The Science of Climate Change

45
The Science of Climate Change Dr. Douglas Allen Dept. of Physics and Astronomy Dordt College, Sioux Center, Iowa April 19, 2007 Why is the Debate so Confusing? Scientific Reasons Philosophical Reasons Climate Change Science Indicators Attribution Projections Consequences Summary

description

The Science of Climate Change. Dr. Douglas Allen Dept. of Physics and Astronomy Dordt College, Sioux Center, Iowa April 19, 2007. Why is the Debate so Confusing? Scientific Reasons Philosophical Reasons Climate Change Science Indicators Attribution Projections - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of The Science of Climate Change

Page 1: The Science of Climate Change

The Science of Climate Change

Dr. Douglas Allen Dept. of Physics and Astronomy

Dordt College, Sioux Center, Iowa

April 19, 2007

Why is the Debate so Confusing? Scientific Reasons Philosophical Reasons

Climate Change Science Indicators Attribution Projections Consequences

Summary

Page 2: The Science of Climate Change

Climate vs. WeatherClimate and weather are both described in terms of

physical properties of the atmosphere (temperature, wind, pressure, humidity, precipitation, etc.)

Weather: refers to what is happening at any given time (example: today’s high temperature is …)

Climate: refers to average weather over time and/or geographic area. (example: the average temperature in Iowa in 2005 was …)

“Climate change”: refers to a change in the average weather over a certain geographic area.

“Global climate change”: refers to the change in the average climate over the whole Earth.

Page 3: The Science of Climate Change

Why is the Climate Change Debate so Confusing? Scientific Reasons

Climate changes occur on long time-scales need long data records to discern trends

Climate change trends are smaller than normal weather fluctuations need good statistics

The atmosphere-ocean system is very complicated need computer models

Projections depend on uncertain human actions need to develop plausible scenarios

No one can be an expert on all areas of the debate need to decide who you will trust

Page 4: The Science of Climate Change

Why is the Climate Change Debate so Confusing? Philosophical Reasons

Worldviews influence how we filter scientific “data”.“Virtually all the major disagreements between rival theories in the sciences and in philosophy can be ultimately traced to the differences between the religious beliefs that guide them.” (R. Clouser, The Myth of Religious Neutrality).

(Unwritten) rules of policy argument tend to be more lenient than rules of scientific argument.

In policy argument, scientific “facts” may be poorly presented in order to support a particular position.

Policy debate demands fast answers and can be unsympathetic to scientific caution.

For further discussion see “The Science and Politics of Global Climate Change: A Guide to the Debate,” by A. Dessler and E. Parson, 2006.

Page 5: The Science of Climate Change

The Responsibility of the Scientist in the Climate Change Debate

Provide accurate information about the likely magnitude, causes, and projections of global climate change.

Be up front about all assumptions made.

Provide levels of uncertainty and statistical significance.

Use the peer-review process (an effective filter).

Provide results that are reproducible and refutable.

Provide quantitative results, not anecdotal evidence.

Reference claims to peer-reviewed publications.

Page 6: The Science of Climate Change

Climate Change Research• Information sources

– Observations of Climate Variables• Direct: weather stations, ships, planes, buoys, satellites• Indirect: tree rings, ice cores, corals, ocean sediments,

boreholes, glacier records, etc.

– Models that Simulate Past and Future Climate• Global circulation models (GCMs)• Regional climate models (RCMs)• Coupled Atmosphere Ocean GCMs (AOGCMs)

• Dissemination of information– Peer-reviewed journal articles– Scientific Assessments

• Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC)• Reports published in 1990, 1995, 2001, 2007

Page 7: The Science of Climate Change

Data from tree rings, ice cores, and other proxies

See Mann et al., Geophys. Res. Lett., 26 (6), 759-762, 1999.

Warming is larger over land

Warming is larger during winter

Warming is larger at high latitudes

Is the Global Surface Temperature Rising?

N. Hemisphere Temperature (1000-2000)

The “Hockey Stick” Diagram

Increase of 0.74oC or 1.3oF from 1906-2005Global Average Temperature Deviation (1850-2005)

IPCC 2007 Figure SPM-3 Data from thermometers

Page 8: The Science of Climate Change

Other Indicators of 20th Century Warming

• 17 centimeter (±5) sea level rise • Decline in NH snow cover • Retreat of mountain glaciers • Global ocean heat content increase

since the late 1950’s (when we started collecting good data)

• 10 -15% drop in Arctic spring and summer sea-ice extent

• Warming of lower- and middle troposphere

• Average atmospheric water vapor content increase

From Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis, IPCC.

See IPCC Climate Change 2001: Working Group I Technical Summary

Page 9: The Science of Climate Change

Potential Causes of 20th Century Warming

• Earth’s orbital variations Large timescales

• Tectonic activity Large timescales

• Volcanoes Irregular, short-lived impact

• Internal variability Magnitude of internal variability too small to account for observed global-scale changes

• Solar variability Solar variations play a role in climate, but sun’s output has been relatively steady over last 25 years

• Human activities Enhanced greenhouse effect Enhanced aerosols

See “The Science and Politics of Global Climate Change: A

Guide to the Debate,” by A. Dessler and E. Parson, 2006.

Page 10: The Science of Climate Change

Total Solar Irradiance (1600-2000)

Maunder Minimum

~0.25% increase (~3 W/m2)

Little Ice AgeData from Lean (2000)

Data from Solanki and Krivova (2003)

Page 11: The Science of Climate Change

Solar Variability

Page 12: The Science of Climate Change

Solar Variations

• The Sun has a

0.62 W/m2 increase (1980-2005)

0.54 W/m2 increase (1980-2005)

0.06 W/m2 decrease (1980-2005)

0.10 W/m2 increase (1980-2005)

Page 13: The Science of Climate Change

Potential Causes of 20th Century Warming

• Earth’s orbital variations Large timescales

• Tectonic activity Large timescales

• Volcanoes Irregular, short-lived impact

• Internal variability Magnitude of internal variability too small to account for observed global-scale changes

• Solar variability Solar variations play a role in climate, but sun’s output has been relatively steady over last 25 years

• Human activities Enhanced greenhouse effect Enhanced aerosols

See “The Science and Politics of Global Climate Change: A

Guide to the Debate,” by A. Dessler and E. Parson, 2006.

Page 14: The Science of Climate Change

The Greenhouse Effect

Visible/UV Visible/

UV

Visible/

UV

Infr

ared

Infra

red

Average temperature without greenhouse gasses = -6°C (21°F) Average temperature with greenhouse gasses = +15°C (59°F)

Page 15: The Science of Climate Change

Characteristics of Greenhouse GasesGas Natural Sources Anthropogenic Sources Average Atmospheric

Residence Time

CO2 - Carbon

Dioxide

Respiration, plant decomposition

Fossil fuel burning, biomass burning (clearing forests)

About 125 yrs.(multiple time scales)

CH4 - Methane Ruminant animals, wetlands

Rice paddies, biomass burning, landfills, natural gas exploitation

12 yrs.

N2O - Nitrous Oxide Natural soil processes

Fertilizer app., fossil fuel burning

120 yrs.

CFC’s – Chloroflouro-carbons

None Aerosol prop., refrigerants, foam packing

65-130 yrs.

Trace gases - tropospheric O3, CF4,

and others

Internal comb. engines, aluminum production, other

50,000 yrs. for CF4

Note: Water vapor is the dominant greenhouse gas, but water vapor respond quickly to the atmospheric temperature and so is treated as a

part of the climate system that responds to external forcing.

Page 16: The Science of Climate Change

CO2 has risen by 35 %

Trends of Greenhouse Gas Concentrations

N2O has risen by 18 %

CH4 has risen by 148 %

280 parts per million

379 parts per million in 2005

Page 17: The Science of Climate Change

Correlation vs. Attribution

Carbon dioxide increase appears to correlate well with recent increase in temperature.

But a correlation alone doesn’t necessarily indicate cause and effect. [Examples]

In order to attribute causal relationship scientists construct models to test the relative effects of various physical processes.

Page 18: The Science of Climate Change

Attribution of Climate Change Using Models

• To establish cause-effect relationship, need to use computer models that simulate the known “laws” of physics, chemistry, etc.

• Climate models are similar to weather models, but focus on large-scale, long-term changes rather than short forecasts.

• Models attempt to reconstruct past climate as well as project future climate.

Page 19: The Science of Climate Change

The global mean radiative forcing of the climate system for 2005 relative to 1750

IPCC 4th Assessment Report Figure SPM-2

Page 20: The Science of Climate Change

Simple Climate Model Results

Temperature without GG = -6°C (21°F)

Temperature with GG = +15°C (59°F)

Doubling carbon dioxide (all else constant) should result in an increase of 1.2°C. With feedbacks (water vapor, ice-albedo, clouds), expected increase of 2 to 4.5°C

Sun

Solar Energy IR EnergyAbsorbed by Earth = Emitted by Earth Earth

(1 – A) E = σ T4

E = 343 W/m2 (Average Solar Flux at Earth)A = 0.16 (Earth’s Albedo, without clouds)T = 267° K = -6° C (Earth’s average temperature)

Earth

See “Global Warming: The Complete Briefing” by John Houghton

Page 21: The Science of Climate Change

See Stott et al., Science, 290, 15 Dec. 2000, 2133-2137, 2000.

Model

Observations

Including Solar + Volcanic Activity

Including Greenhouse Gas increases

Including All Factors

GCM reconstructions of global average temperature (1860-2000)

Solar

Sulfate Aerosols

GG

Page 22: The Science of Climate Change

Model Projections of Global Average Temperature

See Stott et al., Science, 290, 15 Dec. 2000, 2133-2137, 2000.

Projection based on IPCC B2 Scenario

Page 23: The Science of Climate Change

Multiple Model Projections

Experiments with 1% per year increase in carbon dioxide. Doubling of carbon dioxide would occur in year 70.

All 20 models show increased warming, and most models show increased precipitation.

From Climate Change 2001: The Scientific Basis, IPCC.

Global Average Temperature Global Average Precipitation

Average temperature increase of 1.8 C over 70 years.

Models generally predict increased precipitation

Page 24: The Science of Climate Change

Projected temperature and sea levels based on various carbon emission scenarios

From Climate Change 2001: The Scientific Basis, IPCC.

Increase from 1.7 to 4.2°C (3 to 7.5°F) Increase from

10 to 90 cm

Global Average Temperature Global Average Sea Level

Projections from 4th Assessment Report (graphs not yet available):

Temperature increase of 1.1 – 6.4°C, Sea Level Rise of 18-59 cm

Page 25: The Science of Climate Change

Likely Global Warming Consequences

Increasing GG Concentrations? Virtually certain

Rising Temperatures? Virtually certain

Melting ice? Virtually certain

Rising Sea Levels? Very likely

Eroding coastlines? Very likely

J. Knox, Living in a Globally Warmed World, Phi Kappa Phi Forum, Vol. 86, 11-16.

Page 26: The Science of Climate Change

Possible Global Warming Consequences

Strengthening Hurricanes? The jury is out

Intensifying heat waves? Possible

Worsening droughts and floods? Possible

Invading tropical diseases? Possible

Proliferating tornadoes? Unlikely

J. Knox, Living in a Globally Warmed World, Phi Kappa Phi Forum, Vol. 86, 11-16.

Page 27: The Science of Climate Change

Summary

Climate is influenced by many complex factors, some of which we understand well while others are poorly understood.

Observational evidence supports global average surface warming of ~0.74°C, sea level rise of ~17 cm over the last century, and widespread melting of snow and ice.

Most of the observed increase in globally averaged temperatures since the mid-20th century is very likely due to the observed increase in anthropogenic greenhouse gas concentrations.

Models project additional warming of 1.1 – 6.4°C and sea level rise of 18 - 59 cm by end of the 21st century.

Regional impacts are also likely, but specific projections are more uncertain than large-scale projections.

Page 28: The Science of Climate Change

Short List of Recommended Resources

• IPCC Assessment Reports– www.ipcc.ch

• Web pages– www.realclimate.org

• Books– Global Warming: The Complete Briefing

• John Houghton– The Science and Politics of Global Climate Change

• Andrew Dessler and Edward Parson– Surface Temperature Reconstructions for the Last 2000 Years

• National Research Council, 2006

• Data– World Data Center for Paleoclimatology

• www.ncdc.noaa.gov/paleo/data.html

Page 29: The Science of Climate Change

Extras

Page 30: The Science of Climate Change

Winter Temperature Trends (1976-2000)

Summer Temperature Trends (1976-2000)

IPCC TAR Fig 2.10

Jones et al. (2001)

Page 31: The Science of Climate Change

Around 10 million people in Bangladesh live less than 1 meter above sea level.

Page 32: The Science of Climate Change

Milankovich Cycles

Quinn, T.R. et al. "A Three Million Year Integration of the Earth's Orbit." The Astronomical Journal 101 pp. 2287-2305 (June 1991).

Page 33: The Science of Climate Change
Page 34: The Science of Climate Change
Page 35: The Science of Climate Change
Page 36: The Science of Climate Change
Page 37: The Science of Climate Change
Page 38: The Science of Climate Change

The global mean radiative forcing of the climate system for 2005 relative to 1750

IPCC WGI Fourth Assessment Report Figure SPM-2

Page 39: The Science of Climate Change

Geographic Distribution of Trends (1976 – 2000)

IPCC TAR Figure 2.9. Adapted from Jones, P.D., T.J. Osborn, K.R. Briffa, C.K. Folland, E.B. Horton, L.V. Alexander, D.E. Parker and N.A. Rayner, 2001: Adjusting for sampling density in grid box land and ocean surface temperature time series. J. Geophys. Res., 106, 3371-3380.

Page 40: The Science of Climate Change

Atmospheric “Governing Equations”

Conservation of momentum

Conservation of mass

Equation of state

Conservation of energy

Conservation of moisture

Climate models attempt to solve this system of equations numerically (i.e., with computers). Models attempt to reconstruct past climate and predict the future climate.

Page 41: The Science of Climate Change

Earth’s AtmosphereComposition:

78% nitrogen 21% oxygenother “trace” gases (water vapor, carbon dioxide, ozone, methane, etc.)

Density at surface: 1.275 kg/m3

Pressure at surface: 1 atm (14.7 lb/in2)

Troposphere (0-10 km)Stratosphere (10-50 km)Mesosphere (50-80 km)Thermosphere (above 80 km)

Average Surface Temp (15°C, 59°F)

Page 42: The Science of Climate Change
Page 43: The Science of Climate Change
Page 44: The Science of Climate Change

Earth’s Orbital Variations (Milankovitch Cycles)

Precession (23,000 year cycle)

Current Distance of Earth from Sun

January: Earth at 147 million km

July: Earth at 152 million km

Total Solar Irradiance at Top of Earth’s Atmosphere

7% diff in TSI between Jan/July

Data from SORCE/TIM Mission:

http://lasp.colorado.edu/sorce

Jan

July

Page 45: The Science of Climate Change

Earth’s Orbital Variations (Milankovitch Cycles)

http://www.homepage.montana.edu/~geol445/hyperglac/time1/milankov.htm

Eccentricity (100,000 year cycle)

Obliquity (41,000 year cycle)