The semiclassical Rabi problem
description
Transcript of The semiclassical Rabi problem
The semiclassical Rabi problem
We have a two level atom,with We look for the solution of the Schrödinger equation as:The atom has a hamiltonian: The field interaction has a corresponding hamilton operator: Our goal is to look for the solution of a two level atom in a classical electric
field, described, by, If we are talking about a two level atom,the solution without the field, we can describe by the time dependent Schrödinger equation, If we assume that
Now we can apply the time independent schrödinger equation,and we get:
Since we have a two level atom, the general solution of the differential equation is
seigenstateandlsenergyleveWW 2121 ,, 21),( 21 cctr
atomH^
iH^
iatom HHH^^^
dt
trdjtrH atom
),(),(
^
2
1),(
2
1
c
ctr
iWiH iatom ^
constant a is last the,)(c ,)(
)( i i
Wj
ii
ii cwhereectdt
tdcjtcW
i
21),(21
21jWjW
ecectr
This is the two level atom. When there is no radiation thereis no transition between states, thus the interaction betweenfield and atom is none. That is why we need to introduce operators. To describe the interactions only when transitions occurWe have a classical electromagnetic field:The interaction is only when the electron changes it’s energy level.This is when from state 1 goes to state 2 and
from state 2 goes to state 1.Two transitions can be described with two operators:
)()(__
0
__
tCosEtE
Transition from state 1 to state 2 of the electron.d is the dipole moment vector.
21
121. operator:2. operator:
The dipole momentum is equal in length: derdd
__
12
__
21
__
Basically the dipole momentum vector is a 3 dimensional vector, where each of it’s component contains the momentum in the given direction and the classicall electricfield contains the electric field strength measured in V/m, divided also in 3 components.
)1221)(()(__
0
____^^
tCosEdtEdH i
)2112(^
dd Here the two operators decidesweather is emitted or absorbed radiation. er
__
12
__
r
e
The operator-matrix of an operator can be written as:
The operator matrix of the atom: can be seen:
This is true because of the time independent
Schrödinger equation:
The operator matrix of the field hamiltonian:
This is true because the property of the interactionHamiltonian.
(There is no dipole with 1 state, we wolud need Infinite energy)
2
^
^^
1
^
W22
01221
W11
atom
atomatom
atom
H
HH
H
)(12
)(21
02211
0
____^
0
____^
^^
tCosEdH
tCosEdH
HH
i
i
ii
iWiH i
^
2212
1111
^^
^
1
^
^
HH
HHH
)2211( 21
^
WWH atom
Now we put the atom in an electric field. What happens to ?The state functions remain constant, but the time dependence will change, we can describe this time dependence, by saying that the coefficients are time dependent functions:
Now let us write the new equation:Our hamiltonian of the whole system is: This is the total energy.
We apply this on our partial solution,
but first we write the upper equation in another form,
Afterwards we wrote
our hamiltonian matrix:
Thus…
),( tr
)()( 2211 tccandtcc
21
2)(1)(),( 21
jWjW
etcetctr
iatom HHH
^^^
)()(
),(^
rdt
tdjtrH
2
1
)(
)(),(
2
1
2
1
tjW
tjW
etc
etctr
0)(
)(0,
0
0
0
__
12
__
0
__
12
__^
2
1^
tCosEd
tCosEdHand
W
WH iatom
2
__
012
__
__
012
__
1^
)(
)(
WtCosEd
tCosEdWH
What about the derivative of the equation, we derivate the matrix form and we
get:
By substituting all this information in the time dependent Schrödinger equation,
we get a space invariant set of equations, which will lead us to the Rabi
solution:
The last two terms are left aside, and by multiplying them back we get two equations:
Where:
2
1
)()(
)()(),(
22
11
222
111
tjW
tjW
tjW
tjW
etcWj
etc
etcWj
etctr
2
1
)()(
)()(
2
1
)(
)(
)(
)(22
11
2
1
222
111
2
1
2
__
012
__
__
012
__
1
tjW
tjW
tjW
tjW
tjW
tjW
etcWj
etc
etcWj
etcj
etc
etc
WtCosEd
tCosEdW
tj
tj
etctCosEdj
tc
etctCosEdj
tc
0
0
)()()(
)()()(
10
__
12
__
2
20
__
12
__
1
12
0
WW
The Rabi frequency is defined as:
We know that:
The new equations are of the form:
12
__
0
__^_
0
_
21dE
dE
Rabi
2)()(
2)()(
)()(
12
)()(
21
00
00
tjtj
Rabi
tjtj
Rabi
eetjctc
eetjctc
tjtj eetCos
)(
The Rabi frequency is an interaction frequency betweenfield and atom. It is a mean frequency.
Hz
Wsm
VE
Asmd
Rabi
)dim(
)dim(
)dim(
)dim(
2
__
0
__
12
If we neglect the fast oscillations, which are near 2ω , beacause of the near resonance effect, then we apply the rotating wave approximation (RWA). We can do this because the slow oscillations govern the time evolution (the fast oscillations change very fast the sign of the term)
The new system is :
If we are at perfect resonance (ω0=ω), then te equations are:
The solution is:
Because we defined the probability of finding the system in a state is,
that is why
)2
(22
20)
2(22
10
2
1tRabiSinctRabiCoscc
2)()(
2)()(
)(
12
)(
21
0
0
tj
Rabi
tj
Rabi
etjctc
etjctc
dV*
2 statein electron thefinding ofy probabilit thec
1 statein electron thefinding ofy probabilit thec2
2
2
1
2
1)()(
2
1)()(
12
21
Rabi
Rabi
tjctc
tjctc
conditions initial theare ,2
20
2
10 cc
002
2
0
1
0
0{.}
2
1
2
1
2
1
2
12
1
2
1
2
1
2
1
2
1
2
1
2
2
2
2,
2
2
0
2
20
),(0
2
20
)(
C
jsjsjsjs
jsjsjsjsCC
ssj
jsC
Csj
jsCCC
sj
js
Cj
jCsCtc
j
jtc
RabiRabiRabiRabi
RabiRabiRabiRabi
RabiRabi
Rabi
Rabi
Rabi
Rabi
Rabi
Rabi
Rabi
Laplace
Rabi
Rabi
2
1
2
1
22
1
4
1
2
1
2
1
2
1
4
2
2
2
2
RabiRabiRabiRabi
RabiRabiRabi
jsjsjs
jsjss
s
The solution of the Rabi problem
,2
1)( 0
__
2222
2222__
ceeee
eeeetc tjtjtj
tj
tjtj
tj
tj
RabiRabiRabiRabi
RabiRabiRabiRabi
Applying inverse Laplace transform:
Where we assumed that at t=0 we are in state 1 with probability 1. thus |c10|=1, and |c20|=0.
,)
2()
2(
)2
()2
(
)(
)()(
2010
2010
2
1__
tCosctjSinc
tjSinctCosc
tc
tctc
RabiRabi
RabiRabi
)2
()2
()(
)2
()2
()(
20*
10*
1*
20101
tjSinctCosctc
tjSinctCosctc
RabiRabi
RabiRabi
)2
(22
20)
2(22
10
2
1 tRabiSinctRabiCoscc
If we assume that in time instant 0 we are in state 1 and we are in perfect resonance, then the probabilities are:
In this case the solutions for the probabilities are:
We can see on this picture, that the probabilitiesare inverted in phase, and, they are preserved.If we are at time instant , then
the system is in state 1 with ~ 0.7 and instate 2 with ~ 0.3 probability.
The final conclusion is that the probability change between is:In this diagram at the peak values we are instate 2 with 1 probability, and at min values we are in state 1 with 1 probability.
0c and 1c2
2
2
1
22
2
2
2
22
1
2
1
)2
((t)c0(0)c
)2
(C(t)c1(0)c
tSin
tos
Rabi
Rabi
21 Rabi
2
2
2
1
2
2
2
1 c -1c:property theof because ,c and c
1 2 3 4 5 6
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
Density Matrices
22
__________________________
)(2
)()(
)(2
)()(
122111
1
**
*
21
21
1
tj
Rabi
tj
Rabi
tj
Rabi
tj
Rabi
ej
ej
tce
tjctc
tce
tjctc
)(2
______________________
)(2
)()(
)(2
)()(
112221
2
*2
*1
*
112
tjRabi
tj
Rabi
tj
Rabi
ej
tce
tjctc
tce
tjctc
These are the elementsof the thensity matrix:
*
22
*
12
*
21
*
11
2221
1211
cccc
cccc
22112211 1
*
2112*
2112
mesaure detuning ,, 0 theiswhere
We can fulfill these constraints even if we introduce other variables , to solve
the equation with Laplace Transformation: ~*211212
~
2222
~
1111
~
,
tje
Derivating these:
~*
21121212
~
2222
~
1111
~
,
tjtj eje
Substituting the derivatives intothe original equations:
)(2
22
11
~
22
~
21
~
21
~
12
~
21
~
11
~
Rabi
RabiRabi
jj
jj
We can write now the system of equations:
22
~21
~12
~11
~
22
~
21
~
12
~
11
~
022
0
20
2
20
2
022
0
RabiRabi
RabiRabi
RabiRabi
RabiRabi
jj
jjj
jjj
jj
This is a standard equation of a system with 4 inputs, 4 outputs, and we assume thatthe system’s initial state is state 1.
Initial condition
In[2]:= PowerExpandFullSimplifyInverseLaplaceTransformInverse
s 2 2 0 2 s 0 2 2 0 s 2
0 2 2 s
.1000
, s, t
Out[2]=2 2 2 2 Cosht2 222 2 , Sinh1
2t2 22 2Cosh1
2t2 2
2 2 Sinh1
2t2 22 232 ,
Sinh12t2 22 2Cosh1
2t2 2
2 2 Sinh1
2t2 22 232 , 2Sinh1
2t2 22
2 2
12 232 Sinh12 t2 22 2Cosh1
2t2 2
2 2 Sinh1
2t2 2
))()((2
1
2
)()())(1(
]2
[]2
[]2
[)](2
[
22222222
322
22222222
322
2222
22
322
2222
22
RabiRabiRabiRabi
Rabi
Rabi
RabiRabiRabiRabiRabiRabi
Rabi
RabiRabi
RabiRabi
Rabi
RabiRabi
RabiRabi
tSinjtCos
tSinjtCos
jtSinh
jtSinh
jtCosh
jtSinh
Solutions:
)2
(
)2
(1
22
2
22
2
22
22
2
22
2
11
Rabi
Rabi
Rabi
Rabi
Rabi
Rabi
tSin
tSin
*
21
222222
2212 ))()((2
1
RabiRabiRabi
Rabi
Rabitj tSinjtCose
1 2 3 4 5 6
-0.4
-0.2
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
In case of perfect resonance again we know much more:
)2
(
)2
(1
))(2
1
2
22
2
11
*
2112
Rabi
Rabi
Rabi
tSin
tSin
tSinj
1)( 2 Wp
1)( 1 Wp
)1(
)2(
1. We start by the given initial condition,that we are in state 1. then the weight for transitionis 0, because we know for shure that we are in state 1. (1)2. When the electron is halfway on it’s road between states(.5 probability), then the absor-bed energy weight is maximum.(2)3. If we are in state 2 with 1 probability, then it’s the same story as in 2. (3)4. If we are again halfway between states but we go from 2 to 1, then the emmitted energy amount reaches it’s maximum.5. The period closes
!! Remark: This is the perfect resonance case.
22
12
)3(
)4(
)5(
2 and 1 statebetween ns transitioof weight theρ12
Solutions:
)2
/1(
/1
1
)2
/1(
/1
11
22
2
2222
22
2
2211
RabiRabi
Rabi
RabiRabi
Rabi
tSin
tSin
1Rabi
1 2 3 4 5 6
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
4
2
1
5.0
0
Conclusion:
The larger the detuning is the the larger the probability of remaining in state 1.
We took the Rabi frequency as 1.
2
)(1)
2(
2
)(1)
2(1
))(2
1
2
22
2
11
*
2112
RabiRabi
RabiRabi
Rabi
tCostSin
tCostSin
tSinj
Rabit
2Rabit
After this new form,we can see, that ifwe irradiate, by a pulse of lengththen we put the electron in state 2. if we Irradiate by then we get back in state 1.
2212
~
21
~
22
~
11
~
22
~
21
~
21
~
11
~
22
~
12
~
12
~
2212
~
21
~
11
~
22
)(2
)2
(
)(2
)2
(
22
Ajj
jjA
jjA
Ajj
RabiRabi
Rabi
Rabi
RabiRabi
Relaxation: Dapming is because of thespontaneous emission of Photons. Thus the probability of being in state 1 increases after a given amount of time, and that of being in state 2 decreases. Furthermore the electron’s probability reaches a steady state. (It’s value is constant after a time.)
We introduce two coefficients.A passes the probability fromstate 2 to 1. (spont. emmission) is the coherent interaction – ץ
The reasons of decay (A): Thermal reservoir, electronic discharges (noise), andeverything that affects the whole system – this is the spontaneous emmission coefficient.The reasons of decay (ץ): This represens the the interactions between the coherent states (|1><2|, and |2><1|) due to the interaction between electrons.
~*211212
~
2222
~
1111
~
,
tje
We must not forget, that:
… and do our calculations accordingly.
In[40]:= A 0.1; 10000; 1; 100; o 2000;
G FullSimplifyInverseLaplaceTransformInverse
s 2 2 A 2 s A
2 0 2
2 0 s A2 2
0 2 2 s A
.1000
, s, t;
F TransposeG.1, 0, 0, 0;PlotAbsEvaluateF,t, 0, o;F TransposeG.0, 0, 0, 1;PlotAbsEvaluateF,t, 0, o;
100 200 300 400 500 600
0.999501
0.999501
0.999502
0.999503
0.999503
100 200 300 400 500 600 700
0.0004988
0.0004992
0.0004994
<-the probability of finding the electron in state 1.
<-the probability of finding the electron in state 2.
In this figure we cansee, that after the steady state of theρ11 and ρ22 probabilitiesThe coherence of the is constant too.
These facts have theoretical background too.
Let’s assume, that:
rapidly. decreasing are , ., of change
thegoverns- A smallvery 22
1.
21122211
22
jA
Rabi
ts.coefficienin small very are (4) and(1), eqin termsthe
ofboth because constant,almost are ,2
2. 2211 jA
A
2212
~
21
~
22
~
11
~
22
~
21
~
21
~
11
~
22
~
12
~
12
~
2212
~
21
~
11
~
22)4(
)(2
)2
()3(
)(2
)2
()2(
22)1(
Ajj
jjA
jjA
Ajj
RabiRabi
Rabi
Rabi
RabiRabi
: Thus 0. are , state
steady after andrapidly decreasing are
and slowly. changing arethey
becauseconstant almost are ,,
1221
2112
2211
)()
21
(2
)()
21
(2
112212
112221
jAj
jAj
Rabi
Rabi
The quantized electromagnetic field
We know from quantummechanics the Hamilton equations:
We also know the global definition for impulse:
i
i
ii
ii
q
Lp
p
Hq
q
Hp
,
potkindensityL The Lagrange density function can be definedas the difference between the kinetic and pot-ential energy density functions.In case of electromagnetic fields, we define the Hamilton density function as:
From classical electromagnetic
field theory (where A is the vector potential):
)(2
1 22 HEH density
gradt
AE
)(Arot
H
AwhereEgradt
Ap
Arotgrad
t
AL
defdef
i
density
i
22
q , E )(
]))(
()([2
1
density impulse theis where,2
)(
2
22
Arot
H density
If we want to write the electromagnetic field in a unitary cube, we should introducetwo orthogonal vector functions and the wave vector, which make an orhogonalsystem.
We introduce two orthogonal unit vectors: iji kvectorwavetheandee ,, 21
The sinusoidal and the orthonormal property:
)1(,1
33
*22
*112/3
dVuudVuueeL
uL
ii
L
iirjk
ilili
)()(
)()(
rutqbA
rutpa
ii
i
ii
i
Ajkrot(A)
)(
i212/3
12/311
iirjk
ii
i
rjk
i
ujkeekL
j
eL
euurot
i
i
1
,a ;)(2
)(2
22222
22
3
btq
bktp
adVHH
ii
ii
L
density
iiii
ii
ii tqtptq
ktpH )()(
2
1)()(
2
1 22222
2
This is becausep,and q functionswere arbitrary chosenso the coeff. can be arbitrary chosen too.
We introduce the space and impulse operaors: klj
rj
l
l
p
p
, :equationr Schrodinge
esatisfy thmust operators twoThese . and
k
k
q
q
ii
iii
i jj
2
1
2
1
ii
iiii
aaH
qpqpH
From here the emission and absorption operators are:
i
i
i
i jj
2,
2ii
iii
i
pqa
pqa
i
rjkrjkii
i
rjkrjkii
rjkiii
rjkii
ii
iiii
ii
eeV
jeEeeV
je
eeV
jjeeV
jj
)(2
)(2
1)2(
1)2(
2
1
2
*
iiii
iiii
aaaa
qaqa
Gaussian pulses
In practice one frequency of an electric field cannot be radiated, it is always a
gaussian pulse, which in case it is narrow enough it approximates very good
the discrete frequency. Instead of scatterings we want to use the full width half
maximum ( ) length, because we can measure it. It is at the half of a
gaussian function. (which is the monochromatic light spectrum)
We want the Gaussian function to be:
FWHMt
5.0
FWHMt
2ln8
t
2ln8t ;2ln22t
2t because ,2ln2
2FWHM2
22FWHMFWHM
FWHM
HWHMtx
22
2
2
1 x
e
2ln22ln2
1
Our gaussian function is applied in the power spec-trum description of light:
2
max
2ln420
FWHMt
)t(t
ePP(t)
FWHM
p
t
EP
22ln22
maxThe peak value, atTime instant t0 :
Where Ep is the pulse energyWe get Ep by integrating P(t).
This pulse width is Gaussian, because, when the pulse begins, it’s power is minimal, and increases exponentially. At peak value the device that makes the pulse is shut down, thus the pulse’s power decayes exponentially in time.
In general if we don’t know the shape of the pulse we can transform it in a Gaussian, by calculating the sqare scatterig and transforming it into the fwhm and expected value in time:
length: and by calculating the expected
value. Here the beam spectrum has it’s peak value at:
dttP
dttPttt pulse
)(
)()(2ln8
2
02
dttP
dtttPt
)(
)(0
These integrals aredone on the wholepulse length.
The caracteristics of Gaussian beams:
A laser beam, can be caracterized by it’s wave vector, which tells us in
which direction the wave goes to at the given coordinate. Because it’s
intensity usually in one direction is higher, that is why we assume that it’s
intensity in the x, y direction is decaying exponentially.
We „cut” the beam in mind and realise that in the core the intensity is higher:
So let’s assume at z=0 and t = 0 the
electric field is in the form of:
Where w0 is the beam radius. (the time is separable). The intensity is
The beam’s electric field goes in three directions, so
We can expand it. This way the wavenumber is
preserved in the length of wave vectors.
Where:
20
22
0)0,,( w
yx
eEyxE
222202
2
kqpkc
k
q
p
k0
kzqypxrk ee 0This way:
2E
dpdqeyxEqpE jqyjpxA
)0,,(4
1),( 2
The electric field is built up from different amplitudes corresponding to different
wave vectors, by the Fourier Integral:
The amplitude depends only from p and q, because going in the z direction the amplitude is approximatly always the same. (the waves going in x direction have high p, because the weight of the x direction is p)
By inverse Fourier integral of E(x,y,0), we get that at a given wavevector of x
and y what is the electirc field amplitude.
If we assume that the wavenumbers in the z direction are the highest then we
can say that in the equation,
this way we can get k.
)(4
200
20
2220
20
2
20
2
44),(
qpw
w
yjqy
w
xjpx
A ewE
dyedxeE
qpE
2200 ))(( qpkkkk 00 2)( kkk
dpdqeqpEzyxE jkzjqyjpxA
),(),,(
0
22
0 2k
qpkk
Now we deal with the Fourier integral, by substituting k. So the the derived
equation.
dqeeedpeeeewE
dpdqeeewE
zyxE
zk
q
jqyqwz
kp
jpypw
zkj
zkqp
zkjjqyjpxqp
w
0
2
220
0
2
220
0
0
22
02220
2424200
2)(4
200
4
4),,(
)(2
1
/
200
0 020
20
2
21
),,,( tzkjkw
jzwr
ee
wk
jzE
tzyxE
In[23]:=w2
4 Integrate14 p2 w2 p
2z2 k
px,p, , , AssumptionsRew2 2Imz
k
Integrate14 q2 w2q2 z2 k
q y,q, , , Assumptions Rew2 2Imz
k
Out[23]= k x2
k w22z k y2
k w22z w2
w2 2zk
<- The result
Finallywe get:
20
200
0 12
12
nw
jz
wk
jzk
First we assumed, that the beam radius was w0, but we know that the elec-tric field is Re{E(x,y,z,t)}
This way the beam radius as a function of z is in the exponent :
2
20
10)(
wn
zwzw
2
0wnzR This is the Rayleigh length
which is also called the focus depth of a beam.
)(zw
z0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
•The diameter is increasing linearly in functionof z, at large distances.
length Rayleigh the is z and
widthbeam minimum w where,)(
)tan( ,
R
00lim theis
z
w
z
zwsmallFor
Rz
0w
We usually say that the radius of a gaussian beam is where the intensity
reaches it’s 1/e^2 value.
We know that:
2
20
20
22
1
2
2
20
00
1
)2(),,(
n
zw
yx
e
n
z
zkCosEyxzE Is the electric field
of the beam
2
20
20
1
4'
2
20
00
1
)2(),',(
n
zw
r
e
n
z
zkCosErzE
It was easy to rewrite it in polar coordinates:
thuszktCoswE
zkCose
wEdrdrzErdrdrzErzw
),2()8646.0(2
)2(1
12
'),',(''),',('
020
20
0220
20
)(
2
0
2
0
2
0
2
86.5% of power is inside the beam radius.