The Tibet-China Conflict: History and Polemics

80
Policy Studies 7 The Tibet-China Conflict: History and Polemics Elliot Sperling East-West Center Washington

Transcript of The Tibet-China Conflict: History and Polemics

Page 1: The Tibet-China Conflict: History and Polemics

Policy Studies 7

The Tibet-China Conflict:History and Polemics

Elliot Sperling

East-West Center Washington

Page 2: The Tibet-China Conflict: History and Polemics

Policy StudiesA Publication of the East-West Center Washington

Editor: Dr. Muthiah AlagappaThe aim of Policy Studies is to present scholarly analysis of key contemporary domesticand international political, economic, and strategic issues affecting Asia in a policy rel-evant manner. Written for the policy community, academics, journalists, and theinformed public, the peer-reviewed publications in this series will provide new policyinsights and perspectives based on extensive fieldwork and rigorous scholarship.

Each publication in the series presents a 15,000 to 25,000 investigation of a singletopic. Often publications in this series will appear in conjunction with East-WestCenter research projects; stand-alone investigations of pertinent issues will also appearin the series.

Submissions Submissions may take the form of a proposal or completed manuscript.

Proposal. A three to five page proposal should indicate the issue, problem, or puzzle tobe analyzed, its policy significance, the novel perspective to be provided, and date bywhich the manuscript will be ready. The editor and two relevant experts will reviewproposals to determine their suitability for the series. The manuscript when completedwill be peer-reviewed in line with the double blind process.

Complete Manuscript. Submission of complete manuscript should be accompanied by atwo page abstract that sets out the issue, problem, or puzzle analyzed, its policy signifi-cance, and the novel perspective provided by the paper. The editor and two relevantexperts will review the abstract. If considered suitable for the series, the manuscript willbe peer reviewed in line with the double blind process.

Submissions must be original and not published elsewhere. The East-West CenterWashington will have copyright over material published in the series.

A CV indicating relevant qualifications and publications should accompany submissions.

Notes to Contributors

Manuscripts should be typed and double-spaced. Citations should be inserted in thetext with notes double-spaced at the end. The manuscript should be accompanied by acompleted bibliography. All artwork should be camera ready. Authors should refrainfrom identifying themselves in their proposals and manuscripts and should follow thePolicy Studies stylesheet, available from the series’ editorial office. Submissions shouldbe sent to:

Editor, Policy StudiesEast-West Center Washington1819 L Street NW, Suite 200

Washington, D.C. 20036

Submissions can also be forwarded by Email to [email protected]

Page 3: The Tibet-China Conflict: History and Polemics
Page 4: The Tibet-China Conflict: History and Polemics
Page 5: The Tibet-China Conflict: History and Polemics
Page 6: The Tibet-China Conflict: History and Polemics
Page 7: The Tibet-China Conflict: History and Polemics
Page 8: The Tibet-China Conflict: History and Polemics
Page 9: The Tibet-China Conflict: History and Polemics
Page 10: The Tibet-China Conflict: History and Polemics
Page 11: The Tibet-China Conflict: History and Polemics
Page 12: The Tibet-China Conflict: History and Polemics
Page 13: The Tibet-China Conflict: History and Polemics
Page 14: The Tibet-China Conflict: History and Polemics
Page 15: The Tibet-China Conflict: History and Polemics
Page 16: The Tibet-China Conflict: History and Polemics
Page 17: The Tibet-China Conflict: History and Polemics
Page 18: The Tibet-China Conflict: History and Polemics
Page 19: The Tibet-China Conflict: History and Polemics
Page 20: The Tibet-China Conflict: History and Polemics
Page 21: The Tibet-China Conflict: History and Polemics
Page 22: The Tibet-China Conflict: History and Polemics
Page 23: The Tibet-China Conflict: History and Polemics
Page 24: The Tibet-China Conflict: History and Polemics
Page 25: The Tibet-China Conflict: History and Polemics
Page 26: The Tibet-China Conflict: History and Polemics
Page 27: The Tibet-China Conflict: History and Polemics
Page 28: The Tibet-China Conflict: History and Polemics
Page 29: The Tibet-China Conflict: History and Polemics
Page 30: The Tibet-China Conflict: History and Polemics
Page 31: The Tibet-China Conflict: History and Polemics
Page 32: The Tibet-China Conflict: History and Polemics
Page 33: The Tibet-China Conflict: History and Polemics
Page 34: The Tibet-China Conflict: History and Polemics
Page 35: The Tibet-China Conflict: History and Polemics
Page 36: The Tibet-China Conflict: History and Polemics
Page 37: The Tibet-China Conflict: History and Polemics
Page 38: The Tibet-China Conflict: History and Polemics
Page 39: The Tibet-China Conflict: History and Polemics
Page 40: The Tibet-China Conflict: History and Polemics
Page 41: The Tibet-China Conflict: History and Polemics
Page 42: The Tibet-China Conflict: History and Polemics
Page 43: The Tibet-China Conflict: History and Polemics
Page 44: The Tibet-China Conflict: History and Polemics
Page 45: The Tibet-China Conflict: History and Polemics
Page 46: The Tibet-China Conflict: History and Polemics
Page 47: The Tibet-China Conflict: History and Polemics
Page 48: The Tibet-China Conflict: History and Polemics
Page 49: The Tibet-China Conflict: History and Polemics
Page 50: The Tibet-China Conflict: History and Polemics
Page 51: The Tibet-China Conflict: History and Polemics
Page 52: The Tibet-China Conflict: History and Polemics
Page 53: The Tibet-China Conflict: History and Polemics
Page 54: The Tibet-China Conflict: History and Polemics
Page 55: The Tibet-China Conflict: History and Polemics
Page 56: The Tibet-China Conflict: History and Polemics
Page 57: The Tibet-China Conflict: History and Polemics
Page 58: The Tibet-China Conflict: History and Polemics
Page 59: The Tibet-China Conflict: History and Polemics
Page 60: The Tibet-China Conflict: History and Polemics
Page 61: The Tibet-China Conflict: History and Polemics
Page 62: The Tibet-China Conflict: History and Polemics
Page 63: The Tibet-China Conflict: History and Polemics
Page 64: The Tibet-China Conflict: History and Polemics
Page 65: The Tibet-China Conflict: History and Polemics
Page 66: The Tibet-China Conflict: History and Polemics
Page 67: The Tibet-China Conflict: History and Polemics
Page 68: The Tibet-China Conflict: History and Polemics
Page 69: The Tibet-China Conflict: History and Polemics
Page 70: The Tibet-China Conflict: History and Polemics
Page 71: The Tibet-China Conflict: History and Polemics
Page 72: The Tibet-China Conflict: History and Polemics
Page 73: The Tibet-China Conflict: History and Polemics
Page 74: The Tibet-China Conflict: History and Polemics
Page 75: The Tibet-China Conflict: History and Polemics
Page 76: The Tibet-China Conflict: History and Polemics
Page 77: The Tibet-China Conflict: History and Polemics
Page 78: The Tibet-China Conflict: History and Polemics
Page 79: The Tibet-China Conflict: History and Polemics

East-West CenterThe East-West Center is an internationally recognized education andresearch organization established by the U.S. Congress in 1960 tostrengthen understanding and relations between the United States andthe countries of the Asia Pacific. Through its programs of cooperativestudy, training, seminars, and research, the Center works to promote astable, peaceful and prosperous Asia Pacific community in which theUnited States is a leading and valued partner. Funding for the Centercomes for the U.S. government, private foundations, individuals, cor-porations and a number of Asia Pacific governments.

East-West Center WashingtonEstablished on September 1, 2001, the primary function of the East-West Center Washington is to further the East-West Center missionand the institutional objective of building a peaceful and prosperousAsia Pacific community through substantive programming activitiesfocused on the theme of conflict reduction in the Asia Pacific regionand promoting American understanding of and engagement in AsiaPacific affairs.

Page 80: The Tibet-China Conflict: History and Polemics

About this Issue

About the Author

Dr. Elliot Sperling is Associate Professor and Chair of the Department of Central EurasianStudies at Indiana University at Bloomington.

The status of Tibet has been at the core ofthe Tibet-China conflict for all partiesdrawn into it over the past century. Chinamaintains that Tibet is an integral part ofChina, while Tibetans maintain that Tibet hashistorically been an independent country. Inreality the conflict over Tibet’s status hasbeen a conflict over history. When Chinesewriters and political figures assert that Tibetis a part of China, they do so on the basisof history. The People’s Republic of Chinahas pointedly accused the Dalai Lama ofduplicity, stating that his unwillingness torecognize that Tibet has been an integralpart of China for centuries renders hisattempts to compromise on the Tibet issueunacceptable. The centrality of history inthe question of Tibet’s status could not bemade clearer. This paper is a guide to thehistorical arguments made by the primaryparties to the Tibet-China conflict. It drawson the key assertions about the issue asthey have been framed in Chinese andTibetan to examine the extent to whichpositions on the Tibet issue that arethought to reflect centuries of popularconsensus are actually very recent construc-tions, often at variance with the history onwhich they claim to be based.

ISBN 1-932728-12-0

Previous Issues:Policy Studies 1The Aceh Peace Process: Why it FailedDr. Edward Aspinall, University of SydneyDr. Harold Crouch, Australian National University

Policy Studies 2The Free Aceh Movement (GAM):Anatomy of a Separatist OrganizationDr. Kirsten E. Schulze, London School ofEconomics

Policy Studies 3Security Operations in Aceh:Goals, Consequences, and LessonsDr. Rizal Sukma, Centre for Strategic andInternational Studies - Jakarta

Policy Studies 4Beijing’s Tibet Policy:Securing Sovereignty and LegitimacyDr. Allen Carlson, Cornell University

Policy Studies 5The Papua Conflict:Jakarta’s Perceptions and PoliciesDr. Richard Chauvel,Victoria University-MelbourneDr. Ikrar Nusa Bhakti, Indonesian Institute ofSciences

Policy Studies 6A Violent Separatism in Xinjiang:A Critical AssessmentDr. James Millward, Georgetown University

Forthcoming Titles“The Moro Conflict: Landlessness andMisdirected State Policies”Mr. Eric Gutiereez, Institute for Popular DemocracyDr. Saturnino M. Borras, Institute of Social Sciences-The Hague

“Southern Philippines and the InternationalWar Against Terror”Dr. Christopher Collier,Australian National University