The Sociocultural Level of Analysis 4.1 Sociocultural Cognition.

42
The Sociocultural Level of Analysis 4.1 Sociocultural Cognition

Transcript of The Sociocultural Level of Analysis 4.1 Sociocultural Cognition.

Page 1: The Sociocultural Level of Analysis 4.1 Sociocultural Cognition.

The Sociocultural Level of Analysis

4.1 Sociocultural Cognition

Page 2: The Sociocultural Level of Analysis 4.1 Sociocultural Cognition.

Principles

1. Human beings are social animals and we have a basic need to belong

2. Culture influences behaviour3. Because humans are social animals, they have

a social self. People do not only have an individual identity, but also a collective or social one

4. People’s views of the world are resistant to change

Page 3: The Sociocultural Level of Analysis 4.1 Sociocultural Cognition.

CULTURE

• Culture can be defined as the norms and values that define a society

Page 4: The Sociocultural Level of Analysis 4.1 Sociocultural Cognition.

Be Reflective

1. Brainstorm a list of the groups to which you belong.

2. How important are these groups in your personal identity?

3. What needs do these different groups fill in your life?

Page 5: The Sociocultural Level of Analysis 4.1 Sociocultural Cognition.

Research Methods

• More qualitative• Naturalistic• Participant observation• Descriptive data• Overt observation• Covert observation

*handouts

Page 6: The Sociocultural Level of Analysis 4.1 Sociocultural Cognition.

Participant Observation

• Overt Observation: example – O´Reilly 2000 studied British expatriates on the Costa del Sol

• Ethical considerations

Page 7: The Sociocultural Level of Analysis 4.1 Sociocultural Cognition.

Covert

• Covert: Example – Leon Festinger et al’s When Prophecy Fails 1956 in Chicago – a religious cult

• Ethical considerations

Page 8: The Sociocultural Level of Analysis 4.1 Sociocultural Cognition.

Attribution Theory

• Attribution is defined as how people interpret and explain causal relationships in the social world

• Humans have a need to understand why things happen

Example: 1. Explain why to this scenario: You are sitting in an restaurant, waiting for your date to show up. He or she is late. What is your explanation to why he or she is late?2. You received a high grade on a test. What is your explanation to the high grade?

Page 9: The Sociocultural Level of Analysis 4.1 Sociocultural Cognition.

Attribution Theory

• Who (or what) is responsible?For poverty? For unemployment? For alcoholism? For my math grade?

• whether we help and how we help– “Who is responsible for the problem?”– “Who is responsible for the solution?”

Page 10: The Sociocultural Level of Analysis 4.1 Sociocultural Cognition.

Attribution Theory

• By Heider 1958, based on the assumption that people want to try to explain observable behaviour (like a scientist).

• Dispositional or situational factors• People have a need for it and tend to look for

causes and reasons (motives) to construct our own causal relationships

• Want to be able to understand, predict and control the environment

Page 11: The Sociocultural Level of Analysis 4.1 Sociocultural Cognition.

Attribution Theory

• Cultures construct their own causal explanations, for example the origin and meaning of life

• Sometimes people apply motives and dispositions to objects or choose to believe in fate or witchcraft

• Example: Evan-Pritchard 1976, Azane people in central Africa belived it was witchcraft that killed several people when a doorway collapsed when the door had been eaten through by termites.

Page 12: The Sociocultural Level of Analysis 4.1 Sociocultural Cognition.

The Actor-observer effect

When people discuss their own behaviour, they tend to do attribute it to situational factors (external) “bad luck” “had a cold”

The tendency to think: "If others make mistakes, it's their fault. If I do it, it's not my fault. It's due to the situation I'm in."

When people observe someone else’s behaviour, they are more likely to attribute it to dispositional factors (internal) “he is so nice” “she is so smart”

Page 13: The Sociocultural Level of Analysis 4.1 Sociocultural Cognition.

Errors in Attributions – illogical conclusions

The Fundamental attribution error• Is when people overestimate the role of

dispositional factors in an individual’s behaviour, and underestimate the situational factors

• “she helped me – so she must be nice”• “what an idiot, he didn’t say hello today”

• Example: Read Lee Ross et al. 1977 , p. 105

Page 14: The Sociocultural Level of Analysis 4.1 Sociocultural Cognition.

Evaluation

Strengths: • has helped us to understand how people make

common errors when they try to explain what happens in the world

• Supported by many studies

Limitations: • culturally biased (why do you think?)• Lab and sampling bias (explain why)

Page 15: The Sociocultural Level of Analysis 4.1 Sociocultural Cognition.

Errors in attribution

• Self-Serving bias (SSB)The tendency to make personal attributions for successes and situational attributions for failureFor example: a good grade – I am so smart!A low grade – bad teacher/ been sick/ wrong questions…Example: Read Lau & Russel’s (1980) study about American football coaches and players

Why do we do this? (Greenberg et al. 1982)

Page 16: The Sociocultural Level of Analysis 4.1 Sociocultural Cognition.

Strength of bias depends on…

• If one is depressed – the thinking pattern changes• Which culture one is from, for example:Modesty bias – cultural differences in SSB US and Japanese students, Kashima and Triandis 1986 asked to remember details from slides from unfamiliar countries and then asked to explain their performance.

Why do you think that is?

Page 17: The Sociocultural Level of Analysis 4.1 Sociocultural Cognition.

Attitudes Do our attitudes influence our actions?

–  More so when we are more self-conscious

Do actions influence our attitudes?

Cognitive dissonance (Festinger)– when attitudes andbehavior contradict each other … what changes?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=korGK0yGIDo

Page 18: The Sociocultural Level of Analysis 4.1 Sociocultural Cognition.

Biases in Judgment Implicit Personality Theory

– People assume that certain aspects or traits go together

• Halo effect: We assume people we like have good characteristics, even if we haven’t seen them, or perceive more characteristics as positive as well without knowing

• An example would be judging a good-looking person as more intelligent. (see video on attraction on the blog, job interviews)

Self-concept bias– What we consider important in ourselves is often

what we consider important in others Primacy effects

– People are influenced more by info they receive early in an interaction than by info that appears later

– We will even re-interpret new information so that it fits our earlier impression of people

Page 19: The Sociocultural Level of Analysis 4.1 Sociocultural Cognition.

Activity

• Would you like to do some role-playing?1. The fundamental attribution2. Self-serving bias3. Cognitive dissonance

Page 20: The Sociocultural Level of Analysis 4.1 Sociocultural Cognition.

Social Identity Theory

Page 21: The Sociocultural Level of Analysis 4.1 Sociocultural Cognition.

Social Identity Theory• Henry Tajfel developed this theory• Which assumes that individuals strive to improve

their self-image by trying to enhance their self-esteem based on either personal identity or various social identities

• In other words, We also enhance the sense of identity by making comparisons with out-groups.

• Social identity is different from personal identity, which is derived from personal characteristics and individual relationships.

Page 22: The Sociocultural Level of Analysis 4.1 Sociocultural Cognition.

Social Identity Theory

• Example: When abroad, especially in countries which have particularly different languages and cultures, we feel our nationality far more keenly than when we are at home. We will tend to band together in national groups, perhaps making comments about the strangeness of the natives.

• Recognize yourself?

Page 23: The Sociocultural Level of Analysis 4.1 Sociocultural Cognition.
Page 24: The Sociocultural Level of Analysis 4.1 Sociocultural Cognition.

Social identity Theory

• Based on Social categorization• In-group (us) – out-group (them) and by social

comparison one maintain one’s self-esteem• This is done automatically, as soon as we

consider us being part of a group, even when it is by chance/casually assigned. Is there one between DP1 and DP2? Other classes?

Page 25: The Sociocultural Level of Analysis 4.1 Sociocultural Cognition.

Evaluation

• absence of competition – not necessarily a negative outcome

• Describes• Does not predict• In Some cases our personal identity is stronger• Fails to address the environment

Page 26: The Sociocultural Level of Analysis 4.1 Sociocultural Cognition.

Social Representations – foundation of social cognition

• The shared beliefs and explanations held by the society in which we live or the group to which we belong (Moscovici 1973)

• “cultural schemas”

- Provide a common understanding for communication within the group

Page 27: The Sociocultural Level of Analysis 4.1 Sociocultural Cognition.
Page 28: The Sociocultural Level of Analysis 4.1 Sociocultural Cognition.

Stereotypes & Prejudice

• Write down the first thing that comes to your mind when I say the following…and be honest.

• WE ALL have stereotypes!

Page 29: The Sociocultural Level of Analysis 4.1 Sociocultural Cognition.

• Swedes• IB student• IV student• Malmö• Doctor• Blond girl• Men• teachers• Scientist• Women• Americans• Chinese

Page 30: The Sociocultural Level of Analysis 4.1 Sociocultural Cognition.

Stereotypes

• Is defined as social perception of an individual in terms of group membership or physical attributes. It is a generalization that is made about a group and then attributed to members of that group.

• Can be either positive or negative.

Page 31: The Sociocultural Level of Analysis 4.1 Sociocultural Cognition.

Implicit Association Test (Harvard)• Online test that tests your attitudes (implicitly)• The Implicit Association Test (IAT) measures

attitudes and beliefs that people may be unwilling or unable to report.

• The IAT may be especially interesting if it shows that you have an implicit attitude that you did not know about.

• For example, you may believe that women and men should be equally associated with science, but your automatic associations could show that you (like many others) associate men with science more than you associate women with science

Page 32: The Sociocultural Level of Analysis 4.1 Sociocultural Cognition.

What are implicit and explicit stereotypes?

• Stereotypes are the belief that most members of a group have some characteristic.

• Some examples of stereotypes are the belief that women are nurturing or the belief that police officers like donuts.

• An explicit stereotype is the kind that you deliberately think about and report.

• An implicit stereotype is one that occurs outside of conscious awareness and control.

• Even if you say that men and women are equally good at math, it is possible that you associate math with men without knowing it. In this case we would say that you have an implicit math-men stereotype.

Page 33: The Sociocultural Level of Analysis 4.1 Sociocultural Cognition.

Task

• After completing one IAT, answer the questions on the handout in writing (on the blog)

• Your answers may be short – the importance is that you reflect upon implicit stereotypes and the potential consequences they may have on people’s behaviour (including you)

Page 34: The Sociocultural Level of Analysis 4.1 Sociocultural Cognition.

Formation of stereotypes (how do we get them?)

• Stereotyping is form of social categorization that affects the behaviour of those who hold the stereotype and those who are labelled by a stereotype.

• Schema processing

Page 35: The Sociocultural Level of Analysis 4.1 Sociocultural Cognition.
Page 36: The Sociocultural Level of Analysis 4.1 Sociocultural Cognition.
Page 37: The Sociocultural Level of Analysis 4.1 Sociocultural Cognition.

Formation of stereotypes

Social categorization (Tajfel)Personal experience and gatekeepers (the

media, parents…)Campbell: grain of truth hypothesis(although remember the errors in attribution)Hamilton and Gifford: stereotypes are the result

of an illusory correlation – people see a relationship between two variables even when there is none

Page 38: The Sociocultural Level of Analysis 4.1 Sociocultural Cognition.

Formation of stereotypeso Confirmation bias – seek out support for the

stereotype, which makes stereotypical thinking resistant to change

o Snyder and Swann (1978) conducted a study which showed just that with female college students (introverted vs. extroverted)

o Methods one use to study stereotyping, prejudice and discrimination…? Due to social desirability effect and “politically correct”

Page 39: The Sociocultural Level of Analysis 4.1 Sociocultural Cognition.

Another teacher who wanted to teach through role-playing…

• Jane Elliot –A Class Divided• http://

www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hqp6GnYqIjQ

Page 40: The Sociocultural Level of Analysis 4.1 Sociocultural Cognition.

Stereotype Threat (stereotypes effect on behaviour)

• The effect of stereotypes on an individual’s performance

• Spotlight anxiety (Steele 1997)

• Women and Math (Spencer et al. 1977)• Ethnicity and different abilities (Steele and

Aronson 1995)Videos on the blog

Page 41: The Sociocultural Level of Analysis 4.1 Sociocultural Cognition.

Stereotype threat affects cognitive ability

Women and Math stereotype threat:• http://www.youtube.com/watch?

v=tjn6ZSU_zS0&feature=related

Stereotype threat:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nGEUVM6QuMg

Page 42: The Sociocultural Level of Analysis 4.1 Sociocultural Cognition.

Homework

• Find two examples of stereotypes in the media (newspaper, books, posters, films, products…)

• Bring it to class and explain why the image represents a stereotype.