The right to paid annual leave: implications of accession
description
Transcript of The right to paid annual leave: implications of accession
The right to paid annual The right to paid annual leave:leave:implications of implications of accessionaccession
Prof. dr. sc. Željko PotočnjakProf. dr. sc. Željko Potočnjak
Andrea GrgićAndrea Grgić
Iva ČatipovićIva Čatipović
17 April 201417 April 2014
DubrovnikDubrovnik
Historical Development – Historical Development – international levelinternational levelfirst time recognised:
◦ 1936 ILO ILO Holidays with Pay Convention (No. 52) 1936 Recommendation No. 47 1954 Recommendation No. 98
◦ 1970 ILO Holidays with Pay Convention (Revised; No. 132)
included in all mayor documents on human rights:◦ UN:UN:
1948 The Universal Declaration on Human Rights (Article 24)
1966 The International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (Article 7 (d))
◦ CoE:CoE: 1961 The European Social Charter (Article 2, point 3) and 1996 The Revised European Social Charter
Faculty of Law University of Zagreb 2
Development at the EU Development at the EU levellevel1. The Community Charter of the Fundamental Rights of Workers (1989)
2. Directive 93/104/EC concerning certain aspects of the organization of working
time
3. Directive 2000/34/EC amending Council Directive 93/104/EC concerning
certain aspects of the organization of working time to cover sectors and
activities excluded from that Directive
4. Directive 2003/88/EC concerning certain aspects of the organization of
working time (WTDWTD)
5. The Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU (Art. 31. (2)) (2000)
6.6. case law of the CJEUcase law of the CJEU
Faculty of Law University of Zagreb 3
Development at EU levelDevelopment at EU level
Faculty of Law University of Zagreb 4
• the scope ratione personae • C-133/00, Bowden; • C-519/09, May; • C-337/10, Neidel
• minimum period of employment as a precondition for entitlement to paid annual leave
• C-173/99, BECTU
• relationship between paid annual leave and maternity leave
• C-342/01, Merino Gomez
• relationsip between paid anuual leave and sick leave
• C-350/06, 520/06 Joined cases Schultz-Hoff and Stringer and Others;
• C-277/08, Pereda; • C-282/10, Dominguez; • C-78/11, ANGELD;• C-194/12, Maestre
Garzia
• prohibiton of replacing the minimum period of paid annual leave by allowance in lieu
• C-124/05, Federatie Nederlandse Vakbeweging
Art. 7 WTD before the Art. 7 WTD before the CJEUCJEU
5Faculty of Law University of Zagreb
Art. 7 of WTD before the Art. 7 of WTD before the CJEUCJEU• allowance in lieu,
instead of paid annual leave – when the employment relationship is terminated
• C-350/06, 520/06 Joined cases Schultz-Hoff and Stringer and Others,
• C-337/10, Neidel
• (prohibition) of rolled-up holiday pay
• C-131/04, Robinson-Steele• C-257/04, Clarke
• the carrying-over of unused annual leave to the next calendar year
• C-350/06, 520/06 Joined cases Schultz-Hoff and Stringer and Others
• C-214/10, KHS • C-337/10, Neidel
• the right to paid annual leave for part-time and/or fixed- time workers
• C-486/08, Tirols• C-229 and 230/11,
Heimanni Toltschin• C-415/12, Brandes
Faculty of Law University of Zagreb 6
Research questions Research questions
Croatian law examined under EU law:
1.Is the minimum period of employment a precondition for the entitlement to paid annual leave?
2.Can the right to paid annual leave be lost due to overlap with another period of leave?
3.Are the carry – over periods in Croatian law long enough?
Faculty of Law University of Zagreb 7
1. 1. Minimum period of Minimum period of employment as a employment as a
precondition for the precondition for the entitlement to paid annual entitlement to paid annual
leaveleave
Faculty of Law University of Zagreb 8
EU perspectiveEU perspectiveBECTUBECTU
◦ the entitlement to paid annual leave didn't arise until a worker had been continuously
employed for 13 weeks
◦ „the entitlement of every worker to paid annual leave must be regarded as a
particularly important principle of Community social law” (para. 43) no derogation
implementation by the competent national authorities must be confined within the limits expressly laid down
by the WTD
◦ competence of the MS? difference between the arrangement and the entitlement for paid annual leave,
o MS are not allowed to „adopt national rules under which a worker doesn't begin to accrue rights to paid annual leave until he has completed a minimum period“ of employment (para. 53)
Faculty of Law University of Zagreb
9
Croatian perspectiveCroatian perspectiveThe right to paid annual leave in its full duration (4
weeks)
◦ after six months of employment (Art. 58 (1) LA)
Employees who don’t meet this condition have the right to a proportion of annual leave (Art. 59 LA)
◦ the right to one-twelfth of (full) annual leave for each
month of work
◦ when calculating the duration of annual leave, at least half
a day of annual leave is rounded up to a whole day of
annual leave, and at least half a month of work is rounded
up to a whole month
Faculty of Law University of Zagreb1
0
EXAMPLE:•The worker was employed 1.7. – 18.8., 5 days/week (Mon-Fri); 8 h/day
• the worker worked more than half of August – to be rounded up to a whole month
•duration of the employment relationship (for the purpose of calculating AL)? 2 months•duration of paid annual leave? 2/12 x 20 days (4 weeks; 5 working days per week) = 3, 333 days= 3 days
• 0,333 days is less than half a day – will not be rounded up to a whole day
(In)co(In)commpatibility with the EU patibility with the EU law?law?status of a worker whose employment
relationship with an employer lasted for less than half a month?
◦ does relevant Croatian legislation implicate that a
worker has to be in an employment relationship for at
least half a month in order to begin to accrue the right
to paid annual leave?
◦ is this compatible with EU law (BECTU case)?
◦ is a worker entitled to paid annual leave - the problem of
calculation of (the duration of) annual leave?
de lege ferenda suggestions?
Faculty of Law University of Zagreb 1
1
II II Relationship between paid Relationship between paid annual leave and other annual leave and other periods of leaveperiods of leave
- granted by EU law- granted by EU law- not granted by EU law- not granted by EU law
Faculty of Law University of Zagreb 12
EU perspective – maternity EU perspective – maternity leaveleave Merino Gómez Merino Gómez
the maternity leave coincided with the period of annual leave envisaged
by the collective agreement which resulted in the refusal of annual leave
The CJEU examined the purpose of the entitlement to annual leave
concluding that it „is different from that of the entitlement to maternity
leave. Maternity leave is intended, first, to protect a woman’s biological
condition during and after pregnancy and, second, to protect the special
relationship between a woman and her child over the period which
follows pregnancy and childbirth “ (para. 32)
„a worker must be able to take her annual leave during a period
other than the period of her maternity leave“ (para. 37)
Faculty of Law University of Zagreb 1
3
Croatian perspectiveCroatian perspective the LA contains only a very broad provision on periods which shall
not „interfere“ with the duration of paid annual leave (Article 56(1))
◦ “holidays and non-working days established by law are not included in the duration of annual leave” and
◦ “a period of temporary inability to work, which was confirmed by an authorised physician, is not included in the duration of annual leave”
◦ ◦ due to traditional (paternalistic, even dicriminatory) approach, maternity leave is still
considerd to be „temporary inability to work” (monetary) maternal benefits still managed by the Croatian Health Insurance Fund
Maternity leave explicitly mentioned only in Art 63(3) LA which provides more favourable regulation for the carrying over of not taken or interrupted annual leave to the following calendar year, for workers who were unable to exercise it due to “illness or maternity,
parental or adoption leave”
◦ confirms that maternity leave is not to be included in the duration of annual leave
◦ the same solution proscribed regarding parental and adoption leave (although the Art. 56. of the LA doesn’t provide for any ground for such interpretation)
14
EU perspective – sick leaveEU perspective – sick leave Schultz-Hoff and StringerSchultz-Hoff and Stringer
◦ long-term sick leave followed by dismissal
„it is common ground that the purpose of the entitlement to paid annual leave is to enable the worker to rest and to enjoy a period of relaxation and leisure,
the purpose of the entitlement to sick leave is different. It is given to the worker so that he can recover from being ill“ (para. 25)
„the right to sick leave and conditions for exercise of that right are not, as [EU] law now stands, governed by that law“ (para. 27)
nevertheless:
the WTD precludes „national legislation or practices which provide that the right to paid annual leave is extinguished at the end of the leave year and/or of a carry-over period, which was the reason why the applicant could not exercise his right to paid annual leave (para. 49)
Faculty of Law University of Zagreb 15
EU perspective (II)EU perspective (II)
• C-277/08, Pereda;
• C-194/12, Maestre Garzia
• C-78/11, ANGELD
Faculty of Law University of Zagreb 1
6
• a worker becoming unfit for work before the date of his allocated annual leave
• a worker becoming unfit for work during a period of paid annual leave
• a worker has to subsequently be entitled to annual leave which has not been used
Croatian perspectiveCroatian perspective
a period of temporary inability to work, which was confirmed by an authorised physician, is not included in the duration of annual leave (Art 56(3) LA)
Faculty of Law University of Zagreb 1
7
(In)compatibility with EU (In)compatibility with EU law?law?other types of leave recognised by Croatian law
Paid:◦ for important personal needs (Art 65(1) LA) ;
◦ when receiving education for the needs of the works council or trade union
work (Art 65(4) LA)
◦ after donating blood (Art 65(6) LA)
for the purpose of acquiring the rights arising from employment or
related to employment, considered as time spent at work (Art 65(5) LA)
Unpaid:◦ the employer may grant a worker unpaid leave, at his or her request (Art 66
LA)
◦ Maternity and Parental Benefits Act (Art 9(1.9)) - the right to suspension of the
employment relationship until the child turns three years of age
the rights and obligations arising from employment or related to
employment are suspended (unless otherwise specified by the law) (Art 66(2) LA)
Faculty of Law University of Zagreb 1
8
III Carrying-over of the III Carrying-over of the unused unused annual leave to the annual leave to the
next calendar yearnext calendar year
Faculty of Law University of Zagreb 19
EU perspectiveEU perspective Federatie Nederlandse VakbewegingFederatie Nederlandse Vakbeweging
◦ an information brochure - a worker can obtain cash in exchange for the leave days above the mandatory minimum number of days per year, or days which have been saved up over the course of previous years
◦ „the positive effect which that leave has for the safety and
health of the worker is deployed fully if it is taken in the year
prescribed for that purpose, namely the current year
◦ the significance of that rest period in that regard remains if it is
taken during a later period“ (para. 30)
Faculty of Law University of Zagreb 2
0
EU perspective (II)EU perspective (II) Schultz-Hoff and StringerSchultz-Hoff and Stringer a provision of national law regarding the carry-over period aims to
give a worker who has been prevented from taking his annual leave an additional opportunity to benefit from that leave
◦ as such, those provisions form part of the conditions for the exercise and
implementation of the right to paid annual leave - MS competence (para. 42)
„it must be held that national law can provide for the loss of the worker’s right to paid annual leave guaranteed by Art 7(1) WTD at the end of the leave year and/or of a carry-over period, but only if the worker actually had the opportunity to exercise the right conferred on him” (para. 42)
Faculty of Law University of Zagreb 21
EU perspective (III)EU perspective (III) KHSKHS Due to incapacity, Mr. Schulte wasn't able to exercise his right to annual leave; in
2009 he brought an action for payment of allowances in lieu of annual leave not
taken during the reference periods corresponding to the calendar years 2006, 2007
and 2008
although the previous case-law indicates that a worker’s right to paid annual leave
shouldn’t lapse without him actually having had the opportunity to exercise
that right, „that conclusion must none the less be qualified in specific circumstances
such as those in the main proceedings“ (para. 28)
it can lapse, but the carry-over period must be „substantially longer than the
reference period in respect of which it is granted” (para. 40)
Reference period = leave year = calendar year
15 months?
NeidelNeidel – 9 months?
Faculty of Law University of Zagreb 22
Croatian perspective Croatian perspective Art. 63 (1) LA two weeks of annual leave may be carried over to the next
calendar year, only when an employer does not provide a worker with an opportunity to use such leave
carried over annual leave must be used no later than the 30th of June of the following year
Exceptions: in the cases of illness, maternity, parental or adoption leave – the
entire annual leave can be carried over, but it must be used by 30 June of the following year
Ship workers, posted workers and workers performing citizen duties in defence service – entitlement to use the entire annual leave in the following calendar year
Faculty of Law University of Zagreb2
3
(In)compatibility with EU (In)compatibility with EU law?law?reference period in Croatia is 6 months
◦ only by way of exception, some categories of workers are entitled to a longer carry-over period (12 months)
CJEU - the carry-over period has to be substantially longer than the granted reference period
Faculty of Law University of Zagreb 2
4
First conclusions: Croatian First conclusions: Croatian law is incompatible with EU law is incompatible with EU lawlawDominguez
1. national law must be interpreted in conformity with
EU law
limited by the prohibition of interpreting national law contra legem
2. direct effect of directives
Is conforminterpretationpossible?
Faculty of Law University of Zagreb 2
5
• employer is a state body • vertical – YES• national courts should
disregard any conflicting national provisions
• employer is a private entity• horizontal - NO• compensation for the loss
Thank you for Thank you for your your attentionattention
Faculty of Law University of Zagreb 26