THE SPEAKING ABILITY OF THE ELEVENTH GRADE …schools. The language skills to be achieved are...

16
i THE SPEAKING ABILITY OF THE ELEVENTH GRADE STUDENTS OF SMA 1 MEJOBO KUDUS IN THE ACADEMIC YEAR 2012/2013 TAUGHT BY USING TASK BASED LEARNING By AMRI SETIYO BUDI NIM 200832158 DEPARTMENT OF ENGLISH EDUCATION FACULTY OF TEACHER TRAINING AND EDUCATION UNIVERSITY OF MURIA KUDUS 2013

Transcript of THE SPEAKING ABILITY OF THE ELEVENTH GRADE …schools. The language skills to be achieved are...

i

THE SPEAKING ABILITY OF THE ELEVENTH GRADE STUDENTS OF

SMA 1 MEJOBO KUDUS IN THE ACADEMIC YEAR 2012/2013

TAUGHT BY USING TASK BASED LEARNING

By

AMRI SETIYO BUDI

NIM 200832158

DEPARTMENT OF ENGLISH EDUCATION

FACULTY OF TEACHER TRAINING AND EDUCATION

UNIVERSITY OF MURIA KUDUS

2013

ii

iii

THE SPEAKING ABILITY OF THE ELEVENTH GRADE STUDENTS OF

SMA 1 MEJOBO KUDUS IN THE ACADEMIC YEAR 2012/2013

TAUGHT BY USING TASK BASED LEARNING

SKRIPSI

Presented to the University of Muria Kudus

in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for Completing the Sarjana

Program in English Education

By

AMRI SETIYO BUDI

NIM 200832158

DEPARTMENT OF ENGLISH EDUCATION

FACULTY OF TEACHER TRAINING AND EDUCATION

UNIVERSITY OF MURIA KUDUS

2013

iv

MOTTO AND DEDICATION

“You don’t have to be perfect to be the best, all you have to do is try to be

perfect”

“Late is better than never”

“The opinion of each makes people blind to the truth”

“Be the person who you want to be”

Dedication:

This research is dedicated to:

Allah SWT the Almighty and his Prophet

Muhammad, peace be upon on him.

His entire family, for all prayers which have been

said and all spirit given.

Thanks all for his Friends who give motivation

(Maruf, Intan, Arif, Sibil, Junanto, Yakin, Son

Haji, Latief, Said, Gufron, Nadif, Faris, Ira,

Wahyu, JJM, and etc)

v

vi

vii

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

First of all, the researcher thanks to Allah SWT, thealmighty who has

given mercy and blessing. So the researcher is able to finish his research as one of

the requirements in obtaining the Sarjana Degree of the English Education

Department of Teacher Training and Education Faculty of Muria Kudus

University. The researcher realizes that there is not strength except from Allah

SWT.

This research could not have been completed without support and

guidance from many people, so the researcher would like to express his great

gratitude to as follows;

1. Drs. SusiloRahardjo, M.Pd., as the Dean of English Education Department

of Teacher Training and Education Faculty of Muria Kudus University.

2. Fitri Budi Suryani, S.S, M.Pd., as The Head of English Education

Departmentof Teacher Training and Education Faculty of Muria Kudus

University.

3. DiahKurniati, S.Pd, M.Pd., as the First Advisor who has given me

guidance, correction and suggestion wisely in accomplishing this Skripsi.

4. Drs. Muh. Syafei, M.Pd, as the second advisor, who gives me wise

suggestions in completing this skripsi.

5. All lecturers and staff of English Education Department of Teacher

Training and Education Faculty of Muria Kudus University.

6. Officers of the main library of Muria Kudus University who have given a

satisfactory service.

viii

7. Drs.H.Shodiqun, the Headmaster of SMA 1 Mejobo Kudus who has given

permission to do this research in his school.

8. Jamadi, S.Pd., the English teacher of IPS classes, and students of grade XI

especially IPS program, for their help and cooperate in finishing his

research.

9. Maruf, Intan, Sibil, Latief, Said, Gufron, Nadif, Faris, junanto, Arif, son

Haji, Yakin, Ira, Wahyu, Julita, JJM, for their support, help, pray, and

togetherness.

Kudus, 30 January 2013

The researcher,

AmriSetiyo Budi

ix

ABSTRACT

Budi, AmriSetiyo. 2013. The Speaking Ability of the Eleventh Grade Students of

SMA 1 Mejobo Kudus in the Academic Year 2012/2013 Taught by Using

Task Based Learning. Skripsi. English Education Department, Teacher

Training And Education Faculty, Muria Kudus University. Advisors: (i)

DiahKurniati, S.Pd, M.Pd, (ii) Drs. Muh. Syafei, M.Pd.

Keywords: Speaking Skill, Task Based Learning.

English as one of the international languages is very important since it is

bridging of communication among people in different countries. In Indonesia,

English is taught in elementary schools, junior high schools, and senior high

schools. The language skills to be achieved are divided into four; listening,

speaking, reading and writing. Speaking as one of the four major skills in English

is an important skill.

This research is aimed at knowing the speaking ability of the eleventh grade

students of SMA1 Mejoo Kudus in the academic year 2012/2013 before and after

being taught by using Task Based Learning.

This research is a quantitative experimental research. The data were

collected by recording. Instrument of the research is oral test. The researcher gave

pre test before being taught by using Task Based Learning and gave post test after

being taught by using Task Based Learning. The sample of the research count of

thirty four students from XI IPS 1. The sample is divided by using cluster random

sampling.

The result of this research can be seen from the pre test and the post test

result. The pre test result of the mean is 60.91and standard deviation is 5.65. It

means that the speaking ability of the eleventh grade students of SMA 1 Mejobo

Kudus in the academic year 2012/2013 before being taught by using Task Based

Learning is sufficient. Meanwhile, the post test result the mean is 71.14 and

standard deviation is 7.2. So, the result of the speaking ability after being taught

by using Task Based Learning of the eleventh grade students of SMA 1 Mejobo

Kudus in the academic year 2012/2013 is good. The Hypothesis is confirmed in

the level significance 0,05(5%) is 1.694 and the degree of freedom (N-1)= 33

shows that there is significant difference between the speaking ability of eleventh

grade students of SMA 1 Mejobo Kudus in the academic year 2012/2013 before

and after being taught by using Task Based Learning. The result of t0 (12.034) is

higher than t- table (1.694). Therefore, it can be concluded that the Null

hypothesis is denied, while the alternative hypothesis of the research is confirmed.

In this research, the researcher suggests the English teachers use Task Based

Learning as a teaching method to improve students speaking ability. The students

have to be more confident and not to be afraid of making mistake when they are

speaking in front of the class.

x

ABSTRAK

Budi, Amri Setiyo. 2013. Kemampuan Berbicara Siswa Kelas Sebelas SMA 1

Mejobo Kudus Tahun Ajaran 2012/2013 Diajar menggunakan Task Based

Learning. Skripsi .Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris, Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu

Pendidikan, Universitas Muria Kudus.Pembimbing: (i) Diah Kurniati, S.Pd,

M. Pd, (ii) Drs. Muh. Syafei, M.Pd.

Kata Kunci: Kemampuan Berbicara,Task Based Learning.

Bahasa Inggris sebagai bahasa Internasional sangat penting sejak bahasa itu

digunakan sebagai jembatan komunikasi diantara manusia di berbagai negara

yang berbeda. Di Indonesia, bahasa Inggris di kenalkan dari SD, SMP dan SMA.

Bahasa dibagi menjadi empat kemampuan. Diantaranya, mendengarkan,

berbicara, membaca dan menulis. Berbicara adalah salah satu dari empat

kemampuan dasar yang sangat penting.

Penelitian ini memiliki tujuan untuk mengetahui kemampuan berbicara

siswa kelas sebelas SMA 1 Mejobo Kudus tahun ajaran 2012/2013 sebelum dan

setelah menggunakan Task Based Learning.

Penelitian ini adalah penelitian eksperimen kuantitative. Data diperoleh dari

rekaman. Instrumen dari penelitian adalah test secara oral. Peneliti memberikan

pre test sebelum menggunakan Task Based Learning dan memberi post test

setelah menggunakan Task Based Learning. Sampel penelitian sebanyak

tigapuluh empat siswa dari XI IPS 1. Sample didapat menggunakan cara

pengacakan kelas.

Hasil dari penelitian ini dapat dilihat dari hasil pre test dan post test. Hasil

pre test, nilai rata-rata (mean) = 60.91danstandatdeviasi = 5.65. Jadi, hasil dari

kemampuan berbicara pada siswa kelas sebelas SMA 1 Mejobo Kudus tahun

pelajaran 2012/2013 sebelum diajarkan menggunakan task based learning adalah

cukup. Sementara itu, pada hasil post test, nilai rata-rata (mean) = 71.14dan

standat deviasi = 7.2. Jadi, hasil dari kemampuan berbicara pada siswa kelas

sebelas SMA 1 Mejobo Kudus tahun pelajaran 2012/2013 sesudah diajarkan

menggunakan task based learning adalahbaik. Hipotesispadatingkat signifikan

0.05 (5%) = 1.694 dan tingkat kebebasan (N-1) = 33, menunjukkanbahwaada

perbedaan antara kemampuan berbicara siswa kelas sebelas SMA 1 Mejobo

Kudus tahun pelajaran 2012/2013 sebelum dan sesudah diajarkan menggunakan

task based learning. Hasil t0 (12.034) lebih tinggi dari t-tabel (1.694).Oleh karena

itu, dapat dikatakan bahwa null hipotesis ditolak, sementara alternatif hipotesis

diterima.

Dalam penelitian ini, peneliti menyarankan kepada guru bahasa Inggris

untuk menggunakan Task Based Learning sebagai metode pembelajaran untuk

meningkatkan kemampuan berbicara siswa.Siswa harus lebih percaya diri dan

jangan takut membuat kesalahan ketika berbicara di depan kelas.

.

xi

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Page

COVER ........................................................................................................... i

LOGO .............................................................................................................. ii

PAGE TITLE ................................................................................................. iii

MOTTO AND DEDICATION ...................................................................... iv

ADVISORS’ APPROVAL ............................................................................ v

EXAMINERS’ APPROVAL ......................................................................... vi

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ........................................................................... vii

ABSTRACT .................................................................................................... ix

TABLE OF CONTENT ................................................................................. xi

LIST OF TABLES ......................................................................................... xiv

LIST OF FIGURES ....................................................................................... xv

LIST OF APPENDICES ............................................................................... xvi

CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION

1.1 Background of the Research ...................................................................... 1

1.2 Statements of the Problem ......................................................................... 4

1.3 Objective of the Research .......................................................................... 4

1.4 Significance of the Research ...................................................................... 4

1.5 Limitation of the Research ......................................................................... 5

1.6 Definition of the Term ............................................................................... 5

CHAPTER II REVIEW TO RELATED LITERATURE

2.1 Teaching English in SMA 1Mejobo Kudus............................................ 7

2.1.1 The Purpose of Teaching English in SMA 1 Mejobo Kudus ................. 8

2.1.2 The Material of Teaching English in SMA 1 Mejobo Kudus ................ 8

2.2 Speaking ................................................................................................ 9

2.2.1 Definition of Speaking ............................................................................ 9

2.2.2 The Components of Speaking ................................................................. 10

2.3 Task Based Learning .............................................................................. 11

2.3.1 Definition of Task Based Learning......................................................... 11

2.3.2 Task Based Learning Framework ........................................................... 12

2.3.3 Types of Task Based Learning ............................................................... 14

xii

2.3.4 Steps of Task Based Learning ................................................................ 15

2.3.5 The advantages of Task Based Learning ................................................ 15

2.4 Review of Previous Research ................................................................. 16

2.5 Theoretical Framework ........................................................................... 18

2.6 Hypothesis of the Research .................................................................... 18

CHAPTER III RESEARCH METHOD

3.1 Design of the Research ........................................................................... 20

3.2 Population and Sample ........................................................................... 21

3.2.1 Population ............................................................................................... 21

3.2.2 Sample ..................................................................................................... 22

3.3 Instrument of the Research ..................................................................... 22

3.3.1 Validity .................................................................................................... 26

3.4 Technique of Collecting Data ................................................................ 26

3.5 Technique of Analyzing Data ................................................................. 27

CHAPTER IV RESEARCHFINDING

4.1 The Significant Different of The Speaking Ability of the Eleventh

Grade Students of SMA 1 Mejobo Kudus in the Academic Year

2012/2013 before and After Being Taught By Using Task Based

Learning .................................................................................................... 30

4.3 Hypothesis Testing .................................................................................... 35

CHAPTER V DISCUSSION

5.1 Discussion ................................................................................................. 37

CHAPTER VI CONCLUSION AND SUGGESTION

6.1 Conclusion ................................................................................................ 41

6.2 Suggestion .................................................................................................. 42

BIBLIOGRAPHY .......................................................................................... 43

xiii

APPENDICES ................................................................................................ 44

CURRICULUM VITAE ................................................................................ 108

STATEMENT ................................................................................................. 109

xiv

LIST OF TABLES

Table Page

3.1 The Table Scoring of speaking test ........................................................ 23

3.2 The Assessment criteria of the speaking ability ..................................... 25

4.1 The speaking ability of the eleventh grade students of SMA 1 Mejobo

Kudus in the Academic Year 2012/2013 before being taught by using

Task Based Learning .............................................................................. 31

4.2 Frequency distribution of the speaking ability of the eleventh grade

students of SMA 1 Mejobo Kudus in the Academic Year 2012/2013

before being taught by using Task Based Learning................................ 31

4.3 The speaking ability of the eleventh grade students of SMA 1 Mejobo

Kudus in the Academic Year 2012/2013 after being taught by using

Task Based Learning .............................................................................. 32

4.4 Frequency distribution of the speaking ability of the eleventh grade

students of SMA 1 Mejobo Kudus in the Academic Year 2012/2013

after being taught by using Task Based Learning .................................. 33

4.5 The summary of t-test result of eleventh grade students of SMA 1

Mejobo Kudus in the Academic Year 2012/2013 .................................. 36

xv

LIST OF FIGURES

Figure Page

4.1 The Bar Chart of speaking ability of the eleventh grade students of SMA

1 Mejobo Kudus in the Academic Year 2012/2013 before being taught

by Using Task Based Learning ................................................................. 32

4.2 The Bar Chart of speaking ability of the eleventh grade students of SMA

1 Mejobo Kudus in the Academic Year 2012/2013 after being taught by

using Task Based Learning ....................................................................... 34

.

xvi

LIST OF APPENDICES

Appendix Page

1. Syllabus ....................................................................................................... 45

2. Lesson .......................................................................................................... 52

3. Instrument of the Pre Test ........................................................................... 86

4. Pre-Test Scoring in the XI IPS 1................................................................. 89

5. The Calculation of Mean and Standard Deviation of Teaching Speaking

Before Taught by Using Task Based Learning to The Eleventh Grade

Studentsof SMA 1 Mejobo Kudus In the Academic Year 2012/2013 ........ 92

6. Instrument of the Post test ........................................................................... 94

7. Scoring Post Test in the class XI IPS 1 ....................................................... 97

8. The Calculation of Mean and Standard Deviation of Teaching Speaking

After Taught By Using Task Based Learning to the Eleventh Grade

Students of SMA 1 Mejobo Kudus In the Academic Year 2012/2013 ....... 100

9. The Calculation to Find Out T-Test ............................................................. 102

10. Critical value of t- table.............................................................................. 104

11.Transcript of Pre Test Record ..................................................................... 105

12.Transcript of Post Test Record .................................................................... 106