The Present Gravitational W ave Detection Ef fort
Transcript of The Present Gravitational W ave Detection Ef fort
LIGO-G0900597-v1
Keith Riles
University of Michigan
LIGO Scientific Collaboration
International Conference
on Topics in Astroparticle
and Underground Physics
Rome – July 1, 2009
The Present
Gravitational Wave
Detection Effort
1
!"#$%#&'%(&#)*$#$*+,#-%!#)'./%
•! (&#)*$#$*+,#-%!#)'.%0%12*33-'.%*,%.3#4'5$*6'7%
•! 8'&$9&:#$*+,%3&+3#;#$*+,%.*6*-#&%$+%-*;"$%<+:'=.%.#6'%>#)'%'?9#$*+,@A%
–! !"#$%&%'(#)*+$,,-*.*/*
–! 01#*'"%)+2,"+,*$#3%"(4%'(#)+*5*67%-"7$#3%"8*****9**%)-**:**
2
Example:"
Ring of test masses"
responding to wave"
propagating along z"
Amplitude parameterized by (tiny) !
! dimensionless strain h: !L ~ h(t) x L!
!"=%-++B%C+&%(&#)*$#$*+,#-%2#D*#$*+,/%
•! ;,/%7+,*('<+*'=,",>*?$",+7@%A3BC*
•! 0,+'*D,),"%3*E,3%'(2('B8*–!F7%-"7$#3%"*"%-(%'(#)G*0"%2,3+*%'*+$,,-*#H*3(&='G*
–!I)(67,*$"#A,*#H*+'"#)&5H(,3-*&"%2('B*
•! D%()*-(HH,",)'*2(,1*#H*I)(2,"+,8*
–! J#7"/,+*/%))#'*A,*#A+/7",-*AB*-7+'*K*+',33%"*,)2,3#$,+*
–!L,',/'%A3,*+#7"/,+*+#@,*#H*'=,*@#+'*()',",+'()&M**
* 3,%+'*7)-,"+'##-*()*'=,*I)(2,"+,*
–!N$,)+*7$*,)'(",3B*),1*)#)5,3,/'"#@%&),'(/*+$,/'"7@*
3
!"#$%6*;"$%$"'%.B=%-++B%-*B'/%
4
!"#$%6#B'.%(&#)*$#$*+,#-%!#)'./%
•! E%-(%'(#)*&,),"%',-*AB*67%-"7$#3%"*@%++*@#2,@,)'+8*
*******?1('=*Iµ"*.*67%-"7$#3,*',)+#"M*"*.*+#7"/,*-(+'%)/,C*
•! O:%@$3,8*!%("*#H*PQR*S+#3%"*),7'"#)*+'%"+*()*/("/73%"*#"A('*#H*"%-(7+*TU*V@*?(@@(),)'*/#%3,+/,)/,C*%'*#"A('%3*H",67,)/B*RUU*W4*&(2,+*XUU*W4*"%-(%'(#)*#H*%@$3('7-,8*
5
Strong Indirect Evidence:
Binary Orbit Decay
Y,7'"#)*;()%"B*JB+',@*Z*W73+,*[*0%B3#"*
!JE*P\P]*9*P^**55*0(@()&*#H*$73+%"+*
6
•#
•#
17 / sec"
Neutron Binary System
•! separated by 106 miles •! m1 = 1.44m!; m2 = 1.39m!; $ = 0.617
Prediction from general relativity
•! spiral in by 3 mm/orbit
•! rate of change orbital period
~ 8 hr
Emission of gravitational waves
7
What makes Gravitational Waves?!
•! E+63#4$%:*,#&=%*,.3*&#-F% *!"#$%&'()
–! YJ5YJ*1%2,H#"@+*%",*1,33*-,+/"(A,-*–! E,/,)'*$"#&",++*#)*;W5;W*1%2,H#"@+****
•! G93'&,+)#'%H%(2I.F% * *!*+%','(**
–! A7"+'*+(&)%3+*()*/#()/(-,)/,*1('=*+(&)%3+*()*,3,/'"#@%&),'(/*"%-(%'(#)*K*),7'"()#+*
–! %335+VB*7)'"(&&,",-*+,%"/=,+*'##*
•! 89-.#&.%*,%+9&%;#-#J=F% *!&-%$./$"()
–! +,%"/=*H#"*#A+,"2,-*),7'"#)*+'%"+*****************–! %335+VB*+,%"/=*?/#@$7'()&*/=%33,)&,C*
•! E+.6+-+;*4#-%G*;,#-. ***!',."#0',$")*0"12%.+3/()
(&#)*$#$*+,#-%!#)'%K'$'4$*+,%
•! J7+$,)-,-*_)',"H,"#@,',"+*
–! J7+$,)-,-*@(""#"+*()*`H",,5H%33a*
–!S(/=,3+#)*_bN*(+**
* `)%'7"%3a*Dc*-,',/'#"*
–!;"#%-5A%)-*",+$#)+,*
****?dPU*W4*'#*H,1*VW4C*
–!c%2,H#"@*()H#"@%'(#)*
* ?,Q&QM*/=("$*",/#)+'"7/'(#)C*8
9
L"'%(-+:#-%M,$'&C'&+6'$'&%N'$>+&B%The three (two) LIGO, Virgo and GEO interferometers are part of a Global Network.
Multiple signal detections will increase detection confidence and provide better precision on
source locations and wave polarizations
LIGO GEO Virgo
TAMA
AIGO (proposed)
H1, H2
G1 L1
T1
V1
LIGO"
Livingston, Louisiana & Hanford,
Washington"
2 x 4000-m"
(1 x 2000-m)"
Completed 2-year data run at design sensitivity –
“enhancement” finishing"
VIRGO"
Near Pisa, Italy"1 x 3000-m"
Took ~4 months coincident data with LIGO –
approaching design sensitivity"
GEO"
Near Hannover, Germany" 1 x 600-m"
Took data during L-V downtime, about to
undergo upgrade"
TAMA"
Tokyo, Japan" 1 x 300-m"
Used for R&D aimed at future underground
detector"
10
S%e#"*_)',"H,"#@,',"+**1#"3-51(-,*
11
K#$#%29,. **
GO%&9,F**OP%D#=.%<Q9;%H%G'3$%RSSRA*Z*E#7&=*A7'*&##-*$"%/'(/,*
Have carried out a series of Engineering Runs (LIGO E1–E14, Virgo WSR 1-13) and
Science Runs (LIGO S1--S5, Virgo VSR1) interspersed with commissioning
S2 run: 59 days (Feb—April 2003) – Many good results
S3 run:
70 days (Oct 2003 – Jan 2004) -- Ragged
S4 run:
30 days (Feb—March 2005) – Another good run
S5 run: (VSR1 for Virgo)
23 months (Nov 2005 – Sept 2007) – At design sensitivity – focus of today
hrms = 3 10-22
f_DN*JP*!*Jg*J,)+('(2('(,+*
12
Strain
spectral noise density
13
Virgo Sensitivities
Black measurements – VSR1 – 2007
Red measurements – May 2009
Design !
Much better sensitivity than
LIGO below ~40 Hz !! Binary black holes
!! “Young” pulsars, e.g., Vela
J,%"/=()&*H#"*D"%2('B*c%2,+*
14
Binary Inspirals Continuous
waves
(NS-NS, NS-BH, BH-BH) (Spinning
NS)
Bursts Stochastic background
(Supernovae, “mergers”) (Cosmological,
astrophysical)
Long-Lived Short-Lived
Known
waveform
Unknown
waveform
Spinning black-hole / SGR ringdowns Young pulsars
high-mass inspirals (glitchy)
John Rowe, CSIRO
15
A week’s histogram:
If system is optimally located and oriented, we can
see even further: we are surveying hundreds of
galaxies
John Rowe, CSIRO
16
17
•! I+,*'1#*#"*@#",*-,',/'#"+8*+,%"/=*H#"*-#7A3,*#"*'"($3,*".$3"$/-3,*`'"(&&,"+a*
•! h%)*()H,"*@%++,+*%)-*`,HH,/'(2,a*-(+'%)/,Q**
•! O+'(@%',*()2,"+,*H%3+,*%3%"@*$"#A%A(3('B*#H**",+73'()&*/%)-(-%',+8*-,',/'(#)G*
John Rowe, CSIRO
S5 Year 1 Search for “Low-Mass” Inspirals
Blue – Coincident
Gray – Time lag
Triple Double Double
18
•! Y#*,2(-,)/,*#H*,:/,++*
•! I+,*-,',/'(#)*,HH(/(,)/B*%)-*+7"2,B,-*&%3%:(,+**
******!*J,'*7$$,"*3(@('*2+*+',33%"*@%++* ***
% 8"=.T%2')T%K%PU%<RSSUA%ORRSSO%
John Rowe, CSIRO
BH-BH NS-BH
L10 = 1010 ! blue solar luminosity
Milky Way = 1.7 L10
19
DE;*UiUTUP*
•! G"+&$V%"#&D%;#66#5&#=%:9&.$%
–! Q%-'#D*,;%6+D'-%C+&%."+&$%(2I.F%
:*,#&=%6'&;'&%*,)+-)*,;%#%
,'9$&+,%.$#&%
•! 8+.*$*+,%<C&+6%M8NA%4+,.*.$',$%>*$"%
:'*,;%*,%WXO%<Q,D&+6'D#A%
•! YM(Z%[O%#,D%[R%>'&'%+3'&#$*,;%
•! 2'.9-$%C&+6%<.')'&#-A%YM(Z%.'#&4"'.F%
N+%3-#9.*:-'%(!%.*;,#-%C+9,D\%
$"'&'C+&'%)'&=%9,-*B'-=%$+%:'%
C&+6%#%:*,#&=%6'&;'&%*,%WXO%
*******Q3T%]T%^_O%<RSS_A%O`OU%
%%%%%%!%Y*B'-=%>#.%G(2%;*#,$%C-#&'%*,%WXO%
IPN 3-sigma error region from Mazets et al., ApJ 680, 545
20
hRSS
S5 Year 1 Search for Untriggered Bursts
Sampling of efficiency curves:
"! Search for double or triple coincident triggers (three algorithms)
"! Check waveform consistency among interferometers – apply vetoes
"! Set a threshold for detection for low false alarm probability
"! Evaluate efficiency for variety of simple waveforms
Parameterize strength in terms of “root sum square of h” : hRSS
21
Detected triggers and
expected background for one algorithm (Coherent
WaveBurst – wavelet-based) for triple-coincident triggers
with fcentral > 200 Hz
Threshold
No candidates found above threshold
in any of the searches ! Set upper limits on rate vs hRSS
Coherent network amplitude arXiv:0905.0020 (May 2009)
22
h"%A*!73+%"*
Upper limits on GW strain amplitude h0
Single-template, uniform prior: 3.4 ! 10–25
Single-template, restricted prior: 2.7 ! 10–25
Multi-template, uniform prior: 1.7 ! 10–24
Multi-template, restricted prior: 1.3 ! 10–24
Chandra
im
age
Mod
el
Implies that GW
emission accounts for " 4% of total
spin-down power
Ap. J. Lett 683 (2008) 45
Use coherent, 9-month, time-domain matched filter Strain amplitude h0
Bayesian PDF
23
Same matched-filter algorithm applied to 116
known pulsars over 23 months of S5
PRELIMINARY
All-sky search for
unknown isolated
neutron stars
Semi-coherent,
stacks of 30-minute,
demodulated power
spectra
(“PowerFlux”)
Linearly polarized
Circularly polarized
24
Phys. Rev. Lett. 102 (2009) 111102
arXiv:0905.1705 (May 2009) 25
All-sky search for
unknown isolated
neutron stars
Coincidence
among multiple 30-
hour coherent
searches
(Einstein@Home)
26
•! DON5^UU*W%))#2,"**
•! f_DN*W%)H#"-*
•! f_DN*f(2()&+'#)*
•! h7"",)'*+,%"/=*$#()'*
•! h7"",)'*+,%"/=*/##"-()%',+*
•! j)#1)*$73+%"+*
•! j)#1)*+7$,")#2%,*",@)%)'+*
http://www.einsteinathome.org/
Your
computer
can help
too!
Improved
(hierarchical)
algorithm
now running
27
•! Q%3&*6+&D*#-%*.+$&+3*4%(!%.$+4"#.$*4%:#4B;&+9,D%*.%3&'D*4$'D%:=%6+.$%4+.6+-+;*4#-%$"'+&*'.T%%
•! (*)',%#,%','&;=%D',.*$=%.3'4$&96%%;><!AV%$"'&'%*.%#%.$&#*,%3+>'&%.3'4$&96F%%
•! L"'%.*;,#-%4#,%:'%.'#&4"'D%C&+6%4&+..54+&&'-#"#$%&'#%'(#!!)*)%"'+,#*&'$!'()")-"$*&.''/0120',%('201234''
•! L"'%C#&$"'&%$"'%D'$'4$+&.V%$"'%-+>'&%$"'%C&'?9',4*'.%%$"#$%4#,%:'%.'#&4"'DT%
NASA, WMAP
28
O%"3B5Jg*WP5fP*;%B,+(%)*\Uk*If8***
#90% = 9.0 ! 10-6 ?RT5Pii*W4C
NASA, WMAP
29
Search for Gravitational Wave Bursts from Soft Gamma Repeaters
Phys Rev Lett 101 (2008) 211102
Search for High Frequency Gravitational Wave Bursts in the First Calendar Year of LIGO's Fifth Science Run
arXiv:0904.4910
Stacked Search for Gravitational Waves from the 2006 SGR 1900+14 Storm
arXiv:0905.0005
Search for Gravitational Waves from Low Mass Compact Binary Coalescence in 186
Days of LIGO's fifth Science Run arXiv:0905.3710
30
Inspirals: High-mass, spinning black holes
Year 2, joint LIGO-Virgo Ringdowns
GRBs
Bursts: Year 2, Joint LIGO-Virgo
GRBs
Continuous wave: Full-S5 all-sky searches (semi-coherent, Einstein@Home)
Directed searches (Cassiopeia A, globular clusters, galactic center, SN1987A)
“Transient CW” sources All-sky binary
Stochastic: Full-S5 isotropic – imminent Directed (anisotropic)
H1-H2 High-frequency (37 kHz – LIGO arm free spectral range)
31
Y++B*,;%Q"'#D%
Both LIGO and Virgo underwent significant upgrades since last
science run:
Initial LIGO ! “Enhanced LIGO”
Initial Virgo ! “Virgo +”
Data taking resumes next week, but with significant commissioning
breaks scheduled to fix noise sources that sustained running reveals
!! Running/commissioning strategy worked very well for LIGO in S5
!! Aiming at up to factor of two improvement in strain sensitivity
(most feasible for higher frequencies)
Shutdown for installation of Advanced LIGO and Virgo – early 2011 (see presentation by G. Losurdo)
32
G'#&4"*,;%C+&%)'&=5-+>5C&'?9',4=%%
.$+4"#.$*4%;&#)*$=%>#)'.%a%%89-.#&%L*6*,;%Q&&#=.%
By precisely monitoring the timings of an array of many millisecond pulsars
in different directions, radio astronomers hope to detect direct evidence of stochastic gravitational waves
!! Look for quadrupolar pattern in solar
system timing residuals
Several groups:
Parkes Pulsar Timing Array (Australia)
European Pulsar Timing Array (U.K., France, Netherlands, Italy)
Nano-Grav (USA)
! Aiming to improve upon existing limit: !(nHz) ! 10-8
Eventual followup with proposed Square Kilometer Array (SKA)
! Aiming to reach !(nHz) ! 10-13
33
G966#&=%Bottom line:
No GW signal detected yet #
But
•! Not all S5 / VSR1 searches completed
•! Upcoming S6 / VSR2 searches should be more sensitive
•! Advanced LIGO / Virgo promise major sensitivity improvements with
orders of magnitude increase in expected event rates
And
•! Radio pulsars may provide alternative first glimpse of the elusive
graviton
34
Extra
Slides
35
YM(Z%Z:.'&)#$+&*'.%
Livingston
Hanford
Observation of nearly simultaneous signals
3000 km apart rules out terrestrial artifacts
36
b*&;+%
Have begun collaborating with Virgo colleagues (Italy/France)
Took data in coincidence for last ~4 months of latest science run
Data exchange and joint analysis underway
Will coordinate closely on detector upgrades and future data taking
3-km Michelson
Interferometer just
outside Pisa, Italy
37
(cZ^SS%
Work closely with the GEO600 Experiment (Germany / UK / Spain)
•! Arrange coincidence data runs when commissioning schedules permit
•! GEO members are full members of the LIGO Scientific Collaboration
•! Data exchange and strong collaboration in analysis now routine
•! Major partners in proposed Advanced LIGO upgrade
600-meter Michelson Interferometer
just outside Hannover, Germany
38
YM(Z%K'$'4$+&%d#4*-*$*'.%
b#4996%G=.$'6%
•!Stainless-steel tubes
(1.24 m diameter, ~10-8 torr)
•!Gate valves for optics isolation
•!Protected by concrete enclosure
39
YM(Z%K'$'4$+&%d#4*-*$*'.%YQGc2%
•! M,C&#&'D%<OS^`%,6V%OS5!A%ND5eQ(%-#.'&%C&+6%Y*;"$>#)'%<,+>%4+66'&4*#-%3&+D94$@A%
•! c-#:+&#$'%*,$',.*$=%f%C&'?9',4=%.$#:*-*g#$*+,%.=.$'6V%*,4-9D*,;%C''D:#4B%C&+6%6#*,%*,$'&C'&+6'$'&%
Z3$*4.%
•! d9.'D%.*-*4#%<"*;"5hV%-+>5#:.+&3$*+,V%O%,6%.9&C#4'%&6.V%Ri546%D*#6'$'&A%
•! G9.3',D'D%:=%.*,;-'%.$''-%>*&'%
•! Q4$9#$*+,%+C%#-*;,6',$%H%3+.*$*+,%)*#%6#;,'$.%f%4+*-.%%
40
YM(Z%K'$'4$+&%d#4*-*$*'.%G'*.6*4%M.+-#$*+,%•! W9-$*5.$#;'%<6#..%f%.3&*,;.A%+3$*4#-%$#:-'%.933+&$%;*)'.%OS^%.933&'..*+,%
•! 8',D9-96%.9.3',.*+,%;*)'.%#DD*$*+,#-%O%H%C%R%.933&'..*+,%#:+)'%jO%[g%
102
100
10-2
10-4
10-6
10-8
10-10
Horizontal
Vertical
10-6
41
f_DN*_)',"H,"#@,',"*N$'(/%3*
J/=,@,*
end test mass
LASER/MC
6W
recycling
mirror
•!Recycling mirror matches losses,
enhances effective power by ~ 50x
150 W
20000 W (~0.5W)
Michelson interferometer
4 km Fabry-Perot cavity
With Fabry-Perot arm cavities
42
!"#$%Y*6*$.%$"'%G',.*$*)*$=%
+C%$"'%M,$'&C'&+6'$'&./*%l! G'*.6*4%,+*.'%f%)*:&#$*+,%-*6*$%#$%
-+>%C&'?9',4*'.%
l! Q$+6*4%)*:&#$*+,.%<L"'&6#-%N+*.'A%*,.*D'%4+63+,',$.%-*6*$%#$%6*D%C&'?9',4*'.%
l! h9#,$96%,#$9&'%+C%-*;"$%<G"+$%N+*.'A%-*6*$.%#$%"*;"%C&'?9',4*'.%
l! W=&*#D%D'$#*-.%+C%$"'%-#.'&.V%'-'4$&+,*4.V%'$4TV%4#,%6#B'%3&+:-'6.%#:+)'%$"'.'%-')'-.%
Best design sensitivity:
~ 3 x 10-23 Hz-1/2 @ 150 Hz
43
“Locking” the Interferometer
Sensing gravitational waves requires sustained resonance in the Fabry-Perot arms and in the
recycling cavity
!! Need to maintain half-integer # of laser wavelengths between mirrors
!! Feedback control servo uses error signals from imposed RF sidebands
!! Four primary coupled degrees of freedom to control
!! Highly non-linear system with 5-6 orders of magnitude in light intensity
Also need to control mirror rotation (“pitch” & “yaw”)
!! Ten more DOF’s (but less coupled)
And need to stabilize laser (intensity & frequency), keep the beam pointed, damp out seismic
noise, correct for tides, etc.,…