The Rise in Long-Term Unemployment: Causes, Effects, and Policy Options
-
Upload
congressional-budget-office -
Category
News & Politics
-
view
2.778 -
download
2
description
Transcript of The Rise in Long-Term Unemployment: Causes, Effects, and Policy Options
Congressional Budget Office
The Rise in Long-Term Unemployment: Causes, Effects, and Policy Options
February 20, 2014
Presentation to the Winter Policy Forum of the National Association of State Workforce Agencies William J. Carrington Microeconomic Studies Division
Full reports: Understanding and Responding to Persistently High Unemployment, www.cbo.gov/publication/42989; Unemployment Insurance in the Wake of the Recent Recession, www.cbo.gov/publication/43734
C O N G R E S S I O N A L B U D G E T O F F I C E
Unemployment and Long-Term Unemployment Were Very High During and After the Recession
■ The unemployment rate rose from less than 5 percent in most of 2007 to 9.6 percent in 2010, and it has now fallen to 6.6 percent.
■ Unemployment initially rose mostly because of a large number of layoffs and plant closings in 2008 and 2009.
■ Long-term unemployment (defined as being unemployed for more than 26 consecutive weeks) rose to a historic high; during a typical month since 2010, roughly 40 percent of unemployed people have been unemployed for more than 26 weeks.
C O N G R E S S I O N A L B U D G E T O F F I C E
Unemployment Rate, 1981 to 2013
(Percentage of labor force)
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
1981 1983 1985 1987 1989 1991 1993 1995 1997 1999 2001 2003 2005 2007 2009 2011 2013
C O N G R E S S I O N A L B U D G E T O F F I C E
Long-Term Unemployment Rate, 1981 to 2013
(Percentage of labor force)
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
1981 1983 1985 1987 1989 1991 1993 1995 1997 1999 2001 2003 2005 2007 2009 2011 2013
All Unemployed
Unemployed for More Than 26 Weeks
C O N G R E S S I O N A L B U D G E T O F F I C E
Relationship Between the Unemployment Rate and the Long-Term Unemployed as a Share of All Unemployed, 1982 to 2011
(Long-term unemployment as a percentage of all unemployed)
0
10
20
30
40
50
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12Unemployment Rate (Percent)
1982 to 2007
2008 to 2011
2008
2009
2010
1983
1982
2011
C O N G R E S S I O N A L B U D G E T O F F I C E
Employment-to-Population Ratio, 1981 to 2013
(Percent)
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
1981 1983 1985 1987 1989 1991 1993 1995 1997 1999 2001 2003 2005 2007 2009 2011 2013
C O N G R E S S I O N A L B U D G E T O F F I C E
Employment-to-Population Ratio for Men and Women, 1981 to 2013
(Percent)
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
1981 1986 1991 1996 2001 2006 20110
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
1981 1986 1991 1996 2001 2006 2011
Men Women
C O N G R E S S I O N A L B U D G E T O F F I C E
Causes of High Unemployment and Long-Term Unemployment
■ Weak demand for goods and services as a result of the recession and its aftermath
■ Mismatches between the needs of employers and the skills and location of the unemployed
■ Incentives from extensions of unemployment insurance (UI) – Reduced incentives to take jobs – Increased incentives to stay in the labor force and therefore be
counted as unemployed (rather than being counted as out of the labor force)
■ Real and perceived erosion of skills and motivations of the long-term unemployed
C O N G R E S S I O N A L B U D G E T O F F I C E
Gross Domestic Product Gap, 1981 to 2024
(Percentage of potential gross domestic product)
-10
-8
-6
-4
-2
0
2
4
6
1981 1984 1987 1990 1993 1996 1999 2002 2005 2008 2011 2014 2017 2020 2023
C O N G R E S S I O N A L B U D G E T O F F I C E
Outlays for Unemployment Benefits, by Fiscal Year, 2000 to 2024
(Billions of dollars)
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
2000 2003 2006 2009 2012 2015 2018 2021 2024
Emergency Benefits and Federal Additional
Compensation
Regular and Extended Benefits
[Labeling corrected on March 13, 2014]
C O N G R E S S I O N A L B U D G E T O F F I C E
Consequences of High Unemployment and Long-Term Unemployment
■ Reduced earnings after job loss – Workers’ earnings would be lower for many years after job loss
■ Lower long-term earnings for workers entering the labor force during periods of high unemployment
■ Job loss is bad for health – Increased rates of depression and death
■ Some evidence that recessions are good for health in general
■ Effects on educational attainment and future earnings of workers who lose jobs
C O N G R E S S I O N A L B U D G E T O F F I C E
Policies to Reduce Unemployment
■ Fiscal policies
■ Training policies
■ Unemployment insurance
■ Job-search assistance
C O N G R E S S I O N A L B U D G E T O F F I C E
Some Fiscal Policies to Reduce Unemployment
■ Household assistance – Increased UI expenditures – More generous refundable tax credits – Reduced employees’ payroll taxes
■ Business assistance – Reduced employers’ payroll taxes – Allowing full or partial expensing of investment costs
■ Aid to state governments
C O N G R E S S I O N A L B U D G E T O F F I C E
Training Policies to Reduce Unemployment
■ General workforce programs
■ Sectoral programs – Health care – Information technology
■ Programs focused on youth – Career academies – Apprenticeship programs
■ Programs focused on displaced workers
C O N G R E S S I O N A L B U D G E T O F F I C E
Modifying UI Policy to Reduce Unemployment
■ Extend the duration of UI benefits
■ Offer reemployment bonuses
■ Establish personal reemployment accounts
■ Offer short-time compensation
■ Target services
■ Use UI benefits to temporarily place the unemployed in jobs with private-sector employers
■ Offer wage/earnings insurance
C O N G R E S S I O N A L B U D G E T O F F I C E
Assistance to Unemployed Workers
■ Increased job-search assistance
■ Skill certification programs
■ Housing mobility assistance