% 45.5% 48.4% 48.3% 39,4% 47.7%
Utah Technical College7-Salt Lake `Number 48
,
48 42 61 ' 57 60% Utilization 51.7% 53.8% 62.9% 45.4% 51.3% 51 7%
Utah System of Educa oit.1
Number 35_ 493 490 513 481 464
08 a.m. to 5 p.m. weekly -e,
SOURCE: Utah State Building Fund
6 i142
Station Utilization - Teaching Labs
1969 ' 1970 1971 1972 1973 4(7)
2,895
411)
4,778
(9) (10)
3,612 3,371--. 3,394
(12)
7"962
25.1% 17.8% 26.1 %i 45.3% 26.86/ 27.2%
2,C93 2,354 2,770 2,814
26.9% . 25.8% a6.8% 261%
1,867 2,093 2,087 2,390
27.6% 34.0% 31.8% 26.9% 27.6% 21.3%
600 593 593 7 585 605 522
28.4% 30.0% 30.8% 36.6% 28.6% 39.1%
2,726 2,449
'27.7% 25.1%
1,8651'' 1,759
..7
421 421 509 429 431 528
18.5% 21.1% 16.2% 17.6% 16.8% 18.9%
611 515 540 540 540 593
20.8% ' 28.3% 23.6% 29.9% 27.4% 25:3%
.i
/ 394 t364 397 410 554 554
24.5% 34.0% 27.6% 24.3% 19.0% 22.7%
985 915 914 854 1,013 1,186
32.4% 38.5% 46.2 %, 42.2% 38.5% 42.5%
1,136 1,090 942 1,523 1,436 , 1,555
41.9% 48.0% 60.8% 40.2% 43.5% 42.1%
11,002 13,123 12,359 12,916 12,564 12,101
162
143
Profiles of Member Institutions
Utah System institutions offer abroad curriculum to accommodatemost post-secondary needs.
163
DefinedRole
CollegesSchools and
Divisions
Calendar
Admission
UNIVERSITY OF UTAH (1850) Salt Lake CityPresident: David P. GardnerAdministrative Offices: John R. Park Building,
Salt Lake City, Utah 84112 .
The University of Utah was chartered in 1850 as the University ofDeseret and rec irtered in 1894 under the present name. First in-struction was offer d in 1850 and the first baccalaur4te degree wasawarded in 1884. he University, with a present enrollment of17,378 undergraduat students and 4,373 graduate students, offersdegree programs through 12 colleges, a Graduate School and threegraduate professional schools. Sponsored research and training pro-grams were funded to a total of $42 million in 1974-75, one of thehighest figures in the nation. An additional $3 million was grantedthe University Research Institute. The 1.500 acre campus contains149 permanent buildings (over half of therrrbuilt in the past decade)and a research park.
Utah's oldest, established in 1850, the Uni rsity of Utah, serves asa major .state university, with graduate sch is in Foducation and.'Social Work, colleges of Business, Enginee Fine Arts, Health, 'Humanities, Law, Medicine, the State College f Mines and MineralIndustries. Nursing, Pharmacy, the Graduate School, and a divisionof Continuing Education. The University is a primary center ofuniversity research and of graduate and professional education in thecolleges and degree programs now authorized.
Business, Engicieering, Faille Arts, Health, Humanities, Law, Medi-cine, Mines and Mineral' Industries, Nursing, Pharmacy, Social andBehavioral Science; Graduate School; Graduate,School of Architec-ture, Graduate School of 'Education, Graduate School of SocialWork; Division of Continuing Education; -Museums' of Fine Arts,
Natural History and Naval History.
Four quarter ,system. Freshmen admitted September, January,March and June. Degrees conferred in June.
Freshmen applications may be submitted after completion of thesixth semester of high school. ACT is required for all entering fresh-.
men. Other applications ust be submitted by published deadlineswhich are at least 30 days prior to registration date.
1Q4145
sr Jr' au
Fees dsideni: Full-tirne tuition $525 per academic year. Nonresident:"151,335, per academic year, For Colleges of Law, and- Medicine seecurrent General Catalog. On-campus goon' and hoard range fromapproximately $1,275 for doertile room to $1,475 for single room, .
per nine-month school year. This includes ropin, seven-day weal-service and telepho-fic.
Student Some 3800 scholarships anegrants, of various kinds are awarded,toFinancial
Aid untVergraduates. The University partiyipates.in National QirectSttident ,Loans,. 5ppplemental Educational' Opportunity- 1Grants "kid .
College Work Study programs. All applications4r aid based onmerit only rnukbereceived by F wary 1 to-Be Considered fox thefollowing-autumn qUarter p 'cations for aid based on rieed mustbe received at least 30-'clayspriorlo the beginning of the barter forwhich aid is requested. A-Parents Confidential Statem trs requiredfrom parents of a student dependent. Married an ndependent stu-dents file a student financial statement.
Spe'cial Early admission and concurrent registration in, university courses forAcademic ,qualified high school students; honors program with interdepartmen-Programs
tal course and special seminars; Bachelor, of University studies andther self-designed interdisciplinary degree programs; National Stu-ent Exchange program allowing sophomores and juniors to studyt another university campus in the U. .1 various study abroad, pro-rams, summer or acadeinic year, e.g. European Study Tour in Lon-on and Dteblin, Travel Study in Ki I, Gernilany, Summer Field
Project in Israel, etc. . '
Student UniversitY'residencehnlls hquse 1,317 single students; married stu-dent housing has 941 apartments (one to three bedrooms), and theMedical Towers have 151 apartments for studenwin medicine ,a.nd-allied fields. All housing' areas have adequate parking facilities for.the occupants.' The fraternity and sorority system provides accom-modations for members, of thei'i' respective hbuses. There. ate 12fraternities and 9 sororities presently active.
' R.O.T.C: Air Force optional for two years; Army, Navy, optional fbr two or ,
r<lipfour years.
165,
: a
: ' . a .
,11
.
/
U
4yr , II f. '
ir
0
.
ea
.17
UTAH STATE UNIVERSITY (1888) Logan\President: Glen If. Taggart
Administrative Offices:,Old"Main, Logan, Utah 84322
Chartered as rcgrirtiltural Coll ge Of Utah 1888; first instruction1890.; first baccalaureate 1,894 Name changed to Utah State Agri-cultural College in .1929, to wsent official. name, Utah State Uni-versity of Agriculture and plied Science, 1957.
Defiled Utah State University is Utah's land-grant university under stateRole legislation, 'Congressional enactments of 1862, 1'867 and subsequent
years. Utah State University is one of two major universitiesserving4the State System.of Higher Education: It includes a Division of Ex-tension and Continuing Education and the 'Utah. Agricultural Ex-
'. petiment Station under supporting federal legislation, colleges of,4) AgriCulture, Business Education, Engineering; Family Life, Human-
ities- Arts - Social Sciences, Natural Resource,. and Science, a Schoolof Graduate StudieS, a Summer School, a Division of Internationaltudies and PrOgtams. Progtams of Undetgraduate, masfer's' and
doctoral ilistruction and research in these colleges as authorized re-ceive emphasis, together with programs related to agriculture,'Iand,'water, forestry, food sciences:the development'and maintenance Cifnatural resources. Utah State University is a primary center of uni-versity research, of graduate and professionol education, in the,fieldsauthorized and assigned to it.
Calendar Quarter system. Regular session late September. to early June.Freshmen adrriitted 'beginning each quarter. Degrees conferred inJune. Summer session: eight weeks, mid-June to mid:August.,
A
Admiision Applications should be Submitted at least one month before registra-tion.
Fees' Resident .Full-time tuition and fees $1,65.50 per quarter. Non-resident: Full-time, tuition and fees average $392.50 per quarter.On-campus roojn and board averages $1:125 for doiible room to$1,200 for single room per school year. Books and supplies about$175. Married housing available..
Varied scholarships along with theNational Defense Student Loan,Educational Opportunity Grant, Basic portunity Grant, an4 Stu-dent Wo,rk Study-programs are offered. aximum freshrn
StudentFinancial
Aid
167148
SpecialAcademicPrograms
c
$2,450. Applications for scholarship and all other aid due February1. Parents Confidential Statement form is required for financial aid,bin not for scholarships.
International Programs has sponsored several off -campus teachingprograms. In coo ration with the Bolivian contract credit courseshave been provided by USU staff members in selected subject matterareas. Courses for credit toward a Master's degree have also beenstarted in Iran. This kirid"Of outreach has many benefits to the Uni-versity'andprovides professors an opportunity to broaden their scopeof -knowledge and to enrich their classroom offerings.
Special language programs have been ,started on campils as a result_of activities -and coordination of the East-West Institute and thePeace "Center programs. Foreign study tour programs to foreign-lands are based on student interest. The quarter in Mexico to studyin Spanish and the Art Tour to Mexico are annual programs thatattract a great deal of interest.'
The Intensive English Language Institute is supported in large partby students contacted by International Programs.
/Conference and Institute DivisiOn provides arrangements for numer-ous meetings, conferences, classes, short courses, workshops and other:academic programs for credit and non-credit, serving thousands ofpersons each year.
Continuing Education Centers in the Uintah Basin and in South-
' .eastern Utah provide resident. instructional programs leading to de-g-rees and teacher certification for residents of those areas. A residentinstructional staff is supplementecLby a teaching staff brought to theareas from the Logan campus.
Degree For all bachelor's" degrees, minimum 186 quarter units; 48 unitsRequirements approved general education courses, 24 introductory (including 6
units of communication skills classes) and 24 advanced, with optionto ..propose one's own unique program; 60 upper division uhits; aprofessional component of 122 units which includes the major, cer-tification reqUirements, and all ancillary course work', 2.0 averageon 4.0 scale; minimum residence 45 units including, 15 of last 60.( See catalog for specific degree requirements) .
Stu ern Residence halls house 24% of undergraduate men and 41% .ofLife undergraduate women. Apartnfents for married student Some
10% of both men and wocfnen join 7 fraternities and 3 sororities;
1681,49 a.
r
37% of fraternity members and 42,% of sorority members live inorganizational housing. Cars permitted. University sponsors lyceumand concert series, drama and music prograMs. Logan (population22,000-) is 81 miles north of Salt Lake City.
R.O.T.C. Army, Air Force; optional 2 or 4 years.
DefinedRole
WEBER STATE COLLEGE (1889) OgdenPresident : Joseph L. BishopAdministrative Offices: OgdenUtah 84408
Established as Weber Stake Academy by the Church of Jesus Christof Latter-day Saints 1889, first instruction at college level 1916;became junior college 1923,, slate, institution 1933; 4 *year college1963; first baccalaureate 1964: Name changed to Weber Academy1908, Weber. Normal College' 1918; Weber College 1923, presentname 1963.
Weber State College serves the System as a large four-year collegenear the center of state population. It offers undergraduate liberaleducation in the arts and sciences, authorized professional work ineducation, business, economics, allied health. and technolOgy fortrade-technical, education, plus an active continuing education pro-gram. The technical education prograrti provides varieties of tech-nical alit para-professidn:al work leading to baccalaureate degrees.Weber State College serves as a valuable source of professional andof graduate students for transfer to ihe.System's universities in Loganand Salt Lake City. Weber State College is also a significant re-ceiving institution, having the capacity to accept undergraduatetransfer students from the System's two technical colleges locatednearby on the Wasatch Front, as well as from the junior colleges.
Calendar Quarter system. Regular session late September to early June.Freshmen admitted beginning each quarter. Degrees conferred inJune.. Summer ,quarter of 8 weeks, 'mid-June to mid-August.
Admission Applications should be submitted after' 6th semester' of high school,at least 30 days before rdgistration.
Fees Resident: Full-time tuition and fees $155 per quarter. Non:resident$317 per quartier.
1 6 3150
'StudentFinancial
Aid
A variety of scholarships, National Defense Student Loan, Educa-tional Opportunity Grant and Student .Work Study programs areofTered with about 15('( of freshmen mild Er( of all students re-ceiv,ing aid. Maximum freshman aid is $2,000. Deadline for scholar-ship application is February 1. Deadline for other financial aid
'.application is August. The Parents' Confidential StaterPent is re-quired.
Degree For bachelor of arts, or bachelor of science degrees:- .183 quarterRequirements n i ts 40 units general 'ed'ucation-;:60 Upper division units; 40-60
units in major, 20 in minor, 2.0- average 4Ori 4.0 scale minimuni re-quirement,. resident; 45 units, including 1 quarter' of senior year. ryFor teacher education.: 2.25 average. Associate degrees. and 'cer-tificates awarded for special programs,
Student College residence hallihouse 144 women students in apartment type,Life facilities and 546 men and women in board and room facilities. No
facilities ott canipus for' married students. S6ime 8% of men and9c/e 14 women join 7 fraternities and sororities. Cars permitted.College sponsors'com:ocation series, art shows, diAma, operas, musi-cal programs and many other community4programs. MetropolitanOgden pop.,.,100,000 ) is 35 miles north of Salt Lake City.
R.O.T.C. .1rrilj', optional 2 or 4 years.-,'
Collections College collections include vertebrate animals from intermountainregion, .prese.rved amphibians and reptiles, study skins of birds andmammals, and 'synoptic survey of insects. College herbarium housesplants of Weber County, flora of Utah and adjacent states, some500 sheets of South Pacific plants and 'plants from eastern U.S.;geological collcrtions of minerals, ores, rocks and fossils of over 150speci s. A special collection in the college library houses the Howellrare.0I oks collection, Morrell porcelain collection, the Becraft FarEastern t:ollection, the Paul Branson art collectibn and others.
'SOUTHERN -UTAH STATE COLLEGF, (1897) Cedar CityPresident: Rovden C. BraithwaiteAdministrative Offices: Cedar City, Utah 84720
c's
Established a.k Branch Normal gthool of University, pf Utah and&Jfirst instruction 1897; transferred to Utah State Agricultural College
7 0151
wo
DefinedRole
and name changed to Brapch Agricultural College of Utah 1913;. .,.
first baccalaureate awarded, 1950; name changed to College of ,
Southern Utah 1953; became independent institution 1965; presentname adopted' 1969.
Southern Utah State College' provides an educatiOnal opportunitywithin the Utah System of Higher Education for those whose needsare best serked in a small- to medium-size four-year college with itsresidential life and sense of community. Time College is authorizedto offer codrses leading to the'baccalaureat degree in the arts and
.sciences, in teacher education, liusiness,and techtiOIo . The College4ioffers approved pfe-professional-puris, c,-ertiBe rograiris-"-Wiiti,rcational and tedialeal-subleets, 1.Ind_agritititural subjects. approvedby the Board. Opportunities exist in continuing-education, also incommtinit..}Lservi,and -,deVelopment commensurate- with its ap-proved curriculum and 'resources.
Calendar Quarter system. Regular session late September, t6 early June,.'Freshmen admitted Sepcerril2er, January, March. Degrees conferred
. ,in June. Summer'sessiOn: tw 4 week terms, early June to earlyAugust.
_Admission. $10 application fee: Applications should be submitted at Ieast.6weeks .before registration.
Fees Resident: Full-time tuition and fees, $143 per quarter. NOnresident:$293 per quarter. On-campus room and hoard per year $990. ($25application).
StudentFinancial
Aid
All scholarship applications must be received prior to February 1 tobe considered for awards the next,autumn. The college participatesin the National Direct Student LoanS, Supplemental EducationalOpportunity Grant and the,, ,,College Work Study programs. Appli-cations for these programs should be submitted by pine 1. Almost
''vehalf of all undergradunfes rece some aid annually. The AmericanCollege Testing .( Nei') Fami y Financial Statement is required.
Degree For degrees' (83 quarter units; 56 units general education ;,,,40765.Requirements units in major, 20 30 in minor. -See catalog for other details.
,
Student 34e/6 of students live in residence halls. There are campu4art-Life ants for married couples. About 8% of men join 3 fraternities
171152 O
DefinedRole
r5
housing 75(,7 of members. Cars permitted. Collegesponsors Annual'Utah Shakespearean Festival. Drama club .i.md art shows are jointlysponsored by community, and school. Cedar City, (pop. 10,000)sponsors programs by Ballet West and Utah Symphony. College is265 miles south of Salt Lake City!
SNOW COLLEGE (1888) EphraimPresident : J. Marvin HigbeeAdministrative Offices: Ephraim, Utah 84627
Established as Sanpete Stake Academy by the Gi iureh of Jesus Christof Latter-day_ SaintS". Name changed to Snow Academy .1900.Junior C011ege instruction first offered 1923. In 1933, came undercontrol of State Department of Public Instruction. Became. branchof Utah State University of Agriculture and Applied Science, 1951.Became part of Utah State System of Higher Education under con-trol of Utah State Board of Higher Education, 1969.
Snow College affords opportunities for students at a two-year com-bined residential and day-student college. With Dixie College andthe College of Eastern Utah, the system's two-year colleges are de-signed to provide pre-matriculation, general, vocational, as well astransfer options. Snow provides unusual opportunities for studentswho are especially interested in residential experience in,a two-gearcollege. The system's two-year colleges are intended to'serve as viableproductive, two-year colleges, providing general educational,. voca-tional opportunities and transfer options to the four-year colleges and
universities.
Calendar Quarter system. Regular, session late September to early June.Freshmen may enter any quarter. Associate degrees conferred in
`June,.
tlkdmission Open door. No appl cation. fee required. Applications received upto the day of registra on. American College Test recommended.
Fees Resident : Full-time tuition and fees,. $124.50 per quarter. Non-
Resident : Full-time tuition and 'fees, $256.50 per quarter. Mini-
mum on-campus room and hoard. $344 per quarter. On-campushousing $100-200 per quarter. Married student hou.4ing available.
17,2153
The following types of financial aid arc available: Scholarships:(deadline February 15th) ; Bask Edia-ational Opportunity Grant;( BEOG), National Direct Student Loan ( NDSL )`, College WorkStudy Program (CWSP ), Supplemental Educational OpportunityGrant (SEOG 1. ,
All programs except Scholarships and the BEOG require the Parents'Confidential Statement (PCS) to he processed. The Snow CollegeScholarship and financial aid application must be- completed for allprograms. Suggested financial aid application deadline is February15. Applications received after this date are considered on a firstcome, first serve basis, but are fully considered, 42%',of the studentsreceived some form of aid in 1974-75. M'erage aid $500. Maxi-mum $1,800.
Degree 96 quarter- hours, 1.7 average' on 4.0 scale reqUired. PrescribedRequirements courses: Associate in Science biological sciences, English;riuman-
ities, physical education-, phyical sciences, social sciences; for Asso-iate in Applied Science strong concentration in specific voca-
tional-technical areas with modifications of the "general education"requirements of the above listed degreeS. The Certificate of Comple-tion in 'technical areas also available and may be awarded at anY.,time in academic year that prescribed course is completed.
Divisions' - Natural Sciences; Social Sciences; Humanities and Arts; Industrialand Occupational EducatiOh; Physical EdUcation.
DIXIE COLLEGE (191 1) St. GeorgePresident: ferron C. LesseeAdministrative Offices: St. George, Utah 84770
Established 1911 as a 4-ye :ir high school° by the Church of JesusChrist of Latter-day Saints; junior college instruction added in 1916.Tho state assumed control in 1933. In 1963 the college separatedfrom the high school and moved to its present campus.
,Aefined pixie College, like its sister two-year institutions, provides generalRole ; instruction in a two-year college, with transfer, pre-matriculation,
general and authorized vocational opportunities. Close cooperationwith and encourakement of transfers to the Southern Utah StateCollege, within ,the System, is contemplated in view of, the closeproximity of these two institutions.
A 1 3154_
Calendar Quarter system. 'Regular session late September' to early June.Freshmen register September, January, and March. Degrees con-ferred in June. Siimmer session.
Admission Open dot admission policy. No application fee required. Applica-tions accepted up to the clay of registration.
Fees
StudentFinancial
Aid
Resident: Full-time tUition and fees $390 per School year: 'No21,resident: Full-time tuition and fees $786 per school year. On cam-pus room and hoard $900. Married student housing available,
Scholarship deadline is March I. Students should have a 3.5 gradepoint average to apply for available academic scholarships. Somedepartmental scholarships ,availablein Music, Art, Drama, Speech,Journalism and other programs. Natiorld Direct .,Student Loans,Educational Opportunity Grants, and Work-Study Programs, re-quire the Parents Confidential Statement.
Degree 96 quarter hours, 2.'0 average on.4.0 scale is required. To qualifyRequirements for, graduation, the student must successfully 4omplete at least 9
hours of credit in each of the following divisions: Life, . Physical andSocial Sciences, and Humanities, as well as complete'the FreshrhonEnglish, Physical -and Health' Education requirements. Studentairrnayearn up to 46 hourt, of CLEP credits, may obtain credit or classwaivers through advanced,.placement progranis, play obtain credit
, by examination,, or otherwise challengeany course in the curriculum.
Divisiops
StudentLife
Art, Biological Scren ''''''''Physical Education and R creation; P sical- sciences and Mathe
matics, Social Sciences' an Education Speech -and Theatre ArtsTrades, Aviation gy:upations,Business, Industrial Arts<Engi-
neering Technology and Graphic Nits..
ome Economics, Humanities, Music
Students not living With parents or tans must-live on campusor in college apprcked housing. pus located 315\tIes south of"Salt Lake7City in a city of aplroximately 12,000. _Yearbook, weekly
,---fiewsicaper, literary magaine., Major student activities and organi-zationsl National, state, and local fraternities and Clubs on campus.
'Major sports: football, basketball, baseball, tennis track.Competitive athletics for women-. Automobiles allowed on campus.
174155
COLLEGE !OF EASTERN UTAH (1937) PricePresident: Dean M. McDonaldAdministrative Offices: Price, Utah 84501
Established by' the legislature in 1937 as Carbon College, a 2-yearjunior college-high school, controlled by the State Board of Educa-tion. 'Abolished by an at of the Legislature in 1953 but .saved byreferendum. Became a branch of the University of Utah in 1959,dropping high whool program. In 1965 changed its namelo present,and in 1969 14carre independent from University of Utah, reportingto th'e State Board of Higher Education. Currently operrIting ascommunity college.
Defined The College of Eastern .Utah is a community college which providesRole educational opportunity of general and flexible nature, with pre-
matriculation,: vocational,' transfer, and general completion oppor-tunities. Situated in a city affording, special cultural ,advantages,populated with ,people of high ethical and educational standar&,.CEU affords ,outstanding opportunities as a well-integrated, two-year college.
'C a len da r Quarter system. Regular,,late September to early -June. Freshmenmay enter September, 'January, and March. "Degrees conferred inJune. Summer session : eight-week session, mid -June to mid- August.
Admission Open door admission policy. A five-dollar application fee is re-,quired.'cApplications received up to the day of registration.
Fees Resident: Full-time tuition and fees $372 per .school year. Non-. ° resident : Full-time tuition and fees $768
,$372per sal-rool. year. On cam-
pu:s room and board $798 per school year. Married housing available.
Scholarships along with National Direct Student Loan, Supplemen-tal Educational Opportunity Grant, Basic Educational Opportunity,Grant, and Student Work Study ,Programs are offered. Maximumfreshmen aid is $1,800 with the average being $550. ''Deadline forscholarship application is March 1, for 'all other aid April 1. Latedate for financial aid applicalions is August 1. The Parents Confi-dentialStatement isnrequired for all student aid.
StudentFinancial
Aid
Degreetkiremerits
Foret)-1, associatetlegree,-.(,t1....quarterliOnrs, 2.0 average required.courses: Life science 9-hours, English 6, humanities 9,
physical education 3, phy. .1 science 9, speech' 3, social science 9.
156
Divisions Humanities and Social Sciences, Natural Science, Applied Science(Business,-Nursing, Trade and Technical).
Student Some on-campus housing available. Campus is located in Price, aLife city of approximate y 7,0000 120 miles from Salt Lake City.. < Year-
book and newspap r. Majior student activities and organizations:student governmen service and religious groups, speech and dra-matics, frattmities music. Major sports: basketball, baseball, track,wrestling. Auto piles allowed on campus.
UTAH TEC " NICAL COLLEGE AT PROVO (1941)President: ikon W. SorensenAdministr lye Offices: 1395 North 150 East, Provo, Utah 84601
'Four sy ool districts in the Utah County area worked together toestal Fish the institution as Central fifth Vocational School in 1941.
de a state institution in 1947. Authorization 1967 to award thessociate in Applied Science Degree. Full accreditation by the
Northwest Association of Secondary and Higher Sc s in 1969.
Der Utah Technical College at Provo-emphasizes vocakXonal, technical,
tiand paraprofessional subjects. These are combined with authori edprograms in general education, including the two-year Asso ateApplied Science degree. ,With short-courses, evening coursescredit and non-credit the Utah Technical College at Provo pro-vides significant educational training and employment opportunities.Transfer possibilities, especially to Weber State College with its four-,year School of Technology, are open to graduates of. the: TechnicalColleges. Through individual advisement, transfer possibilities else-where in the System may be arranged. The Technical College offersthe vital technical training required for the conditions of modernlife, combined with essehtial liberal and general education. Underthe Higher Education Ad:t of 1969, these institutions have taken theirplace as significant elements of the Utah System of Higher Education.
Calendar Quarter system. Regular session early September to late May. Ffesh-men may enter in September. Degrees conferred in May andAugust.
Admission Open door admission policy. Application fee of $7 required.
Fees Resident: Full-time tuition and fee. $354 per school year. Non-resident: Full-time tuition an #fees $954 per school year. No cam-pus.,housing available (Community housing available):
178157
StudentFinancial
Aid
Scholarship deadline is February 1. Scholarships and tuitio waiversavailable. National Defense Student Loans, Economic OpportunityGrant* and Work-Study Programs require the Parents Confiden-tial *atement.
Degree 96 quarter hours, 2.0 average on 4.0 scale required. PrescribedRequirements courses: at least 24 hours selected from each of the following
sions: Humanities, SOCial Science, Biological and Physical Sciences,and Electives. Certificates'of Completion available.
Divisions Business, General and Related Education, Health Occupations,Technology, and Trade and Industrial.
Student College has a weekly newspaper. Activities include clubs, AssociatedLife Students, Associated Men Students, Associated Women Students and
Class Organizations, Intercollegiate and Intramural andPhysical Education programs. Major sports: baseball, rodeo' , andbasketball. Autorriobiles are allowed on campus. LDS. Institute ofReligion and other religious facilities convenient to campus.
UTAH TECHNICAL COLLEGE AT SALT LAKE (1947)Salt Lake
President: Jay L. Nelson 0
Administrative Offices: 4600 South Redwood Road,Salt Lake City, Utah 84107
Established in ,1917 by the Utah Legislature as Salt Lake Area Vo-cational School. Name changed to Salt kake 'Trade Technical In-stitute in 1959. The present qame originated in.. 1,967.
Defined, Utah Technical College at Salt Lake emphasizes vocational, tech-Role nical and paraprofessional subjects. These are combined with
authorized programs in general education, including the two.-year,Associate' of Applied Science degree. With short-courses, eveningcourses credit and non-credit the Utah technical colleges prO-r
7 vide significant educational training and employment opportunities.Transfer possibilities, especially to Weber State College withitsfour-year School of Technology, are open to graduates of the TechnicalColleges. Through individual advisement, transfer possibilities else-where in the System may be arranged. The Technical Colleges offer
0
'
the,vital technical training required for the conditions of modern life,combined with essential, liberal and 'general education. Under theHigher Education, Act of 1969, these institutions have t en theirplace as significant elements of the Utah System of Higher ducation.
Calendar Quarter system. Regular session, late September to early June.Freshmen may enter most courses any quarter. Summer session 0held from mid-June to late August. Degrees conferred in June andAugust.
Admission Open door policy. $5 application fee required. Applications shouldbe received 30 days prior to enrollment.
Fees -Resident: Full-time tuition and fees $360 per school year. Non-Resident : Full-time tuition and fees $960 per school year. Nocampus housing available.
StudentFinancial
Aid
Scholatships, along with National Direct Student Loan, EducationalOpportunity Grant and College Work Study Programs are offered.Maximum freshman aid is. $2,000. Deadline for scholarship appli-cations is April 1. Confidential Statement is required for all studentfederal aid.
Veterans Approved by Veterans Administration for veterans, surviving chil-Benefits dren and Mows, including work-study program.
Divisions Automotive, Metals, Business, Graphics, Health Occupations, Elec-,.
.tronicS, ted Instruction.. .
;,ft,, , t04 .4 41 . i e t
Degree ,Associate of Applied Scieni-e1 96 quarter hours, 1.9 average re-Requirements cfaired. Prescribed courses: Social science 6 hours, physical science
6 hours, humanities 6 hours, plus composite of above 6 hours. 6Cer-tificate of Completion available, and Diploma.
Student Periodic newspaper. Major student activities and organizationsLif6 Associated Students, class ortanizations, variety of service and special
organizations. Intramural sports. only. Automobiles allowed on'campus.
17r3159,
1'.
naCXr
Acadetnin Affairs4
Administrative Staff
BiidgetS and ,Finapce
Capital Facilities , 108
Appropriations 1'36
,Priority list ., I*8
CLEF.; Bulk.
y s , t '24
Corrin4slioner of Higher EducationReport of . . 1
Staff of , 2 .. ikv
Computing ifs the System 109p
ZContents . vi
Cost Per Student,credib.Hour , > 101.
Counties pro4clinggreatest enrollnieni , -120,'12.4°
Defined Roles . ...' .q(.se,e institUtional. protles)
.- ..Degrees Conftrred A 4 44.!, 32
4Comparative Chart ,tt
33. System Totals . ''''s 36
,,'Bachelot- awarcl- 39"Masier awards ' 4 . ,... 4 q r , 51Dory:irate awards '' ,,, 55 , A
-First professionaLawards., , '58 '
Associate awards "le 69..,
Certificates pfCompketion 70, 74, 78'Short course rerognitign --......, t 80 ,!, 0.
'Pearlier certification .--..4, 85,s,
Etlucatippt General krinues .47 , 98 1,
t..
Enrollment; \_,...-----:; ,,,, . , . ...
us 112Head121)3itttft '''' _
"FTE t, . ! 115By Ages, '' 12'3 14
By tAirlency- 116'By county , .., 120, 124, -129 *Foreign.
. .128. ,..e.
High School grduates t.''.4...120, 129-.,.
' States providing gieatest 'enrollment s ' 1, - ..130' '
4 ,
.
4
X V
.87
,
,Planning Model . EP . I 87
..-, .Migration arming Western States II 132:
Veterans ' . 135,Vti.cationailTecknical . .. ,, t 1.114 .
,Events of the Year 5,At.
Expenditures.for Operations96InstitutiOns ..:
Office of the Commissjoner ..... . ..... 93
Fees k A, 91, 95
Foreword w iii
High School Graduate Intentions 107
Inflation's Impact on Higher Education 90
Institutional Councils xi
Institutional ProfilesUniversity-of Utah 145
Utah State University 148
Weber State College. 150
SOuthern Utah State College 151
Snow College 153
Dille College, 154
College of Eastern Utah i 156
Utah Technical College/Pros?o 157
'Utah Technical College/Salt Lake 158
KUED - l 29
Legislative Appropriations. '0per:itions 87,^92
,capital Facilities 136
Legislative Study Committee on Higher Education ix
Live Births 105 .
Map of State 141
Office of the Com-missioner i S
Administrative Staff c5, xv
, . 'Revenue and ExPeriditures 93
Planning .1
Defined' ,"- 103Master Plan 103
'4 ,
'' Organization a 103
. .PrOidents .
Regents,-(see State Board of )
Role and Curricular StudiesIn Progress P 21
-"Role Assignments s 23Proposed programs approved 21
. Pr8g,rirns disapproved or discontinued 22
Changes in academic programs . "' 23Changes in System ,,
fr- 24
Revenue for OperationsInstitutions ,,, 96
Office of the Commissioner 93,
1 8162
,las
, Space Utilization4 Classrooms ! 140
Teaching Lab 'Oratories .i
142
State Board of Education xi,State Board of Rezents
CommitteesMembershipOffiters'Picture °;:,
t. ,
,,
.
,,
,
xiiiviiixiiialy:.
/'=".4 Statewiclucational Television 29
Statewide Programs 93
Student Credit Hours 'Produc'ed . 100
7, Study Committee, LegislativeiTable Indexes' ,
xi
Degrees Conferred 34 0Budgets and Finance 92
.Planning arid Capital Facilities 110
Teacher Certificationx Number recommended 83
Accepting, Utah psrtlons 85
f aii6n and Fees---"------ ca
, 95
Vete s u * ,,
Approval program 27
Enrollments 135
Qualifying Institutions ' 27
Graduates , 135
"VocatioLal-Technical Education , iv
Enrollments , 114
Planning Report , 20Flexile, System Model 20
.
4
WICHERepgrt 26Budget 93
V