The retrieval of the LWC in water clouds: the comparison of Frisch and Radar-Lidar techniques O. A....
-
Upload
marshall-cameron -
Category
Documents
-
view
219 -
download
1
Transcript of The retrieval of the LWC in water clouds: the comparison of Frisch and Radar-Lidar techniques O. A....
![Page 1: The retrieval of the LWC in water clouds: the comparison of Frisch and Radar-Lidar techniques O. A. Krasnov and H. W. J. Russchenberg International Research.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062713/56649f4c5503460f94c6d06f/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
The retrieval of the LWC in water clouds:the comparison of Frisch and Radar-Lidar
techniques
O. A. Krasnov and H. W. J. Russchenberg
International Research Centre for Telecommunications-transmission and Radar,
Faculty of Information Technology and Systems, Delft University of Technology,
Mekelweg 4, 2628 CD Delft, The Netherlands.
Ph. +31 15 2787544, Fax: +31 15 2784046
E-mail: [email protected], : [email protected]
Third Progress Meeting24-25 April 2003 , Reading
![Page 2: The retrieval of the LWC in water clouds: the comparison of Frisch and Radar-Lidar techniques O. A. Krasnov and H. W. J. Russchenberg International Research.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062713/56649f4c5503460f94c6d06f/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
The Radar, Lidar, and Radiometer datasetfrom the Baltex Bridge Cloud (BBC) campaign
August 1- September 30, 2001, Cabauw, NL
• Radar Reflectivity from the 95 GHz Radar MIRACLE (GKSS)
• Lidar Backscattering Coefficient from the CT75K Lidar Ceilometer (KNMI)
• Liquid Water Path from the 22 channel MICCY (UBonn)
All data were presented in equal time-height grid with time interval 30 sec and height interval 30 m.
![Page 3: The retrieval of the LWC in water clouds: the comparison of Frisch and Radar-Lidar techniques O. A. Krasnov and H. W. J. Russchenberg International Research.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062713/56649f4c5503460f94c6d06f/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
The relation between “in-situ” Effective Radius and Radar Reflectivity to Lidar Extinction Ratio
for different field campaigns.
The relation between “in-situ” Effective Radius and Radar Reflectivity to Lidar Extinction Ratio
for different field campaigns.
![Page 4: The retrieval of the LWC in water clouds: the comparison of Frisch and Radar-Lidar techniques O. A. Krasnov and H. W. J. Russchenberg International Research.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062713/56649f4c5503460f94c6d06f/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Application of the relation for the identification
of the Z-LWC relationship
Application of the relation for the identification
of the Z-LWC relationship
effrZ /
![Page 5: The retrieval of the LWC in water clouds: the comparison of Frisch and Radar-Lidar techniques O. A. Krasnov and H. W. J. Russchenberg International Research.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062713/56649f4c5503460f94c6d06f/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Case study: August 28, 2001, Cabauw, NL, 10.12-11.20 The profiles of measured variables
![Page 6: The retrieval of the LWC in water clouds: the comparison of Frisch and Radar-Lidar techniques O. A. Krasnov and H. W. J. Russchenberg International Research.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062713/56649f4c5503460f94c6d06f/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Case study: August 28, 2001, Cabauw, NL, 10.12-11.20 The profiles of Optical Extinction and Radar-Lidar Ratio
![Page 7: The retrieval of the LWC in water clouds: the comparison of Frisch and Radar-Lidar techniques O. A. Krasnov and H. W. J. Russchenberg International Research.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062713/56649f4c5503460f94c6d06f/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Case study: August 28, 2001, Cabauw, NL, 10.12-11.20 The Resulting Classification Map (radar and lidar data)
![Page 8: The retrieval of the LWC in water clouds: the comparison of Frisch and Radar-Lidar techniques O. A. Krasnov and H. W. J. Russchenberg International Research.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062713/56649f4c5503460f94c6d06f/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Case study: August 28, 2001, Cabauw, NL, 10.12-11.20 Retrieval Results (classification using radar and lidar data)
![Page 9: The retrieval of the LWC in water clouds: the comparison of Frisch and Radar-Lidar techniques O. A. Krasnov and H. W. J. Russchenberg International Research.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062713/56649f4c5503460f94c6d06f/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Frisch’s algorithmFrisch’s algorithm
2
log0, LWCNaZ
effr
• log-normal drop size distribution
• concentration and distribution width are constant in the cloud
max
0
2/1
2/1
)(
)()(
h
h
RMMW
hZ
hZ
h
LWPhLWC
From radiometer’s LWP and radar reflectivity profile:
![Page 10: The retrieval of the LWC in water clouds: the comparison of Frisch and Radar-Lidar techniques O. A. Krasnov and H. W. J. Russchenberg International Research.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062713/56649f4c5503460f94c6d06f/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Case study: August 28, 2001, Cabauw, NL, 10.12-11.20 Retrieval Results for Frisch’s algorithm
![Page 11: The retrieval of the LWC in water clouds: the comparison of Frisch and Radar-Lidar techniques O. A. Krasnov and H. W. J. Russchenberg International Research.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062713/56649f4c5503460f94c6d06f/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Case study: August 28, 2001, Cabauw, NL, 10.12-11.20 Histogram of Differences in Retrieval Results for
the Frisch’s and the Radar-Lidar algorithm
![Page 12: The retrieval of the LWC in water clouds: the comparison of Frisch and Radar-Lidar techniques O. A. Krasnov and H. W. J. Russchenberg International Research.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062713/56649f4c5503460f94c6d06f/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Difference between LWC that retrieved using Frisch method and retrieved from radar-to-lidar ratio
![Page 13: The retrieval of the LWC in water clouds: the comparison of Frisch and Radar-Lidar techniques O. A. Krasnov and H. W. J. Russchenberg International Research.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062713/56649f4c5503460f94c6d06f/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Frisch’s fittings
Log-Normal DSDN=1000 - 2000 cm-3, = 0.8N=1000 - 2000 cm-3, = 0.1
Case study: August 28, 2001, Cabauw, NL, 10.12-11.20 Representation results on the Z-LWC plane
![Page 14: The retrieval of the LWC in water clouds: the comparison of Frisch and Radar-Lidar techniques O. A. Krasnov and H. W. J. Russchenberg International Research.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062713/56649f4c5503460f94c6d06f/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Case: cloud without drizzle
![Page 15: The retrieval of the LWC in water clouds: the comparison of Frisch and Radar-Lidar techniques O. A. Krasnov and H. W. J. Russchenberg International Research.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062713/56649f4c5503460f94c6d06f/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Case study: September 23, 2001, Cabauw, NL, 8.00-10.00 The profiles of measured variables
![Page 16: The retrieval of the LWC in water clouds: the comparison of Frisch and Radar-Lidar techniques O. A. Krasnov and H. W. J. Russchenberg International Research.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062713/56649f4c5503460f94c6d06f/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Case study: September 23, 2001, Cabauw, NL, 8.00-10.00 The profiles of measured variables
![Page 17: The retrieval of the LWC in water clouds: the comparison of Frisch and Radar-Lidar techniques O. A. Krasnov and H. W. J. Russchenberg International Research.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062713/56649f4c5503460f94c6d06f/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Case study: September 23, 2001, Cabauw, NL, 8.00-10.00 The profiles of optical extinction and Radar-Liadr Ratio
![Page 18: The retrieval of the LWC in water clouds: the comparison of Frisch and Radar-Lidar techniques O. A. Krasnov and H. W. J. Russchenberg International Research.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062713/56649f4c5503460f94c6d06f/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Case study: September 23, 2001, Cabauw, NL, 8.00-10.00 The Classification Map (Radar-Lidar, threshold -35 and -25 dB)
![Page 19: The retrieval of the LWC in water clouds: the comparison of Frisch and Radar-Lidar techniques O. A. Krasnov and H. W. J. Russchenberg International Research.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062713/56649f4c5503460f94c6d06f/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Case study: September 23, 2001, Cabauw, NL, 8.00-10.00 The Resulting Classification Map (radar and lidar data)
![Page 20: The retrieval of the LWC in water clouds: the comparison of Frisch and Radar-Lidar techniques O. A. Krasnov and H. W. J. Russchenberg International Research.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062713/56649f4c5503460f94c6d06f/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Atlas Z-LWC relationshipAtlas Z-LWC relationship
![Page 21: The retrieval of the LWC in water clouds: the comparison of Frisch and Radar-Lidar techniques O. A. Krasnov and H. W. J. Russchenberg International Research.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062713/56649f4c5503460f94c6d06f/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Frisch’s fittings
Case study: September 23, 2001, Cabauw, NL, 8.00-10.00 The results of Frisch’s algorithm application
Log-Normal DSDN=1000 - 2000 cm-3, = 0.8N=1000 - 2000 cm-3, = 0.1
![Page 22: The retrieval of the LWC in water clouds: the comparison of Frisch and Radar-Lidar techniques O. A. Krasnov and H. W. J. Russchenberg International Research.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062713/56649f4c5503460f94c6d06f/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Conclusions
•The Frisch’s technique produce much more water
•It does not recognize the presence of in-cloud drizzle
•For the log-normal model Frisch’s fitting of Z-LWC relationships shows huge, non-realistic concentrations