The role of complement testing in dermatology
Transcript of The role of complement testing in dermatology
The role of complement testing in dermatology
S. Jamal and S. Jolles*
Department of Clinical Immunology, The Royal Free Hospital, London, and *National Institute for Medical Research, Division of Infection and Immunity,
Mill Hill, London, UK
Summary An up-to-date knowledge of the molecular events involved in the activation and
control of the complement cascade is essential to understand the pathogenesis of a
number of conditions presenting to dermatologists. This knowledge underpins the
pathogenesis of these conditions but allows the clinician to request the most useful tests
in terms of diagnosis and monitoring. In this review we aim to discuss complement
biology, the diseases in which complement testing is of particular relevance, the types
of laboratory tests available, their utility and interpretation. Additionally it is of critical
importance for clinicians not only to choose the most appropriate tests but also to
choose to send these to an appropriately accredited laboratory.
Introduction
Many conditions present to dermatology in which
evaluation of the complement system plays a significant
role in the diagnosis and monitoring. These include,
hypocomplementemic urticarial vasculitis syndrome
(HUVS), types 1 and 2 hereditiary angioedema (HAE),
acquired angioedema (AAE), cryoglobulinaemia, con-
nective tissue disease including systemic lupus erythe-
matosis (SLE), and complement deficiencies. The
complement system is part of the innate immune system
and consists of more than 30 heat-labile serum proteins.
These are present as inactive precursors which, once
activated, act as enzymes cleaving several molecules of
the next component in the sequence. Each precursor is
split into two or more fragments. The major fragment
usually has two biologically active sites, one binds to cell
membranes and the other enzymatically activates the
next component, while the minor fragment has inflam-
matory and chemotactic properties. The cascade is
controlled by complement inhibitors and the sponta-
neous decay of any exposed attachment sites. The main
functions of complement are to promote inflammation,
the opsonization and lysis of microorganisms, and
removal of immune complexes.
The complement cascade
There are three pathways leading to complement
activation, the classical pathway (CP), the lectin path-
way (LP) and the alternative pathway (AP). All path-
ways converge on C3, the cleavage of which results in
the formation of the C5 convertases (classical, C3b4b2a
and alternative, C3bBbP) and subsequent activation of
the final lytic pathway and membrane attack complex
(MAC) (Fig. 1).1,2
The CP is activated by immune complex formation.
The first complement component is C1 comprising of
subunits C1q, C1r, C1s. The C1q has six globular heads
which bind the Fc fragments of IgG and IgM antibodies
bound to antigen. C1s then cleaves C4 into C4a and C4b
which when surface bound acts as a binding site for C2,
which is in turn cleaved by C1s releasing C2b and in
binding C2a forms the CP C3 convertase C4b2a.
In an analogous manner to the CP the LP is activated
when lectins, synthesized mainly by the liver, bind to
carbohydrates. Mannose binding lectin (MBL), binds to
sugar residues on the microbial cell surface and
mannan associated serine proteases (MASPs), counter-
parts of C1r and C1s, cleave C4 and C2.3 From that
point C4b and C2a form the CP C3 convertase, and
activation proceeds to the terminal components.
Correspondence: S. Jolles, National Institute for Medical Research, Division
of Infection and Immunity, Mill Hill, London, UK.
E-mail: [email protected]
Accepted for publication 21 December 2004
Clinical dermatology • Review article doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2230.2005.01784.x
� 2005 Blackwell Publishing Ltd • Clinical and Experimental Dermatology, 30, 321–326 321
Unlike the CP or LP activation of the AP does not
require antibody or lectin as it continuously turns over
on a small scale termed ‘C3 tickover’. Attachment of C3
to a surface lacking complement regulators (e.g. a
bacterial or fungal cell surface) allows rapid amplifica-
tion via a feedback loop (Fig. 1) with the generation of
the AP C3 convertase (C3bBb) when factor B attaches to
target bound C3b, and is cleaved by factor D. Properdin
stabilizes the convertase. The principal C3 convertase
regulator, Factor H (a plasma protein) acts by compet-
ing with Bb preventing further activation of the
complement cascade. The remaining C3a is catabolized
to smaller products by Factor I.
The terminal pathway leads to formation of the MAC.
This begins with the enzymatic cleavage of C5 by its
convertases (classical, C3b4b2a and alternative,
C3bBbP), the remaining steps are nonenzymatic. C5b
binds C6 forming C5b6 which binds C7 to form C5b67
which is hydrophobic and inserts into cell membranes.
C8 and up to 14 C9 monomers then bind sequentially to
form a pore–the MAC leading to cell lysis.
In view of the proinflammatory and potentially
damaging nature of the complement system it is very
tightly controlled. This occurs passively in that the half-
life of the active sites on C3b and C4b are very short and
the complexes (C4b2a and C3bBb) are inherently
unstable. Active control is achieved by inhibitors and
inactivators which block initiation, prevent amplifica-
tion of the C3 and C5 convertases, and inhibit the
terminal MAC. C1-inh, a serine protease, prevents
excessive activation of the CP and LP by cleaving the
C1 complex and blocking the active sites on C1r, C1s
and MASPs.4 Convertase regulation is performed by fac-
tor I (C3b-inactivator). The inhibitors include mem-
brane bound proteins (decay accelerating factor,
complement receptor 1, membrane cofactor protein)
and plasma proteins (C4b-binding protein and factor H).
Finally CD59 on cells, protein S (vitronectin) and
Figure 1 The complement cascade. The three pathways leading to complement activation are, the classical pathway (CP), the lectin
pathway (LP) and the alternative pathway (AP) which all converge on C3, the cleavage of which results in the formation of the C5
convertases (classical, C3b4b2a and alternative, C3bBbP) and subsequent activation of the terminal pathway and membrane attack
complex resulting in cell lysis. The coloured lines show the components tested in the functional assays CH50 and AP50. Mannan binding
lectin (MBL), mannan associated serine protease (MASP), alternative pathway 50 assay (AP50), classical pathway haemolytic assay
50 (CH50), antibody (Ab), membrane attack complex (MAC).
322 � 2005 Blackwell Publishing Ltd • Clinical and Experimental Dermatology, 30, 321–326
Complement testing in dermatology • S. Jamal and S. Jolles
possibly clusterin in plasma block insertion of the MAC
into the cell membrane. Deficiency of these regulatory
proteins leads to excessive complement consumption,
inflammation, tissue destruction and depletion of C3 or
other components downstream of the missing control
protein.
Genetics
The majority of the complement components, with the
exception of properdin which has an X-linked pattern
of inheritance, are inherited in an autosomal codomi-
nant pattern (C1-inh, C2, C3, C5, C6, C7 and C9
which is more frequent in Japan). Heterozygotes
generally have levels of that component below the
mean of the normal range. C1-inh deficiency occurs
most commonly in the heterozygous state. The genet-
ics of C1, C4 and C8 are more complicated as multiple
genes are involved and all components of C1 (C1q,
C1r and C1s) are required to form a functional
complex. C4 exists in humans in two forms, C4A
which binds proteins and C4B which binds carbohy-
drate residues on cells. C4A deficiency is increased in
white patients with SLE (8–12%) vs. controls (1–3%).5
C8 is made up of three chains which are all needed for
MAC function.
Clinical conditions
HAE is, in the majority of cases, due to heterozygous
deficiency of C1-inh and is characterized by recurrent
episodes of nonpainful, nonpruritic and nonerythema-
tous subcutaneous and submucosal oedema that spon-
taneously subsides in 48–72 h. It is not accompanied by
urticarial wheals and is not responsive to antihista-
mines, steroids or b agonists.6
There are two forms of HAE, Type I which accounts
for 85% is caused by gene mutations resulting in low
levels of C1-inh, and Type II which accounts for 15% is
due to a point mutation leading to a dysfunctional C1-
inh protein present in normal to high amounts,7,8 a
third type of HAE involves C1-inh binding to albumin.
One recent study describes a further type of HAE in
which all the patients were female and had findings
consistent with HAE but normal C1-inh level and
function.9 The nature of the defect has not been
identified.
There are two types of AAE the first occurs predom-
inantly in the setting of B-cell lymphoproliferative
disorders with C1-inh depletion occurring due to the
formation of idiotype-anti-idiotype immune complexes
involving the paraprotein secreted by the tumour.10 In
the second less common form an autoantibody to C1-
inh blocks its function11 and this is most commonly
associated with lymphoproliferative disease (oligo or
monoclonal gammopathies), autoimmune haemolytic
anaemia and chronic infection.1 In both forms antigenic
C4 and functional C1-inh levels are profoundly
depressed and levels of C1q may be particularly low in
AAE differentiating this from HAE.12
Patients with HUVS have an autoantibody to the
collagen-like region of C1q which activates the CP.13–15
This is also present in about 30% of patients with SLE.
HUVS is characterized by urticaria with hypocomple-
mentaemia (low CH50, C1q, C2 and C4), skin lesions
which may persist for more than 72 h and leave
residual staining; renal involvement occurs in 40% and
obstructive lung disease has been documented.
The most common presentation of early complement
component (C1, C4 or C2) deficiency is with an
autoimmune disease and the strongest association is
with SLE. These patients also have a higher than normal
incidence of encapsulated bacterial infections. The
incidence of SLE in patients with C1q, C4 or C2
deficiency is 90%, 75% and approximately 15%,
respectively.16 Partial C4 deficiency is also associated
with SLE; 15% of patients having C4A deficiency and
patients with C4A or C4B deficiency can have border-
line normal C4 levels. SLE patients with complement
deficiencies have characteristic features with early onset
of disease, photosensitivity, less renal disease and anti-
Ro ⁄ La antinuclear antibodies in two thirds.5 Measure-
ment of C3 and C4 is useful in monitoring the disease
activity in SLE in general, but low levels should be
interpreted in the light of any component deficiency. A
two- to threefold increase in MBL deficiency has been
reported in patients with SLE17 and these patients may
have more severe infections. The clinical utility of MBL
measurement in this setting however, remains to be
established.
Patients with C3 and terminal complement compo-
nent deficiencies present with pyogenic infections
particularly with encapsulated organisms (Streptococ-
cus pneumoniae and Haemophilus influenza type b).
Deficiency of C3, the major opsonin results in severe
recurrent infections with a spectrum similar to hypo-
gammaglobulinaemia as does acquired C3 deficiency
(Factor H or I deficiency or C3 nephritic factor), it is
also associated with glomerulonephritis. Terminal
complement pathway components (C5, C6, C7, C8
and C9) and properdin result in recurrent neisserial
infections. Factor H deficiency is also associated with
glomerulonephritis and haemolytic uraemic syndrome.
Defects in the terminal pathway result in low CP
� 2005 Blackwell Publishing Ltd • Clinical and Experimental Dermatology, 30, 321–326 323
Complement testing in dermatology • S. Jamal and S. Jolles
(CH50) and low AP (AP50) pathway function
(Table 1).
Leucocyte adhesion deficiency type 1 is a deficiency of
complement receptor 3, an integrin that binds the
degradation products of C3b. It is first suspected at birth
because of delayed separation of the umbilical cord and
usually results in death in childhood due to recurrent
infections and abscesses of soft tissues and mucosal
surfaces.18
Mixed cryoglobulinaemia is often caused by the
immune response to hepatitis C virus or by complexes
with rheumatoid factor. Patients with cryoglobulinae-
mia form complement fixing immune complexes which
cause inflammation in joints and nerves.19 Complement
testing reveals low C4 and normal or less commonly low
C3 (Table 1).
Acquired complement deficiency states may occur
due to the formation of C3 and C4 nephritic factors,
autoantibodies which bind to and stabilize the C3
convertases of the alternate and classical pathways
(Table 1). This results in secondary C3 deficiency and
classically presents with the triad of membranoprolifer-
ative glomerulonephritis, partial lipodystrophy and
bacterial infections20 although features such as partial
lipodystrophy may also present in isolation. Synthetic
failure of complement components may also occur in
advanced liver disease.
Laboratory testing and interpretation
Complement testing involves measurement of individual
components or measurement of function of the CP
(CH50 assay) and the AP (AP50 assay). Complement
components are measured using a nephelometer or
turbidometer and monospecific antisera or by radial
immunodiffusion (RID). The most commonly measured
components are C3 and C4 with low C4 suggesting
activation of the CP (Table 1). The specific antiserum
Table 1 Patterns of complement assay results in clinical settings. It is important to note that as many of the complement components are
acute phase reactants, decreases due to activation may be masked by increases in the synthesis rates during an inflammatory episode.
Complement component levels, e.g. C3 may also be low due to synthetic failure in particular in advanced liver disease. Transient activation
and depletion of complement components can also occur in ischaemic organ injury, trauma, burns, sepsis, viraemia and some drug
reactions. Measurement of split products can be used to determine whether activation has occurred, because their increase occurs only
when the complement enzymes are formed and active. In addition the pathway of activation can be determined; C4a and C4d are markers
of classical or lectin pathway activation, Bb is a marker of alternative pathway activation and C3a, iC3b, C3d, C5a and soluble C5b-9 can be
used to determine terminal pathway activation. These tests are however, not routinely available.
Clinical condition
Classical
pathway (CH50)
Alternative
pathway (AP50) C3 C4
C1-inh
antigenic
C1-inh
functional Process
Deficiencies
C1q, C1r ⁄ C1s, C4
or C2 deficiency*
0 Normal Normal Normal* Normal Normal Classical pathway
Factor D or properdin
deficiency
Normal 0 or very low Normal Normal Normal Normal Alternative
pathway
C3, C5, C6, C7, C8,
deficiencies
0 or very low 0 or very low Low or normal Normal Normal Normal C3 or C9
terminal
component
Consumption states
SLE, cryoglobulinaemia,
HUVS, serum sickness
Low Normal or low Normal or low Low Variable Variable Classical pathway
Sepsis, post-
streptococcal
glomerulonephritis
Normal or
slightly low
Low Low Normal Normal Normal Alternative
Pathway
Severe SLE, membrano-
proliferative GN Type 1,
major proteinuria
Low Low Low Low Variable Variable Both pathways
Failure of regulation
HAE, AAE Low Normal Normal or
slightly low
Very low Very low
to normal
Very low Classical pathway
Factor H or I deficiencies,
C3 nephritic factor
Normal to low Very low to 0 Low Normal Normal Normal Alternative pathway
*In C4 deficiency levels of C4 will be correspondingly low.
324 � 2005 Blackwell Publishing Ltd • Clinical and Experimental Dermatology, 30, 321–326
Complement testing in dermatology • S. Jamal and S. Jolles
binds to the component forming an immunoprecipitate
(Ipp) suspended in aqueous solution. The nephelometer
measures the intensity of light scattered by the Ipp and
the turbidimeter the decrease in light intensity. These
values are then converted into a concentration.
The CH50 and AP50 are haemolytic assays based on
the ability of patient serum to lyse antibody-coated
sheep erythrocytes or chicken erythrocytes (which have
the unique property of activating the AP by activating
C3b),5 respectively. Briefly, in the CH50 agarose gel
containing red blood cells coated with rabbit antisheep
antibody is incubated with human serum (at 4 �C), C1binds, activating the complement cascade and MAC
which results in lysis of the erythrocytes causing a clear
zone in the plate. The antibody concentration and gel
thickness are uniform allowing quantification of the
area of lysis which is proportional to the amount of
complement components. A calibration curve is run
alongside patient sera; the diameter of the test sample is
then read from this curve and a percentage normal
complement activity is generated. The CH50 value
denotes the amount of serum required to lyse 50% of the
antibody-coated erythrocytes. In the CH100 assay the
value reported is the concentration at 100% of lysis.
The function of the lectin pathway may be measured
using an ELISA in which patients serum is plated into
wells coated with mannan.21 After MBL binds to the
mannan coated surface, the MASP enzymes cleave C4
and the resulting C4b and C4d that are deposited on the
plate can be measured using enzyme conjugated
monoclonal antibodies.
C1-inh and C3d are measured using RID where
specific antibody to it is incorporated into an agar
plate and test serum is placed into a well. An immune
complex is formed producing a precipitin ring, at
‘completion’ ) where equilibrium is achieved between
the two, the size of the ring is proportional to the
C1-inh concentration as that of the antibody is
constant.12
It is important to be aware of the external quality
assurance (National External Quality Assurance
Scheme; NEQAS) and accreditation (Clinical Pathology
Accreditation UK; CPA) of the laboratory to which
blood is sent to ensure the precision, accuracy and
reliability of the results and their interpretation. Liaison
with the Clinical Immunologist may be useful to
optimize investigations best suited for the clinical
condition and allow appropriate collection, storage
and timing of sample.
Acknowledgements
We thank Lesley MacNeill for expert assistance with
Fig. 1 and Dr Jenny Hughes for careful reading of the
manuscript.
References
1 Walport MJ. Complement. First of two parts. N Engl J Med
2001; 344: 1058–66.
2 Walport MJ. Complement. Second of two parts. N Engl J
Med 2001; 344: 1140–4.
3 Matsushita M. The lectin pathway of the complement
system. Microbiol Immunol 1996; 40: 887–93.
4 Davies AEI. C1 inhibitor gene and hereditary angioedema.
In: The Human Complement System in Health and Disease
(Volanakis, JE, Frank, MM, eds). New York: Marcel Dekker
1998, 229–44.
5 Wen L, Atkinson JP, Giclas PC. Clinical and laboratory
evaluation of complement deficiency. J Allergy Clin Immu-
nol 2004; 113: 585–93; quiz 94.
6 FrankMM,Gelfand JA,Atkinson JP.Hereditary angioedema:
the clinical syndrome and its management. Ann Intern Med
1976; 84: 580–93.
7 Frank MM. Hereditary Angioedema. In: Complement in
Health and Disease. (Whaley, K, Loos, MM, Weiler, JM, eds).
Dordrect: Kluwer Academic 1993.
8 Cicardi M, Agostoni A. Hereditary angioedema. N Engl J
Med 1996; 334: 1666–7.
9 Bork K, Barnstedt SE, Koch P, Traupe H. Hereditary
angioedema with normal C1-inhibitor activity in women.
Lancet 2000; 356: 213–7.
10 Geha RS, Quinti I, Austen KF et al. Acquired C1 inhibitor
deficiency associated with anti-idiotype antibody to
monoclonal immunoglobulins. N Engl J Med 1985; 312:
534–40.
11 Alsenz J, Bork K, Loos MM. Autoantibody-mediated
acquired deficiency of C1 inhibitor. N Engl J Med 1987;
316: 1360–6.
12 Glovsky MM. Applications of complement determinations
in human disease. Ann Allergy 1994; 72: 477–86 (quiz
86–90).
13 Wisnieski JJ, Jones SM. IgG autoantibody to the collagen-
like region of Clq in hypocomplementemic urticarial
vasculitis syndrome, systemic lupus erythematosus, and
6 other musculoskeletal or rheumatic diseases.
J Rheumatol 1992; 19: 884–8.
14 Wisnieski JJ, Baer AN, Christensen J et al. Hypocomple-
mentemic urticarial vasculitis syndrome. Clinical and
serologic findings in 18 patients. Medicine (Baltimore)
1995; 74: 24–41.
15 Wisnieski JJ. Urticarial vasculitis. Curr Opin Rheumatol
2000; 12: 24–31.
� 2005 Blackwell Publishing Ltd • Clinical and Experimental Dermatology, 30, 321–326 325
Complement testing in dermatology • S. Jamal and S. Jolles
16 Pickering MC, Botto M, Taylor PR et al. Systemic lupus
erythematosus, complement deficiency, and apoptosis. Adv
Immunol 2000; 76: 227–324.
17 Kilpatrick DC. Mannan-binding lectin. clinical significance
and applications. Biochim Biophys Acta 2002; 1572:
401–13.
18 Thompson C. Protein proves to be a key link in innate
immunity. Science 1995; 269: 301–2.
19 Cacoub P, Costedoat-Chalumeau N, Lidove O, Alric L.
Cryoglobulinemia vasculitis. Curr Opin Rheumatol 2002;
14: 29–35.
20 Levy Y, George J, Yona E, Shoenfeld Y. Partial lipodystro-
phy, mesangiocapillary glomerulonephritis, and comple-
ment dysregulation. An autoimmune phenomenon.
Immunol Res 1998; 18: 55–60.
21 Giglas PC. Choosing complement tests: differentiating
between hereditary and acquired deficiency. In: Manual of
Clinical Laboratory Immunology, 6th edn. (Rose, NR, Ham-
ilton, RG, Detrick, B, eds), Washington: ASM Publications
1997, 111–6.1
Key points
• Complement testing is of utility in hereditary angioede-
ma, acquired angioedema, connective tissue disease (e.g.
SLE), HUVs, mixed cryoglobulinaemia, and deficiency
states due to genetic defects and synthetic failure.
• Complement is activated by three pathways, the classical
pathway (immune complexes), the mannan binding
lectin pathway (sugars) and the alternative pathway
(bacterial cell walls).
• The main functions of complement are to promote
inflammation, the opsonization and lysis of microor-
ganisms, and removal of immune complexes.
• Complement assessment is made by both antigenic test-
ing of components and functional assays of the classical
and alternative pathways (CH50, AP50 and C1-inh).
• The laboratory should have appropriate accreditation
(Clinical Pathology Accreditation UK; CPA) and liaison
with the Clinical Immunologist may be useful in plan-
ning testing.
326 � 2005 Blackwell Publishing Ltd • Clinical and Experimental Dermatology, 30, 321–326
Complement testing in dermatology • S. Jamal and S. Jolles