The Shift from "Ordinary" to "Extraordinary" Experience in Psychodynamic Supervision

148
The Shift from “Ordinary” to “Extraordinary” Experience in Psychodynamic Supervision James Tobin, Ph.D.

description

In this paper, presented to Division 39 (Psychoanalysis) at the 2012 APA Conference in Orlando, Florida, Dr. Tobin argues that the trainee and novice clinician may create a therapeutic setting in which the therapist manifests an attitude and demeanor drawn largely from standards forms of interpersonal interaction and the mores constituting typical social discourse. Clinical supervision may also reflect an investment in restricted forms of experience, thus leading to “sterile supervision” characterized by defensive processes and false manifestations. Dr. Tobin argues that the clinical situation is an "extraordinary" social experience that sacrifices most forms of standard social discourse in order to create an open space in which therapist and patient are unhindered by that which normally is. Supervision, therefore, should be focused on developing in the supervisee a therapeutic persona mobilized by the trainee's experience of new freedoms encountered in supervision.

Transcript of The Shift from "Ordinary" to "Extraordinary" Experience in Psychodynamic Supervision

Page 1: The Shift from "Ordinary" to "Extraordinary" Experience in Psychodynamic Supervision

The Shift from “Ordinary” to “Extraordinary” Experience in Psychodynamic Supervision

 James Tobin, Ph.D.

Page 2: The Shift from "Ordinary" to "Extraordinary" Experience in Psychodynamic Supervision

2

The Shift from “Ordinary” to “Extraordinary” Experience in Psychodynamic Supervision

 James Tobin, Ph.D. Private Practice, Newport Beach, CA  

Assistant Professor of Clinical Psychology Argosy University, Orange County, CA

phone: 949-338-4388web: www.jamestobinphd.comemail: [email protected]  

Page 3: The Shift from "Ordinary" to "Extraordinary" Experience in Psychodynamic Supervision

3

Introduction

In this presentation, I will describe an approach to psychodynamic supervision inspired by my work with a particular student.

Her use of the word “extraordinary” in a discussion helped me to conceptualize an important process in dynamic supervision: the shift from “ordinary” to “extraordinary” experience; this has become a central organizing metaphor in my work and I will attempt to outline its heuristic value.  

 

Page 4: The Shift from "Ordinary" to "Extraordinary" Experience in Psychodynamic Supervision

4

Introduction 

If we agree, as Ablon and Jones (2005, p. 564-565) observed in their research on the analytic process, that “psychological knowledge of the self can develop only in the context of a relationship within which the psychotherapist endeavors to understand the mind of the patient through the medium of their interaction”, then I hope this presentation will provide a pragmatic framework for how to support supervisees’ capacity to utilize this medium through the metaphor of the “extraordinary.”

Page 5: The Shift from "Ordinary" to "Extraordinary" Experience in Psychodynamic Supervision

5

Psychotherapy Training: A Fairly Bleak Picture

Numerous writers have portrayed a fairly bleak picture of the efficacy of psychotherapy training at all levels of professional development, including the training of psychoanalytic candidates.  

Page 6: The Shift from "Ordinary" to "Extraordinary" Experience in Psychodynamic Supervision

6

Psychotherapy Training Issues

Major problems with current training approaches are well documented in a comprehensive review by Fauth et al. (2007) and include:

• Too narrow of a focus on therapeutic micro-skills; 

• Emphasis on technical adherence to theoretical orientations at the expense of more global capacities;

Page 7: The Shift from "Ordinary" to "Extraordinary" Experience in Psychodynamic Supervision

7

Psychotherapy Training Issues

• Strict adherence to manual-guided techniques;

• The failure to foster durable improvements in overall therapeutic effectiveness. 

Page 8: The Shift from "Ordinary" to "Extraordinary" Experience in Psychodynamic Supervision

8

Binder’s Critique

In two important papers in which he evaluated the empirical and theoretical literature re: psychotherapy training, Binder (1993, 2002) concluded that we lack a research-informed pedagogy for formal psychotherapy education and training, and that the effectiveness of our graduate training programs is assumed largely on faith.

Page 9: The Shift from "Ordinary" to "Extraordinary" Experience in Psychodynamic Supervision

9

Binder’s Critique

He observed that clinical psychology programs customarily teach specific procedures and skills in a progression from simple to more complex performances, with an emphasis on micro-skills in which discrete teaching modules expose students to particular facets of the clinical situation and interventions (e.g., active listening, open-ended questions, etc.).   

Page 10: The Shift from "Ordinary" to "Extraordinary" Experience in Psychodynamic Supervision

10

Binder’s Critique

He stated, “It appears, however, that while these ‘micro’ components of interviewing can be effectively taught, the components do not easily gel into the more complex performance skills actually used in clinical interviewing” (Binder, 2002, p. 4).  

Page 11: The Shift from "Ordinary" to "Extraordinary" Experience in Psychodynamic Supervision

11

Binder’s Critique

Curricula expose students to theories and procedures associated with various treatment models, followed by “an abrupt transition to ‘practicing’ with real patients” (Binder, 2002, p. 5). 

Yet conceptual knowledge is not readily available to students about how a treatment is actually conducted.

Page 12: The Shift from "Ordinary" to "Extraordinary" Experience in Psychodynamic Supervision

12

Binder’s Critique

Additionally, Binder (1993) suggested that it is highly likely supervision is being conducted incompetently by many supervisors.

Page 13: The Shift from "Ordinary" to "Extraordinary" Experience in Psychodynamic Supervision

13

Negative Perceptions of Supervision

Many supervisees view supervision to be an unhelpful and, at times, a highly negative experience (Fauth et al., 2007; Ramos-Sanchez et al., 2002). 

Galante (1998), for example, found that 47% of trainees had experienced at least one ineffective supervisory relationship.

Page 14: The Shift from "Ordinary" to "Extraordinary" Experience in Psychodynamic Supervision

14

Lack of Training/Not a Distinct Professional Activity

Little formal training is offered for supervisors (Russell & Petrie, 1994) and supervision itself is not typically perceived as a distinct professional activity with its own unique processes and goals.

Page 15: The Shift from "Ordinary" to "Extraordinary" Experience in Psychodynamic Supervision

15

Stylistic Preferences and Rigidity of Roles

Many supervisors approach supervision in a vague, undetermined way (Milne & James, 2002), often resulting in their being primarily didactic or adopting a largely supportive or collegial role. 

The personality of the supervisor tends to correspond to broad supervisory styles (task-oriented, interpersonally-focused, etc.) (Freidlander & Ward, 1984; Shanfield & Gil, 1985) that unwittingly shape and determine the supervision experience.

Page 16: The Shift from "Ordinary" to "Extraordinary" Experience in Psychodynamic Supervision

16

Perpetuation of Poor Supervisory Models

Supervisors also tend to repeat the mistakes made by their own supervisors (Worthington, 1987). 

Page 17: The Shift from "Ordinary" to "Extraordinary" Experience in Psychodynamic Supervision

17

Something is not working ...

Given all of the issues, something is clearly not working in how we teach, train and supervise students and psychotherapists-in-training.  

Page 18: The Shift from "Ordinary" to "Extraordinary" Experience in Psychodynamic Supervision

18

Ladany’s “Litmus Test”

Ladany (2007) observed that we have not done a good job in determining graduate school admission criteria that reliably predict psychotherapy competence.

Page 19: The Shift from "Ordinary" to "Extraordinary" Experience in Psychodynamic Supervision

19

Ladany’s “Litmus Test”

He (2007) wrote, “It should not surprise us, then, that a decent percentage of students graduate who are not well equipped to be reasonably good therapists. A good litmus test for this supposition is to ask ourselves whether we would refer a family member (that we liked!) to a therapist whom we are graduating. I would venture a guess that about a third of the time the answer would be no” (p. 395).

Page 20: The Shift from "Ordinary" to "Extraordinary" Experience in Psychodynamic Supervision

20

But the Good News Is We Are Making Progress!

Despite these training problems and the corresponding lack of a consensual model for conceptualizing and implementing supervision, we are making significant strides!

 

Page 21: The Shift from "Ordinary" to "Extraordinary" Experience in Psychodynamic Supervision

21

Expansion of the Supervisory Function

The supervisor’s task is no longer viewed as solely didactic or focused on merely imparting technical or theoretical knowledge; instead, the supervisory function consists of numerous interrelated roles that include supportive, technical and modeling components directed toward the cultivation of a therapeutic identity (Milne and James, 2002).

Page 22: The Shift from "Ordinary" to "Extraordinary" Experience in Psychodynamic Supervision

22

Developmental Stage Models

Developmental stage models (e.g., Heppner & Roehlke, 1984; Stoltenberg & Delworth, 1987, 1988) have helped to define approaches to supervisory intervention based on the supervisee’s level of competence and experience.

Page 23: The Shift from "Ordinary" to "Extraordinary" Experience in Psychodynamic Supervision

23

Relational Emphasis

The supervisory relationship (e.g., Ekstein & Wallerstein, 1972; Hedges, in press; Watkins, 1997, 2011; Worthen & McNeil, 1996) has also been emphasized as a primary framework for understanding how complex, co-creative interpersonal patterns of interaction and enactment between supervisor and supervisee may correspond to the trainee’s relationships with her patients. 

Page 24: The Shift from "Ordinary" to "Extraordinary" Experience in Psychodynamic Supervision

24

Relational Emphasis

This emphasis reflects the notable empirical finding (which has transtheoretical implications) that, more than any other factor, the quality of the psychotherapeutic relationship remains the strongest predictor of treatment outcome (Hedges, in press; Norcross, 2002; Orlinsky et al., 1994).  

Page 25: The Shift from "Ordinary" to "Extraordinary" Experience in Psychodynamic Supervision

25

The Educational Pyramid

A triadic model (Bernstein, 1982; Seidman & Rappaport, 1974) in which the inter-relationships of the three figures of psychotherapy training (client, trainee, and supervisor) has contributed to the design of empirical research programs that assess supervision efficacy and the degree to which it actually predicts trainees’ interventions and the outcomes of their therapy cases.

Page 26: The Shift from "Ordinary" to "Extraordinary" Experience in Psychodynamic Supervision

26

Moving from Micro-Skills to Super-ordinate Goals

Micro-skills continue to be addressed in supervision yet are so within a broader set of therapeutic competencies and super-ordinate goals that more realistically reflect the professional role of therapist.

Page 27: The Shift from "Ordinary" to "Extraordinary" Experience in Psychodynamic Supervision

27

Moving from Micro-Skills to Super-ordinate Goals

For example, Binder (2002) defined 4 super-ordinate goals for the student in supervision: (1) to conceptualize clinical material; (2) to select and apply therapeutic interventions; (3) to develop professional beliefs and values; and (4) to behave ethically.  

For Binder, the best supervisors find ways to link these 4 goals into a cohesive learning experience for the trainee. 

Page 28: The Shift from "Ordinary" to "Extraordinary" Experience in Psychodynamic Supervision

28

Self-Awareness as a Therapeutic Competency

Beyond knowledge- and skill-based approaches to supervision intervention, there has been increasing interest in encouraging the supervisee’s self-awareness and ability to understand and use the self in the clinical situation (Ladany, 2007). 

Page 29: The Shift from "Ordinary" to "Extraordinary" Experience in Psychodynamic Supervision

29

Tuckett’s Three Frames

For example, in an attempt to conceptualize the competence of psychoanalytic candidates, Tuckett (2005) theorized that advanced skill level is characterized by the capacity to sustain three linked lenses or frames: (1) participant-observational, (2)conceptual and (3) interventional.

Page 30: The Shift from "Ordinary" to "Extraordinary" Experience in Psychodynamic Supervision

30

Tuckett’s Three Frames

As described by Sarnat (2010, p. 21), Tuckett (2005) defined the participant-observational frame as “ ‘the way the analyst is with the patient’ (p. 37), and emphasized the analyst’s capacity to bear and process, rather than act, on the emotional states that the patient evokes within her or him.”

Page 31: The Shift from "Ordinary" to "Extraordinary" Experience in Psychodynamic Supervision

31

Self-awareness/Use of the Self: The Lack of a Clear Pedagogic Method

Self-awareness and the use of the self in the clinical situation are contextually valid and fundamental components of therapeutic work, clearly evident in the technique of highly-skilled and experienced therapists.

But the capacity to identify and use self-experience is difficult to cultivate and refine in trainees, and often is not even approached by supervisors (due, in my opinion, to the lack of a clear pedagogic method for how to do so).

Page 32: The Shift from "Ordinary" to "Extraordinary" Experience in Psychodynamic Supervision

32

A Major But Under-emphasized Issue: “Sterile” Supervision

In my review of the supervision literature, and upon reflection on my own work and the work of my colleagues, I have often wondered if the lack of a clear pedagogic method for promoting the supervisee’s use of self-experience results in “sterile” supervision.

Page 33: The Shift from "Ordinary" to "Extraordinary" Experience in Psychodynamic Supervision

33

Sterile Supervision

Sterile supervision may be characterized by content and process factors which dilute the authentic experience of the supervisee (and of the supervisor as well), attenuating the interaction significantly and restricting the range of interpersonal experience and psychological inquiry to safe comfortable zones.

Page 34: The Shift from "Ordinary" to "Extraordinary" Experience in Psychodynamic Supervision

34

Sterile Supervision

Sterile supervision, in my opinion, arises from pressures (within the supervisee, the supervisor and/or within the institution in which treatment and supervision are occurring) toward standard forms of social etiquette and decorum that tend to predominate the supervisory interaction.

Page 35: The Shift from "Ordinary" to "Extraordinary" Experience in Psychodynamic Supervision

35

Sterile Supervision

We have all heard about or experienced supervisory sessions that seem no different in tone or content from formal business transactions or professional engagements!  

Although these modes of interaction are, at times, reasonable and appropriate for the supervisory relationship, I believe the patterned and consistent dilution of the supervision experience represents a more insidious problem.

Page 36: The Shift from "Ordinary" to "Extraordinary" Experience in Psychodynamic Supervision

36

Evidence of Sterile Supervision

For years, anecdotal evidence and empirical research have suggested that the supervisory interaction is frequently inauthentic, falsified and/or censored.  

Gabbard (2010) notes that supervisees’ presentations of clinical material are commonly filtered or distorted.

Page 37: The Shift from "Ordinary" to "Extraordinary" Experience in Psychodynamic Supervision

37

Compliance and Social Desirability

Many supervisees, of course, experience a conflict between presenting what makes them “look good” to their supervisor vs. sharing their struggles and difficulties “which may maximize the learning process but could result in a less glowing evaluation” (Gabbard, 2010, p. 193). 

Page 38: The Shift from "Ordinary" to "Extraordinary" Experience in Psychodynamic Supervision

38

Compliance and Social Desirability

In my own discussions with students and practicing professionals, some quite sophisticated, many indicate that they still feel as if they have “to be” a certain way clinically and in supervision in order to appeal to the overt and covert preferences of their supervisors or peers in consultation groups.

Page 39: The Shift from "Ordinary" to "Extraordinary" Experience in Psychodynamic Supervision

39

Empirical Evidence of Compliance in Supervision

Further, there is a growing body of research that indicates strong bidirectional processes of control, compliance/submission and social desirability in clinical supervision.   

Page 40: The Shift from "Ordinary" to "Extraordinary" Experience in Psychodynamic Supervision

40

Empirical Evidence of Compliance in Supervision

Using an intensive case study method to evaluate speech acts  throughout one semester of supervision, Martin et al. (1987) found that the supervisor being evaluated frequently acted in a controlling and assertive manner as compared to the more compliant supervisee.  

Page 41: The Shift from "Ordinary" to "Extraordinary" Experience in Psychodynamic Supervision

41

Empirical Evidence of Compliance in Supervision

Alpher (1991), in a study of short-term psychodynamic treatment, found that the interpersonal process between supervisor and trainee frequently consisted of control behaviors on the part of the supervisor and submitting behaviors on the part of the trainee.  Interestingly, these observations corresponded with additional data showing that, at times, the patient viewed the trainee-therapist to be controlling as well.   

Page 42: The Shift from "Ordinary" to "Extraordinary" Experience in Psychodynamic Supervision

42

Empirical Evidence of Compliance Supervision

Alpher (1991) also noted that as the supervisor’s controlling acts evoked a greater degree of submission on the part of the trainee, the supervision progressively became more and more narrowed in scope, with content condensing to the trainee’s requests for specific instructions from the supervisor and the articulation of the supervisor’s insights.   

Page 43: The Shift from "Ordinary" to "Extraordinary" Experience in Psychodynamic Supervision

43

Empirical Evidence of Compliance in Supervision

Alpher concluded that control and submission appear to be dominant interactive evocations in supervision, and that such evocations provide evidence of parallel process in which “interdependent transactions occur in a coherent manner across the dyads” of supervisee-supervisor and supervisee-patient (Alpher, 1991, p. 228).

Page 44: The Shift from "Ordinary" to "Extraordinary" Experience in Psychodynamic Supervision

44

Empirical Evidence of Compliance in Supervision

Alpher’s (1991) data and inferences are particularly relevant for my concerns because they imply that sterile supervision likely corresponds to sterile therapy (more on this later!).  

Page 45: The Shift from "Ordinary" to "Extraordinary" Experience in Psychodynamic Supervision

45

The Supervisor’s Social Desirability

Also contributing to sterile supervision is the need on the part of supervisors to be seen favorably by their supervisees, particularly in settings in which trainees’ ratings of supervisors are perceived by administrators as indicative of supervisor competence.

Page 46: The Shift from "Ordinary" to "Extraordinary" Experience in Psychodynamic Supervision

46

The Supervisor’s Social Desirability

Supervisors also tend to face a conflict between what they personally value as meaningful for teaching and supervision and the prevailing rules, norms and policies of the organization in which the therapy and supervision occur (Fauth et al., 2007).  

Page 47: The Shift from "Ordinary" to "Extraordinary" Experience in Psychodynamic Supervision

47

Supervisors’ Desire to Protect, Shield and Prevent Narcissistic Injury

I also believe there is a tendency among many supervisors who, conscious of trainees’ fears, naiveté, demoralization and low professional self-esteem, over-compensate by attempting to shield supervisees from common realistic challenges of the therapy situation and self-experience (e.g., narcissistic injury) often associated with the growing pains of learning the complex task of psychotherapy.

Page 48: The Shift from "Ordinary" to "Extraordinary" Experience in Psychodynamic Supervision

48

Supervisors’ Desire to Protect, Shield and Prevent Narcissistic Injury

I once heard a story of a supervisor who, when the potential to add family therapy as a treatment modality in the training clinic where he work was discussed, vehemently argued against the idea.

He felt trainees were having enough difficulty with individual therapy and anticipated that the complexity of family therapy would be overwhelming.   

Page 49: The Shift from "Ordinary" to "Extraordinary" Experience in Psychodynamic Supervision

49

An Implicit Rule: “We have a very nice relationship …”

An additional factor contributing to sterile supervision is the mutual avoidance of conflict or dissonance in the supervisory relationship. 

Recihelt and Skjerva (2002, p. 770) claim that an implicit rule is often embedded in the supervisory process and mutually reinforced by both supervisor and trainee: “We have a very nice relationship, and do not want to say or do anything that may make it less pleasant” (as cited by Binder, 2002, p. 18).

Page 50: The Shift from "Ordinary" to "Extraordinary" Experience in Psychodynamic Supervision

50

The Avoidance of “Touchy Issues”

Similarly, Lizzio et al. (2009, p. 129) observed about the supervisor’s role: “However, it is not only important to provide support, but also to do so at an appropriate level. While a perceived lack of supervisor support can have negative consequences for supervision, too much support, in the absence of other important supervisory relating behaviours, can also inhibit the effectiveness of supervision. For example, if a supervisor is

Page 51: The Shift from "Ordinary" to "Extraordinary" Experience in Psychodynamic Supervision

51

The Avoidance of “Touchy Issues”

overly concerned with ‘being supportive’ they may become too permissive and not address ‘touchy issues’ such as supervisee competence or performance. This can result in a ‘phoney’ supervision relationship where the needs of the client are relegated behind the supervisor’s need for acceptance and approval or their avoidance of conflict ...”

Page 52: The Shift from "Ordinary" to "Extraordinary" Experience in Psychodynamic Supervision

52

Toward a Definition of “Ordinary” Experience

The many factors contributing to sterile supervision suggest the potential for a patterned interpersonal dynamic between supervisee and supervisor restricted to conventional forms of relatedness.

Page 53: The Shift from "Ordinary" to "Extraordinary" Experience in Psychodynamic Supervision

53

Toward a Definition of “Ordinary” Experience

In this conventional relatedness, discomfort, tensions and anxieties are suppressed or avoided via numerous conscious and unconscious activities falling within a profile of affirmation, decorum, censorship, politeness, rapport, compliance and social desirability (i.e., the “ordinary”).

Page 54: The Shift from "Ordinary" to "Extraordinary" Experience in Psychodynamic Supervision

54

Toward a Definition of “Ordinary” Experience

Phony or sterile supervision is facilitated by the supervisor and trainee colluding so as to reside within a sanctioned safe zone relegated to a fundamentally ordinary relatedness to which both parties are well-accustomed.

Page 55: The Shift from "Ordinary" to "Extraordinary" Experience in Psychodynamic Supervision

55

The Press Toward the Ordinary

Unfortunately, many of our training institutions embody a culture of ordinary relatedness that fails our students and supervisees in numerous ways, including not socializing trainees to the potential power of a true therapeutic environment unencumbered by the restrictions of social mores.

Page 56: The Shift from "Ordinary" to "Extraordinary" Experience in Psychodynamic Supervision

56

The Press Toward the Ordinary

Relegation to the ordinary in sterile supervision does not engage the trainee in an “interpersonal atmosphere for generating an appreciation of the power of the professional relationship itself” (Hedges, in press), especially the pursuit of self-experience that may be controversial or viewed as inappropriate when conceived of in the context of typical social discourse.

Page 57: The Shift from "Ordinary" to "Extraordinary" Experience in Psychodynamic Supervision

57

The Press Toward the Ordinary

Consequently, activating the trainee’s self-awareness/use of self in the clinical situation is not really possible because it is not activated in the process of supervision; self-experience is largely censored in supervision as supervision becomes categorically associated with standard social discourse.

In this way, the trainee is not provided with a relational experience that adheres to the distinct self- and self-other relatedness that characterizes a psychoanalytically-informed model. 

Page 58: The Shift from "Ordinary" to "Extraordinary" Experience in Psychodynamic Supervision

58

The Press Toward the Ordinary

I think the press toward the ordinary may be due, at least in part, to a misguided exaggerated use of the conclusions drawn from the large body of work on the relational paradigm (e.g., Bordin, 1983; Frawley-O’Dea & Sarnat, 2008; Gill, 2001; Hedges, in press; Ladany, 2004; Watkins, 2011).

 

Page 59: The Shift from "Ordinary" to "Extraordinary" Experience in Psychodynamic Supervision

59

The Press Toward the Ordinary

Emphasis on the alliance often becomes reduced conceptually and interactively (both by supervisor and supervisee) to an exaggerated focus on rapport-building and the avoidance of discomfort, conflict and distress -- at the expense of other vital elements of the therapeutic process.

Page 60: The Shift from "Ordinary" to "Extraordinary" Experience in Psychodynamic Supervision

60

The Press Toward the Ordinary

Many supervisors also seem to fundamentally misconstrue what will ultimately promote the supervisee’s self-assuredness, confidence and deeper learning (Lizzio et al., 2005; Ronnesttad & Skovholy, 1993); standard forms of assurance and corrective feedback seem less productive in this regard than exploring and legitimizing the supervisee’s experience of learning to be a therapist.

Page 61: The Shift from "Ordinary" to "Extraordinary" Experience in Psychodynamic Supervision

61

My Central Thesis

My main point thus far is that due to benign and protective motives on the part of many supervisors, as well as more insidious processes of control, submission and compliance in supervision, the supervisee’s subjective experience as therapist,learner and person may be ordinarily

thwarted.

Page 62: The Shift from "Ordinary" to "Extraordinary" Experience in Psychodynamic Supervision

62

My Central Thesis

Overly-protecting, supporting or instructing the supervisee can have the unintended consequence of ultimately invalidating her self-experience; yet the ability to access and use self-experience is a crucial therapeutic competence and serves as both an anchor and compass for negotiating the challenges of actual clinical work.

Page 63: The Shift from "Ordinary" to "Extraordinary" Experience in Psychodynamic Supervision

63

Being “Supported Away”

Many of the supervisees I encounter are discouraged or demoralized because their own views have seldom been inquired about or allowed to stand as valid sentiments in supervision (e.g., a supervisee once told me she felt like most of her concerns as a therapist-in-training had been “supported away”).

Page 64: The Shift from "Ordinary" to "Extraordinary" Experience in Psychodynamic Supervision

64

Humility: A Rite of Passage in Training

A common issue for many trainees is their newly-emerging realization that they cannot combat or overcome the severity and refractory nature of the dilemmas and characterological problems in patients who present for treatment.

 

Page 65: The Shift from "Ordinary" to "Extraordinary" Experience in Psychodynamic Supervision

65

Drama of the Gifted Child

This realization is especially unbearable for some students who are encountering, perhaps for the first time, the limitations of their long-held proclivity to heal, a proclivity born in their own personal histories and that prompted a way of being in the world which inspired their very entry into the mental health profession (e.g., Alice Miller’s Drama of the Gifted Child); feelings related to this cannot and should not be supported away!

Page 66: The Shift from "Ordinary" to "Extraordinary" Experience in Psychodynamic Supervision

66

Emulation of the Ordinary

Exposure to sterile supervision leaves the supervisee with a constricted perspective of therapeutic relatedness.

A natural consequence is the supervisee’s proclivity to emulate the “ordinary” with her own psychotherapy patients, manifested in similar or identical forms of tension reduction, avoidance and conformity/control/submission dynamics embedded in the supervisory process.

Page 67: The Shift from "Ordinary" to "Extraordinary" Experience in Psychodynamic Supervision

67

My Approach: The Shift to Extraordinary Experience

The pedagogic principle I am proposing is that psychodynamic supervision should facilitate in the supervisee a transition from common forms of social discourse and convention including conflict avoidance, compliance and social desirability (“ordinary” experience) to an alternative form of relatedness that inherently values an ambience of inquiry, uncensored subjectivity and acceptance (“extraordinary” experience).

Page 68: The Shift from "Ordinary" to "Extraordinary" Experience in Psychodynamic Supervision

68

Supervision as “Metaphoric Experience”

The traditional notion that personal therapy is the best way to gain self-awareness and one of the best ways to learn how to actually do psychotherapy (Ladany, 2007, p. 393) is a bit misguided, from my standpoint.

Instead, I believe the supervisory experience can provide a “metaphoric experience” of the dynamic therapy situation, which, at its core, revolves around one mind attempting to make contact with and understand deeply the mind of another.

Page 69: The Shift from "Ordinary" to "Extraordinary" Experience in Psychodynamic Supervision

69

Supervision as “Metaphoric Experience”

This sentiment is reflected in Sarnat’s writings:  “Although the supervisory and clinical tasks are different, the supervisor demonstrates competencies in supervising that are closely related to those she is striving to develop in her supervisee” (Sarnat, 2010, p. 26).

Page 70: The Shift from "Ordinary" to "Extraordinary" Experience in Psychodynamic Supervision

70

The Supervisee’s Self-Experience

The supervisee is seen not as a narcissistically vulnerable figure who needs consistent support and cheerleading, but as a maturing professional whose therapeutic identity will be promoted primarily by a close inspection and understanding

of her particular experience.

Page 71: The Shift from "Ordinary" to "Extraordinary" Experience in Psychodynamic Supervision

71

The Supervisee’s Self-Experience

Therefore, in my view, it is the supervisor’s primary task to explore extensively the supervisee’s self-experience with relative abstinence in order to (1) affirm its validity and (2) model for the supervisee a mode of “being with” another’s experience.

Page 72: The Shift from "Ordinary" to "Extraordinary" Experience in Psychodynamic Supervision

72

The Supervisee’s Self-Experience

As in psychotherapy, this approach assumes that due to a variety of interpersonal and intrapsychic factors there will be resistances to the expression, examination and tolerance of the supervisee’s uniquely personal experience.

Page 73: The Shift from "Ordinary" to "Extraordinary" Experience in Psychodynamic Supervision

73

My Primary Task As Supervisor

Therefore, I see my primary task as one of coaxing into expression the supervisee’s self-experience; my sense is that if the supervisor's self-experience cannot be engaged and validated, then meta-cognitive competencies underlying psychodynamic psychotherapy including the use of the self, intuition, pattern recognition, spontaneity and self-assuredness will not be promoted. 

Page 74: The Shift from "Ordinary" to "Extraordinary" Experience in Psychodynamic Supervision

74

Supervision Vignette

• A supervisee, in a practicum placement at a university psychology clinic, discusses her patient who has recently no-showed for a session; the supervisee begins to reflect on what it has been like for her to work with this particular patient; in one supervision session, she says, “I find myself oscillating between being my self and being a professional self, and this makes me feel anxious, not in balance.

Page 75: The Shift from "Ordinary" to "Extraordinary" Experience in Psychodynamic Supervision

75

Supervision Vignette

• When I am too much the professional me, I become blocked in my thoughts, in my perceptions and in my freedom during sessions. Often, I get this way with her. With other clients, I am more natural and there seems to be a balance of the real me and the professional me. I find myself and I find a professional identity almost at the same time.

Page 76: The Shift from "Ordinary" to "Extraordinary" Experience in Psychodynamic Supervision

76

Supervision Vignette

• But with her, I get kind of defensive. I don’t think I really am all that defensive in actuality, I just feel it. At those times, I become too much of a therapy-me. Again, it’s the issue of feeling too much of one vs. too much of the other. But at other times with her I get too reactive and I become too much me. It’s strange. I am unable to integrate this all into one me. Wow! That’s cool. (I inquire about what’s cool.)

Page 77: The Shift from "Ordinary" to "Extraordinary" Experience in Psychodynamic Supervision

77

Supervision Vignette

• I didn’t realize this all before. Just describing it really helps. It’s not really anxiety, now that I reflect on it, it’s just that with her I sometimes get uncomfortable ... Yeah, this is cool. (Cool?) Just the fact that I am seeing how I am with her, naming the way I feel when I am with her. I have not been able to describe it before or even identity it. So you’re helping me capture it now.

Page 78: The Shift from "Ordinary" to "Extraordinary" Experience in Psychodynamic Supervision

78

Supervision Vignette

• Sometimes I’ll be more spontaneous, the natural me, but I feel like it’s too much me with her … Yeah, I’ve read about stuff like this, I’ve had courses where it’s been talked about, but to actually experience it is exciting, it’s extraordinary, really. I’m actually experiencing it, I am in it, rather than just reading about it. I am seeing myself as I am with her.

Page 79: The Shift from "Ordinary" to "Extraordinary" Experience in Psychodynamic Supervision

79

Supervision Vignette

• I blurt this all out to you now, without really thinking about it or organizing it. I guess I am allowing myself to be spontaneous with you, which is ironic as I am talking about not being able to be that way with her. That’s funny, really. With her, when I allow myself to be spontaneous I feel like it bleeds into being impulsive, and when that happens, I get really restrictive and rigid again.

Page 80: The Shift from "Ordinary" to "Extraordinary" Experience in Psychodynamic Supervision

80

Supervision Vignette

• I then become my professional self, and I think that makes me withdraw from her. I feel a distance between her and me and I can’t connect with her, it’s a kind of psychological distance. When I am more me-me, I feel like her buddy, I feel closer to her and comfortable with her, the way I’d be with someone I know and am close to. I seem to be one way or the other with her.

Page 81: The Shift from "Ordinary" to "Extraordinary" Experience in Psychodynamic Supervision

81

Supervision Vignette

• And I guess this all isn’t really a bad thing, I’m just putting it into words. This is really exciting. (It’s exciting because?) It’s exciting because the person who did the original assessment on her described her as borderline. I am not sure about that view of her, but I obviously feel a certain split and maybe it has to do with something in the patient or with something in me in being with her. I don’t know. I just don’t know.

Page 82: The Shift from "Ordinary" to "Extraordinary" Experience in Psychodynamic Supervision

82

Supervision Vignette

• At some point in my last session with her, I couldn't bring myself to tell her what I really wanted to say. I was fighting back the natural me and I don’t know why; maybe it was because I have some fear of expressing the natural me. That if I did, I would be in trouble somehow. I would easily say what I was thinking to a friend, but with her I didn’t sense she could tolerate or use what I wanted to say, so I just held onto my ideas.

Page 83: The Shift from "Ordinary" to "Extraordinary" Experience in Psychodynamic Supervision

83

Supervision Vignette

• So there’s this professional me and a natural me, and I am realizing as I talk to you that this is all a part of me getting to know her. Just thinking about it is really helpful. This is all a bit of a roller coaster ride. (Roller coaster?) Extreme, intense. But it’s nice to just be able to ramble on about it all. Talking about it and verbalizing my thoughts are really good. And you seem to be able to prod me along.”

Page 84: The Shift from "Ordinary" to "Extraordinary" Experience in Psychodynamic Supervision

84

Evidence of the Supervisee’s Growth: Reduced Fear of “Expressing the Natural Me”

This supervisee began working with me with a heightened degree of self-consciousness and self-criticality, along with a constant worry that she wasn’t “doing it” right.  

Page 85: The Shift from "Ordinary" to "Extraordinary" Experience in Psychodynamic Supervision

85

Evidence of the Supervisee’s Growth: Reduced Fear of “Expressing the Natural Me”

For a long time, she would not even directly expose me to her work (via listening to audiotaped recordings of sessions) and I often felt that our sessions were overly cordial and inauthentic (she was, I believe, “fighting back the natural me” with me). This clearly has changed!

Page 86: The Shift from "Ordinary" to "Extraordinary" Experience in Psychodynamic Supervision

86

Evidence of the Supervisee’s Growth: Reduced Fear of “Expressing the Natural Me”

She now approaches her own reflections in supervision without judgment, although fears of “doing something wrong” with her patient still remain; but she observes that her ideas and feelings, and the troubling dynamics with her patient, are not necessarily “bad,” just a part of how she is getting to know and understand her patient.

Page 87: The Shift from "Ordinary" to "Extraordinary" Experience in Psychodynamic Supervision

87

Evidence of the Supervisee’s Growth: Awe and Disinhibition

The clinical process previously made her extremely anxious, clearly not excited, and she certainly didn’t view it with any wonder or awe as she does now. 

Now, she is remarkably spontaneous with me, free to blurt out things and eager to find meaning in what she allows herself to put forth.  

Page 88: The Shift from "Ordinary" to "Extraordinary" Experience in Psychodynamic Supervision

88

Evidence of the Supervisee’s Growth: Increasing Autonomy and Fewer Preoccupations

Before, she seemed to rely heavily on me and other prior supervisors for direction.  

Now, she is relatively autonomous in a large portion of her work, and she seems content to use supervision primarily as a space for her to identify her self-experience without being preoccupied with the need to determine meaning or formulate interventions.

Page 89: The Shift from "Ordinary" to "Extraordinary" Experience in Psychodynamic Supervision

89

Evidence of the Supervisee’s Growth: Recognition of the Patient’s Character Structure and Relational Dynamics

While the supervisee previously seemed to objectify her patient (she tended to “fit” the patient to a theoretical idea or intervention), she is now beginning to appreciate the complexity of her patient’s character structure and how it impacts their relational connection.

Page 90: The Shift from "Ordinary" to "Extraordinary" Experience in Psychodynamic Supervision

90

Evidence of the Supervisee’s Growth: Recognition of the Patient’s Character Structure and Relational Dynamics

This development reflects Sarnat’s (2010, p. 20) view:“Effective psychodynamic intervention is derived from what the psychotherapist has experienced, processed, and conceptualized about the relationship with the client and about the client’s internal object world.”

Page 91: The Shift from "Ordinary" to "Extraordinary" Experience in Psychodynamic Supervision

91

Evidence of the Supervisee’s Growth: Emergence of a Therapeutic Identity

Previously, the supervisee seemed to lack a professional-therapeutic identity; her interventions were frequently impulsive and raw or, conversely, had the quality of mimicking what she thought a therapist should do/say.

Page 92: The Shift from "Ordinary" to "Extraordinary" Experience in Psychodynamic Supervision

92

Evidence of the Supervisee’s Growth: Emergence of a Therapeutic Identity

Now, her progress is striking: she is clearly formulating a more substantive therapeutic identity (manifested in her naming of and reckoning with it) and is devoting attention to issues and drawbacks re: integrating her personal and therapeutic proclivities and attitudes.

Page 93: The Shift from "Ordinary" to "Extraordinary" Experience in Psychodynamic Supervision

93

Evidence of the Supervisee’s Growth: A Shift Out of the Ordinary

In the emergence of her therapeutic identity, she is beginning to recognize moments when she fears expressing something to her patient (often represented in the guise of what the patient is believed not to be able to tolerate).

In my view, this represents a crucial progression: she is essentially acknowledging for the first time the possible adherence to “ordinary” relatedness that is infiltrating her burgeoning therapeutic identity

Page 94: The Shift from "Ordinary" to "Extraordinary" Experience in Psychodynamic Supervision

94

Evidence of the Supervisee’s Growth: A Shift Out of the Ordinary

It is an interesting paradox (not just for this supervisee, but for many others) that in one of the most intimate of all settings -- the therapeutic situation, the expression of the natural me (or “me-me”) is often inhibited, perhaps due to various conscious and unconscious assumptions about therapy and about the therapist’s role that reflect the censorship of standard decorum.

Page 95: The Shift from "Ordinary" to "Extraordinary" Experience in Psychodynamic Supervision

95

Evidence of the Supervisee’s Growth: A Shift Out of the Ordinary

My supervisee, though, is clearly in transition on this, which represents movement out of the ordinary.

She is beginning to realize the potential for a greater degree of intimacy with her client in the clinical situation, as well as its risks.

This likely reflects a greater degree of freedom and intimacy she felt toward me in supervision.

Page 96: The Shift from "Ordinary" to "Extraordinary" Experience in Psychodynamic Supervision

96

Evidence of the Supervisee’s Growth: A Shift Out of the Ordinary

She now appears invested in creating an ambience with patients and within herself that is “extraordinary,” i.e., it is fundamentally different from how she typically is in her “real life.”

Page 97: The Shift from "Ordinary" to "Extraordinary" Experience in Psychodynamic Supervision

97

Evidence of the Supervisee’s Growth: A Shift Out of the Ordinary

More specifically, this ambience consists of the supervisee’s newly conscious awareness of the desire to relate and express, as well as the willingness to be related to and reflect on this relatedness.

Page 98: The Shift from "Ordinary" to "Extraordinary" Experience in Psychodynamic Supervision

98

Evidence of the Supervisee’s Growth: A Shift Out of the Ordinary

Further, she is newly cautious about introducing her own personhood too impulsively into the clinical situation.    

At the same time, she also is attending to reasons why elements of her spontaneity (her “natural me”) do not yet comfortably carry over into her relationship with her patient (e.g., Renik, 1996, 1999).

Page 99: The Shift from "Ordinary" to "Extraordinary" Experience in Psychodynamic Supervision

99

Evidence of the Supervisee’s Growth: A Shift Out of the Ordinary

This suggests the need in ongoing supervision to examine lingering reservations and fears of deeper, more intimate contact with patients unencumbered by social convention in which she can be more “real” (Renik, 1999).

Page 100: The Shift from "Ordinary" to "Extraordinary" Experience in Psychodynamic Supervision

100

Techniques and Guiding Principles

In conclusion, I would like to propose 6 supervisory techniques and guiding principles emerging from my work with this student and other supervisees like her that has informed my approach.  

Page 101: The Shift from "Ordinary" to "Extraordinary" Experience in Psychodynamic Supervision

101

Techniques and Guiding Principles: (1.) Limit Convention and Compliance/Social Desirability

Fundamentally, I attempt to create an atmosphere in supervision relatively devoid of aspects of social convention that obstruct the supervisee’s exposure to an alternative form of relatedness consisting of freedom of self-expression and a reduced focus on appealing to the other.

Page 102: The Shift from "Ordinary" to "Extraordinary" Experience in Psychodynamic Supervision

102

Techniques and Guiding Principles: (1.) Limit Convention and Compliance/Social Desirability

For example, I directly observe to the supervisee “ordinary” social phenomena as it occurs (both in relation to me and between the trainee and her client), and I invite an exploration of its purpose and utility within the clinical situation as well as within supervision.

Page 103: The Shift from "Ordinary" to "Extraordinary" Experience in Psychodynamic Supervision

103

Techniques and Guiding Principles: (1.) Limit Convention and Compliance/Social Desirability

Head nodding in standard social discourse is an easily recognizable example of the many forms of social convention to which I attempt to sensitize the supervisee; therapists-in-training often cue their patients (and their supervisors) with head nods.  

Page 104: The Shift from "Ordinary" to "Extraordinary" Experience in Psychodynamic Supervision

104

Techniques and Guiding Principles: (1.) Limit Convention and Compliance/Social Desirability

I work hard to sensitize the supervisee to this social convention and how it, like many other conventional behaviors, generally promotes restricted (“ordinary”) relational experience that inhibits the more expansive, wide-ranging and uncensored quality of the distinctive therapeutic experience we are seeking to potentiate.

Page 105: The Shift from "Ordinary" to "Extraordinary" Experience in Psychodynamic Supervision

105

Techniques and Guiding Principles:(1.) Limit Convention and Compliance/Social Desirability

Many supervisees have reported to me how striking and productive it is when they begin to practice not returning the head nods of their patients (or not do offer a head nod themselves!) -- which often promotes important discussions in supervision of traditional analytic notions of abstinence and neutrality and their continued relevance. 

Page 106: The Shift from "Ordinary" to "Extraordinary" Experience in Psychodynamic Supervision

106

Techniques and Guiding Principles: (1.) Limit Convention and Compliance/Social Desirability

Similarly, I try to sensitize the supervisee to a host of dynamics and events between themselves and their clients (including violations of the frame, hypervigilance re: the other’s discomfort, fears of not being liked or viewed as good/helpful, avoidance tactics, rigid unconditional positive regard, etc.) that may represent adherences to social convention and a loyalty to ordinary personas within the trainee as well as her patient.

Page 107: The Shift from "Ordinary" to "Extraordinary" Experience in Psychodynamic Supervision

107

Techniques and Guiding Principles:(1.) Limit Convention and Compliance/Social Desirability

As supervision proceeds, I hope to continue to engender in the supervisee a relinquishment of her “ordinary persona” which may be characterized by an array of previously unexamined attitudes and tendencies.

Simultaneously, I aim to cultivate an alternative therapeutic persona.

Page 108: The Shift from "Ordinary" to "Extraordinary" Experience in Psychodynamic Supervision

108

Techniques and Guiding Principles:(2.) “Don’t just do something, sit there!”

As a central supervisory technique, my listening approach is primarily neutral/abstinent, embodying the spirit of “Don’t just do something, sit there!” (Alonso & Rutan, 1996). 

Page 109: The Shift from "Ordinary" to "Extraordinary" Experience in Psychodynamic Supervision

109

Techniques and Guiding Principles:(2.) “Don’t just do something, sit there!”

As I listen, I hope to model a “self-reflective capacity” (Sarnat, 2010, p. 24) in which I demonstrate a highly attuned experiencing of the supervisee and what she is telling me.

I am also attempting to expose the supervisee to the fact that this capacity is not usually all that concerned with reactivity or action “of an automatic, habitual pattern” (i.e., that often constitutes “ordinary” experience).

Page 110: The Shift from "Ordinary" to "Extraordinary" Experience in Psychodynamic Supervision

110

Techniques and Guiding Principles:(2.) “Don’t just do something, sit there!”

Occasionally I will offer questions and educative instruction, and will self-disclose, but I generally maintain a stance of listening, experiencing and reflecting.

I also attempt to limit discussions of highly abstract theoretical concepts and a “Q and A” rhythm to supervisory sessions, which more often than not reinforces the supervisee’s dependency and impedes self-agency.   

Page 111: The Shift from "Ordinary" to "Extraordinary" Experience in Psychodynamic Supervision

111

Techniques and Guiding Principles: (3.) Promote Mindfulness Via the Extraordinary

In listening to and experiencing the supervisee, I attempt to model a residence in the “extraordinary” promoted by the meta-cognitive skill known as “mindfulness” (i.e., the moment-to-moment awareness of one’s experience) (e.g., Binder, 2002, 2004; Fauth et al., 2007; Germer, 2005; Safran & Muran, 2000, 2001).

Page 112: The Shift from "Ordinary" to "Extraordinary" Experience in Psychodynamic Supervision

112

Techniques and Guiding Principles: (3.) Promote Mindfulness Via the Extraordinary

“... psychotherapist mindfulness represents ... sustained attention toward the immediate experience of the session, accompanied by an attitude of acceptance and compassion, as opposed to judgment, toward all that arises” (Fauth et al., 2007, pp. 386-387). 

Page 113: The Shift from "Ordinary" to "Extraordinary" Experience in Psychodynamic Supervision

113

Techniques and Guiding Principles: (3.) Promote Mindfulness Via the Extraordinary

Bishop et al. (2004, p. 235) indicated that “in a state of mindfulness, thoughts and feelings are observed as events in the mind, without over identifying with them and without reacting to them in an automatic, habitual pattern of reactivity” (as cited by Fauth et al., 2007, p. 387).  

Page 114: The Shift from "Ordinary" to "Extraordinary" Experience in Psychodynamic Supervision

114

Techniques and Guiding Principles: (3.) Promote Mindfulness Via the Extraordinary

As I listen mindfully to the supervisee, I hope to provide a metaphoric experience in which the supervisee feels closely attended to, not judged or acted upon, and begins to experience the moment-to-moment process of supervision as a process in and of itself worthy of investigation and inquiry (rather than supervision merely being a mandatory appointment in which therapy sessions are reviewed and evaluated).

Page 115: The Shift from "Ordinary" to "Extraordinary" Experience in Psychodynamic Supervision

115

Techniques and Guiding Principles:(4.) Attend to Shame

The experience of shame in therapists, particularly those early in their careers, is ubiquitous (i.e., the therapist wants to help or cure the patient and fails). Yet, to my knowledge, shame in not extensively addressed in the supervision literature. 

Page 116: The Shift from "Ordinary" to "Extraordinary" Experience in Psychodynamic Supervision

116

Techniques and Guiding Principles:(4.) Attend to Shame

Shame is a universal human experience that has been conceptualized in numerous ways (e.g., Alonso & Rutan, 1988; Gans & Weber, 2000; Nathanson, 1987). 

With regard to supervision, the perspective on shame I am most aligned with is the affective experience arising from the failure to achieve a desired response from an important object (Alonso & Rutan, 1988); for the trainee, this important object is her patient.

Page 117: The Shift from "Ordinary" to "Extraordinary" Experience in Psychodynamic Supervision

117

Techniques and Guiding Principles:(4.) Attend to Shame

Winnicott’s (1969, 1975) distinction between object “usage” vs. “relatedness” is relevant here.

Page 118: The Shift from "Ordinary" to "Extraordinary" Experience in Psychodynamic Supervision

118

Techniques and Guiding Principles:(4.) Attend to Shame

The supervisor gradually begins to realize that she is not acting on the patient so much as being acted upon by the patient (via the specific quality of object-relatedness the patient needs to enact).

The same could be said for supervision: the supervisor is acted upon by the trainee and must accept this fate!

Page 119: The Shift from "Ordinary" to "Extraordinary" Experience in Psychodynamic Supervision

119

Techniques and Guiding Principles:(4.) Attend to Shame

The supervisee often struggles with the fact that patients will not necessarily “use” them in the ways she would typically like (“ordinary” relatendess).

What’s more, the supervisee faces the additional challenge of accepting Winnicott’s vital observation that the patient needs to destroy the object before it can be used.  

Page 120: The Shift from "Ordinary" to "Extraordinary" Experience in Psychodynamic Supervision

120

Techniques and Guiding Principles:(4.) Attend to Shame

Thus, shame is a predominant affective response as the supervisee acknowledges these emerging dilemmas and becomes more aware of her reluctance, and corresponding attitudinal and behavioral responses, to being related to (not used) by the patient.

Page 121: The Shift from "Ordinary" to "Extraordinary" Experience in Psychodynamic Supervision

121

Techniques and Guiding Principles:(5.) Dispel Expectations of Progress and Social Comparison

I try to dispel the trainee’s expectations about where she thinks she “should be” in terms of development and skill level, especially when comparisons with peers are routinely made. 

Similarly, I try to directly challenge     the supervisee’s vision of her     patients – these often reflect    curative fantasies and a     narcissistic desire to heal.  

Page 122: The Shift from "Ordinary" to "Extraordinary" Experience in Psychodynamic Supervision

122

Techniques and Guiding Principles:(5.) Dispel Expectations of Progress and Social Comparison

My attempt here is to socialize the supervisee into a view of herself and her development as unique and acceptable, just as therapy is a forum for the patient to define and contend with his/her individuality.

Comparisons with others, then, represent another form of conventionality and “ordinary” experience I am attempting to free the supervisee from.  

Page 123: The Shift from "Ordinary" to "Extraordinary" Experience in Psychodynamic Supervision

123

Techniques and Guiding Principles:(5.) Dispel Expectations of Progress and Social Comparison

In a similar vein, I make ongoing attempts to disengage the trainee from my own value system and clinical approach; e.g., supervisees often ask me, “Is that what you would do?,” and I respond, “It doesn’t matter what I would do – you and I are different.”  

More often than not, this drives home the point that all interventions are motivated by some element of our unique personhoods which simultaneously may limit and expand our potential with particular clients. 

Page 124: The Shift from "Ordinary" to "Extraordinary" Experience in Psychodynamic Supervision

124

Techniques and Guiding Principles:(6.) Promote Acceptance of Unconscious Relational Forces

I attempt to downplay standard views of and conventional opinions on therapeutic course and action; instead, I emphasize an acceptance of what is occurring in the clinical process as reported by the supervisee, especially its thorny and unclear nature, and the ongoing evaluation of its many potential meanings.

Page 125: The Shift from "Ordinary" to "Extraordinary" Experience in Psychodynamic Supervision

125

Techniques and Guiding Principles:(6.) Promote Acceptance of Unconscious Relational Forces

To expand on this idea, I attempt to move the supervisee away from “inert clinical knowledge” (Binder, 2002, p. 11) and, instead, encourage  her to become her own repository of clinical experience, including all failures and achievements, intentions and outcomes.

This hopefully marks the transition from Am I doing it right? or Do you agree with what I did? to This is what happened between us at that moment.

Page 126: The Shift from "Ordinary" to "Extraordinary" Experience in Psychodynamic Supervision

126

Techniques and Guiding Principles:(5.) Promote Acceptance of Unconscious Relational Forces

To this end, in supervision I often claim that “there are no mistakes in therapy” to encourage supervisees to move past a right/ wrong approach to their work and begin to appreciate the mutually co-constructed unconscious dynamics between client and therapist that profoundly impact how each thinks, feels and acts upon the other.

Page 127: The Shift from "Ordinary" to "Extraordinary" Experience in Psychodynamic Supervision

127

Techniques and Guiding Principles:(5.) Promote Acceptance of Unconscious Relational Forces

For example, trainees are often terrified as they begin to see clearly, from the perch of supervision, how they have “acted out” with their patients countertransferentially.  

Acknowledging the strength and complexity of unconscious relational forces is initially startling for many trainees, but gradually these forces become viewed more benignly as constituents of psychoanalytically-informed treatment. 

Page 128: The Shift from "Ordinary" to "Extraordinary" Experience in Psychodynamic Supervision

128

Techniques and Guiding Principles:(6.) Pursue “Professional Me”/“Natural Me” Tensions

Finally, I actively conceptualize the learning process for trainees as contending with the emerging tensions of disparity and integration vis-a-vis the “professional me” and the “natural me” in their clinical work.

Page 129: The Shift from "Ordinary" to "Extraordinary" Experience in Psychodynamic Supervision

129

Techniques and Guiding Principles:(6.) Pursue “Professional Me”/“Natural Me” Tensions

Pragmatically, this often translates into encouraging inhibited supervisees to bring into sessions more of their “natural me,” and encouraging disinhibited supervisees to develop a greater degree of caution.

Page 130: The Shift from "Ordinary" to "Extraordinary" Experience in Psychodynamic Supervision

130

Techniques and Guiding Principles:(6.) Pursue “Professional Me”/“Natural Me” Tensions

At a deeper level, it fosters an exploration of how the supervisee may be unwittingly exposed to herself, her patient (Aaron, 1991; Hoffman, 1983) and her supervisor in the course of psychotherapy and training, how to tolerate these exposures, and how to make use of them clinically.   

Page 131: The Shift from "Ordinary" to "Extraordinary" Experience in Psychodynamic Supervision

131

Techniques and Guiding Principles:(6.) Pursue “Professional Me”/“Natural Me” Tensions

Finally, a consideration of these tensions hopefully stimulates and encourages the trainee’s career-long analysis of the ways in which her professional role actually mobilizes (does not obstruct) profoundly intimate contact with patients unattainable in any other social realm.

Page 132: The Shift from "Ordinary" to "Extraordinary" Experience in Psychodynamic Supervision

132

Summary

Given the unchartered territory of psychotherapy, supervisees typically rely on what has worked for them so far in their personal and professional lives (i.e., conventional attitudes and relational tendencies), many of which are non-transferrable and often disadvantageous for psychoanalytically-informed psychotherapy. 

Page 133: The Shift from "Ordinary" to "Extraordinary" Experience in Psychodynamic Supervision

133

Summary

In this presentation, I have outlined an approach to supervision that seeks to engender in the supervisee an attitudinal and behavioral shift from “ordinary” (i.e., the restrictions of social convention) to “extraordinary” experience in which the patient's subjectivity, and that of the therapist-in-training as well, is authentically expressed, acknowledged and understood.  

Page 134: The Shift from "Ordinary" to "Extraordinary" Experience in Psychodynamic Supervision

134

Summary

For the many reasons I have described, both supervisee and supervisor may collude in a press for the ordinary which detracts from exposing the supervisee to an alternative mode of self- and self-other relatedness akin to the psychoanalytic model.  

Consequently, qualities of sterile supervision are often emulated and transferred into the trainee’s work with her own patients. 

Page 135: The Shift from "Ordinary" to "Extraordinary" Experience in Psychodynamic Supervision

135

Summary

My supervisory approach argues that an invaluable function of the supervisor is to model a way of being that transcends standard forms of social etiquette.

In this way, internal representations not only of the supervisor as role model (Gabbard, 2010; Gitterman, 1972), but of the relational experience the supervisor enacted with the trainee, will support the supervisee's ultimate therapeutic potential. 

Page 136: The Shift from "Ordinary" to "Extraordinary" Experience in Psychodynamic Supervision

136

Discussion and Evaluation

The Shift from “Ordinary” to “Extraordinary” Experience in Psychodynamic Supervision

 James Tobin, Ph.D. 

Private Practice, Newport Beach, CA  Assistant Professor of Clinical Psychology, Argosy 

University, Orange County, CAphone: 949-338-4388

web: www.jamestobinphd.comemail: [email protected]  

Page 137: The Shift from "Ordinary" to "Extraordinary" Experience in Psychodynamic Supervision

137

References

Ablon, S., & Jones, E. (2005).  On analytic process.  Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 53, 541-568.  

Alonso, A., & Rutan, J.S. (1988).  The experience of shame and the restoration of self-respect in group therapy.  International Journal of Group Psychotherapy, 38, 3-14.  

Alonso, A., & Rutan, J.S. (1996).  Activity/nonactivity and the group therapist: “Don’t just do something, sit there!”  Group, 20, 43-55. 

Alpher, V.S. (1991).  Interdependence and parallel processes: A case study of structural analysis of social behavior in supervision and short-term dynamic psychotherapy.  Psychotherapy, 28, 218-231.  

Aron, L. (1991).  The patient’s experience of the analyst’s subjectivity.  Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 1, 29-51.  

Bernstein, G.S. (1982).  Training behaviour change agents.  Behaviour Therapy, 13, 1-23.  

Binder, J.L. (1993).  Is it time to improve psychotherapy training?  Clinical Psychology Review, 13, 301-318.  

Page 138: The Shift from "Ordinary" to "Extraordinary" Experience in Psychodynamic Supervision

138

References

Binder, J.L. (2002, August).  What we know about psychotherapy training.  Paper presented at the eighteenth World Congress of Psychotherapy, Trondheim, Norway.

Binder, J.L. (2004).  Key competencies in brief dynamic psychotherapy: Clinical practice beyond the manual.  New York: Guilford.  

Bishop, S.R., Lau, M., Shapiro, S., Carlson, L., Anderson, N.D., Carmody, J., et al. (2004).  Mindfulness: A proposed operational definition.  Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 11, 230-241. 

Bordin, E.S. (1983). A working alliance –based model of supervision.  The Counseling Psychologist, 24, 3-21.

Ekstein, R., & Wallerstein, R.S. (1972). The teaching and learning of psychotherapy. New York: Basic.  

Fauth, J., Gates, S., Vinca, M.A., Boles, S., & Hayes, J.A. (2007).  Big ideas for psychotherapy training.  Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice, Training, 44, 384-391.   

Page 139: The Shift from "Ordinary" to "Extraordinary" Experience in Psychodynamic Supervision

139

References

Frawley-O’Dea, M.G., & Sarnat, J. (2008).  The supervisory relationship: A contemporary psychodynamic approach.  New York, NY: Guilford Press.  

Freidlander, M.L., & Ward, L.G. (1984).  Development and validation of the Supervisors Styles Inventory.  Journal of Counseling Psychology, 31, 541-557.  

Gabbard, G.O.  (2010).    Long-term psychodynamic psychotherapy. A basic text. Washington, D.C. American Psychiatric Publishing, Inc. 

Galante, M. (1998).  Trainees’ and supervisors’ perceptions of effective and ineffective supervisory relationships.  Dissertations Abstracts International: 49: 933B.

Gans, J.S., & Weber, R.L. (2000).  The detection of shame in group psychotherapy:  Uncovering the hidden emotion.  International Journal of Group Psychotherapy, 50, 381-396.  

Page 140: The Shift from "Ordinary" to "Extraordinary" Experience in Psychodynamic Supervision

140

References

Germer, C.K. (2005).  Mindfulness: What is it?  What does it matter?  In C.K. Germer, R.D. Siegel, & P.R. Fulton (Eds.), Mindfulness and psychotherapy (pp. 3-27).  New York: Guilford.  

Gill, S. (Ed.) (2001). The supervisory alliance: Facilitating the psychotherapist’s learning experience.  Northwale, N.J.: Aronson.  

Gitterman, A. (1972).  Comparison of educational models and their influence on supervision.  In F. Kaslow (Ed.), Issues in human services (pp. 18-38).  San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.  

Hedges, L.E. (in press).  Relationship. The essence of psychotherapy and supervision.  International Psychotherapy Institute.  

Heppner, P.P. & Roehlke, H.J. (1984).  Differences among supervisees at different levels of training: Implications for a developmental model of supervision.  Journal of Counseling Psychology, 31, 76-90.

Hoffman, I. Z. (1983).  The patient as interpreter of the analyst’s experience.  Contemporary Psychoanalysis, 19, 389-422. 

Page 141: The Shift from "Ordinary" to "Extraordinary" Experience in Psychodynamic Supervision

141

References

Ladany, N.C. (2004).  Psychotherapy supervision: What lies beneath.  Psychotherapy Research, 14, 1-19. 

Ladany, N.C. (2007).  Does psychotherapy training matter? Maybe not.  Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice, Training, 44, 392-396.

Lizzio, A., Stokes, L., & Wilson, K.  (2005). Approaches to learning in professional supervision: Supervisee perceptions of processes and outcomes.  Studies in Continuing Education, 27, 239-256.  

Lizzio, A., Wilson, K., & Que, J. (2009).  Relationship dimensions in the professional supervision of psychology graduates: supervisee perceptions of process and outcome.  Studies in Continuing Education, 31, 127-140.  

Martin, J.S., Goodyear, R.K., & Newton, F.B. (1987).  Clinical supervision: An intensive case study.  Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 18, 225-235. 

Miller, A. (2008).  The drama of the gifted child: The search for the true self.  New York, NY: Basic Books. 

Milne, D.L., & James, I.A. (2002).  The observed impact of training on competence in clinical supervision.  British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 41, 55-72.  

 

Page 142: The Shift from "Ordinary" to "Extraordinary" Experience in Psychodynamic Supervision

142

References

Nathanson, D.L. (Ed.) (1987).  The many faces of shame.  New York: Guilford Press.

Norcross, J.C. (Ed.) (2002). Psychotherapy relationships that work: Therapist contributions and responsiveness to patient needs.  New York: Oxford University Press.  

Orlinsky, D., Grawe, K., & Parks, B. (1994).  Process and outcome in psychotherapy. In A.E. Bergin & S.L. Garfield (Eds.), Handbook of psychotherapy and behavior change (pp. 270-376). New York: Wiley.

Ramos-Sanchez, L.R., Esnil, E., Goodwin, A., Riggs, S., Touster, L.O., Wright, L.K., Ratanasiripong, P., & Rodolfa, E. (2002).  Negative supervisory events: Effects on supervision satisfaction and supervisory alliance.  Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 33, 197-202.  

Page 143: The Shift from "Ordinary" to "Extraordinary" Experience in Psychodynamic Supervision

143

References

Recihelt, S., & Skjerva, J. (2002). Correspondence between supervisors and trainees in their perceptions of supervision events.  Journal of Clinical Psychology, 58, 759-772.  

Renik, O. (1996).  The perils of neutrality. Psychoanalytic Quarterly, 65, 495-517. 

Renik, O. (1999).  Getting real in analysis.  Journal of Analytical Psychology, 44, 167-187. 

Ronnesttad, M.H., & Skovholy, T.M. (1993).  Supervision of beginning and advanced graduate students of counselling and psychotherapy.  Journal of Counseling and Development, 71, 396-405.  

Russell, R.K., & Petrie, T. (1994).  Issues in training effective supervisors.  Applied and Preventive Psychology, 3, 27-42.

Safran, J.D., & Muran, J.C. (2000).  Negotiating the therapeutic alliance: A relational treatment guide.  New York: Guilford Press. 

Page 144: The Shift from "Ordinary" to "Extraordinary" Experience in Psychodynamic Supervision

144

References

Safran, J.D., & Muran, J.C. (2001).  A relational approach to training and supervision in cognitive psychotherapy.  Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy: An International Quarterly, 15, 3-15.  

Sarnat, J. (2010).  Key competencies of the psychodynamic psychotherapist and how to teach them in supervision.  Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice, Training, 47, 20-27. 

Seidman, E., & Rappaport, J. (1974).  The educational pyramid: A paradigm for training, research, and manpower utilization in community psychology. American Journal of Community Psychology, 2, 119-130.  

Shanfield, S.B., & Gil, D. (1985).  Styles of psychotherapy supervision.  Journal of Psychiatric Education, 9, 225-232. 

Stoltenberg, C.D., & Delworth, U. (1987).  Supervising counselors and therapists.  San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.  

Stoltenberg, C.D., & Delworth, U. (1988). Developmental models of supervision: Is it development—Response to Holloway.  Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 19, 134-137. 

Page 145: The Shift from "Ordinary" to "Extraordinary" Experience in Psychodynamic Supervision

145

References

Tuckett, D. (2005).  Does anything go?  Toward a framework for the more transparent assessment of psychoanalytic competence.  International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 86, 31-49.  

Watkins, Jr., C.E. (1997).  Defining psychotherapy supervision and understanding supervisor functioning. In C.E. Watkins, Jr. (Ed.), Handbook of psychotherapy supervision (pp. 3-10).  New York: Wiley.   

Watkins, Jr., C.E. (2011).  The real relationship in psychotherapy supervision.  American Journal of Psychotherapy, 65, 99-116.  

Winnicott, D.W. (1969). The use of an object.  International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 50, 711-716. 

Winnicott, D.W. (1975).  Through paediatrics to psycho-analysis. New York: Basic Books. 

Worthen, V., & McNeil, B.W. (1996).  A phenomenological investigation of “good” supervision events.  Journal of Counseling Psychology, 43, 25-34.  

Page 146: The Shift from "Ordinary" to "Extraordinary" Experience in Psychodynamic Supervision

146

References

Worthington, E.L. (1987).  Changes in supervision as counselors and supervisors gain experience: A review.  Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 18, 189-208. 

Page 147: The Shift from "Ordinary" to "Extraordinary" Experience in Psychodynamic Supervision

147

Biography: James Tobin, Ph.D., Licensed Psychologist PSY 22074

Dr. Tobin is a licensed psychologist in private practice in Newport Beach, CA, and is Assistant Professor of Clinical Psychology at Argosy University/The American School of Professional Psychology in Orange, CA, where he currently supervises graduate students at the Argosy University Therapeutic Assessment and Psychotherapy Service (AUTAPS). He also participates in an ongoing supervision group at the Newport Psychoanalytic Institute with Lawrence Hedges, Ph.D., the institute’s founder.  

Page 148: The Shift from "Ordinary" to "Extraordinary" Experience in Psychodynamic Supervision

148

Biography: James Tobin, Ph.D., Licensed Psychologist PSY 22074

Dr. Tobin is a former advanced candidate in psychoanalysis at the Psychoanalytic Institute of New England, East and former staff psychologist in the Department of Psychiatry at the Massachusetts General Hospital and Clinical Instructor, Harvard Medical School. Dr. Tobin received an A.B. magna cum laude in Psychology and Social Relations from Harvard University, and a Ph.D. in Clinical Psychology from The Catholic University of America in Washington, D.C.