Table of ContentsAbout the Author2Main theme of the book3SUMMARY4CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF BOOK14Conclusion:15

About the AuthorMian Ata Rabbani born in 1919 at Jalandhar, was an officer of Pakistan Air Force, who served as the Aide-de-camp (ADC) to Muhammad Ali Jinnah, the first Governor General and the founder of Pakistan. Ata is the father of Raza Rabbani, a senator of Pakistan Peoples Party. During the 1965 Indo Pak war, Rabbani was the commander of the Kohat Airbase, a non-operational air while going into provincial election in 1946 Muhammad Ali Jinnah, the leader of All-India Muslim League asked for donations. Rabbani who supported the party collected about 27,500 Rupees and handed over to Jinnah when he was at Calcutta to address an election rally at Calcutta's Miadan. Jinnah while giving him the receipt advised "Don't do it again. You know you could be court martialed for it and even dismissed from the air force; and I want you to stay on in the air force." The same year Rabbani was posted to the Indian Air Training Corps, Alig Once the creation of Pakistan was announced, Rabbani opted to join Pakistan Air Force in 1947. He was selected as ADC to the first Governor General and founder of Pakistan, Muhammad Ali Jinnah. He joined his assignment on 7 August 1947 when he accompanied Jinnah on his journey from New Delhi to Karachi. Rabbani continued as a personal staff of Jinnah after the independence of Pakistan on 14 August 1947, till he was relieved by Jinnah on the request of the then Commander in Chief of Pakistan Air Force Allan Perry-Keene and proceeded to the Flying Training School at Risalpur as a Flying Instructor in 1948.In 1950 he was transferred to Lahore as President PAF Selection Board and when the board was merged with Inter Services Selection Board, he acted as Deputy President. He was given the command of PAF Base Lahore in 1953. He was appointed Deputy Martial Law Administrator of Lahore in the 1958 military coup. He died at the age of 90 in June 2012 at Karachi and is buried at Army graveyard in Karachi. He was also writer of the following books I Was the Quaid's Aide-De-Camp, My ears in Blue Uniform (1941-1966), Jinnah: A Political Saint. Jinnah: Through My Eyes and witness to Political History of Pakistan.

Main theme of the bookMr Jinnah was an extra ordinary statesman and unique in his political sagacity. He was political saint to the muslim of the subcontinent. However he was not infallible and made three mistakes as governor general of Pakistan which has far reaching consequences the book describes the quagmire of political history of Pakistan with particular reference to democracy its first PM was assassinated and another one hanged ,political coups, counter coups, musical chair and finally military coups. American convulsions in there attitude towards Pakistan and their growing closeness to India. The situation on the ground level at present is dismal but there is no cause for despair , Pakistan has withstood such storm earlier and this will also blow over. The panacea for all the ills of Pakistan is still to be find .And when we find the solution of this problem the sun shall rise again INSHALLAH

SUMMARY

KT your PART n when you will compile da report then kindly send me da copy of this report as well

General Zia Ul Haq (1977-1988)General Muhammad Zia-ul-Haq was the one who enforced Martial Law for the third time in the brief history of Pakistan. - On April 1, 1976, in a surprise move the then Prime Minister of Pakistan, Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto, appointed Zia-ul-Haq as Chief of Army Staff, superseding five senior Generals. Bhutto probably wanted somebody as the head of the armed forces who would not prove to be a threat for him, and the best available option was the simple General who was apparently interested only in offering prayers and playing golf. However, history proved that General Zia-ul-Haq proved to be much smarter than Bhutto thought. When political tension reached its climax due to the deadlock between Bhutto and the leadership of Pakistan National Alliance on the issue of general elections, Zia-ul-Haq took advantage of the situation.

On July 5, 1977, he carried out a bloodless coup overthrowing Bhuttos government and enforced Martial Law in the country. After assuming power as Chief Martial Law Administrator, Zia-ul-Haq promised to hold National and Provincial Assembly elections in the next 90 days and to hand over power to the representatives of the Nation. However, in October 1977, he announced the postponement of the electoral plan and decided to start an accountability process of the politicians. In a statement, he said that he changed his decision due to the strong public demand for the scrutiny of political leaders who had indulged in malpractice in the past. The Disqualification Tribunal was formulated and many former Members of Parliament were disqualified from participating in politics at any level for the next seven years. A white paper was also issued which criticized the activities of Pakistan People Partys government under Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto With the retirement of Fazal Ilahi, Zia-ul-Haq also assumed the office of President of Pakistan on September 16, 1978. In the absence of a Parliament, Zia-ul-Haq decided to set up an alternative system. He introduced Majlis-i-Shoora in 1980. Most of the members of the Shoora were intellectuals, scholars, ulema, journalists, economists and professionals belonging to different fields of life. The Shoora was to act as a board of advisors to the President. The idea of establishing this institution was not bad but the main problem was that all 284 members of the Shoora were to be nominated by the President and thus there was no room for dissention. In the mid 80s, Zia-ul-Haq decided to fulfill his promise of holding elections in the country. But before handing over the power to the public representatives, he decided to secure his position. Referendum was held in the county in December 1984, and the masses were given the option to elect or reject the General as the future President of Pakistan. The question asked in the referendum was phrased in a way that Zia-ul-Haqs victory was related to the process of Islamization in the country. According to the official result, more than 95 percent of the votes were cast in favor of Zia-ul-Haq, thus he was elected as President for the next five years.After being elected President, Zia-ul-Haq decided to hold elections in the country in February 1985 on a non-party basis. Most of the political parties decided to boycott the elections but election results showed that many victors belonged to one party or the other. To make things easier for himself, the General nominated the Prime Minister from amongst the Members of the Assembly. To many, his nomination of Muhammad Khan Junejo as the Prime Minister was because he wanted a simple person at the post who would act as a puppet in his hands. Before handing over the power to the new Government he made certain Amendments in the Constitution and got them endorsed from the Parliament before lifting the state of emergency in the county. Due to this Eighth Amendment in the Constitution, the powers of the President were increased to an absolute level on the plea of safeguarding national integrity. As time passed, the Parliamentarians wanted to have more freedom and power. By the beginning of 1988, rumors about the differences between the Prime Minister and Zia-ul-Haq were rife. The general feeling was that the President, who had enjoyed absolute power for eight long years, was not ready to share it with anybody else. On May 29, 1988, Zia-ul-Haq finally dissolved the National Assembly and removed the Prime Minister under article 58(2) b of the amended Constitution. Apart from many other reasons, Junejos decision to sign the Geneva Accord against the wishes of Zia-ul-Haq proved to be one of the major factors responsible for his removal.

After 11 years, Zia-ul-Haq once again made the same promise to the Nation to hold fresh elections within next 90 days. With Benazir Bhutto back in the country and the Muslim League leadership annoyed with the President over the decision of May 29, Zia-ul-Haq was trapped in the most difficult situation of his political life. The only option left for him was to repeat history and to postpone the elections once again. However, before taking any decision, Zia-ul-Haq died in an air crash near Bhawalpur on August 17, 1988. The accident proved to be very costly for the country as almost the entire military elite of Pakistan was onboard. Though United States Ambassador to Pakistan was also killed in the misfortune, yet many do not rule out U. S. involvement in the sabotage. They believe that United States could not afford Pakistan to oppose Geneva Accord and thus they removed the biggest hurdle in their way. During his rule, Zia-ul-Haq tried his utmost to maintain close ties with the Muslim World. He made vigorous efforts along with other Muslim States to bring an end to the war between Iran and Iraq. Pakistan joined the Non-Aligned Movement in 1979 during Zia-ul-Haqs term. He also fought a war by proxy in Afghanistan and saved Pakistan from a direct war with Soviet Union. The major event in the history of zia regime was its ismalization ,debacle in siachin ,ojheri camp blown up and the global scenario of soviet infiltration in afganistan.

Emergence And Eclipse Of Ghulam Ishaq Khan A powerful player in the political equation was President Ishaq Khan. The president, under the constitution, is elected by a majority of the members of the national and provincial assemblies. Ishaq Khan was a seasoned senior bureaucrat-turned politician who had been a key figure in Pakistan for more than three decades. Born in 1915 in the North-West Frontier Province, he was appointed to the prestigious Civil Service of Pakistan after independence in 1947. After holding various regional posts, including being chairman of the West Pakistan Water and Power Development Authority (1961-66), he was appointed to several positions in the central government--first as secretary, Ministry of Finance (1966-70) and later as governor of the State Bank of Pakistan (1971-75). In the latter position, he questioned the wisdom of a number of the economic policies of then Prime Minister Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto. He was subsequently moved from the bank and made secretary general at the Ministry of Defence. Although an unusual post for a senior economics expert, it proved to be fortuitous in that it brought him into close contact with the senior officers of the armed forces. Among them was General Zia, who later ousted Bhutto and turned the management of the economy over to Ishaq Khan. During the martial law period (1977- 85), Ishaq Khan's titles changed, but he was responsible for all important economic decisions. Among other things, he supported the Zia government's efforts to Islamize the economy by changes in the fiscal and banking systems.

In 1985 Ishaq Khan was elected to the Senate and later became chairman of the Senate. The death of Zia in 1988 thrust Ishaq Khan to the center of the political stage. When the military decided to use the constitution to handle the issue of succession, Ishaq Khan, as chairman of the Senate and therefore next in the line of succession, became acting president. He and the emergency council he instituted decided to hold general elections and to allow political parties to participate. Thus, the country was guided back to democracy, Benazir became prime minister, and Ishaq Khan was subsequently elected president by the national and provincial assemblies.

Ishaq Khan's position was considerably strengthened by the Eighth Amendment to the constitution, introduced by President Zia, which allows the president to dismiss the government and to override the government's choice of army chief. When the previous army chief died unexpectedly, President Ishaq Khan reportedly turned down the government's choice and named General Abdul Waheed to head the army. General Waheed, who is not known to have any political ambitions, is from the same ethnic group as Ishaq Khan--the Pakhtuns of the North-West Frontier Province.

Intermittent and conflicting signals of rapprochement, realignment, and behind-the-scenes alliances among the various political players heightened the political tension in late 1992 and early 1993. There was speculation that the opposition and the government might join forces to muster a two-thirds majority in the parliament to repeal the Eighth Amendment or even that they might field a candidate against the president. However, it was also noticeable that Benazir had stopped openly attacking the president, and some observers considered that she might be playing for time, hoping to use the differences between the president and the prime minister to her own advantage. The army, however, always a key ingredient in the mix, continued to support the president as well as the continuation of the Eighth Amendment. Against this backdrop, Pakistan's developing democracy continued to be tested by economic problems, persistent violence, and corruption, as well as the power struggles of its leaders.

Leghari Plays Brutus What made leghari brutus ?what was it that made him sacrifice his political ideology ,his comrades of 20 years and years of stuggle together to part company with fellow jialas? Farooq Leghari was elected Senator. In the 1977 election, he won the National Assembly seat from his ancestral constituency in Dera Ghazi Khan and was appointed Federal Minister for Production. In 1978, he was appointed Secretary General of the P. P. P. and participated in the struggle for the restoration of democracy. He remained Secretary General till 1983 and underwent four years of imprisonment during the Martial Law. Farooq Leghari was elected member of both National and Punjab Assembly in the 1988 elections, and was appointed Federal Minister for Water and Power from December 1989 up to August 1990.

In October 1990 elections, he was re-elected member of the National Assembly and became Deputy Leader of the Opposition in the Assembly. In the caretaker Cabinet in 1993, Farooq Leghari held the portfolio of the Federal Minister for Finance. During this period he presided over the 21st Islamic Conference of Foreign Ministers held in Karachi from April 25 to 29,1993. In the October 1993 general elections, he won the National Assembly seat and was appointed Federal Foreign Minister. Farooq Ahmad Khan Leghari was elected President of Pakistan on November 13, 1993, and took oath the same day for a term of five years. In February 1997, Mian Nawaz Sharif, a major political opponent of Farooq Leghari, was elected as the Prime Minister. With the passing of the Thirteenth Amendment, a direct collision course with the Prime Minster was set. Due to the dilution of Pakistan Peoples Partys role in the assemblies, chances of Legharis reelection as President in 1998 had also become bleak. On December 2, 1997, Farooq Leghari resigned as the President of Pakistan. As scheduled, elections were held on February 3, 1997. Pakistan Muslim League won with an overwhelming majority with absolutely light and slight opposition. The Muslim League was able to obtain a two-third majority in the National Assembly and Mian Nawaz Sharif was re-elected as Prime Minister. He obtained a vote of confidence from the National Assembly on February 18, 1997.

A number of very important Constitutional Amendments were introduced during Nawaz Sharifs second term. These include the termination of the Eighth Amendment, passing of the Thirteenth Amendment and the Ehtesab Act, 1997. Nawaz Sharif faced a serious confrontation with the Judiciary and the Executive, which eventually led to the resignation of President Leghari on December 2, 1997.

It was during this term that Pakistan carried out its nuclear tests on May 28, 1998, in response to the Indian detonation of its five nuclear devices. The Nawaz Government had found it imperative for Pakistan to carry out these nuclear tests, in order to provide an effective defense, and to deter Indian adventurism.

The Nawaz Government proclaimed an emergency on May 28, 1998; the day these nuclear tests were conducted. All fundamental rights were suspended and all the foreign currency accounts in Pakistani banks were frozen. On August 28, 1998, Nawaz regime introduced the Fifteenth Amendment. The Bill generated heated debate throughout the country but was passed on October 9, 1998, by the members of the National Assembly. The Bill, however, was not put before the Senate within 90 days as was required by the Constitution. The Bill was held back, as Nawaz Sharif did not had the required two-third majority in the Senate.

The Fifteenth Amendment was presumed to be an effort by Nawaz Sharif to acquire additional powers for himself. Soon a serious conflict and confrontation emerged on the scene between him and the Military Generals. This confrontation led to the resignation of General Jehangir Karamat on October 7, 1998. General Karamat was replaced by General Pervez Musharraf.

The Kargil Operation in its aftermath again led to tense relations between Nawaz Sharif and the armed forces. This tension culminated into the removal of Nawaz Government by General Pervez Musharraf on October 12, 1999, thus bringing to an end the second term of Nawaz Sharifs Government.12 October 1999 Military takeover Pakistani politics took yet another twist in October 1990 when General Pervez Musharraf ousted the PML (N) government headed by Nawaz shareef. Hence again martial law imposed in this countryPakistan not a failed statePakistan is being bracketed among the failed states of the world .but Pakistan is not a failed state. Let it be known loud and clear to the world that Pakistan is not a failed state .Pakistan is a nuclear power, with missiles in its armory, has an impregnable defense with the seventh largest and one of the finest army in the world, well stocked foreign exchange and indispensable geo-strategic location in this region with this combination of assets, Pakistan cannot be a failed state. The author throws up some recommendation and few suggestions as food for thought for the betterment of the country which is as follow: Democracy, Restoration of 1973 constitution, Trained and experienced specialist in various fields is not available in Pakistan, Restrict by law the number of member of the federal and provisional cabinets, Visit to holy places including for hajj and Umra, Number of political parties , Independent and strong judiciary, Stop misuse of public money, Legislator who change party loyalties be debarred , Accountability, depoliticize state institutions and restore inter provisional cohesion.

Pakistan And Its Objectives

Countries that matter in the world, have objectives based on their national interest that they aim to safeguard .these objectives are firm and are not negotiable. Matter like personal friendship are not allowed to influence the realities .keeping their objectives in view the relations with other countries and region are formulated.so the basic for Pakistan are that it should stand on its own feet And think and act independently. So the question arises that what should be Pakistans objectives? Pakistan first is rhetoric but it require more than that to stand up and be counted. Pakistan should have a clear and unambiguous understanding of what is required to be achieved. And once these objectives are identified, these must be kept in view all the time as our bible. Government may come and go but objectives should stay firm as the Himalayas. Pakistan objectives broadly speaking can be listed as follows. National security, Nuclear technology, Literacy, Dams, Revival of economy and restore investors confidence, Judiciary, Swift and across the board accountability, Foreign relation and Democratization.

There is no prefix to democracy ,it is pure and simple democracy ,as envisaged and practiced in the democratic countries all over the world .in Pakistan seizing power by unconstitutional means by the army and unscrupulous power hungry civilians ,bureaucrats and politician included ,it is a matter of routine .in order to put to an end to it, the relevant clause of punishment for extra-constitutional acts for grabbing power as laid down in the constitution must be strictly enforced and implemented.

Charter Of Democracy

The 60 year of history of Pakistan, particularly after assassination of its first prime minister, is a quagmire of politics. Personalities rather than constitution and the objectives to be achieved by Pakistan, were prominent and held the center stage. During the period from December 1988 till October 1999 the personalities of MS Benazir Bhutto and mian Nawaz Sharif dominated in the political stage in the name of PPP and PML (n) respectively. But for the restoration of democracy the two party leaders signed a charter with the name of charter of democracy for the restoration of democracy in a country. The charter of democracy contains 36 clauses divided into 4 distinct sections. Broadly speaking these are Constitutional amendment, code of conduct, free and fair election a civil military relations. Although the charter of democracy is not be a prefect document, as one seldom is, and there is always room for improvement. The charter of is a statement of established principles of constitutional law with 2 additions. Acceptance of the due role of opposition and others; that neither of the parties shall undermine each other through extra-constitutional ways. The charter of democracy has risen in a crisis when once again Pakistan is at the crossroads of its democratic history .but in Pakistan present political confusion it shall go a long way as a code of ethics and help in pulling the country out of this political morass. The document of democracy is worth giving a trial at least.

India As A Sixth Nuclear Power State

Here comes the news in 2006 that India and America is for sure that Indian figures first to the US in all and every aspect and they hasten to grab the opportunity to bind India into knot that US call American most dynamically developing alliance. The US has decided to allow India to acquire the same status, facilities, benefits and advantage as accorded to the five member of the nuclear club. This amounts to virtually recognizing Indian as a member of the nuclear club. Now America no longer brackets Pakistan with India. During this period US offer F 16 Falcons to Pakistan and at the same time made a counter offer to India assuring its leader of to help India in emerge as a world power soon. As the part of the plan the US offered New Delhi f-18 hornets aircraft technology and license to manufacture those in India .this US offer to India is much more substantial and of the strategic value than mere sale of f-16 to Pakistan. Now India is not going to be foolish to fritter away such an alluring offer, it may drag its feet to bargain for something more because with this deal going through India would not only enhance its superiority many folds over Pakistan but will dominate the entire region. India has always been USA first choice in the region and Pakistan is only a standby .the ground realities present a dismal picture. Pakistan is beset with unpleasant realities ;starting with overwhelming US overtures to win over India; US perception of India in terms of strategic partner and the role it is likely to be assigned in furthering US interest in the region; rapidly developing US Israel and India axis ;transfer of technology and production rights of f 16 in India that will in long run make Pakistan dependents on India for spare parts for its jets. Pakistan US relationships has always been a matter of convenience; US has only tactical interest in Pakistan and on the job to job basis. At present it centers around the war on terror and once this situation recedes then the love lore between the two will once again come to an end.

The New Middle East Of George Bush And Sultan Salah Uddin AyubiIndia and Pakistan are two different countries.an article blood border by ralph peters published in US armed journal reflects the thinking of a section of the American establishment, arguing I favor of redrawing the border in the middle east to facilitate implementation of bush administration neoliberalism agenda in this region. This highly provocative article rings bell and takes back to readers to bush revelation that India and Pakistan are two different countries. This article by ralph peter caant be brushed aside it provides an important link in the chain of gradually preparing the countries of this region and the world at large to assimilate and later accept the changing boundaries of the same state and the creation of the new states in the middle east at the cost of the existing states including turkey ,iran and even Pakistan. Even dr Condoleezza pronounced about the new Middle East and calling the recent Lebanon pounding by Israel as the birth pangs of that scheme.it was being covertly planned but bush being what he is , just could not contain himself and he first come out with crusade against the terrorist statement and most recently dubbed the Muslim fascist. It is an organized global campaign against Muslim at large to defame and isolate them in the first instance and then confront them with redefining the boundaries of various Muslim countries in the Middle East so as to make them totally ineffective and dependent on the USA .in this game turkey Iran and Pakistan are also include. It is considered that Pakistan Iran Iraq Saudi Arabia and turkey are unnatural states requiring major adjustment in their borderies.it is felt by US that Britain and France after World War 2 in the 2oth century, made mistakes and created countries with unnatural border and this historical mistake be rectified now to save further bloodshed. The concept of the new Middle East and regional Muslim states is conceived to create militarily and financially weak states that they toe the American line and not to resist Israel domination in the region. For the short term gains this Anglo Christian axis is likely to have sway because they have both military resources and a powerful media to force their will. Bush crusade against Muslims fascist will change the very face of this region but they should not forget that there is always salahuddin ayubi waiting in the wings. In the end here have been many intriguing developments, near and around with the deep and far reaching repercussions for Pakistan, south Asia and the middle east .The whole scenario in these region is undergoing a change and as a part of the region, is in a quagmire of US/European manipulation of the economic, political and strategic new look of these regions. Newly developed indo-US love hate relationship is no surprise to Pakistan .since independent of the subcontinent in 1947; the US has been wooing india for strategic and economic reasons but with no success. India stuck to its relationships with soviets. Pakistan was only a second choice and the American used it as a standby. Someone has beautifully summed it up. The US treats Pakistan as a girlfriend for a rainy day. This is no secret. After their failure to lure India to their camp the Americans repeatedly bought Pakistan cooperation through economic and military aid, to meet their objectives in south Asia and Middle East. The deals were on task to task basis with no obligation outstanding. It may be noted that even in these strictly business like dealing with Pakistan the American always kept an admiring eye on India and they always made sure that while giving military aid to Pakistan it did not irk India and only equipped Pakistan armed forces with weapons which didnt have any offensive capability.one more point to be noted at this stage is that in the past the term used for the violation of Pakistani territory by US said as infringement of Pakistans sovereignty but now it has been mellowed down to such words as violation of international border. The real American thinking on dealing with al-Qaeda and Talibans and their disregard for Pakistan sovereignty is revealed. American is known to be ruthless in achieving their ends. Here there objectives is complete annihilation of al Qaeda and to achieve this, they would trample over anything and everything that come their including Pakistan sovereignty.

Now Pakistan is no more than a subservient state at the beck and call of the US, rightly termed as girlfriend for a rainy day. Now a stage is reached where bold and brave action on the part of the decision maker is required, not a belligerent action but a firm and diplomatic indicating Pakistans resolve to stand up on its own without any fear of sanctions or threaten to be bombed back to the stone ages . Pakistan is a nuclear power and the USA will not go to that extent. That is for sure. Pakistan all along had been toeing the American line, may be out of compulsion for need of pelf in the form of economic and military aid or for fear of being bombed back to the stone age but it is now high time for rulers of Pakistan, be they Politicians, bureaucrats or uniformed to rethink and be bold to face the challenges including the very existence of the country. It will be now or never, because the coming times there are crucial as the eye of the storm is fast moving towards Pakistan and there may be not a second chance.

Pakistan leadership will have to think of Pakistan first forsaking their personal lust for power and the mistakes of the past must not be repeated. It may be unpalatable for ambitious power seeker but this is the only way for us and our coming generation to live up with honor.God will help us . THE SUN SHALL RISE AGAIN. INSHALLAH

CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF BOOK

Strength First time identify mistakes made by Mr. Jinnah. Pakistan political ups and downs is very well defined A compelling story, plainly told. It reveals a great deal about Pakistani life and politics. Leadership crisis issue in Pakistan political system is very well recognized. Weakness Author was a pro-Bhutto and pro-Jinnah. So his analysis was based on too much partiality. Highly criticized military era of Pakistan instead of assessing the main issue in political system. Media emergence and its impact in our political system is not identified. Media is now considered as a fourth pillar of state .consequently role of media play during all these year is not acknowledged. Personality flaws identified rather than system flaws. Many political and military personality errors and mistakes have been highlighted in the book but the reality is that people in all the places are same .Its not a person but its a political system which makes them corrupt. However we need a stable and best political and governance system which can provide solution to our problems. Democracy solution of all Pakistan problems. But the reality is that democracy itself is a cause of many problems. If author has a global perspective then he came to know that many problem also exist in countries in which democracy is prevailing .at this moment we need to think little outside the box for solving our issues.

Conclusion:The book initially provides a brief overview about political situation of Pakistan. According to the author of the book Pakistan is a developing country and it is politically unstable. He identified that democratic governments have always failed to complete their tenure which eventually results in a long lasting dictatorship reign. In Pakistani politics, there is a clear domination by few families only and these families have never produced long lasting fruitful results. The political system has been stagnant since 70s and no drastic change has taken place. The chair of head of state has been a war between the head of the army staff and a few noticeable political leaders. The situation on the ground level at present is gloomy but there is no cause for despair , Pakistan has withstood such storm earlier and this will also blow over. The panacea for all the ills of Pakistan is still to be find .Besides when we find the solution of this problem the sun shall rise again INSHALLAH17