The Securitization of Migration in Austria Paul Ploberger Tihany, 09.05.2015.
-
Upload
roxanne-thompson -
Category
Documents
-
view
212 -
download
0
Transcript of The Securitization of Migration in Austria Paul Ploberger Tihany, 09.05.2015.
The Securitization of Migration in AustriaPaul Ploberger
Tihany, 09.05.2015
Overview
What happened?
What is „security“?
What is „securitization“?
What is wrong with „securitization“?
What does that mean for migration?
What to take away from this talk
What happened?
Recruitment of „guest workers“ throughout the 1960ies
Seen as necessary for economic growth
Migration as part of labor market politics
What happened?
What happened?
Oil crisis in 1974
Organized crime as new topic
90ies: threat to
Austrian identity
Welfare system
Economic development
Shift in migration patterns (S-N -> E-W)
Rise of Austrian Freedom Party
What happened?
Jörg Haider († 2008)
Rightwing populist party
In government from 2000 to
2006
What happened?
Shift in institutional setting
Fremdenkriminalität („crime committed by foreigners“)
Connection: migrants – security of Austrian population
Expansion of „security“ limitation of migration and asylum
What is „security“?
(Military) survival of nation-state
Broadening of concept after Cold War
„Enemies“ „threats“ and „risks“
Nation-state individuals
„Widening and deepening“ of security
What is „security“?
Security is
Not clear-cut but ambiguous and contested
Not a material good but a social construct
There is no security issue per se
An issue has to be made a security issue
What is „securitization“?
Non-politicized politicized securitize
d
What is „securitization“?
Discoursive concept
Security located in language
Securitization is a Speech Act with a certain modality and logic:
Existential threat
Substantial consequences
Need to react right away
What’s wrong with “securitization”?
Indicates threat and immediate reaction
One solution as adequate
Limits dialog and opportunities for other solutions
Potentially undemocratic
Might undermine rights and liberties
Transparency and accountability?
What does this mean for migration?
Migrants/migration as possible threat legitimizes drastic measures
Limits to possibilities of migration
worsening of situation of migrants
„regular“ migration versus „irregular“ migration
What to take away from this talk
Security is highly ambiguous and controversial
A security issue has to be made
Question security issues!
Thank you!