The Teacher, Health Professional, and Public Safety Housing Grant Program (THHP)
-
Upload
beatrice-paul -
Category
Documents
-
view
212 -
download
0
Transcript of The Teacher, Health Professional, and Public Safety Housing Grant Program (THHP)
The Teacher, Health Professional, and Public Safety Housing Grant Program
(THHP)
2
Key Points
SituationEligibilityAssessing NeedFundingSustainabilityResultsQuestions
3
Situation
Issues50% graduation rate from high school
Inexperienced educators Students just don’t care anymore
Health workers cannot locate in communities, created hotlineLaw enforcement are on their own
Zero Vacancy or Poor Housing Conditions1960s and 1970sDeteriorating Inadequate (kitchens, plumbing)
4
Situation
Cost of New Construction$450-$500/sq. ft. in most rural communities$650-$700/sq. ft. in Aleutians and above Arctic CircleSFH even more
Cost of development exceeds appraisalAnnual median household income (rural) $60KCost of living (triple)Rarely are there comps (or outdated)
Banks, on average, will loan about 10% of TDC
5
Situation
That’s where this program comes in, to fill the void with “Gap
Funding”
Total Development Cost - All other sources of funds = “Gap”
6
Eligibility
Grant ProgramFunds are Forgivable and in Loan form
Eligible entitiesNon-Profits, tax exempt, 501(c)3State EntitiesLocal Government (incorporated through the state)Tribal GovernmentSchool DistrictsHealth CorporationsNative CorporationsRegional Housing Authorities
ActivitiesAcquisition, Rehabilitation, New Construction, or mix
7
Assessing Need
Market ConditionsVacancy Rate – dictates activity Inadequate Housing RateMarket AffordabilityPersonnel without HousingTurnover RatePlanned or Ongoing Expansion
*Additional points are available through optional features
8
Funding
The program is primarily funded with State funds
State of Alaska General Fund $sRasmuson Foundation (private non-profit)THHP loans
9
Funding
Matching fundsCashIn-Kind (labor, materials)Conventional LoansOther grants
Partnerships Mixed Use Developments
10
Sustainability
Disaster Risk Mitigation and Resiliency5 star BEES minimum (AK State)
Reduces carbon footprintReduces operating costsEncouraging 5+ and 6* BEES
Partnership with DPS for CPTED
11
Sustainability
Local Labor PreferenceJob training program
Maintain qualified workforceReduce cost for maintenance and future developmentsMoney goes into local economies
12
Results
13
Results
101 developments over 11 years
418 units of housing
Reached 74 communities
Averaging 31% applicant matching funds
Reduced teacher turnover by 17%
Improved building designs and energy friendly technologies
Rehabilitating vacant housing, tightening market
14
Q&A
15
Development FeaturesImpact on Sustainability and the Community
To maximize the impact these developments have within a community, not only limited to housing professionals, but certain criteria have been established by AHFC which promotes responsible and sustainable housing developments. These elements include:
- 5 Star Energy Efficiency Rating/IECC with incentives for 5+ and 6 Star BEES Ratings- Energy Star Appliances- Renewable Energy Options- Mixed-Use Structures- Mixed-Professional Type Housing- Multi-Unit Preference- Fair Housing Accessibility (3+ units) and Section 504 (4+ units) Standards- Job Training Program- Local Hire Preference- Acquisition/Rehabilitation Preference- Crime Prevention through Environmental Design- Designs to mitigate natural disasters and to promote community resiliency
16
ImpactSuccess Stories
“It seems just about everyone ‘Outside’ heard the horror stories of freezing pipes, cold rooms, mold, and mildew in Alaska’s teacher housing in rural communities. Now we boast of having some of the best teacher housing in Alaska. Thanks to the new units, housing is no longer the major recruitment impediment it once was.”
- Jamie Stacks, Superintendent, Pribilof School District
“Before 18 new housing units were built in Kotzebue, the district had a difficult time retaining teachers, more than half of whom have families with them.”
- Dr. Norman Eck, Superintendent, Northwest Arctic Borough School District
17
Completed ProjectsFrom the Ground Up
Community
Total Units Total Cost
Teller 4 $1,129,861
18
Completed ProjectsFrom the Ground Up
Community Total Units Total Cost
Tanana Rehab 2 $301,888
19
Completed ProjectsFrom the Ground Up
Community Total Units Total Cost
Mountain Village
8 $2,665,666
20
Completed ProjectsFrom the Ground Up
Community Total Units Total Cost
Noatak Rehab 4 $866,214
21
Completed ProjectsFrom the Ground Up
Community Total Units Total Cost
St. Mary’s 3 $1,431,032
22
Completed ProjectsFrom the Ground Up
Community Total Units Total Cost
Manokotak 2 $758,293