The Study of Large Equipments Condition Maintenance Policy Based on Kalman Filtering
Transcript of The Study of Large Equipments Condition Maintenance Policy Based on Kalman Filtering
![Page 1: The Study of Large Equipments Condition Maintenance Policy Based on Kalman Filtering](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022020616/5750959b1a28abbf6bc34317/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
The Study of Large Equipments Condition Maintenance Policy
based on Kalman Filtering
Shuai Zhang 1, a, Jian Zhang 2, b, Shuiguang Tong 3, c, Chaowei Wu 4, d
1~4Institute of Thermal Science and Power Engineering, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou;310027,
China
[email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected]
Key words: PHM; Kalman Filtering; Reliability Estimation; Condition Based Maintenance
Abstract. Aimed at the problem that because common proportional hazards model (PHM) cannot
fuse new failure data of long-life complex equipment, which features a small-sample, the reliability
estimation accuracy will decline, a new condition-based maintenance strategy based on dynamic
PHM was proposed. Kalman filtering theory was adopted to fuse in-time new failure data and
expand sample size. Extended Kalman filtering method was used to solve the nonlinearity of the
observation equation of PHM and then its regression coefficient was online updated, according to
which the residual life was estimated and the optimal maintenance decision was made. Finally, the
condition monitoring data and historic operation data of a certain kind of wind power gearbox were
used to validate this method. The result indicates that this method has good dynamic estimation
ability under the condition of small sample with a 20.6% increase in the accuracy of regression
coefficient estimation and a 8.7% decrease in optimal preventive maintenance interval estimation
error.
0 Introduction
The reliability estimation accuracy during the operation period of mechanical equipment
determines the downtime and maintenance cost. It is difficult to obtain a lot of failure data in a short
term, so adopting classical probability theory cannot obtain satisfied reliability estimation accuracy.
Due to comprehensive consideration of performance parameters, failure types and maintenance
history data, CBM is becoming the main method in maintenance decision. The existing CBM
method can fuse condition monitoring data into reliability estimation, but reliability estimation can
not be able to take advantage of these new failure data. The small sample problem of historical
failure data can’t be resolved radically [1,2]. Therefore, reliability estimation accuracy during
operation period is becoming a bottleneck of improving the equipment safety and economy.
Regression coefficient in PHM based on weibull distribution is generally estimated by
maximum likelihood method and least square method. These methods based on a great sample data
are static parameter estimation methods. For reliability estimation of complex equipment, which has
a long design life and small sample characteristic, these methods have defects in parameter
estimation accuracy, information fusion ability and self-learning ability. In this paper based on
CBM method, kalman filter was adopted to fuse new failure data into PHM, expanding the sample
size of failure data, and eventually reducing the influence of small sample on reliability estimation
accuracy. In order to eliminate the nonlinearity of the measurement equation, EKF iterative
Advanced Materials Research Vols. 706-708 (2013) pp 2128-2132Online available since 2013/Jun/13 at www.scientific.net© (2013) Trans Tech Publications, Switzerlanddoi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.706-708.2128
All rights reserved. No part of contents of this paper may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means without the written permission of TTP,www.ttp.net. (ID: 131.151.244.7, Missouri University of Science and Technology, Columbia, United States of America-24/09/13,08:32:11)
![Page 2: The Study of Large Equipments Condition Maintenance Policy Based on Kalman Filtering](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022020616/5750959b1a28abbf6bc34317/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
algorithm was used to dynamic parameter estimation. Based on results of reliability estimation, the
optimal preventive maintenance interval of equipment was estimated and optimal maintenance
strategy was made. Finally, condition monitoring data and historical operating data of a certain
wind turbine gearbox were used to validate this method.
1. Kalman filter model based on PHM
1.1 Proportional Hazards Model.
PHM, which was used for joint covariant risk analysis, was proposed by Cox in 1972. Recently,
because it can consider the system internal state, the operating environment, the size of the load,
and the influence of historical running data on system life, PHM has become a research hotspot in
reliability field[3].
The basic idea of PHM considers that failure rate function of different individuals is
proportional to each other. A mathematical mapping between operating state parameters and failure
rate is estimated by PHM. The mathematical expression of PHM:
0( / ) ( ) exp( )h t h t= γγγγZ Z (1)
In the model, ( / )h t Z ——failure rate function
0 ( )h t ——basic failure rate function, only related to time
Z——covariate, reflecting the running state of the equipment
γγγγ ——regression coefficient, indicating the influence of covariate on failure rate
In the model, 1 1 2 2 n nZ Z Zγ γ γ= + + +�γγγγ Z .The weibull distribution function, which has strong
adaptability to three failure period of the product life "bathtub curve" and can fully reflect the
influence of material defects and stress concentration source on fatigue life, was used as basic
failure rate function. It has widely used for reliability analysis of mechanical equipment in
engineering practice. Generally, the weibull distribution function can be obtained in delivery test.
PHM based on weibull distribution [4]:
1( / ) ( ) exp( )t
h tββ
η η−= γγγγZ Z (2)
In the model, β —shape parameter of weibull distribution
η—scale parameter of weibull distribution
1.2 Parameter Estimation based on EKF.
The covariate Z, which is obtained by condition monitoring, contains the latest equipment
information. Regression coefficients can be estimated by using this information. With the constant
enlargement of sample data, γγγγ can be online updated. Considering γγγγ as state variable, Z as
observation variable, Kalman filtering model was established. In order to eliminate the influence of
different orders of magnitude between covariant data, "maximization processing" was used for
dimensionless condition monitoring data.
It is assumed that the estimated value of γγγγ is [ ]^
1 2( )n
k γ γ γ= �γγγγ at time k . A group of
covariates monitoring data [ ]1 2( )n
k Z Z Z= �Z was got, according to kalman filtering theory:
Advanced Materials Research Vols. 706-708 2129
![Page 3: The Study of Large Equipments Condition Maintenance Policy Based on Kalman Filtering](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022020616/5750959b1a28abbf6bc34317/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
^ ^
( ) ( 1) ( 1)k k k= − + −γ γγ γγ γγ γ w (3)
( / ) 1
( ) ln ( )( ) ( )
h tk k
h t k= +
γγγγZ
Z v (4)
Let ( )kg be( / ) 1
ln( ) ( )
h t
h t k
Z
γγγγ.
In the equation, ( 1)k −w and ( )kv represent Gaussian white noise added to the system. Their
mathematical expectations are both 0 and their covariance matrix are ( 1)k −Q and ( )kR respectively.
Obviously, γγγγ is nonlinear with Z in observation equation. In order to meet the linear
requirement of kalman filtering, EKF was used for first order Taylor expansion in the optimal state.
( ) ( ( )) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( )k k k k k k
∧ ∧ = + − + Z g g vγγγγγ γ γγ γ γγ γ γγ γ γ (5)
Where ( )kgγγγγ is the Jacobian matrix of ( )kg
Gain matrix of Kalman filtering is:
T( 1) ( 1| ) ( 1)k k k k+ + + ×γγγγK = P g1
T( 1) ( 1| ) ( 1) ( 1)k k k k k−
+ + + + + γ γγ γγ γγ γg P g R (6)
Where ( 1| ) ( | ) ( )k k k k k+ = +P P Q , ( | )k kP is the predicted covariance matrix of influence
coefficient at time k . The filtering estimation equation:
( 1| +1) ( +1| ) ( +1)k k k k k
∧ ∧
+ = + ×γ γγ γγ γγ γ K ( 1) ( 1) ( 1| )k k k k
∧ + − + + γγγγ γγγγZ g (7)
The renewal equation of filtering covariance:
( 1| 1) ( 1| )k k k k+ + = + ×P P ( 1) ( 1)k k − + + I K gγγγγ (8)
2. CBM Policy based on Maximum Availability.
If we define the preventive maintenance cost asPMC , the corrective maintenance cost as
CMC ,
and the total cost of production asC , we can determine the optimal preventive maintenance interval
PMT so as to minimize the total cost of production per unit time.
The expectation of the total cost of production per unit time is represented by:
( )
( ) PM CMC C n tC
Et t
+= (9)
and ( )n t is the mean value of failure number in t.
1
0( ) ( ) exp( )
t un t du
ββη η
−= ∫ Zγγγγ (10)
According to equation (9), (10), the optimal preventive maintenance interval PMT can be got:
1
( 1) exp( )
PM
PM
CM
CT
C
β
ηβ
=
− Zγγγγ (11)
3. Experimental Verification
As typical large equipment, wind turbine gearbox generally has a design life of 20 years. It is
difficult to get a lot of failure data in a short term, so studying dynamic parameter estimation in the
case of small sample data is of great significance to reliability and life prediction.
In this paper, the W2000DF 50 Hz TCIII wind turbine gearbox in a certain wind farm is taken
as the research object and lubricating oil temperature (T) is selected as the condition monitoring
variable [5]. The weibull distribution function of this gearbox can be obtained in its delivery test
( 3.5301β = , 523.2544η = ). According to the 180 groups of historical operating data from April to
September in 2011, we got that the actual value of γγγγ was 0.30 and the actual gearbox optimal
preventive maintenance interval was 71.6d by using classical probability estimation method.
2130 Mechatronics and Intelligent Materials III
![Page 4: The Study of Large Equipments Condition Maintenance Policy Based on Kalman Filtering](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022020616/5750959b1a28abbf6bc34317/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Tab. 1 Dimensionless condition monitoring data state variable ten groups of new condition monitoring data
T 1.2901 1.1668 1.3459 1.3621 1.4187 1.3524 1.3522 1.3396 1.3661 1.3508
Tab. 2 Dimensionless historical operating data state variable ten groups of historical operating data
T 1.4035 1.2270 1.4235 1.1905 1.6529 1.2821 1.4286 1.5152 1.2821 1.4706
In order to verify the dynamic estimation ability of this method under the condition of small
sample, two methods were adopted to estimateγγγγ .Then we can calculate the optimal preventive
maintenance interval, according to the estimation results. Method 1: Ten groups of new condition
monitoring data (shown in table 1) were selected and thenγγγγ was online updated by adopting EKF.
Method 2: Ten groups of data (shown in table 2) were selected randomly from the 180 groups of
historical operating data and then γγγγ was estimated by classical probability method. In method 1,
measurement error existing in the condition monitoring and quantization error of non-linear
processing were respectively integrated into system noise Q and measurement noise R. In this
article 0.1Q = and 0.1R = . Initial value of state variables and prediction covariance have little effect
on the estimation results, because kalman filter always reach convergence. Assume
that 0.37=γγγγ , 1P = [6,7]. The estimation results of γγγγ and root mean square error obtained by two
methods are presented in Figs.1 and 2.
0.10
0.15
0.20
0.25
0.30
0.35
0.40
0.45
0.50
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
the sample number
the
esti
mat
ed v
alu
e o
f
reg
ress
ion
co
effi
cien
t
method 1
method 2
Fig.1 Dynamic estimation result of regression coefficient
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.06
0.07
0.08
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
the sample number
the r
oot
mean s
quare
err
or
method 1
method 2
Fig.2 Root mean square error between estimated value and actual value
As can be seen from fig.1, the initial value of γγγγ has little effect on estimation results. Even if
there are larger errors between initial value and actual value, estimation results can quickly
converge to actual value nearby after 10 EKF iterations. Although adopting method 2 can also
achieve parameter estimation, the estimation results are disordered divergence. In fig.2, by adopting
method 1, the root mean square errors between initial value and actual value decrease gradually
Advanced Materials Research Vols. 706-708 2131
![Page 5: The Study of Large Equipments Condition Maintenance Policy Based on Kalman Filtering](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022020616/5750959b1a28abbf6bc34317/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
with the increase of sample number. However, root mean square errors have no obvious decreased
trend by adopting method 2. When sample number is 10, the root mean square errors are 2.47% and
3.11% respectively and the accuracy of regression coefficient estimation is increased by 20.6%.
For this gearbox, the ratio of preventive maintenance cost to corrective maintenance cost is
1/300. According to the equation (11) and the estimation results ofγγγγ , the optimal preventive
maintenance interval can be got. The calculation results are 69.5d and 73.9d respectively and the
estimation error was reduced by 8.7%.
4. Conclusion
This paper presents a new condition-based maintenance strategy based on dynamic PHM. EKF
theory was adopted to update the regression coefficient in PHM. According to updated regression
coefficient, the optimal preventive maintenance interval can be calculated. The state monitoring
data and historic operation data of a certain kind of wind power gearbox were used to validate this
method. The result indicates that the accuracy of regression coefficient estimation increase by
20.6% and the optimal preventive maintenance interval estimation error decrease by 8.7%. So, the
suggested method has certain significance for large equipment reliability research.
Acknowledgments
This study was partially supported by science and technology Major projects of Zhejiang
province. We are grateful to the assistance of Jian Zhang, corresponding author of this paper, for his
assistance in the preparation and review of the manuscript.
References
[1] Liu Baoyou,Fang Youtong,Wei Jin-xiang,ect. Journal of Mechanical Engineering: 2006, 42(3):
30~35
[2] Guo Bizhu. Changsha: Central South University, 2011: 13~24
[3] Ding Feng,He Zhengjia,Zi Yanyang,ect. Journal of Mechanical Engineering: 2009, 45(12):
89~93
[4] Ling Dan. Chengdu:University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, 2010: 15~32
[5] Guo Peng,DAVID Infield,Yang Xiyun. Proceeding of the CSEE: 2011,31(32): 129~136
[6] Zhang Jian,Qiu Qingying,Wu Jianwei,ect. Journal of Zhejiang University: Engineering
Science, 2011,45(10): 1815~1820
[7] Pan Difu,Liu Hui, Li Yanfei. Power System Technology, 2008, 32(7):82~86.
2132 Mechatronics and Intelligent Materials III
![Page 6: The Study of Large Equipments Condition Maintenance Policy Based on Kalman Filtering](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022020616/5750959b1a28abbf6bc34317/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Mechatronics and Intelligent Materials III 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.706-708 The Study of Large Equipments Condition Maintenance Policy Based on Kalman Filtering 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.706-708.2128