The Really Big Game Changer: Crude Oil Production …...Crude Oil and Natural Gas Prices Center for...
Transcript of The Really Big Game Changer: Crude Oil Production …...Crude Oil and Natural Gas Prices Center for...
David E. Dismukes, Ph.D.
Center for Energy Studies
Louisiana State University
The Really Big Game Changer: Crude Oil
Production from Shale Resources and the
Tuscaloosa Marine Shale
Baton Rouge Chamber of Commerce
Regional Stakeholders Breakfast
June 27, 2012
Center for Energy Studies
Energy-Related
Carbon Dioxide
81.2%
Summary and Take Away
2
• New natural gas supply availability is having considerable
impacts on all energy markets today and on longer term,
forward-looking basis.
• Shale revolution is now migrating into liquids and crude oil
production. Facilitating additional natural gas production
despite low prices.
• Considerable economic development opportunities.
• Early in the process, considerable uncertainties, considerable
risks, difficult to attain information, play understandings still
very preliminary – policy need to manage expectations despite
the (justified) excitement.
Center for Energy Studies
© LSU Center for Energy Studies
Introduction
Center for Energy Studies
Reminder – The Way Things Were
3 © LSU Center for Energy Studies
2.50
3.00
3.50
4.00
4.50
5.00
5.50
6.00
2004 2008 2012 2016 2020 2024 2028
Onshore (Lower 48) Offshore (Lower 48)
Mill
ion
Ba
rre
ls p
er
da
y
Relatively uninspiring U.S. crude oil production forecast.
Source: USDOE/EIA, Annual Energy Outlook, 2006 © LSU Center for Energy Studies
Long Term US Crude Oil Production Forecast (2006)
Center for Energy Studies Historic Trends
2.5
4.5
6.5
8.5
10.5
12.5
14.5
16.5
18.5
20.5
2004 2008 2012 2016 2020 2024 2028
Onshore (Lower 48) Offshore (Lower 48)
Trilli
on
cu
bic
fe
et
Natural gas production forecasted to decrease starting in 2016.
Source: USDOE/EIA, Annual Energy Outlook, 2006 © LSU Center for Energy Studies
Long Term US Natural Gas Production Forecast (2006)
Center for Energy Studies Historic Trends
Crude Oil and Natural Gas Prices
Center for Energy Studies Historic Trends
$0
$2
$4
$6
$8
$10
$12
$14
$16
$0
$20
$40
$60
$80
$100
$120
$140
$160
Jan-99 Jan-00 Jan-01 Jan-02 Jan-03 Jan-04 Jan-05 Jan-06 Jan-07 Jan-08
Crude Oil (WTI) Natural Gas (Henry Hub)
Source: Federal Reserve Bank
Cru
de
Oil
($/B
bl) N
atu
ral G
as ($
/Mcf)
Prices reflected the state of, and outlook for, energy markets.
6 © LSU Center for Energy Studies
First energy price crisis
Recession
0
200
400
600
800
1,000
1,200
1,400
1,600
1,800
2,000
Dec-9
6
Jun-9
7
Dec-9
7
Jun-9
8
Dec-9
8
Jun-9
9
Dec-9
9
Jun-0
0
Dec-0
0
Jun-0
1
Dec-0
1
Jun-0
2
Dec-0
2
Jun-0
3
Dec-0
3
Jun-0
4
Dec-0
4
Jun-0
5
Dec-0
5
Jun-0
6
Dec-0
6
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
Rig Count
Production
Source: Energy Information Administration, Department of Energy; and Baker-Hughes Inc.
3 percent increase
in production
(Aug-99 to Sep-01)
131 percent
increase in rigs
(Apr-02 to Aug-06)
Num
ber
of O
pera
ting R
igs
12-M
onth
Movin
g A
vera
ge (
Bcf/
d)
158 percent
increase in rigs
(Apr-99 to Jul-01)
4 percent
decrease in production
(Feb-04 to Aug-06)
The maturing nature of US basins reflected in drilling productivity.
Historic Monthly Rig Counts and Gas Production (1997-2006)
Center for Energy Studies Historic Trends
Source: Natural Gas: Can We Produce Enough?” Independent Petroleum Association of America,
website: http://www.ipaa.org/govtrelations/factsheets/NaturalGasProdEnough.asp.
ANWR = 3.5 TCF
ANS = 35 TCF
Policy advocacy focused on restricted areas as a potential solution to
the resource constraint problem.
Resource Estimates: Restricted Areas (Percent Restricted)
Center for Energy Studies Historic Trends
Source: National Petroleum Council
LNG provides 14% of the U.S. supply of natural gas by 2025.
© LSU Center for Energy Studies
NPC Forecast North American Supply Disposition
Center for Energy Studies Historic Trends
Center for Energy Studies
What Changed? The Way Things Are
1
0 © LSU Center for Energy Studies
Unconventional vs. Conventional Geological Formations
Center for Energy Studies
1
1 © LSU Center for Energy Studies
Recent Trends
Source: Energy Tomorrow
Center for Energy Studies
Shale, Horizontal Drilling, and Fractionation
• Shale (unconventional) wells
differ from “conventional” wells
since they are drilled horizontally
and not vertically.
• Horizontal segments are then
“fractured” with higher pressure
water, chemicals and silica to
break up the formation.
• The fractionation process
releases/liberates the
hydrocarbons.
• Some environmental and water
use concerns expressed in some
areas of the country on this
drilling process.
Recent Trends
Center for Energy Studies
Production from a Typical Well and Shale Well
13 © LSU Center for Energy Studies
Recent Trends
Illustrative production decline from a
convention vs. shale producing well. As
much as 80 percent of total production
thought to occur in the first two to three
years.
Source: Energy Information Administration, U.S. Department of Energy
Domestic Shale Gas Basins and Plays
Center for Energy Studies
1
4 © LSU Center for Energy Studies
Unlike
conventional
resources,
shale plays
(natural gas,
liquids, and
crudes) are
located
almost
ubiquitously
throughout
the U.S. and
are the
primary
reason for
the decrease
in overall and
regional
natural gas
prices.
Recent Trends
Center for Energy Studies
Game Changer 1: Natural Gas
1
5 © LSU Center for Energy Studies
$/M
cf
Source: Energy Information Administration, U.S. Department of Energy.
Natural Gas Price Variability
Center for Energy Studies
$0
$2
$4
$6
$8
$10
$12
$14
$16
$18
$20
Jan-97 Jan-99 Jan-01 Jan-03 Jan-05 Jan-07 Jan-09 Jan-11
average for period
2000-2001 heating season
through 2008: $6.24 (standard deviation: $2.39)
since 2009: $4.11 (standard deviation: $0.70)
1
6 © LSU Center for Energy Studies
The 2001 to 2009 market trend of higher average prices coupled with high
volatility is reversing itself and post 2009 prices are significantly lower.
Average 1997
through 2000: $2.79 (standard deviation: $1.28)
Natural Gas Trends
Dry
Na
tura
l G
as P
rove
d R
ese
rve
s (
Tcf)
Source: Energy Information Administration, U.S. Department of Energy
Natural Gas Proved Reserves and Production
Center for Energy Studies
-
5
10
15
20
25
30
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010
Reserves
Production
Ma
rke
ted P
rod
uctio
n (T
cf)
1
7 © LSU Center for Energy Studies
Current U.S. natural gas reserves are approaching record levels not seen
since 1970. Natural gas production is at levels that surpass historic peaks.
Natural Gas Trends
Imp
ort
s -
Bcf
Source: Energy Information Administration, U.S. Department of Energy
Natural Gas Imports
Center for Energy Studies P
erc
en
t of T
ota
l U.S
. Su
pp
ly - %
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
0
500
1,000
1,500
2,000
2,500
3,000
3,500
4,000
4,500
5,000
1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010
LNG Imports Pipeline Imports Imports as a Percent of Total Supply
18 © LSU Center for Energy Studies
Natural gas imports, once thought the be the supply remedy for meeting
future gas needs are falling to levels also not seen since the 1990s.
Natural Gas Trends
Re
se
rve
s -
Tcf
Source: Energy Information Administration, U.S. Department of Energy
Annual Energy Outlook, Natural Gas Reserves
Center for Energy Studies
200
220
240
260
280
300
320
2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035
19 © LSU Center for Energy Studies
Unconventional resources are not a “flash in the pan” and are anticipated to
continue to increase over the next two decades or more.
Natural Gas Trends
Basin Competition
Center for Energy Studies
Source: MIT Energy Initiative. 20 © LSU Center for Energy Studies
China
1,275 Tcf
Australia
396 Tcf
South
Africa
485 Tcf
Argentina
774 Tcf
Brazil
226 Tcf
Mexico
681 Tcf
Canada
388 Tcf
U.S.
862 Tcf
France
180 Tcf
Poland
187 Tcf
Algeria
231 Tcf
Libya
290 Tcf
Close to 6,000 TCF of shale gas opportunities around the world. Coupled with 9,000 Tcf
in conventional suggest a potentially solid resource base for many decades.
Natural Gas Trends
Center for Energy Studies
Forecast U.S. natural gas production, 1990-2035
21 © LSU Center for Energy Studies
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035
Shale gas Tight gas Non-associated offshoreAlaska Coalbed methane Associated with oilNon-associated onshore
Tcf
Shale availability will drive U.S. natural gas supply.
Shale Gas Production
Assc. Gas Production
(20
10
$/M
MB
TU
)
Source: Energy Information Administration, U.S. Department of Energy
Choosing Most Current Natural Gas Price Forecasts: AEO-2007 to AEO-2012
Center for Energy Studies
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
1997 2002 2007 2012 2017 2022 2027 2032
Actual Henry Hub AEO-2007 AEO-2008 AEO-2009
AEO-2010 AEO-2011 AEO-2012
22 © LSU Center for Energy Studies
Shale availability has significant impact on future price outlook.
Anticipated price outlook in 2009.
Anticipated price outlook today.
Natural Gas Trends
Center for Energy Studies
Game Changer 2: Crude and Liquids
2
3 © LSU Center for Energy Studies
Crude Oil and Natural Gas Prices
Center for Energy Studies Crude Oil Trends
$0
$2
$4
$6
$8
$10
$12
$14
$16
$0
$20
$40
$60
$80
$100
$120
$140
$160
Jan-99 Jan-01 Jan-03 Jan-05 Jan-07 Jan-09 Jan-11
Crude Oil (WTI) Natural Gas (Henry Hub)
Source: Federal Reserve Bank
Cru
de
Oil
($/B
bl)
Na
tura
l Ga
s ($
/Mcf)
Two significant breaks (decoupling) of natural gas and crude oil prices.
24 © LSU Center for Energy Studies
First price
decoupling: Gas
Up, Crude Down
Second price
decoupling: Crude
Up, Gas Down
Recession
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
200
0
500
1,000
1,500
2,000
2,500
2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010
Onshore Offshore
Center for Energy Studies
Domestic Rig Counts – Onshore vs. Offshore
25
U.S
. O
nsh
ore
Rig
Co
un
t
Source: Baker Hughes.
U.S
. Offs
ho
re R
ig C
ou
nt
Deepwater Horizon
Spill
Onshore rig counts are moving close to their pre-recession levels,
primarily motivated by increased crude oil drilling, not natural gas.
Crude Oil Trends
Center for Energy Studies
26
Domestic Rig Count – Crude Oil vs. Natural Gas
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Jul-87 Jul-90 Jul-93 Jul-96 Jul-99 Jul-02 Jul-05 Jul-08 Jul-11
Pe
rce
nt o
f To
tal R
igs
Source: Baker Hughes.
Oil Rigs
Gas Rigs
For the first time in 16 years, the number of oil rigs is
equivalent to gas rigs.
Crude Oil Trends
Rig Count and Crude Oil Price, (Each State Measured Relative to 1999 Activity)
Center for Energy Studies
$0
$2
$4
$6
$8
$10
$12
$14
0
200
400
600
800
1,000
1,200
1,400
Jan-07 Jul-07 Jan-08 Jul-08 Jan-09 Jul-09 Jan-10 Jul-10 Jan-11
N. Louisiana Texas Pennsylvania
New Mexico Oklahoma Wyoming
Colorado Natural Gas Price
Source: Baker Hughes; and Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis.
Rig
Co
un
t (J
an
ua
ry 1
99
9 =
10
0)
He
nry
Hu
b ($
/Mcf)
27 © LSU Center for Energy Studies
Drilling rig activity increasing rapidly in liquids rich shale.
Crude Oil Trends
Center for Energy Studies
Rig Count, North Louisiana (Haynesville) and Texas District 1 (Eagle Ford)
28 © LSU Center for Energy Studies
$0
$10
$20
$30
$40
$50
$60
$70
$80
$90
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
1,000
Jan-09 Apr-09 Jul-09 Oct-09 Jan-10 Apr-10 Jul-10 Oct-10 Jan-11 Apr-11
North Louisiana Texas - District 1 Spot Price Differential
Rig
Co
un
t (J
an
ua
ry 2
00
9=
10
0)
$/B
OE
Indexing the rig change from January 2009 highlights the basin preference.
Haynesville is losing its
competitive advantage due to the
liquids preference associated
with other shales.
Source: Baker Hughes. Rig counts are indexed to the level of active drilling rigs in each reported area as of January 2009.
Crude Oil Trends
Center for Energy Studies
2
9 © LSU Center for Energy Studies
Can you insert a slide that shows a
Crude Oil Trends
Annual Production, Unconventional Resources
Center for Energy Studies
30 © LSU Center for Energy Studies
Bcf/d MMBBl/d
Source: Advanced Resource Intl; presentation to Cheniere Board, March 2011; Cheniere Research
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
2010 2011E 2012E 2013E 2014E 2015E 2020E
0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
Includes Eagle Ford, W. Barnett, Bakken Shales;
Granite Wash, Piceance & Uinta Tight Sands
Liquids
Gas
Liquids production from shale plays > 3 million barrels per day by 2020
Associated natural gas > 7 Bcf/d of “costless” supply (or about 2.3 Bcf/d per
every 1.0 MMBbls/d of shale-based liquids production).
Crude Oil Trends
Center for Energy Studies
Closer to Home: Louisiana and the
Tuscaloosa Marine Shale (“TMS”)
3
1 © LSU Center for Energy Studies
Center for Energy Studies
Crude Oil Shale Opportunities -- Louisiana
32 © LSU Center for Energy Studies Source: Oil and Gas Journal and Louisiana Geological Survey.
• 1998 LGS Study primary
publicly-available source of
information on the formation.
• Lies between sands of the
upper and lower Tuscaloosa.
• Approximately 2.7 MM acres.
• Varies in thickness from 500
feet (MS) to around 800 feet
(LA).
• Shallowest opportunity
around 10,000 feet – mostly
between 11,000 to 12,000 –
some areas as deep as
16,000 (EBR).
• Estimated potential resource
of 7 BBbls.
Tuscaloosa Marine Shale
Center for Energy Studies
Cumulative TMS Wells Drilled
33 © LSU Center for Energy Studies Source: Amelia Resources.
Tuscaloosa Marine Shale
Approximately 13 wells drilled to date.
Production Decline Curve Differences
Center for Energy Studies
3
4 © LSU Center for Energy Studies
Tuscaloosa Marine Shale
• Recently-drilled
wells located
primarily in
southwestern MS
and in the Florida
parishes.
Center for Energy Studies
Tuscaloosa Marine Shale Wells
35 © LSU Center for Energy Studies Source: Amelia Resources.
Tuscaloosa Marine Shale
Center for Energy Studies
Tuscaloosa Trend Scout Report, Score Card
36 © LSU Center for Energy Studies Source: Amelia Resources.
Tuscaloosa Marine Shale
Center for Energy Studies
TMS Daily Oil Production
37 © LSU Center for Energy Studies Source: Amelia Resources.
Tuscaloosa Marine Shale
Initial production (“IP”) rates important, but only one of several statistics that
should be reviewed given typical production characteristics and uncertainty.
Center for Energy Studies
The Early Days, Eagle Ford Shale
38 © LSU Center for Energy Studies Source: Amelia Resources.
Tuscaloosa Marine Shale
Center for Energy Studies
United States Employment (2005 = 100)
39 © LSU Center for Energy Studies
90
100
110
120
130
140
150
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
Em
plo
ym
en
t (2
00
5 =
10
0)
Oil and gas employment
Total emplyoment
Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics
Tuscaloosa Marine Shale
Oil and gas employment is almost 40 percent above its 2005 level while total
U.S. employment struggles to regain four years of losses.
Center for Energy Studies
U.S./Shale Producing State Employment (2005 = 100)
40 © LSU Center for Energy Studies
94
96
98
100
102
104
106
108
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
Em
plo
ym
en
t (2
00
5 =
10
0)
States with major shale activity
Non-shale states
Shale states: LA, TX, AR, ND, UT, CO, & PA
Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics
Tuscaloosa Marine Shale
A comparison of total employment tells story beyond just oil and gas.
Recession not as severe; recovery more robust.
Center for Energy Studies
Conclusions
4
1 © LSU Center for Energy Studies
Center for Energy Studies
Conclusions
42 © LSU Center for Energy Studies
• Exceptional industry performance: employment up; reserves up;
production up; investment/capacity up; and exports up.
• Traditional sectors of energy industry have proven they are high
technology, high capital, and high growth – you’d have a hard time
figuring that out watching the nightly news.
• Policy and perception continue to be things that plague continued
industry development. It is hard to imagine the development and
innovation that could arise if the current policy uncertainty were
removed.
• Policy uncertainty is the biggest impediment to continued
development. Significant short-term policy retrenchment on
unconventional resources could lead to economic impacts that
would pale in comparison to past financial and housing crisis.
Conclusions
Center for Energy Studies
Questions, Comments and Discussion
43
www.enrg.lsu.edu