The Shadow of Dark Matter

39
The Shadow of Dark Matter Kris Sigurdson Institute for Advanced Study Hubble Symposium 2007 Space Telescope Science Institute April 2, 2007

description

The Shadow of Dark Matter. Kris Sigurdson Institute for Advanced Study Hubble Symposium 2007 Space Telescope Science Institute April 2, 2007. Overview. Motivation Dark Matter is ‘Dark’ The Model Constraints An Observable Effect? Particle Physics Setups Conclusions. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of The Shadow of Dark Matter

Page 1: The Shadow of Dark Matter

The Shadow of Dark MatterThe Shadow of Dark Matter

Kris Sigurdson

Institute for Advanced Study

Hubble Symposium 2007

Space Telescope Science Institute

April 2, 2007

Kris Sigurdson

Institute for Advanced Study

Hubble Symposium 2007

Space Telescope Science Institute

April 2, 2007

Page 2: The Shadow of Dark Matter

OverviewOverview

• Motivation

• Dark Matter is ‘Dark’

• The Model

• Constraints

• An Observable Effect?

• Particle Physics Setups

• Conclusions

• Motivation

• Dark Matter is ‘Dark’

• The Model

• Constraints

• An Observable Effect?

• Particle Physics Setups

• Conclusions

Stefano Profumo and KS: Phys. Rev. D75 023521 (2007)astro-ph/0611129

Page 3: The Shadow of Dark Matter

MotivationMotivation

• But… we don’t know much about the physics of dark matter.

• Worth thinking about alternative avenues of discovery.

• But… we don’t know much about the physics of dark matter.

• Worth thinking about alternative avenues of discovery.

Page 4: The Shadow of Dark Matter

Dark Matter

‘Dark’ Matter is Dark Matter ‘Dark’ Matter is Dark Matter

Dark Matter

Not Dark Matter

Dark Matter

Photos: Martin White’s Webpage

Page 5: The Shadow of Dark Matter

‘Dark’ Matter is Dark Matter ‘Dark’ Matter is Dark Matter

Dark Matter

Not Dark Matter

Dark Matter

?

Page 6: The Shadow of Dark Matter

‘Dark’ Matter is Dark Matter ‘Dark’ Matter is Dark Matter

• Very weak coupling to photons

• Strong Limits: Charge (e.g. A. Gould et al. 1990)

Milli-Charge (e.g. S. Davidson et al. 2000; S. Dubovsky et al. 2004)

Magnetic/Electric Dipole (e.g. KS et al. 2004)

• Can NOT appreciably scatter light because the coupling is so very weak

• Very weak coupling to photons

• Strong Limits: Charge (e.g. A. Gould et al. 1990)

Milli-Charge (e.g. S. Davidson et al. 2000; S. Dubovsky et al. 2004)

Magnetic/Electric Dipole (e.g. KS et al. 2004)

• Can NOT appreciably scatter light because the coupling is so very weak

Page 7: The Shadow of Dark Matter

S. Profumo CALTECH

Can Dark Matter Cast a Shadow?

Photon Source Dark Matter Observer

?

Page 8: The Shadow of Dark Matter

The ModelThe Model

• Stable Neutral Dark Matter Particle

• Unstable Neutral Heavier Particle

• Coupled to Photons and each other via a Transition Magnetic/Electric Moment

• Stable Neutral Dark Matter Particle

• Unstable Neutral Heavier Particle

• Coupled to Photons and each other via a Transition Magnetic/Electric Moment

Page 9: The Shadow of Dark Matter

The ModelThe Model

“Atom-like interaction”

Page 10: The Shadow of Dark Matter

The Model: Resonant ScatteringThe Model: Resonant Scattering

Page 11: The Shadow of Dark Matter

Resonant Photon ScatteringResonant Photon Scattering

Relativistic Breit-Wigner Cross Section

CM Energy SquaredCM Momentum

Page 12: The Shadow of Dark Matter

S. Profumo CALTECH

Can Dark Matter Cast a Shadow?

Photon Source Dark Matter Observer

?

Page 13: The Shadow of Dark Matter

The ParametersThe Parameters

m1 (DM particle mass)

m2

M (mass scale of effective dipole moment)

R ≡ m1 /m2

m2

η ≡ m2 / M

Page 14: The Shadow of Dark Matter

Constraints Constraints

• The coupling can allow forproduction of pairs

• Existing astrophysical constraints on Milli-charge(fractional charge) particles (e.g. G. Raffelt 1996)

• Apply, but replace with:

• The coupling can allow forproduction of pairs

• Existing astrophysical constraints on Milli-charge(fractional charge) particles (e.g. G. Raffelt 1996)

• Apply, but replace with:

Page 15: The Shadow of Dark Matter

Lyman-Lyman-

• But…. constraints from the Lyman-forest on warm dark matter impose:

• This supercedes the stellar energy loss limit for the relevant region of the parameter space unless the dark matter is produced in a nonstandard way

• But…. constraints from the Lyman-forest on warm dark matter impose:

• This supercedes the stellar energy loss limit for the relevant region of the parameter space unless the dark matter is produced in a nonstandard way

Page 16: The Shadow of Dark Matter

The ConstraintsThe Constraints

Page 17: The Shadow of Dark Matter

SN1987ASN1987A

• Excess production of pairs in

SN1987A • Excess production of pairs in

SN1987A

SN Core Plasma Frequency

Excludes:

(Too Much Energy Loss) (Particles Trapped)

Page 18: The Shadow of Dark Matter

The ConstraintsThe Constraints

Page 19: The Shadow of Dark Matter

Big Bang NucleosynthesisBig Bang Nucleosynthesis

• If thermalized in the early Universe around

BBN and would contribute to the number of light degrees of freedom present during BBN

• If thermalized in the early Universe around

BBN and would contribute to the number of light degrees of freedom present during BBN

Excludes:

Page 20: The Shadow of Dark Matter

The ConstraintsThe Constraints

Page 21: The Shadow of Dark Matter

“Running” of em“Running” of em

• In the standard model the strength of the electromagnetic interaction becomes stronger at higher energies

• In the standard model the strength of the electromagnetic interaction becomes stronger at higher energies

Modifies the Running of up to the Z-pole

Must Have:

Page 22: The Shadow of Dark Matter

The ConstraintsThe Constraints

Page 23: The Shadow of Dark Matter

AcceleratorsAccelerators

Page 24: The Shadow of Dark Matter

The ConstraintsThe Constraints

Page 25: The Shadow of Dark Matter

S. Profumo CALTECH

Can Dark Matter Cast a Shadow?

Photon Source Dark Matter Observer

?

Page 26: The Shadow of Dark Matter

Velocity BroadeningVelocity Broadening

• Dark matter particles live in a halo with a nonzero virial velocity dispersion

• Dark matter particles live in a halo with a nonzero virial velocity dispersion

Maxwell-Boltzmann:

Page 27: The Shadow of Dark Matter

Broadening in DM HalosBroadening in DM Halos

Coma-like

Broadened

Page 28: The Shadow of Dark Matter

The OpacityThe Opacity

In Detail:

DM Surface Density

The Optical Depth

Page 29: The Shadow of Dark Matter

An Absorption Feature?An Absorption Feature?

The dynamics of the scattering process ~ Compton scattering

forward scattering is unlikely: if a photon scatters, it’s lost (scattering=absorption)

The dynamics of the scattering process ~ Compton scattering

forward scattering is unlikely: if a photon scatters, it’s lost (scattering=absorption)

Absorption occurs if ~ 1

Can be large enough?

Page 30: The Shadow of Dark Matter

An Absorption Feature?An Absorption Feature?

• Consider a cluster like the Coma Cluster:Estimate ~ 5x1029 MeV/cm2 for a LOS through cluster center

• Consider a source behind or at the center of the cluster (e.g. a quasar)

• Consider a cluster like the Coma Cluster:Estimate ~ 5x1029 MeV/cm2 for a LOS through cluster center

• Consider a source behind or at the center of the cluster (e.g. a quasar)

Page 31: The Shadow of Dark Matter

Absorption Feature?Absorption Feature?

LOS through Center

Vary Intrinsic Width

Page 32: The Shadow of Dark Matter

Potentially Interesting Targets?Potentially Interesting Targets?

• Perhaps: Active Galactic Nuclei (e.g. Centaurus A or M87). With a “DM spike”.

• Perhaps: Gamma Ray Bursts? With the right LOS.

• Statistical Detection?

• Perhaps: Active Galactic Nuclei (e.g. Centaurus A or M87). With a “DM spike”.

• Perhaps: Gamma Ray Bursts? With the right LOS.

• Statistical Detection?

Page 33: The Shadow of Dark Matter

Summary: The (,m2) Plane

S. Profumo CALTECH

“Viable”Parameter

SpaceRegion

2res 5 mE ≈

“Coma”referencesurfacedensitygiving ~ 1

Page 34: The Shadow of Dark Matter

SummarySummary

For:

Mass Range:

Resonant Energy:

Page 35: The Shadow of Dark Matter

Other observables: Annihilation?Other observables: Annihilation?

• Through the same interaction Dark Matter particles could annihilate to monochromatic photons

• Through the same interaction Dark Matter particles could annihilate to monochromatic photons

Page 36: The Shadow of Dark Matter

Annihilation: FluxAnnihilation: Flux

Expected Flux:

Diffuse Gamma from COMPTEL/EGRET:

Unfortunately: Difficult to detect such a line from the Galactic center. Perhaps: Dwarf galaxies (e.g. Profumo and Kamionkowski 2006)

*Dedicated line search by INTEGRAL-SPI also not sensitive enough (Teegarden and Watanabe 2006)

Page 37: The Shadow of Dark Matter

Supersymmetric Absorption?Supersymmetric Absorption?

• SUSY: Neutralino Dark Matter

• In principle: could construct such a model in a SUSY setup with lightest neutralino and next-to-lightest neutralino

• SUSY: Neutralino Dark Matter

• In principle: could construct such a model in a SUSY setup with lightest neutralino and next-to-lightest neutralino

Too low number density for a detectable signal

Page 38: The Shadow of Dark Matter

Extended MSM?Extended MSM?

• MSM: DM abundance, neutrino masses, baryon asymmetry, potentially inflation

(T. Asaka et al. 2005; M. Shaposhnikov 2006)

• MeV mass dark-matter

• Extending this with the transition-moment interactino could lead to the phenomenology discussed here

• MSM: DM abundance, neutrino masses, baryon asymmetry, potentially inflation

(T. Asaka et al. 2005; M. Shaposhnikov 2006)

• MeV mass dark-matter

• Extending this with the transition-moment interactino could lead to the phenomenology discussed here

Page 39: The Shadow of Dark Matter

The EndThe End

• Dark Matter is ‘Dark’ Matter… but for special energies resonant scattering is possible

• a priori: This could lead to absorption features due to dark matter halos.

• A range of the parameter space remains.

• Perhaps: AGN, GRBs, ????

• Not SUSY. Perhaps MSM-like model.

• Dark Matter is ‘Dark’ Matter… but for special energies resonant scattering is possible

• a priori: This could lead to absorption features due to dark matter halos.

• A range of the parameter space remains.

• Perhaps: AGN, GRBs, ????

• Not SUSY. Perhaps MSM-like model.

Stefano Profumo and KS: Phys. Rev. D75 023521 (2007)astro-ph/0611129