The Role of Academic Entrepreneurship in Oresund and Moscow State University
-
Upload
peter-kiryushin -
Category
Business
-
view
455 -
download
1
description
Transcript of The Role of Academic Entrepreneurship in Oresund and Moscow State University
Peter Kiryushin, Bala Mulloth, Tatiana Iakovleva
FORFI case workshop of 2012, 14 – 15 June, Oslo
A Comparative View on the Role of Academic Entrepreneurship in
Regional Innovations Systems of Oresund and Moscow
• Graduated from: Moscow State University (MSU), Economics & Crisis management. 2nd degree: Lund University (Sweden) and Central European University (Hungary)
• Defended PhD; Research Fellow at MSU. Previous research projects: Business-Government Relations, Changing Behavior, Energy Oresund
• OECD Workshop on Eco-Innovations, UNESCO Chair Conference on Sustainability in Higher Education , Changing Behavior Workshops; internship at Russian Union of Business Angels; bottom-up initiatives in HEIs
• AE paper accepted to publish at the 7th conference on Innovation & Entrepreneurship
About me
How collaboration and entrepreneurial education in universities is conducive to the implementation and commercialization of
research-based innovations?
• “Best regions” vs. “regional realism”• Why it is important to make academia more entrepreneurial?
(to improve entr`l capital of RIS or to achieve specific goals?)• Who should be more entrepreneurial – researchers,
students? • What kind of innovations should be developed in a specific
region?• Cross-border/ national/ local cases for AE• How to measure efficiency of promotion of
entrepreneurship?• Factors for innovation & entrepreneurship?
Some issues to consider
Source: IIIEE 2011
Oresund RIS
• Academic capacity• Scandinavian context • Cross-border collaboration• Leading for cleantech• Medicon Valley
Moscow RIS
The value for the AE project
• Academic capacity• Transition economy• Relevant to post soviet• Need for modernization• Success in the past
Step 1: Literature reviewon academic entrepreneurship , cross-
border innovation system and cleantech
Step 2: Interviewingexperts in entrepreneurship and innovation,
researchers, business people
Literature reviewprovided generally positive knowledge on
the Öresund RIS development, based on the studying of the past trends
Interviewsgave the different perspectives. “Pieces of
puzzle”, concerning the current stage and the future, based on the individual experience,
research results and personal reflections
Entrepreneurship then and now
Strategies for cleantech–industry
collaboration Medicon Valley and gatekeepers
Öresund Entrepreneurship Academy and LUIS
When networks and clusters are efficient?
Biotech companies moved to more attractive regions!
Development of cross-border relations takes time
Are social innovations coming?
Skepticism about the future transnational
collaboration
1990’s – mid 2000’s: policy-cooperation,
rise of biotech & pharmaceuticals, bridging the sides
Stages of cross-border innovation collaboration
mid 2000’s – nowadays: sober view on the
networking, scientific and economic results of
cooperation
nowadays – the future: “climate-smart region”,
role of cleantech development and entrepreneurship?
Sjælland -20% GHG by 2020 (to 1990
level)
• København carbon-neutral in 2025
Skåne-30% GHG by 2020
(to 1990 level)
•Albertslund -25% GHG by 2015:
• Ballerup 25% RES by 2015
• Malmö100% RES by 2025
• Kristianstad-20% GHG by 2020
(to 1990 level)
• Lund-50% GHG by 2020
(to 1990 level)
ÖRESUND LOW-CARBON GOALS
(Academic) Entrepreneurship
and Russian oligarchs
State demand for innovations in Soviet time (Space, military)
Old-school researchers and
new entrepreneurs
Who and how should we teach
Importance of personal relations
Lack of interests, infrastructure and effective
policy support
Innovation and window-dressing
Demand for cleantech innovations (energy
efficiency?)
Optimism regarding the future of entrepreneurship
How collaboration and entrepreneurial education in universities is conducive to the implementation and commercialization of
research-based innovations?
• “Best regions” vs.“regional realism”• Why it is important to make academia more entrepreneurial?
(to improve entr`l capital of RIS or to achieve specific goals?)• Who should be more entrepreneurial – researchers,
students? • What kind of innovations should be developed in a specific
region?• Cross-border/ national/ local cases for AE• How to measure efficiency of promotion of
entrepreneurship?• Factors for innovation & entrepreneurship?
Some issues to consider
Sociotechnical Network
How to involve different audiences in AE?• Make outcomes interesting for different audiences, handbook,
toolkit, web-site, table, course on AE
Workshop itself as a case for AERole of bottom-up initiatives?How to measure outcomes of development of AE?
Some issues to consider (2)
Thank You!Tak! Спасибо!