The triple bottom line

69
MANAGING THE TRIPLE BOTTOM LINE MARCH 15, 2016 DOGWE, ALEXIS EUSEBIO, CAMILLE GONZALES, MAURICE TANDOC, LESLEE MAY TATING, AL MARIE UNIVERSITY OF THE PHILIPPINES TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT CENTER Under the Management of Prof. Ed Cruz

Transcript of The triple bottom line

Page 1: The triple bottom line

MANAGING THE TRIPLE BOTTOM LINE

MARCH 15, 2016

DOGWE, ALEXISEUSEBIO, CAMILLEGONZALES, MAURICETANDOC, LESLEE MAYTATING, AL MARIE

UNIVERSITY OF THE PHILIPPINESTECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT CENTER

Under the Management of Prof. Ed Cruz

Page 2: The triple bottom line

OUTLINEA. The Triple Bottom LineB. Corporate Social

ResponsibilityC. Serving BOP MarketsD. The Digital DivideE. Responding to Global

Climate Change in the Corporate World

F. Framework for Navigating Ethical Issues

Page 3: The triple bottom line

THE TRIPLE BOTTOM LINE

Page 4: The triple bottom line

PEOPLEoSocial structure of the organizationoStakeholders of the projectoEnsures fair trade and ethical practices are observed within the eco-system of the organization

Page 5: The triple bottom line

PLANEToFor a business to survive, it has to earn profit but needs to understand sustainabilityoSustainability

Page 7: The triple bottom line

DOMAINS

Page 8: The triple bottom line

EconomicCompetitivePoliticalSocio-CulturalTechnologicalNatural ResourcesChanges in the

environment that should be taken into

consideration

Page 9: The triple bottom line

DOMAINSECONOMIC COMPETITIVE

Page 10: The triple bottom line

DOMAINSPOLITICAL SOCIO - DEMOGRAPHIC

Page 11: The triple bottom line

DOMAINSTECHNOLOGICAL NATURAL RESOURCES

Page 12: The triple bottom line

BUSINESS INITIATIVES THAT MOLD ECONOMIC OBJECTIVES

WITH SOCIAL WELFARE

Page 13: The triple bottom line

RECAP

1. People2. Planet3. Profit

Triple Bottom Line

Corporate Social ResponsibilityBusiness initiatives that mold economic objectives (profit) with social welfare

Page 14: The triple bottom line

RECAP

oEconomicoCompetitiveoRegulatory

oSocio demographicsoTechnologicaloNatural Resources

Key Domains for the Triple Bottom Line

Page 15: The triple bottom line

DEBATES & CRITICISMS, DESIRED OUTCOMES, DOMAINS, MODELS &

APPROACHES OF CSR

Page 16: The triple bottom line

DEBATES AND CRITICISMS OVER CSR Should firms engage in CSR?

Page 17: The triple bottom line

DEBATES AND CRITICISMS OVER CSR Is it truly CSR if company benefits?

Page 18: The triple bottom line

DESIRED OUTCOMES OF CSR Business GoalsDriving revenue growth through CSR initiatives

Social GoalsImprove quality of life and to build capacity in disadvantaged communities

Page 19: The triple bottom line

CSR DOMAINS PEOPLEPeople includes employees, suppliers, customers, people in the local community where the business operates, or society as a whole.

PLANETEngaging in environmentally responsible, sustainable business practices.

Page 20: The triple bottom line

CROPITAL

Page 21: The triple bottom line

MODELS OF AND APPROACHES TO CSR Business Case Model The ability of CSR to create positive business results

CSR is viewed as relevant only when it translates unambiguously to competitive advantage.

Page 22: The triple bottom line

MODELS OF AND APPROACHES TO CSR Social Values ModelSocial issue is the “force” that drives the organization

Page 23: The triple bottom line

MODELS OF AND APPROACHES TO CSR Syncretic Stewardship ModelSyncretize means “To unite and harmonize”

Combines, integrates, negotiates and balances the competing claims of varied stakeholders.

Model 1:Business Case

Model 2: Social Values

Model 3: Syncretic Stewardship Model

Page 24: The triple bottom line

MEASURING OUTCOMES AND EFFECTIVENESS OF CSR INITIATIVES

Page 25: The triple bottom line

MEASURING OUTCOMES AND EFFECTIVENESS OF CSR INITIATIVES How does a company evaluate its performance for the triple bottom line?

How does a company's social performance relate to its financial performance?

Page 26: The triple bottom line

EVALUATING TRIPLE BOTTOM LINE PERFORMANCE AccountAbility and CSR Network: Strategy, Governance, Stakeholder Involvement, Follow-through

Vodaphone (#5, with a score of 66.3) Deutsche Telekom (#33)

GE (#13, with a score of 59.1) Sony (#34)

Toyota (#38) HP (#24)

Siemens (#41) Toshiba (#30)

Page 27: The triple bottom line

EVALUATING TRIPLE BOTTOM LINE PERFORMANCE

Page 28: The triple bottom line

EVALUATING TRIPLE BOTTOM LINE PERFORMANCE

o Companies must evaluate their social and environmental performanceo A company should proactively monitor its own performance, using one of the generally accepted frameworks

Page 29: The triple bottom line

EVALUATING TRIPLE BOTTOM LINE PERFORMANCE

AccountAbility's AA1000 standard

Verite's Monitoring Guidelines to assess sweatshop labor and labor abuses

Social Accountability International's SA8000 standard for human rights

The FTSE4Good Index, an evaluation of CSR performance of companies

GlobeScan's Corporate Social Responsibility Monitor

SOCIAL ACCOUNTING

Page 30: The triple bottom line

EVALUATING TRIPLE BOTTOM LINE PERFORMANCEEnvironmental GuidelinesoThe Global Reporting Initiative's Sustainability Reporting Guidelines oCERES oInstitute 4 Sustainability oGreen Globe Certification/Standard oThe ISO 14000 environmental management standard

Page 31: The triple bottom line

CORPORATE SOCIAL PERFORMANCE AND ITS FINANCIALPERFORMANCE

attract quality employees and customer loyalty

VS additional leverage

create new opportunities raise the firm's costs

unnecessary expenditures

detract from its focus on profit

Page 32: The triple bottom line

CORPORATE SOCIAL PERFORMANCE AND ITS FINANCIALPERFORMANCE

From Innovest Rankings: Companies that received relatively high scores for corporate social responsibility (including BP and Sony) but whose financial (stock market) values did not perform well.

Companies that received lower scores for corporate social performance (including Apple and Nintendo) but whose stock market prices did perform well.

Page 33: The triple bottom line

BEST-PRACTICES CSR FOR HIGH TECH COMPANIES

Page 34: The triple bottom line

BEST-PRACTICES CSR Link CSR to Business Strategy

Supply/input conditionsMicrosoft - information technology education infrastructure GlaxoSmithKline - access of poor people to medications and vaccines attract scientists.

Demand/customer conditionsCompetitive contextSupporting infrastructure

Page 35: The triple bottom line

BEST-PRACTICES CSR Measure the impact of CSR

Balance competing stakeholder interests

Collaborate with relevant partners

Page 36: The triple bottom line

BEST-PRACTICES CSR Beware of unintended reputation effects (Hypocrisy)

oFocus CSR initiatives into areas unrelated to the firm’s business

oAvoid using socially responsible behaviors for compensating socially irresponsible ones

Page 37: The triple bottom line

BEST-PRACTICES CSREmbed CSR in senior leadership

and in organizational reward

Link CSR to Innovation

Page 38: The triple bottom line

SERVING BOP MARKETS CSR & Social

Entrepreneurship

Page 39: The triple bottom line

BOP: BASE OF PYRAMID

Page 40: The triple bottom line

PHILIPPINES & USA

LOWER CLASS(< $35k annual household income)

MIDDLE CLASS($35k - $200k annual

household income)

UPPER CLASS(> $200k annual household income)5.6%

60.6%

33.8%

Gov’t / NGO Assistance NGO Corp Donations/

Philantrophy Enlightened CSR/

Social Entrepreneurship

Page 41: The triple bottom line

DOMAINS FOR INTERVENTION

2 Dimensions: 1. Happens in top or base of the

pyramid2. Caused by a crisis or is

chronic

CRISIS

CHRONIC

BOP TOP

1 2

3 4

AID/DONATIONS

CAPACITY BUILDING

Page 42: The triple bottom line

THE 10 GREAT DIVIDES1. Demographic Divide2. Financial Divide3. Nutritional Divide4. Natural Resource Divide5. Environmental Divide6. Health Divide7. Gender Divide8. Educational Divide9. Digital Divide10. Security Divide

Page 43: The triple bottom line

BUSINESS MODELS TO SOLVE BOP

BOP 1.0 “Selling to the Poor”

Potential customers Deep listening Reduce price Redesign packaging Extend distribution Mediated by NGOs

BOP 2.0 “Business Co-Venturing”

Business partners Deep dialogue Expand imagination Build shared commitment Marry capabilities Direct, personal relationships facilitated by NGOs

“ENLIGHTENED” CSR

View of PeopleModel of EngagementBusiness Solution

Nature of Relationship

Page 44: The triple bottom line
Page 45: The triple bottom line
Page 46: The triple bottom line
Page 47: The triple bottom line
Page 48: The triple bottom line

BUSINESS MODELS TO SOLVE BOP

Power of small businesses to create innovative solutions Belief that everyone has innate capacity to contribute to development Primary focus is value creation Willing to share insights & innovations

SOCIAL ENTREPRENEURSHIP

Phase I: Opening Up

Phase II: Building the Ecosystem

Phase III: Enterprise Creation

CO-CREATION

Page 49: The triple bottom line

SOCIAL ENTREPRENEURSHIPLEVERAGED

NONPROFIT VENTUREDrive adoption of innovation Requires external partners for support One Laptop Per Child Organization

HYBRID NONPROFIT VENTURE

Recover portion of cost Sets up several legal entities EnvirofitAravind Eye Care

SOCIAL BUSINESS VENTURE

For-profit business setup Reinvest profits to grow the venture and reach more people

Page 50: The triple bottom line

5 KEY AREAS TO CONSIDER DISTRIBUTION• Poor roads, high transportation cost• Localize value creation PRICING• Price needs to be slashed• “Surplus revenue” to subsidize• Community based pricing

OPEN SOURCE & LICENSING• Rely on open source models to reuse, adapt or modify

RESPONDING TO FAILURE• Fail early & fail fast • Learning labs for new insights

MEASUREMENT CHALLENGES• BOP impact assessment framework

1 3

2 4

5

Page 51: The triple bottom line

THE DIGITAL DIVIDE

Page 52: The triple bottom line

THE DIGITAL DIVIDE Disparity in technology access between:

o Socioeconomic groupso Geographic areaso Ethnic groupso Countries

“if technology revolution leaves some behind, all will suffer”

Page 53: The triple bottom line

SOLUTIONS TO THE DIGITAL DIVIDE Public Policy Nonprofit Ventures Training & education Market-based solutions Mobile telephony

Mobile Telephony• Cheaper phones• Market preference over other gadgets• Provides access to different apps

Page 54: The triple bottom line

UBP + GLOBE = VIDEO

Page 55: The triple bottom line

RESPONDING TO GLOBAL CLIMATE CHANGE IN THE

CORPORATE WORLD

Page 56: The triple bottom line
Page 57: The triple bottom line
Page 58: The triple bottom line

ADDRESSING ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTSCap and TradeCarbon OffsetsBest Practices Environmental Strategy: Four-Step ApproachNatural Capitalism

Page 59: The triple bottom line

CAP AND TRADE

Page 60: The triple bottom line

CARBON OFFSETS

Page 61: The triple bottom line

BEST PRACTICES ENVIRONMENTAL STRATEGY: A FOUR-STEP APPROACH

Quantify the company’s carbon footprint.

Assess carbon-related risks and opportunities.

Adapt the company’s business strategy.

Stay ahead of competitors.

Page 62: The triple bottom line

NATURAL CAPITALISMDramatically increase the

productivity of natural resources

Shift to biologically

inspired production models

Engage in “solutions-based”

thinking

Reinvest in natural capital

Page 63: The triple bottom line

CHALLENGES FOR ENVIRONMENTALLY RESPONSIBLE BUSINESS PRACTICES

unintended consequences

• Use of crops for human consumption for processing biofuels

greenwashing

• energy-efficient electronics that have hazardous materials

• products claiming to be “organic” without verifiable proof

fairness and equity for

developing nations

• growth in China, India and other developing countries cause GHG emissions to also rise (1/3 of global emissions as of 2004)

Page 64: The triple bottom line

FRAMEWORK FOR NAVIGATING ETHICAL ISSUES

Page 65: The triple bottom line

FRAMEWORK FOR NAVIGATING ETHICAL ISSUES

Identify all stakeholders

who are affected by the

situation

For each stakeholder

group, identify its needs and

concerns, both if the decision

is implemented and if decision

is not implemented.

Prioritize the stakeholder groups and

perspectives.

Make and implement a

decision.

Page 66: The triple bottom line

FRAMEWORK FOR NAVIGATING ETHICAL ISSUES

Case Study: Merck and the Cure to River-blindness in 1978, onchocerciasis or “river-blindness” plagued at least 85 million peoplecaused by a parasitic worm carried by a tiny black fly that thrives along fast-moving riversthe larvae the adult worm reproduces invades the eyes and often cause blindnessdisease was so prevalent that children thought blindness is part of growing up Merck has discovered that a drug which was used to eliminate insect-borne parasites in cows also has properties that can eliminate the cause of river-blindness

Page 67: The triple bottom line

FRAMEWORK FOR NAVIGATING ETHICAL ISSUES

Identify all stakeholders

who are affected by the situation

• shareholders• public at large• Third World population• government• employees

For each stakeholder

group, identify its needs and

concerns, both if the decision is implemented

and if decision is not

implemented.• negative impacts on

profits vs negative publicity

• favorable vs insincere• quality of life

enhanced vs backlash against corporations in developing countries

• expedite approval process vs possible intervention to require licensing

• belt-tightening/ lay-offs vs de-moralization

Prioritize the stakeholder groups and

perspectives.

• “We try never to forget that medicine is for the people. It is not for profits. The profits follow, and if we have remembered that, they have never failed to appear. The better we have remembered it, the larger they have been.”

Make and implement a

decision.

• pursue the study of the drug

Page 68: The triple bottom line

WRAP-UP

People• Corporate Social

Responsibility• Social

Entrepreneurship• Serving BOP

Markets• Bridging the

Digital DivideProfit

Planet• Corporate Social

Responsibility• Environmental

Strategy Best Practices

• Natural Capitalism

• Cap and Trade

Page 69: The triple bottom line

REFERENCES1. Marketing of High Technology Products & Innovations by Jakki

Mohr et al.2. http://www.investopedia.com/terms/t/triple-bottom-line.asp3. The Economist – The Triple Bottomline4. https://

www.cdp.net/CDPResults/carbon-action-infographic-2015.PDF