THE THREE LEVELS OF PERCEPTIONTEACHING ON THE THREE VISIONS (SNANG GSUM) OF THE SAKYAPAby Dzongsar...
-
Upload
teong-hin-ooi -
Category
Documents
-
view
410 -
download
16
Embed Size (px)
description
Transcript of THE THREE LEVELS OF PERCEPTIONTEACHING ON THE THREE VISIONS (SNANG GSUM) OF THE SAKYAPAby Dzongsar...

THE THREE LEVELS OF PERCEPTION
TEACHING ON THE THREE VISIONS (SNANG GSUM) OF
THE SAKYAPA
(Singapore 2003) by Dzongsar Jamyang Khyentse
Rinpoche
http://www.sakyatenphelling.org/buddhism/recorded-teachings/

THE THREE LEVELS OF PERCEPTION
TEACHING ON THE THREE VISIONS (SNANG GSUM) OF THE
SAKYAPA
(Singapore 2003) by Dzongsar Jamyang Khyentse Rinpoche … 1/48
We begin with discussing motivation. That got to be a good reason why you are
here. There are lots of things to do, especially during the weekends and you have
sacrificed those. And you are HERE, especially some of you have heard these
particular teachings many, many times and yet you have decided to sacrifice lots of
things and be here.
Of course at glance, we can say we, we are here to receive teachings. We are here
to listen to the dharma and at times we do this because it is a traditional thing to do
or because it is the right thing to do or some of you may be doing it because you’re
obliged to do, you understand. Because some kind of religious teacher happens to
be here and he’s talking and if you are not here, you know especially we Asians, we
might lose face. We, we fill that we should fill up the room at least. That could be the
motivation. We don’t know.
It’s important REALLY to check our motivation. Hopefully the motivation is triggered
with wish to receive these teachings so that one will achieve enlightenment. I say
this hopefully because most of the time when we practice, when we hear teachings
or when we’re practicing the dharma, most of the time we don’t do it for
enlightenment. Enlightenment is almost like eh, if it happens that’s good but if it
doesn’t happen, it’s also okay.
Most of the time, we go to temple, we go to teachings because we like to live
happily. We want to make the life easier, happier, isn’t it? Especially this is the Asian
weakness, I think. We go; we chant mantras for long life. That’s not, long life is not

enlightenment. Long life is long life. And we don’t know by having long life, we are
going to have a better life.
We receive teachings so that one is successful in whatever you are doing. Being
successful is not necessarily enlightenment. So this is why I am stressing – what
kind of motivation do you have, do I have, do we all have? See ideally so-called long
life, success, good health, good marriage, good relationship – all these should be
what we call ‘side bonus’. For the bodhisattvas, for the practitioners like us, these
should be the bonus. Enlightenment should be the real goal, the ultimate goal. That
should be our goal.
THE THREE LEVELS OF PERCEPTION
TEACHING ON THE THREE VISIONS (SNANG GSUM) OF THE
SAKYAPA
(Singapore 2003) by Dzongsar Jamyang Khyentse Rinpoche … 2/48
And I’m stressing this because if, if our aim is wrong, right; if our aim, if our ultimate
aim – I’m, I’m talking about two kinds of aim, ultimate goal or the aim, and the
relative bonus, temporary bonus, relative goal. If our, if we have the right aim,
especially the ultimate aim, then EVEN if something falls apart in our day-to-day life,
the trust to the Triple Gem, trust to the guru, trust to the path – will always be there.
Otherwise in the course of my being Buddhist all this time, I have seen so many
people coming to the buddhadharma, hoping so that, they, their samsaric you know
activity will be successful. That’s their ultimate aim, coming with that kind of
motivation. And then of course our lives – so many things go wrong – the nature of
life. Okay today we’re happy but who knows what happens tomorrow.

A tomato stuck in your throat while you’re enjoying nice food in some of these
wonderful hawker centres and then that will be it. Your life is, has reached to the
end, all because of a stupid tomato. And this COULD HAPPEN. Life is totally fragile.
That’s something we have, that we so dearly clutch and grasp to, and that’s our life
and sadly life the most fragile. Everything is, especially now; so fast, so fragile. And I
have seen many people with this kind of motivation.
They come to the dharma, practice the dharma and then of course, something goes
wrong and then they lose trust to the Triple Gem - oh, you know Buddha is not
helping us. See the approach to the Buddha is very theistic like any religion, like
Christians or Hindus; maybe not Hindus but Muslims. That, if you have that kind of
attitude or motivation, then you, your action, what you’re applying and your view is
contradicting. So this is why I ask to really analyse why we are here. It’s good to
analyse like that, even if it is intellectually.
I am supposed to go through the most profound teaching coming from Virupa, the
saint Virupa, and Gayadhara, Drokmi Lotsawa and all the great Sakyapa masters.
The teaching is called ‘Lam Dre’. Of course I’m not giving you the complete Lam Dre
but the beginning portion, the preliminary portion called ‘Triple Vision’. I think that’s
what it is called although the ‘vision’ is not really the right word, I think. ‘Snang Gsum’
anyway; I will be explaining very briefly with a lot of reasons - first I don’t know it
myself thoroughly, secondly VERY LAZY.
I used to have at least some kind of pride and ego to talk. I’m not saying that I don’t
have ego anymore but the laziness has taken over that. So even talking, teaching is
so tiring. So the laziness, because of the laziness, the teaching is not happening
very thoroughly. And also I guess the timing, but I think between today and
tomorrow, we can approach to the great Snang Gsum, the teaching, the Triple Vision
in a practical way, let’s say, let’s call it practical way.
THE THREE LEVELS OF PERCEPTION

TEACHING ON THE THREE VISIONS (SNANG GSUM) OF THE
SAKYAPA
(Singapore 2003) by Dzongsar Jamyang Khyentse Rinpoche … 3/48
And this is VERY SPECIAL teaching. It has the complete path for enlightenment and
really important. Why we receive this teaching, that sort of motivation or the reason,
is finalized; because you see this is why the word ‘vision’ I don’t like. Is that
translated as ‘vision’? Vision, yeah; I think it’s a little misleading personally. I think I
would call it ‘perception’ because Virupa or the great Sakyapa masters are not
composing a special vision here, you understand. I think ‘vision’ is alright but it could
mislead.
We are not constructing a new vision and inserting this, programing this vision inside
your head so that your vision will change. We are not doing that, okay. See life, life,
so-called life – people ask the question “What is the purpose of life?” But even
before you ask this question: ‘What is the purpose of life?’ – What IS LIFE? This
question you should ask: “What is life?”
According to the Sakyapa masters, life is nothing but a perception. It is a continuous
perception; perception after perception, that’s life. So ‘Snang Gsum’ like this path,
what it does is, it is, it ALTERS so to speak, REDECORATES this perception. We
already have a certain perception, a lot of perceptions which we will talk, okay.
What we are now going to do is we are going to redecorate this perception. We are
going to place them. We are going to manipulate them. We are going to eh, work
with it, work with the perception. AND THEN FINALLY you will have a different kind
of perception, different kind, different way of looking at things; and that is what we
call enlightenment.
Yeah so this is quite important because you hear this teaching. See in our heads
most of the time, enlightenment is something tangible. The moment we talk about
enlightenment, we are talking about a stage, a place, some kind of body, some kind
of dimension which has thirty- two major marks, eighty minor marks and all these
complicated descriptions. But if you really make it very easy and down-to-earth kind

of language, enlightenment is actually; eh, simply enlightenment is an absence of
paranoia. That’s it. I’m, I am sure some of the more conservative Buddhists might
raise their eyebrow but that’s fine. I, I, I can talk with them.
It’s basically an absence of paranoia. And there is so much paranoia ALL the time,
and do you know why there’s all this paranoia? Perceptions – basically you are
looking at me right now – I am your perception. I am looking at you – you are my
perception. Between you and me at the moment, there is no too dramatic perception
because somehow eh, we don’t know so much, right. We don’t know.
THE THREE LEVELS OF PERCEPTION
TEACHING ON THE THREE VISIONS (SNANG GSUM) OF THE
SAKYAPA
(Singapore 2003) by Dzongsar Jamyang Khyentse Rinpoche … 4/48
And between you and me there’s a kind of a big distance, not only physical distance
like you’re sitting on the floor and I’m sitting on a chair, higher. But there’s a certain
sort of advertisement happened before - a Tibetan, a master, this, that. So those,
especially those who, who have never seen me before, you must have a certain
perception about me, you understand.
I’m sure some of you have really very; some of you must think – oh, you know he is
like the bodhisattva you know this and that. Some of you must be already thinking –
'Can we trust this man, you understand?' And some of you are just thinking – 'When
is this going to end?' An hour and a half more, you know depending, depending on
different kinds of motivation again. It's always going back to the motivation. So there
must be lots of perception.

Now I'll give you an example. Okay so we might get closer, right, closer; we might
have, eh, we might talk, and then our perceptions get more solid. And then we might
have dinner or lunches, or we might see more and more. And then perceptions get
more solid and more sophisticated because BY THEN the perception is diluted with
expectation, hope and fear. Hope to see each other more or hope not to see,
depending on your motivation again; okay depend totally on your motivation.
So anyway there is a perception, continuous perception between you and me. And
then some of you, okay let's choose those who like me. Let's say some of you have
decided to like me. Then you can paint all kinds of picture about me - 'Wow, he's the
greatest, all of that; he is the greatest this, this, this, that'. Okay and then I stay with
you FOREVER, let's say.
And then one day someone whom you trust a lot tells you - 'Be careful; you know this
man has a tail; you know tail growing every full moon' (laughter). Very seriously he
tells you - this man has tail growing you know every full moon. I, I bet the way you
look at me will be influenced; it's already influenced. The way you look at me, the
way you relate to me - you will change, right. What happened?
The perception is now altered. It's redecorated; it's now manipulated. Now you, you
will not want to be in the same room, especially in the full moon night alone. You
know you used to be talking to me very freely and no fear, complete trust. But now
you will have to think twice. And every time I go to bathroom, you might be
wondering - Where does he put his tail? Things like that, isn't it? Perception has
changed now about this man and I'm giving just a very vague example. I'm sure this
has happened in your life a lot. I am sure, very sure.
THE THREE LEVELS OF PERCEPTION
TEACHING ON THE THREE VISIONS (SNANG GSUM) OF THE
SAKYAPA
(Singapore 2003) by Dzongsar Jamyang Khyentse Rinpoche … 5/48

How many times have you fall in love? - So many times, those who have been lucky
with the love anyway. And when you are in love, this person whom you love - My
god, they are the perfect, isn't it? You think about them day and night. You can't
taste food properly if you miss them even for one night. That's how you long for
them.
So what do you do? You get engaged, you get married, you have, you settle down
with this person for more than I think two weeks. THEN suddenly something
changes. Even the sight of this person annoys you, makes you revolted almost. This
happens, I’m sure this has happened to you a lot, almost all of you. What has
happened? NOTHING; perception has changed. Your perception has been altered,
you understand. I'm giving this as an example of the 'Snang Gsum' because Snang
Gsum teaching is basically ‘altering our perception’.
So there is a three perception we talk - the impure perception, the experiential
perception and the pure perception. We can talk about impure perception quite a lot.
Experiential perception, we can talk - half-guess and half sort of talk. Pure
perception, we have to do a wild guess and then talk. So these are the three
perceptions we talk, huh, three perceptions.
Now, let’s go back to the motivation again. As I said, first of all your motivation to
listen to this teaching should be because you want to achieve enlightenment, really.
IF NOT, if your motivation of listening to this teaching is to have a, I don’t know – a
successful buying or selling of a share or a stock market or something – WON’T
HELP. I will tell you honestly. All these; not one word will help you. Better go to a
business conference or somewhere where you know, you better read some other
books.
THIS actually is the opposite, I tell you. THIS tells you how samsara is futile, how
they are meaningless, how they are useless. And then yet you go to a teaching and
ask for, and look for a teaching that will make your business successful. It’s wrong. It
doesn’t work like that. That’s the first motivation, okay

The second is a Mahayana exclusive motivation. We should be listening to this
teaching only for the enlightenment of ourselves individually but also for the sake of
all the sentient beings. That is VERY, VERY IMPORTANT. If you are a Mahayana
practitioner, that’s SO IMPORTANT, especially for the Mahayana practitioners.
THE THREE LEVELS OF PERCEPTION
TEACHING ON THE THREE VISIONS (SNANG GSUM) OF THE
SAKYAPA
(Singapore 2003) by Dzongsar Jamyang Khyentse Rinpoche … 6/48
It’s easy to say than done. Just briefly, if we are Mahayana practitioner, you know
how many Mahayana practitioners including myself? We, firstly we don't practice
much. Secondly even though if we do practice, we are so worried about our practice
and the result of this practice. We don't really care about other people's
enlightenment. A Mahayana practitioner should not really care about the failure or
the success of their spiritual practice.
A Mahayana practitioner must be practising dharma for the sake of others. If a
Mahayana practitioner observes someone else doing spiritually or materially or
worldly better than yourself and if you feel envious or jealous, that means the
bodhicitta is not there. That means you are still more important than the others.
THAT needs to be changed and we have to think we receive these teachings for the
sake of all the sentient beings. That's the second kind of motivation.
The THIRD kind of meditation, I would not stress so much but some of you, I think
are old Lam Dre practitioners, I guess. So for those who are, those who have
received Lam Dre teachings before, it is believed, it is said that when you receive
Lam Dre teachings, Lam Dre, not only complete Lam Dre; even the part of the Lam

Dre teachings such as this – you are supposed to think that the place you are
receiving this teaching such as this building is a cemetery, the person whom you are
receiving teachings from is a heruka.
Yourself is not an ordinary being, but also a bodhisattva or a heruka. And all the
companions are also dakas or dakinis and all that. But I think I will not elaborate on
the third motivation so much because I don’t think it’s necessary. And for those who
are already have this knowledge, please do so. So let’s get back to the Three
Perceptions, okay, three, triple perception.
So the first perception, impure perception – let’s talk about this a little bit and actually
... where’s that pointer? Ah there it is. On that throne I’m sure many of you have
seen this painting of Wheel of Life, “srid pa’I ‘khor lo” we call it, okay. In fact in the
future, if your non-Buddhist friend asks you - What is the definition of life according to
Buddhism? What you should do is to go to a bookshop and buy this painting and
show. This is it. This is a description or definition of life according to Buddhism, okay.
THE THREE LEVELS OF PERCEPTION
TEACHING ON THE THREE VISIONS (SNANG GSUM) OF THE
SAKYAPA
(Singapore 2003) by Dzongsar Jamyang Khyentse Rinpoche … 7/48
Just briefly; in the centre you see a pig, a bird and a snake which represents
Ignorance, passion and aggression - which is the delusion that WE HAVE. Now
these three then perceive. When you have ignorance, passion and aggression, then
everything you see is impure. It's like you're looking at a snow mountain, white snow
mountain but you are wearing a blue, red and orange sunglass okay, on the top of
each other. And then you look at the snow and that snow is not white.

You see a purplish kind of snow, so if you ask whether the snow is purple, of course
not. How come you see it purple? Because you are wearing three layers of sunglass;
that's why all your vision or the perception is altered, manipulated. So to begin with,
we already have three sunglass - snake sunglass, bird sunglass, and what was it,
the other – pig, right. Out of this three, as you see things, you see five realms, five or
six realms. So hell realm, hell, hungry ghost, animal, god, asura, human – these are
the six realms that you experience or you, you perceive.
Let stick with our language here - okay this is a ‘Snang Gsum’ teaching so we use
the same language I guess. So that’s the perception you GET, right; that’s the
perception you end up with.
Right at the outside we see a big monster, clutching, holding the Wheel of Life. This
monster actually represents Time, time. Time is like a monster. It’s changing, time
means change of course. If everything is not changing, that means ‘freeze’. Then
there is no past time, no present time, no future time. And we LIKE time, at the same
time we HATE the time.
It’s a monster; it’s really a monster so that wherever…; okay all these perceptions
are subject to time. All these perceptions are subject to time, meaning our
perceptions are going to change all the time, all the time. Of course some take
longer than the other; but no perception ever lasts forever.
So let’s begin with one perception. It’s really important to know, you know especially
in the Mahayana, especially in the Vajrayana like the Lam Dre, and especially Lam
Dre, because Virupa, the great master or the saint Virupa is a great scholar of the
Yogacharya-Madhyamika. He was strong in propagating the concept that everything
is your own mind.
So hell realm, for instance hell – where is hell? It’s not really underneath this earth as
many religions would say. It’s, it’s not like you dig this earth and you’ll find the hell,
right. So hell can; okay, that’s hell. Hungry ghost – where is hungry ghost? We go to
eat and then you’ll find the hungry ghost realm - No. South, west, north, there is no
externally existing, truly existing hungry ghost realm; same thing with all the rest of
the realms. So what, what are these realms? They are nothing but a perception, six
kinds of perception.

THE THREE LEVELS OF PERCEPTION
TEACHING ON THE THREE VISIONS (SNANG GSUM) OF THE
SAKYAPA
(Singapore 2003) by Dzongsar Jamyang Khyentse Rinpoche … 8/48
So in this case, let's say, let’s say okay myself okay - I’m getting up after a long flight
from Europe, a very... And a sleeping pill maybe and then I get up. The moment I get
up I’m dull, I’m murky, eh, I don’t know where bathroom door is. I’m searching for
you know the light switch. You know the stage when you are dull, so that happens to
me okay. Every morning I’m a bit of an animal basically, so during that time I’m
experiencing or I’m having a perception of animal. I’m nothing but an animal at that
time; REALLY just like a pig, just got up.
Then after I get up, I drag myself to toilet, take shower; shower and shampoo and
the soap and what else; eh, scrub and facial, what do you call it? You know
moisturizer, all of that. NOW, what’s happening? Vanity, you see you have to make
yourself beautiful, right. Oh, I’m becoming fat. Oh, you know, my skin is peeling off,
more wrinkles like this – vanity. You know at the same time you think you are
beautiful, of course. Of course you criticize yourself – Oh, I’m older, I have more
wrinkles, my skin is dry. But at the same time, you love your look. That stupid vanity
comes in the bathroom. I’m talking about myself, by the way, not you, okay
(laughter).
So what I’m saying is after I get up; when I got up, I was becoming animal and then
after the shower, I think I was god, I’m usually god. I’m, I’m experiencing god realm,
you understand. And then comes to the table; breakfast, sunny side up, cappuccino,
you know what do you call it? Chocolat, touton, this eh, croissant, and all that, smells
nice and then you EAT, you know really GREEDILY.

Even though a lot of calories is not good for me, even though I have high cholesterol,
I shouldn’t be eating chocolates. Lots of calories mean I have to later go and what,
do more treadmill, is it? Treadmill you know, run or swim more laps. That doesn’t
matter; when the breakfast is in front of me, sausages, what is it? Eh, ham, you just
HAVE TO EAT, irresistible, DESIRE. At that time, I’m experiencing human realm.
So I’m giving you example within the one day, not only within one day; within one
hour one could go through all these six realms, experiences. The Mahayana and
especially the Vajrayana concept of six realms is not externally. It does exist within
oneself.
THE THREE LEVELS OF PERCEPTION
TEACHING ON THE THREE VISIONS (SNANG GSUM) OF THE
SAKYAPA
(Singapore 2003) by Dzongsar Jamyang Khyentse Rinpoche … 9/48
Jealousy, we have anger, passion and ignorance. You know ignorance, passion and
aggression. These three emotions are kind of; of course, they, they’re not good of
course but within the five emotions you know – ignorance, passion, aggression,
jealousy and pride – if you were to ask me, which out of this five, which is the worst,
right? I, according to my own experience, ignorance, passion and aggression is –
you know I don’t mind them so much.
Because with the passion you get things done, you can read because of the passion.
Aggression also, gets things done. Ignorance is kind of naïve and kind of stupid so
it’s okay. But there’re two ‘loser’ emotions, pride and jealousy; they are such a loser.
You gain nothing out of being jealous or you gain nothing out of being having so
much pride.

Pride, when you have pride, with the pride your perception is different, SO
DIFFERENT; I mean I cannot even finish talking about it. Someone who has so
much pride, because of the pride, you can’t even have a good date, you know
dating, because of the pride. Have you experienced this? Because you’re dating with
this new friend and because of your pride, you don’t to be the one ‘who breaks the
ice first’. You wait until the other person talks, isn’t it?
Pride, because of the pride; you know pride makes you so fragile – more pride you
are, easier to get hurt. And because of the pride, your world is SO LIMITED. Your
perception, your perception of the world has become so limited. You don’t make
friends. You, you make yourself very limited.
Jealousy is another continuous paranoia so much. As we were talking earlier, so
many stories you write because of the jealousy; so much imagination – all of these is
created by jealousy.
So the five emotions – they create five different kinds of perception and these are the
five perceptions that we have to alter, we have to get rid of – IMPURE perception.
Okay, bottom line is this. Impure perception comes because of impure subject.
Impure because of defiled or as I was telling you the example before because you
are wearing a lot of filters. At the moment, let, let, let me put another way.
You must have heard the word ‘yoga’, yoga. Yoga in Tibetan is called ‘naljor’, naljor.
It’s a very interesting word. ‘Nal’ in the Tibetan world, ’nal’ actually means ‘natural’,
natural. “Jor’ is a bit like wealth; so it’s like wealth of being natural, okay - so yogis
are considered those who have this wealth of being natural.
Based on this, if you ask – What is prajna, what is wisdom? What is wisdom in
Buddhism? It is our mind that is in its height of being normal or natural.
COMPLETELY NATURAL MIND is the wisdom – unaltered, unfabricated,
uncontrived, not manipulated, completely LEFT alone. THAT kind of mind is so-
called natural mind and this is what we are trying to achieve.

THE THREE LEVELS OF PERCEPTION
TEACHING ON THE THREE VISIONS (SNANG GSUM) OF THE
SAKYAPA
(Singapore 2003) by Dzongsar Jamyang Khyentse Rinpoche … 10/48
But normality, so-called normality is very difficult to define because what is normal
for some people are not necessary normal for others. What is normal; sublime
beings, saints, and the sublime beings the way, when they look at us – everything
that we see, they think is not normal, not natural. And the reason is when we
perceive things, all our perceptions are filtered, contrived, fabricated through six
kinds of filters or the five kinds of filters – anger, passion, aggression; I mean eh,
aggression, passion, ignorance, jealousy, pride and many, many other emotions.
All our perception is perceived through these kinds of emotions, that’s why,
perceptions, everything what we see is ABNORMAL. Everything what we perceive,
our perception is not right. What we see, what we experience is not what it is.
Maybe just to let me, let us sort of; I want to see whether we are communicating well.
You can ask me some questions if you want. Because there's no point of me talking
two hours and if you don't understand what I'm talking; so I have to know whether
you're, you are getting what I'm trying to tell you. So ask me questions if you have or
I will ask you.
Student A: Rinpoche, what is the difference between perception and conception?
Rinpoche: They are almost same. Perception is more objective and conception is
subjective. (To another student) I can't hear you. Can you...pardon? I'm hearing a lot
of echo. Yeah, that's better, good. Yes, well ... (inaudible question)

Okay right and wrong; okay right and wrong - let’s discuss this a little but because it
is quite important. Right and wrong, mm; last night I was somewhere discussing
about this and I think it's quite important.
In Buddhism, it's really important that you place wisdom above all, okay. Wisdom is
the most important. Like Shantideva said, just beginning of the Ninth Chapter, he
said (Tibetan phrase) - All the other branches of bodhisattva's activities are taught so
that the bodhisattva can apply the wisdom, okay. Wisdom is the most important. And
I tell you this because at times when we talk about a religion, religion yeah; when we
talk about a religion, IMMEDIATELY our human mind talks about ethics.
I've been, I have been asked many times by one; you know sometimes I'm flying in a
plane and they know I'm kind of religious person. So they ask - What are you? Are
you a Muslim or a Buddhist or what? Then I say I'm Buddhist. Then the immediate
question is - So as a Buddhist, you can't eat meat, isn't it? You understand; that’s
how they define a religion. Immediately a religion is eh, measured by what you can
do, what is wrong to do, and what is right to do, and all that. I think it is true with
many other religions but it is not true with Buddhism. In Buddhism, you cannot define
Buddhism because of its ethics, not at all.
THE THREE LEVELS OF PERCEPTION
TEACHING ON THE THREE VISIONS (SNANG GSUM) OF THE
SAKYAPA
(Singapore 2003) by Dzongsar Jamyang Khyentse Rinpoche … 11/48
I will tell you one thing. Why? - Because if you define Buddhism based on ethics,
then Buddhism will contradict itself too much. In the, in the Vinaya Sutra, for
instance, Buddha said whatever is offered, must eat; the monks must, they must eat
this. So meat is offered, they eat meat. In the Mahayana, Buddha said a bodhisattva

should NEVER eat meat (Tibetan phrase) – you, you should, Mahayana should
never eat meat; he, he emphasized that. See it’s a contradiction. There’s many like
that; eh, many, many contradictions like that.
In the Maha, okay in the, in the Vinaya, a person must hold the pratimoksa vow,
pratimoksa vow such as bhikshu or bhikshuni; you know; a vow as you protect your
life you must really, the VOW is the most important. Whereas in the Mahayana, if it is
going to benefit the sentient beings, you can kill, you can lie, you can slander, you
can eh, say bad things. Basically you can do except the three non-virtues, non-
virtuous actions of mind, a bodhisattva can do anything. See it’s a contradiction,
right?
So right and wrong is a very ethical term, ethic. It’s a very ethical and moralistic
oriented question, okay. Now when we talk about Snang Gsum, the pure perception,
the Triple Perception or the Triple Vision, we use words like impure perception
(Tibetan phrase) impure perception. Now this judgement of impure is not moral or
ethical. The impure is nothing to do with because Buddha said this is impure, you
understand.
So now the question is how do we judge what is wrong and what is right, or what is
impure and what is pure? We judge with the object, the manifestation of the object.
Okay we look; we experience something okay; we have a perception, okay. These
perceptions when we experience, first of all it doesn’t last. It is impermanent, it’s
impermanent. Secondly it’s interdependent. Thirdly it has no truly existing nature,
truly existing entity.
So what you see is like a mirage. It has no essence. It, it does not, it does not last;
it’s not a permanent. And THIS is what is defined as impure. It’s not a moral thing;
any other questions?
THE THREE LEVELS OF PERCEPTION

TEACHING ON THE THREE VISIONS (SNANG GSUM) OF THE
SAKYAPA
(Singapore 2003) by Dzongsar Jamyang Khyentse Rinpoche … 12/48
Student B: Rinpoche, eh, in the Mahayana Buddhism, the buddha-nature is
emphasized very much and also in the Verdant. (Rinpoche: Also in…?) Verdant,
Hindu Verdant, the Vedas, Upanishad; it’s spoken about the ‘atman’. Could you
please give us your eh, right perception, pure perception of whether there’s any
difference between the buddha-nature and the atman?
Rinpoche: That’s a very difficult question. I’m a very pro-Hindu by the way. I am a
very pro-Hindu. I think Hindu, Hinduism is one of the greatest philosophies. And I tell
this to many of my colleagues and I believe; I’m not, I’m not just joking. I always say
that if I’m not a Buddhist and if I’m not allowed to be a Buddhist, and if I have to
choose a religion that is not Buddhism but all the other – I would definitely choose
Hinduism.
It is a very, very sophisticated; it has been marked by a lot of political upheaval and
all of that – very sad, very, very sad that happened. Also maybe the Brahmins, you
know, they have destroyed the image of Hindu a lot. Other than that, Hinduism is a
very; it’s, it’s a very profound teaching. And yes, this question has been asked by
myself to many lamas, whether there IS any difference between atman and buddha-
nature.
Very, very difficult to answer this in one way but on the other hand, the Buddhist
fundamental view of emptiness always helps. Buddha-nature is emptiness,
emptiness is buddha-nature. Emptiness is not other than the buddha-nature and
buddha-nature is not other the emptiness. You know, that’s pro-quote Heart Sutra.
So basically buddha-nature is not a phenomena. It’s not a phenomenon. Whereas
atman, the ways the Upanishad talks about atman, it seems to be indicating that it is
a phenomenon. And that maybe is one of the biggest difference between the Hindu
concept of atman and the Buddhist concept of eh, buddha-nature.

I’ll tell you. See buddha-nature is what we call (Tibetan phrase). It’s a result of
elimination. You got it – result of elimination. If you were to ask me how can you
prove that buddha-nature exists? Show me buddha-nature - very difficult, right. But
there’s something I can do. And that is I can prove that defilement is destroyable.
You got it. That ignorance is destroyable; aggression, passion, ignorance, pride,
jealousy – all these are destroyable. They are temporal, temporal? They are
dependent. They are cause. They are condition. With effort we can destroy all of
them. That I can prove easily.
Let’s say you are an angry person, right. Even without using the Buddhist method,
somebody can pat your shoulder, calm down. Calm down; so we know that anger is
not a permanent entity. It is something that can be manipulated; it’s something that
can be destroyed, okay. I can; so I can prove all these negative emotions can be
destroyed absolutely.
So what I’m saying is I can prove the EXISTENCE OF ABSENCE OF IGNORANCE
and THAT proving, that absence of ignorance is PRESENCE OF THE BUDDHA-
NATURE. Other than that, if you want me to show you a buddha-nature with light
glowing from his head, six arms, eight legs – it doesn’t exist. And if it does exist, then
it becomes an entity and then it is very dangerous. Then Buddhist concept of
buddha-nature becomes like a Christian concept of soul.
THE THREE LEVELS OF PERCEPTION
TEACHING ON THE THREE VISIONS (SNANG GSUM) OF THE
SAKYAPA
(Singapore 2003) by Dzongsar Jamyang Khyentse Rinpoche … 13/48

See the Christians talk about saving the soul, isn’t it? Save my soul, save his soul.
You do not save buddha-nature. Buddha-nature itself is a saviour. It’s the Buddha.
Buddha cannot be saved; two different things. Okay if there is no more question, we
will have a break, toilet break.
I’m trying to emphasize the concept of perception because you could read the text
Snang Gsum and I, I have a feeling that many people forget the essential which is
the understanding that Virupa is talking about perceptions. Actually in his vajra eh,
root text he says (Tibetan phrase) - for the beings who are defiled, impure
perception. This says a lot.
I am emphasizing this because many Buddhists, they, the way they practice
Buddhism is like way they practice Christianity, really. They treat Buddha as the
God. They are afraid of him. They think that they will be punished if they are not
behaving well, not necessarily by the Buddha but by something called karma. And
they feel guilty if they eh, happen to forget practicing eh, I don’t know, going visiting
temple. It’s like the Christians, if they forget to go to Sunday morning church, then
they feel they have missed out something, isn’t it?
Many Buddhists, especially now, seems to be practicing Buddhism as how a
Christian would practice Christianity. That’s dangerous, not good; you have to
change that. Buddhism in general, especially here in the path and fruit teaching of
Virupa of Sakya tradition, we are not trying to PLEASE the Buddha. That is never our
aim.
But I can understand why people feel like that because you see we make offerings.
We make offerings of apples. We make offerings of water, food and in some cases
we make offerings of so-called ‘torma’ which is kind of alien for you. It’s a Tibetan
cake actually, like a ritual cake.
But we make offerings; we bathe; like if you go to Thailand we, there is a ceremony
of offering bath to the Buddha. We pour water on the Buddha and all that. We offer
incense and with a good perfume we offer. All of these make you think that – Oh, this
is a lunch time, Buddha must be hungry so we must put some food or it’s about a
week now, Buddha needs a bath. Buddha must be dirty.

This kind of theistic approach is not a Buddhist way to practice Buddhism. In
Buddhism, especially in the Sakyapa tradition, the root of practice of the dharma is
changing the perception. Really it is so important. This is what Snang Gsum is about
– changing the perception. And changing the perception is REALLY, REALLY
IMPORTANT. Perception is ruling us all the time. In our every day-to-day life, it rules
our life and we have always - all our perception is mistaken perception.
THE THREE LEVELS OF PERCEPTION
TEACHING ON THE THREE VISIONS (SNANG GSUM) OF THE
SAKYAPA
(Singapore 2003) by Dzongsar Jamyang Khyentse Rinpoche … 14/48
As you know, last night we talk about and I can give you this example again. Like for
instance, like we look at our hand, yeah we look at our hand. And every time we look
at our hand and we talk about and think about our hand – we have three mistaken
perceptions.
The first – we think this hand is the same hand that I had yesterday, isn’t it, the same
hand. That’s a mistake. That means that you are saying the hand is permanent.
Yesterday’s hand and today’s hand is same. That’s what we think. You got it? That’s
a big mistake. That’s not true.
Yesterday’s hand is gone, today’s hand is new. And after, in about twenty years your
hand is going to even look different - have more wrinkles, less hair or more hair, I
don’t know. It has to change. If the same, if we have the same hand, then imagine
when you are fifty you still have a baby’s hand. It wouldn’t even look nice. Every time
the hand is changing, changing, changing but we don’t see that. We think it is the
same hand. That’s one mistaken perception.

Another mistaken perception is we think when we look at our hand, we look at
(Tibetan phrase) - we call it. We look at as a whole. We don’t see it as in parts. We
don’t see it as skin, blood, vein, yeah. When we say – let me shake your hand – we
never say ‘Can I shake your bones and eh, skin and your hair’. We don’t, we don’t
say like that.
So we have created this perception called ‘a hand’. Then some people are so proud
that they have shaken hands with George Bush or Osama bin Laden or whatever,
you understand. Hand also has many different kinds of hand, you know. This is a
very ordinary hand, you know like pathetic, you know sort of ordinary hand. But
Osama bin Laden’s hand – Oh, that’s very special. Dalai Lama’s hand, Mother
Teresa’s hand, celebrity Brad Pitt’s hand – Wow, that’s even better, isn’t it? Brad
Pitt’s hand is the best. And maybe Christian Zeta-Jones what, Catherine Zeta-Jones,
ah, that’s the best.
So we have, we have this kind of misconception, eh, misinterpretation,
misperception; that’s a perception. Another problem we make is we; we forget that
the hand is dependent nature. The very movement of the hand, the existence of the
hand, and the liveliness of the hand – all depend on food, elements, SO MANY,
MANY different factors this we keep on forgetting. So this is how we perceive things
all the time, always, always making; I’m, I’m only using the hand as example.
Use it in all our matters, relationship. Okay you have a boyfriend, you have a
girlfriend. When you look at your boyfriend, you make three mistakes again. You
think this is the same boyfriend as what you had yesterday. And it will be same as
today tomorrow, but it is not. Tomorrow he is quite irritating, today he is quite loving,
isn’t it? Or day after tomorrow divorced, stuff like this happens because you think it’s
the same.
THE THREE LEVELS OF PERCEPTION

TEACHING ON THE THREE VISIONS (SNANG GSUM) OF THE
SAKYAPA
(Singapore 2003) by Dzongsar Jamyang Khyentse Rinpoche … 15/48
And then when we look at our girlfriend or the boyfriend, we also look at as, look at
them as an abstract ‘boyfriend, my boyfriend, my girlfriend’; an abstract picture. It’s
almost like Picasso or you know like Mondrian picture, you know, it’s an abstract
idea so-called ‘boyfriend’. Because if you really, really you know separate each part
of your boyfriend, there are things that you might not really like, for instance like his
armpit’s smell (laughter). For instance like the way he snores, I don’t know; the way
he eats too much garlic or the way he is so obsessed with eh, I don’t know anchovy
pizza, things like that. There are so many things that you don’t like but usually when
you first meet this boyfriend, we ignore all that.
We focus on one thing. Because you like his nose, that’s why you have fallen deadly
in love, right; because you’ve fallen in love with his nose, his finger, whatever doesn’t
matter. After two years you begin to realize all these mistakes one by one, because
then you are beginning to take them apart. The anchovy, the armpit smell, I don’t
know, all kinds of things that you know. What I’m saying is perception is a big thing in
our life. The Snang Gsum teaches that; although my examples you might think it’s
something eh, new but I am really not, I’m trying not to, you know go away from the
actual original teaching of Snang Gsum.
Snang Gsum is teaching that. Snang Gsum is telling us that when we have
defilement, we have impure perceptions. Impure perceptions – meaning everything
is permanent, everything is one, everything is solid, everything is unchangeable and
all kinds of. And we can go on and on talk about this impure perception, so much of
it; so much hope, so much fear, not only on the ordinary, you know ordinary eh, what
do you call it? – Mundane worldly life.
Even in the spiritual world, if you are not careful, impure perception can arise. This is
why I was telling you right from the beginning – what is our motivation here? What is
our motivation? Is it really to achieve enlightenment? If it is then everything is,
everything will become easier. Things are less complicated. But it is not; for instance
like you know just now during the break, many people were asking me about

questions such as the relationship between guru and the student. That’s another big
subject.
And many of the guru-student relationship does not work or falls apart because first
coming with the wrong motivation. Secondly, well wrong motivation is an impure
perception already. And while you’re having relationship with the guru, because of
the impure motivation, all the perceptions are also impure.
THE THREE LEVELS OF PERCEPTION
TEACHING ON THE THREE VISIONS (SNANG GSUM) OF THE
SAKYAPA
(Singapore 2003) by Dzongsar Jamyang Khyentse Rinpoche … 16/48
I’ll elaborate this okay. You go to a guru okay. You go to a guru okay, and your
motivation is not for enlightenment. But your motivation is eh, to be near the guru,
you understand, to be near the guru. I, I want to stress this a little bit because I don’t
know somehow watching many of the Kung fu films, you know Kung fu, the Chinese
Kung fu films, and also the Chinese histories; I mean this is not a problem with the
Chinese society alone. Tibetans have the same problem. Indians, I don’t know. I
think they have the same problem.
But because right now we’re, I mean the Chinese society – let’s talk about this. It
seems to be a big problem, you know. What do you call it? They call it what the ‘Big
Brother’, ‘Da, da er ge’ or something, is it? You know when one Kung fu master dies;
he has to have a successor, isn’t it? The lineage holder (laughter), isn’t it, lineage
holder? And many of the Kung fu films are about two students fighting about who
becomes the lineage holder, isn’t it, yeah?

Not only in the Kung fu films but you read in the like eh; even what’s his name?
Master Hui-Neng, Hui-Neng isn’t it? Hwei-Ning, Sixth, Sixth Patriarch, Hui-Neng – he
had a tough time because some of the students didn’t want him to be the Sixth
Patriarch; didn’t want him to have the begging bowl and the robe. There was a lot of
tough time. So what I’m saying is some disciples, some students, some people come
not for enlightenment, but to become the ‘Da er ge’, you understand the ‘Big
Brother’, the lineage holder or they want to become all. There are so many stories
like that.
People come so that they can take photograph with the Rinpoche; or the highest
lama is the best. And later they can show it to a lower student – ‘See I’m someone
special (laughter), you know. You better do; you better do what I say. You
understand I’m kind of special’. There’re so many, I have noticed this. And these are
all what I call impure perception because in Buddhism, REALLY the sole, sole
purpose of practising the buddhadharma is to achieve enlightenment.
WHO CARES ABOUT lineage holder or to become the second in command? You
know, anyway you should not be aiming for the second in command. You should be
aiming for the first in command, which is the enlightenment. That should be the real
purpose but this is easier to say than practised. Many people, many disciples, many,
many disciples – because their motivation is to be close to their guru – sometimes if
the guru ignores them for about half a day, they go through a depression for about
six months (laughter).
Depression; they eat Prozac, they eat Prozac, is it Prozac? Yeah, and SO MUCH
PAIN, so much and then if another student also becomes slightly favoured, favourite
boy of the guru, then your situation becomes very insecure. Oh, oh, I have a comp,
competitor; I have, you know competition, you understand. All these stem from a
wrong motivation. Your motivation is not for enlightenment. Your motivation is to be
recognized; to be the recognized person, and that’s why we have pain. Why we call
impure perception is because it brings you pain. It really brings so much pain.
THE THREE LEVELS OF PERCEPTION

TEACHING ON THE THREE VISIONS (SNANG GSUM) OF THE
SAKYAPA
(Singapore 2003) by Dzongsar Jamyang Khyentse Rinpoche … 17/48
Look at everything. Look at, let’s go back to our hand, yeah. We have six kinds,
three kind’s misperception about our hand, isn’t it, because you know wrong ideas
about our hand? So, so many more moisturizer you can buy, so many and none of
them work, none of them. They work for like five minutes but it doesn’t matter.
Even though like I’m forty-three, and for forty-three years one moisturizer, not one
moisturizer HAD WORKED sort of ultimately (laughter). It doesn’t matter. If I walk on
the street and if I see a moisturizer advertisement, I will fall for it, of course. I will
think this moisturizer, I don’t know Yves Saint Laurent or whatever, Chanel or Body
Shop or whatever; if they say – This is the best, extracted from the mountain water,
extracted from such and such herbs, good for face and that – I will just fall for it, buy
it, apply it. Of course, works for like a day or two and then back to square one. And
that again you have reached to the pain, all stemming from the wrong perception.
We don’t, we don’t really have to you know think six realms in terms of existing
somewhere outside, where you will go in the future if you are not careful. We don’t
have to think like that. We should think about all these realms – hell realm, hungry
ghost, animal – exist within this, within this world.
I mean even externally speaking look at our world. Look at; I always think that
America, if you just watch CNN, maybe not the European edition, the American, you
know the American edition. Like the Fox; do you say Fox, Fox Channel, Fox News?
You should watch Fox News and you will see it’s a god realm because the
Americans don’t know the other countries exist even. They think they, they have
everything and then everything, everybody must act, you know what they say, and
when someone is not obedient to them, they think – How can this is possible? It’s
like sacrilegious almost. This is how they think. I think the Americans are a bit like
god realm; really so much pride, so much ignorance and pride, LOT OF PRIDE.

And big highways, so big cars – so it’s a god realm you know but consuming. They
consume probably more than half of what is world-producing just to feed like ten
percent, not even ten, maybe two percent of the world’s population. The war is
waged, innocent people are being killed, all of that. Pride, you know there’s so much
this pride – We are the best. Our democracy system is the best. Everybody must go
through this, I think.
THE THREE LEVELS OF PERCEPTION
TEACHING ON THE THREE VISIONS (SNANG GSUM) OF THE
SAKYAPA
(Singapore 2003) by Dzongsar Jamyang Khyentse Rinpoche … 18/48
And then when you go to places like Ethiopia or South Africa. I’ve been there
recently. And it is amazing because the food aid they receive from the World Food
Fund and all the Red Cross is ENORMOUS. But there are just thousands and
thousands especially kids dying of starvation. And the reason is just ridiculous -
nobody to transport the food from the food centre to the location.
I thought this has to be hungry ghost realm because in the hungry ghost description,
if you read Snang Gsum (Tibetan phrase), you know all this - some of the hungry
ghost beings, even though they have food, they can’t eat. Even though they can just,
it’s like within, you know hand’s reaching distance, you still can’t use it. It’s like that.
They can’t use it; SO suffering with starvation because of the past, anyway; anyway
that kind of perception.
And then if you want to see asura realm, you don’t have to go anyway; just go to
Middle East – Palestinians and Israelis have been fighting from the day one. They
have been fighting for all kinds of things. Jealousy, all they do is fight and fight and
fight. It’s almost not the news anymore, you understand. Like this is how our human
mind is. It’s like we are immune to it. Okay, six, six people died in a suicide bomb

today in Jerusalem. And we are drinking coke, sipping cappuccino, okay; it’s not
even sinking in our head because it has been done so much. I think that’s asura
realm, you know; even in this earth, you can see that.
And there, somewhere there, I think we will also find hell realm where people suffer; I
mean our children here, they are so lucky. In Afghanistan, in some of these places,
boys and girls at the age of seven and eight, they carry gun. They are shorter than
the gun. They carry gun and go and fight. So lucky; maybe Singapore is a bit of god
realm, I think, not realizing that they’re lucky, you understand, a bit of a god realm -
mixture, mixture of god realm, human realm and animal realm exists everywhere I
think.
Basically all we consumer society, all of us, all of us consumer society – why do we
consume? Why do, why do we love McDonald’s, why do we like McDonald’s? Not
so many reasons; actually I can a hundred reasons why we shouldn’t like
McDonald’s. Junk food is bad food, it’s really bad for health, all of that. BUT
McDonald’s is doing so well. They are doing so well, and do you know why? - All
because we have fallen into the trap of advertising.
This shows we are so ignorant, just like an animal. A hungry donkey – all it needs is
a radish in front of it, carrot; and then all the time when we are looking at Guess
Jeans, what else - Banana Republic, Gap Jeans or I don’t know, Giordano, is it?
Giordano, cheap $99 point what, $15.99 dollars reduction sale, clearance sale, what
else? Christmas, oh yes, of course Christmas is coming soon. Even, even the holy
sort of concepts such as Christmas, I mean it’s a very holy concept. You know it’s a
very special occasion. But even that is turned into a consumer’s benefit.
Very soon we are going to have a Vesak Day shopping, I tell you (laughter). There’s
not many Buddhists right now, otherwise – Oh, Vesak Sale, you understand; Vesak,
Vesak cake, Vesak; well the tree’s already gone with the Christians. I don’t know
Vesak water or something like that. So everybody’s buying bucket of water to put in;
all this because we buy for it.

THE THREE LEVELS OF PERCEPTION
TEACHING ON THE THREE VISIONS (SNANG GSUM) OF THE
SAKYAPA
(Singapore 2003) by Dzongsar Jamyang Khyentse Rinpoche … 19/48
I really think in a way all of us, if you think we’re, we are, of course we all have our
own suffering; of course we have, I mean this is a human realm. We have birth, old
age, sickness, death. What we don’t want, we have. What we want, we don’t have.
All kinds of problems; of course we do have but some of us we’re actually quite
OKAY. We’re actually doing fine.
Just the other night, I was talking, for instance like looking at myself. If I, if I live in
this world eighty years, okay eighty years - that’s asking quite a lot. That’s asking a
lot. That’s expecting a lot. That’s, that’s, there’s a hope, there’s a big hope. If I’m
living eighty years in this world, you‘re asking a lot because everything is so
dangerous – traffic, pollution, so many cause and conditions to kill me, destroy me
and yet I’m asking to live eighty years.
It’s too much asking but anyway let’s say eighty years; then half of my life is gone;
more than half is gone. Now I only have forty years left, huh; thirty-nine okay, thirty–
nine years left. In this thirty-nine years, what do I really need?
Okay, calculate; maybe I don’t need more than ten jeans. I don’t need more than
sixty T-shirts, maybe two wrist watches, eh, eh, maybe about two hundred tooth-
paste tubes, about a hundred toothbrushes. We can budget like this, you now. If you
budget out like that, I think our life is not that expensive, economical at the same
time kind of comfortable. But we don’t think like this.
For instance, when I go to shopping I will shop as if I’m going to live one thousand
years (laughter). So ten jeans is not enough, one hundred jeans; you know some,
some of the closets we have – how many jackets do you have? About forty jackets;
most of the time you don’t even wear it. It’s a waste; might just, might as well go for a
good trip, trip to, I don’t know, Morocco or Ulan Bator or somewhere exotic and see
something new and eat something new; instead of spending on this kind of

consumer things again and again which will satisfy you only for one afternoon and
tomorrow you will be looking for a different fashion and you will want that.
See becoming a victim of a consumer society is the very reason why I think we are
all animals; really like a donkey with a radish in front. We are all like that. We’re all
do whatever the advertisement says.
THE THREE LEVELS OF PERCEPTION
TEACHING ON THE THREE VISIONS (SNANG GSUM) OF THE
SAKYAPA
(Singapore 2003) by Dzongsar Jamyang Khyentse Rinpoche … 20/48
Okay insurance – goodness this. Do you have insurance, insurance? NOTHING,
NOTHING WHATSOEVER can insure you. Okay, that’s the bottom line. There is NO
INSURANCE that can insure you completely. You will have to die. And when you
die, you will not even see how your belongings have been enjoyed by others; you will
not even see it. We, we, you know we human beings we really, we are so ignorant,
especially the Confucius society like us. We are really ignorant. We’re, we are in love
with the family, name, honour, all of that.
What do you call this, you know the Chinese family ancestor’s name on the shrine
and they prostrate? Yeah, name; it’s the name of the family, isn’t it? – The ancestors’
right; and who knows, who knows maybe you are one of the reincarnation of these
ancestors. You are prostrating to yourself (laughter), you understand but we have
this kind of illusion in honour of our ancestors, in honour of our family, in honour of all
kinds.

You know people commit suicide; people you know like the Japanese – they have a
GREAT TRADITION, amazing, artistic, aesthetically, beautiful tradition of how to kill
themselves (laughter). It’s amazing you know because I like watching films. The, the
whole film based on hara-kiri, you know satori; these films are amazing, so beautiful.
I believe they do it like that because they are stuck with this so-called honour. All this
proves that we are animal. We are everything; we are hell realm, hell, hungry ghost,
animal at times. When you go to California, bit of a god realm. When we walk along
Orchard Road, we’re bit of god realm, I think.
So basically this is a perception. Nothing, all this is our perception and these
perceptions come from what? – Insatiable desire, unstoppable aggression, deep
ignorance, completely jaded pride, paranoid jealousy. Every time we look at things,
that’s what, that’s what it is.
See it’s because of this in Buddhism meditation is introduced because when you
meditate, you know like in the Zen tradition, ‘zazen”; I don’t know whether Singapore
has Zen centres. I think the Zen is so good. I’m very inspired by the Zen method. I
think it’s really good for the modern people, especially the concept, the method
‘zazen’. You don’t do anything. You just go to the Zen temple and sit. All they tell you
to do is sit. You sit, sit, sit, sit, sit – nine hours, six hours, three hours; you just sit
facing a wall. You just sit; wonderful idea – because when you sit, at least this door
of perception you know is closed. Then you are at last looking inside.
THE THREE LEVELS OF PERCEPTION
TEACHING ON THE THREE VISIONS (SNANG GSUM) OF THE
SAKYAPA
(Singapore 2003) by Dzongsar Jamyang Khyentse Rinpoche … 21/48

Otherwise try this today when you go home. Sit on your sofa in your living room for
two minutes doing nothing. You can’t. You’ll not be able to sit two minutes doing
nothing. You see you’ll be looking for remote control to switch on the television. You
will be looking for some novel or a newspaper to read. And you will do all of that; and
EVEN they become boring. You switch on the TV and five hundred channels you flip
through, you understand. You can basically chant and count your mantras based on
the channels these days (laughter) and what else? And then you read and that
doesn’t satisfy you. What, what do you do next?
Call a friend, arrange a party, and the normal party with like bit of eh, what do you
call it? – Mooncake, all of this becomes a little boring so it has to be slightly kinky
party, isn’t it? Little bit of beer, alcohol and then that doesn’t satisfy you, then it has
to be even more kinky like LSD, I don’t know - cocaine or at least marijuana. And I
have been to the world where even that is not even satisfying. I have been to the
world where; I don’t know whether in Singapore this exists. They use chains and
whips and handcuffs (laughter). Our mind has reached to that level of you know.
We can’t, we can‘t sit still and be alone even for a few seconds. Why? Too boring,
really boring; we have to do something. Entertainment is what we need. We want so
much entertainment. One entertainment is not enough. That's why there's five
hundred channels – more entertainment the better. But more entertainment means
more BOREDOM. Because you are now limiting yourself; you are now trying
everything out. And then slowly, slowly you begin to lose the reference and then you
begin to develop a certain depression. You really get so depressed. I mean – have
you ever think like this?
You know those who are like my age – FORTY YEARS, EVERY DAY, breakfast,
lunch, dinner, meet friends, fight with friends, don’t talk with them for a month, again
reconcile – same thing has happened again and again and again. And we still hope
that life is elsewhere. All, all of us, we think we are still yet to settle down
somewhere. We’re not talking about migrating to New Zealand okay. We’re talking
about the real life hasn’t begun yet. Everybody isn't it? All of us, including me; we are
preparing to live; we are preparing to settle somewhere. This is the kind of mentality
we have developed.
So that’s it, that’s impure perception. I, I try to do it slightly, using our modern day,
day to day life examples. If, if you read the classic text, ‘The Triple Vision’, you might
not find some of these examples but don’t think that what I have taught and the text
is different. I’m using just some examples. Basically what you need to know is that

we have impure perception all the time and what do we do? We have to apply
experiential perception and that we will talk tomorrow.
THE THREE LEVELS OF PERCEPTION
TEACHING ON THE THREE VISIONS (SNANG GSUM) OF THE
SAKYAPA
(Singapore 2003) by Dzongsar Jamyang Khyentse Rinpoche … 22/48
You can ask some questions now okay. Wait, wait one question already. Eh, can,
can I answer this first? Where does the ignorance comes from? That's the first
question. When we talk about first ignorance first comes from, you're talking about
evolution, isn't? You are now asking a genesis, question of genesis. In the beginning
the God created hamburger (laughter), you know that kind of thing. Isn’t that what
you are talking? Yeah; well the genesis is one subject that if you want to know more,
should read Nagarjuna or Chandrakirti. They don’t believe in genesis.
There is no such thing as ‘in the beginning’. Therefore ignorance, if you are asking
the first ignorance, there is no such thing. Ignorance is again a relative entity. Did I
answer your question? Okay. Enlightenment, basically you want to know what is
enlightenment. As I said enlightenment is an absence of paranoia; okay I will tell you.
Okay, we have so many obsessions, yeah obsessions, certain impulse obsessions
too. You understand - obsessions. Obsessions coming from our own habitual
tendency that is coming from past lives or obsessions taught by our mother, father,
grandparents or obsession that is taught by the great Confucius master. Obsession
that is coming from our culture, all of these; and these obsessions really bind you,
make your life limited. I give one example.

Okay maybe you are the very right, very person, I don’t know - think I’m giving you
example. You know sometimes when we go to bed; some people have this
obsession that they have to put their shoes in order right next to the bed. You know
not, not eh, really right in order, facing the door, not to the bed. They go to sleep.
They wonder – ‘Did I put my shoes right?’ You know, maybe not. You check; you
look at the shoes. Yeah, it’s facing, facing the door. It’s not upside down and then
you sleep. Half an hour – ‘was that my dream or did I really put it?’ You get up and
check.
I’m, I’m just giving you a very extreme example but if you think all our life is a bit like
that. Our life; there is so much obsession like parents’ obsession that the kid must
study this, this, this. Eh, husband’s obsession that wife must do this and that. Wife’s
obsession of husband must do this and that, you understand? We have certain rules
we make and expect the other people to perform. That’s what we call obsession.
As you practice the dharma, you practice and practice and practice; one day you
KICK OUT your right foot with the shoes. The shoes land maybe on the shrine, on
top of the shrine, I don’t know. Left shoe goes right through the bathroom and sink
into the ‘what do you call it’– toilet. You still sleep; nothing, you DON’T CARE A BIT
where it went. That’s enlightenment (laughter and applause).
THE THREE LEVELS OF PERCEPTION
TEACHING ON THE THREE VISIONS (SNANG GSUM) OF THE
SAKYAPA
(Singapore 2003) by Dzongsar Jamyang Khyentse Rinpoche … 23/48
You still sleep; nothing, you DON’T CARE A BIT where it went. That’s enlightenment
(laughter and applause) - No more obsessions, no more clinging, couldn’t - there’s a
short form of that. You know in America, we call it ‘CCL’, ‘Couldn’t Care Less’

(laughter). Yeah, you have reached that level. CCL is the American version of
enlightenment, couldn’t care less. But this is, this, this; but then again, it is
accompanied with compassion though. Not only you have CCL, you actually want
other people to have CCL. Yeah, that’s important.
Yes, yes, yes, all same. Vajrayana vow; vajrayana is a path; path you know path.
And the path, Maitreya, Maitreya said (Tibetan phrase) – a path has to be
abandoned. Path is like a boat. You go to the other shore, use the boat; you reach
the other shore – what do you do? You abandon the boat. You don’t stand on the
boat because boat looks beautiful, because otherwise you are not on the other
shore.
Yes the boat looks beautiful, boat is so smooth, boat is so and you have the best
time with this boat. But your aim is to reach the other shore. Likewise when, when
you reach the Buddhahood, all, not only the Vajrayana, all the other yanas are gone,
has to be, okay.
Oh, karma is a perception, it is. That’s a good question. Karma is basically cause,
condition and effect; and all of that is a perception. When; perception happens when
there’s a mind perceiving it, okay.
Student A: Rinpoche, I want to ask you eh, in Buddhism there’s this contemplation
of Four Thoughts, so can you explain like how do we contemplate on the Four…
Rinpoche: Four Immeasurable Thoughts?
Student A: No, four thoughts like impermanence, precious human birth…
Rinpoche: Oh, goodness, I forgot. Somebody has to remind me this one. Yes,
impermanence – you think that everything is impermanent.
Student A: I mean like what do you mean ‘to contemplate’? Do you mean sit there
and keep thinking, thinking? It is like don’t know how to do it.

Rinpoche: Okay, okay; you can do many ways. You can do sitting. And contemplate
– it’s more liked analytical. You, you sit and watch a thought, okay. And in your
thought comes a beach, a beautiful beach, you understand; and you just watch that
beach. And then because of that beach, it reminds you California, because twenty
years ago you’ve been to California and you saw a beach, okay. Then your mind is
now in California.
And then because it is in California, now you are thinking about Hollywood. And then
you think about some actors, you understand. So within one sitting, your mind travels
from one continent to another continent, one life to another life, you understand. This
alone proves that mind is changing all the time. Yeah, that’s one way.
You breathe out, you breathe in. When you are breathing in, you are a step closer to
the death. You are step closer to decay. You are step closer to old age, stuff like
that. BUT I have to tell you something. Impermanence is not necessarily something
like bad news. I think this is what many people think – the Buddhist meditation on
impermanence is always something pessimistic. It’s not true.
Do you have a Ferrari? Ferrari, you don’t? You might have it tomorrow, all because
of its impermanence (laughter), you understand. See today you don’t have a Ferrari,
you understand. And usually people not knowing the essence of impermanence,
they think – Oh, I have no Ferrari. How pathetic I am. They feel sorry for themselves.
But some who knows a little about impermanence, they think – Well we never know.
I might end up with six Ferraris tomorrow (laughter). And this could happen. So
impermanence is also very good news, really good news. It’s just the reality; it’s a
fact, fact of life. It changes all the time. That is if you only want Ferrari, yeah.
THE THREE LEVELS OF PERCEPTION

TEACHING ON THE THREE VISIONS (SNANG GSUM) OF THE
SAKYAPA
(Singapore 2003) by Dzongsar Jamyang Khyentse Rinpoche … 24/48
I forgot an example of the perception. Perception is also like an idea, idea, idea
okay. You read Motor magazine and this magazine; it says Rolls-Royce is good car.
Now you have an idea that Rolls-Royce is good, the best. Now the Rolls-Royce
perception is embedded in your life. You work for Rolls-Royce. You work so hard,
spending every saving to buy a Rolls-Royce; maybe even managed to buy one. And
when you drive Rolls-Royce, constant paranoia that it might get bumped, scratched;
and by the time you have finished buying a Rolls-Royce, there's a new model, a
sharper, sleeker, faster Rolls-Royce. This is how perception works.
You can read Cosmopolitan magazine huh, and then it says 2004 - How a leg should
look like. You know legs, legs, yeah, shape of the legs. Then goodness, millions
while in Africa they have nothing to eat, the millions and millions of others eat less so
that they have this leg (laughter). And plastic surgery, all of this, all because of a
perception; not because of Cosmopolitan magazine - yeah it's all a perception.
It changes; I mean during what, what is it? Tang Dynasty, is it? I think a fat, sort of
plump is considered beautiful. And I don't know which dynasty, a small feet - I heard
that the woman try so hard to make their feet so small, so that the man likes it, right?
It's the same thing; still it's the same thing.
You know we may laugh at those you know ancient times, uncivilized, do you
understand? Those were the days that unenlightened, uneducated, uncivilized but
it's not true. Same thing; during the Tang Dynasty, maybe the women are binding
their feet so that their feet look small. Nowadays millions of people are starving
because they want to reach a published hip or leg (laughter). It's always like that; so
ruled by perception - that's what we need to change.
Virupa, the great saint Virupa; he's so up to date. This is, this is, this is a teaching,
not taught only during the Nalanda's days, you understand. This is a teaching taught

for NOW, year 2004 it works, 2010 it will work, 3004 it will work. Any more
questions?
THE THREE LEVELS OF PERCEPTION
TEACHING ON THE THREE VISIONS (SNANG GSUM) OF THE
SAKYAPA
(Singapore 2003) by Dzongsar Jamyang Khyentse Rinpoche … 25/48
Student B: (A lot of background noise making the question garbled and difficult to hear and understand.) Rinpoche: Uh, I think eh, yes depends with the strength of the motivation. If you begin your practice, even making offerings with the refuge and bodhicitta – usually all the deeds should be very powerful. That’s why there’s always a refuge and bodhicitta right at the beginning. You know you take refuge and then you say – I will do such and such so that it will benefit this and that. And then to make it even better, at the end you dedicate the merit; so that should take care of your merit. Student C: Eh, Rinpoche, I got three more questions to ask. Eh, first is if we get empowerment, is it all the three, three Yana vows, we get all of them. And then the second question is eh… Rinpoche: Three Yana vows when we receive the initiation? (Student C: Yes) Yes, most of the time, every time we receive initiation, abhisheka, you always have to have refuge definitely. Okay you have to have refuge and bodhicitta also. Without the refuge and bodhicitta, there is no ground for abhisheka. And then you receive the Tantric vow but it depends. If you are receiving the Kriya Tantra, you don’t receive the full eh, like the Buddha family vows. Sometimes you only receive like eh, Ratna family or Vajra family only. But let’s say you’re receiving like Hevajra abhisheka, then you receive everything, the whole Buddha family. Student C: Then that means for lay followers, the five precepts also received. (Rinpoche: Yes) And the bodhisattva vows, those are eighteen root...

Rinpoche: Yes but I don’t know. I think but you see when you are the receiver of the three vows, you have to emphasize the Vajrayana vow as the main one, and then the Mahayana and then the Pratimoksha. You got it? Yeah. Student C: Then do we like go for separate ceremonies to get five precepts, the lay five precepts? Rinpoche: You, you can; you can. Student C: That means that when we get empowerment, the main focus is on the Tantric vows? Rinpoche: Yes, the main focus is on the Tantric vow. Student C: But if we break the, the eight precepts, the Pratimoksha, it’s the same; the result will the same as we break… Rinpoche: If you break the Pratimoksha vow as a Vajrayana practitioner, that does not necessarily mean you’re breaking the Mahayana, bodhisattva vow and the eh, Tantric vow BUT having said that, it’s almost no independent Pratimoksha vow once you are a Tantric practitioner. There’s almost none. What are you talking about? Give me an example. Student C: Okay, for example eh, we get eh, like in Sakya there is a Vairochana initiation? So last time when His Holiness Sakya Trizin gave, he said there are five precepts; so in five precepts eh… Rinpoche: Maybe you can, you should put it this way. Okay, let’s say you have become a monk, okay. You took in the full ordination. And if you are quite serious about it, then as a bhikshu, you should not be eating from the midday onwards, right? Okay, now you have taken a Tantric abhisheka. In the Tantric abhisheka you have taken the Mahayana and the Tantric vows. So one day, somebody comes and says – Please have some dinner. This will make two hundred people happy. Two hundred people are going to listen to you and they will take bodhisattva vow from you. They will engage themselves into the holy path of the dharma. Now what will you do? Should you stick with the Pratimoksha vow and refuse the dinner? Right, so that time you override the Mahayana vow, I mean you override the Pratimoksha vow by the Mahayana vow. That’s how you do it, okay.
THE THREE LEVELS OF PERCEPTION
TEACHING ON THE THREE VISIONS (SNANG GSUM) OF THE
SAKYAPA

(Singapore 2003) by Dzongsar Jamyang Khyentse Rinpoche … 26/48
Rinpoche: And similarly; its, it’s this the, my answer to your question? Student C: Eh, partially but that’s a very good circumstance where you can benefit others. But say, let’s say I get all the three vows, I get an initiation, I get all the three vows. And then I go and steal or I kill some human being; so I think I broke the Pratimoksha vow, right in this case? Rinpoche: Let’s say you do what? Student C: Let’s say I steal or I kill a human being. (Rinpoche: Yes) Then I’ll break the Pratimoksha vow, right? Rinpoche: Pratimoksha vow, yes. Yes, okay when you steal; okay we have to define this. Okay, you kill a person out of your own desire, anger and ignorance, okay of course, definitely. But like a bodhisattva, if you are supposed to kill this person so that you will, you are stopping him, the victim, to engage into such a hideous bad karma – yes, you still break the Pratimoksha vow, you break the Pratimoksha vow but you gain the merit. So these three vows, you have to study something called Triple, eh Snang Gsum, that’s something where it’s taught, okay. Did you want to ask some questions? Okay working with the perception… Student D: (not audible) Rinpoche: Rather than? An event… (Student D: inaudible) Yes, yeah, yes but you see Siddhartha managed to overcome all the obsessions, that’s why it became an event. (Student D: inaudible) Enlightenment with a choice? Oh, yes of course but we don’t choose, do we? That’s the whole thing, that’s what we call practice of the dharma, trying to make a choice. Mm, how to make a choice? – Oh, everything; meditate, hear, contemplate, all of that. It’s all, all this so-called dharma practice is how to choose, basically art of choosing, of course but that’s difficult because there’s so much temptation. It’s like you know smoking is bad. You have heard the doctor said cancer, that, this but the moment you look at the slim, white, what do you call it? Cigarette and the lighter, and the whole procedure of smoking, holding it in between two fingers – all this is tempting, very tempting. Student D: Say eh, all those, those write-ups about impure perception, out of them then why are certain places so much detail, detail offer bad…what are we accusing them? Are we accusing ourselves …? Rinpoche: Yes, well the rituals are like eh; they are also perception really. It’s like if you have a thorn inside your palm, you need another thorn to take it out. So ghosts; okay now before answering this question, I have to clarify something. You said if ghosts and what? Demons are just a perception - you said that. Now that ‘just’ word,

‘just’ is something that I have to clarify. Because when you say it’s just a perception, then you are devaluing the perception. You think – Oh, it’s just a perception, right, it’s just a perception. Yeah, but I have to correct you because first of all, there is no OTHER THAN A PERCEPTION. You know when you say - ‘it’s just a perception’, then you are indicating okay this is just a perception but this is real. But in Buddhism, EVERYTHING IS A PERCEPTION, okay – one. Second; when you say – ‘it’s just a perception’, as I was saying you seem to be sort of putting down perception as if it is not that important, it’s not that powerful. Now this, you are wrong. Perceptions are VERY powerful. Remember the legs, Rolls-Royce? They are all perception. They are as; in fact they are worse than the ghosts (laughter), you understand. At least the ghosts, Tibetan lamas can chase (laughter and applause) but the legs – oh really difficult (laughter), very difficult, very difficult.
THE THREE LEVELS OF PERCEPTION
TEACHING ON THE THREE VISIONS (SNANG GSUM) OF THE
SAKYAPA
(Singapore 2003) by Dzongsar Jamyang Khyentse Rinpoche … 27/48
But as Buddha said; okay this might shock you, shock many of you. I think
Buddhism; the whole dharma practice is a placebo. You know placebo? Placebo,
you know placebo, yeah; placebo is a pill, it’s a fake, its, it’s not a medicine.
Sometimes you give it to someone, saying that this will work. And they eat and they
think it works. The whole Buddhism is that and Buddha said so. It’s not as if I’m
making it up actually, Buddha said that.
The path (Tibetan phrase) it’s a, it’s a deception but it’s a NECESSARY deception.
It’s a necessary deception. Let’s say you and I are in the desert. You are very thirsty.
Everywhere you look, you see mirage. You think this is water and you said you really
want to go to this water. Now I have been to the desert and I know that you are
hallucinating. Now I can be very unskilled, a little bit of compassion but not, no skilful
means, no wisdom. And then I can say – Hey, you shut up. This is not water, this is a
mirage, you just, you know. That’s not going to help you, you understand.

So if I’m compassionate, skilful then I might say – Yes, even knowing that this is not
true because I know you, you. I know that you will not hear me saying ‘This is not
water’. I will have to say - Yeah, let’s go, I might even go with you. And as we get
closer, you yourself will see it’s a fake. And this is what we call ‘skilful means of the
Buddha’. There is thousands of that; how many? Eighty-four thousand placebos
(laughter).
Student E: (unintelligible due to ‘noisy’ microphone)
Rinpoche: Yes, yes because why not, actually why not, placebo why not? Placebo
cure, cure much more than the real medicine, I heard (laughter). What do you mean
by real medicine? You mean truly existing?
Student E: (unintelligible due to noise)
Rinpoche: I will, I dare say Buddhadharma is a trick. It is a trick DEFINITELY; it is a
trick, do you know? It’s a WONDERFUL TRICK. It’s an amazing, compassionate, full
of wisdom trick (laughter). I’ll tell you something. Do you know he could have just
said – Hey guys, you are Buddha. That’s all he needed to say. Does it work? That
doesn’t do anything. We have the buddha-nature; all he has to say – Hey you are
Buddha. That’s all he needs to say.
But simplicity is not something that we are used to. We need complication. That’s
why he said eighty-four thousand teachings, hundred thousand prostrations,
mandala offerings, incense, lamps, Tibetan ritual, bell, damaru, all kinds of
complications. And we love it, we love it, we love it (laughter).
THE THREE LEVELS OF PERCEPTION

TEACHING ON THE THREE VISIONS (SNANG GSUM) OF THE
SAKYAPA
(Singapore 2003) by Dzongsar Jamyang Khyentse Rinpoche … 28/48
Student F: Rinpoche; eh, okay nowadays because when we follow a guru, we need
to check him right for three years; that’s traditionally the (Rinpoche: Three years?),
now we, we, I think most people won’t do that. So and then the essence of
Vajrayana is pure perception and that starts from the guru. We have to see the guru
as pure. That’s, I think that’s been one of the requirements for being a qualified
Vajrayana student. So but then if we follow a guru without checking, sometimes eh,
know we might think this he did something that we don’t think so, so…
Rinpoche: Checking, checking is important. That’s why you have to study first. You
should always study (Tibetan phrase) we call it. Here you should hear, you should
contemplate; you should really study. And then you should check but keep in mind
when you check the guru, this critical mind is not other than your own mind. You are
not bringing a sober mind to check. It’s your mind doing it.
So what I’m saying is you’ve to be, you have to have a little bit of a balance here
because you can check and check and check for next five hundred lifetimes, and it
does not mean that you will not find the fault one day. As long as you have impure
perception, you will always find one, right. But when you check, keep this in mind
(Tibetan phrase) – All this do not depend on a person but depend on his teachings.
Like it doesn’t matter whether he uses fork or chopstick when he eats noodle; that,
that shouldn’t matter.
But it does matter when he’s teaching you emptiness or soul, you understand? It’s
REALLY important; I’m, I’m serious. Some people choose guru just because they
use chopsticks over the fork. No, people do that because you can relate, that’s how
they do. You know we love our guru to have a similar quality like us. We love
anchovy pizza and if our guru likes; oh it’s bit like choosing wife actually (laughter).
You have to have a common, what do you call it? Something common to share with.

It’s a relationship; it’s really a big build-up of a relationship. A relationship is always
so complicated. Do you know why? Because we like our partner to have something
in common with oneself – Beethoven, I don’t know, Mozart, jazz, I don’t know,
Jennifer Lopez (laughter) I don’t know, something to talk about, right. But we also
want our partner to be slightly SPECIAL; because if he or she is completely like you
– boring (laughter). So human mind is so complicated; so is bit like guru, you know
guru is same.
THE THREE LEVELS OF PERCEPTION
TEACHING ON THE THREE VISIONS (SNANG GSUM) OF THE
SAKYAPA
(Singapore 2003) by Dzongsar Jamyang Khyentse Rinpoche … 29/48
We like our guru to be human. I mean imagine you have a guru. Whenever you invite
(him) to a restaurant for lunch, he flies in (laughter), sits on the table, looks at the
food, sucks in all the, you know food instantly – well if you have some superstitious-
ridden fans, they might get impressed but your normal friends, I don’t think they have
a good time with, you understand. You don’t like to have this superhuman quality at
all the times. Human mind is so complicated. We like our guru to be human but at
the same time slightly superhuman, not too superhuman (laughter).
So bear all this in mind and then analyse. What you need is the path to
enlightenment. Is he going to give this or not? Does he have this or not? And most of
all, is he or she interested in your enlightenment? That’s is SO IMPORTANT.
Because especially if you’re a Vajrayana practitioner, basically looking for a guru
means looking for someone to destroy you. You are basically hiring someone to
destroy you. You are giving him the payment of body, speech and mind, quality and
activity and all your belongings, and everything so that he’s going to destroy you.

Guru is someone who you don’t negotiate; no negotiations, no discussions, no
negotiations, no compromise, NOTHING. No scheduling, no; basically almost all the
questions that begin with ‘Wh’ has to be abandoned – WHY, WHAT, WHEN, WHO,
all of that. It’s difficult, very difficult. But if you want a quick enlightenment, it is a
necessity. It’s not necessary for everyone. If you’re, you know a Mahayana or
Shravakayana practitioner, guru devotion like as Vajrayana taught is not necessary.
You don’t need this burden of guru. Really it’s a burden; why would you like to have
someone to destroy you? (Laughter) No need.
Student G: (Too much noise, unintelligible)
Rinpoche: I don’t know whether they had one.
Student G: Rinpoche, when we do confession right, there, there is four powers that
we need right? One is not to repeat the bad karma again so, so we have to tell
Vajrasattva I promise not to repeat again. But I know tomorrow I will do it again; so
sometimes difficult to convince myself that I’m doing it sincerely.
Rinpoche: Yeah, that’s a good question. I should tell you something about that. First
of all, this makes a big difference between the Buddhist confession and other
religious confessions. In Buddhism confession is, confession is basically exposing
the ego, ego. Ego is always resting in its hideout. You TAKE IT OUT. You EXPOSE
IT. That’s the essence of the confession, you understand.
For that you see, you see normally the confession I think many religions, the
confession works like this. You do something bad. Every week you go to a
confession place. You confess and then you’re alright. Such kind of mentality suits
very well with the ego. What does ego want? Comfort, isn’t it? Sometimes ego feels
a little guilty because it has been bad boy so it needs some boxes to go and say –
Hey I have done this and that. And somebody from behind says – Oh, yeah okay
fine, now that you have (laughter), you understand.
Whereas in Buddhism, once and for all you have to destroy the ego. This is why
there’s that pledge of not doing. Of course as you said it’s difficult but that is the
determination and the motivation you have to have. As long as you have that

motivation and determination, even though we know that we will end up doing it – the
deed will be much weaker, so keep on doing it.
THE THREE LEVELS OF PERCEPTION
TEACHING ON THE THREE VISIONS (SNANG GSUM) OF THE
SAKYAPA
(Singapore 2003) by Dzongsar Jamyang Khyentse Rinpoche … 30/48
Student G: (Unintelligible due to noise from microphone)
Rinpoche: Yes, exactly, exactly. Yeah no ego also, of course. Ego is already kicked
out and in its place, a white guy holding a vajra and bell who calls, who calls himself
Vajrasattva sits (laughter), it’s different.
Student H: (Noise in recording – unintelligible)
Rinpoche: If your perception does not invite more jealousy, more pride, more anger,
then you are doing, becoming normal. Yah, if your perception is not bringing you
more trouble, there is (Student H: For yourself or for others?) Both, okay; so I think
that’s the impure perception today. Tomorrow we will discuss experiential perception
where having impure perception, now what do we do?
We try to get in touch, I mean we try to manipulate this impure perception with a
yogic method. That’s what we are going to do; what, what we are going to talk
tomorrow.

And then as I said the pure perception is beyond, maybe not beyond you but it’s
definitely beyond me. But we can intellectually talk a little bit. Pure perception; you
know it’s supposedly how an enlightened being look at things. That how, what I’m
supposed to talk. How, what kind of perception does enlightened beings have? Very
difficult to talk.
I can only give you some examples like an enlightened being will never enjoy a
detective movie (laughter). Do you know why? Because the whole reason why you
enjoy a suspense thriller is you don’t know what’s happening until the end. That’s
why you watch (laughter and applause). Okay that’s it.
(New day) So you’re going to, you have been going through the Triple Perception or
the Triple Vision. Again as we discussed yesterday, it’s good to give some moments
contemplating on why you are here, what kind of motivation. I’m stressing this
because the motivation, your motivation will determine or interpret your perception.
Some of you may be quite new with Buddhism; so for those who are new, I really
admire because it’s kind of a honeymoon period, really inspiring. Buddhism for many
of us, those who love wisdom, those who love intellectual approach to the spiritual
matters – it’s wonderful. Buddhism is very logical, rational; at the same time, it has
sort of endless depth. Therefore to be inspired by the Buddha, his teachings and the
example of his followers is AMAZING! It’s really, really wonderful.
But those who are jaded like myself, those who have been Buddhists for many,
many years or those who have been born as a Buddhist – jaded Buddhists, I call
them. Callus, is it? You know under our feet, there’s a part of flesh that has become
almost insensitive, you know like no feeling – the ‘callus’ Buddhists, jaded Buddhists.
These Buddhists like myself – we really need to seriously think about the motivation.
Motivation really makes a big difference.
THE THREE LEVELS OF PERCEPTION

TEACHING ON THE THREE VISIONS (SNANG GSUM) OF THE
SAKYAPA
(Singapore 2003) by Dzongsar Jamyang Khyentse Rinpoche … 31/48
As I stressed yesterday, for many of us, in the beginning we come to the Buddhist
path because we think Buddhism is going to fix your problematic life. That is not the
right motivation. That’s a very theistic motivation. Many do that. Christians do that.
I’m sure Muslims do this. Actually you don’t need Buddhism if you need to just fix the
problems in your life; you don’t need Buddhism.
Actually to tell the truth, Buddhism is not the best solution to fix your problem in your,
you know, in your life. Buddhism, I dare say is actually adds more problems
(laughter) because you hear all this information like impermanence, right. That
doesn’t help. It’s very sad - things like egoless-ness, all this doesn’t help.
Many of us, we come to Buddhist path because we think that Buddhism; I don’t think
blame you actually. The blame must; if there is any blame, it should go to the
teachers, especially the Tibetan teachers, I think. The Tibetan teachers, they portray
Buddhism as some kind of shamanistic ritual - ritualistic sort of okay you have this
problem, this is the remedy. Okay do this puja, do that puja, become do this, do that.
And if it is coming from the right view, right act, right meditation, right explanation –
wonderful. The Tantric methods are powerful, enlightening and compassionate –
amazing.
But if it is coming from purely a motivation to solve a temporal program, it’s
dangerous. It’s being, it’s misleading. And it’s because of this many of you guys, you
end up trying to learn Tibetan culture instead of learning Buddhism. I mean if you are
a Tibetologist, by all means go ahead. That’s what you are here for. But if you want
enlightenment, you don’t need Tibetan education, you don’t need the Tibetan culture
as the ultimate necessity.
Of course, whatever is given by the master - that is a necessity. I’m telling you this
because I’m, I’m questioning the motivation of many of us, including myself. You
know until today, as a Buddhist I can proudly say to the world that in the name of the

Buddha, Dharma and the Sangha, we have not yet massacred a lot of people,
caused bloodshed, invade others, other countries, convert them by force – we
haven’t done that YET; and I strongly emphasized the word ‘yet’ because it can
happen.
I think there is a tendency that it can happen because you know why? Because most
of the Buddhists, we are so much in love with the cultural aspect of Buddhism, not
the Buddha-dharma itself. A very important question to be asked, I, I believe, okay.
THE THREE LEVELS OF PERCEPTION
TEACHING ON THE THREE VISIONS (SNANG GSUM) OF THE
SAKYAPA
(Singapore 2003) by Dzongsar Jamyang Khyentse Rinpoche … 32/48
The second reason why I’m questioning this is – Why are we becoming Buddhists?
Why are we following the dharma, the path of Dharma? And what is it that we are
following? I think for many of us, we think Buddhism is just a discipline. It is a
discipline. It is some form of ethics, especially Confucius people like us. We love
ethics. We thrive based on ethics. We have heard a lot to be obedient to the father
and the mother, the grandparents, the ancestors, the master, all of that. Yes, I have
a sense, I have a feeling that again this sense of putting too much emphasis on
ethics, morality and discipline – is overriding the real Buddhism.
Real Buddhism, as we talked yesterday is an ART to destroy the paranoia, an art to
destroy obsession. Remember the example of shoes, the bedroom shoes? When
you manage to throw up in the sky and then you relax. That’s Buddhism! Really
C.C.L. – ‘couldn’t care less’, that’s real Buddhism! But we instead try to become, we
have become so paranoid. I will tell you, as a teacher I will tell you - I’m constantly
worried about if I do such things. Okay this I will tell you an example, not example, a,
a quote, a certain experience.

Recently I spent some time with my father. My father is considered a great
Mahasandhi master. And for so many years I didn’t really formally receive teachings
but I went there this time to ask some teachings. Of course, most of the teachings
are in the form of scolding, and thesis and all that (laughter).
But something really, something what he said really stuck me for days, for months;
really put me into another world, and really make me think for days. And after that I
really, really appreciate his words that came out of his experience. You know not just
being scholar. You know in Tibetan, we call it ‘mkhas btsun bzang po’, scholar or
learned, ‘btsun’ discipline, and ‘bzang po’ kind. I think many of us are attracted to a
learned scholar. I mean that’s already quite admirable. Please go ahead but we
should more admire those who are disciplined and learned.
But these two qualities can still be forgotten if we; we can still bypass these two if
you meet someone who is kind. And kindness comes through experience. So
anyway one thing that my father said was; he said, pointing at me he said – ‘You will
never achieve enlightenment in this life because’ – and I was sort of surprised and
you know stunned. And he said – ‘Do you know why? - Because you are so rational.
Rational, you are trapped by so-called rationalism’.
And that is so true because all the time, every time what I do, I do so that people will
not be upset, so that people will like me; almost so much so that sometimes I do
things so that people will praise me.
THE THREE LEVELS OF PERCEPTION
TEACHING ON THE THREE VISIONS (SNANG GSUM) OF THE
SAKYAPA
(Singapore 2003) by Dzongsar Jamyang Khyentse Rinpoche … 33/48

Discipline, you know we try, we, you know like someone points a camera at you, you
go like this (Rinpoche acted a pose). (Laughter) Because that’s what the Rinpoche’s
supposed to do, you know like smile a little bit, you understand and if you are bare
you know chested, immediately you try to cover it, you know like if somebody’s
seeing (laughter).
All this is called ‘sged chos’; ‘sged chos’ - it’s basically a vanity. It’s a VANITY. It’s
not difference between the legs and the breasts we were talking yesterday.
Remember Cosmopolitan type; this is a spiritual Cosmopolitan. It’s a complete show,
its hypocrisy. Nothing inside; all you’re trying to do is behave nice so that people will
like you. You’re deceiving yourself and you are deceiving others.
And do you know where this comes from? Thinking that dharma is a good discipline
or a good morality or a fixer of problems in our life. We have to TRANSCEND this.
So what do we do? Well, use any teachings such as the great mahasiddha Virupa,
the great Sakyapa master’s pith instructions which in this case is Snang Gsum.
So instead of having such kind of motivation, what kind of motivation should we
apply? Motivation to change, alter, rearrange our perception. That’s all Snang Gsum
is, Triple Vision, right? We have impure perception. We have impure perception
because all our perceptions are stemming, coming from ego, jealousy, pride; we
talked about that yesterday, remember, lengthy we talked. All our perceptions, our
friends, our enemies, what was it? Eh, Rolls Royce, legs - remember we talked
about that. I mean all this is impure perception because it stems from hope and fear.
It comes from you know wanting to be, to fit into the society.
I’ve a good example. I use it many times, and I will use it again. It’s like wearing tie.
You know we, we wear tie. This piece of cloth, tie, is actually the most useless thing.
It doesn’t have holes to keep coins. It’s not big enough to keep you warm. It chokes
you while you are eating. But I’m sure many of you know this piece of ‘striped rope’,
basically is one piece of clothes that takes long time to choose. When you go to the
shop, when you buy you have really know how to choose a tie? Which goes with this
tie, you know work with a certain suit that you have or the belt or the colour of your
shoes. Everything has to be matched, isn’t it?

It’s most difficult and also when you put it ON, it’s difficult. It’s not like a jacket you
sort of put it on. You have to tie and all that. And moreover, I’ve noticed that you
know sometimes when I go inside an elevator, you know in a big building. You,
you’re in an elevator; the lift has mirror. As soon as some executive, so-called
executive businessman – they walk in, if there’s a mirror – they all look at the mirror,
well like that, a little bit (laughter). They are all fixing this. It’s really, it’s like; that is a
constant PARANOIA basically. It’s a constant paranoia from the day, the time that he
has put on in the morning until he took off. It’s paranoia, constant paranoia, that’s so
much.
THE THREE LEVELS OF PERCEPTION
TEACHING ON THE THREE VISIONS (SNANG GSUM) OF THE
SAKYAPA
(Singapore 2003) by Dzongsar Jamyang Khyentse Rinpoche … 34/48
AND some of these ties are so expensive. Designer ties are SO expensive. One tie I
think can feed almost one thousand kids in Ethiopia for a month. I really think so;
they’re, they’re so expensive.
Now here in, by the great saint Virupa, what is he saying? He’s not saying that you
should not wear tie. No, not at all; if you say okay, the tie is useless, it’s ridiculous,
it’s not, it’s not good, therefore you should not wear tie. He’s not saying that because
if he says that, then its bit like Shravakayana path isn’t it? Escapism, renounces,
renounce the tie, get rid of the tie – he’s not saying that. What is he saying? He’s
saying you should wear the tie, but know at the same time it’s ridiculous.
Wearing the tie and you should really wear it nicely and keep on thinking this is the
most useless, ridiculous piece of cloth I’m wearing (laughter). Impure perception
okay, this is the, this is my impure perception but I’m putting it on so that my boss will
be happy, so that my colleagues will be happy, so that some people might get

inspired by my looks, you understand. Now if you can combine this, then this is what
we call accepting ridiculousness of the samsara into the path.
The Vajrayana tantric path is like a big recycle machine. You know you; you collect
all kinds of garbage and make it into something useable. That is the whole purpose
of Tantra.
So impure perception is something that we have discussed, I believe yesterday. So
today we sort of briefly discuss experiential perception. Okay we have all these kinds
of impure perception so what do we do? We try to alter this, we try to change this
with practice. That’s what we call yogi’s experiential perception, that’s what we are
doing. Very briefly, no time and I don’t know anything anyway - the time is just an
excuse.
There’s many different ways to alter this perception. One, most popular and most
economical, user-friendly (laughter) eh, what do we call it? Risk-free, a lot of bonus,
lots of profit is called ‘love’ meditation, meditation on love, loving kindness, yeah.
See you are now beginning to change, alter this perception.
Loving kindness; loving kindness is basically a wish to make sentient beings; you’re
wishing them to be happy and not only wishing them to be happy but you wish so
that they know how to gather or they have the cause of happiness, you understand.
That’s, that’s loving kindness meditation.
THE THREE LEVELS OF PERCEPTION
TEACHING ON THE THREE VISIONS (SNANG GSUM) OF THE
SAKYAPA
(Singapore 2003) by Dzongsar Jamyang Khyentse Rinpoche … 35/48

But of course; okay so you wish them happiness; you wish the sentient beings
happiness. That’s a big term, huh. Happiness is a very big term. I mean for some, a
gentle stroke is happiness; for others, whips and chains is happiness. So as a
Mahayana Buddhist, are you giving both? Whoever wants yeah stroke, whips and
chains – are you going to distribute? What is happiness for George Bush is
unhappiness for Saddam Hussein (laughter). What is happiness for Saddam
Hussein is you know ‘turned on’ for George Bush.
So how do you then meditate? So actually we know the happiness – when the
Buddhists talk about, when the Vajrayana talks about happiness, they are talking
about related to the dharma – everybody wants to be happy. There is no dispute
between the Buddha and the sentient beings as far as wanting to be happy. But the
sentient beings don’t know how to gather the happiness. Instead they end up
creating, gathering cause and condition that will make them SUFFER
So now that you know ANYTHING coming from emotions; jealousy, pride, anger,
desire give you unhappiness. Any kind of experience coming from an absence of
ego, absence of ignorance, jealousy, pride and all the rest gives you happiness. And
this is the happiness that you are wishing the sentient beings to have.
Few tips; it’s easy to think “May all sentient things have happiness”; kind of abstract
idea. It’s very easy because you don’t have, because it’s ALL sentient beings, you
don’t have much responsibility actually. So you should think like many Kadampa
masters say - while thinking 'May all sentient beings have happiness', you should
actually care each and every individual's happiness. So pick one; if you want your
practice to be, you know to be effective pick someone who, whom you don't like so
much. Or pick someone who you feel threatened by, your competitor, you know
competition. Your competitor is not necessarily a business competitor or anything.
Competitor can be anywhere, right.
If you walk along a beach and then suddenly you see a beautiful person, a girl or a
boy, and you two are alone - no competitor, right. Then you're about what, what do
you call it? Chat her up, right; chat her up; you're about to pick on a conversation and
just as about you want to talk, somebody walks in. He's also quite handsome,
dramatic. Oh, now you have a competitor, another soul. So competitor is everywhere
in your thinking, in, in our every day to day life there is a competitor; there's always
somebody competing with you, to take over your position, to take over your ...

THEY MIGHT NOT actually, they are not, they, they didn't come there to take over
but you, your paranoia thinks because you, you're paranoid. You have so much
impure perception you think - 'Oh, oh, here comes a competitor'. For all we know,
maybe this person is there to help you so that you can actually do what you want to
do, but we don't think like that. We are always paranoid. We think that somebody is
going to take over your position. So pick an individual being and then start doing the
loving kindness meditation.
THE THREE LEVELS OF PERCEPTION
TEACHING ON THE THREE VISIONS (SNANG GSUM) OF THE
SAKYAPA
(Singapore 2003) by Dzongsar Jamyang Khyentse Rinpoche … 36/48
If that, if you still need some kind of format, then use Atisha Dipamkara’s method
such as tonglen – breath out and give all the happiness and cause of happiness;
breath in all the cause of suffering and suffering of the others, stuff like that.
Okay what’s happening here? Big alteration of impure perception, can you see that?
See in the past, you have impure perception because you think you, whatever ego
has interpreted is the most important but now you are changing that. In the past, you
think you are only thinking about your own happiness, you are not really thinking
about others. Now you are forcing yourself – May the other person be happy. May he
or she has the cause of happiness.
See there is a disruption of impure perception. If you keep on doing this loving
kindness meditation, such a yogi will have so-called EXPERIENTIAL perception. Do
you know what that is? Let’s go back to the beach. You know a yogi is walking on
the beach and yogi is seeing a beautiful person and about to start a conversation

with this. Somebody walks along and interrupts, ah, yogi oh, happy – May he or she;
yeah please you two go ahead, you know have conversation.
You walk; experiential; see the perception has changed now. No paranoia; you,
you’re okay, that’s good, couldn’t care less. They can talk to their heart felt, to their
hearts’ content they can talk, talk and talk. See perception really, remember
yesterday we were talking. We were talking about me actually; about you know
PERCEPTION. You know it really doesn’t take long at times to change our
perception.
You know your beloved boyfriend or girlfriend or husband or wife whom you have
been together for twenty years; it will take just one afternoon, one conversation –
someone tells that your boyfriend has tails or six navels or I don't know, three nipples
or something like that. You will want to look at it, you understand and out of
paranoia, you might even find one (laughter). From then on, you will like to sterilize
all your things. Every single space that your boyfriend or girlfriend touches, you'll feel
very strange. Yeah perception; perception is easy to change, easy, it's really easy. I
have seen this a lot. I'm sure you have experienced this a lot.
Some, some of us here, you know, we make such a good friend, remember. Really
you know they, they even introduced - Oh, Rinpoche, this is my BEST friend. And
then they travelled along like a shadow; everywhere they go, they were together.
They shared everything, everything; all the cigarettes they share. Six years later.
with one stupid reason; it can be as stupid as a dry maple leave falling over your
head. Really it doesn't take any profound reason. It could be a very stupid reason
and that reason can trigger a big misunderstanding.
Now you are in a big trouble. Do you know why? - Because the other person knows
all your secrets (laughter). He can sue you, he can blackmail you. There are
photographs that you have taken together, you understand. And there are so many
things you two have done secretly. No one has known, your parents definitely didn't
know and he or she is going to, is threatening - I'm going to show this photo. I'm sure
some, something like this, maybe not to that, this extent. But something similar has
happened to you if you can recall.
And then what happens. Your best friend has now become the worst enemy.
Perception has changed.

THE THREE LEVELS OF PERCEPTION
TEACHING ON THE THREE VISIONS (SNANG GSUM) OF THE
SAKYAPA
(Singapore 2003) by Dzongsar Jamyang Khyentse Rinpoche … 37/48
The perception is easy to change, really. Please think, from now think that dharma
practice is an art to change perception. And once you change the perception, really
then you are released from all this paranoia and that’s enlightenment. This is how
you check, how you’ve to educate yourself.
Why are we chanting mantras? You know some of you, especially the Sakyapa
students, reading all these sadhanas, Hevajra, Vajrayogini like this, like paying tax
you know like paying tax. Every year we have to pay tax to the government
(laughter) you know like this uh, maybe a remote control on the television you know
what. And then maybe some of you listen to the mobile phone on the horse race or
who’s winning, Manchester United or Liverpool; still going like this, reading because
somehow we have been told that since you have received the abhisheka, you must
read this sadhana. So this has now become a BURDEN! It’s a burden, even the
SIGHT of the sadhana really makes you sick (laughter) .They’re this thick, they’re
this thick.
But if you think in terms of changing the perception, especially the sadhana
practitioners, really important - I mean like the Hevajra sadhana. Even though this is
not the right time; I will not be talking too much otherwise I’ll be breaking the samaya
of leaking things. You know those who are practising the sadhana, like the Hevajra
mandala, just creating the mandala, you know the eight cemeteries, the dakinis, the
eh, siddhis, the Cause Heruka, the Result Heruka – they are just the most
sophisticated way of changing our perception - changing the eyeball into what
(Tibetan phrase) mm, the, the dakini of ignorance, right, stuff like that. You know
that.

Basically it’s, you’re trying to change the perception, so loving kindness that’s risk-
free, economical, eh, handy, hands-on meditation – way of changing the perception,
way of changing the impure perception.
Next comes compassion, a wish to free the suffering of sentient beings and the
cause of suffering. Very similar, I’m not going to elaborate this, so love, compassion
and then the bodhicitta. Bodhicitta – now that is the essence, quintessence of the
Mahayana teaching. Without that there is no Mahayana path. Really important; it is
because of the bodhicitta, a bodhisattva never gets tired helping sentient beings.
So in the bodhicitta okay, there’re two kinds of bodhicitta – relative bodhicitta and the
ultimate bodhicitta. Relative bodhicitta; okay bodhicitta is not just wanting sentient
beings to have some kind of good time. Okay that’s, that’s really kindergarten you
know stuff; everybody has you know. It’s not just to, just wanting them to have nice
time. Bodhicitta is wishing the sentient beings to have enlightenment. It’s just, the
subject is very big. If you keep on talking about it, I will never reach Johore Bahru
tonight (laughter), I think.
THE THREE LEVELS OF PERCEPTION
TEACHING ON THE THREE VISIONS (SNANG GSUM) OF THE
SAKYAPA
(Singapore 2003) by Dzongsar Jamyang Khyentse Rinpoche … 38/48
Anyway I want to clarify something here, just out of my experience huh. You know
sometimes we go to see the lamas, yeah. And then some of these lamas are SO
gentle, so soft and they don’t scold their students who have so much ego, so much
pride, so much jealousy. They just, they’re so nice to them and what do we say? Oh,

he is a great bodhisattva. It’s because of his bodhicitta he’s being so compassionate
but I can’t stand these guys! Yeah, I think it’s a good example.
This kind of thing intrigues me because I DON’T KNOW whether the lama is a great
bodhisattva or not. Sometimes you go and see these lamas, okay, some lamas who
do not give a DAMN about what people think or what his disciple…Okay, he, he
might scold this disciple not for some petty thing but because he wants to destroy his
ego and pride. And he is risking it because he might lose his disciple by scolding.
Okay next door there’s a very good Rinpoche who is gentle, soft and all that
(laughter).
And this Rinpoche is going like this, scolding, grill him and mince him – RISKING, it’s
a big risk because he might go to the other. But this Rinpoche doesn’t care; he, he
needs, he says what he needs to say. He says what he, what the student NEEDS to
hear, not what the student wants to hear. I think he is a bodhisattva.
Why? I was talking about the bodhicitta, remember. Bodhicitta is not just a wish to
make someone sort of happy and sort of give him a lollipop and you know like; it’s
not that. Bodhicitta is really concentrating on making the other person get rid of their
ego, pride and all these emotions and make him reach enlightenment. And what is
enlightenment? CCL, absence of paranoia, remember. Bodhicitta is a wish to cut the
chain of these unnecessary formalities and all these rituals, and habitual patterns
and inhibitions. I mean ‘inhibitions’, that’s right, that, that’s the right word.
We have so much inhibition. First of all we have an inhibition as a human being.
Secondly we have an inhibition as a Chinese. Then we have an inhibition as a
Buddhist. We have then inhibition as Mahayana Buddhists, all kinds of inhibitions.
We collect more and more inhibitions and each time we collect, the inhibitions are
more sophisticated. Sophisticated inhibitions mean more difficult to overcome
inhibitions. That’s what we do. So you know what, what I mean – a Bodhicitta is a
wish to enlighten others. That’s a relative bodhicitta anyway, very necessary;
amazing, so special. Without that Mahayana has no path.

THE THREE LEVELS OF PERCEPTION
TEACHING ON THE THREE VISIONS (SNANG GSUM) OF THE
SAKYAPA
(Singapore 2003) by Dzongsar Jamyang Khyentse Rinpoche … 39/48
In all this talk of impure perception and experiential perception, there’s something
quite important to know especially based in the Sakyapa view. When we say
‘perception’ you see everything is your perception and all this perception is divided
into three – impure, experiential and pure.
We are not indicating that these are our perceptions but there Is something ELSE
truly existing as a perceiver or something beyond these perceptions. We are not
saying that. That’s all there is – impure perception, experiential perception and pure
perception. What we see is all our perceptions, and these perceptions change all the
time. And they do not exist as a truly, independently, unchanging, unchangingly –
they don’t.
We have explained this again and again - like a friend, you look at your friend and
when you’re looking at your friend, you are perceiving a phenomenon that which you
refer as ‘my best friend’ for now anyway. With a little bit of wrong information or
something happens between you two, overnight changes. Tomorrow you look at this
same phenomenon, then you’re looking at someone who cannot be trusted,
someone who has betrayed you, ugly, irritating, yeah. Neither that good guy nor this
bad guy; neither that good guy yesterday, good guy and today’s bad guy – they do
not exist as externally, independently, truly out there. THAT’S THE, that’s the really
fundamental Sakyapa view, has to, you know you have registered that.
So you know, we talked yesterday, what is LIFE? Life is just a ‘continuum’
perception. And if we have impure perception, we will suffer; therefore we should
change this impure perception – with what? - With love and compassion meditation
and the bodhicitta meditation. Through that we will alter this impure perception.
That’s how you should understand.

Okay, now for the ultimate bodhicitta. Ultimate bodhicitta, you know we were talking
yesterday – in Buddhism, wisdom should be emphasized. Wisdom is above
everything. This is very much we are saying when we are talking about ultimate
bodhicitta. There is a relative bodhicitta which is the wish to enlighten all the sentient
beings; not just giving them some food or drinks, not just save them from temporary
suffering but REALLY take them to the enlightenment. But the ultimate bodhicitta is
absolutely necessary. If without ultimate bodhicitta, yeah, then relative bodhicitta
would not work.
Just now as I walked in, someone asked me a related question which is good so I
can explain to you now. See a BODHISATTVA, when he or she is helping sentient
beings, this bodhisattva helps with an understanding of relative and ultimate
bodhicitta, both. When we talk about ultimate bodhicitta, we are saying everything is
emptiness, everything is just your perception, nothing exists externally. This
information is SO IMPORTANT.
THE THREE LEVELS OF PERCEPTION
TEACHING ON THE THREE VISIONS (SNANG GSUM) OF THE
SAKYAPA
(Singapore 2003) by Dzongsar Jamyang Khyentse Rinpoche … 40/48
Remember we talked about the doctor yesterday. The doctor, maybe not here,
somewhere else; my mind is becoming like a jelly so I don’t remember anything. See
a psychiatrist, trying to help a crazy person; for this non-bodhisattva psychiatrist,
okay, psychiatrist that’s not a bodhisattva or maybe a small-time bodhisattva but not
a bodhisattva who understands the ultimate truth. This psychiatrist, way he or she
works with this crazy person is like this.
As a psychiatrist, you develop a goal, saying - okay this man is crazy, I have; this
man is abnormal, I have to make him NORMAL. I’m just giving a very general

example and you develop a notion called ‘normality’ - through what? Through the
books, through the education you know, coming from Mr Freud. Mr Freud has
caused more problems than help sometimes. Mr Freud has designed a so-called
normalcy, normality. Every psychiatrist believes that THAT is normality, okay.
And then the psychiatrist is helping and trying so hard to make this abnormal person,
so-called abnormal person to reach to this normality when in fact this person should
be normal but normal in HERE and different kinds of normality. But the psychiatrist
doesn’t accept this kind of normality because it’s never written in the book. This
wasn’t part of your degree in your university and this was after all not taught by Mr
Freud or Jung, you understand. So you end up making a, a normal person
ABNORMAL most of the time (laughter).
And do you know why? Because most of these people think so-called normalcy does
exist truly, so-called disease does exist truly whereas a bodhisattva who
understands the ultimate truth, for him or her so-called normality and abnormality are
all interdependent. There is no such thing as truly existing normality, truly existing
abnormality. The only thing that is real peace is going beyond normality and
abnormality which is the enlightenment, yeah. That’s the, sort of really general
example of ultimate bodhicitta.
And this ultimate bodhicitta must accompany with everything even like lighting a
lamp, yeah, candle. Okay let’s say you’re opening a shoe shop somewhere in, I don’t
know, Lucky Plaza is it? Yeah and you go to one of these fortune-tellers or a LAMA
actually (laughter) and he tells you – You should light some butter, what candle
lamps, you know candles, so candles, basically lots of candles.
When you don’t have the ultimate bodhicitta, what does that mean? No ultimate
bodhicitta means that you really think that the shoe shop exists. Therefore success
of the shoe shop exists; failure of the shoe shop exists. Therefore you hope for the
truly existing success of the shoe shop. You fear for the truly existing failure of the
shoe shop, yeah. So you now offer a truly existing candle and because you are so
much clinging to this truly existing candle if it doesn’t burn properly you worry. It
creates some superstition – Oh, it’s not burning well. Is it a bad sign? And then you
do another more. You do another, you go to another fortune-teller and ask – My
candle didn’t burn properly. Does that mean something? Should I do another round
of rituals?

Like that, it goes on and on because the base, the non-existence of all these is not
understood. But this is DIFFICULT; of course this is REALLY, REALLY - that is the
understanding of emptiness. That is a really, really difficult to come but anyway
briefly ultimate bodhicitta is ‘understanding the nature of everything which is
emptiness’, okay.
THE THREE LEVELS OF PERCEPTION
TEACHING ON THE THREE VISIONS (SNANG GSUM) OF THE
SAKYAPA
(Singapore 2003) by Dzongsar Jamyang Khyentse Rinpoche … 41/48
So what do we do? To do that, to really realize the emptiness, first Shantideva said
(Tibetan phrase) – only with insight wisdom, only with the wisdom can penetrate the
cause of impure perception which is ego, yeah. The cause of the impure perception
is our ego, our emotions. You can only penetrate them with the wisdom, wisdom of
understanding that things do not exist truly. But this kind of insight wisdom can only
happen when you have a really good shamatha as a ground, as a foundation; so
Shantideva said must, one must fly apply shamatha method before the vipassana.
And even this shamatha, shamatha can only come when you have a proper
renunciation and revulsion towards the samsara. Renunciation mind - I think we
talked about a little bit about renunciation mind earlier. Remember we were talking
about this tie – What should a Vajrayana practitioner, how should a Vajrayana
practitioner understand renunciation? Just like a tie; it’s ridiculous, but you wear it
still. You keep on thinking it is ridiculous – that’s, that’s really the best form of
renunciation. Don’t deprive yourself with the tie because if you do that, then it’s bit
like a sort of Shravakayana kind of renunciation.
Basically you have to realize all this so-called worldly pleasure, worldly success,
worldly gain has no essence. And if you look at it carefully it is true. They have no

end. There is no essence. We have done SO MUCH and we have acquired so
much. We have managed to achieve so much, but never enough. We still want more
and we think it’s necessary. And many times it is not.
Remember like shopping; maybe the twelfth jean is enough, but you shop as if
you’re going to live for one thousand years. Remember that bit we talk yesterday;
because our mind is; you know why do we have, why, why the renunciation is
difficult? Of course a big part is attachment and attraction towards this beautiful, you
know like Armani, what else? - Giordano, Chic, Durable, all this but partly because of
insecurity, insecurity of thinking one, one don’t have enough - not really,
You know I always think in the West, during the Sixties, during the Beatles’ time, is it
changed now? It’s become so, you know, you know the whole hip, the whole hippie
culture actually initiated with a kind of renunciation but they, you know somehow they
got distracted. I, I wish they, they revive the real hippie culture. I was reading this a
little bit and I’m really interested with this. During the Sixties there was all this hippie
movement, bohemian movement, sort of hippie life-style. And it actually came up
from a very interesting thought. Because what they think was the society structure,
structure that is given and designed by a great man up there, President, Prime
Minister, you know Parliament is just created by someone else.
And why should we follow this? Why should we become a slave of a consumer
society? Why should when, when, when Giorgio Armani says – This is the best jean
– why should we give in to it? You know when, when McDonalds says ‘This is the
best food’, when Coca-Cola company says ‘This is the real thing’, something like that
– why should we, why should we give in to that? Why, why don’t we plant our own
tomato? Why don’t we plant our own vegetable gardens? Why don’t we knit our own
clothes? Why don’t we be self-sufficient? It actually, the hippie movement in Sixties
actually was quite, quite an enlightening one I always thought. You can even hear
from some of these songs, you know the Beatles and all that.
But it, it has then again got corrupted, you know like all the other spiritual paths. You
know the hippie movement has now; now everybody is like hippie outside but yuppie
inside (laughter). There’s really no point.

THE THREE LEVELS OF PERCEPTION
TEACHING ON THE THREE VISIONS (SNANG GSUM) OF THE
SAKYAPA
(Singapore 2003) by Dzongsar Jamyang Khyentse Rinpoche … 42/48
What we should we be doing; you know the Vajrayana practitioner, what is the
essence of Vajrayana practitioner? - Hippie inside, yuppie outside (laughter); not the
other round. Nowadays most of these hippies – they have a big account, credit
cards, all of that. They just wear ragged clothes when they go to Kathmandu. That’s
about it. But there’s no letting go, there’s no sense of not being a slave of consumer
society.
And, and most of us especially Asians, we are, we are in a way very much obedient
society. We have been so obedient with Mr. Confucius, what is it, Guangzhi is it? -
Zhuangzi, yeah so sad. I cannot understand why the ancient Chinese didn’t give,
didn’t surrender to someone like Lao Tzu. I think his wisdom is for me, much more
dynamic, free-thinking eh, but then again I can understand because like Buddhism.
Buddhism can never be misused by political leader. Do you know why? No political
leader can come up and say – ‘Hey you guys, better behave otherwise emptiness
will punish you’ (laughter).
Like, like, like Christians and Muslims, all these, Confucius you know again – ‘You
better behave otherwise the ancestors will look up upon you or the god will punish
you and all that’. Basically we have built a certain structure or a society that CCL
(Couldn’t Care Less) is just impossible. CCL is just impossible. The very teacher who
teaches you how to be CCL, they also create another pattern so that you fall into a
certain trap so that you become NOT CCL. You become completely contrived,
completely hypocrite - all because of lack of understanding of the ultimate bodhicitta.
Anyway renunciation mind is what we apply and then do the shamatha, shamatha
meditation. Of course, there’s many different ways. In the Sakyapa tradition, initially
we use a flower, a blue flower but that doesn’t really matter. But anyway if you want
to pursue the ‘Path and Fruit’ teaching of Sakyapa, Lamdre, then the blue flower is

really good because blue colour not only represents the emptiness but it represents
the colour of Hevajra’s body. So you already get used to this kind of symbol; you get,
you get already connected to this kind of deity. All of that – please get your personal
instructions from your personal guru. It’s not my, my job and this job shouldn’t be
given to me also, anyway with a lot of reasons. I am just not responsible person. I
am very selfish. Really try to think this - don’t look for a teacher like me (laughter).
Do you know why? Really try not to be my student because the problem is I love
myself too much (laughter). I don’t care about your enlightenment. So if I, since I
love myself so much, if you come and if you make mistake…remember earlier
example I gave you. I will say – 'Okay, don’t worry' (laughter) you know. So I will
have more and more population, members of my disciple you understand. I will not
go and say – 'Don’t do this, don’t do that' - because I’m so scared I will lose you.
Feeling of rejection, it's terrible; being rejected by your student – Wow, that’s, that’s
PAINFUL, you understand. So if you want enlightenment, I’m not the right person to
be teaching you, really, seriously – from the bottom of my heart, I’m confessing this
(laughter). I’m not joking or anything like that.
If you, really if you become my student, I will tell you what you want to hear. Hardly I
will tell you what you need to hear. That’s one side of me. The second side of me is I
am just impossible to handle, I tell you, impossible. REALLY, REALLY the most
obnoxious, most spoiled, most selfish, most hard to find anyway you know so just...
THE THREE LEVELS OF PERCEPTION
TEACHING ON THE THREE VISIONS (SNANG GSUM) OF THE
SAKYAPA
(Singapore 2003) by Dzongsar Jamyang Khyentse Rinpoche … 43/48
There are so many, many great enlightened beings and especially the members of
the Sakya centre here, you are so blessed by the presence of the great Vajradhara

HIMSELF, His Holiness. He is, I mean it is amazing to think sometimes you; I
sometimes think it's just amazing that His Holiness Sakya Trizin, actually IN FLESH,
WALK on this earth.
I mean maybe in this age because we are such a jaded person like a Parisian who
still haven't gone to Eiffel Tower because the Eiffel Tower is right there and we think
- Oh well, I'll go tomorrow - so they end up not going for generations. So sometimes
His Holiness is so kind of available and we just call him in Rajpur, we just email him.
When he comes here, you can just talk to him. So we get so jaded and we don't
appreciate. I really think in about, I don't know; in many years if you think back, you
will realize it is just AMAZING that someone like His Holiness Sakya Trizin has
actually WALKED on this earth, WALKED in this room, SAT on this throne, talked.
Actually we have HEARD a voice, his voice - so much blessings.
When there is no more of these great masters, then you have no choice but to settle
with jackals like us (laughter), you understand. Then you have no choice but right
now you have so much choice, and you have a good choice. So much merit; you
have to appreciate your own merit, having met great masters like His Holiness.
And one of the REALLY eh, sort of encouraging, incredibly encouraging eh, source
of happiness is both heirs, both Dungse Rinpoches, they are really arising as a great
master.
And then the young Luding Khen Rinpoche, I have seen recently in eh, Taiwan and I
was so touched because I know him from very young. You know he’s kind of you
know age-wise he’s sort of like junior to me but he has really eh, I don’t know,
worldly speaking matured. But not only matured, he’s more than matured. He had,
he’s very special, not only a combination of two great families, the Khon family and
the Dagchen Sharpa family which comes, which where the Luding, or the Luding
lineage actually arise from.
But I think eh, masters like Luding Khenpo, the young Luding Khenpo is really a
great hope for us. Not only that, they are someone whom you can handle, whom you
can be with and you can find them also, because they are, they are not difficult and
spoilt and just impossible eh, person like someone, some of you know. Right, like
you know so you think like that and eh, get as many teachings as possible from

them. Anyway where were, where, what track were we? I completely lost my track
now (laughter).
THE THREE LEVELS OF PERCEPTION
TEACHING ON THE THREE VISIONS (SNANG GSUM) OF THE
SAKYAPA
(Singapore 2003) by Dzongsar Jamyang Khyentse Rinpoche … 44/48
So the shamatha; so first we develop the shamatha okay, whatever way. Some of
you, those who are practicing the Lamdre, use the blue flower or whatever. Some of
those who are Theravadan or Shravakayana path holder, breathing in and out, it
doesn’t matter really. Basically like zazen, the Zen tradition, you just sit. Sit and sit
and sit and you concentrate on an object. That’s all you do. It’s an INCREDIBLE
method. Do you know why?
Remember all this time we have been talking about impure perception. Do you know
why you have this endless chain-like impure perception? Remember we talked
yesterday, you think about a beach. This beach relates to California. California
beach relates to Hollywood, Hollywood relates to Jennifer Lopez. Jennifer Lopez
relates to - something else, I don’t know. It goes on and on and on. Impure
perception like a chain, endlessly so strong, so solid – comes in our being just
endlessly. Do you know why?
Because you give them the chance to happen this way; you give them. Remember I
was telling you – you sit in the living room for two minutes, you get bored, you search
for remote control. Switch on the television – more impure perception. Of course,
that’s REALLY impure perception, isn’t it? And then one perception is not enough;
there’s about fifty channels of impure perception. If that’s not enough, you have to
throw a party and then remember all the way to the kinky stuff. All kinds of things we
have impure perception.

And this is because we, we need to have impure perception almost. It’s like we are
ADDICTED, we are addicted to impure perception. Even for one minute, we cannot,
cannot sit still without some kind of injection of kind of entertainment, songs, dance,
or music or a television or a novel to read.
And lastly dharma also; dharma is also a bit of entertainment because it’s so, makes
you feel that you have practiced at least. You know it’s like how do you feel when
you finish doing your sadhana, huh? (Laughter) So such a big relief (laughter), isn’t
it? This is why I do in the morning. If you do the sadhana in the evening, my god, the
whole day you have to worry (laughter). So doing the sadhana is like – do it and GET
DONE WITH IT; and if you don’t do it, yeah it’s like that.
We need constant injection of entertainment and that’s why they are coming, coming
and getting you more and more, and you get more and more obsessed. So during
the shamatha, what do you do? You completely let go of them. And all you are
thinking is some stupid blue flower. All the others, when they come, you just go back
to the flower. By doing so this chain of thoughts, this chain of impure perceptions is
becoming; you know like as you’re thinking, all these thoughts come normally. But
this time all you think about is the blue flower or the breathing.
THEN SUDDENLY the impure perceptions, they are shot, they don’t know what to
do with you. Because normally you’re, you are waiting there hungrily opening your
arms and mouth, you know like not, not enough. But this time suddenly you are not
paying attention to them. That’s it. Shamatha meditation is basically an art of
ignoring entertainment, an art to ignore the impure perceptions.
THE THREE LEVELS OF PERCEPTION
TEACHING ON THE THREE VISIONS (SNANG GSUM) OF THE
SAKYAPA
(Singapore 2003) by Dzongsar Jamyang Khyentse Rinpoche … 45/48

As you only concentrate on the breathing or the blue flower, all the rest, impure
perceptions, they don’t know what to do. So for first few months they will really
bother you with their bells and sounds – Hey, you know pay attention to us, you
know like a, like a spoilt brat. They, they like you to, you know pay attention to them;
don’t care. All you look is this blue flower. And then impure perceptions slowly,
slowly give in. Then you know what to do with them.
If you want two impure perceptions, you can have two. One of them if you want to
dismiss by three o’clock, you dismiss; so impure perception is under your control and
that’s what we call experiential perception, you understand. Now that’s just a very
brief introduction to the shamatha. We have no time.
Now the vipassana; after developing a good foundation of shamatha, you then do
the vipassana. There are many, many ways of doing the vipassana. Basically
vipassana is a wisdom that understands egoless-ness. That you can do as normally
what the Shravakayana and Mahayana does – analytical meditation, kusuli’s you
know concentration meditation.
But those who are practising for instance Lamdre like Lam Dus, you know the
Hevajra practice – Hevajra practice is actually not other than the vipassana
meditation. I mean actually the whole sadhana consists of both shamatha and
vipassana. For instance if you are concentrating you know, okay; okay let’s start with
the Refuge.
You visualize the Refuge object in front of you; guru in the form of Hevajra, all of
that. EVEN THAT even that has a little bit of vipassana and shamatha, by visualizing
the guru as a Hevajra - that has both shamatha and vipassana. You know why?
Okay you visualize the guru in front of you as a form of Hevajra and concentrating on
that has the shamatha effect, right. That is the shamatha and you don’t; normally
when you visualize the guru, you don’t visualize the guru as how you see. You know
like His Holiness Sakya Trizin, for instance, but you transform him into Hevajra.
His Holiness Sakya Trizin has only two arms, right? (Laughter) Right but we, we
transform him with sixteen arms, blue colour with Vajra Nairatmya, wrathful, fangs

and all of that. What does this do? This cuts the impure perception of His Holiness
Sakya Trizin, a Tibetan, two arms, one who lives in Rajpur, one who goes to toilet
sometimes (laughter), one who eats, one who eh, one who does eh, walk when he
needs to come downstairs but one who doesn’t fly down to the, you know throne. All
these are impure perception.
And this impure perception comes from the ego so that needs to be cut out. So that’s
why we transform him as because after all, it’s your idea. Right now we have enough
merit to see His Holiness as you know the kind Tibetan lama who is so humble, so
gentle. That’s the only merit we have. If we accumulate our merit more and more,
maybe in few years – bluish colour, sixteen arms, all of that. And then we
accumulate MORE merit, more and more merit. One day you realize that guru is not
other than your, your own mind.
Then there’s it. That’s the end of the, end of the Buddhism, end of the Vajrayana. No
more going to the teachings at last; no more sadhanas’ reading you understand, no
more of those.
THE THREE LEVELS OF PERCEPTION
TEACHING ON THE THREE (SNANG GSUM) OF THE SAKYAPA
(Singapore 2003) by Dzongsar Jamyang Khyentse Rinpoche … 46/48
So even in the sadhana, like just visualizing the object of Refuge, it has both the
vipassana and the shamatha. And then you take refuge; at the end of the Refuge,
what happens? Object of Refuge dissolves into you; see ‘refugee’ yourself and the
object of Refuge become inseparable. That’s the vipassana, that’s the non-duality
that is completely different from ego – that’s the vipassana.

So likewise all the path is designed to DISORGANIZE – chaos, right chaos.
Chogyam Trungpa Rinpoche has such a good term; he calls it ‘orderly chaos’
mandala. The whole concept of mandala is basically a chaos. You are creating a
chaos. When you are practising the sadhana, all you are doing is creating chaos
because your impure perception is so organized. They have, they’re really
organized, scheduled-wise, what do you call it? They are so; notes, eh, calendar,
task, eh, reminder, alarm clock, schedules; everything’s so organized - all this
impure perception.
The moment the sadhana is applied, impure perception, organized impure
perception is now becoming chaotic, and that’s the mandala you see. Anyway this is
a brief introduction to experiential perception, the second perception.
Now the third; do we have enough time? Yeah, anyway the third is very short. As I
told you – cannot, cannot talk this one. This is pure perception you see. Pure
perception is BEYOND US. It’s as I said how you would have, how would an
enlightened being see or how would an enlightened being have what kind of
perception.
If an enlightened reaches here today, will he see things like this? Will he still go to
hawker centre and have to go through the burden of choosing, going round and
which one is good and which one is not good? Enlightened being, what does, what
does that mean? Enlightened being means someone who has no ego, no pride, no
jealousy, no attachment, NONE of these emotions. Sure we can only guess, we can
only do the guess job, okay.
See when someone who loves durian, durian is it? Durian, looks at the durian, even
the shape of the durian is beautiful. That’s why some of them even went so far to
design a house (laughter) that looks like yeah. But for some of us, those who hate
durians, can’t stand it, right - so dualistic perception, dualistic perceptions.
Now I wonder someone who has no dualistic, dualistic mind is offered a durian, what
kind of perception will he have, will she have? Oh does, is he or she? No, he is
beyond he and she; this is why always in the sadhana also; like if you are reading
the sadhana - Vajra Nairatmya, the consort of the Hevajra, is not other than him,
right. We are not talking about transvestites though, okay; transsexuals, you know

transsexuals, we’re not talking about transsexuals by the way. We are talking about
beyond male and female, beyond dualistic.
So this is what I mean yesterday like if you are asking me whether I want to achieve
enlightenment? Seriously I don’t think so. You know why? Because most of us, do
you why? Most of us when we say enlightenment; we want to achieve enlightenment
– all we want is a slightly better life than what we have – no need to work, maybe six
days of holiday, one day working; maybe no need. That we can take leave
(laughter), eh, no need, no. no red lights in the traffic, I don’t know eh, sofa seat that
can be turned into a bathtub with one press of button, all kinds of things. This is what
we are imagining, isn’t it? Really this is how it is.
THE THREE LEVELS OF PERCEPTION
TEACHING ON THE THREE (SNANG GSUM) OF THE SAKYAPA
(Singapore 2003) by Dzongsar Jamyang Khyentse Rinpoche … 47/48
You know I will tell you. You know we read sutras and then in our minds, we
compose a suffering of samsara, intellectual samsara. And then we read sutras and
we compose an intellectual nirvana, okay. Now there is a real samsara and there is a
real nirvana. So we Buddhists we are trying to abandon the intellectual samsara and
trying to achieve the intellectual nirvana. And we are not even one inch we’re going
to give up the real samsara and we don’t even think about the real nirvana because
real nirvana is beyond our emotions, really.
Our, you know like for one thing if I’m enlightened, I will never be able to enjoy a
football match (laughter) because since an enlightened being, I know everything
instantly what has happened in the past, present and in the future INSTANTLY. So
the whole point of a football match is ‘who’s going to score first?’ (Laughter) Who’s
going to win? That’s our so-called FUN, isn’t it? The fun, 99.99.99 percent of our fun
is gone during the enlightenment (laughter) because so-called fun in our lives is

usually a product of our insecurity like a detective film. You watch a detective film.
You enjoy it JUST because you don’t know what’s happening until the end.
And the relationship is like that. We have a relationship. You know the whole
relationship, boyfriend-girlfriend, boyfriend-boyfriend, girlfriend-girlfriend relationship
– I am trying to be politically correct by the way (laughter). All these relationships; do
you know relationships work, do you know how the relationship works? Because
there is an insecurity. As long as there is an insecurity relationship works. So if you
ever find someone who is a little insecure about their boyfriend or girlfriend, tell them
– Ah, its working (laughter). Now you have a relationship, really.
If one of them has no insecurity, relationship won’t work. Let’s say you have a
girlfriend who doesn’t care what you do, right. You can go around with like, you can
even sleep with an elephant (laughter), she doesn’t care. She doesn’t care and
suddenly what do you think, you think? You feel very bad because you think she
doesn’t love you, right. This is how human mind is. She’s giving you a freedom but
you think she doesn’t care. We want her to be jealous. We want her to be
possessive but not too much, a little bit (laughter). A LITTLE bit, only a little bit; if too
much, suffocating.
So all everything so-called fun is actually based on insecurity. Like drinking coffee,
like smoking cigarette, like a drill you know and don’t think that you are an exception.
Really you are not exception. If you are not an enlightened being, none of us are
exceptions.
THE THREE LEVELS OF PERCEPTION
TEACHING ON THE THREE (SNANG GSUM) OF THE SAKYAPA
(Singapore 2003) by Dzongsar Jamyang Khyentse Rinpoche … 48/48

Since I’m, I’m such a, you know film, movie-buff; you know I watch a lot of films. And
ONE film that really haunted me; actually it really created some depression. Really I
am serious. It really depressed me for months, even now when I think of it
sometimes it takes me to some kind of depression. I couldn’t eat for days; I couldn’t
think of things and that one movie is ‘Deer Hunter’. I don’t know whether you have
seen this, the film called ‘Deer Hunter’. Robert De Niro is acting there and that film
really stunned me for years.
There’s a scene where they play Russian roulette. Remember Russian roulette, one
bullet in the pistol and they shoot. It’s, it’s betting basically and then you bet that you
will not get killed. And then you count and then you shoot yourself. One of them, you
know there’s two people in, in the, when you play this game; and whoever gets shot
is lost. Such a bad, daring game during the Vietnam War and there’s an American
soldier – he was forced to play this game by the Viet Cong. And he has been so
lucky; every time he shoot, empty right, blank, so he always wins. Years later you
know when the War is ended, he is still in Vietnam doing this, out of his will. Why?
Because he is so attached to this thrill of not being shot.
And the reason why it made me depressed is I was thinking - I have the complete
tendency, tendency like him. I can do this. I can see myself doing the Russian
roulette and getting addicted to this. Really it’s amazing, it really scared me. I was so
scared that I have the whole tendency for liking such a game, for loving or getting
addicted to such a game, thrill, thrilling, such a thrill. So this could, this kind of thing
can happen. Anyway I’m not supposed to talk about this kind of depressing things.
I’m supposed to talk about the pure perception (laughter).
Pure perception is basically a perception that is perceived without any dualistic mind.
So all we could do is guess. At the moment we can say we, we have a name,
beautiful name. It’s called (Tibetan phrase) - jnanas and kayas, bodies, dimensions
and the wisdom; so how they look like – we don’t know. And I am the last person you
should be asking.
Well we have managed to kill our time. So that’s about all. Please those who are
interested in the practice, keep practicing like this long and short, both ways. And
spiritual practice is VERY EASY; it’s a matter of thinking. It’s not a matter of
chanting. Try to incorporate your spiritual thinking in your day-to-day life, really. Drink
a cup of cappuccino. As it travels from your mouth and through the throat, and as it
lands here – think that actually is worthy of a celebration, because it could have not
happened. Moment by moment we can appreciate our life. If you look at a beautiful

flower; suddenly a beautiful butterfly’s flying you see, amazing. Appreciate that, dwell
in that moment. And that’s how you incorporate your life and, and the spiritual life.
Dwell in the present, not to the past – no use, gone. Don’t dwell too much on the
future – no use, it’s not under your control. Basically the ONLY thing that you can
control is this whatever you have – this moment. Past you can’t control, future you
can’t control. What you can control is what you have RIGHT NOW, this minute. And
how do you control? Not with chanting mantras, not with binding them with your
rosary but by just looking at it and appreciating it. That’s it and happy to see you, and
I hope to see you again soon. (Applause)
THE END
(transcribed from audio recording ‘THE THREE LEVELS OF PERCEPTION (SNANG
GSUM’) … Singapore 2003)
by Dzongsar Jamyang Khyentse Rinpoche
http://www.sakyatenphelling.org/buddhism/recorded-teachings/

Dedication of Merit –
ge war di yi nyur du dak Through this merit, may I quickly orgyen lama drub gyur ne Accomplish the level of the Oddiyana Lama and through that dro wa chik kyang ma lü pa May all beings, without exception, de yi sa la gö par shok Be established at that level.
