The Social Dimensions of Crime 1. Age and Crime 2. Class and Crime 3. Gender and Crime 4. Race and...
-
date post
20-Dec-2015 -
Category
Documents
-
view
229 -
download
1
Transcript of The Social Dimensions of Crime 1. Age and Crime 2. Class and Crime 3. Gender and Crime 4. Race and...
The Social Dimensions of Crime
1.Age and Crime 2.Class and Crime3.Gender and Crime4.Race and Crime
Age and Crime
Age is inversely related to criminality Younger people (regardless class, race, sex)
commit crime more often than their older peers
The peak age of onset of offending is between 8 and 14
Prevalence of offending peaks in the late teenage years (between 15 and 19)
The peak of desistance from offending is between 20 and 29
What do we know from criminological research about Age and Crime? (Farringdon, 2003)
Age-graded Theory
8-9 years 15-19 years 45-55 years
Age and Crime
How can this phenomenon be explained?
Early onset predicts a long career and many offences Small fraction of the population, “chronic offenders”
commit a large fraction of all crimes Most offences up to the late teenage years are
committed with others, whereas most offences from age 20 onwards are committed alone
Reasons given for offending up to late teenage years: utilitarian, excitement/joy, relive boredom, anger
Reasons for later offending are mostly utilitarian
Age and Crime
Several competing explanations
Maturation reform (hormones, burning out, aging causes desistance)
Life-course view (Sampson, Laub, 1993) – based on social bond theory, turning points in life
M. Warr “Number of friends and age” Moffitt’s typology (Adolescents-limited, life-course
persistent, risk factors: neuropsychological deficit, hyperactivity, impulsivity, low self-control)
Matza’s Drift Theory (Neutralization) Latent Trait theory (Gottfredson and Hirschi) - a
person’s level of self-control) Opportunity might change but self-control is stable
Age-Graded Life-Course Theory
Causal relationship between early delinquent offending and later adult deviant behavior is not solely a product of individual characteristics
Social events may change some individuals while others continue to offend
Informal social bonds to family and employment during adulthood explain changes in criminality
Age-Graded Life-Course Theory
Life-course model
Social bonds created by strong attachment to a spouse, military, job stability and commitment, and employee-employer interdependence reduce crime
The social ties embedded in adult transitions (i.e. marital attachment and job stability) explain variations in crime
Latent Trait Model
Low self-control is evident in early childhood through specific personality characteristics
Inability to postpone gratification, a low tolerance for frustration, high levels of risk-taking behavior, shamelessness
Latent Trait Model
Self-control develops through parental emotional investment in the child
Monitoring the child's behavior, recognizing deviance when it occurs, and punishing the child
Parental emotional investment is necessary in order to activate the self-control
Latent Trait Model
Gottfredson and Hirschi (1990) defined self-control as the degree to which a person is “vulnerable to the temptations of the moment” (p. 87).
They viewed Low Self-Control as a behavior pattern arising from ineffective socialization early in life
This pattern was said to be quite stable, when established, and was cited as the primary individual-level factor explaining crime
People with low self-control have unstable marriages, jobs, and friends
Social Class System (Warner's model)
The American class structure, for all the social mobility (moving up) that's supposed to be going on, has really been fairly rigid and fixed
Class System
UPPER-UPPER is a class that we know little about ("Less than 2% of the population controls over 65% of the wealth“). They have low visibility, luxurious living, and a lot of inherited wealth (which they usually keep within their own social class).
LOWER-UPPER is a class of the new rich, consisting of lottery winners, self-made billionaires, savvy investors. They tend to seek out visibility and high-prestige occupations, often in politics or higher education (they like honorary degrees).
Class System
UPPER-MIDDLE class is living the American Dream, and they spend most of their time worrying about how "good" their possessions are; their house, their neighborhood, their city.
LOWER-MIDDLE is the class which is "getting by" or "living paycheck to paycheck“.
Class System
UPPER-LOWER or the Working Class is the largest class in America.
They make up the bulk of the labor force in both skilled, semi-skilled, and service professions. Apartment or mobile home dwellers, usually, this group is living in so much debt nowadays that it's almost like economic slavery
They have extremely strong pride and a lot of contact with the criminal justice system.
Class System
LOWER-LOWER or the Underclass is a fairly permanent class that is so dependent on government services, subsidies, and assistance that they might even starve if not for some kind of intervention that always seems to be needed
Poor health and lots of contact with the criminal justice system occur regularly with this class
System of Values
MIDDLE CLASS VALUES
Deferred gratificationVerbal skillsRationalityAsceticismAmbitionIndividual Responsibility & TalentCourtesy & Chivalry
LOWER CLASS VALUES Instant gratification
Motor skillsSpontaneity-ExpressivenessSociabilityGenerosityChildhood-like approach to ResponsibilitySensuality & Sexuality
Social Class and Crime
Official statistics indicate that crime rates in inner-city, high-poverty areas are higher than those in suburban areas
Self-reports of prison inmates show that prisoners are members of the lower class
Self reports of adolescents found little or no relationship between social class and crime
Possible Explanations
W. Chambliss’s study of “Saints and Roughnecks”
Less visible, public bias, better demeanor Who you are is more important than what you
do
Gender and Crime
Women commit a small share of all crimes Their crimes are fewer, less serious, more
rarely professional and less likely to be repeated
Females are less likely to be arrested if they cry, express concern for their children, or claim to be “led” by men (DeFleur, 1990)
In consequence, women formed a small proportion of prison populations
Gender and Crime
Most victims and perpetrators in homicides are male:
Male offender/Male victim 65.1% Male offender/Female victim 22.6% Female offender/Male victim 9.9% Female offender/Female victim 2.4%
The gender distribution of homicide victims and offenders differs by type of homicide
Women are particularly at risk for intimate killings, sex-related homicides, and murder by arson or poison.Women are more likely to commit murder as a result of an argument or murder by poison.
Gender and crime
How can we explain gender differences in criminal behavior?
Differential socialization Hagan’s power control theory (patriarchal
families vs egalitarian families) “liberation hypothesis” (competitiveness,
increased opportunities to offend, equal in everything)
Gender and crime
Racial differences exist, with blacks disproportionately represented among
homicide victims and offenders
Family StructureFamily Structure
Research on family structure has usually Research on family structure has usually examined the impact of broken homes examined the impact of broken homes on delinquency. on delinquency.
Smith(1978) found that in the majority of Smith(1978) found that in the majority of African American homes father absence African American homes father absence had no outcome or positive effects. had no outcome or positive effects.
Social and economic factors influence Social and economic factors influence the role of the father in the family. the role of the father in the family.
Future research should look at the Future research should look at the strength and nature of relationships strength and nature of relationships within the family.within the family.
Most murders are intraracial Arrest Rates per 100,000 by Race
1
10
100
1000
Homicide Rape Robbery AA
Arr
est
Rate
African American White
Homicide victimization rates by age, gender, and race, 1976-2002
Arrests Rates Per 100,000 by Race
1
10
100
1000
10000
Arson MVT Burglary Larceny
Arr
est
Rate
African American White