The role of IR in Visceral Trauma
description
Transcript of The role of IR in Visceral Trauma
The role of IR in Visceral Trauma
Dr Robert MorganMRCP, FRCR, EBIR, FCIRSE
St George’s Hospital and Medical School, London
Financial Disclosures
Consultant: W Cook EuropeCovidienAngiodynamics
OVERVIEW
Introduction
Organ specific trauma Spleen Liver
Kidney
Introduction
Uncontrolled post-traumatic bleeding is the leading cause of potentially preventable death among trauma patients
up to 80% is due to visceral organ injury20% of pts have multiple vascular injuries
Visceral organ injury occurs in ~30% of abdominal trauma
Van der Vlies et al, Int J Emerg Med 2010World Health Organisation 2004Deunk J et al. Ann Surg 2010
Management optionsConservativeEmbolization
Surgery
Conservative Mangement
60 - 90% of blunt hepatic, renal or splenic injuries
Predictors of successHemodynamic stabilityLiver, Kidney trauma > Splenic traumaNo hemoperitoneum
Diamond et al. J Trauma 2009
EmbolizationIncreasingly used as a first interventional option vs surgery
Aim stop hemorrhage and minimize ischemia
Proximal vs Distal embolization– Sometimes SPEED is better than
OPTIMAL EMBOLIC DEPLOYMENT
Introduction Organ specific
Spleen Liver Kidney
SPLENIC TRAUMA
Most commonly injured abdominal organ (40%)
CirculationSplenic arteryCollaterals (eg short gastric a)
Moore et al, J Trauma 1995
AAST does NOT include active contrast extravasation and vascular injuries
Intervention vs conservative Rx
Conservative Rx of low grade AAST injuries is successful in >80-90% of pts
Failure of conservative Rx:High grade injuries (up to 70%) Contrast blush on CTA (up to 80%)Vascular injuries on CTA
Peitzman et al. J Trauma 2000
Indications for embolization
CT indications– Extravasation of contrast– Evidence of vascular injury
Vessel truncationPseudoaneurysmAV fistula
– AAST III-V (depending on haemodynamic stability)
Overall success 90%Schnuriger et al. J Trauma 2011
Technique of Embolization
Catheterize proximal splenic arterySidewinder vs Cobra
Technique of Embolization
Catheterize proximal splenic arterySidewinder vs Cobra
Decide whether to perform proximal vs distal Embolization
Technique of Embolization
Catheterize proximal splenic arterySidewinder vs Cobra
Decide whether to perform proximal vs distal Embolization
Distal embolizationMicrocatheter to site of vascular injury Coils, glue
Technique of Embolization
Catheterize proximal splenic arterySidewinder vs Cobra
Decide whether to perform proximal vs distal Embolization
Distal embolizationMicrocatheter to site of vascular injury Coils, glue
Proximal embolization Amplatzer plug vs Coils through selective catheter
Proximal embolization
Amplatzer 4 plug for proximal splenic Artery embolization in blunt traumaNg et al. al JVIR 2012;23:976-9
Similar success
Major complications requiring splenectomy are similar between two
groups
Hyposplenism after SAE?Bessoud et al. J Trauma 2007– Normal well perfused spleen after prox SAE n=24
Malhotra et al. J Trauma 2008– Splenectomy lower CD4+ cells, SAE normal levels, n=8
Tominaga et al. J Trauma 2009– No diff in immune markers SAE vs normal patients
Nakae et al. J Trauma 2009– No diff in immune markers SAE/partial splenectomy vs NOM, n=100
Malhotra et al. J Trauma 2010– No diff in immune markers SAE vs NOM, n=23
Splenic trauma Take Home Points
Conservative management for low grade injuriesEmbolization indicated for:– contrast extravasation– false aneurysm– AVF– high grade injuries
Proximal embolization is adequate Residual splenic function post SAE is satisfactory
Introduction Organ specific
SpleenLiver Kidney
HEPATIC TRAUMA
2nd most commonly injured organ
Right Lobe > left lobe
Dual blood supply– 80% Portal vein – 20% Hepatic artery
*cystic a & bile ducts
Remember the anatomic variants of the hepatic arteries
Remember the right hepatic artery arises from the SMA in 11%
Moore et al. J Trauma 1995
Conservative Management
Hemodynamically stable patients with no extravasation (even with extensive parenchymal injury)
>70% of all cases– Grade I - III – almost always – Grade IV-V – selective
Christmas AB et al. Surgery 2005
Primary Surgery
Grade IV-V + >2000ml fluid requirementsJuxtahepatic vein injuries - IVCExtra-hepatic portal vein laceration/rupture
Associated stomach/small or large bowel injury
Gaarder C, Int J Care Injured 2007Hagiwara A, J Trauma 2005
Indications for embolization
Blunt or penetrating trauma– Active bleeding/vascular injury on CT– Hemodynamic instability– Large Hemoperitoneum– Persistent bleeding after Surgery
Fang JF, J Trauma 2006, 61:547-53
Technique of EmbolizationSelective celiac/hepatic angiography to define site of injuryCatheterize common/proper hepatic artery
Sidewinder vs Cobra
Technique of EmbolizationSelective celiac/hepatic angiography to define site of injuryCatheterize common/proper hepatic artery
Sidewinder vs CobraDistal >>> proximal embolization
Technique of EmbolizationSelective celiac/hepatic angiography to define site of injuryCatheterize common/proper hepatic artery
Sidewinder vs CobraDistal >>> proximal embolizationMicrocatheter to site of injuryFront and back door embolizationCoilsglue
Overall success 80-100% Overall survival 88-100%
Complications of embolization
More likely if extensive injury requiring diffuse embolization
Overall 40-60% Necrosis 40%Abscess 17%Gallbladder necrosis 7%Biliary leak/biloma 20%
Gaarder et al. Injury 2007
Portal vein embolization
May have a role in recurrent hemorrhage
Little published data
High risk of hepatic ischemia
Liver Take Home Points
Conservative management for low grade injuries– even some IV and V
Know your vascular variant anatomy and also perform SMA angiography
Avoid proximal embolization unless absolutely necessary
Watch for complications after embolizationCT vs US
Introduction Organ specific
Spleen LiverKidney
RENAL TRAUMA
3rd most common injured organ
Commonest in children
Moore et al. J Trauma 1995
Conservative Management
Growing trend for Grades I-IVAdvantages:– ↓ 3-6x need for nephrectomy– ↓ hospital stay– No increase in complications or long-term
hypertensionSuccess rate: 80 - 100%Success rate: children > adults
Santucci et al. J Trauma 2006
Indications for embolization
Renovascular injuries (unstable)Stab/penetrating woundsIncreasing transfusion requirements
Active hemorrhage on CTA
Constantinos et al. CVIR 2005
Technique of Embolization
Selective angiography to define site of injuryCobra vs Sidewinder vs Sos omni
Distal embolization >>> Proximal embolization
Technique of Embolization
Selective angiography to define site of injuryCobra vs Sidewinder vs Sos omni
Distal embolization >>> Proximal embolization
Microcatheter to site of injuryEmbolize feeding artery
(back door occlusion not necessary)
Coils – glue
Follow up
3 days 3 weeks 5 weeks
Outcomes of Embolization
Overall success rate ~90-95%
Significant complications <5%
Constantinos et al. CVIR 2005
Kidney Take home points
Literature increasingly supports conservative management or embolization vs Surgery
Renal Injuries tend to recover well
Super selective embolization is safe and effective
If possible, distal embolization should be performed
CONCLUSIONS
Conservative management for majority of patients
CONCLUSIONS
Conservative management for majority of patients
Embolization is effective and safe
CONCLUSIONS
Conservative management for majority of patients
Embolization is effective and safe
“Embolization first - before surgery” strategy is being increasingly used
CONCLUSIONS
Conservative management for majority of patients
Embolization is effective and safe
“Embolization first - before surgery” strategy is being increasingly used
Embolization is indicated if there is active hemorrhage on CTA
CONCLUSIONS
Conservative management for majority of patients
Embolization is effective and safe
“Embolization first - before surgery” strategy is being increasingly used
Embolization is indicated if there is active hemorrhage on CTA
Embolization of visceral trauma is a classic IR procedure that all IRs must be able to perform
You are all very welcome to the CIRSE 2013 congress!
400 splenic embolisations
54 low grade AAST injuries upgraded to 4a/b – 20/54 would have NOM by
AAST– 16/20 had splenic
embolisation and 2 had splenectomy
Marmery et al. AJR 2007
Proximal or distal?
15 of 147All retrospective, no RCTs, n=497Mostly AAST Grade III+
But...
Frequent complications with or without surgery– 50% with Grade III+
No RCTs/observational studies convincingly prove embolotherapy promotes complications
Consensus on GU trauma. BJU 2004