The Role of Systematic review and Meta analysis in Scientific research- Pubrica.com

META ANALYSIS &SYSTEMATIC REVIEW

Publication Support | Research Services | Physician Writing | Scientific Communication Solution | Editing &Peer-Reviewing Copyright © 2019 pubrica. All rights reserved

META ANALYSIS


https://pubrica.com/services/research-services/meta-analysis/

Publication Support | Research Services | Physician Writing | Scientific Communication Solution | Editing &Peer-Reviewing

Copyright © 2019 pubrica. All rights reserved

Writing Meta Analysis

Pubrica has extensive experience in conducting meta-analysisa quantitative, formal, epidemiological study design used tosystematically assess the results of previous research to deriveconclusions about that body of research.

https://pubrica.com/services/research-services/meta-analysis/

https://pubrica.com/

As a general principle, generating, summarizing, and understandingthe best available evidence are essential for establishing thebenefits and safety of interventions.

A well designed and implemented meta-analysis study can be agreat benefit to society.

While meta-analysis has the potential to be a powerful tool inevaluating health care treatments and interventions, there aremany potential pitfalls and problems that are yet to be resolved.

A poorly performed meta-analysis can perpetuate biases from ill-conceived studies or lead to false conclusions.

Introduction

Copyright © 2019 pubrica. All rights reservedPublication Support | Research Services | Physician Writing | Scientific Communication Solution | Editing &Peer-Reviewing

Contd..

This, in turn, can cause consumers and caregivers, who frequently accessresults of meta-analysis through websites and popular press, to formincorrect conclusions and can result in inappropriate medical decisions.

While the idea behind combining studies to improve precision and poweris straightforward, the actual implementation of the process is difficult.

Those who act or react based on meta-analysis should understand thevarious biases that could be incorporated into a review.

Examples of some potential pitfalls in meta-analysis include publicationbias, pipeline bias, and English language bias.

In addition, combining studies that are not similar in study design,population, methods of analysis or outcome definitions can lead to biasesas well,which may result in spurious conclusions being drawn.

Copyright © 2019 pubrica. All rights reserved

Publication Support | Research Services | Physician Writing | Scientific Communication Solution | Editing &Peer-Reviewing

Moreover, a useful guide to improve reporting of systematic reviews and meta-analysis is the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-analysis) statement that replaced the QUOROM (Quality of Reporting of Meta-analysis) statemen.

We include all relevant studies, because loss of studies can lead to bias in the study.

Typically, published papers and abstracts are identified by a computerized literaturesearch of electronic databases that can include PubMed(www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov./entrez/query.fcgi), ScienceDirect (www.sciencedirect.com),Scirus (www.scirus.com/srsapp ), ISI Web of Knowledge(https://www.isiwebofknowledge.com), Google Scholar (https://scholar.google.com)and CENTRAL (Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials,https://www.mrw.interscience.wiley.com/cochrane/ochrane_clcentral_articles_fs.htm).

Guidelines for Reporting:

Detailed Literature Search:


Services

Heterogeneity is inherent in meta-analysis, not a problem to be solved.

It includes clinical components (eg,diversity in patient populations orinterventions) and statisticalcomponents (eg, random differences).

Heterogeneity


StatisticalAnalysis

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW


https://pubrica.com/services/research-services/systematic-review/

SystematicReview

Identifying a well-defined focused clinically relevant question,

Developing a detailed review protocol with strict inclusion and exclusion criteria,

Systematic literature search of multiple databases and unpublished data, inconsultation with a medical librarian,

Meticulous study identification and

Systematic data abstraction, by at least two sets of investigators independently,

Risk of bias assessment, and

Thoughtful quantitative synthesis through meta-analysis where relevant.

Performing a rigorous systematic review is multi-step process, which includes

Publication Support | Research Services | Physician Writing | Scientific Communication Solution | Editing &Peer-ReviewingCopyright © 2019 pubrica. All rights reserved

https://pubrica.com/services/research-services/systematic-review/

Formulate the research questionSearch for studiesSelection of studiesData collectionMethodology quality assessmentResults are analysed and presentedFindings are interpreted.

Publication Support | Research Services | Physician Writing | Scientific Communication Solution | Editing &Peer-ReviewingCopyright © 2019 pubrica. All rights reserved

GeneralStructure

Related Services

- For Plans and Packages Click here -

Publication SupportResearch ServicesPhysician WritingScientific CommunicationEditing and Translation

https://pubrica.com/pricing/

Contact Us

EMAIL ADDRESS

Get inTouch With Us

Freelancer

Consultant

Guest Blog Editor

[email protected]

PHONE NUMBER+91 9884350006+44- 74248 10299

EMAIL [email protected]


The Role of Systematic review and Meta analysis in Scientific research- Pubrica.com

Healthcare

Transcript of The Role of Systematic review and Meta analysis in Scientific research- Pubrica.com