The Stages and Progression of a Close and Romantic Relationship
-
Upload
albert-muya-muraya -
Category
Documents
-
view
29 -
download
0
Transcript of The Stages and Progression of a Close and Romantic Relationship
Kenya Association of Professional Counsellors
Higher Diploma in Counselling Studies, 2011-2012
Question:
With reference to relevant literature, give an evaluative account of your personal
experience on any psychological issue of self and relationship.
Title:
“The Stages and Progression of a Close and Romantic Relationship –
my experience in relation to literature”
Facilitators: Beatrice Otieno
Briggid Muisyo
Student: Albert Muraya
Due Date: 15th
September 2011
Submission Date: 30th
April 2012
Words: 3381
Copy: Final Copy
2
TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE
Introduction....................................................................................................................... 3
Stages of Relationships ..................................................................................................... 3
The Honeymoon ................................................................................................................ 4
Discovery............................................................................................................................ 5
The Commitment .............................................................................................................. 7
The Power Struggle........................................................................................................... 8
Tracks I and II ................................................................................................................ 10
Growth and Anger......................................................................................................... 10
Honeymoon and Peace.................................................................................................. 12
The Child ......................................................................................................................... 13
Conclusion ....................................................................................................................... 15
References ........................................................................................................................ 16
3
Introduction
This paper is about my experience in initiating and conducting a romantic relationship
that progressed to a formal engagement with a view to getting married. I will first
examine what literature says about such relationships and then compare my own
experience. I will look at the genesis and nature of each stage for its character and
peculiarities and map my own experience against it.
My definition for romantic relationship is ‘long-term relationship’. This is a conscious,
willing partnership between a man and a woman with a view to getting married and
sharing a life together. The relationship I will describe therefore is heterosexual,
consensual and from a Christian perspective; it was celibate, monogamous and church-
sanctioned.
Stages of Relationships
Rinata Paries (www.lovecoachblog.com/the-eight-stages-of-relationships/) lays out eight
stages that all relationships go through as they mature and develop, namely, the
honeymoon, discovery, commitment, the power struggle, growth (or anger), second
honeymoon or peace at a price (war and peace), the “child”, and finally life crisis. Other
writers have mirrored these stages with Susan Campbell (1980) condensing them to five
– romance, power struggle, stability, commitment, co-creation whilst Don Carter
(www.internet-of-the-mind.com/relationship_stages.html), quoting John Bradshaw,
categorises them as infatuation, disillusionment and conflict, differentiation and intimacy.
4
In all cases there is a view of relationships as dynamic processes that progress from one
level of intimacy and knowledge to another with changing needs and motivators.
From a theoretical stand point these stages blend into one another; there is a possibility of
going back and forth through them. The individuals in the relationship will advance
through the stages at different paces creating imbalances in the relationship, which call
for understanding and patience from the more mature partner.
The Honeymoon
This is a time of blissful happiness where all things seem possible, where there are no
limitations to the relationship. It a stage whose primary motivators are the possibility of
getting each others needs met fuelled by hormonal changes with the neurotransmitters
dopamine, testosterone for men and oestrogen for women playing a leading role.
Campbell (1980) notes that we see in the other what we want to see and reciprocate the
same by being at our best behaviour. The couple does things to please each other as this
is the stage in which the best possibilities of the future are built. There is a tendency to
idealise the other person and believe that they can do no wrong; their faults and
imperfections are over-looked.
This time in the growing relationship is characterised by a lack of honesty and
forthrightness, the partners are unwilling to be assertive and the boundaries between them
are very fluid. Bradshaw (1994) points out that there is healthy co-dependence between
them in that there is a mutually agreed reliance as the two merge. This is not sustainable,
5
though its value is in helping the couple build a shared vision of what the relationship
promises.
My experience was slightly different from the theory put forward. Whilst I was attracted
to my fiancée I would not say that I was head-over-heals in love; I was not infatuated. I
shared a deep Christian faith with my fiancée and had met in the context of a discipleship
programme in which she was my facilitator. We did go through a period of obsessive
contact though I remember it as not being as emotionally charged as I had experienced
with two previous relationships. We spent many hours talking on the phone and once all
night in my car outside her house. There was a period of gamesmanship where we were
coy and circumspect about our intentions, but from the beginning we were sure of two
things – this was to be a celibate relationship until marriage, and that it was ultimately to
lead to marriage. At the beginning she was everything I could have asked for in a woman
- intelligent, loving, giving, humorous, ambitious, meticulous, engaging, and so beautiful.
We shared an abiding faith and much of our time was spent establishing our shared
values. This set the stage for the next phase which is “discovery”.
Discovery
According to Paries (www.getrelationshipsright.com/the-eight-stages-of-relationships/)
this next stage happens three to six months into the relationship where the sheen begins to
wear off. As you become used to each other, the initial excitement tones down and
realism sets in. Certain realities about ones partner begin to become apparent and the
need for boundaries becomes clear; areas of differences and even incompatibilities are
established The partners are faced with choices about whether to proceed with the
6
relationship or not. Love has an opportunity to deepen through mutual respect and the
stage is set for true intimacy; at this point there is early confirmation that one has made
the right choice.
Speaking for myself and with hindsight, there were early signs that all was not well. First
my fiancée was very headstrong and forward, and prided herself in being a leader. Yet
she also ascribed to a traditional Christian role of ‘submissive’ wife who willingly played
second fiddle to her husband. This was to set the stage for later conflict. However as we
began to know each other more intimately, the reality of each others flaws were not
enough to turn us off each other; on the contrary they allowed us to appreciate each
others strengths even more, or so we told ourselves. I had misgivings about her
extravagance and justifications of the same; these were interspersed with a tendency to
wishful thinking by her about how provision would be made available by faith.
This provided the most dynamic element of our relationship – our shared faith. When we
met her intimacy with God was much more developed and she based her lifestyle choices
to a greater degree than I did on her beliefs. I was to be influenced greatly by this and
found it a source of great attraction to her. However there was a period of adjustment as I
had to make a deliberate effort to base my own decisions on the same values as hers; I
found I lagged behind her and leadership in matters spiritual set the scene for conflict and
struggle for influence and power.
7
The Commitment
According to Paries (www.getrelationshipsright.com/the-eight-stages-of-relationships/),
the commitment phase forms the true beginning of the relationship. In secular circles
cohabitation begins at this point. This is a sign of deepening commitment – the first warts
have appeared and been successfully negotiated normally by either ignoring them,
papering over them or by, in a few instances, honest, open dialogue. The importance of
communication in relationship is clearly evident. For most couples things are still so
delicate that despite their growing closeness, there is still a tendency to avoid rocking the
boat. Rather, superficiality combined with taking each other for granted rules the day.
This may seem like a contradiction but is not; having established a working relationship,
wariness of upsetting the applecart leads to avoidance of deep dialogue and thus
assuming each other. It takes a risk to open oneself up to the deeper intimacy which
honest communication produces so many couples settle for less satisfying superficiality.
This makes for misunderstanding down the road.
The commitment phase was marked in our relationship when I met her inner circle for the
first time and raised the possibility of eventually adopting her daughter. As committed
Christians and given our ages – me in my early forties, she ten years younger – there was
a purposefulness about our interaction; we hoped eventually to be married even before
such a topic had been openly discussed. This is because there was no possibility of pre-
marital sex and so anything more than a casual friendship had to have this eventuality as
a real possibility. Perhaps this background made us rush through this phase. A pattern
began to emerge where my fiancée spoke forthrightly about her views and was quite
8
dismissive of opposing opinions. I for my part became wary of voicing my viewpoint
especially on matters of taste and preferences for fear of being rejected or dismissed –
something I had experienced on the few occasions I had stood my ground; and that is
what it felt like, a stand off. This set the scene for the next phase – the Power Struggle.
The Power Struggle
This make or break phase comes up on most couples unexpectedly and they tend to react
characteristically by questioning their original choice of spouse, commitment to the
relationship and begin to seriously consider ending the relationship,
(Paries;www.getrelationshipsright.com/the-eight-stages-of-relationships/). There is
confusion and silence alternating with arguments. Most couples believe that there is
something fundamentally wrong with their relationship and run the risk of either getting
stuck here or and not moving forward which will lead to their ending the relationship
sooner or later.
The seeds of the struggle for supremacy were sown in earlier phases when there was an
unrealistic view that harmony was a sign of compatibility and the rightness of the choice
of mate was confirmed in ready agreement with each other on all matters (Campbell,
1980). As the reality sets in that you do not agree on all things; the need for individuality
and personal space becomes more urgent; maturity and wisdom call for an honest
appraisal of the situation and facilitate open and respectful dialogue. Rules of
engagement can then be established where the partners agree to differ or not.
9
Unfortunately, many couples do not give themselves the chance to reach this higher level
of communication. Believing that something is fundamentally wrong with their
relationship, they will seek to withdraw from each other and even end the relationship. In
ignorance they find that they cannot balance the conflicting needs for individuality versus
intimacy – the need to be a whole person, yet remain in a committed relationship.
My personal experience mirrored this understanding quite closely. As our differences
became clear, there were various attempts by both of us to manipulate and control the
other. When these were rebuffed we resorted to childish patterns of conflict resolution –
threats and intimidation on her part; sulking and passive aggressive behaviour on mine.
She frequently complained that I was not the man I had appeared to be in the beginning
and without realising it began to punish me for it. I found that she was unwilling to be
responsible for her choices and that she frequently blamed me for not meeting her
“needs”, which in reality were unrealistic or unreasonable desires. I on the other hand,
often chose to prolong an argument just to have the last word in a bid for face-saving
control, when the value in the conflict had long since passed.
Not realising that what we were going through was normal, we begun to see our
relationship as fundamentally flawed. She found that we had very little in common, that
we were very different; that our values and preferences were worlds apart. This was for
her indication of an unbridgeable chasm between our worldviews. On my part, I felt
unvalued and disrespected. Because she had less rigid boundaries than me, I often felt
that my intimacies were betrayed. As the dominant partner she was forthright in her
10
opinions and I often felt manipulated and bullied into going with them. This raised old
skeletons about adequacy and worth. I responded by withdrawing and occasionally giving
vent to my growing resentments when I chose to be stubborn or self-centred; behaviour
that was unbecoming of me and which betrayed my commitment to loving and protecting
her. We brought out the worst in each other.
With hindsight, we ought to have sought help at this stage; I made a proposal for couple
counselling, but in her belligerent state suggested that it was just me that needed to
change, and that if I did so then all would be well. A final confrontation led to our going
on a prolonged period of non-communication which ended in her calling off our
engagement. I made two feeble attempts at reconciliation but these were rebuffed. After a
number of months I accepted that the relationship was over and that we were possibly
better off apart.
Tracks I and II
Paries (www.getrelationshipsright.com/the-eight-stages-of-relationships/) argues that the
resolution to the stage of “The Power Struggle” offers two possible outcomes which in
turn determines the possible ways in which the relationship may run its course. She refers
to these as “Track I” and “Track II”. Within each, are symmetrical processes or phases
whose distinguishing feature is whether the couple have chosen the path of dialogue and
reconciliation or silence and tension.
Growth and Anger
11
In track I, Paries (www.getrelationshipsright.com/the-eight-stages-of-relationships/)
identifies that both partners need to take responsibility for their role in the hiatus. If they
can do this they will have a chance to recreate the relationship on a sounder, more mature
and more realistic footing. They need to engage in a period of introspection where self-
discovery through developing insight leads them to engage in healthy meaningful
communication and a negotiation of power issues. It is necessary for the couple to
understand how each sabotages the relationship when they revert to childish and
destructive patterns of relating; in understanding their role in the conflict, they will be
prepared to get rid of the resentments they hold towards each other which will create
room for forgiveness and understanding. This in turn will allow for loving
communication and emotional and spiritual development both individually and together.
However there is a shadow side to this which the couple risks falling under. Campbell
(1980) states that intimacy is a process in which one discloses more and more of oneself
to the other; it requires trust and involve risk. In a stage she refers to as “stability”,
boundaries are put in place that safeguard the individuality of the partners that allow them
to be themselves. Potential stumbling blocks are pride, unforgiveness and emotional
immaturity. If these are given room to fester, they generate deeper and deeper anger that
eventually leads one or both partners seeking solace in an alternative relationship. The
unmet needs and unresolved issues serve to create an impermeable block to the nurturing,
acceptance and respect that is necessary in any loving relationship.
12
At this point outside help must be sought as the couple lack the internal resources to
resolve the issues on their own, and instead things are deteriorating. Emotional numbness
and even depression are the consequences of the unmitigated downward spiral of a
relationship gone sour. It is possible for a couple to stay together especially if they are
cohabiting or married.
In our case, I decided to seek help unilaterally as my fiancée was unwilling to look
beyond my faults and consider outside intervention. She kept giving me evidence of
successful relationships she had witnessed, and maintained that the blame lay with me for
not being willing to sacrifice all, for the sake of the relationship, as a good Christian man
ought. This was not in jest. For my part I felt misunderstood, disrespected and not loved.
I was aware that she was deeply resentful towards me, and whether justified or not her ill-
feeling left me drained, confused and feeling alone.
Honeymoon and Peace
This second post-struggle phase offers two dichotomous possibilities depending on
whether the struggle phase was successfully negotiated or not. In the former, there is a
period of re-cherishing and re-treasuring one another; bonding and connecting on a
higher, more mature and understanding platform can take place. This phase has the
potential to last a lifetime, though the couple need to be aware that disagreements may
arise from time to time and that they will have to be dealt with in a timely way. This new
way of being together requires effort in growth-oriented communication, but the rewards
in intimacy, nurturing love, support and respect are well worth it.
13
Campbell (1980), who calls this phase “commitment”, shows how in helping one another
avoid old unhelpful unhealthy coping mechanisms, the couple will come to accept each
other as they are even as the individual partners accept those parts of themselves that
expect perfection from the other. There is an understanding that each is responsible for
their feelings and it is this new found level of responsibility that allows for the trusting
that engenders intimacy.
In the alternative, there is an uneasy peace whose primary characteristic is indifference
and cynicism. Here the couple are living parallel and separate lives and interact only
when necessary for routine things. They will stop demanding from each other, but love
will have been lost (Paries; http://www.getrelationshipsright.com/the-eight-stages-of-
relationships/). It may take several years to reach this level where the anger is burned out,
but once reached it is very difficult to grow out of; few couples do. The few times we
have interacted together since the end of the engagement have felt like this though we did
not have any commitment and met only to help each other practically. I have however
observed this level of indifference in long-term couples I have encountered.
The Child
Paries (http://www.getrelationshipsright.com/the-eight-stages-of-relationships/) refers to
a shared passion – a literal child, a business, a cause etc. – that the partners may
encounter each other through, as they grow in intimacy. The task is to truly become a
team in communication, collaboration, compromise and commitment. The shadow side is
having a shared commitment as a previous obligation or an avenue for manipulation.
14
Sometimes couples will engage in such an interaction as having a child as a last resort to
keep the relationship alive. The entity created may give rise to the hope that the
relationship is salvageable as it (entity) usually has some intrinsic value; however in
reality, the situation can only be reversed if the deeper underlying issues are addressed,
and this typically, only with outside help.
“Losing” our ‘child’ was a consequence of our break up. The ‘child’ in question was our
shared faith and more specifically our attendance of church together. In the course of our
courtship I had joined her church as she found mine unpalatable. In due course we
identified a third one which we both felt comfortable attending. Initially we were both
happy there, but following one of our disagreements, she chose to stop coming and thus
we “lost” our child. Even now she makes disparaging comments about the church and its
leadership and for me this is symbolic of how she views the relationship we had – as the
enemy.
We failed to win each others trust in not confronting our differences mutually. Had we
done so we would have accepted the other and would have been at ease with the contrasts
in our personalities. We would have been confident in choosing one clear direction to go
in, in the knowledge that we would have been at liberty to change course at any time had
we chosen to. Campbell (1980) describes intimacy as being interdependent – which is
when individuals willingly and ongoingly choose to be dependent on one another, whilst
maintaining their individuality. This is the essence of Christian love – dying to self for
the other, in the knowledge that this will engender and enable the partner to do so too.
15
Conclusion
I trust that I have learned from this debacle and that my next relationship will proceed
more wisely. I do not regret engaging in the relationship to start with. The attributes that
attracted me were real, and had I known then what I know now about relationships, we
might still be together.
I was a little apprehensive about doing this essay as I feared bringing up difficult
emotions; it has left me a little sad that we were not instinctively able to negotiate
through the difficulties we encountered. Had I known better, I would have delayed
committing until all the red flags had been satisfactorily dealt with. This essay has
highlighted for me some unfinished business notably my need to remove the mask I wear
for fear of rejection. This in turn leads me to avoid asserting myself and accept another’s
point of view even when my inner man is railing against it. In the case of my relationship,
this proved disastrous as I began to harbour resentments towards my fiancée who had no
such qualms about standing up for what she wanted.
I am thus glad to have done this paper and I am encouraged both to work on my
abandonment issues as well as embark on another love affair.
16
References
Bradshaw, J (1994) Creating Love: The Next Stage of Growth, New York: Bantam
Books.
Bradshaw, J (2008) Creating Healthy Relationships: Audio book, John Bradshaw Media
Group.
Campbell, S (1980) The Couple's Journey: Intimacy As a Path to Wholeness, Atascadero,
California: Impact Pub.
Carter, D (2011) Freedom from Frozen Feelings: e-book, “http://internet-of -the-
mind.com”.
Carter, D “http://internet-of -the-mind.com/relationship_stages.html” [17th
August 2011].
Paries, R http://www.getrelationshipsright.com/the-eight-stages-of-relationships/ [11th
August 2011].