The State of JavaScript 2017
64
@SachaGreif Rakuten Tech Conference 2017
-
Upload
rakuten-inc -
Category
Technology
-
view
54 -
download
3
Transcript of The State of JavaScript 2017
@SachaGreifRakuten Tech Conference 2017
The State of JS Survey
Background
My Résumé
2008 2012 2016
???
2008 2012 2016
???
Patternify
2008 2012 2016
???
2008 2012 2016
???
Discover Meteor
2008 2012 2016
???
JavaScript Fatigue
hackernoon.com/how-it-feels-to-learn-javascript-in-2016-d3a717dd577f
State of JS20172016
State of JS 20172016
Michael Rambeaubestof.js.org
Raphaël Benittenivo.rocks
A Few Stats
23,695Total Responses
2016 2017
+150%
23,695Total Responses
9,307
2016 2017
+150%
14’05Average Time
2016 2017
14’05Average Time
12’21
2016 2017
14’05
Lost Productivity
201623,695 � � 230 days
The Charts
MyAwesomeLibrary.js
0%
12.5%
25%
37.5%
50%
2016
42%
15%22%
11%10%
Never heardof it
Heard of it, but not interested
Heard of it, would like to learn
Has used it, would not use it again
Would use it again
MyAwesomeLibrary.js
0%
12.5%
25%
37.5%
50%
2016
42%
15%22%
11%10%
Never heardof it
Heard of it, but not interested
Heard of it, would like to learn
Has used it, would not use it again
Would use it again
Awareness
MyAwesomeLibrary.js
0%
12.5%
25%
37.5%
50%
2016
42%
15%22%
11%10%
Never heardof it
Heard of it, but not interested
Heard of it, would like to learn
Has used it, would not use it again
Would use it again
Interest
MyAwesomeLibrary.js
0%
12.5%
25%
37.5%
50%
2016
42%
15%22%
11%10%
Never heardof it
Heard of it, but not interested
Heard of it, would like to learn
Has used it, would not use it again
Would use it again
Satisfaction
Flavors
Never heardof it
Heard of it, but not interested
Heard of it, would like to learn
Has used it, would not use it again
Would use it again
ES62016
0
0.225
0.45
0.675
0.9
74%
1%21%
2%2%
Never heardof it
Heard of it, but not interested
Heard of it, would like to learn
Has used it, would not use it again
Would use it again
ES62017
0
0.225
0.45
0.675
0.987%
2%9%1%1%
2017
0
0.225
0.45
0.675
0.987%
2%9%1%1%
Never heardof it
Heard of it, but not interested
Heard of it, would like to learn
Has used it, would not use it again
Would use it again
TypeScript2016
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
21%
4%
39%34%
2%
Never heardof it
Heard of it, but not interested
Heard of it, would like to learn
Has used it, would not use it again
Would use it again
TypeScript2017
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
34%
6%
37%
22%
1%
2017
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
34%
6%
37%
22%
1%
Front-End
Never heardof it
Heard of it, but not interested
Heard of it, would like to learn
Has used it, would not use it again
Would use it again
React2016
0
0.15
0.3
0.45
0.6
53%
5%
32%
11%0%
Never heardof it
Heard of it, but not interested
Heard of it, would like to learn
Has used it, would not use it again
Would use it again
React2017
0
0.15
0.3
0.45
0.658%
4%
27%
11%0%
2017
0
0.15
0.3
0.45
0.658%
4%
27%
11%0%
Never heardof it
Heard of it, but not interested
Heard of it, would like to learn
Has used it, would not use it again
Would use it again
Vue2016
0
0.15
0.3
0.45
0.6
10%1%
33%34%23%
Never heardof it
Heard of it, but not interested
Heard of it, would like to learn
Has used it, would not use it again
Would use it again
Vue2017
0
0.15
0.3
0.45
0.6
20%
2%
51%
22%
5%
2017
0
0.15
0.3
0.45
0.6
20%
2%
51%
22%
5%
Never heardof it
Heard of it, but not interested
Heard of it, would like to learn
Has used it, would not use it again
Would use it again
AngularJS2016
0
0.125
0.25
0.375
0.5
30%34%
10%
26%
0%
Never heardof it
Heard of it, but not interested
Heard of it, would like to learn
Has used it, would not use it again
Would use it again
AngularJS2017
0
0.125
0.25
0.375
0.5
20%
41%
7%
32%
0%
2017
0
0.125
0.25
0.375
0.5
20%
41%
7%
32%
0%
Never heardof it
Heard of it, but not interested
Heard of it, would like to learn
Has used it, would not use it again
Would use it again
Angular.io2016
0
0.125
0.25
0.375
0.5
13%7%
36%43%
1%
Never heardof it
Heard of it, but not interested
Heard of it, would like to learn
Has used it, would not use it again
Would use it again
Angular.io2017
0
0.125
0.25
0.375
0.5
19%10%
26%
45%
1%
2017
0
0.125
0.25
0.375
0.5
19%10%
26%
45%
1%
Break!
- or - SimmerGlimmer
A fast and lightweight UI component library from the Ember.js team
- or - ReagentDetergent
A minimalistic ClojureScript interface to React.js
- or - ExcaliburDurandal
Single Page Apps Done Right
- or - IntellectCerebral
A state controller with its own debugger
Hard Mode!
- or - - or -SuperappHyperapp
1 KB JavaScript library for building frontend applications
Awesomeapp
- or - - or -ChachachaChoo
A 4kb framework for creating sturdy frontend applications
Chomp
- or - - or -MoonSun
A minimal, blazing fast UI library
Star
Game Over!
Data Layer
Never heardof it
Heard of it, but not interested
Heard of it, would like to learn
Has used it, would not use it again
Would use it again
Redux2016
0
0.125
0.25
0.375
0.5
34%
3%
41%
10%13%
Never heardof it
Heard of it, but not interested
Heard of it, would like to learn
Has used it, would not use it again
Would use it again
Redux2017
0
0.125
0.25
0.375
0.5
45%
5%
34%
10%6%
2017
0
0.125
0.25
0.375
0.5
45%
5%
34%
10%6%
Never heardof it
Heard of it, but not interested
Heard of it, would like to learn
Has used it, would not use it again
Would use it again
GraphQL2016
0
0.15
0.3
0.45
0.6
5%1%
45%
14%
35%
Never heardof it
Heard of it, but not interested
Heard of it, would like to learn
Has used it, would not use it again
Would use it again
GraphQL2017
0
0.15
0.3
0.45
0.6
12%1%
60%
10%18%
2017
0
0.15
0.3
0.45
0.6
12%1%
60%
10%18%
Random Comments
“
”It's a pleasure to take this survey.
You actually learn something as well.
“
”JavaScript used to be the bane of my
existence. It is not anymore. Good job JavaScript.
“
”\";drop table;
“
”JavaScript and its entire ecosystem should
die in an out of control, raging fire
“
”This survey makes me feel like a fossil. So
many things I never even heard of…
“
”
Reading last year's survey showed me what to focus on to stay sane.
I probably wouldn't still be doing JS if it wasn't for this survey.
One Last Number…
170mentions of the word “love” in comments !
Thanks!stateofjs.com
