THE PUBLIC FINANCE DEBATES: “The New Zealand Government should sell 100% of its SOE stake, not...

7
THE PUBLIC FINANCE DEBATES: “The New Zealand Government should sell 100% of its SOE stake, not 49%” Proponent: Paul Dyer

Transcript of THE PUBLIC FINANCE DEBATES: “The New Zealand Government should sell 100% of its SOE stake, not...

Page 1: THE PUBLIC FINANCE DEBATES: “The New Zealand Government should sell 100% of its SOE stake, not 49%” Proponent: Paul Dyer.

THE PUBLIC FINANCE DEBATES:

“The New Zealand Government should sell 100% of its SOE stake, not 49%”

Proponent:

Paul Dyer

Page 2: THE PUBLIC FINANCE DEBATES: “The New Zealand Government should sell 100% of its SOE stake, not 49%” Proponent: Paul Dyer.

Outline

1. The NZ debate to date.

2. Why public vs private ownership matters.

3. How have NZ SOEs actually been

operating, and will anything change?

The VUW-GEN Public Finance Debates October 24, 2012

Page 3: THE PUBLIC FINANCE DEBATES: “The New Zealand Government should sell 100% of its SOE stake, not 49%” Proponent: Paul Dyer.

Growth of the Crown Balance Sheet

2003 2008 2012

Property, Plant & Equipment

52.7 103.3 108.6

Securities, Shares, Deposits and Derivative Gains

21.3 43.1 62.8

Other 25.9 54.4 68.9

TOTAL ASSETS 99.9 200.8 240.3

% GDP 74% 110% 116%

The VUW-GEN Public Finance Debates October 24, 2012

Source: Budget 2012 and FY2012 Financial Statements

Page 4: THE PUBLIC FINANCE DEBATES: “The New Zealand Government should sell 100% of its SOE stake, not 49%” Proponent: Paul Dyer.

NZ’s equity investment with the world is essentially

balancedAs at March, $bn 2011 2012EquityAssets 66 61Liabilities 62 66Net 4 -5

DebtAssets 117 111Liabilities 254 252Net -136 -140

NIIP -132 -146% GDP -68% -72%

The VUW-GEN Public Finance Debates October 24, 2012

Source: Statistics NZ, Balance of Payments, Table 11

Page 5: THE PUBLIC FINANCE DEBATES: “The New Zealand Government should sell 100% of its SOE stake, not 49%” Proponent: Paul Dyer.

Public v private ownership turns

on three questions:• Does competition matter more than

ownership?

• Are SOEs subject to welfare reducing

interventions?

• Are SOE governance problems intractable?

The VUW-GEN Public Finance Debates October 24, 2012

Mary M. Shirley and Patrick Walsh, “Public vs Private Ownership: The Current State of the Debate”, World Bank Research Paper 2420, Mar 2001.

Page 6: THE PUBLIC FINANCE DEBATES: “The New Zealand Government should sell 100% of its SOE stake, not 49%” Proponent: Paul Dyer.

Studies of operating efficiency, public vs private ownership

Issue Number of studies

Private performed better

No clear winner

SOE performed better

Comparing efficiency of private/privatised firms with SOEs

52 32 15 5

When comparing firms within the same industry

31 18 8 5

Comparing performance before and after privatisation

21 14 7 0

The VUW-GEN Public Finance Debates October 24, 2012

Mary M. Shirley and Patrick Walsh, “Public vs Private Ownership: The Current State of the Debate”, World Bank Research Paper 2420, Mar 2001.

Page 7: THE PUBLIC FINANCE DEBATES: “The New Zealand Government should sell 100% of its SOE stake, not 49%” Proponent: Paul Dyer.

How large are the gains?Measure % Change Significance

(Z scores)

Profitability Income/Sales +47% 3.15 ***3.16 ***3.92***

Efficiency Real sales / employee

+20% 3.66 ***4.79 ***4.87 ***

Investment Capex / Sales +36% 2.35 **2.28 **

0.80

Output Real Sales +83% 4.77 ***5.19 ***7.30 ***

Employment Total employees +1.2% 0.961.48-1.62

Dividends Divs / Sales +224% 4.63 ***4.37 ***4.98 ***

The VUW-GEN Public Finance Debates October 24, 2012

William Megginson and Jeffry Netter, “From State to Market: A survey of Empirical Studies of Privatisation””, J. Economic Literature, June 2001