The Potential of Green Roofs to Address Habitat Loss in Northern Ireland

The Potential of Green Roofs to Address Habitat Loss in Northern Ireland

MSc Sustainable Design DissertationQueen University, Belfast

Faculty of Engineering and Physical Sciences School of Planning, Architecture and Civil

Engineering

i

The Potential of Green Roofs to Address Habitat Loss in

Northern IrelandMSc Sustainable Design Dissertation Faculty of Engineering and Physical

Sciences School of Planning, Architecture and Civil Engineering

Noel Hughes 15259021 QUEEN’S UNIVERSITY BELFAST September 2011

iii

i

Abstract The Potential of Green Roofs to Address Habitat Loss in Northern Ireland The aim of this report is to assess the potential, if any, for green roofs in urban areas to act as habitat islands and the ability of such an approach to affect the local/regional ecology in regards to both flora and fauna species. An investigation into green roof construction and the characteristics of Northern Ireland’s natural habitats will be combined to evaluate whether or not natural environments can be replicated on Northern Ireland’s rooftops. The results of this exercise will be compared to international examples of urban green roofing programmes to assess the environmental value of such an undertaking in Northern Ireland. The central goal of this report is to provide an informed argument on green roofs potential on Northern Irish ecologies and if any natural habitat is capable of being successfully recreated on rooftops. The study also seeks to explore whether green roofs can feasibly counteract natural habitat loss in Northern Ireland and if so what are the possible environmental benefits to urban centre and the surrounding landscape.

iv

ii

Table of Contents Chapters and Heading of the Dissertation Introduction The Relationship between Green Roofs and Natural Habitats …01 In‐01 Green Roofs connection to Habitat Creation …02 In‐02 Habitat Loss in Northern Ireland …03 In‐03 Impact of Existing Green Roof on Surrounding Habitats …04 In‐04 International Approaches to Rooftop Greening …05 Methodology …07 Chapter 1 Habitat Creation on Green Roofs …09 1‐01 Green Roof Components …10 1‐02 Structural Considerations …11 1‐03 Roof Slope …12 1‐04 Nutrients & Water Requirements …12 1‐05 Substrate Makeup …13 1‐06 Soil Depth and Planting Regiments …14 1‐07 Biological Limitations …15 1‐08 Green Roof Maintenance …16 1‐09 Insulating Effects of Green Roofs …16 1‐10 Benefits of Green Roof to the Urban Environments …16 1‐11 Green Roofs effect on People …17 1‐12 Habitats Favoured by Rooftop Environments …17 Chapter 2 Habitat Loss in Northern Ireland …20 2‐01 Tidal Marine Habitats …22 2‐02 Coastal Habitats …25 2‐03 Freshwater and Wetland Habitats …28 2‐04 Woodland Habitats …31 2‐05 Grassland Habitats …34 2‐06 Heathland Habitats …37 2‐07 Peatland Habitats …40 2‐08 Rate of Habitat Change …43 Chapter 3 Green Roofs and Created Habitats …45 3‐01 Sand Dunes / Shingles Banks Habitat Case Studies …47 3‐02 Cliffs and Slopes Habitat Case Studies …50 3‐03 Wetland Habitat Case Studies …53 3‐04 Woodland Habitat Case Studies …57 3‐05 Grassland Habitat Case Studies …60 3‐06 Heathland Habitat Case Studies …66 3‐07 Practical Implications of Rooftop Habitat Recreation …70

v

iii

Chapter 4 Green Roof Habitat Creation for Northern Ireland …72 4‐01 Urban Resources in Northern Ireland …73 4‐02 Re‐establishment of Natural Habitats …75 4‐03 Structural Viability of Green Roof Habitats …76 4‐04 Expense of Green Roof Habitat Recreation …77 4‐05 Northern Ireland Accommodating Green Roof Habitats …79 Conclusions Are Green Roofs a Practical Ecological Recourse for Northern Ireland? …85 Cn‐01 Green Roof and Habitats in Northern Ireland …86 Cn‐02 Potential Benefits of Green Roof to Northern Ireland’s Urban Environments …88 Cn‐03 Envisioned Setback to Green Roof development in Northern Ireland …88 Cn‐04 Conclusion of Dissertation …89 References …91 Appendix ‐A Detailed Descriptions of Northern Ireland’s Natural Habitats …101 Appendix ‐B Description of Northern Ireland’s Management of Sensitive Sites (MOSS) Scheme …129

vi

iv

Table of Figures Introduction Figure 1 ‐ Northern Ireland Landscape

NIEA. (2007). Northern Ireland Countryside Survey. Belfast: Northern Ireland Environment Agency. [Photograph] Figure 2 ‐ 3 ‐ 419 Lafayette St, Manhattan

Hurt, A. (2003, August 09). Green City. Retrieved August 22, 2011, from Wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Green_City.jpg

Figure 3 ‐ Lapwing breeding on the Green Roof Brenneisen, S. (2006). Space for Urban Wildlife: Designing Green Roofs as Habitats in Switzerland. Urban Habitats , 4 (1), 27‐36. [Photograph] (Author)

Figure 4 ‐ Northern Ireland Grassland Countryside Survey. (2007). Countryside Survey: UK Results from 2007. Countryside Survey UK: London. [Photograph] (Mark Wright)

Figure 5 ‐ Moos Filtration Plant Wollishofen Zurich Gedge, D. (2010, March 15). Green Roofs of the World 1 ‐ Moos Filtration Plant Zurich. Retrieved June 21, 2011, from Livingroofs.org: http://livingroofs.org/20100315195/green‐roofs‐of‐the‐world/moos‐zurich.html [Photograph] (Author)

Figure 6 ‐ Laban Dance Centre, London Gedge, D. (2002). Roofspace: a place for brownfield biodiversity? Ecos , 22, (3/4), 69–74. [Photograph] (Author)

Figure 7 ‐ 47° pitched Roof Berlin‐Kreuzberg Köhler, M. (2006). Long‐Term Vegetation Research on Two Extensive Green Roofs in Berlin. Urban Habitats , 4 (1), 3‐26. [Photograph] (Author)

Figure 8 ‐ Ufa‐Fabrik Center, Berlin‐Templehof Köhler, M. (2006). Long‐Term Vegetation Research on Two Extensive Green Roofs in Berlin. Urban Habitats , 4 (1), 3‐26. [Photograph] (Author)

Chapter 1 Figure 1 ‐ M Central, Sydney

Callaghan, G. (2010, August 19). Gardens in the sky. Retrieved August 8, 2011, from The Australian: http://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/features/gardens‐in‐the‐sky/story‐e6frg8h6‐1225907217961

Figure 2 ‐ Intensive Green Roof Structure Norphadrain® (2008) The inverted roof a sound construction for roof decks! [Photograph] (Norphadrain® Green Roof Systems ‐ Promotional Material)

Figure 3 ‐ Extensive Green Roof Structure Norphadrain® (2008) The inverted roof a sound construction for roof decks! [Photograph] (Norphadrain® Green Roof Systems ‐ Promotional Material)

Figure 4 ‐ PVC Waterproof Membrane Earth Pledge. (2005). Green Roofs: Ecological Design and Construction. Surrey, England: Schiffer.

Figure 5 ‐ Extruded Polystyrene Earth Pledge. (2005). Green Roofs: Ecological Design and Construction. Surrey, England: Schiffer.

Figure 6 ‐ Synthetic Drainage Board Earth Pledge. (2005). Green Roofs: Ecological Design and Construction. Surrey, England: Schiffer.

Figure 7 ‐ Mineral/Organic Medium Earth Pledge. (2005). Green Roofs: Ecological Design and Construction. Surrey, England: Schiffer.

Figure 8 ‐ Green Roof Substrate Layers Dunnett, N., & Kingsbury, N. (2004). Planting Green Roofs and Living Walls. Portland: Timber Press.

Figure 9 ‐ 8 House, Oerestad, Copenhagen Carlson, D. (2010, August 10). BIG’s 8 House wins the 2010 Scandinavian Green Roof Award. Retrieved August 12, 2011, from David Report: http://davidreport.com/201008/big%E2%80%99s‐8‐house‐wins‐the‐2010‐scandinavian‐green‐roof‐award/

Figure 10 ‐ Vancouver Convention Zemtseff, K. (2010, May 20). Wonder what a six‐acre green roof feels like? Retrieved July 28, 2011, from Seattle Daily Journal of Commerce: http://www.djc.com/news/en/12018094.html

Figure 11 ‐ Climatologist Stuart Gaffin at Con Edison Power Plant, Long Island City Moisse, K. (2010, February 2). Over the Top: Data Show "Green" Roofs Could Cool Urban Heat Islands and Boost Water Conservation. Retrieved August 12, 2011, from Scientific American: http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=green‐roof‐climate‐change‐mitigation

Figure 12 ‐ Sedum Mat Installers Dunnett, N., & Kingsbury, N. (2004). Planting Green Roofs and Living Walls. Portland: Timber Press.

7

v

Figure 13 ‐ 70mm Sedum Roof

Roofing Superstore. (2011). Modular Sedium Green Roof. Retrieved July 15, 2011, from roofingsuperstore.co.uk: http://www.roofingsuperstore.co.uk/product/roofing‐accessories/environmentally‐friendly‐products/green‐roofing‐systems/modular‐sedium‐green‐roof‐70mm‐substrate‐1‐metre‐square.html

Figure 14 ‐ Native wildflowers on the Multanomah Building Dunnett, N., & Kingsbury, N. (2004). Planting Green Roofs and Living Walls. Portland: Timber Press.

Figure 15 ‐ Freezing Roof Vegetation Dunnett, N., & Kingsbury, N. (2004). Planting Green Roofs and Living Walls. Portland: Timber Press.

Figure 16 ‐ Rockefeller Centre, New York Earth Pledge. (2005). Green Roofs: Ecological Design and Construction. Surrey, England: Schiffer.

Figure 17 ‐ Mountain Plain grasses and shrubs on Paul Lincke Ufer, Kreuzberg, Germany Dunnett, N., & Kingsbury, N. (2004). Planting Green Roofs and Living Walls. Portland: Timber Press.

Figure 18 ‐ Costal Meadow grasses planted on the Nassau Icehouse Brewery Earth Pledge. (2005). Green Roofs: Ecological Design and Construction. Surrey, England: Schiffer.

Figure 19 ‐ Grass sloped roof on the Vancouver Conference Centre Zemtseff, K. (2010, May 20). Wonder what a six‐acre green roof feels like? Retrieved July 28, 2011, from Seattle Daily Journal of Commerce: http://www.djc.com/news/en/12018094.html

Figure 20 ‐ Heath Planting on Sloped Roof at Schiphol Plaza, Amsterdam Airport Earth Pledge. (2005). Green Roofs: Ecological Design and Construction. Surrey, England: Schiffer.

Figure 21 ‐ University Hospital Basel Earth Pledge. (2005). Green Roofs: Ecological Design and Construction. Surrey, England: Schiffer.

Figure 22 ‐ John Deere Works, Mannheim Earth Pledge (2005) Green Roofs: Ecological Design and Construction. Surrey, England: Schiffer.

Chapter 2 Figure 1 ‐ Northern Ireland's Areas of Outstanding Natural Beauty

Countryside Survey. (2008). Countryside Survey: UK Results from 2007. Lancaster: Natural Environment Research Council.

Figure 2 ‐ Dundrum Bay, Down CVNI. (2011). Priority Habitats ‐ Coastal ‐ Sublittoral Sands and Gravels. Retrieved July 20, 2011, from Conservation Volunteers Northern Ireland: http://www.cvni.org/biodiversity/index.php/Habitats/habitat/sublittoral_sands_and_gravels/

Figure 3 ‐ Eelgrass, North Strangford Lough CVNI. (2011). Priority Habitats ‐ Coastal ‐ Seagrass Beds. Retrieved July 20, 2011, from Conservation Volunteers Northern Ireland: http://www.cvni.org/biodiversity/index.php/Habitats/habitat/seagrass_beds/

Figure 4 ‐ Millbay, Antrim Northern Ireland Habitat Action Plan. (2003). Mudflats. Belfast: Northern Ireland Environment Agency.

Figure 5 ‐ Ballymacormick Point, Bangor CVNI. (2011). Priority Habitats ‐ Coastal ‐ Coastal Saltmarsh. Retrieved July 20, 2011, from Conservation Volunteers Northern Ireland: http://www.cvni.org/biodiversity/index.php/Habitats/habitat/coastal_saltmarsh/

Figure 6 ‐ Strand Lough, Down CVNI. (2011). Priority Habitats ‐ Marine ‐ Saline Lagoons. Retrieved July 20, 2011, from Conservation Volunteers Northern Ireland: http://www.cvni.org/biodiversity/index.php/Habitats/habitat/saline_lagoons/

Figure 7 ‐ Northern Ireland's Marine Habitats (Countryside Survey, 2008) Countryside Survey. (2008). Countryside Survey: UK Results from 2007. Lancaster: Natural Environment Research Council.

Figure 8 ‐ Murlough Dunes, Dundrum Bay CVNI. (2011). Priority Habitats ‐ Coastal ‐ Coastal Sand Dunes. Retrieved July 20, 2011, from Conservation Volunteers Northern Ireland: http://www.cvni.org/biodiversity/index.php/Habitats/habitat/coastal_sand_dunes/

Figure 9‐ Kearney, Down Northern Ireland Habitat Action Plan. (2005). Coastal Vegetated Shingle. Belfast: Northern Ireland Environment Agency.

Figure 10 ‐ Carrick ‐a‐Rede Cliffs, Antrim CVNI. (2011). Priority Habitats ‐ Coastal ‐ Maritime Cliffs and Slopes. Retrieved July 20, 2011, from Conservation Volunteers Northern Ireland: http://www.cvni.org/biodiversity/index.php/Habitats/habitat/maritime_cliffs_and_slopes/

Figure 11 ‐ Northern Ireland's Coastal Habitats (Countryside Survey, 2008) Countryside Survey. (2008). Countryside Survey: UK Results from 2007. Lancaster: Natural Environment Research Council.

Figure 12 ‐ Upper Lough Erne

8

vi

CVNI. (2011). Priority Habitats ‐ Wetland ‐ Eutrophic Standing Water. Retrieved July 20, 2011, from Conservation Volunteers Northern Ireland: http://www.cvni.org/biodiversity/index.php/Habitats/habitat/eutrophic_standing_water/

Figure 13 ‐ Tower Lake, Newtownstewart CVNI. (2011). Priority Habitats ‐ Wetland ‐ Mesotrophic Lakes. Retrieved July 20, 2011, from Conservation Volunteers Northern Ireland: http://www.cvni.org/biodiversity/index.php/Habitats/habitat/mesotrophic_lakes1/

Figure 14 ‐ Knockballymore Lough, Fermanagh Northern Ireland Habitat Action Plan. (2005). Marl Lakes. Belfast: Northern Ireland Environment Agency.

Figure 15 ‐ Castle Espie, Down CVNI. (2011). Priority Habitats ‐ Wetland ‐Reed Bed. Retrieved July 20, 2011, from Conservation Volunteers Northern Ireland: http://www.cvni.org/biodiversity/index.php/Habitats/habitat/reed_bed/

Figure 16 ‐ Insh Marshes, Scotland NIEA. (2010, March 18). Freshwater and Wetlands. Retrieved July 23, 2011, from NIEA ‐ Conserving Biodiversity ‐ Habitats: http://www.doeni.gov.uk/niea/biodiversity/habitats‐2/freshwater_and_wetlands.htm

Figure 17 ‐ Northern Ireland's Freshwater & Wetland Habitats (Countryside Survey, 2008) Countryside Survey. (2008). Countryside Survey: UK Results from 2007. Lancaster: Natural Environment Research Council.

Figure 18 ‐ Belvoir Park Forest, Belfast Northern Ireland Native Woodland Group. (2008). Northern Ireland Native Woodland: Definitions and Guidance. Belfast: Forest Service NI.

Figure 19 ‐ Bonds Glen, Derry CVNI. (2011). Priority Habitats ‐ Woodland ‐ Wet Woodland. Retrieved July 20, 2011, from Conservation Volunteers Northern Ireland: http://www.cvni.org/biodiversity/index.php/Habitats/habitat/wet_woodland/

Figure 20 ‐ Glenarm Woodlands, Antrim Northern Ireland Habitat Action Plan. (2005). Mixed Ashwoods . Belfast: Northern Ireland Environment Agency.

Figure 21 ‐ Breen Oakwood, Antrim CVNI. (2011). Priority Habitats ‐ Woodland ‐ Oakwood. Retrieved July 20, 2011, from Conservation Volunteers Northern Ireland: http://www.cvni.org/biodiversity/index.php/Habitats/habitat/oakwood/

Figure 22 ‐ Northern Ireland's Woodland Habitats (Countryside Survey, 2008) Countryside Survey. (2008). Countryside Survey: UK Results from 2007. Lancaster: Natural Environment Research Council.

Figure 23 ‐ Wangford Warren, Suffolk CVNI. (2011). Priority Habitats ‐ Grassland ‐ Lowland meadows. Retrieved July 20, 2011, from Conservation Volunteers Northern Ireland: http://www.cvni.org/biodiversity/index.php/Habitats/habitat/lowland_meadows/

Figure 24 ‐ Little Deer Park, Antrim CVNI. (2011). Priority Habitats ‐ Grassland ‐ Calcareous Grassland. Retrieved July 20, 2011, from Conservation Volunteers Northern Ireland: http://www.cvni.org/biodiversity/index.php/Habitats/habitat/calcareous_grassland/

Figure 25 ‐ Tees Valley, Middlesbrough NIEA. (2010, March 19). Farmlands and Grasslands . Retrieved July 18, 2011, from Northern Ireland Environment Agency: http://www.doeni.gov.uk/niea/biodiversity/habitats‐2/farmlands_and_grasslands.htm

Figure 26 ‐ Slievenacloy, Belfast Hills CVNI. (2011). Priority Habitats ‐ Grassland ‐ Purple moor grassland and rush pasture. Retrieved July 20, 2011, from Conservation Volunteers Northern Ireland: http://www.cvni.org/biodiversity/index.php/Habitats/habitat/purple_moor_grassland_and_rush_pasture/

Figure 27 ‐ Knockmore, Fermanagh CVNI. (2011). Priority Habitats ‐ Grassland ‐ Limestone Pavement. Retrieved July 20, 2011, from Conservation Volunteers Northern Ireland: http://www.cvni.org/biodiversity/index.php/Habitats/habitat/limestone_pavement/

Figure 28 ‐ Northern Ireland's Grassland Habitats (Countryside Survey, 2008) Countryside Survey. (2008). Countryside Survey: UK Results from 2007. Lancaster: Natural Environment Research Council.

Figure 29 ‐ Murlough National Nature Reserve CVNI. (2011). Priority Habitats ‐ Peatland ‐ Lowland Heathland. Retrieved July 20, 2011, from Conservation Volunteers Northern Ireland: http://www.cvni.org/biodiversity/index.php/Habitats/habitat/lowland_heathland/

Figure 30 ‐ Bloody Bridge near Newcastle Northern Ireland Habitat Action Plan. (2003). Upland Heathland. Belfast: Northern Ireland Environment Agency.

Figure 31 ‐ Mourne Mountains Northern Ireland Habitat Action Plan. (2003). Montane Heath. Belfast: Northern Ireland Environment Agency.

Figure 32 ‐ Northern Ireland's Heathland Habitats (Countryside Survey, 2008) Countryside Survey. (2008). Countryside Survey: UK Results from 2007. Lancaster: Natural Environment Research Council.

Figure 33 ‐ Fairy Water Bogs, Tyrone CVNI. (2011). Priority Habitats ‐ Peatland ‐ Lowland Raised Bogs. Retrieved July 20, 2011, from Conservation Volunteers Northern Ireland: http://www.cvni.org/biodiversity/index.php/Habitats/habitat/lowland_raised_bogs/

9

vii

Figure 34 ‐ Cuilcagh Mountain, Fermanagh Northern Ireland Habitat Action Plan. (2003). Lowland Raised Bog. Belfast: Northern Ireland Environment Agency.

Figure 35 ‐ Corbally Fen, Down CVNI. (2011). Priority Habitats ‐ Wetland ‐ Fens. Retrieved July 20, 2011, from Conservation Volunteers Northern Ireland: http://www.cvni.org/biodiversity/index.php/Habitats/habitat/fens/

Figure 36 ‐ Northern Ireland's Peatland Habitats (Countryside Survey, 2008) Countryside Survey. (2008). Countryside Survey: UK Results from 2007. Lancaster: Natural Environment Research Council.

Chapter 3 Figure 1 ‐ Chicago City Hall

GreenRoof. (2010). Chicago City Hall. Retrieved August 8, 2011, from GreenRoof.com: http://www.greenroofs.com/projects/pview.php?id=21

Figure 2 ‐ Murlough Dunes, Dundrum Bay CVNI. (2011). Priority Habitats ‐ Coastal ‐ Coastal Sand Dunes. Retrieved July 20, 2011, from Conservation Volunteers Northern Ireland: http://www.cvni.org/biodiversity/index.php/Habitats/habitat/coastal_sand_dunes/

Figure 3 ‐ Kearney, Down Northern Ireland Habitat Action Plan. (2005). Coastal Vegetated Shingle. Belfast: Northern Ireland Environment Agency.

Figure 4 ‐ National Trust Visitor Centre, Portstewart Strand GreenRoof. (2010). National Trust Visitor Centre at Portstewart Strand. Retrieved August 8, 2011, from GreenRoof.com: http://www.greenroofs.com/projects/pview.php?id=904

Figure 5 ‐ Carrick‐a‐Rede Cliffs, Antrim CVNI. (2011). Priority Habitats ‐ Coastal ‐ Maritime Cliffs and Slopes. Retrieved July 20, 2011, from Conservation Volunteers Northern Ireland: http://www.cvni.org/biodiversity/index.php/Habitats/habitat/maritime_cliffs_and_slopes/

Figure 6 ‐ Gallie Craig Coffee Shop, Drummore, Scotland GreenRoof. (2010). Gallie Craig Coffee Shop. Retrieved August 8, 2011, from GreenRoof.com: http://www.greenroofs.com/projects/pview.php?id=312

Figure 7 ‐ Castle Espie, Down CVNI. (2011). Priority Habitats ‐ Wetland ‐Reed Bed. Retrieved July 20, 2011, from Conservation Volunteers Northern Ireland: http://www.cvni.org/biodiversity/index.php/Habitats/habitat/reed_bed/

Figure 8 ‐ Insh Marshes, Scotland NIEA. (2010, March 18). Freshwater and Wetlands. Retrieved July 23, 2011, from NIEA ‐ Conserving Biodiversity ‐ Habitats: http://www.doeni.gov.uk/niea/biodiversity/habitats‐2/freshwater_and_wetlands.htm

Figure 9 ‐ BMW Düsseldorf Office Building GreenRoof. (2010). BMW Düsseldorf Office Building. Retrieved August 8, 2011, from GreenRoof.com: http://www.greenroofs.com/projects/pview.php?id=500

Figure 10 ‐ Belvoir Park Forest, Belfast Northern Ireland Native Woodland Group. (2008). Northern Ireland Native Woodland: Definitions and Guidance. Belfast: Forest Service NI.

Figure 11 ‐ Bonds Glen, Derry CVNI. (2011). Priority Habitats ‐ Woodland ‐ Wet Woodland. Retrieved July 20, 2011, from Conservation Volunteers Northern Ireland: http://www.cvni.org/biodiversity/index.php/Habitats/habitat/wet_woodland/

Figure 12 ‐ Glenarm Woodlands, Antrim Northern Ireland Habitat Action Plan. (2005). Mixed Ashwoods . Belfast: Northern Ireland Environment Agency.

Figure 13 ‐ Breen Oakwood, Antrim CVNI. (2011). Priority Habitats ‐ Woodland ‐ Oakwood. Retrieved July 20, 2011, from Conservation Volunteers Northern Ireland: http://www.cvni.org/biodiversity/index.php/Habitats/habitat/oakwood/

Figure 14 ‐ Hundertwasserhaus, Vienna Earth Pledge. (2005). Green Roofs: Ecological Design and Construction. Surrey, England: Schiffer.




Figure 18 ‐ Slievenacloy, Belfast Hills

10

viii

CVNI. (2011). Priority Habitats ‐ Grassland ‐ Purple moor grassland and rush pasture. Retrieved July 20, 2011, from Conservation Volunteers Northern Ireland: http://www.cvni.org/biodiversity/index.php/Habitats/habitat/purple_moor_grassland_and_rush_pasture/

Figure 19 ‐ Knockmore, Fermanagh CVNI. (2011). Priority Habitats ‐ Grassland ‐ Limestone Pavement. Retrieved July 20, 2011, from Conservation Volunteers Northern Ireland: http://www.cvni.org/biodiversity/index.php/Habitats/habitat/limestone_pavement/

Figure 20 ‐ Ducks Unlimited National Headquarters, Winnipeg, Canada GreenRoof. (2010). Ducks Unlimited Canada National HQ & Oak Hammock Marsh Interpretive Centre. Retrieved August 8, 2011, from GreenRoof.com: http://www.greenroofs.com/projects/pview.php?id=463




Figure 24 ‐ North German Bank, Hanover, Germany GreenRoof. (2010). North German Bank ‐ NordLB. Retrieved August 8, 2011, from GreenRoof.com: http://www.greenroofs.com/projects/pview.php?id=112

Chapter 4 Figure 1 ‐ Belfast City

NIEA. (2010, April 29). Information for the General Public. Retrieved September 02, 2011, from Northern Ireland Environment Agency: http://www.doeni.gov.uk/niea/de/general_public.htm

Figure 2 ‐ Northern Ireland's Urban Centres (Countryside Survey, 2008) Cooper, A., McCann, T., & Meharg, M. (2002). Habitat Change in the Northern Ireland. Belfast: Environment and Heritage Service.

Figure 3 ‐ Albert Bridge, Belfast NIEA. (2010, March 19). Urban Biodiversity. Retrieved Ausust 12, 2011, from Northern Ireland Environment Agency: http://www.doeni.gov.uk/niea/de/biodiversity/habitats‐2/urban_biodiversity.htm

Figure 4 ‐ UFA Film Fabrik, Berlin Earth Pledge. (2005). Green Roofs: Ecological Design and Construction. Atglen, Pennsylvania : Schiffer Books.

Figure 5 ‐ Atago Building, Tokyo Earth Pledge. (2005). Green Roofs: Ecological Design and Construction. Atglen, Pennsylvania : Schiffer Books.

Figure 6 ‐ Canary Wharf, London Earth Pledge. (2005). Green Roofs: Ecological Design and Construction. Atglen, Pennsylvania : Schiffer Books.

Conclusions Figure 1 ‐ View of the David Kier Building and the greater Belfast area

Queen's University. (2004, January 31). Belfast panorama from queens tower. Retrieved September 02, 2011, from Wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Belfast_panorama_from_queens_tower.jpg

Figure 2 ‐ Costal Meadow grasses planted on the Nassau Icehouse Brewery Earth Pledge. (2005). Green Roofs: Ecological Design and Construction. Surrey, England: Schiffer.

Figure 3 ‐ Heath Planting on Sloped Roof at Schiphol Plaza, Amsterdam Airport Earth Pledge. (2005). Green Roofs: Ecological Design and Construction. Surrey, England: Schiffer.

Figure 4 ‐ Grass sloped roof on the Vancouver Conference Centre Zemtseff, K. (2010, May 20). Wonder what a six‐acre green roof feels like? Retrieved July 28, 2011, from Seattle Daily Journal of Commerce: http://www.djc.com/news/en/12018094.html

Figure 5 ‐ Wood Wharf, London Earth Pledge. (2005). Green Roofs: Ecological Design and Construction. Surrey, England: Schiffer.

Figure 6 ‐ Wildwood Community College, Missouri, USA Gedge, D., & Kadas, G. (2005). Green Roofs and Biodiversity. Biologist , 52 (3), 161‐169.

Figure 7 ‐ Modular Green Roofing System Green Roofs Ireland. (2010). Plants. Retrieved September 03, 2011, from Green Roofs Ireland: http://www.greenroofsireland.co.uk/

Figure 8 ‐ Dundrum Bay, Down CVNI. (2011). Priority Habitats ‐ Coastal ‐ Sublittoral Sands and Gravels. Retrieved July 20, 2011, from Conservation Volunteers Northern Ireland: http://www.cvni.org/biodiversity/index.php/Habitats/habitat/sublittoral_sands_and_gravels/


11

ix



Figure 12 ‐ Kearney, Down Northern Ireland Habitat Action Plan. (2005). Coastal Vegetated Shingle. Belfast: Northern Ireland Environment Agency.


Figure 14 ‐ Slievenacloy, Belfast Hills CVNI. (2011). Priority Habitats ‐ Grassland ‐ Purple moor grassland and rush pasture. Retrieved July 20, 2011, from Conservation Volunteers Northern Ireland: http://www.cvni.org/biodiversity/index.php/Habitats/habitat/purple_moor_grassland_and_rush_pasture/


Figure 16 ‐ Carrick ‐a‐Rede Cliffs, Antrim CVNI. (2011). Priority Habitats ‐ Coastal ‐ Maritime Cliffs and Slopes. Retrieved July 20, 2011, from Conservation Volunteers Northern Ireland: http://www.cvni.org/biodiversity/index.php/Habitats/habitat/maritime_cliffs_and_slopes/

Figure 17 ‐ Knockballymore Lough, Fermanagh Northern Ireland Habitat Action Plan. (2005). Marl Lakes. Belfast: Northern Ireland Environment Agency.


xii

x

Table of Tables Chapter 1 Table 1 ‐ Material Loading (Dunnett & Kingsbury, 2008)

Dunnett, N., & Kingsbury, N. (2008). Planting Green Roofs and Living Walls. Portland: Timber Press. Table 2 ‐ Required Roof Loading (Adler, 1999)

Adler, D. (1999). Metric Handbook: Planning and Design Data. Oxford: Architectural Press. Table 3 ‐ Required Depth (Dunnett & Kingsbury, 2008)

Dunnett, N., & Kingsbury, N. (2008). Planting Green Roofs and Living Walls. Portland: Timber Press. Table 4 ‐ Green Roof Summer Temperatures

Gaffin, S. (2006, July 31). NASA Earth Observatory. Retrieved October 19, 2011, from Whites Versus Greens: http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/Features/GreenRoof/greenroof3.php

Chapter 2 Table 1 ‐ Leading Causes of Tidal Marine Habitat Loss

Cooper, A., McCann, T., & Meharg, M. (2002). Habitat Change in the Northern Ireland. Belfast: Environment and Heritage Service.

Table 2 ‐ Leading Causes of Coastal Habitat Loss Cooper, A., McCann, T., & Meharg, M. (2002). Habitat Change in the Northern Ireland. Belfast: Environment and Heritage Service.

Table 3 ‐ Leading Causes of Freshwater and Wetland Habitat Loss Cooper, A., McCann, T., & Meharg, M. (2002). Habitat Change in the Northern Ireland. Belfast: Environment and Heritage Service.

Table 4 ‐ Leading Causes of Woodland Habitat Loss Cooper, A., McCann, T., & Meharg, M. (2002). Habitat Change in the Northern Ireland. Belfast: Environment and Heritage Service.

Table 5 ‐ Leading Causes of Grassland Habitat Loss Cooper, A., McCann, T., & Meharg, M. (2002). Habitat Change in the Northern Ireland. Belfast: Environment and Heritage Service.

Table 6 ‐ Leading Causes of Heathland Habitat Loss Cooper, A., McCann, T., & Meharg, M. (2002). Habitat Change in the Northern Ireland. Belfast: Environment and Heritage Service.

Table 7 ‐ Leading Causes of Peatland Habitat Loss Cooper, A., McCann, T., & Meharg, M. (2002). Habitat Change in the Northern Ireland. Belfast: Environment and Heritage Service.

Table 8 ‐ Rate of Habitat Change in Northern Ireland (Cooper, McCann, & Rogers, 2009) Cooper, A., McCann, T., & Meharg, M. (2002). Habitat Change in the Northern Ireland. Belfast: Environment and Heritage Service.

Chapter 3 Table 1 ‐ Habitats Capable of Existing on Green Roofs Author Table 2 ‐ Required Roof Type for Habitat Recreation

Author Table 3 – Imposed Roof Loading for Habitat Recreation

Author Chapter 4 Table 1 ‐ Extent of Urban Area in Northern Ireland (Cooper, McCann, & Rogers, 2009)

Cooper, A., McCann, T., & Meharg, M. (2002). Habitat Change in the Northern Ireland. Belfast: Environment and Heritage Service.

Table 2 ‐ Size of Major Urban Centres in Northern Ireland Multple Autors(see table) Table 3 ‐ Northern Ireland Habitat Action Plan Required Restoration of Natural Habitats

Northern Ireland Habitat Action Plan. (2005). Belfast: Northern Ireland Environment Agency. Table4 ‐ Northern Ireland Habitat Action Plan Required Re‐establishment of Natural Habitats

Northern Ireland Habitat Action Plan. (2005). Belfast: Northern Ireland Environment Agency. Table 5 ‐ Required Roof Loading (Adler, 1999)

xiii

xi

Adler, D. (1999). Metric Handbook: Planning and Design Data. Oxford: Architectural Press. Table 6 – Imposed Roof Loading for Habitat Recreation

Author Table 7 – Building Types Capable of Carrying Habitat Roofs

Author Table 8 – Estimable Cost Range for Habitat Recreation

Author Table9 ‐ Northern Ireland Habitat Action Plan Required Re‐establishment of Natural Habitats

Northern Ireland Habitat Action Plan. (2005). Belfast: Northern Ireland Environment Agency. Table 10 ‐ Estimated Costs of introducing wide scale Habitat Roofs to Northern Ireland

Author

1

1

Introduction The Relationship between Green Roofs and Natural Habitats

2

2

The aim of this report is to assess the potential, if any, for green roofs in urban areas to act as habitat islands and the ability of such an approach to affect the local/regional ecology in regards to both flora and fauna species Green roofs are a growing part of urban areas, providing numerous benefits to built‐up regions. They have been proven to be capable of mitigating the urban heat island effect (Skinner, 2006; Alexandri & Jones, 2008) and reduce rainwater runoff (Graceson, Hare, Hall, & Monaghan, 2011; Keeley, 2003). There are also studies indicating that green roofs can sequester carbon (Getter, Rowe, Robertson, Cregg, & Andresen, 2009) and can increase the life span of the roofs, because of the longevity added to covered roof membranes (Porsche & Köhler, 2003). These factors will be further discussed in the first chapter of this report. However the increase in popularity of green roofs is primarily because of the environmental benefits that they bring, particularly in urban areas (NIEA, 2005). This report will aim to establish the possibilities of green roofs to be used in a habitat creation role in Northern Ireland. While long‐term studies on small scale sites have proven that green roof can support complex habitats in London (Gedge D. , 2002) and Basel, Switzerland (Brenneisen S. , 2005) this study aim to gauge if a similar programme of greening would be suitable for the conditions associated with Northern Ireland’s natural habitats. In‐01 Green Roofs connection to Habitat Creation English Nature defines green roofs as “…roofs that have been initially planted, as well as those that have been allowed to colonise and develop naturally” (Grant, Engleback, & Nicholson, 2003). While this is a broad definition, it can be said that the current generation of green roof were largely developed in Germany during the 1960s (Keeley, 2003). There initial reason for the installation was to meet the growing need for urban ecology and city centre gardens in many German cities, principally Berlin (Johnston, 1993). Green roofs are generally categorised into two formats, ‘Intensive’ (heavily planted) and ‘Extensive’ (lightweight planting), based on their structure and plant material. This will be discussed in detail in Chapter 1. Both are capable of supporting a wide variety (all be it very different species) of vegetation and present a potential platform for habitat creation (Francis & Lorimer, 2011). There are numerous examples worldwide of habitats that have been adapted and installed on typical green roofs; these include examples form mountainous zones, coastal areas, dry grasslands, cliffs/scree slopes and many others. (Lundholm, 2006; Dunnett & Kingsbury, 2008). Wet/dry meadows and heath/moor habitats can also be re‐created on rooftops, when the drainage is restricted, or if the substrate provides sufficient water retention. An example of this recreated habitat zone is the green roof system at the water‐filtration plant in Wollishofen, on the outskirts of Zurich (Landolt, 2001).

Figure 1 ‐ Northern Ireland Landscape

Figure 2 ‐ 419 Lafayette St, Manhattan

3

3

Figure 4 ‐ Northern Ireland Grassland

The type of environment that is created on a green roof is principally dictated by the structure of roof itself and the soil makeup, with weather and microclimate conditions being secondary concerns (Dunnett & Kingsbury, 2008). The physical properties of a green roof‘s growing medium will significantly impact plant growth, plant survival and water retention (Graceson, Hare, Hall, & Monaghan, 2011) and to these points will be discussed in chapter 1. In theory given a high level of design and planning, green roofs can provide habitat compensation for rare and endangered species affected by land‐use changes. Numerous studies for various parts of the world (mostly extensive green roofs in Europe) have established through research studies that green roofs posses notable ecological compensation potential (Brenneisen S. , 2006; Jones, 2002; Kadas, 2006). A 20 year study of extensive green roofs in Berlin illustrated that a relatively diverse species populations can be achieved on roofs in urban areas (Köhler, 2006). General statistics states that typically roof space represents up to 32% of the total surface areas in most urban locations (Frazer, 2005). In the Greater London region it is estimates that roofs cover 240 km2, or 16% of the land surface (Grant, 2006). While of course not all roofs are suitable for supporting green roofs; built‐up areas do represent zones of potential ecological expansion. Many regions of most towns and city can be simply redevelopment to support habitat creation. There is huge potential for roof greening on industrial and commercial land on the outskirts of residential areas. It has been proved that extensive greening would lead to significant improvements in local bird populations (Brenneisen S. , 2006) an important factor for Northern Ireland and its importance for migratory bird populations (Countryside Survey, 2008). In‐02 Habitat Loss in Northern Ireland Northern Ireland has a wide range of habitats and species, some of which are of special note (NIEA, 2010). The coastal regions of Northern are of international importance for waterfowl and waders, while upland areas and bogs are renowned for their diversity in plant life and invertebrates (NIEA, 2007).

Currently Northern Ireland is experiencing a loss of natural habitats, commonly due to urban expansion and modern farming practices (Cooper, McCann, & Rogers, 2009). During the past decade, the UK as a whole recorded a 39% loss in area of natural environments and 27% of ‘priority species’ were found to now be in decline (Defra, May 2006). In many parts of the UK there has been a degradation in markers that indicate an environment’s health, such as the UK butterfly population dropping by 55% in the last 30 years (Defra, April 2008) and major declines in bees and amphibians (Margerison, 2008).

Additionally the UK bird population has been depleted by an average of 6% in the last 30 years (Defra, March 2008). Northern Ireland’s natural habitats face a number of risks. The leading cause of habitat loss is the increase in demand for housing over the past decade (NIEA, 2007), especially for new

Figure 3 ‐ Lapwing breeding on the Green Roof

4

4

housing in coastal regions were construction was commonly on virgin land (MOSS, 2009). Another general treat to Northern Ireland’s ecology is species invasion. Species such as the Zebra Mussel, Japanese Knotweed and the New Zealand Flatworm are all extremely invasive and damaging to native wildlife (Biodiversity NI, 2011). Habitat concerns exclusive to Northern Ireland centre around the diminishment of habitats uniquely indigenous to this country, primarily wet grasslands, boglands and native forests. Currently the peat bogs in Northern Ireland suffer from over grazing, excess harvesting of turf, and the machining of peat in gardening products (Biodiversity NI, 2011). Additionally, Northern Ireland is one of the least wooded countries in Europe, with only 6% tree cover and the majority of woodland is non‐native conifer species (MOSS, 2009). Finally the national wet grassland are crucial for migrating bird populations and the reduction in there range because of farming practices has had a knock on effect. The Curlew, Snipe, Redneck and Lepwing who breed on wet grassland and bogs have declined in numbers by over 50% in the Last 20 years and the common House Sparrow population has declined 19% between 1994 and 2006 (Biodiversity NI, 2011). These statements express only a surface overview of the many issues facing the ecology of Northern Ireland’s natural habitats. There are numerous cases where local ecosystem have grown and developed alongside modern developments. A more in‐depth analysis of the importance and influences of habitat types in Northern Ireland will be undertaken later in this report. In‐03 Impact of Existing Green Roof on Surrounding Habitats An extensive catalogue of case studies exists demonstrating the ecological consequences of installing green roofs. Most study either focus on flora, invertebrates or birds, there are two reasons for this; they represent good indicator to the health to a habitat (Defra, May 2006) and secondly they are the principle animal that occupy roof garden (Brenneisen & Hänggi, 2006). Although a fox was found wander on the Belfast Castle Court Centre roof in June 2009 (Biodiversity NI, 2009).

The ability for green roof to accommodate any plant species is a simple matter of carful design (Burgess, 2004; Dunnett N. , 2006), but it is common for plants to naturally migrate to roof garden and on occasion extremely rare plant species have unexpectedly been found happily living at roof level. In Wollishofen, Zurich; nine near extinct orchid species were found existing alongside 175 other plant species on the grass roofs of four water plants. This was a surprise as the green roofs were never

intended to be an ecological centre when they were installed in 1914 (Landolt, 2001). Research from both America and Europe has shown that green roofs are adept at attracting and supporting colonies of insect species, with the elevated locating of the vegetation having a negligible impact. Green roofs on the Ford assembly Plant, in Dearborn, Michigan was shown to become home to 29 insect species, seven spider species, and two bird species within the first two years of its installation. (Coffman & Davis, 2005). And construction laws in Basel, Switzerland were changed when a biodiversity study of seventeen green roofs found 78 spider and 254 beetle species. Of which 18% of the spiders species and 11% of the

Figure 5 ‐ Moos Filtration Plant Wollishofen Zurich

5

5

beetles were found to be rare and some considered as endangered (Brenneisen S. , 2006). These finding will be expanded upon throughout this report. Bird species can benefit greatly from the installation of green roofs. Swifts which migrate to Northern Ireland in late summer on their way to winter in Africa already inhabit the roofs of many existing buildings (Biodiversity NI, 2009). And green roofs can greatly enhance the habitability of many existing structures (Grant G. , 2006). Already the sedum roof at Belfast’s Victoria Centre is home to nesting jackdaws, blackbirds and finches (Biodiversity NI, 2009). In‐depth research into the occupation of green roofs by birds has been undertaken in London. Two roofs in East and West Sussex studied during 2004 found that 70% of the total duration of all bird activity involved the use of resources provided by the vegetation on the roofs, i.e. birds spent most of their time feeding and collecting nest material (Burgess, 2004). Four species of high conservation concern and two of moderate conservation concern were observed using the roofs. The study concludes that if careful consideration is taken over the design of green roofs, then they could play an important role in secure the future the most threatened birds species (Burgess, 2004). The most endangered species observed on a green roof was Black Red Start (Grant G. , 2006). Between 50 and 100 breeding pairs of this highly endangered species was seen nesting (Frith & Gedge, 2000) on the on the Laban Centre and the Creekside Centre, both in the London Docklands. In‐04 International Approaches to Rooftop Greening The potential value of green roofs in urban centres has not gone unnoticed by policy makers around the world. With their benefits towards the heat island effect (Skinner, 2006; Alexandri & Jones, 2008), runoff (Graceson, Hare, Hall, & Monaghan, 2011; Keeley, 2003) and ecology (Dunnett & Kingsbury, 2008), numerous planning and development bodies are accommodating and actively promoting green roofs in future building projects. Because of the extensive body of research undertaken in Basel by Dr Stephan Brenneisen, the city has amendment its building and construction laws. Now as part of the city's biodiversity strategy, green roofs are now mandatory on all new buildings with flat roofs (Brenneisen S. , 2006). Also if new green roofs exceed 500m2, then there substrates must be composed of natural soils and accommodate vegetation which comes from the surrounding region (Brenneisen S. , 2005). The London 2012 Olympics aims to construct at least 0.4ha (4,000m2) of green roofs on selected buildings as part of its Biodiversity Action Plan (Olympic Delivery Authority, 2008). And in Japan, green roofs are favoured by developers are the increase the retail value of their properties by an averaging 8% (CABE, 2005). These and other policies will be explored in the fourth chapter of this report.

Figure 6 ‐ Laban Dance Centre, London

Figure 7 ‐ 47° pitched Roof Berlin‐Kreuzberg

6

6

However the most comprehensive standards for green roof growing media can currently be found in Germany (FLL, 2002).The German guidelines are regularly used by the green roofing industry throughout Europe and the UK as they provide excellent information on creating growing media, vegetation growing conditions, water retention requirements and load capacity (FLL, 2002). These benchmark were built‐up over the past number of decades, as the German have a widespread use of green roofs because of policy, like those in Berlin, where green roofs

were required to be constructed on apartments roof between 1983 until 1996 (Köhler, 2006).

Figure 8 ‐ Ufa‐Fabrik Centre, Berlin‐Templehof

7

Methodology Aims and Objectives of the Report

7

7

Methodology Aims and Objectives of the Report

8

8

As stated the aim of this report is to assess the potential to of green roofs to negate natural habitat loss in Northern Ireland, by providing an alternative to traditional methods of habitat recreation and maximise the benefit of urban areas to the local flora and fauna. This will be done through a series of examinations and comparative exercise. The initial task is to investigate the limitations place on habitat creation by the physical conditions of a roof structure. This undertaking will provide a knowledge base for the development of habitats at roof level and highlight the types of ecosystems naturally adapted to the circumstances of Northern Ireland’s rooftops. This undertaking will be combined with an examination into the current condition of natural habitats in Northern Ireland, examining their requirement, features and characteristics that classifies them as a unique eco‐zone. This undertaking will establish the feasibility of which environments can be recreated at roof level. On completion of these two undertakings, a list of habitations that are capable of existing on roofs in Northern Ireland will be generated. This will then inform the second part of this report on the connotation of building such environments in Northern Ireland’s urban centres. The latter chapters of this dissertation will consist of an examination into case study green roof projects. These examples will consist of high quality examples of habitat recreation rooftops, demonstrating the practical requirements of green roof construction. Finally the discussion and analysis of the information produced in this report will be discussed, and the implications of the information produced in this report and the role that local government can have on the combination of ecology and the built environment. The final goal of this report is to provide an informed argument on green roofs potential effect to the Northern Ireland ecology and where any natural habitat is capable of being successfully recreated on rooftops. Qualify whether green roofs can first feasible counteraction the habitat loss in Northern Ireland and secondly if embarking upon such an exercise would produce a gainful environmental benefit to urban centre and the surrounding landscape.

9

20

Chapter 1 Habitat Creation on Green Roofs

10

21

Green roofs are a relatively new building element in Northern Ireland, with few examples of fully realised grass or vegetation covered roofs existing in the province (Biodiversity NI, 2011). However the implementation of green roofs is a mature part of the construction industry within continental Europe, particularly Germany (Gedge & Kadas, 2005). For example during 2001, 14% of all new flat roofs constructed in Germany were green roofs, accounting for 13.5million m2 as part of national and regional environmental legislation (Earth Pledge, 2005).

Completed examples of green roofs in Northern Ireland represent a limited level of ambition in regard to ecological resource creation (Gedge & Kadas, 2005). With the predominant form of green roofs consisting of thin, prefabricated vegetation mats (Emilsson, 2003). Examples of purpose developed habitat rooftops are sporadic, with a limit number of examples in the UK (Dunnett & Kingsbury, 2008). Rooftops, especially those in dense urban centres, are a challenging environments for both flora and fauna species. Habitat that are created often have to accommodate period of drought, excessive temperature ranges and wind exposure; element that may be alien in their natural settings (White & Snodgrass, 2003). In practice, rooftop micro‐climates vary greatly depending local conditions and urban typology (Dunnett, 2006). However as mention during the introduction, the physical attributes of a green roof’s construction will have a greater impact on the range of supportable species than the local roof level climate conditions (Brenneisen S. , 2006; Köhler, 2006). This will be further discussed throughout this chapter 1‐01 Green Roof Components As briefly mentioned during the introductory chapter there are two prevailing forms of green roof structure, ‘Intensive’ and ‘Extensive’. While there are a number of variations of these systems the following descriptions are representative of the prevailing structural makeup of a green roof. Intensive Green Roofs are the typical construction method for roof gardens and grass roof because they are capable of supporting complex vegetation such as groundcovers, small trees and shrubs. These roofs often possess a substrate (soil) layer deeper than 20cm and typically require irrigation systems, maintenance and additional reinforcement to the building’s roof structure to support the live loading of the plant material. (Oberndorfer, et al., 2007).

Extensive Green Roofs are lighter than ‘Intensive’ roofs. With substrate layers with thicknesses below 20cm, and are generally planted with sedum and herbaceous species such as mosses. These roof require minimal or no irrigation and no additional strengthen to a typical roof structure. (Dunnett & Kingsbury, 2008; Oberndorfer, et al., 2007). Also extensive green roofs do not necessarily require a flat roof, but can exist at an angle of up to 40 degrees. (Gedge & Kadas, 2005)

Figure 1 ‐ M Central, Sydney

Figure 3 ‐ ExtensiveGreen Roof Structure

Figure 2 ‐ Intensive GreenRoof Structure

11

21

Green roofs are a relatively new building element in Northern Ireland, with few examples of fully realised grass or vegetation covered roofs existing in the province (Biodiversity NI, 2011). However the implementation of green roofs is a mature part of the construction industry within continental Europe, particularly Germany (Gedge & Kadas, 2005). For example during 2001, 14% of all new flat roofs constructed in Germany were green roofs, accounting for 13.5million m2 as part of national and regional environmental legislation (Earth Pledge, 2005).

Completed examples of green roofs in Northern Ireland represent a limited level of ambition in regard to ecological resource creation (Gedge & Kadas, 2005). With the predominant form of green roofs consisting of thin, prefabricated vegetation mats (Emilsson, 2003). Examples of purpose developed habitat rooftops are sporadic, with a limit number of examples in the UK (Dunnett & Kingsbury, 2008). Rooftops, especially those in dense urban centres, are a challenging environments for both flora and fauna species. Habitat that are created often have to accommodate period of drought, excessive temperature ranges and wind exposure; element that may be alien in their natural settings (White & Snodgrass, 2003). In practice, rooftop micro‐climates vary greatly depending local conditions and urban typology (Dunnett, 2006). However as mention during the introduction, the physical attributes of a green roof’s construction will have a greater impact on the range of supportable species than the local roof level climate conditions (Brenneisen S. , 2006; Köhler, 2006). This will be further discussed throughout this chapter 1‐01 Green Roof Components As briefly mentioned during the introductory chapter there are two prevailing forms of green roof structure, ‘Intensive’ and ‘Extensive’. While there are a number of variations of these systems the following descriptions are representative of the prevailing structural makeup of a green roof. Intensive Green Roofs are the typical construction method for roof gardens and grass roof because they are capable of supporting complex vegetation such as groundcovers, small trees and shrubs. These roofs often possess a substrate (soil) layer deeper than 20cm and typically require irrigation systems, maintenance and additional reinforcement to the building’s roof structure to support the live loading of the plant material. (Oberndorfer, et al., 2007).

Extensive Green Roofs are lighter than ‘Intensive’ roofs. With substrate layers with thicknesses below 20cm, and are generally planted with sedum and herbaceous species such as mosses. These roof require minimal or no irrigation and no additional strengthen to a typical roof structure. (Dunnett & Kingsbury, 2008; Oberndorfer, et al., 2007). Also extensive green roofs do not necessarily require a flat roof, but can exist at an angle of up to 40 degrees. (Gedge & Kadas, 2005)

Figure 1 ‐ M Central, Sydney

Figure 3 ‐ ExtensiveGreen Roof Structure

Figure 2 ‐ Intensive GreenRoof Structure

22

In practice, a greater variety of planting can occupy intensive green roofs because of their deeper soil layers (Lundholm, 2006), however the shallow substrate of extensive green roofs can be advantages to specialised habitats such as rocky, scree and sand/grave based ecosystems (Dunnett N. , 2006). All green roofs are comprised of the following layers.

Waterproof Membrane Root Protection Barrier; to

prevent root penetration Insulation Drainage and Retention Layer;

which may or may not act as a water reservoir for vegetation

Growing Medium/Substrate; varying in material and depth

Vegetation The thickness and weight of green roofs can differ significantly depending on the chosen planting. The divergence of physical properties of a roof’s structure due to the required habitat recreation shall be explored during this chapter. 1‐02 Structural Considerations Green roofs’ impose a weight loading on its buildings structure, this value fluctuates from inconsequential for extensive roofs to the requirement of additional structural support for heavily planted intensive roofs (Peck & Kuhn, 2000). Extensive roofs are relatively lightweight and are generally within the normal load‐bearing capacity of the majority of modern roofs (Köhler, 2006). Extensive substrates with depths of 5‐15cm will increase the loading on roof by between 70kg/m2‐170kg/m2 (Dunnett & Kingsbury, 2008). The greater substrate depths and vegetation densities of intensive roofs are the principle reason for their larger imposed loading. A comparatively shallow topsoil layer of 10‐15cm can add 500kg/m2 to a roofs weight (Kingsbury, 2001); the added loading of intensive roofs range between 290kg/m2 and 970kg/m2 (Dunnett & Kingsbury, 2008).

Within the UK, roof weight is controlled by British Standard 6399; this states the required strengths for roofing system (Adler, 1999). While the data on green roof loading is

Table 1 ‐Material Loading (Dunnett & Kingsbury, 2008)

Table 2 ‐ Required Roof Loading (Adler, 1999)

Substrate Materials kg/m2 lb/sq.ftGravel 16‐19 8.4‐9.9Pebbles 19 9.9 Pumice 6.5 3.3 Brick (solid with mortar) 18 9.4 Sand 18‐22 9.4‐11.4Sand and Gravel Mixed 18 9.4 Topsoil 17‐20 8.9‐10.4Water 10 5.3 Lava 8 4.1 Permute 5 2.54 Vermiculite 1 0.51 Light Expanded Clay Granules 3‐4 1.5‐2.0

BS6399 Category (General Fig) N/m2 kg/m2

Domestic 1.5 153Offices 2.5 255Retail 4.0 408Warehousing 2.0 204Factories, Workshops 5.0 510

Figure 8 ‐ Green Roof Substrate Layers

Waterproof Membrane Insulation

Figure 4 ‐ PVC Waterproof Membrane

Figure 5 ‐ Extruded Polystyrene

Drainage Layer Substrate

Figure 6 ‐ Synthetic Drainage Board

Figure 7 ‐ Mineral/Organic Medium

12

23

highly individualistic, an argument can be made that lightweight extensive green roof can be installed on the majority of Northern Ireland roofs without the need for additional strengthening (Peck & Kuhn, 2000). The most common roof‐greening technique is the installation of thin, prefabricated vegetation mats. These mats have a soil substrate layer of about 4cm (1.6in) and weigh around 50‐60kg/m2 (Emilsson, 2003), safely in the load capacity of even domestic roof structures. 1‐03 Roof Slope Public perception of green roofs is that they can only occupy flat roof spaces (Earth Pledge, 2005). However there are numerous examples of green roofs, which have been constructed on prominent slopes. The ability of a green roof to withstand the shear forces imposed by residing on an angle is controlled by the friction coefficient between the two smoothest structural elements, typically membrane interfaces. Unaltered a green roof can resist creep at slopes no steeper than 9.5O or 2:12 (Dunnett & Kingsbury, 2008).

Slippage can be counteracted by the use of horizontal strapping, laths, battens, or grids, increasing the potential gradient to 30O or 7:12 (Dunnett & Kingsbury, 2008). With specialised growing mediums, stake and appropriate plant selection it is possible to achieve slopes over 35O (ZinCo, 2011). In his 2006 report on Berlin green roofs, Mannfred Köhler recorded buildings with 47O grass roof (Köhler, 2006).

1‐04 Nutrients & Water Requirements Through the use of stress‐tolerant planting on green roofs the need for additional nutrients is generally unnecessary (Brenneisen S. , 2006; Köhler, 2006). If a green roof is design as a natural habitat and not subject to excessive landscape management, a natural equilibrium in the roof’s nutrient cycle will develop, with the decay of dead stems and leaves feeding new growth (Dunnett & Kingsbury, 2008). Conversely if a roof undergoes heavy pruning, mowing and the removal of plant litter, plant feeding may be required every two year with slow release nutrient packs (White & Snodgrass, 2003). The requirement for even low levels of landscape management would be rare on any roof design to recreate natural habitats, so add nutrients would not be typically required (Earth Pledge, 2005). However recreational roof gardens are typically highly managed environments and will require similar maintenance as specialised horticulture gardens (Dunnett & Kingsbury, 2008).

Research has proven that a reliably consistent water supply is more important to plant species diversity, than substrate depth on all green roofs (Dunnett & Kingsbury, 2008). Characteristically there are difference in the type of vegetation found in urban centres and the surrounding rural habitats. Inner city plant species tend to be more adapted to dry conditions (Köhler, 2006). Thusly it is recommended that urban green roofs incorporate systems to address periods of relative drought (White & Snodgrass, 2003). A number of studies by Stephen Brenneisen in Switzerland have shown that plant vitality and invertebrate diversity can

Figure 9 ‐ 8 House, Oerestad, Copenhagen

Figure 11 ‐ Climatologist Stuart Gaffin at Con EdisonPower Plant, Long Island City

Figure 10 ‐ Vancouver Convention

13

24

be directly compared to the moisture level in a roof’s substrate (Brenneisen S. , 2001). A number of systems are available for green roof irrigation, most including some form of rainwater storage and recycling systems (Miller, 2003). However as green roofs possess the ability to retain a high rate of rainwater (Graceson, Hare, Hall, & Monaghan, 2011; Keeley, 2003), many roof substrate systems store water in a drainage layer below their growing medium. Research programmes recorded that a 6cm (2.4in) vegetation layer retains 67% of rainwater and a 12cm (4.8in) growth media with a mix of grasses and herbs retains 70% (Scholz‐Barth, 2001), making the need for irrigation redundant. This property of green roofs in urban regions will be discussed later on in this chapter. It is important to note that the need for additional irrigation and nutrients is dictated by local environmental conditions (Peck & Kuhn, 2000), substrate make‐up (Francis & Lorimer, 2011) and most importantly the type of green roof environment one desires (Dunnett & Kingsbury, 2008). The Laban Dance Centre has created a habitat for rare bird species through the use of an extensive gravel roof that requires no maintenance (Frith & Gedge, 2000). 1‐05 Substrate Makeup The knowledge base of the horticultural industry has revealed that the physical properties of a substrate will have a significant impact on the growth rates and survivability of planted vegetation (Blythe & Merhaut, 2007). A roofs substrate layer will effect water retention, nutrient requirement (Miller, 2003) and root temperature (White & Snodgrass, 2003). There are notable differences between the substrates of extensive and intensive roofs. Extensive green roof are characterised by shallow substrate layer and are associated with a low biological diversity (Brenneisen S. , 2006). Typically populated by sedum, grasses, herbs and mosses (Emilsson, 2003), installed on mats of non‐organic mineral fibres which have moisture holding capacity that mimics organic materials (Hitchmough, 1994). Natural soil is not advisable for lightweight extensive roofs, due to their inherent weight and high fertility (which encourages vigorous and unsustainable growth). Medium to low fertility is also a requirement for the development of diverse meadow vegetation, a viable option for habitat recreation on extensive green roofs (Miller, 2003).

Options for intensive substrates range between mixtures of organic material and natural or artificial soils (Snodgrass. & Snodgrass, 2006). Studies of green roofs in Zurich, Switzerland, have shown that natural soils in substrates can benefit biodiversity, due to the acclimatisation of local flora and fauna to native soils (Dunnett & Kingsbury, 2008). Artificial soils, made from material such as sand and lava rock, have also proven to be excellent at promoting plant

growth because of their tailored nature (Hitchmough, 1994). The level of plant (Grant G. , 2006) and invertebrate diversity (Brenneisen S. , 2006) can be directly related to the soil depth, age, establishment of planting and the nature of a substrate, for both extensive and intensive roofing systems (Miller, 2003). Typically the species range of green roofs naturally evolves with time, through establishment and natural species migration and colonisation (Brenneisen S. , 2006). Presently the level of industrial

Figure 13 ‐ 70mm Grass Roof

Figure 12 ‐ Sedum Mat Installers

14

25

Table 3 ‐ Required Depth (Dunnett & Kingsbury, 2008)

data within horticultural is sufficient to meet green roof construction needs (Blythe & Merhaut, 2007); unfortunately it has be state that the crossover of experience to the building profession is questionable (Dunnett & Kingsbury, 2008). 1‐06 Soil Depth and Planting Regements Continuing on from the importance of substrate composition, the depth of a roof’s substrate layer also influences planting options. This is due to the requirements of root growth and the ability of a substrate to protect its root system from environmental stresses, namely temperature extremes (White & Snodgrass, 2003).

The importance of substrate depth is primarily an issue concerning intensive green roofs as extensive generally do not exceed 20cm (Oberndorfer, et al., 2007). The temperature ranges in Europe has prescribe that thin substrate (under 3cm) can only support sedum and moss species, medium depth substrates (5‐8cm) are capable of maintaining a wider range of grasses, herbs and sub‐shrubs. Depths of above 50cm are required for trees to be grown (Dunnett & Kingsbury, 2008). Designing green roofs so that they have a varying substrate depths and drainage regimes, creating a mosaic of microhabitats (both on and below the surface soil layer) has been shown to facilitate the colonisation of a green roof by a more diverse range of flora and fauna species (Brenneisen S. , 2006).

An important discussion is ongoing between the uses of native or alien plant in green roof developments (Dunnett, 2006) especially as species invasion is a concern for Northern Ireland, as mention in the introductory chapter. The use of local planting can potentially promote the occupation of a roof by local fauna (Brenneisen S. , 2006); unfortunately many native species are highly invasive and dominant and may lead to a reduced planting diversity (Clement & Foster, 1994). Alternatively, many exotic species may be ideally suited to the environment created by the particular microclimate conditions of a green roof (Dunnett & Kingsbury, 2008). Studies undertaken in Switzerland have presented evidence that in dense urban areas; fauna species, especially birds, will dominate rooftops which has similarities to their natural habitats regardless to the proximity to matching ecosystems (Frith & Gedge, 2000). Urban biodiversity strategy can advise on the appropriate plant strategies, based on regional species research (Brenneisen S. , 2006). Planting methods for green roofs are as varied as those for conventional gardens. Extensive roofs utilise vegetation mats, seeds and bulbs regularly being subject to monoculture planting. While intensive roofs are capable of availing of potted and transplanted plants

Soil Depth Planting Possibilities 0‐5cm (0‐2in)

Sedum/Moss communities

5‐10cm (2‐4in)

Dry meadow communitiesLow‐growing drought‐tolerant Perennials Grasses/Alpines Small Bulbs

10‐20cm (4‐8in)

Semi‐extensive mixtures of low to medium dry habitat Perennials Grasses and Annuals Small Shrubs Lawn/Turf Grass

20‐50cm (8‐20in)

Medium shrubs Edible Plants Generalist Perennials and Grasses

50+cm (20+in)

Small Deciduous Trees and Conifers

Figure 14 ‐ Native wildflowers on theMultanomah Building

15

26

Figure 16 ‐ Rockefeller Centre, New York

(Dunnett & Kingsbury, 2008). Spontaneous or natural colonisation occurs frequently on all green roof type, with has led to the occupation of rare and unexpected plant species (Landolt, 2001), as described in the introductory chapter. This issue will be discussed in further detail in chapter 4. 1‐07 Biological Limitations Academic studies have illustrated a number of limitations of green roofs in regards to their biological opportunities when directly compared to ground level urban brownfield sites (Brenneisen & Hänggi, 2006). While certain aspects of green roofs can be improve with careful design and consideration of local environmental assets (Brenneisen S. , 2006), a number of constrains are characteristic to rooftop habitats.

The shallow nature of substrates on roofs, limit the ability of deep‐rooted plants to extract moisture, it also means that root systems will be subject to the extremes of temperature (Boivin, Lamy, Gosselin, & Dansereau, 2001). In order to survive Northern Ireland temperature ranges, the planting of green roofs need to capable of surviving a wide variation in thermal exposures, as roof substrates are not thermally stable (Snodgrass. & Snodgrass, 2006; White & Snodgrass, 2003).

The air/soil mixture level in roof substrates are lower than those of ground soil, this is partly due to the difference between the artificial and natural earth layers (Oberndorfer, et al., 2007), but principally the lack of burrowing invertebrates and earthworms (Brenneisen S. , 2006). Such invertebrates have difficulties surviving on green roofs due to the limited depth of the substrate; perishing during temperature extremes. Because earthworms are the fundamental for the aeration of subsoil, this places server restrictions on plant diversity (Miller, 2003).The practice of adding lava rock, pumice, gravel, broke brick or concrete to roof substrate are utilised, allowing air to penetrate soil layers (Schradera & Boningb, 2006). The value of a green roof as a biological resource is restricted by its size, often hindering the potential of natural colonisation of a roof by new plant species (Brenneisen & Hänggi, 2006). English Nature published a report in 2003 that stated while individual green roofs offer local environmental benefits; any significant contribution to the wider environmental quality will only become apparent once a critical mass of urban roof space is greened (Grant, Engleback, & Nicholson, 2003). A 2009 study of a business/retail park in the Netherlands investigated the potential for a series of green roof islands as a means to negate the debilitating effect of size limitation. An increase in the local districts wildlife was recorded, with the reason being stipulated the green roofs were acting as areas of ecological sanctuary (Snepa, Van Ierland, & Opdama, 2009). The issues ecological viability on small green roofs will be further discussed later on in this report. A more general barrier to the creation of roof level artificial habitats is poor expectation and a lack of ambition in regard to the development of green roofs (Dunnett & Kingsbury, 2008). The UK construction industry currently possess no form of building control standards; high

Figure 15 ‐ Freezing Roof Vegetation

16

27

costs rates and a highly limited number of demonstration examples within the UK to provide confidence in the economic and environmental benefits of green roofs (Dunnett, 2006). These factors combine to create a limited appetite for the adoption of green roofs amongst the UK public (Earth Pledge, 2005). 1‐08 Green Roof Maintenance While a completely maintenance free green roof is an unachievable goal, extensive and semi‐extensive roofs generally require highly limited upkeep (White & Snodgrass, 2003). There are four aspects to green roof maintenance; feeding, plant protestation, drainage and weeding (Dunnett & Kingsbury, 2008). Plant nutrients and drainage has been previously discussed in this chapter. Pests and diseases are a minor problem form green roofs, partially because of the stress tolerant nature of typical planting. The principle risk is fungal diseases from an accumulation of tree leaves (Groundwork, 2011). More importantly, green roofs are highly susceptible to wind‐blown seeding and can be colonised by unwanted or invasive species. Care must be taken during weeding to insure tree and shrub seedlings, such as Birch and Willow, or annuals like corn or wheat do not become established as they can dominate other plants and damage the roof membrane (Dunnett & Kingsbury, 2008). 1‐09 Insulating Effects of Green Roofs Research has shown that green roofs are capable of delaying thermal influence and providing an insulating effect in cold temperatures. This effect remaining constant in substrate depths between 120mm and 300mm and is greatest in roofs with substrates over 400mm. It is important to note that green roofs are insignificant in effecting indoor air temperatures during summer temperature highs (Yoshimi & Altan, 2011). 1‐10 Benefits of Green Roof to the Urban Environments While individual green roofs will offer local environmental benefits, the advantages of green roofs can affect a large urban area if a significant proportion of roof space is greened, with some attributes of green roofs requiring a critical mass of greenery to be become apparent (Grant, Engleback, & Nicholson, 2003). Green Roofs and Heat Island Effect/Urban Air Quality/Carbon Sequestering The surface temperatures of green roofs are significantly less than those of conventional roofs during summer, and studies have shown that if a large area of a city’s roofs are greened they can reduce the ‘heat island effect’ (Skinner, 2006; Alexandri & Jones, 2008), this is the principle reason for development of green roofs in cities such as Tokyo (Tokyo Metropolitan Government, 2002) and Chicago (City of Chicago, 2010), these case studies will be further discussed in Chapter 4. This effect is due to the reduced heat reflectance from the surface of green roofs (Szokolay, 2008) and lower air temperatures because of the expiration of the planting (Skinner, 2006; Alexandri & Jones, 2008).

The ability of combining the respiration of plant to a buildings structure also directly influence the air quality and CO2 content of the surrounding urban area. The combined area

During the Penn State 2003 study, Gaffin and his collaborators measured the temperatures on both green and dark roofs. Both kinds of roofs warmed during the day and cooled overnight. While dark roofs cooled slightly more overnight, however, they warmed up much more during the day than their green counterparts. At their warmest, the dark roofs reached roughly 70oC, whereas the green roofs only reached about 40oC. (Gaffin, 2006). Table 4 ‐ Green Roof Summer Temperatures

17

28

of leaves from the numerous plant species found on typical green roofs creates a large surface area capable of filtering out dust, pollutants and some forms of airborne viruses (Doernach, 1979; Brookes, 1984). Furthermore there is growing evidence for the capacity of green roofs to act as carbon stores. Studies conducted on extensive green roofs in Michigan and Maryland; found that they were actively sequestered 375gC/m2 (Getter, Rowe, Robertson, Cregg, & Andresen, 2009). Green Roofs and Rainwater Retention The water retention rate of green roofs is one of the most researches aspects of green roofs and is one of the documented reasons for Berlin developing green roofs (Earth Pledge, 2005); this case study will again be discussed in Chapter 4. Lightweight moss and heather extensive roofs have a retention rate of 18L/m² (Optigreen, 2011), and a grass roof can hold 30‐80L/m² (Optigreen, 2011). Green roofs also reduce the immediate discharge of rainwater to 25% that of conventional roofs (Kӧhler, 1989). 1‐11 Green Roofs effect on People While this report is concentrated on issues regarding the biological effects of green roofs, in regards to Northern Ireland’s native flora and fauna, they also have a psychological and physiological impact on people. Numerous studies in hospitals, such as St. Luke’s Science Centre in Japan have shown a link between the calming effects between green plants can shorten patients’ recovery times (Earth Pledge, 2005). The introduction of planting to a building’s roof will reduce pollutants, dust particles and increase the humidity of air in a structure which has been proven to enhance people’s mood and physical responsiveness (Crowther, 1994) and cause a reduction in employee absenteeism as a result of “healthier” buildings (Keeping, 1996). A study of employee satisfaction in a building that with access to a green roof in the Netherlands; found that the majority of employees used (89%) and appreciated (92%) the space (Jókövi, Bervaes, & Böttcher, 2002). There are more subtitle psychological benefits of green roof planting, for example the increase signing of wildlife can be beneficial to people, especially to those in office blocks with regular feel a disconnection with the outside world (Coppin, 1990; Natural Economy Northwest, 2008). 1‐12 Habitats Favoured by Rooftop Environments The environmental conditions at roof level favour the application of a number of habitat treatments (Dunnett & Kingsbury, 2008). Elements associated with urban centres, such as relative differences in temperature and rain distribution when compared to rural area, places requirement on plant selection (Murray, McCann, & Cooper, 1992). The following habitats present qualities which are applicable to ecological specification on green roofs.

Plant species that are acclimatised to the shallow soil, scree slopes or rock faces of mountainous environments possess the potential to successful occupy a green roof (Dunnett, 2006). While rock face habitats may be slow to develop on rooftop, high altitude meadow wildflowers rapidly colonise north‐facing roof sections (Grant G. , 2006).

Mountainous Vegetation

Figure 17 ‐ Mountain Plain grasses and shrubs on Paul Lincke Ufer, Kreuzberg, Germany

18

29

Maritime and coastal habitats place a broad range of environmental stress on local vegetation. In order to survive in such ecosystems, plants must be capable of surviving in free‐draining sandy soil, be tolerance to situation of both drought and heavy wind exposure (CVNI, 2011). Additionally the continuous exposure to salt‐laden air has created plant species tolerant to airborne city pollutants (Dunnett & Kingsbury, 2008). The shallow soils that cover limestone slabs support a variety of grasses, mosses and shrubs. The limited space for root growth as well as grazing pressure often means that many plant species have become dwarfed (Northern Ireland Habitat Action Plan, 2005). A diverse range of stress‐tolerant vegetation has developed on limestone rich soils, resulting in an array of planting option for green roofs (White & Snodgrass, 2003). Habitats that exist in exposed locations have developed an array of low dense vegetation, in lowland situations these include drought‐tolerant shrubs and woody plants and grasses (Gates, 1980), and at higher latitudes heaths and mosses are abundant (Cooper & McCann, 2001). All of which are capable of populating rooftop environments. Because of the thin soil and exposed aspects of these habitats, their flora and fauna can rapidly adapt to condition on most green roofs (Brenneisen S. , 2006).

Vegetation that is capable of surviving the harsh temperature ranges and drought conditions of both natural and manmade arid environment are capable of existing unmodified at roof level (Larson, Matthes, Kelly, Lundholm, & Gerrath, 2004). Many of these habitats are dominated by one flora species and are adapted to exist in isolation, thusly are easily capable of be transplanted to a green roof setting (Dunnett & Kingsbury, 2008).

Providing a high water retention level at roof level it is possible to encourage the development of reeds and wetland grasses on green roofs. This habitat type has been exported to rooftops to meet a growing need of to conserve and clean water discharge in many regions (Earth Pledge, 2005). The minimal soil requirements and the ability to recycle nutrients in water runoff, results in the ability of flora and fauna that requires a permanent waterlogged environment to now exist on green roofs (Coffman & Davis, 2005).

Costal Vegetation

Figure 18 ‐ Costal Meadow grasses planted on the Nassau Icehouse Brewery

Limestone Vegetation

Figure 19 ‐ Grass sloped roof on the Vancouver Conference Centre

Shrub & Heath Vegetation

Figure 20 ‐ Heath Planting on Sloped Roof at Schiphol Plaza, Amsterdam Airport

Arid Vegetation

Figure 21 ‐ University Hospital Basel

Reed Bed Vegetation

Figure 22 ‐ John Deere Works, Mannheim

19

30

Northern Ireland and Green Roof Habitat Recreation The following table illustrates the explored connections between the habitats capable of surviving on green roofs and the requirements of natural habitats in Northern Ireland.

Habitats favoured by Green Roofs

Coastal Vegetation

Arid Vegetation

Reed Bed Vegetation




Northern Ireland habitats capable of addapting to Green

Roofs

Habitats Commonly Recreated on Green

Roofs

Habitats Promoted by Ease of

Construction and Financing

20

20

Chapter 2 Habitat Loss in Northern Ireland

21

21

The objective of this chapter is to examine the nature and extent of habitat loss in Northern Ireland. Additionally the attributes and properties of individual habitat categories located across Northern Ireland will be studied. The physical environment and microclimate associated with urban roof level locations present factors which the recreation of habitat will have to accommodate. The result of this will mean that some habitat types will never be capable of occupying a building’s roof because of the incapability with the environmental condition associated with green roofs. In addition to investigate the reasons for habitat loss in Northern Ireland, this chapter will explore the requirements, features and characteristics that classify each habitat as a unique ecosystem and each habitat type will be assess for there to potential to acclimatise in a green roof location. There are seven groupings for land based habitats in Northern Ireland, Coastal, Marine, Wetland, Woodland, Grassland, Heathland and Peatland. Each contains a number of specific ecosystems, with their own associated flora and fauna.

Additional agricultural and urban habitats will receive some analysis within this chapter, as they affect the quality of surrounding natural habitats. The fact that these habitats are artificially created or highly managed does not mean they are without ecological merit, agricultural (Countryside Survey, 2008) and urban (Gibson, 1998; Gedge & Kadas, 2005; Harvey, 2001) areas can support a diverse array of flora and fauna species, all be it limited when compared to natural habitats (Cooper, McCann, & Rogers, 2009). Urban ecology will be further discussed in Chapter 4. Agricultural and horticultural land represents the bulk of land use in Northern Ireland, encompassing 44% of the national landmass, with urban areas representing 5% of land use (Cooper, McCann, & Rogers, 2009).

Figure 1 ‐ Northern Ireland's Areas of Outstanding Natural Beauty (Countryside Survey, 2008)

22

22

2‐01 Tidal Marine Habitats The marine life off the coast of Northern Ireland is extremely rich and diverse. And the actions of the sea have a great impact on the habitats that are directly connected to the coastline (NIEA, 2010). The habitats associated with coastal tides are one of the most susceptible ecosystems to the affects of global warming and alterations to the seas. (Randall, 2004). The soil layer of these habitats provide for aquatic vegetation (Den Hartog, 1970) plus various species of worms, invertebrates, and isopods (National Museums Northern Ireland, 2010) all reliant on the saline environment. Many habitats also act as nursery regions for many fish species (CVNI, 2011). Because of the richness of aquatic life within tidal habitats, these areas have come to support a significant volume of bird species. The mudflats at Strangford Lough alone support over 70,000 birds annually (Northern Ireland Habitat Action Plan, 2003).Thank to this fact, Northern Ireland’s tidal seagrass zones represent an important resource in the diet of many nationally important species (Northern Ireland Habitat Action Plan, 2003). The principle habitats associated with marine tidal environments are: Tidal Sand/Shingle/Gravel Shores Tidal beaches and sandbanks that have developed in shelter section of the coastline (Northern Ireland Habitat Action Plan, 2005) Seagrass Beds Areas of shallow, sheltered tidal sediments that have been occupied by aquatic seagrass species (CVNI, 2011) Mudflats A intertidal habitat created by sedimentary deposition of low energy waves, particularly found in estuaries and other sheltered areas (Northern Ireland Habitat Action Plan, 2003) Saltmarshes Areas where vegetation has become established on tidal mudflats (Northern Ireland Habitat Action Plan, 2005) Saline Lagoon Bodies of seawater that have become disconnected from the sea (CVNI, 2011)

For more information on individual Tidal Marine Habitats, please see Appendix A

Tidal Shores Seagrass Beds

Figure 2 ‐ Dundrum Bay, Down Figure 3 ‐ Eelgrass, North Strangford Lough

Mudflats Saltmarshes

Figure 4 ‐ Millbay, Antrim Figure 5 ‐ Ballymacormick Point, Bangor

Saline Lagoon

Figure 6 ‐ Strand Lough, Down

23

23

While beach shores occur all along Northern Ireland’s coastline, other tidal habitats have a more limited range. Mudflats, Seagrass Beds and Saltmarshes all occupy in low energy coastal environments predominately along the eastern coast, in estuaries and sheltered areas such as sea loughs, (Northern Ireland Habitat Action Plan, 2003). Saline lagoons can be both naturally of artificially constructed and small brackish pools are frequent around the coast in saltmarshes, however large bodies of brackish water are rare (Bamber, Gilliland, & Shardlow, 2001). Rate of Habitat Loss No significant data exists on the rate of habitat gain/loss due to the changing nature of tidal habitats, with the exception for saltmarshes which is estimated to occupy a 250ha region, comprise 0.5% of the total UK habitat area (Northern Ireland Habitat Action Plan, 2005) The active threats and leading causes of tidal habitat loss in Northern Ireland are well documented (Northern Ireland Habitat Action Plan, 2005). These are listed below.

Figure 7 ‐ Northern Ireland's Marine Habitats (Countryside Survey, 2008)

Table 1 ‐ Leading Causes of Tidal Marine Habitat Loss

Causes of Habitat Loss Tida

l San

dy, Shingle

& Gravel Sho

res

Seagrass Bed

s

Mud

flats

Saltm

arshes

Salin

e Lago

on

Agricultural Improvement Climate Change Disease Fishing Activities Grazing Human Activities Human Construction Schemes Physical Disturbance Pollution Reclamation Reduction in Ground Quality Root Destruction Species Invasion

24

24

Ability to be recreated on a Green Roof Tidal Marine habitats present a series of problems when considered for relocation to a green roof setting. The principle issues are:

Green roofs which support freshwater wetland habitats are currently commercially available (Earth Pledge, 2005); any permanently waterlogged rooftop provides nutrients and minerals through a closed loop water circulation system (Coffman & Davis, 2005). Such a system could be adapted to utilise a saline water mixture.

Salt is corrosive to most building materials. While there are materials that are capable of withstanding salt exposure, this will add significant cost and maintenance requirements to any proposed green roof system (Deplazes, 2008).

The action of tidal forces to provide resource and shape marine coastal habitats is the principle feature of these environments (NIEA, 2010). From the aspect of habitat recreation, an alternative for the role played by costal tides does not exist (Gilbert & Anderson, 1998). This is means that no matter the success in recreating the water conditions, tidal habitats will not be practical on green roofs. An exception exists in regards to saline lagoons as this habitat type is not reliant on tidal forces. However issues of size and weight in relation of a static body of water needs to be addressed, these will be discussed in section 2‐03 on freshwater lakes.

Recreating a Costal Wetland Environment

Corrosive Nature of Brackish Water

Replicating the Actions of the Tide

Tidal Marine Habitats on Green Roofs

Incompatible Possible Highly Suitable

Tidal Sand/Shingle/Gravel Shores

Tidal habitats require a number of resources (Gilbert & Anderson, 1998) that would be impracticable or impossible to replicate on a green roof. For this reason tidal habitats are predominantly incompatible with green roofs (Dunnett & Kingsbury, 2008). However Saline lagoon habitats are possible, with the limiting factor of salt corrosion, and dead loading imposed by a large body of brackish water (Deplazes, 2008). It is important to note that green roof can act in a supporting role to tidal habitats as is the case with Ducks Unlimited National Headquarters and Conservation Centre in Winnipeg, Canada which acts as bird nesting ground around the Oak Hammond Marsh (Earth Pledge, 2005).

Seagrass Beds

Mudflats

Saltmarshes

Saline Lagoon

25

25

2‐02 Coastal Habitats Northern Ireland’s coastal regions are noted for their rich biodiversity. More than 75% of the coastline is protected by some form of international or national conservation order (NIEA, 2010). The Northern Ireland coastline is 650km in length supporting a wide diversity of natural environments and wildlife (NIEA, 2010). The flora and fauna found in habitats associated with coastal habitats can vary vastly over short distances; this is due the soil composition and local geography (Northern Ireland Habitat Action Plan, 2005). The physical differences between the coastal habitats of Northern Ireland are considerable, however their soil layers have a number of similarities, both being nutrient poor and have deficiencies in there supply of fresh water (Northern Ireland Habitat Action Plan, 2005). Nonetheless many coastal habitats support a diverse array of species. For example, the sand dunes at Dundrum, Co. Down supports 55 species of bees, ants and wasps, 213 species of moths and 21 species of butterflies (Northern Ireland Habitat Action Plan, 2005). And Northern Ireland’s cliffs are an important habitat for breeding seabirds, and support bird populations which are of international importance (CVNI, 2011). The principle habitats associated with costal environments are: Sand Dunes Sand dunes occur when a beach has the significant tidal power to allow sand to dry out complete. The dry sand is then blown landwards by the wind, where it accumulates into dunes (Northern Ireland Habitat Action Plan, 2005). Vegetated Shingles Banks Vegetable shingle banks occupy the landward side of shores when coastal areas have powerful tides that push singles and aggregate beyond the high tide mark (National Museums Northern Ireland, 2010). Cliffs and Slopes Consists of cliff top grassy meadows and vegetated scree slopes and cliff faces, but the vegetation on cliffs can vary vastly over short distances; this is due the soil composition and local geography (Northern Ireland Habitat Action Plan, 2005).

For more information on individual Coastal Habitats, please see Appendix A

Sand Dunes Vegetated Shingles

Figure 8 ‐ Murlough Dunes, Dundrum Bay Figure 9‐ Kearney, Down

Cliffs and Slopes

Figure 10 ‐ Carrick ‐a‐Rede Cliffs, Antrim

26

26

Figure 11 ‐ Northern Ireland's Coastal Habitats (Countryside Survey, 2008)

Sea cliffs occur all along the Northern Ireland coast and it is estimated that there is approximately 3000ha of sand dunes; with the area of vegetated sand dunes being between 1300ha and 1500ha (Northern Ireland Habitat Action Plan, 2005). With the largest dune systems located along the north and south‐east coasts, namely in north Antrim and South Down. (CVNI, 2011). Shingle banks are an incredibly rare habitat in Northern Ireland with an estimated extent of 50ha (Northern Ireland Habitat Action Plan, 2005). Rate of Habitat Loss Sea cliffs are one of the few natural habitats that have shown no significant habitat loss in recent years (Northern Ireland Habitat Action Plan, 2005), in fact the flora of sea cliffs are one of the few habitats that remain largely undamaged by modern human activities (National Museums Northern Ireland, 2010). And the range of coastal sand dunes has decreased by 2.4% or 1500ha between 1998 and 2007 (Cooper, McCann, & Rogers, 2009). Shingle banks have undergone the large decline of coastal habitats; between 1991 and 1998 a habitat loss of 32% (29ha) was recorded in Northern Ireland (Murray, McCann, & Cooper, 1992). The below table shows the leading causes of coastal habitat loss in Northern Ireland (Northern Ireland Habitat Action Plan, 2005)

Table 2 ‐ Leading Causes of Coastal Habitat Loss

Causes of Habitat Loss Sand

Dun

es

Shingles Ban

ks

Cliffs a

nd Slope

s

Agricultural Improvement Erosion Fall in Water Table Grazing Land Development Natural Erosion Recreational Activities Sea Defence Works Sediment Extraction Species Invasion

27

27

Ability to be recreated on a Green Roof Habitats associated with coastal locations possess a number of qualities which are attractive to their recreation on urban rooftop locations. The principle issues are:

The soil layers of costal habitats consist of free‐draining sandy or gravel soil which is typically nutrient poor (Northern Ireland Habitat Action Plan, 2005). Substrates of green roofs, especially those of lightweight extensive roofs, possess a similar soil structure as beach and cliff face environments (Dunnett & Kingsbury, 2008).

The vegetation of cliffs and aggregate shores already actively colonise urban areas, such as pavements, walls, roofs, and lawns (Lundholm & Marlin, 2006). Studies have shown that of the range of species that naturally occupy green roofs are disproportionately drawn from rocky and costal habitats (Brenneisen S. , 2006). The conditions of coastal location have created plant species which are high adapted to the conditions of towns and cities, such as limited and poor quality soil etc. (Dunnett & Kingsbury, 2008).

The typical topology and hard‐surface environment of urban areas reflect those of cliffs, slopes and exposed gravel flats found along Northern Ireland’s coasts (Grant G. , 2006). Additionally, the exposure to wind and temperature conditions in cities are similar to coastal habitats (Larson, Matthes, Kelly, Lundholm, & Gerrath, 2004).

Shallow Nutrient Poor Soils

Hardy Resilient Vegetation

Exposure to Weather Extremes

Coastal Habitats on Green Roofs Incompatible Possible Highly Suitable

Sand Dunes

The requirement of both flora and fauna to survive in exposed conditions on limited nutrients and water supply has created species that are predisposed to exist within the confines of a green roof (Gilbert & Anderson, 1998). Additional then ability of the habitat to be recreated on lightweight extensive green roofs will allow a wider range of building to support a recreated coastal habitat (Dunnett & Kingsbury, 2008).

Vegetated Shingles Banks

Cliffs and Slopes

28

28

2‐03 Freshwater and Wetland Habitats Northern Ireland has an extensive network of freshwater habitats, such as lakes, ponds and wetlands. There are more than 1,600 lakes in Northern Ireland, ranging in size from small ponds to Lough Neagh, the largest freshwater lake in the British Isles (NIEA, 2010). Also most of Northern Ireland’s lakes are fringed by fen, marsh and swamp; these wetlands provide countless benefit to local ecosystems. For example they help prevent flooding by slowing down and absorbing regional water sources and maintaining summer water flows by gradually release stored water to rivers and streams (NIEA, 2010). The areas surrounding lake habitats are important for non‐migratory bird species and international important populations of migratory wader and wildfowl species (CVNI, 2011).With reed beds and grazing marshes noted as containing a poor diversity in vegetation species, but support a rich array of fauna adapted to wetlands, notably breeding birds . All freshwater and wetland habitats are commonly rich with freshwater invertebrates and plants species, UK wide over 700 species of invertebrates are associated with reed beds and marshes (Northern Ireland Habitat Action Plan, 2005). The principle habitats associated with freshwater and wetland environments are: Eutrophic Waters Eutrophic standing water describes a body of water with a high nutrient content (nitrogen and phosphate). Most of Northern Ireland’s larger lakes such as Lough Neagh and Lough Beg and Lough Erne are regarded as eutrophic (Northern Ireland Habitat Action Plan, 2005). Mesotrophic Lakes Mesotrophic lakes are a body of water with a medium nutrient content. Both mesotrophic and eutrophic lakes support an overlapping body of flora and fauna species due to their similar chemical composition (Northern Ireland Habitat Action Plan, 2005). Marl Lakes Marl lakes are natural lakes which occur at low altitude and contain highly alkaline water Marl lake water bodies are characterised by very clear water but has a low nutrient status (Northern Ireland Habitat Action Plan, 2005). Reed Beds A wetland habitat that is dominated by Common Reeds and other tall flowering plants which are adapted to growing in wet conditions. Reed beds are widely distributed along the margins of water bodies, streams, river and other forms of wetlands and bogs (CVNI, 2011). Floodplain Grazing Marsh

Eutrophic Waters Mesotrophic Lakes

Figure 12 ‐ Upper Lough Erne Figure 13 ‐ Tower Lake, Newtownstewart

Marl Lakes Reed Beds

Figure 14 ‐ Knockballymore Lough, Fermanagh

Figure 15 ‐ Castle Espie, Down

Floodplain Marsh

Figure 16 ‐ Insh Marshes, Scotland

29

29

Wetland marshes characteristically connected to large slow‐moving rivers and lakes. Much of these habitats were formerly wet woodlands, fens or reed beds or redundant agricultural land that has flooded (Northern Ireland Habitat Action Plan, 2005).

The majority (72%) of Northern Ireland lakes have a surface area of less than 2ha and represent only 1.2% of the total water surface in Northern Ireland. The five largest lakes represent 89% of the total natural water volume of Northern Ireland (Northern Ireland Habitat Action Plan, 2005). Wetland habitats such as reed beds and grazing marshes are widely distributed along the margins of water bodies, streams, river and other forms of waterlogged environments such as fens and bogs. In Northern Ireland, they are especially associated with lowland areas around the large lakes and drumlins (Northern Ireland Habitat Action Plan, 2005). Rate of Habitat Loss The total extent of lakes and other bodies of freshwater within Northern Ireland is estimated at 940 km2 (Northern Ireland Habitat Action Plan, 2005). Between 1998 and 2007, there was a 1% reduction in the national extent of these habitats (CVNI, 2011). The rate of wetland habitat loss between 1998 and 2007 was more severe. The total are of wetland habitats within Northern Ireland is estimated at 47,255ha or 3% of Northern Ireland, this reduced by 10% between 1998 and 2007 (Cooper, McCann, & Rogers, 2009). The adjacent table shows the leading causes of freshwater and wetland habitat loss in Northern Ireland (Northern Ireland Habitat Action Plan, 2005)

For more information on these Habitats , please see Appendix A

Causes of Habitat Loss Eutrop

hic Waters

Mesotroph

ic Lakes

Marl Lakes

Reed

Bed

s

Floo

dplain M

arsh

Agricultural Activities Climate Change Drainage Discharge Dredging Forestation of Habitat Habitat Fragmentation Land Development Natural Habitat Evolution Nutrient Enrichment Pollution Poor Habitat Management Recreational Activities Sea Defence Species Invasion

Figure 17 ‐ Northern Ireland's Freshwater & Wetland Habitats (Countryside Survey, 2008)

Table 3 ‐ Leading Causes of Freshwater and Wetland Habitat Loss

30

30

Ability to be recreated on a Green Roof Freshwater and Wetland habitats present both challenges and opportunities of green roofs. The principle issues are:

While numerous examples of pond at roof level exists (Earth Pledge, 2005), the majority of freshwater bodies in Northern Ireland range between 1ha and 2ha (Northern Ireland Habitat Action Plan, 2005) this means that artificial freshwater bodies will never be large enough to support the flora and fauna associated with freshwater lakes (Gilbert & Anderson, 1998).

Artificial wetland habitat are currently commercial available and there exist a growing market for recreated wetland habitats on green roofs in continental Europe to aid in building cooling and rainwater discharge fees (Earth Pledge, 2005), this adoption of wetland green roof in Germany will be further discussed in chapter 3.

Large Water Bodies at Roof Level

Wetland Environment at Roof Level

Freshwater and Wetland Habitats on Green Roofs Incompatible Possible Highly Suitable

Eutrophic Waters

While artificial lakes are unlikely to be created at roof level, green roofs can provide habitats that will accommodate the flora and fauna associated with freshwater bodies. Again the example of Ducks Unlimited National Headquarters and Conservation Centre in Canada, described in section 2‐01, show cases this principle (Earth Pledge, 2005). The ability of green roofs to support freshwater lake habitats will be further discussed in chapter 3. Reed beds and wet grassland are currently being successfully implemented on green roofs (Coffman & Davis, 2005).

Mesotrophic Lakes

Marl Lakes

Reed Beds

Floodplain Grazing Marsh

31

31

2‐04 Woodland Habitats Northern Ireland is the least wooded country in Europe. The average coverage of woodland in Europe is 44%, in Northern Ireland it is only 6% of the total land area (NIEA, 2010). Native forests consist of broadleaf trees, such as are Alder, Downy Birch, Hazel, Ash, Oak, and Rowan (Northern Ireland Native Woodland Group, 2008). The annual loss of leafs promotes flora on the forest floor, such as woodland flowers (National Museums Northern Ireland, 2010). There are few examples of native woodland surviving in Northern Ireland, the best example are located in the nature reserves at Rostrevor in Down; Breen in Antrim; and Boorin Wood in Tyrone (National Museums Northern Ireland, 2010). Modern commercial forests are planted with non‐native species, such as conifers, which provide good habitat opportunities for some species, for instance the red squirrels and hen harrier but are not as biologically diverse as semi‐natural woodland (NIEA, 2010). Woodlands are not limited to one soil condition and are capable of developing on nutrient rich, mineral based, acidic or nutrient‐poor peat soils (Northern Ireland Habitat Action Plan, 2005). Many habitats will transition from their existing state to shrub land, and finally woodland if left to naturally evolve. Forestation is sited cause of habitat loss for wetland, grassland, heath and bog ecosystems (Cooper, McCann, & Rogers, 2009), as mention in other sections of this chapter. The principle habitats associated with woodland environments are: Wet Woodlands An assortment of woodland and scrubs which occupy seasonally flooded or waterlogged land (Northern Ireland Habitat Action Plan, 2005) Mixed Ashwood Forests located on base rich soils, generally dominant by Ash species, typically accompanied by Oak, Downy Birch and Hazel (Northern Ireland Habitat Action Plan, 2005) Oakwood Woodland dominated by native Oaks supported by smaller tree species such as Holly, Rowan and Hazel (Northern Ireland Habitat Action Plan, 2005).

The total extent of native broadleaf woodlands in Northern Ireland is estimated at 81,699ha or fewer than 6% of the total land area (Cooper, McCann, & Rogers, 2009). The area of broadleaf forests in Northern Ireland currently outmatches that of introduced conifer forests, by 21,000ha (Cooper, McCann, & Rogers, 2009).

For more information on individual Woodland Habitats, please see Appendix A

Native Woodlands Wet Woodlands

Figure 18 ‐ Belvoir Park Forest, Belfast Figure 19 ‐ Bonds Glen, Derry

Mixed Ashwood Oakwood

Figure 20 ‐ Glenarm Woodlands, Antrim Figure 21 ‐ Breen Oakwood, Antrim

32

32

Wet woodlands occur across Northern Ireland in scattered locations, at areas typically 3‐5ha. Recent estimates place the extent of wet woodlands to occupy an area of 2,600ha (Northern Ireland Habitat Action Plan, 2005). Ashwood forests occupy the basalts regions of Antrim, the limestone basins of Fermanagh, and sites in the Sperrins and County Down and Armagh, with an estimated range of 3,430ha, (Northern Ireland Habitat Action Plan, 2005). Northern Ireland’s oak woodlands are concentrated in the north east, in rocky and wet areas with slightly base soil (CVNI, 2011), their extent is estimated at 2,350ha (Northern Ireland Habitat Action Plan, 2005). Rate of Habitat Loss Between 1998 and 2007 a 9% increase in both wet woodland and mixed ash wood habitats was recorded, and an 11% increase in the area of oak forests throughout Northern Ireland (Northern Ireland Habitat Action Plan, 2005). Over the same period a reduction of 2% was seen in Conifer forests (Cooper, McCann, & Rogers, 2009). The total area of broadleaf forests in Northern Ireland increase by nearly 29% between 1998 and 2007, the second largest expansion of land use in Northern Ireland during this period, surpassed only by housing which increased by 30% (Cooper, McCann, & Rogers, 2009). As mentioned earlier in this section, forestation is cited as a cause of habitat loss rather than succumbing to it (NIEA, 2010). The below table shows the leading treats to woodland habitats in Northern Ireland, however as stated broadleaf forests have shown strong growth in recent years (Northern Ireland Habitat Action Plan, 2005)

Table 4 ‐ Leading Causes of Woodland Habitat Loss

Causes of Habitat Loss Wet W

oodlan

ds

Mixed

Ashwoo

d

Oakwoo

d

Air Pollution Climate Change Deforestation Disease Fall in Water Table Grazing Habitat Fragmentation Illegal Dumping Nutrient Enrichment Poor Habitat Management Poor Water Quality Species Invasion

Figure 22 ‐ Northern Ireland's Woodland Habitats (Countryside Survey, 2008)

33

33

Ability to be recreated on a Green Roof Woodland habitats require a number of important issues to be addressed if they are to be recreated within a green roof environment. The principle issues are:

The root depth requirement of certain tree species can be significant (Gilbert & Anderson, 1998). While substrate depths of 500mm to over a metre are recommended depending on tree species, method of using root balls and plastic strapping to induce dwarfism in planted trees are commonly required (GreenRoof, 2010). Unfortunately the reduce root area increase the maintenance, water and nutrient requirements of the green roof (Earth Pledge, 2005), as described during chapter 1.

The addition of tree species to a green roof will impose a considerable extra load on a buildings structure (Gilbert & Anderson, 1998). A building will have to support in excess of 1000kg/m2 (Earth Pledge, 2005), a requirement which while achievable, is grossly beyond typical roof loading requirements (Adler, 1999). Meeting the requirements of a tree’s weight will add additional cost and possibly require structural strengthening if trees are included in retrofitted green roofs (GreenRoof, 2010). In addition to placing a practical limit on the size of planted trees (Dunnett & Kingsbury, 2008).

Shallow Soil and Root Depth

Weight of Mature Trees

Woodland Habitats on Green Roofs Incompatible Possible Highly Suitable

Wet Woodlands

Example of trees plant on green roofs currently exist (Earth Pledge, 2005; GreenRoof, 2010) and will be discussed in detail during chapter 3. However these examples also show the limitations of planting such large scale vegetation at roof level.

Mixed Ashwood

Oakwood

34

34

2‐05 Grassland Habitats Grasslands are the most abundant habitat types in Northern Ireland; agriculture grassland encompasses almost 60% of the land area of Northern Ireland (NIEA, 2010). Native grasslands are less agriculturally productive than managed land and are generally restricted to low value upland areas, which typically consist of waterlogged and thinner soils. The natural grasslands of Northern Ireland are dependent on low intensity domestic livestock occupation or traditional farming practices to preserve their diversity of short and slow growing and flowering grasses (NIEA, 2010). Grasslands are area heavily dominated by herbs and fine‐leaved grasses with a lack of tall vegetation such as trees, shrubs and other dense bushes or bracken species (Northern Ireland Habitat Action Plan, 2005). With local fauna comprising principally of invertebrates such as butterflies and beetle species. Grasslands support a less diverse range of vertebrate species than other habitats described in this chapter, but are occupying but nationally important colonies of Irish Hare and Skylark (CVNI, 2011). The principle habitats associated with grassland environments are: Lowland Dry Acid Grasslands Occurring on nutrient poor, free draining soils which are based on acid rocks or shallow deposits of sands and gravels (NIEA, 2010) Calcareous Grasslands Species‐rich grassland occurring on shallow, lime rich soils the majority of which derive from chalk and limestone rocks (Northern Ireland Habitat Action Plan, 2005) Lowland Meadows Areas of unfertilised grassland who’s soil layers consist of well drained mineral soil, supporting a rich variety of herbs with few tall plant species (Northern Ireland Habitat Action Plan, 2005) Purple Moor‐grass & Rush Pasture Occur on poorly drained, usually acidic soils in lowland areas exposed to high rainfall (Northern Ireland Habitat Action Plan, 2005) Limestone Pavements Areas of exposed limestone stable which support grass species and plants adapted to rocky habitats (Northern Ireland Habitat Action Plan, 2005)

For more information on individual Woodland Habitats, please see Appendix A

Lowland Acid Grasslands Calcareous Grasslands

Figure 23 ‐ Wangford Warren, Suffolk Figure 24 ‐ Little Deer Park, Antrim

Lowland Meadows Rush Pastures

Figure 25 ‐ Tees Valley, Middlesbrough Figure 26 ‐ Slievenacloy, Belfast Hills

Limestone Pavements

Figure 27 ‐ Knockmore, Fermanagh

35

35

Natural grasslands occur across all of Northern Ireland, commonly located on land with low agricultural value (NIEA, 2010). Lowland dry acid grasslands area rare and highly scattered, concentrated in County Down and Armagh (Cooper, McCann, & Rogers, 2009) and limestone pavement are restricted to west Fermanagh (CVNI, 2011). The remaining grassland habitats are located across County Down, Antrim, Derry and Tyrone, with the plains of Armagh and south Fermanagh dominated by commercial agriculture land (Countryside Survey, 2008). Rate of Habitat Loss Between 1998 and 2007 an extensive reduction in all natural grassland habitats was recorded, losing 12.5% of their area. The only exception is calcareous grasslands which seen a 2% increase (Cooper, McCann, & Rogers, 2009). Many types of grassland are reliant on the implementation of low‐intensity grazing to prevent the re‐colonisation of a region from shrubs and woodland (Corbett, 2003). Forestation and the loss of land to housing development and other building projects are cited as the leading causes of habitat loss for all grasslands. The table below presents the principle reason for grassland habitat loss in Northern Ireland (Northern Ireland Habitat Action Plan, 2005)

Figure 28 ‐ Northern Ireland's Grassland Habitats (Countryside Survey, 2008)

Table 5 ‐ Leading Causes of Grassland Habitat Loss

Causes of Habitat Loss Dry Ac

id Grassland

Calcareo

us Grassland

Lowland

Meado

ws

Purple M

oor‐Grass

Limestone

Pavem

ent

Agricultural Improvement Airborne Pollutants Climate Change Forestation of Habitat Grazing Habitat Fragmentation Human Activities Land Development Land Infilling Natural Erosion Poaching Poor Habitat Management Quarrying Recreational Activities

36

36

Ability to be recreated on a Green Roof Grass covered roofs have a long history of usage as a building treatment (Dunnett & Kingsbury, 2008), because of this the requirements for grasses to successfully occupy rooftops are comprehensively understood (Oberndorfer, et al., 2007). The following are the primary issue in regards to the simulating natural grassland habitats on rooftops.

The variation in soil composition of natural grasslands is considerable, ranging from acidic gravels to lime‐rich soils (NIEA, 2010). However because of the experiences of the ecological roofing and the horticulture industry with creating grass dominated environments, the soil condition for all grassland habitats can be replicated within artificial roof ecosystems, provided the correct systems are implemented (Blythe & Merhaut, 2007).

The most popular planting species for green roofs are variants of sedum, grasses, herbs and mosses (Emilsson, 2003). Commercial grass seeds are abundant on both the construction and landscaping markets (White & Snodgrass, 2003). As introduce of alien species to a is regarded as a leading degrading factor to natural grassland, recreated grassland habitats on rooftops must take measures to restrict the planting of unwanted flora (Dunnett & Kingsbury, 2008).

Because of the importance of low level grazing to maintain the diversity and health of a natural grassland (NIEA, 2010), a similar intensity of habitat maintenances will need to be replicated when a grassland ecosystem is relocated to roof level. Maintenance requirements, as described in chapter 1, will need to be considered when installing a grass roof (Frith & Gedge, 2000).

Numerous studies and built examples have shown that both flora and fauna species can readily colonise green roofs if the roof micro‐climate replicate there natural environment (Brenneisen S. , 2006). This factor in combination with the adaptability of urban vegetation (Larson, Matthes, Kelly, Lundholm, & Gerrath, 2004) can result in a grass roof being invaded by more resilient plant species (Landolt, 2001). This issue will be discussed further in chapter 3.

Soil Requirements

Species Selection

Habitat Management Requirements

Micro‐climate, Exposure and Natural Plant Colonisation

Grassland Habitats on Green Roofs Incompatible Possible Highly Suitable

Lowland Dry Acid Grassland

The creation of grass environments on roofs is a mature building process (Dunnett & Kingsbury, 2008). And the establishment of habitats that replicate natural grasslands is limited only local conditions and design ability (White & Snodgrass, 2003).

Calcareous Grassland

Lowland Meadow

Purple Moor & Rush Pasture

Limestone Pavement

37

37

2‐06 Heathland Habitats The heaths of Northern Ireland have a wide habitat range; common to high mountain regions but also extend to lowland and coastal areas. The common characteristic of all heathlands is that that are based on nutrient‐poor, heavily mineralised soils and thin peat (NIEA, 2010). Heathlands are an internationally rare and threatened habitat, and the total UK habitat range represents a significant proportion of the global resource (Northern Ireland Habitat Action Plan, 2003). Heaths provide opportunities for numerous mosses, mountain grasses and heathers which have evolved in wetland and blanket bog species, in addition to a verity of dwarf shrubs and conifer trees (Northern Ireland Habitat Action Plan, 2003). But are categorised as being lower in flora diversity other ecosystems described in this chapter, due to the underlying soil, however are commonly occupied by a diverse range of insects and other invertebrate species (NIEA, 2010). Endangered vertebrate species such as the Irish Hare and ground nesting birds like the Curlew, Chough, Red Grouse, Hen Harrier and Skylark all rely on heaths as are feed and breeding grounds (NIEA, 2010). The principle habitats associated with heathland environments are: Lowland Heaths Heathland that are situated below the upper altitude limit of cost effective agricultural practices, this is generally below 300m (Northern Ireland Habitat Action Plan, 2003) Upland Heaths Reside above the altitude limit of the majority of Northern Ireland’s farms, typically between 300m and 600m, the habitat is based upon thin mineral or peat soil, usually with substrates layers less than 0.5m deep (NIEA, 2010) Mountainous Heaths Northern Ireland is the southern extreme of the natural range for montane or alpine heath habitats. These heaths occur widely in the Highlands of Scotland at altitudes over 600m, above the natural tree line (NIEA, 2010).

Heathland habitats tend to be highly fragmented and restricted to small areas (NIEA, 2010). Lowland and Upland heaths have a largely confined range, occupying the slopes of the Mourne Mountains, the Ring of Gullion, Rathlin Island and narrow coastal strips in Down, Antrim and western Fermanagh (NIEA, 2010). The estimated 5,000ha of lowland heaths are general linked fens, dominating areas of Down and Armagh (Cooper, McCann, &

For more information on individual Heathland Habitats, please see Appendix A

Figure 32 ‐ Northern Ireland's Heathland Habitats (Countryside Survey, 2008)

Lowland Heaths Upland Heaths

Figure 29 ‐ Murlough National Nature Reserve Figure 30 ‐ Bloody Bridge near Newcastle

Mountainous Heaths

Figure 31 ‐Mourne Mountains

38

38

Rogers, 2009). Mountainous heaths are limited to the highest summits of the Mourne Mountains and the Sperrin Mountains, as Northern Ireland is the southernmost example of this habitat internationally (NIEA, 2010). Rate of Habitat Loss Because of the high elevation, poor soils quality and harsh climate of Northern Ireland’s heaths, these habitats are not heavily threatened by encroaching farming land (Northern Ireland Habitat Action Plan, 2003). However heaths have been targeted as areas of building and infrastructure development, resulting in extensive habitat loss (CVNI, 2011). The development of forests on commercially low value heathland is another leading cause of habitat loss (NIEA, 2010). Also climate change is cited as a leading cause of mountainous heaths, this is exasperated by the habitat being at its southern extent in Northern Ireland (NIEA, 2010). The impact of climate change is Northern Ireland is predicted to be much smaller than in Britain and will have a less significant impact on local habitats (Coll, Maguire, & Sweeney, 2009). The Northern Ireland Countryside Survey has estimated that lowland heaths have lost 11% of its total area between 1992 and 1998. Considerable losses in upland heaths areas have occurred during the same period, an estimated 20% of wet upland heaths, and 28% of dry upland heaths (Cooper, McCann, & Rogers, 2009). The below table lists the leading treats to heathland habitats in Northern Ireland (Northern Ireland Habitat Action Plan, 2003) Ability to be recreated on a Green Roof Heaths exhibit a number of attributes that are applicable to green roofs, due to their geographical and environmental requirements to develop (NIEA, 2010).The principle issues are:

Heather and mosses dominated areas have high water retention capabilities (NIEA, 2010), this ability to retain moisture and the variations in water levels across a small area has been shown to aid in creating a diverse range of flora and fauna species on green roofs (Brenneisen S. , 2006). As describe in chapter 1.

Mixture of Waterlogged and Dry Soil Conditions

Table 6 ‐ Leading Causes of Heathland Habitat Loss

Causes of Habitat Loss Lowland

Heaths

Uplan

d He

aths

Mou

ntaino

us Heaths

Agricultural Improvement Climate Change Fires Forestation of Habitat Grazing Land Development Natural Erosion Nutrient Enrichment Recreational Activities Species Invasion

39

39

The exclusive use of a single plant species or group of related species is a hallmark of lightweight extensive green roofs (Dunnett & Kingsbury, 2008). A common planting method is to utilise vegetation mats, where dense groundcover species are combines with a non‐organic fibres which mimics organic materials (Hitchmough, 1994), as discussed in chapter 1. The most common commercial species are sedum; however the technology can easily be applies to moss and heather planting (Cooper & McCann, 2001), creating a cheap system of recreating heathland habitats.

The ability of heathland to thrive in exposed and isolated environments (Northern Ireland Habitat Action Plan, 2003) makes this habitat ideal for relocation to roof top environments. The micro‐climate condition of the majority of rooftops in Northern Ireland (Dunnett N. , 2006) replicates the natural environmental conditions of natural heather habitats (Gates, 1980).

Predominantly Monoculture Vegetation

Fragmented and High Altitude Locations

Heathland Habitats on Green Roofs Incompatible Possible Highly Suitable

Lowland Heaths

Heathland habitats support lightweight tolerant ground vegetation which is accustomed to shallow slightly acidic soils (NIEA, 2010). The predominant form of green roofs construction in the UK, prefabricated vegetation mats (Emilsson, 2003); present an opportunity for an existing technology to be use for habitat recreation (Grant G. , 2006).

Upland Heaths

Mountainous Heaths

40

40

2‐07 Peatland Habitats Peatlands are areas of waterlogged soil containing a high quantity of organic matter, which has accumulated over thousands of years. The laying down of peat is an ongoing process at approximately 1cm every 10 years (NIEA, 2010). The types of bog land which develops depend on a variety of local environmental and geographical conditions, such as climate, soil type and typology (NIEA, 2010). The climate of Northern Ireland provides the ideal climate conditions for peat formation, due to high rainfall, cool summers and high atmospheric humidity (Northern Ireland Habitat Action Plan, 2003). Blanket bogs in Ireland, represent 8% of the world’s total habitat area (CVNI, 2011). Naturally peatlands support a variety of highly specialist plants, many of which are national priority species. The most abundant vegetation includes Sphagnum Bog Mosses and other plants adapted to waterlogged conditions (CVNI, 2011). Also the waterlogged conditions of peatland habitats are ideally situated for flora and fauna species which posses an aquatic phase in their life cycle, such as dragonflies. Invertebrates such as beetles, moths and dragonflies are better adapted to bog land environments, with few mammal species, apart from the Irish Hare, Red Deer, Foxes and the Pigmy Shrew, permanently residing within peatlands (NIEA, 2010). Additionally the lack of predators and human disturbance makes peatlands an idyllic environment for wading and nesting bird species such as the Skylark (Northern Ireland Habitat Action Plan, 2003). The principle habitats associated with peatland environments are: Lowland Raised Bog The gradually filling of shallow lakes to create peat based ecosystems, located primarily in altitudes below 150m and are characteristically are surrounded by mineral based soils (Northern Ireland Habitat Action Plan, 2003) Blanket Bog Bog lands which develop in response to the very slow rate at which plant material decomposes under waterlogged conditions, and have the ability to cover an entire landscape (Northern Ireland Habitat Action Plan, 2003) Fens Peatlands that receive the majority of their water and nutrients from ground water sources and naturally occur in river valleys and poorly drained basins. Are generally considered the starting form of lowing raised bogs (Northern Ireland Habitat Action Plan, 2005)

For more information on individual Peatland Habitats, please see Appendix A

Lowland Raised Bog Blanket Bog

Figure 33 ‐ Fairy Water Bogs, Tyrone Figure 34 ‐ Cuilcagh Mountain, Fermanagh

Fens

Figure 35 ‐ Corbally Fen, Down

41

41

Bogs and fen occur throughout Northern Ireland (CVNI, 2011). Lowland raised bogs are concentrated around the drumlins of the Fermanagh lowlands and raised bogs more widespread in the northwest of Northern Ireland, around the Antrim Plateau (Northern Ireland Habitat Action Plan, 2003). Fens are similarly spread across Northern Ireland, typically associated with wetlands and lakes (CVNI, 2011). Rate of Habitat Loss Relatively few areas of peatland in Northern Ireland have remained unaffected by human activities, of the 160902ha (Cooper, McCann, & Rogers, 2009) of bog land only 15% has remained intact; with drainage for agriculture effecting 10% and 46% be cut for fuel (Northern Ireland Habitat Action Plan, 2003). Compared to the degradation of bogs the total loss of habitat is relatively small, with only a 2% reduction in area between 1998 and 2007 (Cooper, McCann, & Rogers, 2009). The peat industry is the principle cause of habitat loss, particularly in lowland raised bogs as they are more accessible than blanket bogs (Northern Ireland Habitat Action Plan, 2003).

Fens have similarly suffered with a decrease in territory of 18% (484ha) between 1988 and 1998 (Cooper, McCann, & Rogers, 2009), with forestation and invasion of shrubs being the leading causes of habitat loss (Northern Ireland Habitat Action Plan, 2003). The adjacent table lists the primary contributor to peatland habitat loss in Northern Ireland (Northern Ireland Habitat Action Plan, 2003).

Causes of Habitat Loss Lowland

Raised Bo

g

Blan

ket B

og

Fens

Agricultural Improvement Climate Change Drainage Fires Forestation of Habitat Grazing Illegal Dumping Land Development Land Infill Natural Erosion Nutrient Enrichment Peat Cutting Peat Milling Pollution Recreational Activities Shrub‐land Encroachment Soil Mineral Leaching

Figure 36 ‐ Northern Ireland's Peatland Habitats (Countryside Survey, 2008)

Table 7 ‐ Leading Causes of Peatland Habitat Loss

42

42

Ability to be recreated on a Green Roof Peatland present a number of challenges in term of recreation, whether by traditional means or on green roofs, because of their unique geology and chemical makeup (NIEA, 2010).The principle issues are:

Recreation of waterlogged environments which is dominated by reed beds flora is an existing roofing method, common in Germany (Earth Pledge, 2005) and will be further discussed in chapter 3. An acidic wetland ecosystem is possible with the appropriate water systems.

Bogs and Fens support a diverse array of insect species, several of which are extinct or threatened outside of Northern Ireland (CVNI, 2011). Invertebrates (in addition to birds) have been shown to highly adaptable to relocation and spontaneously colonising green roof that mirror their natural habitats (Dunnett & Kingsbury, 2008; Brenneisen S. , 2006), as described in the previous chapter and will be expanded upon in chapter 3. Green roofs are capable of support the majority of peatland fauna in addition to flora species (Brenneisen S. , 2006).

Peat soil is an acid waterlogged substance, high in organic material (NIEA, 2010), both lowland raised bog and blanket bogs are commonly milling for peat as it is a common soil nutrient in the horticulture industry (Northern Ireland Habitat Action Plan, 2003). It would be unsustainable to propose the creation of bog habitats, if natural peatland will be consumed in the production of commercial acidic soil (Gilbert & Anderson, 1998). While there are alternative methods of creating acidic substrates with high concentrations of organic materials using municipal solid waste (MSW) compost and dry sewage sludge, this a immature horticultural systems (Ingelmo, Canet, Ibañez, Pomares, & García, 1998).

Waterlogged Environment

Invertebrate Dominated Fauna

Soil Makeup

Peatland Habitats on Green Roofs Incompatible Possible Highly Suitable

Lowland Raised Bog

The inability to sustainably replicate the soil condition of peatlands will negate any benefits of producing bog and fen habitats on Northern Ireland’s roofs. Again green roof can be considered as supporting habitats for bog species, such as the wetland habitat on created on the BMW Düsseldorf Office Building (GreenRoof, 2010) , which will be further discussed in chapter 3.

Blanket Bog

Fens

43

43

2‐08 Rate of Habitat Change While the threat to individual habitat types has been discuss under each habitat segment. The primary cause of habitat loss through Northern Ireland is human activities, principally due to converting land to agricultural use and the expansion of rural settlements (NIEA, 2002). The rate of new rural structure being constructed doubled between 1998 and 2007, with predominantly lowland habitats being consumed by such developments. These habitats where typically small semi‐natural grasslands which were part of larger habitat mosaics (Cooper, McCann, & Rogers, 2009). Other common reasons of habitat loss or transition were the expansion of woodland and shrub habitats into open exposed lands, outcompeting local vegetation (Cooper, McCann, & Rogers, 2009).Climate change was universally sited as a future concern with the annual rainfall predicted to increase by 3‐5% by the 2050s and temperatures increase by 0.7OC to 2.6OC in Northern Ireland (NIEA, 2002). The table below describes the rate of habitat loss/gain in Northern Ireland between 1998 and 2007 (Cooper, McCann, & Rogers, 2009)

Table 8 ‐ Rate of Habitat Change in Northern Ireland (Cooper, McCann, & Rogers, 2009)

Habitat Type ha % of N.I. Habitat Change Between 1998‐2007

ha % Change

Coastal Habitats Costal Rock 1581 0.11 +18193 +28.65Costal Sediment 1995 0.14 ‐1518 ‐2.44Freshwater and Wetland Habitats Standing Open Water 61332 4.33 ‐453 ‐0.73Rivers & Streams 5495 0.39 +105 +1.96Wetland, Marsh & Fen 47255 3.34 ‐5680 ‐10.73Woodland Habitats Broadleaved/Mixed & Yew Woods 81699 5.77 +18193 +28.65Coniferous Woodland 60617 4.28 ‐1518 ‐2.44Grassland Habitats Neutral Grassland 231116 16.32 ‐32786 ‐12.42Calcareous Grassland 1802 0.13 +37 +2.12Acid Grassland 10369 0.73 ‐2954 ‐22.18Heathland Habitats Heath (Dwarf shrub) 16751 1.18 +2842 +20.43Bracken ‐ Dense 2645 0.19 ‐439 ‐14.25Peatland Habitats Bog 160902 11.36 ‐3314 ‐2.02Agricultural Habitats Improved Grassland 573010 40.47 +18028 +3.25Arable and Horticulture 48917 3.46 ‐8295 ‐14.50Highland Habitats Mountainous 735 ‐ ‐ ‐ Inland Rock 5450 0.39 ‐2520 ‐31.62Urban Habitats Urban/Built up Areas 74098 5.23 +17251 +30.35Roads / Tracks & Hard Embankments 30951 2.19 +1503 +5.10Total 1415986

44

44



Coastal Vegetation

Arid Vegetation

Reed Bed Vegetation





Roofs

Tidal Marine HabitatsSaline Lagoon

Coastal Habitats Sand Dunes

Vegetated Shingles BanksCliffs and Slopes

Wetland Habitats Reed Beds


Woodland Habitats

Wet WoodlandsMixed Ashwood

Oakwood

Grassland Habitats

Lowland Dry Acid GrasslandCalcareous GrasslandLowland Meadow

Purple Moor & Rush PastureLimestone Pavement

Heathland Habitats Lowland HeathsUpland Heaths

Mountainous Heaths

Peatland Habitats

Lowland Raised BogBlanket Bog

Fens


Roofs



45

45

Chapter 3 Green Roofs and Created Habitats

46

46

A wealth of research data exists that supports the perception that green roofs in heavily built up areas can support a relatively diverse level of flora and fauna species (Köhler, 2006). The purpose of this chapter is to present examples of completed green roofs, which demonstrates the scope of habitat that have been created on green roofs and illustrate the value a successful green roof can have on the surrounding ecology. The specific construction details of green roofing systems and whether they complement or clash with the equivalent natural environment shall be discussed. The table below show the range of natural habitats in Northern Ireland that have the potential to be replicated on green roofs.

Each section of this chapter will examine existing attempts to recreate a specify habitat, these examples will be assessed on their cost, structural makeup and ecological impact. The aim of this undertaking is to refine the list of Northern Ireland habitats which can exist on a rooftop to those which are practical to replicate on green roofs. The finding of this chapter, in addition to previous chapters will provide material for the discussion of whether green roofs can play a role in habitat preservation in chapter 4.

Figure 1 ‐ Chicago City Hall

Table 1 ‐ Habitats Capable of Existing on Green Roofs (Author)

Northern Ireland Habitats which can be readily adapted to Green Roofs Coastal Habitats

Sand Dunes Vegetated Shingles Banks Cliffs and Slopes

Wetland Habitats

Reed Beds Floodplain Grazing Marsh

Grassland Habitats Lowland Dry Acid Grassland Calcareous Grassland Lowland Meadow Purple Moor & Rush Pasture Limestone Pavement

Heathland Habitats

Lowland Heaths Upland Heaths Mountainous Heaths

Northern Ireland Habitats that can be created on Green Roofs with additional Considerations Marine Habitats

Saline Lagoon Woodland Habitats

Wet Woodlands Mixed Ashwood

Peatland Habitats Lowland Raised Bog Blanket Bog Fens

47

47

3‐01 Sand Dunes / Shingles Banks Habitat Case Studies Flat gravel roofs are a common roof typology within many urban centres; the material makeup of such roof already shows some similarities with many coastal environments. The free‐draining sandy and gravel covering presents environmental conditions, such as periods of drought and heavy wind exposure (Grant, 2006), which are common to sand dunes and shingles banks (CVNI, 2011).

As mentioned in section 1‐12, the stress tolerance vegetation associated with coastal locations is ideal for rooftop occupation (Dunnett & Kingsbury, 2008). The lack of complex soil layer in sand and shingle beach heads (National Museums Northern Ireland, 2010) also means that it is possible to construct artificial soil which have the capability of mimicking organic beach material (Hitchmough, 1994). This presents opportunities to reduce the need for the removal of natural sand or gravel soils in habitat recreation projects. Recent field research into how plant species spontaneously colonized urban areas and habitats (such as pavements, walls, roofs, lawns and roofs) originate disproportionately from coastal and rocky habitats (Lundholm & Marlin, 2006).

An important example of a green roof working to support coastal dunes and beach heads is the National Trust Visitor Centre at Portstewart Strand. A building designed by Donnelly O’Neill Architects is located next to a two mile stretch of protected beach and sand dunes. The green roof is a 400m2 extensive sedum roof, which is expected to be colonised by local dune grass in the future (GreenRoof, 2010).This project is one of the few attempts of habitat recreation at roof level in Northern Ireland.

Figure 4 ‐ National Trust Visitor Centre,Portstewart Strand

Sand Dunes

Figure 2 ‐ Murlough Dunes, Dundrum Bay

Vegetated Shingles

Figure 3‐ Kearney, Down

48

48

Sechelt Justice Services Centre

The Sechelt Justice Services Centre is located adjacent to the Pacific Ocean in British Columbia and is an example of a low‐impact, site‐specific roof design. The roof was developed to replace the coastal dune meadow that was consumed during the building process, mimicking the local soil conditions and optimise the exposure to sunlight and prevailing winds. The roof is populated by native costal grass species and selected non‐native plants such as sedum, mosses and herbs (Earth Pledge, 2005). Significance to Northern Ireland Habitat Replication The construction method utilised by the Sechelt Justice Services Centre shows promise for the recreation of sand dunes / shingles banks habitats here in Northern Ireland.

The roofing systems use a lightweight structure that is within the structural tolerances of the majority of Northern Irelands buildings (Adler, 1999).

An artificial soil substrate supports coastal grasses, using pumice rock and plant nutrient supplements.

A mixture of native grasses and alien mosses and herbs are planted on the rooftop. The mixture of native/non‐native species on Northern Ireland rooftops will have to be done in conjunction with the appropriate Northern Ireland Habitat Action Plan and the national Biodiversity Action Plan (Northern Ireland Habitat Action Plan, 2005).

Location Sechelt, Canada Completion Date 2003 Client District of Sechelt Architect Johnston Davidson Landscape Architect Sharp & Diamond New Build/Retrofit New Green Roof Type Extensive Roof Size 465m2 Roof Coverage 40% Soil Medium 60% Black Pumice

and 40% Soil Amendment

Soil Depth 75mm Cost £46/m2 Weight 73.2kg/m2

49

49

University Hospital of Basel

While every building in Basel hospital complex has a green roof, only the roof of Clinic One was specially designed as a test site for urban bird habitat creation. The roof is covered with sandy loam and gravel from the nearby riverbank, shaped into small hills and perches that are the preferred train of insect‐hunting birds (Earth Pledge, 2005). The green roof has become frequented by an unexpected range of bird species; Black Redstarts, Wagtails, Rock Doves and House Sparrows (typically mountainous, rural species) dominate the roofscape, with common urban species rarely observed. Studies has have proposed that in dense urban areas where vegetation and food is scarce; migratory birds select rooftops which resemble their natural feeding and nesting habitats (Brenneisen S. , 2006). A number of native grasses were planted during the construction of the roof; however the majority of vegetation has grown from seeds deposited by birds (Earth Pledge, 2005). Significance to Northern Ireland Habitat Replication The Clinic One building illustrates the following points for habitat recreation

There exists a readiness by both flora and fauna species to habitat rooftop habitats, when the roof provides resources similar to their natural habitats.

The University Hospital of Basel represents a successful recreated habitat, which required a low financial investment.

The ability of plant species to colonise green roofs through seed dispersal by birds, highlights the natural transition of rooftops vegetation in response to the residing fauna species. This makes the Clinic One building an example of an artificial habitat roof reaching a level of symbiosis with local wildlife.

Location Basal, Switzerland Completion Date 1999 Client University Hospital

of Basel Architect n/a Landscape Architect Stephan Brenneisen New Build/Retrofit New Green Roof Type Extensive Roof Size 1,860m2 Roof Coverage 60% Soil Medium 60% sand and

gravel; 40% topsoil with stones and humus

Soil Depth 90mm Cost £10/m2 Weight 146.5kg/m2

50

50

Laban Dance Centre

The brown roof on the Laban Dance Centre was constructed using debris found onsite during the construction process. Brick and Concrete were crushed and stacked unevenly across the roof to simulate a waterfront gravel/shingle bank supported by local dry grassland vegetation, which was once common to the Thames (Earth Pledge, 2005). The building won the RIBA 'building of the year' award, and Herzog & de Meuron won the Stirling Prize for the Laban Dance Centre building in 2003 (GreenRoof, 2010). The rooftop at the Laban Dance Centre has been designed to support the endangered Black Redstart bird species, one of the most endangered birds in the UK (Earth Pledge, 2005). The success of the roof in providing a nesting ground for the Black Redstart has encouraged the adoption of ecological green roofs by neighbouring buildings (Frith & Gedge, 2000); the issues of ecological roof in London will be expanded upon in chapter 4. Significance to Northern Ireland Habitat Replication The Laban Dance Centre illustrates the following points for habitat recreation

The Laban Dance Centre is another example of a successful habitat roof project. The nesting of the Black Redstart and use of the building as a part of their feeding

area, demonstrates that green roofs can play an important role in aiding in conservation methods.

A use of recycled construction material (crushed brick and concrete) within the artificial soil substrate showcases a more sustainable approach to green roof planting. Crush building material used in the aggregate layer of green roofs is not wide utilised within the UK construction sector (Graceson, Hare, Hall, & Monaghan, 2011).

Location London, England Completion Date 2002 Client Laban Dance Centre Architect Herzog & de

Meuron Landscape Architect Vogt Landscape

Architects New Build/Retrofit New Green Roof Type Intensive Rubble

Roof Roof Size 400m2 Roof Coverage 33% Soil Medium Rubble Soil Depth 120‐150mm Cost £22/m2 Weight Not available

51

51

3‐02 Cliffs and Slopes Habitat Case Studies An estimated 528 hectares of coastal cliffs and slopes surround Northern Ireland (Cooper, McCann, & Rogers, 2009), a diverse array of flora and fauna species inhabit these environments, dominating areas of high exposure and limited soil (CVNI, 2011).

The widespread presence of hard‐surfaced environments within built‐up areas and their colonisation by species adapted to rocky habitats has lead to the emergence of the ‘Urban Cliff Hypothesis’. This planning ecology concept states that development of urban areas is more complex than a simply destruction of natural habitat; rather original habitats are replacement by artificial habitats that function, both structurally and biologically, like rocky outcrop and cliff tops (Larson, Matthes, Kelly, Lundholm, & Gerrath, 2004).

The combination of resilient plant species and a natural affiliation between cliff habitats and urban structure, creates a wide number of both flora and fauna species that can readily be applied to many rooftops (Dunnett & Kingsbury, 2008; Lundholm & Marlin, 2006). An example of an interesting combination of cliff habitats and green roof environments is the Gallie Craig Coffee Shop at Drummore, Stranraer, in Scotland. The tourist building was designed by IB MacFadzean Architects whose green roof is integrated into the cliff face. A turf roof allows the building to blend into the contours of the land, reducing any detrimental visual effect on the landscape (GreenRoof, 2010). While this is a very direct representation of the combination of cliff and rooftop habitats, the examples does showcase that a direct comparison between the two habitats on ecological terms can be made.

Figure 6 ‐ Gallie Craig Coffee Shop,Drummore, Scotland

Cliffs and Slopes

Figure 5 ‐ Carrick‐a‐Rede Cliffs, Antrim

52

52

ACROS Fukuoka The Asian Crossroads over the Sea (ACROS) building is a public/private development in the centre of Fukuoka city, adjacent to the Tenjin Central Park. The aim of the design was to create public space equal to the land lost due to the buildings footprint. 15 vegetated terraces dominated the structures south façade, with access to the building’s interior at each floor. The majority of the planting species are indigenous to Japan, mostly hardy grasses and perennial flowers, with some non‐native annuals and perennials used for their aesthetics (Earth Pledge, 2005). Significance to Northern Ireland Habitat Replication The construction method implemented by the ACROS Building presents the following points for habitat recreation.

A high percentage of the land consumed by the buildings footprint has been replaced by rooftop vegetation, however this was a design requirement as the structure is located in a dense urban area with few open spaces or public greenery (GreenRoof, 2010).

The design of the ACROS Building showcases its rooftop vegetation as a prominent part of its primary façade.

The soils substrate layer of the ACROS Building uses a rubble soil system similar to the Laban Dance Centre; however this report was unable to find out if any recycled material was used in the construction process.

Location Fukuoka, Japan Completion Date 1995 Client Dal‐lchi Mutual Life

Mitsui Real Estate Architect Emilio Ambasz Landscape Architect Nihon Sekkei

Takenaka Corporation

New Build/Retrofit New Green Roof Type Intensive Roof Size 930m2 Roof Coverage 80% Soil Medium Rubble Soil Depth 300‐600mm Cost Not available Weight Not available

53

53

3‐03 Wetland Habitat Case Studies A growing market for organic water filtration systems (such as reed beds and willow) has encouraged the emergence of wetland habitats on many rooftops (Oberndorfer, et al., 2007). There is over an estimated 5,000 constructed wetlands in Germany, used primarily to treat residential and municipal wastewater in areas where a connection to the central sewage treatment system is too costly. The adoption of wetland rooftops has followed suit. (Earth Pledge, 2005), the issues of green roof adoption in Germany will be further discussed in chapter 4. This report was unable to establish if a wetland roof has ever been attempted in Northern Ireland.

Wetland plants clean and filter water naturally; microorganisms in the root systems and in wetland soil absorb and breakdown contaminants, metabolising them into nutrients (Earth Pledge, 2005). Additionally the minimal soil requirements and the ability to recycle nutrients in water runoff, results in the ability of flora and fauna that requires a permanent waterlogged environment that can exist on green roofs with appropriately designed drainage layers and irrigation systems (Coffman & Davis, 2005). The ability of rooftops to contain large bodies of water is limited. Partly due to the additional need for waterproofing any underling structure, but also the weight a substantial volume of water imposes. The largest example of a body of water within an artificial roof

wetland habitat recreation; is the 120m2 miniature lake around a penthouse suite of the BMW Düsseldorf Office Building. The rooftop habitat created by leading green roof manufacture ZinCo GmbH, is an intensive roof garden and large pond located 20 metres above ground on the roof of the BMW office building in Düsseldorf (GreenRoof, 2010). While the ability of static bodies of water to exist at roof level is limited (Dunnett & Kingsbury, 2008), however the capacity to apply wetland grasses and reed species is a more applicable and mature roofing approach (Coffman & Davis, 2005).

Figure 9 ‐ BMW Düsseldorf Office Building

Reed Beds


Floodplain Marsh


54

54

KPMG Building

During a programme of building renovations, a wetland environment was created on the roof of the parking complex in KPMG Dusseldorf. The wetland was a renovation of a previous ornamental pool which would regularly become choked with algae due to the high phosphate level of the tap water used to feed the habitat. The wetland uses a mixture of plant species that are current marketed with organic rainwater filtration systems and expanded into a larger natural system. The roof contains a well, grass landscaped area, an artificial swamp plus stream and the original pond. The well collects rainwater, which is pumped to an irrigation system for the landscaped area and the stream which feeds the swamp which drain into the pond. The water bodies are lined with volcanic rocks, which further filter the water and anchor reed species. The habitat has shown to support a complex array of insect and bird species. In addition to this, the roofing treatment has saved the building occupiers money through reduction in storm water fees and heat/cool costs (Earth Pledge, 2005). Significance to Northern Ireland Habitat Replication The KPMG building illustrates the following points for habitat recreation

A mosque of habitat condition has been created on the KPMG roof, which has been proven that a mix of habitats types on a single roof increases overall biodiversity (Brenneisen S. , 2006).

The water pumping system used by the KPMG buildings is complex and will have an impact of the maintenance and operation cost of the roof.

The construction costs and structural weight of the wetland roof is considerable when compared to other grassland habitat roofs.

Location Dusseldorf, Germany

Completion Date 2003 Client KPMG Architect Eckhard Gardenier Landscape Architect Ulrich Zens New Build/Retrofit New Green Roof Type Intensive Roof Size 4,100m2 Roof Coverage 67% Soil Medium topsoil for grasses;

lava mixed with zeolite for wetlands

Soil Depth 300‐ 400mm Cost £660/m2 Weight Not available

55

55

Possmann Cider Company

During a series of schemes to modernise its factory, the Possmann Cider Company required an alternative system to cool its fermentation tanks because of Germany’s high water charges. In 1993, the company installed a similar wetland green wetland roof as the system use at KPMG, creating a closed loop cooling system. Rainwater collected by the wetland is directed to the fermentation tanks and circulated back to the roof. Plants thrive in the warmer water and the dense shaded root systems quickly cool the water. The wetland has become populated by local bird species and a 1999 study showed that 20 new plant species had established themselves on the roof (Earth Pledge, 2005). Significance to Northern Ireland Habitat Replication The Possmann Cider Company illustrates the following points for habitat recreation

The company states that the wetland roof treatment has an annual saving of £3,6501 in the buildings cooling cost (Earth Pledge, 2005). Displaying wetland green roof as a means of sustainable building cooling.

This roof type combines sustainable technologies, namely a grey water rainwater storage system to reduce the need for mains water to feed the roof environment.

The adaption of hydroponic plant feeding methods has completely removed the need for an artificial soil substrate.

The Possmann Cider Company is an example of a habitat roof naturally colonised by a local bird species.

1 Figure converted from stated value ($6,000)

Location Frankfurt, Germany Completion Date 1993 Client Possmann Company Architect Siegfried Ziepke Landscape Architect Not available New Build/Retrofit Retrofit Green Roof Type Intensive Roof Size 3,000m2 Roof Coverage 100% Soil Medium None ‐ hydroponic Soil Depth n/a Cost Not available Weight Not available

56

56

John Deere Works

The manufacturing and assembly process at the John Deere factory in Mannheim, Germany produces an extensive volume of wastewater due to its metal cutting systems. Previously all wastewater in the factor was sent to a treatment plant and discharged to the municipal sewer system at a significant fee. The company did not have the require ground level land to support a natural treatment system, so rooftop system were explored. The roofing technique employed by the John Deere factory, does not utilise a soil base in order to limit the weight on the pre‐existing structure. The plant life receives nutrient from a 50mm deep hydroponic system. The designers of the roof system have found that a combination of Sedges, Rushes and Irises species are the most effective in the breakdown of carbon and nitrogen compounds in discharge water and can accumulate and remove suspended phosphates and heavy metals particles through their root systems (Earth Pledge, 2005). Green roofs can remove over 95% of cadmium, copper and lead in retained water they also remove 16% of zinc and dramatic reduce the level of water soluble Nitrogen (Schmidt, 1990). Significance to Northern Ireland Habitat Replication The John Deere factory illustrates the following points for habitat recreation

Again the John Deere factory uses a hydroponic plant feeding system A wetland habitat roof system was used in the John Deere factory to reduce the

water discharge of the metal works, unlike the Possmann Cider Company which was driven by the reduction of cooling costs.

Both the wetland roofs systems of the Possmann Cider Company and John Deere factory were designed as energy saving habitats, dedicated purely to their relationship with their connected buildings. This may present conflicting design drives; between building sustainability and habitat recreation.

Location Mannheim, Germany

Completion Date 2003 Client John Deere Architect John Deere Landscape Architect John Deere New Build/Retrofit Retrofit Green Roof Type Intensive Roof Size 42m2 Roof Coverage 65% Soil Medium None ‐ hydroponic Soil Depth 50mm Cost £330/m2 Weight 341.8kg/m2

57

57

3‐04 Woodland Habitat Case Studies While it is unexpected to have woodland habitats at roof level many examples exist (Peck & Kuhn, 2000). Trees and large bushes are exclusive to intensive green roofs and have the highest visual impact of any planting; however a number of factors need to be considered when creating woodland habitats

The weight of any planted tree must be calculated, as they induce a considerable concentrated load which can greatly increase during high winds due to the addition of tipping momentum under wind pressure (Francis & Lorimer, 2011). Trees with smaller leaves and a relatively small crown offer the best wind resistance, and the minimum soil depth for small trees is approximately 500mm. To counteract the debilitating factors of high winds and shallow soils it is necessary to anchor the

root ball to the roof structure below (Dunnett & Kingsbury, 2008). Irrigation systems are also crucial for the survival of tree on green roofs because of reduced root systems; they need a continuous flow of water to meet a tree’s nutrient and water requirements (White & Snodgrass, 2003). Additionally tree dominated rooftops are heavily affected by restricted size, due to a combination of the volume of single plants and the typical area of many roofs (Brenneisen & Hänggi, 2006). Despite these restriction successful woodland habitats can exist within a green roof environment, all be it in a heavily managed format (Earth Pledge, 2005). An extreme example of the combination of tree habitat and building is the Hundertwasserhaus, an apartment block in Vienna, Austria by the artist Friedensreich Hundertwasser. The building possesses an earth covered roof supporting numerous grasses and large trees, many of which have sprouted from inside rooms with their trunks protruding through the roof structure and having limbs extending from windows. The structure supports a total of 250 trees and bushes (Earth Pledge, 2005). While structures accommodating tree habitat do not go to such planting extremes as the Hundertwasserhaus, tree require care consideration before planting.

Figure 14 ‐ Hundertwasserhaus, Vienna

Native Woodlands Wet Woodlands

Figure 10 ‐ Belvoir Park Forest, Belfast Figure 11 ‐ Bonds Glen, Derry

Mixed Ashwood Oakwood

Figure 12 ‐ Glenarm Woodlands, Antrim Figure 13 ‐ Breen Oakwood, Antrim

58

58

The Patterson Garden

The rooftop garden of Glen Patterson at third floor level in the Escala Tower in the Vancouver harbour district was designed to resemble a costal wet forest. The roof supports a number of transplanted mature trees, mostly Black and White Pines and Maple, Cypress and evergreen Oak species (in addition a Gnarled Japanese Maple aged at over a 100years), an artificial pond and stream and a number of species of dwarf rhododendrons and mountain hemlocks as groundcover planting. Two years before the completion of the building, trees to be relocated to the roof were excavated and their roots cut back to 3‐foot diameter planting balls, to allow the plants time to adapted to the compact environments of the roof. Additionally shortly before being replanted at roof level the root balls were bound tightly with plastic strapping, using bonsai9 techniques, to restrain root growth (GreenRoof, 2010). Significance to Northern Ireland Habitat Replication The Patterson Garden illustrates the following points for habitat recreation

A 600mm substrate (a substantial soil depth for a roofing system) is needed to support tree species that have undergone induced stunted grown and dwarfism to adapt to roof conditions.

Special consideration was given during the roof’s construction to accommodate the additional weight imposed by the planted trees (Earth Pledge, 2005).

The roof has a purpose built automatic irrigation system to supply the water needs of the garden (Earth Pledge, 2005).

The rooftop was design as an ornamental garden not a natural habitat recreation with all trees species cloud pruned to a 900mm (Earth Pledge, 2005).

Location Vancouver, Canada Completion Date 2003 Client Glen Patterson Architect K.M. Cheng

Architects Landscape Architect Nakano Landscape

Design New Build/Retrofit New Green Roof Type Intensive Roof Size 185m2 Roof Coverage 100% Soil Medium black pumice

pebbles; graded sand; coconut fibres; zeolite

Soil Depth 300mm (600mm for tree roots)

Cost Not available Weight Roof strengthened

to load‐bearing of 1220kg/m2

59

59

Roppongi Hills

Roppongi Hills in the centre of Tokyo was conceived as an experimental urban development. In combination with a number of other schemes, the developments green spaces was envisaged as a way to revitalize the residences of downtown Tokyo, who were categorised as have high levels of depressed. Presently Roppongi Hills represents 26% of greens pace in central Tokyo. The scheme contains a number of green rooftops, with the Keyakizaha building supporting a rice paddy with a parameter tree line (GreenRoof, 2010). Significance to Northern Ireland Habitat Replication The Roppongi Hills illustrates the following points for habitat recreation

A requirement for additional structural props was needed to be installed in order to stabilise the planted tree species (Earth Pledge, 2005).

Rainwater storage in combination with a drib irrigation system was developed to provide water and nutrients for the roof habitat (Earth Pledge, 2005).

Again the Roppongi Hills was designed as an ornamental garden rather than a natural habitat, the majority of the Roppongi Hills is a combination of traditional Japanese and Japanese‐British style gardens (Earth Pledge, 2005).

Location Tokyo, Japan Completion Date 2003 Client Roppongi 6 Chrome

Redevelopment Association

Architect Cionran & Partners Landscape Architect Yohji Saski

& Dan Pearson New Build/Retrofit New Green Roof Type Extensive &

Intensive Roof Size 13,285m2 Roof Coverage 26% Soil Medium Soil;

Artificial aggregates; Sedum mats

Soil Depth 30‐1200mm Cost Not available Weight 97.6kg/m2

60

60

3‐05 Grassland Habitat Case Studies Grasses are common on many green roofs; many roof designs state that mimicking natural meadows is their primary goal (Budge, 2009). The shallow roots systems and the pressures imposed by grazing (Northern Ireland Habitat Action Plan, 2005) have created a diverse range of stress‐tolerant vegetation that is capable of adapting to a green roof environment (White & Snodgrass, 2003).

While certain grassland habitats will require intensive soil layer to support their principle species (CVNI, 2011; White & Snodgrass, 2003), lightweight extensive green roofs are capable of providing for many grassland habitats (Larson, Matthes, Kelly, Lundholm, & Gerrath, 2004). Many of the grasslands in Northern Ireland rely on a variation of a shallow mineral soil (NIEA, 2010) these conditions are replicable within the substrate of extensive green roofs (Dunnett N. , 2006). Grass roof habitats are a mature green roofing treatment, with a number of examples of grass covered green roofs which have been proven to provide for

surrounding wildlife or support rare species (Dunnett & Kingsbury, 2008). An example of the statement is the Ducks Unlimited National Headquarters and Conservation Centre in Winnipeg, Canada which contains a grass roof, this example has been previously mention in the freshwater habitats conclusions of chapter 3. This is an example of habitat recreation that provides resources for nesting birds from the adjacent Oak Hammond Marsh which has many parallels to Lough Neagh (GreenRoof, 2010).

Figure 20 ‐ Ducks Unlimited NationalHeadquarters, Winnipeg, Canada

Lowland Acid Grasslands Calcareous Grasslands

Figure 15 ‐ Wangford Warren, Suffolk Figure 16 ‐ Little Deer Park, Antrim

Lowland Meadows Rush Pastures

Figure 17 ‐ Tees Valley, Middlesbrough Figure 18 ‐ Slievenacloy, Belfast Hills

Limestone Pavements


61

61

Hill House

To comply with strict planning requirement for building within a ‘scenic corridor’, a buried dwelling was designed for the Norton family. The house used a system of concrete/ fieldstone retaining walls and sod covered roof to create to minimal impact building. The roof was cover with Winter Rye and local wildflowers with boundary of the sloped roof landscaped with Honeysuckle vines and Oak trees (GreenRoof, 2010). Significance to Northern Ireland Habitat Replication The Norton Hill House illustrates the following points for habitat recreation

The Hill House is an example of a semi‐buried structure; while his will allow for the colonisation of additional fauna species it will not affect the rate of flora and invertebrate species (Dunnett & Kingsbury, 2008).

A mixture of commercially available road aggregate and natural topsoil was used in the development of this roof system; a sustainably questionable material mixture.

The direct connection between the building roof and surrounding natural environment was an imposed design feature.

Location La Honda, California Completion Date 1979 Client George & Adele

Norton Architect Jersey Devil

Design/Build Landscape Architect Jersey Devil

Design/Build New Build/Retrofit New Green Roof Type Extensive Roof Size 232m2 Roof Coverage 100% Soil Medium 50% road base and

50% topsoil Soil Depth 200mm Cost £650/m2 Weight 439.4kg/m2

62

62

Heinz 57 Centre

The green roof on the Heinz 57 Centre was part of the refurbishment of the long abandonment building located on the fringe of Pittsburgh historic quarter (Earth Pledge, 2005). The high masonry walls that surround the garden have created a sheltered micro‐climate which has led to a more diverse range of vegetation. The roof is populated by a number of flowering wildflowers and sedum species, with an all year round blooming cycle (Earth Pledge, 2005). The plant list includes 35 separate plant species, which ranges from low‐growing groundcover plants like sedum to taller vegetation such as Anthemis and Carex (GreenRoof, 2010). Significance to Northern Ireland Habitat Replication The Heinz 57 Centre illustrates the following points for habitat recreation

No irrigation system is use on the Heinz 57 Centre; instead the roof drainage layer can hold 30% of its volume in rainwater (representing 55% of predicted annual rainwater). This water retention rate is in line with German FLL standards (Earth Pledge, 2005).

The roof structural systems is an example of what can be achieve at the low building costs and roof loading scale for grass roof habitats.

The high masonry walls of the Heinz 57 Centre shows that through appropriate building design it is possible mitigate the effects of exposed rooftops or even alter the conditions of a green roof through the creation of microclimates

Location Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania

Completion Date 2001 Client 623 Smithfield

Associates Architect Burt Hill Koser

Rittlemann Associates

Landscape Architect Burt Hill Koser Rittlemann Associates

New Build/Retrofit Retrofit Green Roof Type Extensive Roof Size 1,115m2 Roof Coverage 33% Soil Medium 90% mineral;

10% organic Soil Depth 120mm Cost £105.50/m2 Weight 146.5kg/m2

63

63

Chicago City Hall

In conjunction with an Environmental Protection Agency programme to negate the urban heat island effect and to improve city air quality, Mayor Richard M. Daley and the City of Chicago began construction of an exhibition semi‐extensive green roof on The Chicago City Hall in April 2000 (GreenRoof, 2010). The garden was a retrofit development on the century old city Hall and is not accessible to members of the public. The roof supports both native and non‐native plant species, with has been organised in a number of colour related planting beds (Earth Pledge, 2005). The City Hall rooftop garden has over 150 species, in addition to 100 woody shrubs, 40 vines and 2 trees, Cockspur Hawthorn and Prairie Crab‐apple (GreenRoof, 2010). Significance to Northern Ireland Habitat Replication

The Chicago City Hall illustrates the following points for habitat recreation It is stated that the city hall has an annual saving of £3,0502 in general utility cost

due to the cooling effect and rainwater retention provided by the grass roof (Earth Pledge, 2005).

Supplemental irrigation systems has been added to the roofs systems to aid in the establishment of plants as well as provide supplemental water during extreme periods of drought (GreenRoof, 2010).

The research into the reduction of heat island effect and green roofs is still ongoing; however published figures state that there is a 15oC difference between the green roof and neighbouring black tar roofs in the height of summer (City of Chicago, 2010).

2 Figure converted from stated value ($5,000)

Location Chicago. Illinois Completion Date 2001 Client City of Chicago Architect William McDonough

+ Partners Landscape Architect Conservation Design

Forum New Build/Retrofit Retrofit Green Roof Type Extensive &

Intensive Roof Size 2,045m2 Roof Coverage 56% Soil Medium Commercial growth

media Soil Depth 100mm

150mm 450mm

Cost £300/m2 Weight 100mm=146.5kg/m2

150mm=293kg/m2 450mm=439.5kg/m2

64

64

Moos Water Filtration Plant

The Moos Water Filtration Plant near Zurich built in 1914 (one of the first reinforce concrete structures in the region) supports nine‐acres of species rich rooftop meadows. These roofs were not designed as a green roof, but as a sand/gravel/soil roof to add in the cooling of the building and plants have naturally colonised the space over the buildings lifetime. The three oldest roofscapes cover approximately 3 hectares and provide habitat for 175 different plant species, including 9 species of orchids (GreenRoof, 2010), including 6,000 specimens of Orchis Morio, an orchid species thought to be extinct in the area (Earth Pledge, 2005). The roofs are currently under consideration to be granted environment protection orders by the regional government (Earth Pledge, 2005). Significance to Northern Ireland Habitat Replication The Moos Water Plant illustrates the following points for habitat recreation

The roof’s structure presents excellent evidence for the longevity of green roofs (Dunnett & Kingsbury, 2008) and the ability of green roofs to be naturally colonised by unexpected species (Brenneisen, 2006).

The soil substrate consists of 5cm of sand and gravel as a drainage layer, with between 15cm and 20cm of topsoil. This again raises questions of sustainability and the sourcing of substrate material mixture.

Location Zurich, Switzerland Completion Date 1914 Client City of Zurich Architect Not available Landscape Architect Not available New Build/Retrofit Retrofit Green Roof Type Intensive Roof Size 9,290m2 Roof Coverage 100% Soil Medium Topsoil and humus Soil Depth 200mm Cost Not available Weight 488.2kg/m2

65

65

Vancouver Conference Centre

Also known as the Vancouver Convention Centre West, this building includes a six‐acre green roof designed to replicate British Columbia costal grassland, which is currently the largest in Canada and the largest non‐industrial living roof in North America. The building was awarded an LEED Platinum rating on completion, the first conference centre in the world to achieve such a rating (GreenRoof, 2010). The green roof is landscaped with more than 400,000 specimens of native plants and grasses from the Gulf Islands, including Sea Thrift and Beach Strawberry, which provides natural habitat to birds, insects and small mammals. An important design principle for the green roof was that no peat moss be use in the soil makeup (Budge, 2009), as such the roof medium is based on dredged dockland sands and recycled organic material (GreenRoof, 2010). This is because the client required that no existing habitats be damaged in the production of the soil layer for the new green roof (Budge, 2009). Significance to Northern Ireland Habitat Replication The Vancouver Convention Centre illustrates the following points for habitat recreation

A design decision was made not to use peat moss in the development of the roof’s soil substrate. As such recycled aggregate and organic matter gathered from the building’s kitchen and landscaping activities (Budge, 2009).

The building is an example of the discovery that meadow wildflowers were more abundant on the north‐facing section, and annual species, although present, were less prevalent than on the south‐facing section (Grant G. , 2006).

The Vancouver Convention Centre is an example of a large scale green roof developed specifically for the purposes of habitat replacement within an urban area.

Location Vancouver, Canada Completion Date 2008 Client BC Pavilion

Corporation Architect LMN Architects Landscape Architect PWL Partnership New Build/Retrofit New Green Roof Type Intensive Roof Size 24,281m2 Roof Coverage 58% Soil Medium Engineered Soil;

sand, organic medium, lava rock

Soil Depth 300mm Cost Not available Weight Not available

66

66

3‐06 Heathland Habitat Case Studies The dominance of a limited number of species within a small area, the reliance on a nutrient‐poor, heavily mineralised soils in addition to an adaption for a fragmented and restricted habitat range (NIEA, 2010); presents numerous feature of heathland that make them a viable candidate for habitat recreation projects within Northern Ireland’s urban roofscape.

A continuous exposure to environmental stresses has spawned an array of low dense vegetation, drought‐tolerant shrubs (Gates, 1980), and heaths (Cooper & McCann, 2001); all evolved to cope with the condition that are present on many rooftops. There exists a growing industrial trend to use heath, mosses and sedum roofs are method of reducing rainwater runoff across the world (Earth Pledge, 2005). And because of the thin

soils requirements, heathland species can flourish on the substrate of lightweight extensive (Brenneisen, 2006). Additionally the natural tendency for heaths to be near mono‐culture plants in isolated locations (NIEA, 2010), a clear parallel exists between the natural conditions of heaths and the leading method of plant extensive green roof through sedum or moss vegetation mats (Dunnett & Kingsbury, 2008).

Many buildings already use heath and moss extensive roof on small isolated sections of roof, because of their ability to created at little structural or monetary cost and survive with relatively no maintenance (Dunnett & Kingsbury, 2008). An example of this is the North German Bank (Nord LB0) in Hanover, Germany by Behnisch, Behnisch & Partner Architects. The building supports 13 heath and moss extensive roofs and two larger intensive roofs. The generous use of heath roofs is cosmetic; creating a more visually pleasing environment for the buildings occupants looking out the structure exclusively glass facades (GreenRoof, 2010).

Figure 24 ‐ North German Bank, Hanover,Germany

Lowland Heaths Upland Heaths

Figure 21 ‐ Murlough National Nature Reserve Figure 22 ‐ Bloody Bridge near Newcastle

Mountainous Heaths

Figure 23 ‐ Mourne Mountains

67

67

Life Expression Chiropractic Centre

The rooftops of the Life Expression Chiropractic Centre was installed for its functional aspect of temperature regulation and runoff control, in addition to the visual quality of the roof vegetation to blend into the surrounding rural Appalachian Valley (Earth Pledge, 2005). The unique roof design and planting allows rainwater runoff to discharge along the full length of the building’s eaves, creating a curtain effect of falling water during heavy rain (GreenRoof, 2010). The roof is planted with a variety of native mosses and sedum species (Earth Pledge, 2005). Significance to Northern Ireland Habitat Replication The Life Expression Chiropractic Centre illustrates the following points for habitat recreation

The green roof demonstrates the ability of lightweight extensive roofs to support dense low‐growing groundcover on a sloped roof ranging from 14o to 30o, believed to be one of the steepest green roofs in North America (GreenRoof, 2010).

No irrigation system was installed on the roof; rather the growing medium was designed to retain an estimated 55% of the annual rainfall (Earth Pledge, 2005).

Any innovative approach was taken to protect the roof from wind erosion while the plant species established themselves. A medium surface with a photodegradable wind blanket mesh was installed to cover the sprouting vegetation, which has since degraded (Earth Pledge, 2005).

Location Sugarloaf, Pennsylvania

Completion Date 2001 Client Life Expression

Wellness Centre Architect Van der Ryn

Architects Landscape Architect Roofscapes Inc. New Build/Retrofit New Green Roof Type Extensive Roof Size 557.5m2 Roof Coverage 100% Soil Medium 90% mineral; 10%

organic Soil Depth 120mm Cost £46/m2 Weight 137kg/m2

68

68

Schiphol Plaza

Schiphol Plaza at Amsterdam airport has its green roof designed to reflect the condition of surrounding flat plains. The expanse of heath and sedum species has a wide degree of seasonal colour change acting as visual aesthetic for traveller who utilise the underline train station and airport terminal. The green roof also acts as a measure to reduce water runoff in line with the airports environmental policies (Earth Pledge, 2005). Construction of the green roof consisted of the installation of pre‐vegetated mats of moss and sedum bound together with coir fibre (made from the husks of coconuts), which absorb rainfall and contain a mineral‐based substrate that provides plant nutrients and eliminates the need for soil (GreenRoof, 2010). Significance to Northern Ireland Habitat Replication The Schiphol Plaza illustrates the following points for habitat recreation

The Schiphol Plaza can showcase an example of a large scale green roof developed specifically to replicate a mountainous habitat that surrounds the built up area.

The planting choices and roof structure is extremely lightweight green roofing approach, being less than a third of the loading requirement of the UK’s domestic buildings, 45kg/m2 compared to 153 kg/m2 (Adler, 1999).

Location The Vague, The Netherlands

Completion Date 1994 Client Amsterdam Airport

Schiphol Architect Benthem Crouwel

NACA Landscape Architect Andriaan Geuze,

West 8 New Build/Retrofit New Green Roof Type Extensive Roof Size 8,100m2 Roof Coverage 90% Soil Medium Not available Soil Depth 30mm Cost £26/m2 Weight 45kg/m2

69

69

Somoval Garbage Treatment Plant

The Somoval treatment plant in Monthyon is located less than a mile from the Paris city limits and contains a 4‐acre green roof to add in the minimal visual impact of the structure. The vibrant sedum and moss roof was designed to allow the building to better blend into the surrounding countryside after complaints by local residents. The roofs vegetation turns from red into summer to a green during winter and provides an insulation effect for treatment the plant (Earth Pledge, 2005). Significance to Northern Ireland Habitat Replication The Somoval Treatment Plant illustrates the following points for habitat recreation

The Somoval Treatment Plant is another example of a large green roof designed to replicate and blend in with a surrounding mountainous habitat.

The low construction cost of the Somoval Treatment Plant is noteworthy, being the second lowest costing of all the presented case studies.

Again the Somoval Treatment Plant is an example of a large roof at a scope with contains extensive planting.

Location Monthyon, France Completion Date 1997 Client Somoval Architect S’PACE Landscape Architect Not available New Build/Retrofit New Green Roof Type Extensive Roof Size 15,329m2 Roof Coverage Not available Soil Medium Commercial growing

medium Soil Depth 70mm Cost £14.50/m2 Weight 178kg/m2

70

70

3‐07 Practical Implications of Rooftop Habitat Recreation The research undertaken in the development of this chapter has provided a number of values in regards to the physical and economical attributes associated with habitat recreation on building rooftops. The following table details the type of environments capable of be recreated depending on the type of green roof installed. The following table details the associated structural loading in regard to what form of habitat type has been developed on a building’s roof. And finally the last table demonstrates a typical cost range to the construction and planting of an artificial habitat at roof level.

Table 2 ‐ Required Roof Type for Habitat Recreation

Table 3 – Imposed Roof Loading for Habitat Recreation

Table 4 – Estimable Cost Range for Habitat Recreation

Recreated Habitat Type Roof type Coastal Extensive &

Intensive

Woodland Intensive only

Wetland Intensive only

Grassland Extensive & Intensive

Heathland Extensive

Recreated Habitat Type Weight/m2 Coastal 75 ‐ 145kg

Wetland 350kg

Woodland 1250kg

Grassland 150 ‐ 490kg

Heathland 45 ‐ 180kg

Recreated Habitat Type Cost/m2 Coastal £10‐£45

Wetland £300‐£600

Grassland £100‐£650

Heathland £15‐£45

71

71



Coastal Vegetation

Arid Vegetation

Reed Bed Vegetation





Roofs






Woodland Habitats


Oakwood

Grassland Habitats




Mountainous Heaths

Peatland Habitats


Fens


Roofs

Coastal Habitats

Wetland Habitats

Woodland Habitats

Grassland Habitats

Heathland Habitats



72

72

Chapter 4 Green Roof Habitat Creation for Northern Ireland

73

73

The previous chapter focused on examples of environments created on green roofs to provide information on the practicality of habitat creation on green roofs. The final chapter of this report is designed to refine the number of viable green roof habitats to those which are most feasible to be applied to the existing urban areas in Northern Ireland. This task will utilise the information and findings revealed in previous chapters of this document, in order to gauge the consequences of applying roof greening across Northern Ireland. The combined endeavours of the previous chapters have generated information supporting the ability of green roofs to meet the habitat requirements of Coastal, Wetland, Woodland, Grassland and Heathland. This is further promoted by the environmental conditions of Northern Ireland which presents a preference for Cliff/Costal, Wetland, Grassland, and Heathland vegetation on our rooftops. This chapter aims to examine the ability of Northern Ireland’s urban areas to support green roof habitats and briefly explore the physical, monetary and municipal influences over the development of rooftop habitats. 4‐01 Urban Resources in Northern Ireland Northern Ireland is a region dominated by agricultural land; with 44% of the national landmass consumed by improved grassland and horticulture plantations (Cooper, McCann, & Rogers, 2009). With a population density half that of the UK, 122people/km2 to the UK’s 255.6/km2 (Pointer, 2005), Northern Ireland is a relatively un‐urbanised country. The Northern Ireland Countryside Survey 2007 concluded that only 5% of Northern Ireland’s landmass consists of human settlements (Cooper, McCann, & Rogers, 2009).

The urban centres of Northern Ireland are primarily concentrated in the area surrounding Lough Neagh (Countryside Survey, 2008). The Belfast Metropolitan area is the largest urban centre, representing 22% of the total urbanised land in Northern Ireland (Pointer, 2005). Growth in urban areas over the past number of decades throughout Northern Ireland has predominantly been at the expense of agricultural and natural grassland habitats (Cooper, McCann, & Rogers, 2009).

Figure 1 ‐ Belfast City

Figure 2 ‐ Northern Ireland's Urban Centres (Countryside Survey, 2008)

Table 1 ‐ Extent of Urban Area in Northern Ireland (Cooper, McCann, & Rogers, 2009)

Urban Habitats ha % of N.I.

Habitat Change Between1998‐2007

ha % Change

Urban/Built up Areas 74098 5.23 +17251 +30.35 Roads / Tracks & Hard Embankments 30951 2.19 +1503 +5.10

74

74

While urbanised zones are a minority land use type, they are not without an ecological value (Wheater, 1999). Urban wildlife habitats consists of any ecological niches found within a built up area, such as buildings, hard surfaces, and any open brownfield or green spaces (NIEA, 2010). Urban ecological habitats are based on managed green spaces (parks and gardens (Wheater, 1999)) and naturally seeded urban areas or industrial sites (demolition sites, railway lands or undeveloped industrial land (Harvey, 2001)). These habitats support a large number of plants, invertebrates and bird species, especially in the suburbs (National Archives, 1995). For example both Herring and Black‐backed Gulls are now commonly found nesting on the roofs of many buildings; flat roofs in particular are favoured as breeding grounds. Additionally the Albert Bridge in Belfast provides a safe roosting site for thousands of Starlings (NIEA, 2010). The most important characteristic of urban areas is that they are compromised of a dense mosaic of habitats. This mixture of habitats within a limited location gives rare ground‐nesting invertebrates and other fauna species a mixture of breeding site, foraging areas and shelter need to sustain their occupation (National Archives, 1995). Green roofs are a building treatment that will augment the existing ecological resources provided by urban habitats with a simulated natural environment, expanding the relationship between flora and fauna species and the built environment (Gedge & Kadas, 2005). Estimated Rooftop Area in Northern Ireland Through a combination of information sources (the Northern Ireland Countryside Survey 2007, the Ordnance Survey NI and EU reports) and publish work by Lance Frazer; the following approximation of the total area of roof space in Northern Ireland has been made. These figures will feature in further discussion on the implementation of green roofs within Northern Ireland.

Estimated Rooftop Area of Northern Ireland Urban Centres

1 Based on the statistic that typically roof space represents up to 32% of the total surface areas in an urban area 2 Encompasses the Belfast Urban Area, Castlereagh Urban Area, Greenisland Urban Area, Holywood Urban Area, Lisburn Urban Area, Newtownabbey Urban Area and Milltown (Lisburn LGD) Additional Information Lisburn City Area: 57km2 (Boyde, 2011)

Estimated Roof space: 18km2 (Frazer, 2005)

Total Urban Area of Northern Ireland 741km2 (Cooper, McCann, & Rogers, 2009) Estimated Roof space 255km2 (Frazer, 2005)1

Belfast Metropolitan Area2 162km2 (Pointer, 2005) Estimated Roof space 52km2 (Frazer, 2005) Derry City Area 25km2 (Monaghan, 2011) Estimated Roof space 8km2 (Frazer, 2005) Newry City Area 9km2 (OSNI, 2011) Estimated Roof space 2.9km2 (Frazer, 2005) Armagh City Area 5km2 (OSNI, 2011) Estimated Roof space 1.7km2 (Frazer, 2005)

Figure 3 ‐ Albert Bridge, Belfast

Table 2 ‐ Size of Major Urban Centres in Northern Ireland

75

75

4‐02 Re‐establishment of Natural Habitats As part of the Northern Ireland Habitat Action Plan, which has been discussed in chapter 2 and appendix A, a number of reports into individual habitat types were commissioned. These documents described the condition of Northern Ireland’s natural habitats but also presented goals for the rehabilitation and future expansion of natural ecosystems. While these documents discuss a number of factors effecting individual habits (such as key features, range and causes of habitat loss) which were utilised in previous chapters, they also detail requirements for future habitat conservation programmes proposed to be completed by 2015. These figures are detailed in the tables below. Habitat to be restored by 2015 While green roofs cannot play a direct role in the restoration of natural habitats, the case studies of chapter 3 have illustrated that green roof habitats can recreate the condition of a number of existing ecosystems. The multiple examples in chapter 3, showcases a type of environments possible and will be further discussed later on in this chapter. Habitat to be re‐established by 2015 The figures stated above, describe a requirement for traditional methods of habitat recreation, and were not envisioned to be applied to urban habitat recreation projects, let

Table 3 ‐ Northern Ireland Habitat Action Plan Required Restoration of Natural Habitats

Table 4 ‐ Northern Ireland Habitat Action Plan Required Re‐establishment of Natural Habitats

Habitat Type ha km2 Saltmarshes 100 1

Sand Dunes 1150 11.5 Vegetated Shingles Banks 25 0.25

Floodplain Grazing Marsh 50 0.5

Wet Woodlands 70 0.7 Mixed Ashwood 90 0.9 Oakwood 60 0.6

Limestone Pavement 220 2.2

Fens 50 0.5

Habitat Type ha km2 Wet Woodlands 140 1.4 Mixed Ashwood 180 1.8 Oakwood 120 1.2

Lowland Dry Acid Grasslands 5 0.05 Calcareous Grasslands 10 0.1 Lowland Meadows 10 0.1

Lowland Heaths 130 1.3 Upland Heaths 100 1 Mountainous Heaths 25 0.25

76

76

alone rooftop environments. This stated the investigations undertaken by chapter 1 and 3, illustrate willingness by flora and fauna species to colonise rooftop habitats, when they provide resources similar to their natural habitats (Frith & Gedge, 2000). Because of this fact, an argument can be made that rooftop habitats can have a place in the national recreation programs of certain natural habitats (Brenneisen S. , 2006). 4‐03 Structural Viability of Green Roof Habitats By combining the legal structural requirements for roofs under British Standards 6399 and the information gather on completed green roof habitat projects within chapter 3, a comparison can be made between typical building usage and the types of habitat roofs they can support. UK Roof Structural Requirements (Adler, 1999) These figures represent the general structural requirements for all new builds in the UK. While alternative values exist for buildings with specific usage, the above standards are the most common strength for the building category. These values are the legally required minimum for any construction system (Adler, 1999), so are reliable reflections of the strength of Northern Ireland’s buildings. Range of Green Roof Weight Loads It is important to note that the above values are derived from completed examples of green roofs, a number of which are detailed in chapter 3. Green roof weight range are typically organised by the type of roofing structure (extensive, intensive, etc) and not ecological environments, however the weight of any green roof is calculated individually before installation commences and do not rely on generic or industry stated data. An alternative body of data on the weight ranges of green roofs can be obtained from the German Landscape Research, Development and Construction Society guidelines (Forschungsgesellschaft Landschaftsentwicklung Landschaftsbau [FLL]) and specific product guidelines.

Table 5 ‐ Required Roof Loading (Adler, 1999)

Table 6 – Imposed Roof Loading for Habitat Recreation

BS6399 Category N/m2 kg/m2 Domestic 1.5 153 Offices 2.5 255 Retail 4.0 408 Warehousing 2.0 204 Factories, Workshops 5.0 510

Recreated Habitat Type Weight/m2 Coastal 75 ‐ 145kg

Wetland 350kg

Woodland 1250kg

Grassland 150 ‐ 490kg

Heathland 45 ‐ 180kg

77

77

Types of Habitat Roofs capable of occupying Non‐Reinforced Structures Through cross‐comparison of the two above tables and an understanding of the range of habitats that are structurally viable on Northern Ireland’s building stock can be achieved. Coastal, Grassland and Heaths are the most accommodating to a building’s structure as they are comprised of lightweight vegetation. Conversely woodland habitats, with their weighty planting are outside the structural norms of nearly all of Northern Ireland’s structures. Wood roofs are considered to impose a load of 700‐1300kg/m² (Optigreen, 2011) placing them beyond the structural requirement of all typical structure, because of this woodland habitats are restricted to reinforced roofs only. Additionally the water retention rate of wood roofs is estimated at between 95‐99%, translating into a possible further 180‐320L/m² of rainwater to structurally accommodate (Optigreen, 2011). The typical architecture of Northern Ireland’s is dominated by pitched roof structures. While green roofs can occupy the slopes common to most roofs, these systems require additional support and an associated weigh. Pitched lightweight sedum/moss/heather roofs weight 100‐130kg/m² (Optigreen, 2011) and grassed pitch roofs generally impose a loading of 160‐190kg/m² (Optigreen, 2011). These figures present Coastal and Heath habitats as structurally viable options on non‐strengthen domestic roof within Northern Ireland. 4‐04 Expense of Green Roof Habitat Recreation With the information gained during the third chapter, detailing examples of successfully developed green roof habitats. An approximation can be made for the general financial cost associated with any programme to facilitate rooftop habitat creation in Northern Ireland. Green Roof Construction Costs

Table 7 – Building Types Capable of Carrying Habitat Roofs

Table 8 – Estimable Cost Range for Habitat Recreation

Building Type Habitat

Coastal

Wetland

Woo

dlan

d

Grasslan

d

Heathlan

d

Domestic Offices Retail Warehousing Factories, Workshops

Recreated Habitat Type Cost/m2 Sand Dunes / Shingles Banks £10‐£45

Wetland £300‐£600

Grassland £100‐£650

Heathland £15‐£45

78

78

Because of the subjective nature of the building process, the above financial costing figures are to be considered representative prices only. These values are based on the information used in generating the datasets in chapter 3, and are all based on complete green roof projects. Habitat to be re‐established by 2015 The Northern Ireland Habitat Action Plan proposes areas of habitat recreation to be achieved by 2015, which was discussed earlier in this chapter in section 4‐02. These government targets for natural habitat expansion are a fitting goal for a large scale programme for the adoption of habitat green roofs. The areas of proposed habitats re‐established are negligible when compared to the total area of roof space throughout Northern Ireland, as shown in section 4‐01. Rooftop Habitat Recreation Costs The above pricing is an estimated value of developing the corresponding natural habitats on rooftops in Northern Ireland to meeting the goals of the Northern Ireland Habitat Action Plan. These figure were arrive at by applying the expected cost per metre of green roofs to the require habitat expansion require under the Northern Ireland Habitat Action Plan.

Table 9 ‐ Northern Ireland Habitat Action Plan Required Re‐establishment of Natural Habitats

Table 10 ‐ Estimated Costs of introducing wide scale Habitat Roofs to Northern Ireland

Habitat Type ha km2 Wet Woodlands 140 1.4 Mixed Ashwood 180 1.8 Oakwood 120 1.2

Lowland Dry Acid Grasslands 5 0.05 Calcareous Grasslands 10 0.1 Lowland Meadows 10 0.1

Lowland Heaths 130 1.3 Upland Heaths 100 1 Mountainous Heaths 25 0.25

Habitat Type km2 Cost Lowland Dry Acid Grasslands 0.05 £5million ‐

£32.5million Calcareous Grasslands 0.1 £10million ‐

£65million Lowland Meadows 0.1 £10million ‐

£65million

Lowland Heaths 1.3 £19.5million ‐ £58.5million

Upland Heaths 1 £15million ‐ £45million

Mountainous Heaths 0.25 £375,000 ‐ £1.125million

79

79

The initial costs related to the development of green roof habitats are significantly larger than those of traditional habitat recreation efforts, with the recreation of calcareous grasslands estimated at £40‐1500/ha (Gilbert & Anderson, 1998). However green roof typically exists the same length as their supporting building, with the green roofs at Moos Water Filtration Plant installed in 1914 (Brenneisen, 2006) and the ‘Derry and Toms’ department store in Kensington High Street, London installed in 1938 (Scrivens, 1980) being good examples. Whereas subsidising farmers to create natural habitats is licences in 5 year contracts under Northern Ireland’s Management of Sensitive Sites (MOSS) annual payment scheme (MOSS, 2002), the MOSS system is further expanded upon in Appendix B. 4‐05 Northern Ireland Accommodating Green Roof Habitats The ability of green roofs to promote habitat recreation and urban ecological diversity depends on factors associated with the local authority. A number of models exist to allow municipal authorities to develop green roofs within their area. An example of the influence local government has over green roof adoption is Basel, Switzerland. The implementation of a course of ecological research projects into the biodiversity potential of green roofs in the city ultimately led to the amendment of the city’s building and construction laws (Nature and Landscape Conservation Act § 9; Building and Planning Act § 72). Currently as part of Basel's biodiversity strategy, green roofs are now mandatory on new buildings with flat roofs. (Brenneisen S. , 2006) And for green roofs over 500m2, the substrates must be composed of natural soils and come from the surrounding region (Brenneisen S. , 2005). Northern Ireland can take note of the policies regarding green roof development in large cities around the world. Large international cities cope with similar urban scales and potential development programmes that would result in a national implementation plan if applied to Northern Ireland. Berlin The city government of Berlin began to promote green roofs in order to reduce the city’s water consumption and as a response of a growing environmental consciousness among the city’s inhabitants (Earth Pledge, 2005), this was briefly mentioned in section 1‐10. Green roofs first appeared in Germany in the 1880’s, during a period of rapid industrialisation when numerous tenement blocks were built to house a growing work force. Inexpensive tar roofs were common but were highly flammable. To combat this risk, tar roofs were covered with layer of sand and gravel, accidentally creating an excellent growing medium allowing for the natural colonisation of the roof space (Earth Pledge, 2005). The modern move toward green roofs began in the 1970’s with the convergence of a growing environmentalism movement, urban renewal programs and the rediscovery of Berlin’s 19th century green roofs (Darius & Drepper, 1984).

Figure 4 ‐ UFA Film Fabrik, Berlin

80

80

In 1975 the German Landscape Research, Development and Construction Society guidelines (Forschungsgesellschaft Landschaftsentwicklung Landschaftsbau [FLL]) was developed providing universal standards for the construction and quality of green roofs. This has become a worldwide recognised standard for green roof construction (Gedge & Kadas, 2005). During the 1980’s the West Berlin government began a grant program, following the successful completion of a demonstrator project which tested the aesthetic, environmental and public health benefits of greening an entire city block. The greening programme reimbursed residents for roughly half of the total cost of green roof installation, between3 £23/m2 and £47/m2. The grant subsidises succeeded in promoting the construction of 63,500m2 of extensive green roofs in Berlin between 1983 and end of the scheme in 1997 (Koehler & Schmidt, 1997). In 1984, a federal court ruling introduced increased transparency in water utility billing, because of this base water levies were removed and freshwater consumption and storm water removal fees were introduced (Earth Pledge, 2005). Due to the water retention rate of green roofs and the delay in rainwater runoff (Graceson, Hare, Hall, & Monaghan, 2011; Keeley, 2003), green roofs were largely adopted in subsequent new developments (in conjunction with the grant system) as a means to reduce a buildings water costs (Keeley, 2003). Presently Berlin implements a landscape master‐plan called the Biotope Area Factor (BAF). A plan which assigns targets for the amount of greenery that should exists on individual properties. The plan is non‐prescriptive about the form of urban greenery required, but property owners and developers must meet the target to be issued building permits (Earth Pledge, 2005). Green roofs have become a popular method of meeting a buildings BAF target and help progress the mainstreaming of green roofs within Germany (Dunnett & Kingsbury, 2008). Tokyo The green roofs of Tokyo have been developed to take advantage of ability of green roofs to reduce the heat island effect (Skinner, 2006; Alexandri & Jones, 2008)as described in section 1‐10. Because of six decades of urban expansion, and that only 14% of Tokyo’s land area retains any greenery, the climate of Tokyo has become more tropical in the past 25 years; driven principally by a growing heat island effect due to the hard surfaces of the densely populated city (Earth Pledge, 2005). The temperature increase of Tokyo is five times faster than the global warming rate because of the local heat island effect4. The city’s biodiversity has changed as well, tropical species such as palm trees and wild parakeets have colonised parkland. Additionally, dengue fever

3 Converted for original value of 60DM/m2 and 120DM/m2 4 The mean annual temperature of downtown Tokyo increased by 3oC, compared to a 1.6oC rise in New York

Figure 5 ‐ Atago Building, Tokyo

81

81

outbreaks began to occur after humid summers, due to the new tropical climate of central Tokyo (Brooke, 2002). A 2001 Environment Ministry study found that the high percentage of impermeable surfaces in Tokyo was directly contributing to the city’s warming. The study recommended a widespread urban greening programme, including tree planting, park expansions and the proposed construction of 30km2 of green roofs (Morishita, 2002). In order to address the need to add greenery to Tokyo, a subsidy programme began in 2002, which succeeded in greening 7,000m2 of Tokyo’s roofs, one‐fifth of which were retrofitted to existing buildings (MSNBC News, 2002). Furthermore amendments were made to building laws which mandated the installation of green roofs on all newly constructed building. Private building larger than 1,000m2 and public buildings larger than 250m2 must cover 20% of rooftop with greenery or face an annual penalty of £1,6005 (Tokyo Metropolitan Government, 2002). In the first year of its implementation, the net total of green roofs in Tokyo almost doubled, from 52,428m2 in 2001 to 104,412m2 at the end of 2002, achieved principally by private developments (Tokyo Metropolitan Government, 2002). Because of the success of this legislation; the requirement for 20% green roof coverage was extended to multiple‐dwelling housing schemes in 2003 (Earth Pledge, 2005). Green roofs have become commonplace on new developments in Tokyo, partly due to government policy but and the realisation green roofs can improve property values. Developers have begun to install elaborate roof gardens, which significantly increase the rents they can charge for their buildings (Earth Pledge, 2005). London Docklands On a macro scale green roofs were advanced in London to reconcile biodiversity conservation with aspects of urban renewal along the Thames docklands, but more specifically they came to public attention because of birds (Frith & Gedge, 2000). The brownfield sites around the Deptford Power Station and the Deptford Creek were areas that supported a number of endangered species, such as Linnets and the ‘Humble Bumble’ Bee whose primary habitat is urban brownfield site (Scholfield & Waugh, 2003). But it was the Black Redstart, one of Britain most endangered avian species, which brought the topic of urban habitat conservation to the public’s attention (Dunnett N. , 2006). A number of locations along the Thames are important nesting site for the Black Redstart and are legally protected. However under UK conservation law at the time, these habitats were only protected while birds were nesting on the site. Due to this loophole developers were legally allowed to begin

5 Converted for original value of ¥200,000

Figure 6 ‐ Canary Wharf, London

82

82

construction after breeding season (Grant, 2006). A number of developments within the Thames docklands proceeded against environmental protests, yet positively some early dockland projects engaged with local ecologists and the 1996 London Biodiversity Partnership, to create environmentally sensitive structures. Early examples are the Greenwich 2000 project, the Creekside Centre and the highly regarded Laban Dance Centre (Gedge D. , 2002). The success of reconciling building projects and local ecology within these projects at Deptford Creek became a feature of the 2002 England Biodiversity Strategy (DEFRA, 2003). Thanks to the public interest in the Black Redstart and the success of dockland ecological roofing projects; the green roof movement in London is focused on biodiversity benefits. The dominance of biodiversity policy within the London docklands area differs from other UK legalisation regarding green roofs. However it is important to note that there is no overarching green roof policy in London, as in Berlin and Tokyo (Earth Pledge, 2005). Interestingly green roofs have been more readily promoted by private developers, motivated by a combination of aesthetic and ecological concerns. The private developers of Canary Wharf have retrofit some of the areas skyscrapers green under the advisement of ecologist in addition to implementing a local green roof action plan. In 2001, 5,000m2 of green roofs were installed throughout Canary Wharf and the development possesses the highest green roof in Europe, at the 32 story Barclays HQ at One Churchill Place (Gedge, 2008). A positive recent policy development comes in the form of the Biodiversity Action Plan for the London 2012 Olympics. The various stadiums and athletes village developments aim to construct at least 0.4ha (4,000m2) of green roofs (Olympic Delivery Authority, 2008). London is an example of green roof policy which heavily promotes the ecological and biodiversity attributes of adopting green roofs. However the actual implementation of green roofing and building policy with London is not as robust as Berlin or Tokyo (Earth Pledge, 2005). But does showcase that private developers can promote green roofs independently for a local authority (Gedge, 2008). Implication for Northern Ireland The principle similarity of the methods to promoting green roofs discussed is the combination of some form of government funding and a need to meet an environmental concern (Koehler & Schmidt, 1997; Tokyo Metropolitan Government, 2002). Berlin shows the success in providing government grant and countering this with rising municipal rates to change building trends (Gedge & Kadas, 2005). The example of Tokyo illustrates an alternative to grants, by imposing building penalty fees and allowing private sector developer to adapt to a force change in the building market (Morishita, 2002). Northern Ireland can take inspiration for both approaches to develop a system which suits the distinct requirement of the local building fabric. The development of green roofs along the London docklands demonstrates a methodology where a local authority takes a secondary role in the development of ecological roofs (Earth Pledge, 2005). The installation of green roofs in the Deptford Creek area was due to pressures place on developers by local environmental activists. While green roofs are not as

83

83

popular in London as Berlin and Tokyo (Gedge, 2008), it is possible for green roofs to gain favour without the backing of local government. If green roof are to be promoted by national or local policies in Northern Ireland, they must be in keeping with the existing environmental and biodiversity strategies namely the Environment (Northern Ireland) Order 2002, the Northern Ireland Biodiversity Action Plan and the Northern Ireland Biodiversity Strategy (NIEA, 2010).

84

84



Coastal Vegetation

Arid Vegetation

Reed Bed Vegetation





Roofs






Woodland Habitats


Oakwood

Grassland Habitats




Mountainous Heaths

Peatland Habitats


Fens


Roofs

Coastal Habitats

Wetland Habitats

Woodland Habitats

Grassland Habitats

Heathland Habitats



Coastal Habitats

Grassland Habitats

Heathland Habitats

85

85

Conclusions Are Green Roofs a Practical Ecological Recourse for Northern Ireland?

86

86

The purpose of this report was to investigate the potential of green roofs to address habitat loss in Northern Ireland. By exploring the factors contributing to habitat loss, the characteristics that differentiates individual ecosystem and the ecological traits of Northern Ireland’s urban centres; this report intended to explore whether these attributes were compatible with the known biological qualities of green roofing systems. The number of complete green roofs in Northern Ireland is low as a percentage of our overall building stock while habitats on rooftops are more common in other parts of the world, particularly central Europe (Dunnett & Kingsbury, 2008). The concept of using green roofs to reinforce local ecology has been tried and tested in numerous studies in multiple cities (Brenneisen S. , 2006; Frith & Gedge, 2000). Because of the case studies presented in chapter 3 and 4, it is has been established that green roofs, given the appropriate substrate and design (Köhler, 2006), can prove to be an invaluable resource to local flora and fauna (Grant, 2006). Due to the wealth of precedence on artificial habitats created on green roof, some of which are discussed in chapter 1 and 3, this report has extensively addressed the issue of whether or not a green roof ‘can’ mimic a natural ecosystem. The examples of the Laban Dance Centre in London, ACROS Centre in Fukuoka Japan, and the Moos Water Filtration Plant near Zurich, discussed in sections 3‐01, 3‐02 and 3‐05 respectively, has shown the readiness for both native flora and fauna species to be both supported by and enhanced by green roofs though active colonization (Clement & Foster, 1994; Frith & Gedge, 2000). The remaining issue of how can Northern Ireland utilise green roofing methods to address the environmental requirements of its native environments shall now be discussed.

Figure 1 ‐ View of the David Kier Building and the greater Belfast area

Cn‐01 Habitat Green Roof for Northern Ireland The combined content of chapters 1, 2 and 3 generated a list of habitats that can occupy green roof environments while remaining ecologically viable. The analysis and discussion of chapter 4 further refined this list of possible habitats into ecosystems that are structurally feasible and cost effective to the majority of the built environment within Northern Ireland’s urban settings.

87

87

The natural habitats associated with Coastal, Heathland and Grassland environments are the biological networks that present the most opportunity for the adoption to a rooftop situation in Northern Ireland.

The potential of these habitats to be adapted to existing roof structure throughout Northern Ireland is the primary reason that this report highlights them as possessing the greatest potential to meet the needs to counteract natural habitat loss or support existing ecosystems. Coastal and Heather habitats are capable of existing on extremely lightweight structures and grassland habitats requiring lightweight to medium strength structure depending on the type of soil substrates required (Adler, 1999; Dunnett & Kingsbury, 2008). Similarly the financial costs of Coastal and Heather habitats are extremely low with grasslands being low to medium in the spectrum of building expenditures (Earth Pledge, 2005). The three habitat types described represent the most effective habitats to be implemented on the majority of green roof conversion projects in Northern Ireland. The number of research projects (Snepa, Van Ierland, & Opdama, 2009; Grant, 2006), lessons from the building laws of Basil, Berlin and Tokyo and private developments such as Canary Wharf the planned Wood Wharf parks (Brenneisen S. , 2006; Earth Pledge, 2005) have shown that urban expansion can be integrated with ecologically considered greening mechanisms. Additionally, studies have proven that adding extensive green roofs on industrial and commercial land on the outskirts of residential areas (briefly discussed in section In‐01) , can greatly improve the ecological resources in an urban area (Brenneisen S. , 2006), and this policy could be encouraged in Northern Ireland. The size restriction of habitat green roofs is one of their primary limiting factors (Brenneisen & Hänggi, 2006). The close proximity of building and typically common ownership at some period in the developments construction, presents opportunities for a mosaic of habitat green roofs to be created on industrial parks (Snepa, Van Ierland, & Opdama, 2009). Previous research has shown that the combination of small green roofs to create habitat corridors will significantly contribution to wider environmental quality (Grant, Engleback, & Nicholson, 2003). These factors further reinforce the ability of Coastal, Heathland and Grassland habitats to become a potential part of Northern Ireland’s urban environments.

Figure 5 ‐Wood Wharf, London

Coastal Habitats Grassland Habitats Heathland Habitats

Figure 2 ‐ Costal Meadow grasses planted on

the Nassau Icehouse Brewery Figure 3 ‐ Grass sloped roof on the Vancouver

Conference CentreFigure 4 ‐ Heath Planting on Sloped Roof at

Schiphol Plaza, Amsterdam Airport

88

88

Cn‐02 Potential Benefits of Green Roof to Northern Ireland’s Bird Populations Many natural habitats in Northern Ireland are critical to a variety of avian species, nationally supporting over 200 bird species, not including rare and migratory species (Biodiversity NI, 2011). There has been widespread decline in the bird population of Northern Ireland, the common House Sparrow has declined 19% during 1994‐2006 and the Curlew, Snipe, Redneck and Lepwing species have declined by over 50% in the last 20 years (NIEA, 2010). It is estimated that the total number of birds in the UK has reduced by 6% in the last 30 years (Defra, March 2008), with the RSPB recording a decrease of 40% in farmland bird populations over the same period (RSPB, 2006). Examples of completed projects in chapter 3 have shown the adaptability of bird species to green roof habitats. Additionally, as mentioned in section Cn‐01, there is research supporting extensive green roofs in industrial estates and business parks as high value ecological resources for local bird populations (Brenneisen S. , 2006). Many of Northern Ireland’s towns, which are in the breeding and feeding range of migratory and native birds,

can be retrofitted to support these populations. Buildings such as the Clinic One at University Hospital of Basel, Laban Dance Centre in London and the Ducks Unlimited National Headquarters and Conservation Centre in Winnipeg, described in section 3‐01, 3‐01 and 3‐05 respectively, illustrate the ability of birds to dominate roof spaces which resemble their natural habitat. Green roofs have the potential to play an important role in Northern Ireland’s bird conservation schemes, especially in urban centre. The value of green roofs to bird populations is already recognised by the RSPB, who have issued guidelines for bird habitats on green roofs (RSPB, 2011). Cn‐03 Envisioned Setback to Green Roof development in Northern Ireland While it is the opinion of the researcher that green roofs present a clear potential for the creation of natural habitats in the urban areas of Northern Ireland, there are a number of obstacles that are currently preventing any wide scale adoption of green roofing systems Commercial Planting opposed to Natural Planting The most extensively used planting on green roofs in the northern hemisphere is sedum, due to their shallow rooting, tolerance to cold and drought (Snodgrass. & Snodgrass, 2006). Even intensive roofing system use a selection of commercially available grass, mosses and herbs (Dunnett & Kingsbury, 2008). Internationally there exist different policies on the importance of using native planning on green roofs. One school of thought is the use of local soil and vegetation will encourage the development of habitation of a rooftop (Brenneisen, 2006), with the opposing methodology stating that rooftops possess different micro‐climates to ground level habitats and should be treated as such (Dunnett N. , 2006). Regardless of this debate, the current commercial available planting systems produced by Northern Ireland’s horticultural industry are dominated by sedum

Figure 6 ‐Wildwood Community College, Missouri, USA

Figure 7 ‐Modular Green Roofing System

89

89

species, with supplementary variants of wildflowers and meadow grass (Green Roofs Ireland, 2010). Many ecological reports support the replacement of sedum roofs with local groundcover planting (Grant G. , 2006), however commercially Northern Ireland is not in a position to meet this request. The approach of National Trust Visitor Centre at Portstewart Strand, described in section 3‐01, illustrates a stop gap solution to the lack of native planting available for green roofing. The building uses a sedum roof which is expected to become colonised and hopefully dominated by the surrounding native sand dune grasses (GreenRoof, 2010). Until native species are introduced to commercial horticulture in Northern Ireland, green roofs will be dominated by alien vegetation. Lack of Social Drivers for Green Roof Adoption The rapid adoption of green roofs in cities such as Berlin and Tokyo was made possible through the culmination of social, political and financial drivers (Earth Pledge, 2005). It is the view of the researcher that the current socio‐political climate of Northern Ireland does not support the possibility of any form of large scale adoption or favouring of green roofs. The water saving qualities of greening roofs are irrelevant to Northern Ireland. Water charges in Northern Ireland are based around three models; a standing charge based on supply pipe size; a variable charge based on the volume of water used; or unmeasured and a fixed standing charge is issued (NI Water, 2011). So there is no financial incentive for build occupant to commission green roofs because there are no financial penalties for excessive rainwater runoff. Secondly the climate of Northern Ireland and the small scale, low height and low density of its urban areas does not produce excessive ‘heat islands’. The ‘heat islands’ of Northern Ireland are considered to be 1oC for small town, and Belfast is believed to have a 2oC heat island effect (Morris, 2007). This is softened by the temperature range of Northern Ireland and the future effects of climate change, which has been predicted as much smaller in Ireland than in Britain (Coll, Maguire, & Sweeney, 2009). Resulting in a low probability for green roofs to be widely implemented in Northern Ireland in order to combated excessive summer temperatures. The only remaining socio‐political concern that can affect any future urban greening policy is one based on promoting biodiversity and urban wildlife. The current political landscape does not present any strong champions for this agenda. Because of these factors the political and social environment does not look likely to promote any urban greening methods in the near future. Cn‐04 Concluding Statement The goal of this report was to ascertain if green roofs could play a role in addressing habitat loss in Northern Ireland. And the content of this report has provided adequate evidence that they are capable of supporting a range of habitats of Northern Ireland that are currently threatened in their natural settings. While arguments can be made for the ability of green roofs to sustain replicant habitats of Woodland and Wetlands districts, the potential of Coastal, Heathland and Grassland environments to be applied to existing structures across Northern Ireland elevates these habitats as the principle candidates for habitat reconstruction in urban areas. Additionally the opportunity of green roofs in Northern Ireland to provide safe breeding ground for

90

90

internationally important bird populations is a valid reason in itself to promote green roof adoption. However, without some form of government support, either in the form of grants or favourable building policies, the wide scale implementation of a habitat focused green roofs will find a limited appeal about the Northern Ireland populace. A study commissioned by English Nature and published in 2003 concluded that “Although individual green roofs offer local environmental benefits, any significant contribution to wider environmental quality is only likely to become apparent once a more substantial area of town and city roof space has been greened. Such a programme will require political commitment and concerted action underpinned by science, technical expertise and good design. In order to refine the design of green roofs for biodiversity conservation, some further research and experimentation is required.” (Grant, Engleback, & Nicholson, 2003) This statement accurately describes the current status of green roofs in Northern Ireland.

Coastal Habitats Grassland Habitats Heather HabitatsSand Dunes Lowland Grasslands Calcareous Grasslands Lowland Heaths

Figure 8 ‐ Murlough Dunes, Dundrum Bay

Figure 9 ‐ Wangford Warren, Suffolk Figure 10 ‐ Little Deer Park, Antrim Figure 11 ‐ Murlough National Nature Reserve

Vegetated Shingles Lowland Meadows Rush Pastures Upland Heaths

Figure 12‐ Kearney, Down Figure 13 ‐ Tees Valley, Middlesbrough

Figure 14 ‐ Slievenacloy, Belfast Hills Figure 15 ‐ Bloody Bridge near Newcastle

Cliffs and Slopes Limestone Pavements Mountainous Heaths


Figure 17 ‐ Knockmore, Fermanagh Figure 18 ‐ Mourne Mountains

91

91

References

Adler, D. (1999). Metric Handbook: Planning and Design Data. Oxford: Architectural Press.

Alexandri, E., & Jones, P. (2008). Temperature decreases in an Urban Canyon due to Green Walls and Green Roofs in Diverse Climates. Building and Environment, 43, 480–493.

Bamber, R., Gilliland, P., & Shardlow, E. (2001). Saline Lagoons: A guide to their management and creation. London: English Nature.

Biodiversity NI. (2009, June 16). Shopping Safari. Retrieved July 11, 2011, from Biodiversity NI: http://www.biodiversityni.com/news_events.aspx?title=News&dataid=361966

Biodiversity NI. (2011). Biodiversity. Retrieved June 16, 2011, from Biodiversity Northern Ireland: http://www.biodiversityni.com/biodiversity.aspx

Blythe, E., & Merhaut, D. (2007). Grouping and comparison of container substrates based on physical properties using exploratory multivariate statistical methods. Hortscience 42(2): 353‐363., 2(42), 353‐363.

Boivin, M., Lamy, M., Gosselin, A., & Dansereau, B. (2001). Effect of Artificial Substrate Depth on Frezing Injury of Six Herbaceous Perennials Grown in a Green Roof System. Hort Technology, 2, 409‐412.

Boyde, J. (2011, August 22). Marketing Co‐ordinator; Lisburn City Council. (N. Hughes, Interviewer)

Brenneisen, S. (2001). Vögel, Käfer und Spinnen auf Dachbegrünungen— Nutzungsmöglichkeiten und Einrichtungsoptimierungen. Basel, Switzerland: Geographisches Institut Universität Basel and Baudepartement des Kantons Basel‐Stadt. Basel, Switzerland: Geographisches Institut Universität Basel and Baudepartement des Kantons Basel‐Stadt.

Brenneisen, S. (2005). Biodiversity Strategy on Green Roofs. 3rd Annual Greening Rooftops for Sustainable Cities. Washington DC: Green Roofs for Healthy Cities.

Brenneisen, S. (2006, December). Space for Urban Wildlife: Designing Green Roofs as Habitats in Switzerland. Urban Habitats, 4(1), 27‐36.

Brenneisen, S. (2006, December). Space for Urban Wildlife: Designing Green Roofs as Habitats in Switzerland. Urban Habitats, Volume 4(Number 1), 27‐36.

Brenneisen, S. (2006, December). Space for Urban Wildlife: Designing Green Roofs as Habitats in Switzerland. Urban Habitats, Volume 4(Number 1), 27.

Brenneisen, S., & Hänggi, A. (2006). Begrünte Dächer—ökofaunistische Charakterisierung eines neuen Habitattyps in Siedlungsgebieten anhand eines Vergleichs der Spinnenfauna von Dachbegrünungen mit naturschutzrelevanten Bahnarealen in Basel. Mitteilungen der Naturforschenden Gesellschaften beider Basel, 9, 88–98.

Brooke, J. (2002, August 13). Heat Island: Tokyo is in Global Warning's Vanguard. New York Times.

Brookes, J. a. (1984). Designing with Plants 2: The Function of Plants. Architects Journal.

Budge, D. M. (2009, August 2). Vancouver's 6 Acre Living Green Roof. Retrieved August 11, 2011, from Youtube: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OX0JHdVd27o

Burgess, H. (2004, May). An assessment of the potential of green roofs for bird conservation in the UK. Submitted for the assessment of BSc Hons Geography.

92

92

CABE. (2005). Does money grow on trees? London: Commission for Architecture and the Built Environment.

City of Chicago. (2010). Monitoring the City Hall Rooftop Garden's Benefit. Retrieved August 21, 2011, from City of Chicago Office Site: http://www.cityofchicago.org/city/en/depts/doe/supp_info/monitoring_the_cityhallrooftopgardensbenefit.html

Clement, E., & Foster, M. (1994). Alien Plants of the British Isles. London: Botanical Society of the British Isles.

Coffman, R., & Davis, G. (2005). Insect and Avian Fauna Presence on Ford’s River Rouge Plant. Greening Rooftops for Sustainable Communities Conference. Washington D.C: Sustainable Communities Conference.

Coll, J., Maguire, C., & Sweeney, J. (2009). Biodiversity and Climate Change in Ireland. Maynooth & Belfast: Department of Geography & EnviroCentre.

Cooper, A., & McCann, T. (2001). The Northern Ireland Countryside Survey 2000. Belfast: Environment and Heritage Service.

Cooper, A., McCann, T., & Rogers, D. (2009). Northern Ireland Countryside Survey 2007. Belfast: Northern Ireland Environment Agency.

Coppin, N. a. (1990). Use of Vegetation in Civil Engineering. London: Construction Industry Research and Information Association.

Corbett, P. (2003). Grassland Habitats. Belfast: Environment and Heritage Service. Countryside Survey. (2008). Countryside Survey: UK Results from 2007. Lancaster:

Natural Environment Research Council. Crowther, D. (1994). Health Considerations in House Design. Cambridge: Cambridge

University. CVNI. (2011). Priority Habitats ‐ Coastal ‐ Coastal Sand Dunes. Retrieved July 20,

2011, from Conservation Volunteers Northern Ireland: http://www.cvni.org/biodiversity/index.php/Habitats/habitat/coastal_sand_dunes/

CVNI. (2011). Priority Habitats ‐ Coastal ‐ Maritime Cliffs and Slopes. Retrieved July 20, 2011, from Conservation Volunteers Northern Ireland: http://www.cvni.org/biodiversity/index.php/Habitats/habitat/maritime_cliffs_and_slopes/

CVNI. (2011). Priority Habitats ‐ Coastal ‐ Seagrass Beds. Retrieved July 20, 2011, from Conservation Volunteers Northern Ireland: http://www.cvni.org/biodiversity/index.php/Habitats/habitat/seagrass_beds/

CVNI. (2011). Priority Habitats ‐ Coastal ‐ Sublittoral Sands and Gravels. Retrieved July 20, 2011, from Conservation Volunteers Northern Ireland: http://www.cvni.org/biodiversity/index.php/Habitats/habitat/sublittoral_sands_and_gravels/

CVNI. (2011). Priority Habitats ‐ Grassland ‐ Calcareous Grassland. Retrieved July 20, 2011, from Conservation Volunteers Northern Ireland: http://www.cvni.org/biodiversity/index.php/Habitats/habitat/calcareous_grassland/

CVNI. (2011). Priority Habitats ‐ Grassland ‐ Limestone Pavement. Retrieved July 20, 2011, from Conservation Volunteers Northern Ireland: http://www.cvni.org/biodiversity/index.php/Habitats/habitat/limestone_pavement/

CVNI. (2011). Priority Habitats ‐ Marine ‐ Saline Lagoons. Retrieved July 20, 2011, from Conservation Volunteers Northern Ireland: http://www.cvni.org/biodiversity/index.php/Habitats/habitat/saline_lagoons/

CVNI. (2011). Priority Habitats ‐ Peatland ‐ Lowland Heathland. Retrieved July 20, 2011, from Conservation Volunteers Northern Ireland: http://www.cvni.org/biodiversity/index.php/Habitats/habitat/lowland_heathland/

93

93

CVNI. (2011). Priority Habitats ‐ Peatland ‐ Lowland Raised Bogs. Retrieved July 20, 2011, from Conservation Volunteers Northern Ireland: http://www.cvni.org/biodiversity/index.php/Habitats/habitat/lowland_raised_bogs/

CVNI. (2011). Priority Habitats ‐ Wetland ‐ Eutrophic Standing Water. Retrieved July 20, 2011, from Conservation Volunteers Northern Ireland: http://www.cvni.org/biodiversity/index.php/Habitats/habitat/eutrophic_standing_water/

CVNI. (2011). Priority Habitats ‐ Wetland ‐ Fens. Retrieved July 20, 2011, from Conservation Volunteers Northern Ireland: http://www.cvni.org/biodiversity/index.php/Habitats/habitat/fens/

CVNI. (2011). Priority Habitats ‐ Wetland ‐Reed Bed. Retrieved July 20, 2011, from Conservation Volunteers Northern Ireland: http://www.cvni.org/biodiversity/index.php/Habitats/habitat/reed_bed/

CVNI. (2011). Priority Habitats ‐ Woodland ‐ Oakwood. Retrieved July 20, 2011, from Conservation Volunteers Northern Ireland: http://www.cvni.org/biodiversity/index.php/Habitats/habitat/oakwood/

Darius, F., & Drepper, J. (1984). Rasendaecher in West Berlin. Das Gartenamt, 33, 5; 309‐315.

DEFRA. (2003). Working with the Grain of Nature. London: Department for the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs.

Defra. (April 2008). Populations of Butterflies in England. London: Engalnd Biodiversity Strategy Indicators.

Defra. (March 2008). Populations of Wild Birds in England. . London: England Biodiversity Strategy Indicators.

Defra. (May 2006). The UK Biodiversity Action Plan: Highlights from the 2005. London: UK Biodiversity Partnership.

Den Hartog, C. (1970). The Seagrasses of the World. Amsterdam: North Holland. Deplazes, A. (2008). Constructing Architecture: Materials, Processes, Structures; a

Handbook. Zurich: Birkhauser Verlag. Doernach, R. (1979). On the Use of Biotectural Systems. Gardens and Landscaping,

452‐457. Dunnett, N. (2006). Green Roofs for Biodiversity: Reconciling Aesthetics with

Ecology. Fourth Annual Greening Rooftops for Sustainable Communities Conference, Awards and Trade Show. Boston: The Cardinal Group.

Dunnett, N. (2006). Sheffield’sGreenRoofForum: A Multi‐Stranded Programme of Green Roof Infrastructure Development for the UK. Fourth Annual Greening Rooftops for Sustainable Communities Conference, Awards and Trade Show. Boston: The Cardinal Group.

Dunnett, N., & Kingsbury, N. (2004). Planting Green Roofs and Living Walls. Portland: Timber Press.

Dunnett, N., & Kingsbury, N. (2008). Planting Green Roofs and Living Walls. Cambridge.: Timber Press.





94

94

Earth Pledge. (2005). Green Roofs: Ecological Design and Construction. Surrey, England: Schiffer.

Earth Pledge. (2005). Green Roofs: Ecological Design and Construction. Atglen, Pennsylvania : Schiffer Books.

Emilsson, T. (2003). The Influence of Establishment Method and Species Mix on Plant Cover. Greening Rooftops for Sustainable Communities. Toronto: The Cardinal Group.

FLL. (2002). Guideline for the Planning, Execution and Upkeep of Green‐roof Sites. Bonn: Forschungsgesellschaft Landschaftsentwicklung Landschaftsbau.

Francis, R. A., & Lorimer, J. (2011, January). Urban Reconciliation Ecology: The potential of living roofs and walls. Journal of Environmental Management, 92, 1429‐1437.

Frazer, L. (2005). Porous Pavements. Boca Raton, Florida: CRC Press. Frazer, L. (2005). Porous Pavements. Boca Raton, Florida: CRC Press. Frith, M., & Gedge, D. (2000). The black redstart in urban Britain; a conservation

conundrum? British Wildlife, 8, 381–388. Gates, D. (1980). Biophysical Ecology. New York: Springer. Gedge, D. (2002). Roofspace: a place for brownfield biodiversity? Ecos, 22, (3/4), 69–

74. Gedge, D. (2008, September). Promoting Green Roofs and Biodiversity. Retrieved

September 02, 2011, from Green Roofs and Biodiversity: http://www.dustygedge.com/greenroofs.html

Gedge, D., & Kadas, G. (2005, July). Green Roofs and Biodiversity. Biologist, 52(3), 161‐169.

Getter, K. L., Rowe, D. B., Robertson, G. P., Cregg, B. M., & Andresen, J. A. (2009). Carbon Sequestration Potential of Extensive Green Roofs. Environmental Science & Technology(43), pp. 7564‐7570.

Getter, K., Rowe, D., Robertson, G., Cregg, B., & Andresen, J. (2009). Carbon Sequestration Potential of Extensive Greenroofs. Environmenta lScience and Technology, 43, 7564–7570.

Gibson, C. (1998). Brownfield Red Data: The values Artificial Habitats have for Uncommon Invertebrates. English Nature, Research Report No.273.

Gilbert, O. L., & Anderson, P. (1998). Habitat Creation and Repair. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Graceson, A., Hare, M., Hall, N., & Monaghan, J. (2011). Characterising the mineral components of green roof growing media. 1st National Green Roof Student Conference (pp. 1‐9). Sheffield: University of Sheffield.

Graceson, A., Hare, M., Hall, N., & Monaghan, J. (2011). Characterising the mineral components of green roof growing media. 1st National Green Roof Student Conference. Sheffield: University Of Sheffield.

Graceson, A., Hare, M., Hall, N., & Monaghan, J. (2011). Characterising the mineral components of green roof growing media. 1st National Green Roof Student Conference. Sheffield: School of Architecture, The University of Sheffield.

Grant, G. (2006). Extensive Green Roofs in London. Urban Habitats, 4, 51‐65. Grant, G. (2006, December). Extensive Green Roofs in London. Urban Habitats, 4,

pp. 51‐65. Grant, G., Engleback, L., & Nicholson, B. (2003). Green roofs: their existing status and

potential for conserving biodiversity in urban areas. English Nature(Research Report), p. Report No 498.

95

95

Green Roofs Ireland. (2010). Plants. Retrieved September 03, 2011, from Green Roofs Ireland: http://www.greenroofsireland.co.uk/

GreenRoof. (2010). ACROS Fukuoka Prefectural International Hall. Retrieved August 8, 2011, from GreenRoof.com: http://www.greenroofs.com/projects/pview.php?id=476

GreenRoof. (2010). BMW Düsseldorf Office Building. Retrieved August 8, 2011, from GreenRoof.com: http://www.greenroofs.com/projects/pview.php?id=500

GreenRoof. (2010). Chicago City Hall. Retrieved August 8, 2011, from GreenRoof.com: http://www.greenroofs.com/projects/pview.php?id=21

GreenRoof. (2010). Ducks Unlimited Canada National HQ & Oak Hammock Marsh Interpretive Centre. Retrieved August 8, 2011, from GreenRoof.com: http://www.greenroofs.com/projects/pview.php?id=463

GreenRoof. (2010). Gallie Craig Coffee Shop. Retrieved August 8, 2011, from GreenRoof.com: http://www.greenroofs.com/projects/pview.php?id=312

GreenRoof. (2010). Heinz 57 Center/Gimbels Building Restoration. Retrieved August 8, 2011, from GreenRoof.com: http://www.greenroofs.com/projects/pview.php?id=159

GreenRoof. (2010). Laban Dance Centre. Retrieved August 8, 2011, from GreenRoof.com: http://www.greenroofs.com/projects/pview.php?id=549

GreenRoof. (2010). Life Expression Wellness Center. Retrieved August 8, 2011, from GreenRoof.com: http://www.greenroofs.com/projects/pview.php?id=80

GreenRoof. (2010). Moos Water Filtration Plant . Retrieved August 8, 2011, from GreenRoof.com: http://www.greenroofs.com/projects/pview.php?id=680

GreenRoof. (2010). National Trust Visitor Centre at Portstewart Strand. Retrieved August 8, 2011, from GreenRoof.com: http://www.greenroofs.com/projects/pview.php?id=904

GreenRoof. (2010). North German Bank ‐ NordLB. Retrieved August 8, 2011, from GreenRoof.com: http://www.greenroofs.com/projects/pview.php?id=112

GreenRoof. (2010). Schiphol Plaza at AMS. Retrieved August 8, 2011, from GreenRoof.com: http://www.greenroofs.com/projects/pview.php?id=87

GreenRoof. (2010). Vancouver Convention Centre Expansion Project. Retrieved August 8, 2011, from GreenRoof.com: http://www.greenroofs.com/projects/pview.php?id=545

Groundwork. (2011). Green Roof Code of Best Practice for the UK. Sheffield: Groundwork Sheffield & Environment Agency.

Harvey, P. (2001). The East Thames Corridor: A Nationally Important Invertebrate Fauna Under Threat. British Wildlife, 12, 91‐98.

Hitchmough, J. (1994). Urban Landscaping Management. Sydney: Incata Press. Ingelmo, F., Canet, R., Ibañez, M. A., Pomares, F., & García, J. (1998, February). Use

of MSW compost, dried sewage sludge and other wastes as partial substitutes for peat and soil. Bioresource Technology, 63(2), 123‐129 .

Johnston, J. (1993). Building Green : a guide to using plants on roofs, walls and pavements. London: London Ecology Unit.

Jókövi, E., Bervaes, J., & Böttcher, S. (2002). Recreational use of green business sites: an inventory of the opinions of employees and neighbours [in Dutch]. Wageningen: Alterra Report 518. Alterra, Wageningen University and Research Centre.

Jones, R. A. (2002). Tecticolous invertebrates: A preliminary investigation of the invertebrate fauna on ecoroofs in urban London. English Nature.

Kadas, G. (2006, December). Rare Invertebrates Colonizing Green Roofs in London. Urban Habitats, Volume 4(Number 1), 66.

96

96

Keeley, M. (2003). Green Roof Incentives:Tried and true Techniques from Europe. Toronto: Green Roofs for Healthy Cities.

Keeping, M. &. (1996). The ‘Green’ Refurbishment of Commercial Property. Facilities, Vol. 14 Iss: 3/4, 15 ‐ 19.

Kingsbury, N. (2001, June). Roofing veldt. The Garden, 446‐449. Koehler, M., & Schmidt, M. (1997). Hof, Fassaden und Dachbegruenung.

Landschaftsentwicklung und Umweltforschung, 105, 1‐177. Köhler, M. (2006, December). Long‐Term Vegetation Research on Two Extensive

Green Roofs in Berlin. Urban Habitats, 4(1), 3‐26. Kӧhler, M. (1989). Ecological Analysis of Extensive Green Roofs. Letters to the Society

for Ecology, 249‐255. Landolt, E. (2001). Orchideen‐Wiesen in Wollishofen (Zürich): ein erstaunliches

Relikt aus dem Anfang des 20. Jahrhunderts. Vierteljahresschrift der Naturforschenden Gesellschaft in Zürich, 146(2–3), 41–51.

Larson, D. W., Matthes, U., Kelly, P., Lundholm, J., & Gerrath, J. (2004). The Urban Cliff Revolution. Toronto: Fitzhenry & Whiteside.

Lundholm, J. (2006). Green Roofs and Facades: a Habitat Template Approach. Urban Habitats, 4, 87–101.

Lundholm, J., & Marlin, A. (2006). Habitat origins and microhabitat preferences of urban plant species. Urban Ecosystems, 9, 139–159.

Margerison, C. (2008). A Response from the British Ecological Society and the Institute of Biology to the Environmental Audit Committee Inquiry in to ‘Halting UK Biodiversity Loss’. London: The British Ecological Society.

Miller, C. (2003). Moisture Mamagement in Green Roofs. Greening Rooftops for Sustainable Communities. Toronto: The Cardinal Group.

Morishita, Y. (2002, March 19). Interest in Growing in Roof Gardens. The Yomiuri Shimbun.

Morris, C. (2007). Fuel Poverty, Climate and Mortality in Northern Ireland 1980‐2006. Belfast: Northern Ireland Statistics and Research Agency.

MOSS. (2002). Management of Sensitive Sites: Explanatory Leaflet. Belfast: Environment and Heritage Service.

MOSS. (2009). Management of Sensitive Sites Habitat Sheet ‐ Coastal. Belfast: Department of the Environment.

MOSS. (2009). Management of Sensitive Sites Habitat Sheet ‐ Woodlands. Belfast: Department of the Environment.

MSNBC News. (2002, August 21). Tokyo turns rooftops into gardens. Retrieved September 02, 2011, from Heat Island Effect: http://www.voy.com/61461/145.html

Murray, R., McCann, T., & Cooper, A. (1992). A Land Classification and Landscape Ecological Study of Northern Ireland. University of Ulster, Coleraine: Department of the Environment NI and Department of Environmental Studies.

National Archives. (1995, December). UK Biodiversity Action Plan. Retrieved August 22, 2011, from Habitat Statement: http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20110303145213/http://ukbap.org.uk/UKPlans.aspx?ID=754

National Museums Northern Ireland. (2010). Native woodland. Retrieved July 19, 2011, from Flora of Northern Ireland: http://www.habitas.org.uk/flora/habitats/nativewoodland.htm

National Museums Northern Ireland. (2010). Sea Cliffs. Retrieved July 19, 2011, from Flora of Northern Ireland: http://www.habitas.org.uk/flora/habitats/seacliff.htm

97

97

Natural Economy Northwest. (2008). The economic value of green infrastructure. London: Natural Economy Northwest.

NI Water. (2011). Water Charges. Retrieved September 04, 2011, from Northern Ireland Water: http://www.niwater.com/watercharges.asp

NIEA. (2002). Northern Ireland Biodiversity Strategy. Belfast: Department of the Environment.

NIEA. (2005, March). Northern Ireland Habitat Action Plan: Calcareous Grassland. Retrieved June 13, 2011, from Northern Ireland Environment Agency: http://www.doeni.gov.uk/niea/calcareousgrass_pdf.pdf

NIEA. (2007). Northern Ireland Countryside Survey. Belfast: Northern Ireland Environment Agency.

NIEA. (2010, July 20). Coast & Sea. Retrieved July 18, 2011, from Northern Ireland Environment Agency: http://www.doeni.gov.uk/niea/biodiversity/habitats‐2/coast.htm

NIEA. (2010, March 19). Farmlands and Grasslands . Retrieved July 18, 2011, from Northern Ireland Environment Agency: http://www.doeni.gov.uk/niea/biodiversity/habitats‐2/farmlands_and_grasslands.htm

NIEA. (2010, March 18). Freshwater and Wetlands. Retrieved July 18, 2011, from Northern Ireland Environment Agency: http://www.doeni.gov.uk/niea/biodiversity/habitats‐2/freshwater_and_wetlands.htm

NIEA. (2010, March 19). Heathlands. Retrieved July 18, 2011, from Northern Ireland Environment Agency: http://www.doeni.gov.uk/niea/biodiversity/habitats‐2/heathlands.htm

NIEA. (2010, April 29). Information for the General Public. Retrieved September 02, 2011, from Northern Ireland Environment Agency: http://www.doeni.gov.uk/niea/de/general_public.htm

NIEA. (2010, March 19). Lowland Dry Acid Grasslands. Retrieved July 23, 2011, from Northern Ireland Environment Agency: http://www.doeni.gov.uk/niea/biodiversity/habitats‐2/farmlands_and_grasslands/lowland_dry_acid_grasslands.htm

NIEA. (2010, March 11). Lowland Heath. Retrieved July 18, 2011, from Northern Ireland Environment Agency: http://www.doeni.gov.uk/niea/biodiversity/habitats‐2/heathlands/lowland_heath.htm

NIEA. (2010, July 20). Marine Habitats. Retrieved July 18, 2011, from Northern Ireland Environment Agency: http://www.doeni.gov.uk/niea/biodiversity/habitats‐2/coast/marinehabitats.htm

NIEA. (2010, March 19). Montane Heath. Retrieved July 18, 2011, from Northern Ireland Environment Agency: http://www.doeni.gov.uk/niea/biodiversity/habitats‐2/heathlands/montane_heath.htm

NIEA. (2010). Northern Ireland Priority Habitats. Belfast: Northern Ireland Enviroment Agency.

NIEA. (2010, March 19). Peatlands. Retrieved July 18, 2011, from Northern Ireland Environment Agency: http://www.doeni.gov.uk/niea/biodiversity/habitats‐2/peatlands.htm

NIEA. (2010, March 30). Species. Retrieved July 12, 2011, from Northern Ireland Environment Agency: http://www.doeni.gov.uk/niea/biodiversity/sap_uk.htm

NIEA. (2010, March 11). Upland Heath. Retrieved July 18, 2011, from Northern Ireland Environment Agency: http://www.doeni.gov.uk/niea/biodiversity/habitats‐2/heathlands/upland_heath.htm

98

98

NIEA. (2010, March 19). Urban Biodiversity. Retrieved Ausust 12, 2011, from Northern Ireland Environment Agency: http://www.doeni.gov.uk/niea/de/biodiversity/habitats‐2/urban_biodiversity.htm

NIEA. (2010, March 18). Woodlands. Retrieved July 18, 2011, from Northern Ireland Environment Agency: http://www.doeni.gov.uk/niea/biodiversity/habitats‐2/woodlands.htm

Northern Ireland Habitat Action Plan. (2003). Blanket Bog. Belfast: Northern Ireland Environment Agency.

Northern Ireland Habitat Action Plan. (2003). Lowland Heathland. Belfast: Northern Ireland Environment Agency.

Northern Ireland Habitat Action Plan. (2003). Lowland Raised Bog. Belfast: Northern Ireland Environment Agency.

Northern Ireland Habitat Action Plan. (2003). Mudflats. Belfast: Northern Ireland Environment Agency.

Northern Ireland Habitat Action Plan. (2003). Seagrass Beds. Belfast: Northern Ireland Environment Agency.

Northern Ireland Habitat Action Plan. (2003). Upland Heathland. Belfast: Northern Ireland Environment Agency.

Northern Ireland Habitat Action Plan. (2005). Calcareous Grassland. Belfast: Northern Ireland Environment Agency.

Northern Ireland Habitat Action Plan. (2005). Coastal and Floodplain Grazing Marsh. Belfast: Northern Ireland Environment Agency.

Northern Ireland Habitat Action Plan. (2005). Coastal Saltmarsh. Belfast: Northern Ireland Environment Agency.

Northern Ireland Habitat Action Plan. (2005). Coastal Sand Dunes. Belfast: Northern Ireland Environment Agency.

Northern Ireland Habitat Action Plan. (2005). Coastal Vegetated Shingle. Belfast: Northern Ireland Environment Agency.

Northern Ireland Habitat Action Plan. (2005). Eutrophic standing waters. Belfast: Northern Ireland Environment Agency.

Northern Ireland Habitat Action Plan. (2005). Fens. Belfast: Northern Ireland Environment Agency.

Northern Ireland Habitat Action Plan. (2005). Limestone Pavements. Belfast: Northern Ireland Environment Agency.

Northern Ireland Habitat Action Plan. (2005). Maritime Cliff and Slope. Belfast: Northern Ireland Environment Agency.

Northern Ireland Habitat Action Plan. (2005). Marl Lakes. Belfast: Northern Ireland Environment Agency.

Northern Ireland Habitat Action Plan. (2005). Mesotrophic Lakes. Belfast: Northern Ireland Environment Agency.

Northern Ireland Habitat Action Plan. (2005). Mixed Ashwoods . Belfast: Northern Ireland Environment Agency.

Northern Ireland Habitat Action Plan. (2005). Purple Moor‐grass and Rush Pastures. Belfast: Northern Ireland Environment Agency.

Northern Ireland Habitat Action Plan. (2005). Reed Beds. Belfast: Northern Ireland Environment Agency.

Northern Ireland Habitat Action Plan. (2005). Sublittoral Sands and Gravels. Belfast: Northern Ireland Environment Agency.

Northern Ireland Habitat Action Plan. (2005). Wet Woodland. Belfast: Northern Ireland Environment Agency.

99

99

Northern Ireland Native Woodland Group. (2008). Northern Ireland Native Woodland: Definitions and Guidance. Belfast: Forest Service NI.

Oberndorfer, E., Lundholm, J., Bass, B., Coffman, R., Doshi, H., Dunnett, N., et al. (2007). Green Roofs as Urban Ecosystems: Ecological Structures, Functions, and Services. Bioscience, 57, 823–833.

Olympic Delivery Authority. (2008). Olympic Park Biodiversity Action Plan. London: Organising Committee of the Olympic Games and Paralympic Games ltd.

Optigreen. (2011). Green Roof "Landscape Roof". Retrieved September 02, 2011, from System Solutions: http://www.optigreen‐greenroof.com/SystemSolutions/Landscape‐Roof.html

Optigreen. (2011). Green Roof "Light‐weight Roof". Retrieved September 02, 2011, from System Solutions: http://www.optigreen‐greenroof.com/SystemSolutions/Light‐weight‐Roof.html

Optigreen. (2011). Green Roof "Nature Roof". Retrieved September 02, 2011, from System Solutions: http://www.optigreen‐greenroof.com/SystemSolutions/Nature‐Roof.html

Optigreen. (2011). Green Roof "Pitched Roof". Retrieved September 02, 2011, from System Solutions: http://www.optigreen‐greenroof.com/SystemSolutions/Pitched‐Roof.html

OSNI. (2011). Map Console ‐ Digital Measurement. Retrieved August 19, 2011, from Ordnance Survey of Northern Ireland ‐ Map Shop: http://maps.osni.gov.uk/MapConsoleProducts.aspx?Category=Services&type=Digital%20Measurement

Peck, S., & Kuhn, M. (2000). Design Guidelines for Green Roof. Toronto: Environment Canada.

Pointer, G. (2005). Focus on People and Migration. London: The Office of National Statistics.

Porsche, U., & Köhler, M. (2003). Life cycle costs of green roofs: A comparison of Germany, USA, and Brazil. World Climate and Energy Event. Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.

Randall, R. E. (2004). Management of coastal vegetated shingle in the United Kingdom. Journal of Coastal Conservation, Volume 10, Number 1, 159‐168, DOI.

RSPB. (2006, September). Farmland birds and agri‐environment schemes in the New Member States. Retrieved June 13, 2011, from RSPB: http://www.rspb.org.uk/Images/crex_tcm9‐134831.pdf

RSPB. (2011, August 22). Protecting nest sites in roofs: Green Roofs. Retrieved September 02, 2011, from The Royal Society for the Protection of Birds: http://www.rspb.org.uk/advice/helpingbirds/roofs/green_roofs.aspx

Schmidt, M. &. (1990). The Importance of Roofs Covered with Vegetation for Urban Ecology. Building Green: A Guide to using Plants on Roofs, Walls and Pavements, 12.

Scholfield, J., & Waugh, M. (2003). Brownfield?, Greenfield?; The Threat to London's Unofficial Countryside. London: London Wildlife Trust.

Scholz‐Barth, K. (2001). Green Roofs: Stormwater Management from the Top Down. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 19(2), 2085‐2104.

Schradera, S., & Boningb, M. (2006). Soil formation on green roofs and its contribution to urban biodiversity with emphasis on Collembolans. Pedobiologia, 50, 347—356.

Scrivens, S. (1980). Derry and Toms: Case Study of Roof Gardens. Architects Journal. Skinner, C. J. (2006). Urban Density, Meteorology and Rooftops. Urban Policy and

Research, Volume 24(Issue 3), 355 ‐ 367 .

100

100

Snepa, R., Van Ierland, E., & Opdama, P. (2009). Enhancing biodiversity at business sites: What are the options, and which of these do stakeholders prefer? Landscape and Urban Planning(91), pp. 26–35.

Snodgrass., E., & Snodgrass, L. (2006). Green Roof Plants: a Resource and Planting Guide. Portland: TimberPress.

Szokolay, S. (2008). Introduction to Architectural Science: The Basis of Sustainable Design. Oxford: Architectural Press.

Tokyo Metropolitan Government. (2002). Rooftop Greenery Measures; The Environment in Tokyo. Tokyo: Tokyo Metropolitan Government.

Wheater, C. P. (1999). Urban Habitats. London: Routledge. White, J., & Snodgrass, E. (2003). Extensive Green Roof Plant Selection and

Characteristics. Greening Rooftops for Sustainable Communities. Toronto: The Cardinal Group.

Yoshimi, J., & Altan, H. (2011). Experimentations of the effects of green roofs on building thermal environments in a cold climate. 1st National Green Roof Student Conference. Sheffield: School of Architecture, The University of Sheffield.

ZinCo. (2011). Extensive Green Roofs. Retrieved August 11, 2011, from ZinCo Global Website: http://www.zinco‐greenroof.com/EN/greenroof_systems/extensive_green_roofs.php

101

101

Appendix A Detailed Descriptions of Northern Ireland’s Natural Habitats

102

102

Tidal Sandy, Shingle and Gravel Shores Coastal sandy and gravel shores occur in a wide variety of environments and are common in Northern Ireland waters (Northern Ireland Habitat Action Plan, 2005). The habitat develops in a range of physical environments, from sheltered beaches to mobile sandbanks. The sediments layer may be very thick but in large areas of Northern Ireland, may only form small deposits covering the bedrock (Northern Ireland Habitat Action Plan, 2005). The habitat typical starts with gravel beds in

coastal water deeper than 10m and continues towards boulder slopes and gravel plains inshore (Erwin, Picton, Connor, Howson, Gilleece, & Bogues, 1986). Extensive gravel shores are found in a number of areas around the Northern Ireland coast. They tend to occur in places where strong tidal currents or wave action prevent the deposition of finer material. Sand and Gravel shore can support a number of marine animal species such as polychete worms, isopods, and crabs (CVNI, 2011). These shorelines may have a fairly diverse flora occupation above the high water mark. Below the high tide mark, disturbance to the shingle and the salinity of the ground will prevent any growth of significant plant life. (National Museums Northern Ireland, 2010). The 2005 Habitat Action Plan for Northern Ireland’s sandy and gravel shores has set the following targets for the conservation of the habitat Maintain the extent of a representative range of sub‐littoral sands and gravel habitats and associated communities in Northern Ireland Maintain the condition of a representative range of sub‐littoral sands and gravel habitats and associated communities in Northern Ireland

Figure 1 ‐ Dundrum Bay, Down

103

103

Seagrass Beds Seagrasses are a type of submerged aquatic vegetation that have evolved from terrestrial plants and have become specialized to live in the marine environment. Seagrass beds develop in shallow, sheltered tidal sediments and in Northern Ireland are confined to sea loughs (Northern Ireland Habitat Action Plan, 2003), such as Strangford Lough, Lough Foyle and Belfast Lough (CVNI, 2011). Seagrasses are a unique group of plant species, they are the flowering plants that are fully

adapted to a marine environment, there are approximately 60 species of seagrass existing today (Den Hartog, 1970). Five seagrass species are found in Northern Ireland; three species of eelgrass and two species of tassel weed (Northern Ireland Habitat Action Plan, 2003). Seagrass beds are considered to be highly productive habitat as they support a wide variety of flora and fauna in addition to acting as a nursery for a many fish species. Seagrass beds can support an extensive volume of different animals, one hectare of seagrass may support up to 125 million small vertebrates and 10,000 fish (CVNI, 2011). Seagrass beds are an important food resource for wintering wildfowl. This tidal seagrass zones represent an important resource in the diet of many nationally important species, such as Mute Swans, Whooper Swans, Light‐bellied Brent Geese and Wigeon (Northern Ireland Habitat Action Plan, 2003). The 2003 Habitat Action Plan for Northern Ireland’s seagrass beds has set the following targets for the conservation of the habitat Maintain the extent of seagrass beds in Northern Ireland watersMaintain the quality of seagrass beds in Northern Ireland watersMaintain the distribution of seagrass beds in Northern Ireland watersWhere feasible, restore lost, damaged or degraded seagrass bedsThese targets are reliant on surveys to be undertaken to ascertain the extent, quality and distribution of seagrass beds in Northern Ireland

Figure 2 ‐ Eelgrass, North Strangford Lough

104

104

Mudflats Mudflats are intertidal habitats created by sedimentary deposition in low energy coastal environments, such as mud silt and clay. These habitats are particularly found in estuaries and other sheltered areas such as sea loughs (Northern Ireland Habitat Action Plan, 2003). Typically mudflats can cover a large area, often being several kilometres in width and often being located between the low tide water mark and vegetated saltmarshes. Mudflats play an important role in protecting saltmarshes as they absorbing wave energy (CVNI, 2011).

Mudflats are characterised as areas of high biological productivity and are capable of supporting a large volume of organisms. However this wealth of fauna is marked low species diversity with few rare species, particularly amongst microorganisms and lower food chain animals (Northern Ireland Habitat Action Plan, 2003). While mudflats may appear to be deficient in plant cover, they do possess extensive mats of microalgae which support numerous species (Northern Ireland Habitat Action Plan, 2003). And where the shore is made up of mud or fine silt, certain flowering plants adapted to growth in saline conditions can thrive between low and high water marks (National Museums Northern Ireland, 2010). Mudflats in combination with other tidal habitats are of great national importance to large numbers of bird and fish species. These environments are crucial feeding, resting and breeding grounds for internationally important populations of waterfowl. The mudflats at Strangford Lough support over 70,000 birds annually, making it the most important sea lough in Northern Ireland for waterfowl (Northern Ireland Habitat Action Plan, 2003). The 2003 Habitat Action Plan for Northern Ireland’s mudflats has set the following targets for the conservation of the habitat Maintain the extent of mudflats and associated plant and animal communities in Northern Ireland Maintain the condition of mudflats and associated plant and animal communities in Northern IrelandWhere appropriate, enhance the extent and condition of mudflats in Northern Ireland

Figure 3 ‐ Millbay, Antrim

105

105

Saltmarshes Saltmarshes form when vegetation becomes established and thusly stabilises sheltered tidal mudflats, they typically occupy the areas between spring and neap tide on adjoining mudflats. Saltmarshes consist of a series of island of low‐growing plants separated by narrow channels (Northern Ireland Habitat Action Plan, 2005). They can be found at estuaries, saline lagoons or behind barrier islands. Saltmarsh is a rare habitat in Northern Ireland;

this may be due to smaller tidal ranges than the UK and Republic of Ireland. As a result there are fewer potential areas for saltmarshes to establish themselves, saltmarsh in Northern Ireland comprise only 0.5% of the total UK habitat area (Northern Ireland Habitat Action Plan, 2005) or 250ha (Northern Ireland Habitat Action Plan, 2005). The largest areas of saltmarsh in Northern Ireland are the Roe Estuary in Lough Foyle, around Strangford Lough, at Ballycarry in Larne Lough, the Bann Estuary and Mill Bay in Carlingford Lough. These five sites account for 90% of the saltmarsh area of Northern Ireland (Northern Ireland Habitat Action Plan, 2005). Saltmarshes provided for a range of organisms, in particular specialist plant communities and their associated animals. They provide a valuable resource for wading birds and wildfowl as they act as high tide refuges for birds feeding on adjacent mudflats. They also provide breeding sites for waders, gulls and terns, and are a source of food for passerine birds particularly in autumn and winter (Northern Ireland Habitat Action Plan, 2005). Northern Ireland is one of the most important regions in the UK for wintering wildfowl, due to its mild winter climate and abundance of wetland. Strangford Lough is considered to be Northern Ireland’s major coastal site for migrant and wintering waterfowl with 20,000 birds migrating there every year. It also supports 25 national important waterfowl species, three of which are international protected (Northern Ireland Habitat Action Plan, 2005). A number of specialist invertebrate species are associated with saltmarshes in Northern Ireland such as the Rove Beetle, a Priority Species (Northern Ireland Habitat Action Plan, 2005). The 2005 Habitat Action Plan for Northern Ireland’s saltmarshes has set the following targets for the conservation of the habitat Maintain the current extent of saltmarsh at 250haMaintain the area of saltmarsh in favourable condition at 135haBy 2015, restore to favourable condition an area of saltmarsh in unfavourable condition (100ha.)

Figure 4 ‐ Ballymacormick Point, Bangor

106

106

Saline Lagoon Saline lagoons are bodies of seawater that have become disconnected from the sea. The environment of these lagoons where is neither marine nor freshwater but may vary from brackish to fully or hyper‐saline (Northern Ireland Habitat Action Plan, 2005). Saline lagoons can be both naturally of artificially constructed. Natural lagoons occur when a barrier such as a sand or shingle bar separated a lagoon from the sea. Artificial lagoons are frequently created when engineering works cut

off part of an estuary or bay from direct tidal influences (Northern Ireland Habitat Action Plan, 2005). Although small brackish pools are frequent around the coast in saltmarshes, larger bodies of brackish water are rare. There are only 30 reported saline lagoons in Northern Ireland (Bamber, Gilliland, & Shardlow, 2001). Strand Lough in Down, is an example of a large body of semi‐saline water (CVNI, 2011). The variations in the salinity of individual lagoons entails distinctiveness in local their flora and fauna. Each pool represents a limited opportunity for vegetation and animals, and often has to be highly specialised to cope with the environmental conditions (National Museums Northern Ireland, 2010). Thus the presence of such a degree of specialist flora or fauna makes the conservation of saline lagoons important in maintaining biodiversity (Northern Ireland Habitat Action Plan, 2005). Saline lagoons are often an important habitat for large numbers of wildfowl and waders, provide important locations for high tide roosts and offer habitats for migrating birds (Northern Ireland Habitat Action Plan, 2005). The habitat is also favoured by a number specialised marine species but flora and fauna. The lagoon cockle, (a filter feeding bivalve), that is often found submerged in the soft sediments of the lagoon (Northern Ireland Habitat Action Plan, 2005). And for plant life, a mixture of freshwater and marine plant life occupies saline lagoons. The fringe vegetation of these bodies of water are similar to freshwater ponds and lakes, with additional marine species such as ‘beds’ of Tassel Weeds and the seagrass Spiral Tassel Weeds, both of which are protected by separate habitat action plans (CVNI, 2011). The 2005 Habitat Action Plan for Northern Ireland’s saline lagoon has set the following targets for the conservation of the habitat Maintain the extent of saline lagoons and associated plant and animal communities in Northern Ireland Maintain the condition of saline lagoons and associated plant and animal communities in Northern Ireland Create lagoon habitat to offset losses. (Although it is not clear how much of this habitat has been lost, it is apparent that there has been a loss. An interim target of 2ha by 2010 has been set, initially based on the requirement of UK habitat action plan)

Figure 5 ‐ Strand Lough, Down

107

107

Sand Dunes Sand dunes occur when a beach is large enough or has the significant tidal power to allow sand to dry out complete between high tide points. The dry sand is then blown landwards by the wind, where it accumulates into dunes. Dunes are then stabilised by plant life which grows through the hardened sand (CVNI, 2011). The largest dune systems are located along the north and south‐east coasts, namely in north Antrim and South Down. (Northern Ireland Habitat Action Plan, 2005)

Little to no new dunes are currently forming around Northern Ireland at present, the formation of sand dunes is not continuous and existing coastal dunes were formed thousands of years ago (Northern Ireland Habitat Action Plan, 2005). The area between Lough Foyle and the Bann Estuary has some of the oldest recorded dunes in Ireland, at over 5000 years. Dune habitats are typically nutrient poor and have deficiencies in there supply of fresh water; however this has created a high diversity of specialised plants and fauna specials. Murlough Dunes at Dundrum, Co. Down supports 55 species of bee, ant and wasp (which equates to 33% of Irish fauna), 213 species of moth (48% of Northern Irish fauna) and 21 species of butterfly, roughly 71% of Northern Irish butterfly fauna (Northern Ireland Habitat Action Plan, 2005). The EHS estimated there is approximately 3000ha of sand dunes in Northern Ireland; however the area of vegetated sand dunes is estimated to be somewhere between 1300ha and 1500ha (Northern Ireland Habitat Action Plan, 2005). The 2005 Habitat Action Plan for Northern Ireland’s sand dunes has set the following targets for the conservation of the habitat Maintain the current extent of sand dunes at 1500haMaintain the area of sand dunes in favourable condition at 300haBy 2015, restore to favourable condition an area of sand dune in unfavourable condition (1150ha.)

Figure 6 ‐ Murlough Sand Dunes at Dundrum Bay

108

108

Vegetated Shingles Banks Vegetable shingle banks occupy the landward side on coastal shores when local conditions suit there formation. Shingle banks are typically long strips that cover a small total area and while they occur throughout the costal, there is a concentration on the northeast shoreline, namely the Mournes Coast and Rathlin Island (National Museums Northern Ireland, 2010). An estimated 50ha of vegetated shingle occurs in Northern Ireland (Northern Ireland Habitat Action Plan, 2005). Of this, approximately 30ha

are considered stable. These areas support a range of plant communities, including scrub and grassland, often rich in lichens. It is these areas of stable shingle that are the main focus of this habitat action plan. Currently 48ha of vegetated shingle habitat are protected by Areas of Special Scientific Interest (ASSI) notification in Northern Ireland. Shingle banks are naturally broken up by sea action and are subject to occasional disturbance by storms. This disturbance prevents most land plants from effectively colonising them (NIEA, 2010). However above the high water mark a fairly diverse flora exists. Below high water mark tidal disturbance of the shingle and the salinity prevents any growth of vascular plants. Shingle banks are partially important for several species that are scarce in Northern Ireland, such as oyster plant and sea cabbage (National Museums Northern Ireland, 2010). The 2005 Habitat Action Plan for Northern Ireland’s vegetable shingle banks has set the following targets for the conservation of the habitat Maintain the current extent of coastal vegetated shingle at 50haMaintain the area of coastal vegetated shingle in favourable condition at 25haBy 2015, restore to favourable condition as much as is practical, of the remainder of the resource i.e. 25ha

Figure 7 ‐ Kearney, Down

109

109

Cliffs and Slopes It is estimated that the length of Northern Ireland’s coastline is 650km (Northern Ireland Habitat Action Plan, 2005), with 500km of this comprising of coastal cliffs and slopes. The Northern Ireland Countryside Survey 2000, give an approximation of the total area of the habitat to be 528 hectares (Cooper, McCann, & Rogers, 2009). The vegetation on cliffs can vary vastly over short distances; this is due the soil composition and local geography (Northern Ireland Habitat

Action Plan, 2005). Northern Ireland’s cliffs are an important habitat for breeding seabirds which can reach numbers of international importance. There are seabird colonies on many stretches of the Down and Antrim coasts. There is a wide range of coastal breeding birds associated with cliff habitats; these include the priority species such as the Chough and Twite. The cliffs on Rathlin Island provide nesting sites for nationally important colonies of Guillemot and Kittiwake and the internationally important Razorbill (CVNI, 2011). Maritime cliff habitats have been in decline during the past century for much of Britain and Ireland (CVNI, 2011). However in Northern Ireland, no significant losses have been recorded between 1991‐1998 (Northern Ireland Habitat Action Plan, 2005), in fact the flora of sea cliffs is one of the few habitats largely undamaged by modern human activities (National Museums Northern Ireland, 2010). The 2005 Habitat Action Plan for Northern Ireland’s maritime cliff and slope has set the following targets for the conservation of the habitat Maintain the current extent of all maritime cliff and slope at 500kmMaintain the area of maritime cliff and slope in favourable condition at 250kmBy 2015, restore to favourable condition 225km of maritime cliff and slope in unfavourable condition


110

110

Eutrophic Waters Eutrophic standing water describes a body of water with a high nutrient content (nitrogen and phosphate). Most of Northern Ireland’s larger lakes such as Lough Neagh and Lough Beg and Lough Erne are regarded as eutrophic (Northern Ireland Habitat Action Plan, 2005). The Environment and Heritage Service (EHS) states that the area of eutrophic standing water in Northern Ireland is approximately 940 km2. This is comprised mainly of the five largest lakes in Northern Ireland, which represent less than 0.3% of the total lake numbers but contribute 89% of

the total national water volume (Northern Ireland Habitat Action Plan, 2005). The high nutrient levels make these bodies of water are very productive and have a high biodiversity. Plankton and algae are plentiful and together with the submerged vegetation they support a large variety of species, during summer it is common for a dense population of algae to accumulated, making the water green (CVNI, 2011). Dragonflies, water beetles, stoneflies and mayflies are found in eutrophic standing water habitats. A number of fish and eel species are common and eutrophic water supports some of the few amphibians that reside in Northern Ireland for example frogs and newts (CVNI, 2011). The areas surrounding eutrophic water are important for bird species, non‐migratory species such as Whooper Swan, Tufted Duck, Cormorant and Graylag Geese, in addition to migratory wader and wildfowl species all rely of these habitats for feeding and breeding (CVNI, 2011). The 2005 Habitat Action Plan for Northern Ireland’s eutrophic standing water has set the following targets for the conservation of the habitat Restore to Good Ecological Status all eutrophic standing waters by 2015, in line with the WFD

Figure 9 ‐ Eutrophic Water, Upper Lough Erne

111

111

Mesotrophic Lakes Mesotrophic and eutrophic lakes support an overlapping body of flora and fauna species. This is due to their similar chemical makeup (Northern Ireland Habitat Action Plan, 2005); eutrophic denotes a high level of nitrogen and phosphate, with mesotrophic showing a moderate level and finally oligotrophic lakes, which contain low levels of nutrients (NIEA, 2010). According to the UK Habitat Action Plan mesotrophic lakes are relatively infrequent; however Northern Ireland contains a high

proportion of the total UK resource. Mesotrophic lakes are generally represented by small body of water, the two largest mesotrophic lake sites in Northern Ireland are Lough Melvin (2100 ha) and Upper Lough Macnean, however the majority (72%) of Northern Ireland lakes have a surface area of less than 2ha (Northern Ireland Habitat Action Plan, 2005). Mesotrophic lakes supports a higher diversity of submerged aquatic plants than any other type of standing water, countered by the characteristically clear waters of mesotrophic lakes giving rise to low levels of growth in planktonic and filamentous algae (Northern Ireland Habitat Action Plan, 2005). This habitat type contains a variety of fish species, generally a mix of coarse and salmon species, but it is typical for several fish species to have been introduced and become established as part of the biodiversity associated with these lakes (CVNI, 2011). Lough Melvin is the only recorded site to support the Arctic Char in Northern Ireland in addition to three distinct races of brown trout and the Atlantic salmon (CVNI, 2011). It is important to note that mesotrophic lakes contain a high proportion of nationally rare aquatic plants, like the white water‐lily, the yellow water‐lily and several pondweeds species (CVNI, 2011). Other species supported by mesotrophic lakes include important groups of dragonflies, water beetles, stoneflies and mayflies, otters, Whiteclawed Crayfish, Globeflower, and Chaffweed. The 2005 Habitat Action Plan for Northern Ireland’s mesotrophic lakes has set the following targets for the conservation of the habitat Restore to Good Ecological Status all mesotrophic lakes by 2015, in line with the WFD

Figure 10 ‐Tower Lake, Newtownstewart, Omagh

112

112

Marl Lakes Marl lakes are natural lakes which occur at low altitude (over 60% of Northern Ireland’s lakes occur at altitudes of less than 100m); they differ from other lakes by highly alkaline water (Northern Ireland Habitat Action Plan, 2005). These lakes typical lie in drumlin basins receiving water as run‐off from the drumlin slopes; thusly the majority of marl lakes in Northern Ireland are mainly concentration in south east Fermanagh. Northern Ireland marl lakes are relatively small, averaging about 2.5 ha in the marl lake; the largest is Lough Inver in Fermanagh at 13ha (Northern Ireland Habitat Action Plan, 2005).

Marl lake water bodies are characterised by very clear water but has a low nutrient status. The high clarity of water creates excellent condition for aquatic plants, but the base‐rich chemistry of the water presents few nutrients to support phytoplankton and other fauna (Northern Ireland Habitat Action Plan, 2005). Marl lakes sustain a similar range of flora and fauna as other lake types, with macro invertebrates being well represented, particularly groups like dragonflies, water beetles, stoneflies and mayflies (Northern Ireland Habitat Action Plan, 2005). Some inter‐drumlin marl lakes are regionally important for the diversity of their pondweeds including rare species like the fen pondweed (CVNI, 2011). The 2005 Habitat Action Plan for Northern Ireland’s marl lakes has set the following targets for the conservation of the habitat Restore to Good Ecological Status all marl lakes by 2015, in line with the WFD

Figure 11 ‐ Knockballymore Lough, Fermanagh

113

113

Reed Beds Reed beds describe wetland habitats that are dominated by the Common Reed and other tall flowering plants which are adapted to growing in wet conditions. There are two forms of reed beds; reed swamps which are permanently waterlogged and reed fen where the water level is below the ground surface in summer and are more botanically diversity (CVNI, 2011). Reed beds are widely distributed along the margins of water bodies, streams, river and other forms of wetlands and bogs. In Northern

Ireland, they are especially associated with lowland areas around the large lakes and drumlin wetlands. Several large (over 10ha) reed beds occupy the catchment areas of Lough Neagh and Lough Erne, in addition to an estimated 40 sites, greater than 2ha, in Down and Armagh (Northern Ireland Habitat Action Plan, 2005). UK wide, there has been a considerable loss in reed bed habitats, with a reduction in area of 40% between 1945 and 1990 (Hawke & José, 1996). It is believed that the habitat has diminished by a similar amount during the same period in Northern Ireland, the 2000 Northern Ireland Countryside Survey reported that the habitat range has remained stable between 1988 to 1998 (Cooper, McCann, & Meharg, 2002).

Reed beds in Northern Ireland are generally unmanaged with their coverage limited by water‐levels and nutrient supply. The habitat is defined as being a vegetation species‐poor environment, but support a rich array of fauna adapted to wetlands, notably breeding birds (Northern Ireland Habitat Action Plan, 2005). A wide range of wetland fauna benefits from the resources provided by reed beds, especially where they are located near to fens or open water. UK wide reports state that at least 700 species of invertebrates can be associated with reed beds; with 64 insect species partially dependent on reed and some 40 species of insect feed solely on reed (Northern Ireland Habitat Action Plan, 2005). A rapidly growing level of research and installation of reed beds is accruing as they are a natural filtration system for waste water. Currently there are a number of schemes looking at reed bed technology for a variety of purposes aimed at sewage and waste water treatment, industrial effluent, and agricultural run‐off (CVNI, 2011). The 2005 Habitat Action Plan for Northern Ireland’s reed beds has set the following targets for the conservation of the habitat Maintain the total extent of reed bed in Northern Ireland at 3,200haWhere favourable, maintain the condition of reed bed in Northern IrelandAchieve favourable condition of 95% of reed bed which lies within designated sites, by 2015 For stands outside ASSIs, secure favourable condition over, as near as practicable, 100% of the reed bed resource in Northern Ireland, by 2015


114

114

Floodplain Grazing Marsh Grazing marshes are divided into two main categories; coastal and floodplain grazing marches. Coastal grazing marshes occur in flat coastal areas frequently behind natural barriers, typically sand dunes, and coastal defences (often resulting from reclaimed saltmarsh or mudflats). Floodplain grazing marshes are connected to large slow‐moving rivers and lakes. Much of these habitats were formerly wet woodlands, fens or reed beds repurposed for agricultural use (Northern Ireland Habitat Action Plan, 2005).

Grazing marshes are commonly residual habitats resulting from redundant agricultural practices that were more widespread in the past, with the hallmark features of this habitat type relying on some form of maintenance (Cooper, McCann, & Rogers, 2009). Inland floodplain grazing marshes are more widespread in Northern Ireland than the rest of the UK. The habitat characteristically occurs in flat low‐lying areas in combination with other wetland habitats, for instance lakes and fens. Based on the Northern Ireland Countryside Survey 2000, the area of species‐rich wet grassland in Northern Ireland is believed to cover 1.0% of the country, estimated to be 13,808ha (Cooper, McCann, & Rogers, 2009). Although much of Northern Ireland’s grazing marshes are inclined to be somewhat poor in the diversity of vegetation species, several notable flora species which have a restricted habitat range in Ireland do reside in grazing marshes. Notable species are the Whorled Caraway, Tubular Water‐Dropwort, Water Violet and Flowering Rush, Marsh Pea, and Irish Lady’s‐Tresses Orchid (Northern Ireland Habitat Action Plan, 2005). The environment also provides resources for an array of important breeding and wintering waterfowl such as snipe, lapwing, redshank and curlew. Additionally the pools and ditches within the habitat are commonly rich with freshwater invertebrates and plants species (Northern Ireland Habitat Action Plan, 2005). Because of its importance to breeding waterfowl, the habitat has been the subject to numerous surveys over the past few decades. These species have exhibited al long running population decline(Donaghy & Mellon, 1999), in line with a rapid area decline of 28% in grazing marshes between 1991 and 1998, due to drainage schemes and related agricultural improvement (Cooper, McCann, & Rogers, 2009). The 2005 Habitat Action Plan for Northern Ireland’s coastal and floodplain grazing marshes has set the following targets for the conservation of the habitat Maintain the total extent of coastal and floodplain grazing marsh in Northern Ireland Where favourable, maintain the condition of coastal and floodplain grazing marsh in Northern IrelandAchieve favourable condition of 95% of coastal and floodplain grazing marsh which lies within designated sites, by 2015 For stands outside ASSIs, secure favourable condition over, as near as practicable, 100% of the coastal and floodplain grazing marsh resource in Northern Ireland by 2015 Restore 50ha of coastal and floodplain grazing marsh by 2015Restore a further 50ha of coastal and floodplain grazing marsh by 2020


115

115

Wet Woodlands Wet woodlands describe an assortment of woodland and scrub forms that occupy on waterlogged or seasonally flooded land. The timber species that inhabitant wet woodlands is quite diverse, usually being dominated by Willow, Alder or Downy Birch, but also includes Ash or Oak on the drier margins of the habitat (Northern Ireland Habitat Action Plan, 2005). Willow scrub woodlands are the most extensive wet woodland community in Northern Ireland, they often occur as an initiate woodland colony

prior to the development of a more mature habitat (Northern Ireland Habitat Action Plan, 2005). Wet woodlands are not limited to one soil condition and are capable of developing on nutrient‐rich mineral, acid soils and nutrient‐poor peat soils. The common factor in there development is that they typical occupy the fringes of a primary water, a lake or bog for example and frequently occur in conjunction with other woodland habitats (Northern Ireland Habitat Action Plan, 2005). The precise extent of wet woodland in the UK is unclear, but it is estimated to be between 50,000 ‐ 70,000ha (JNCC, 2001). Unfortunately with the extensive historic forest clearance in Northern Ireland has resulted in the current national wet woodland resource being of relatively recent origin (typically less than 100 years old). Wet woodlands are currently a scattered habitat, inclined to be small than 3‐5 ha in size (Northern Ireland Habitat Action Plan, 2005). Recent estimates place the extent of wet woodlands in Northern Ireland to occupy an area of 2,600ha. Positively the NICS 2000 has indicated a 9% range increase in the wet woodlands and shrubs between 1988 and 1998 (Cooper, McCann, & Rogers, 2009). Generally wet woodlands are unmanaged and are often used for grazing and shelter by livestock. Nevertheless the habitat is noted as an excellent resource for insects and other invertebrates, like snails and spiders. Furthermore these wet environments support a very large number of species, providing cover and breeding sites for otters and are of value for bats and a number of breeding birds many of which are now rare in Northern Ireland (CVNI, 2011). The 2005 Habitat Action Plan for Northern Ireland’s wet woodlands has set the following targets for the conservation of the habitat Maintain the area of all wet woodlands in Northern Ireland at least 2,600haMaintain the current area of all ancient or long‐established semi‐natural wet woodlands Maintain condition, where favourable, of the existing resourceAchieve favourable condition of 1650ha of wet woodland by 2015Restore 60ha of former wet woodland on ancient and long‐established woodland sites by 2010 Restore a further 70ha of former wet woodland on ancient and long‐established woodland sites by 2015 Establish 120ha of wet woodland by 2010Establish a further 140ha of wet woodland by 2015

Figure 14 ‐ Bonds Glen, Derry

116

116

Mixed Ashwood The categorisation of mixed ashwoods is applied to an expansive range of forests located on base‐rich soils, in the case of Northern Ireland this is the basalts region of County Antrim and the limestone basins in County Fermanagh, with more periodical sites in the Sperrins and County Down and Armagh (Northern Ireland Habitat Action Plan, 2005). Ash is generally the dominant species, although locally oak, downy birch and even hazel may be the most abundant species (Northern Ireland

Habitat Action Plan, 2005). Ashwood ground flora is particularly rich and varied because of fertility nature of the soils and a forest canopy which doesn’t cast dense shade, such as Wood Anemone, Bluebell, Primrose and Ramsons (wild garlic) (CVNI, 2011). In general, mixed ashwoods are unmanaged in Northern Ireland often being utilised for grazing and shelter by livestock (Northern Ireland Habitat Action Plan, 2005). It is estimated that the total area of ashwoods in the UK is 67,500ha, however this is only an estimate as there is no precise data (JNCC, 2001). Similarly the estimated area of mixed ashwoods in Northern Ireland is a minimal 3,430ha, with 3,300ha in private ownership and 130ha in public ownership (Northern Ireland Habitat Action Plan, 2005). The NICS 2000 survey present positive information on the extent of ashwoods, with a 9% increase between 1988 and 1998 (Cooper, McCann, & Rogers, 2009). The 2005 Habitat Action Plan for Northern Ireland’s mixed ashwoods has set the following targets for the conservation of the habitat Maintain the total area of all mixed ashwoods in Northern Ireland at 3,430haMaintain the current area of all ancient or long‐established semi‐natural mixed ashwoods Maintain condition, where favourable, of the existing resourceAchieve favourable condition of 2000ha of mixed ashwoods by 2015Restore 80ha of former mixed ashwoods which has been converted to plantation on ancient or long‐established woodland sites by 2010 Restore a further 90ha of former mixed ashwoods which has been converted to plantation on ancient or long‐established woodland sites by 2015 Establish 160ha of mixed ashwoods by 2010Establish a further 180ha of mixed ashwoods by 2015

Figure 15 ‐ Glenarm Woodlands, Antrim

117

117

Figure 16 ‐ Breen Oakwood, Antrim

Oakwood Oak forests were once common across Europe and Ireland (CVNI, 2011).These forests are characterised populated by native oaks like Sessile Oak and Pedunculate Oak and Downy Birch, the habitat normally contains smaller tree species, tree species such as Holly, Rowan and Hazel are common within the forest canopy (Northern Ireland Habitat Action Plan, 2005). Northern Ireland’s oak woodlands are concentrated in the north east, on less base‐rich soils, in rocky and wet locations (CVNI, 2011).

Oak trees are an important commodity for the forest dwelling flora and fauna. A individual oak tree is recorded at be capable of supporting over 350 different species of insect, (much more than any other tree) as well as an abundance of lower plants such as fungi, ferns, mosses and lichens (CVNI, 2011). The range of plants living at ground level in oak woods varies according to the underlying soil type and degree of grazing; but Bluebell, Bramble and fern communities, through to grass, Bracken and moss dominated areas are common (Northern Ireland Habitat Action Plan, 2005). Similar to other forest types, the exact are of oakwood forests in the UK is uncertain, but it is gauged at between 70,000 ‐ 100,000ha (JNCC, 2001). With the extrapolated Northern Ireland oak woods occupies an area of 2,350ha, with an approximate 2,000 ha in private ownership and 350 ha in public ownership (Northern Ireland Habitat Action Plan, 2005).The NICS 2000 has reported a 11% increase to the habitat range between 1988 and 1998 (Cooper, McCann, & Rogers, 2009). Oaks can live more than 500 years, with the production of acorns taking up to 80 years (CVNI, 2011). The 2005 Habitat Action Plan for Northern Ireland’s oak woods has set the following targets for the conservation of the habitat Maintain the total area of all oak woods in Northern Ireland at 2,350haMaintain the current area of all ancient or long‐established semi‐natural oak woods Maintain condition, where favourable, of the existing resourceAchieve favourable condition of 1600ha of oak woods by 2015Restore 60ha of former oakwood which has been converted to non‐native plantation on ancient and long‐established woodland sites by 2010 Restore a further 60ha of former oakwood which has been converted to non‐native plantation on ancient and long‐established woodland sites by 2015 Establish 120ha of oakwood by 2010 Establish a further 120ha of oakwood by 2015

118

118

Figure 17 ‐ Wangford Warren, Suffolk

Lowland Dry Acid Grasslands Lowland dry acid grassland habitats generally occur on nutrient‐poor, free‐draining soils which are based on acid rocks or shallow deposits of sands and gravels (NIEA, 2010). When acid grasslands are located in highland locations they are often a species poor product of former heathland. However when correctly managed, lowland dry acid grasslands are generally species rich, with a wide range of grasses, herbs, dwarf shrubs, lichens and mosses (Northern Ireland Habitat Action Plan, 2005).

The most characteristic herb and grass species are Heath Bedstraw, Sheep’s Sorrel, Sheep’s Fescue, Common Bent, Pill Sedge and Tormentil. Dwarf shrubs, such as Heather and Bilberry can also be present, as are brightly coloured and unusual fungi, like the Wax‐Cap, Fairy‐Clubs and Earth‐Tongues (NIEA, 2010). Lowland dry acid grasslands are rare in Ireland and the UK, with the total area of the habitat in Northern Ireland only estimated at 674ha with only small concentrations in Co. Down and Armagh. The territory of these grasslands is highly scattered, with examples tending to be small occupying on rocky knolls or as part of other more dominant grasslands (Northern Ireland Habitat Action Plan, 2005). Individual instances would seldom have an area exceeding 0.25ha (Corbett, 2003). The habitat also occurs as lawns associated with old gardens, church yards and other amenity areas where regular cutting and absence of nutrient inputs has resulted in very leached and as a result, relatively acid soils (Northern Ireland Habitat Action Plan, 2005). The habitat range has undergone substantial decline over much of the Britain and Ireland over the past century. The decline has been mostly due to agricultural intensification and forestation (Northern Ireland Habitat Action Plan, 2005). Approximately 7% of species‐rich dry grassland were lost to development projects in Northern Ireland between 1991 and 1998 (Cooper, McCann, & Rogers, 2009), although it is not clear how much of this, if any, was lowland dry acid grassland. The 2005 Habitat Action Plan for Northern Ireland’s lowland dry acid grasslands has set the following targets for the conservation of the habitat Maintain the total extent of lowland dry acid grassland in Northern Ireland at 674ha Maintain condition, where favourable, of the existing resourceAchieve favourable condition of all significant stands of lowland dry acid grassland within ASSIs by 2010 For stands outside ASSIs, achieve favourable condition over 75% of the resource by 2015 Re‐establish 5ha of lowland dry acid grassland at carefully targeted sites by 2010

119

119

Calcareous Grasslands Calcareous grasslands are species‐rich grassland occurring on shallow, lime ‐rich soils the majority of which derive from chalk and limestone rocks (Northern Ireland Habitat Action Plan, 2005). These habitats were originally created when woodland was cleared and rely on grazing or other management to prevent shrubs from re‐colonising the region (NIEA, 2010). All calcareous grassland in Northern Ireland occur in highland location, where as lowland calcareous grasslands occur in the rest of the UK.

The majority of calcareous grassland occurs in the limestone uplands of County Fermanagh, with most examples occur above 150m altitude with only small pockets o f the habitat found at lower elevations (Northern Ireland Habitat Action Plan, 2005). Calcareous grasslands are a significant habitat for several species, particularly butterflies. Numerous Northern Ireland priority species reside in these environments, namely Irish Hare, Skylark, the ‘Small Blue’ Butterfly, Dingy Skipper Butterfly, Irish Eyebright, Dense Flowered Orchid, the Hoverfly and a selection of mosses. Of these species, Irish Eyebright, Dense Flowered Orchid and Autumn Gentian are found nowhere else in the UK. Calcareous grasslands in Northern Ireland typically occur as components of larger habitat ranges, which are generally managed as rough grazing land for domestic livestock. (CVNI, 2011) This results in the habitat being fragmented in areas such as Antrim. The NICS 2000 places an approximate value of 936ha for the extent of the habitat type (Northern Ireland Habitat Action Plan, 2005). Like many other important habitats, calcareous grasslands has undergone significant decline in recent years, but there is very little data available to tell us exactly how much. This decline can be mainly attributed to scrub invasion or changes in management to more intensive practices (CVNI, 2011). The 2005 Habitat Action Plan for Northern Ireland’s calcareous grasslands has set the following targets for the conservation of the habitat Maintain the total extent of calcareous grassland in Northern Ireland at 936 haMaintain condition, where favourable, of the existing resourceAchieve favourable condition of all significant stands of calcareous grassland within ASSIs and SACs by 2010 For stands outside ASSIs, achieve favourable condition over 75% of the resource by 2015 Re‐establish 10 ha of calcareous grassland at carefully targeted sites by 2010

Figure 18 ‐ Little Deer Park, Antrim

120

120

Lowland Meadows Lowland meadows are areas of agricultural unimproved grassland which contains few high plant species, like trees and a minimal coverage by bushes (Northern Ireland Habitat Action Plan, 2005). The soil layers of these habitats are generally composed of well‐drained mineral soil, with the habitat characteristically supporting a rich variety of herb species. There are no significant concentrations of lowland meadow in Northern Ireland, but often

reside on relatively steep hill slopes. The habitat is typically fragmented and is often restricted to small parts of fields where agricultural operations are difficult (Northern Ireland Habitat Action Plan, 2005). A noteworthy number of lowland meadow sites in Northern Ireland survives as hay meadow and are a result of the traditional agricultural practices for hay production (CVNI, 2011). There is a wealth of low lying vegetation inhabitant lowland meadows, concentration around herbs and fine‐leaved grasses. herb species such as Meadow Vetchling, Common Knapweed and different types of fine‐leaved grasses like the Common Bent, Red Fescue and a variety of scarce and declining plants such as the Butterfly‐Orchid (Northern Ireland Habitat Action Plan, 2005). Important fauna, both vertebrates and invertebrates species, rely upon lowland meadows for example Skylarks, Corncrake and the Irish Hare, all of which are Northern Ireland priority species (CVNI, 2011). In the UK the area of lowland meadows of conservation value has declined by 95% since the 1930 (Northern Ireland Habitat Action Plan, 2005). Areas of traditional species‐rich hay meadows in Northern Ireland may have declined by as much as 97% over the last 50 years, with the area covered decreased by 20% since 1991. Only a minority (13%) of lowland meadows are considered to be of a high ecological quality, which relates into an area estimate of 937ha of high quality habitat in Northern Ireland (Northern Ireland Habitat Action Plan, 2005). The 2005 Habitat Action Plan for Northern Ireland’s lowland meadows has set the following targets for the conservation of the habitat Maintain the area of lowland meadow in Northern Ireland at 937haMaintain condition, where favourable, of the existing resourceAchieve favourable status of all significant stands of lowland meadow within ASSIs by 2010 For stands outside ASSIs, achieve favourable condition over 75% of the resource by 2015 Re‐establish 10ha of lowland meadow at carefully targeted sites by 2010

Figure 19 ‐ Tees Valley, Middlesbrough

121

121

Purple Moor‐grass & Rush Pastures Purple moor‐grass and rush pastures are habitat types that occur on poorly drained, usually acidic soils in lowland areas of high rainfall in Western Europe (Northern Ireland Habitat Action Plan, 2005). Northern Ireland contains a large portion of the European resource and is estimated to contain a third (18,700ha) of the total UK area. This habitat comprises approximately 1.2% of the total land area of Northern Ireland, with over half of this sum occurring within the Fermanagh district (CVNI, 2011).

Examples of more‐grass and rush pastures in Northern Ireland are difficult to define as it encompass a wide range of species, determined locally by an assortment of factors including soil condition, aspect and management practices (Northern Ireland Habitat Action Plan, 2005). However, they play an important role in providing areas where different priority species can live, feed and breed; this includes birds such as the Skylark, Curlew, and the Reed Bunting. These territories provide for a series of UK priority flora (Blue‐Eyed Grass and the Irish Lady’s‐Tresses Orchid) and fauna species such as the Irish Hare, Marsh Fritillary Butterfly and the Common Ground Beetle (CVNI, 2011). The 2005 Habitat Action Plan for Northern Ireland’s purple moor‐grass and rush pastures has set the following targets for the conservation of the habitat Maintain the total extent of purple moor‐grass and rush pastures in Northern Ireland at 18,919ha Maintain condition, where favourable, of the existing resourceAchieve favourable condition of all significant stands of purple moor‐grass and rush pastures within ASSIs and SACs by 2010 For stands outside ASSIs, achieve favourable condition over 75% of the resource by 2015

Figure 20 ‐ Slievenacloy, Belfast Hills

122

122

Limestone Pavements In the UK there is less than 3,000 hectares of this rare landscape and in Northern Ireland limestone pavement is restricted to west Fermanagh. Where, limestone pavement occurs within 8 main localities the largest of which are Crossmurrin, Western Marlbank (70‐100ha) and Noon’s Hole Knockmore (100ha) (Northern Ireland Habitat Action Plan, 2005). However larger areas of Limestone Pavement occur within Southern Ireland in areas such as the Burren in Galway and Clare (CVNI, 2011).

There are three broad types of limestone pavement described in the UK; open, wooded and scrubby, however, in Northern Ireland wooded limestone pavement is largely absent (Northern Ireland Habitat Action Plan, 2005). The limestone surface typically supports grass species and plants adapted to rocky habitats or have no vegetation cover, mosses and liverworts are often prominent in exposed areas (CVNI, 2011). The shelter proved by the limestone grikes often support taller plants more lime and calcium based woodlands and include herbs, occasional shrubs such as Hazel and ferns such as Brittle Bladder and Hart’s Tongue (CVNI, 2011). The lack of good soil, space for root growth as well as grazing pressure often means that any trees or shrubs that are present are often stunted or dwarfed (Northern Ireland Habitat Action Plan, 2005). The open pavement provides a habitat for upland grassland vertebrate species such as the Irish Hare and the Skylark (Northern Ireland Habitat Action Plan, 2005). Other fauna that occupy the open pavements areas are the Cuckoo, Wrens, Common Lizard and Stoats. Invertebrate species include a range of less common insects, moths and butterfly species (CVNI, 2011). The 2005 Habitat Action Plan for Northern Ireland’s limestone pavements has set the following targets for the conservation of the habitat Maintain the extent of limestone pavement in Northern Ireland at 220haWhere favourable, maintain the area of limestone pavement in favourable condition Achieve 200ha of limestone pavement in favourable condition by 2015Achieve 220ha of limestone pavement in favourable condition by 2020


123

123

Lowland Heaths Lowland Heaths are defined as heathland that are situated below the upper altitude limit of cost effective agricultural practices, this is generally below 300m. Thusly these environments supports a range of flora and fauna not found in upland heaths. Lowland heathland is characterised by the dominating presence of dwarf shrubs such as Heather and Bell Heather. These heaths exist in both dry and wet environmental conditions, with most heathlands being 25‐90% of wet heaths species

(Northern Ireland Habitat Action Plan, 2003).

High quality lowland heathlands are usually structurally diverse supporting plants such as the Cross‐leaved Heath and Purple Moor‐grass, and the Black Bog‐rush. Dwarf shrubs like heathers, Western Gorse and trees such as Scots Pine are common (CVNI, 2011). Lowland heathland is a very important habitat for invertebrates like the Keeled Skimmer Dragonfly and the water beetles and endangered species like Curlew, Irish Hare, Chough, Marsh Fritillary Butterfly and Skylark can also be spotted (CVNI, 2011). Lowland heathlands are an internationally rare and threatened habitat, and the total UK habitat range represents a significant proportion (58,000ha correspond to about 20%) of the global total area (Northern Ireland Habitat Action Plan, 2003). The Northern Ireland Countryside Survey has estimated that the area of lowland heathland in Northern Ireland is in the range of 5,000ha, with no habitat loss to dry and an 11% loss of wet lowland heaths between 1992 and 1998 (Cooper, McCann, & Rogers, 2009). Within Northern Ireland, lowland heathland is generally fragmented and restricted, largely confined to the lower slopes of the Mourne Mountains and the Ring of Gullion, Rathlin Island and narrow coastal strips in Down and Antrim. Small areas of lowland heaths are linked to a number of fens in Down and Armagh (NIEA, 2010). The 2003 Habitat Action Plan for Northern Ireland’s lowland heathlands has set the following targets for the conservation of the habitat Maintain the current extent and overall distribution of all existing lowland heathland (5,000ha) Achieve appropriate management on all lowland heathland within ASSIs so that it is in or approaching favourable condition by 2010 Improve by management, all existing lowland heathland currently in unfavourable condition Encourage the re‐establishment by 2010 of a further 130 ha of lowland heathland

Figure 22 ‐ Murlough National Nature Reserve

124

124

Upland Heaths Upland heaths reside in the heathland zones above the upper altitude marker of the majority of Northern Ireland’s farms and the country’s mountainous regions, typically between 300m and 600m. The habitat is based upon thin mineral or peat soil, usually with substrates layers less than 0.5m deep (NIEA, 2010). In Northern Ireland, blanket bog covers much of the shallow upland landscape, relegating heathland habitats to steeper slopes where the fall of land is too sharp or soil too deep for peat accumulation (Northern Ireland Habitat Action Plan, 2003).

Upland heaths dominated with same dwarf shrubs as their lowland counterparts with the addition of a number of blanket bog plant species, as the two habitats occupy similar ranges (NIEA, 2010). Fauna species are also shared by all habitats providing feeding grounds and shelter to the rare priority species; Argent and Sable Moths, Sword‐Grass Moths, Red Grouse, Curlew, Hen Harrier and the Irish Hare (NIEA, 2010). Upland heathland is particularly prevalent in the Antrim Hills, Sperrin Mountains, Mourne Mountains, Ring of Gullion and the scarp slopes of western Fermanagh, where some important heathland sites straddle the border with the Republic of Ireland (Northern Ireland Habitat Action Plan, 2003). No comprehensive assessment in the extent, distribution or condition of the upland heathlands in Northern Ireland exists, but its extent is estimated at 58,500ha (Cooper, McCann, & Rogers, 2009), with the total upland heathland resource in the UK between 2 and 3 million hectares (Northern Ireland Habitat Action Plan, 2003). Unfortunately there has been considerable upland heathland loss in recent times, an estimated 20% of wet heaths, and 28% of dry heath pastures have been lost in Northern Ireland between 1992 and 1998 (Cooper, McCann, & Rogers, 2009). The 2003 Habitat Action Plan for Northern Ireland’s upland heathlands has set the following targets for the conservation of the habitat Maintain the current extent and overall distribution of upland heathland which is currently in favourable condition Achieve appropriate management on all upland heathland within ASSIs so that it is in or approaching favourable condition by 2010 Improve by management at least 50% of upland heathland currently in unfavourable condition outside ASSIs by 2010 Seek to increase dwarf shrubs to at least 25% cover where they have been reduced or eliminated due to inappropriate management. A target of 2,000 ha is proposed for such restoration by 2010 Initiate management to re‐create 100 ha of upland heathland by 2010 where heathland has been lost due to agricultural improvement or afforestation, with a particular emphasis on reducing fragmentation of existing heathland Mountainous Heaths

Figure 23 ‐ Bloody Bridge near Newcastle

125

125

Northern Ireland is located at the southern extreme of the natural range for montane or alpine heath habitats. These heaths occur widely in the Highlands of Scotland at altitudes over 600m, above the natural tree line (NIEA, 2010). Over 90% of the total UK montane heaths (approximately 600,000 ha) occurring in Scotland (Northern Ireland Habitat Action Plan, 2003). The distribution of montane heaths is influenced heavily by local environmental factors (climate, altitude, aspect, slope and maritime influences),

and unlike Scotland where these habitats are largely undisturbed, the montane heaths in Northern Ireland are highly impacted by sheep grazing and hill walking, especially the Mourne Mountains (Northern Ireland Habitat Action Plan, 2003). The vegetation is influenced by a cold and wet climate, thin soils and steep rocky ground (NIEA, 2010). Due to the strong winds at high altitudes, shrubs can only grow 5‐10cm in height and several arctic species (Stiff Sedge, Dwarf Willow and a number of Clubmosses) which are adapted to harsh climatic occupy these heathlands (NIEA, 2010). In Northern Ireland, the flora of these areas is restricted to dwarf‐shrub heaths, moss heaths and montane grasses, however in Scotland where national latitude is more situated to montane heaths; there is a greater diversity in plant species (Northern Ireland Habitat Action Plan, 2003). Invertebrates adapted to cold environments reside in montane heaths such as beetles and especially of the Linnaeus beetle, which are rare in the rest of Europe (NIEA, 2010) The distribution of montane heathlands in Northern Ireland is limited to the highest summits of the Mourne Mountains, Dart Mountain and Sawel Mountain in the Sperrin Mountains and the summit of Cuilcagh Mountain in west Fermanagh (NIEA, 2010). The 2003 Habitat Action Plan for Northern Ireland’s mountainous heathlands has set the following targets for the conservation of the habitat Maintain the extent of all existing mountainous heathAchieve appropriate management on all mountainous habitats (150ha) so that it is in or approaching favourable condition by 2015 Encourage the restoration by 2010 of 25ha of degraded mountainous heath in the Mourne Mountains

Figure 24 ‐ Mourne Mountains

124

Upland Heaths Upland heaths reside in the heathland zones above the upper altitude marker of the majority of Northern Ireland’s farms and the country’s mountainous regions, typically between 300m and 600m. The habitat is based upon thin mineral or peat soil, usually with substrates layers less than 0.5m deep (NIEA, 2010). In Northern Ireland, blanket bog covers much of the shallow upland landscape, relegating heathland habitats to steeper slopes where the fall of land is too sharp or soil too deep for peat accumulation (Northern Ireland Habitat Action Plan, 2003).

Upland heaths dominated with same dwarf shrubs as their lowland counterparts with the addition of a number of blanket bog plant species, as the two habitats occupy similar ranges (NIEA, 2010). Fauna species are also shared by all habitats providing feeding grounds and shelter to the rare priority species; Argent and Sable Moths, Sword‐Grass Moths, Red Grouse, Curlew, Hen Harrier and the Irish Hare (NIEA, 2010). Upland heathland is particularly prevalent in the Antrim Hills, Sperrin Mountains, Mourne Mountains, Ring of Gullion and the scarp slopes of western Fermanagh, where some important heathland sites straddle the border with the Republic of Ireland (Northern Ireland Habitat Action Plan, 2003). No comprehensive assessment in the extent, distribution or condition of the upland heathlands in Northern Ireland exists, but its extent is estimated at 58,500ha (Cooper, McCann, & Rogers, 2009), with the total upland heathland resource in the UK between 2 and 3 million hectares (Northern Ireland Habitat Action Plan, 2003). Unfortunately there has been considerable upland heathland loss in recent times, an estimated 20% of wet heaths, and 28% of dry heath pastures have been lost in Northern Ireland between 1992 and 1998 (Cooper, McCann, & Rogers, 2009). The 2003 Habitat Action Plan for Northern Ireland’s upland heathlands has set the following targets for the conservation of the habitat Maintain the current extent and overall distribution of upland heathland which is currently in favourable condition Achieve appropriate management on all upland heathland within ASSIs so that it is in or approaching favourable condition by 2010 Improve by management at least 50% of upland heathland currently in unfavourable condition outside ASSIs by 2010 Seek to increase dwarf shrubs to at least 25% cover where they have been reduced or eliminated due to inappropriate management. A target of 2,000 ha is proposed for such restoration by 2010 Initiate management to re‐create 100 ha of upland heathland by 2010 where heathland has been lost due to agricultural improvement or afforestation, with a particular emphasis on reducing fragmentation of existing heathland Mountainous Heaths

Figure 23 ‐ Bloody Bridge near Newcastle

126

126

Lowland Raised Bog Lowland raised bogs are peat based ecosystems, which develop primarily in altitudes below 150m and as a formation feature are surrounded by mineral based soils. The climate of Northern Ireland, the Republic of Ireland and north‐western Britain possess ideal climate conditions for peat formation, due to high rainfall, cool summers and high atmospheric humidity (Northern Ireland Habitat Action Plan, 2003). The lowland landscape of Northern Ireland is principally comprised of drumlins and glacial

boulder clays, thus resulting in poorly drained soils along the major the national river basins. Because of the levels of continuously waterlogged soil in Northern Ireland, a regular occurrence exists of the anaerobic conditions that are necessary for the formation of peat. Thusly Northern Ireland contains a proportionally high quantity of lowland raised bogs (CVNI, 2011). Lowland raised bogs support a variety of specialist plants and national priority species. The most abundant vegetation that exists in raised bogs includes Sphagnum Bog Mosses and other plants adapted to waterlogged conditions, such as the Cotton Grasses, Great Sundew, Cranberry and Bog Rosemary (CVNI, 2011). A distinctive range of rare and localised animals which are supported by raised bogs include breeding waders, Skylark and a variety of invertebrates, such as the Large Heath Butterfly (CVNI, 2011). The area of lowland raised bog in the UK that has remained unaffected by human activities is remarkable small. An estimated 94 % of raised bogs in the UK have been spoilt by human activities (6,000ha out of 95,000ha), in Northern Ireland the figure is 2,000ha out of 25,000ha (Northern Ireland Habitat Action Plan, 2003). The 2003 Habitat Action Plan for Northern Ireland’s lowland raised bogs has set the following targets for the conservation of the habitat. Maintain the current extent and overall distribution of near natural intact lowland raised bog in Northern Ireland, estimated at 1,600ha Ensure that the condition of the current near natural intact lowland raised bog is maintained where favourable. Improve the condition of those areas that are unfavourable through the establishment of appropriate management regimes and hydrological conditions Establish where practicable, appropriate hydrological and management regimes for intact areas which are in a degraded state (< 10 % Sphagnum Cover), but still retain nature conservation interest (c400ha). By 2015, aim to achieve management conditions that are conducive to the restoration of degraded intact lowland raised bog towards favourable condition By 2005, identify areas, timescales and targets for the conservation, improvement or restoration of significantly altered lowland raised bog, including those areas formerly cutover for fuel, improved for agriculture or planted with trees By 2006, initiate restoration projects for priority sites according to the agreed timescales

Figure 25 ‐ Fairy Water Bogs, Tyrone

127

127

Blanket Bog Blanket bogs are a restricted and endangered peatland habitat of global importance. Blanket bogs form in cool, wet, oceanic climate and currently are one of the most extensive habitats in the UK and Ireland. The blanket bog region in Ireland, represent 8% of the world’s total habitat area (CVNI, 2011). Blanket bog peat accumulates in response to the very slow rate at which plant material decomposes under waterlogged conditions, with an ability to cover an entire landscape, even

developing on slopes of up to 300m. Although most widespread in the wetter west and north regions of Northern Ireland, it also occurs in the Mourne Mountains (Northern Ireland Habitat Action Plan, 2003). The most extensive regions of blanket bog are inclined to occur at altitudes in excess of 200m and thusly are concentrated in the Antrim Plateau, the Sperrin Mountains and the Fermanagh drumlins (Northern Ireland Habitat Action Plan, 2003). These bogs are capable of supporting a wide range of animals, insects and birds. Invertebrates that are common to boglands include mayfly and stonefly larvae as well as dragonfly and damselfly larvae. Whirligig beetles, Pondskaters and Water Boatmen are common water insects. Raised bogs are not heavily populated by mammals, although the Irish Hare, Foxes and the Pigmy Shrew are occasional occupants (CVNI, 2011). The total extent of blanket bogs in the UK amounts to just under 1.5 million hectares, with Northern Ireland contributing an estimated 140,000ha (Northern Ireland Habitat Action Plan, 2003). About 15% (22,000ha) of the Northern Ireland blanket bogs remains intact, with 10% (14,000ha) having been drained and 46% (64,400ha) hand‐cut for fuel. The remaining 29 % (40,600ha) of blanket bog vegetation is considered severely degraded and is considered too spoilt to merit restoration (Northern Ireland Habitat Action Plan, 2003). The 2003 Habitat Action Plan for Northern Ireland’s blanket bogs has set the following targets for the conservation of the habitat. Maintain the current extent and overall distribution of blanket bog currently in favourable conditionImprove the condition of those areas of blanket bog which are degraded but readily restorable so that the total area in or approaching favourable condition by 2010 is 36,000ha Introduce management regimes to improve the condition of a further 38,000ha of degraded blanket mire by 2015, resulting in a total of 74,000ha (i.e. around 75% of the total extent of favourable or restorable blanket mire) in or approaching favourable condition. Blanket bog targeted for restoration or improvement will include extensive areas cutover for fuel and in some instances areas used for agriculture and forestry

Figure 26 ‐ Cuilcagh Mountain, Fermanagh

128

128

Fens Fens are peatlands that receive the majority of their water and nutrients from rock and ground water sources. Naturally occur in river valleys, poorly drained basins, along lake margins and in river flood‐plains (Northern Ireland Habitat Action Plan, 2005). The water table in fens sits close to or above the ground surface and in which the water itself is more nutrient‐rich and base‐rich, than that of a bog (National Museums Northern Ireland, 2010).

Fens are ecologically considered the begins of boglands, as fens are covered by mats of floating plants and moss which start to slowly decompose to form the basis of the layers of peat (CVNI, 2011). The term fen covers various ecosystems based on waterlogged peat soils that differ on several points. Based on each fens specific designation, a wide range of variations in water height, pH of the water or the nutrient status of the water, can occur (National Museums Northern Ireland, 2010).Fens facilitate more than two hundred different flora species, however the type of vegetation inhabiting a fen depend on whether a fen is classified as ‘poor’ or ‘rich’ (CVNI, 2011). ‘Poor‐fens’ arise in upland locales and have their water and nutrients feed from sandstone or granite rocks. These environments are dominated by Sphagnum Bog mosses, Purple Moor‐Grass, Bottle Sedge and the smaller sedges, such as Star Sedge and Common Sedge (CVNI, 2011). ‘Rich‐fens’ reside within a restricted range and mostly occur in lowland areas where they are fed by mineral enriched waters. The variety of vegetation is frequently much more diverse than ‘poor‐fens’; including Bog Pimpernel, Meadow Thistle, Saw Sedge, Marsh Helleborine, Blunt‐Flowered Rush, Grass‐of‐Parnassus, Common Butterwort, Black Bog‐Rush Sand Bladderworts (CVNI, 2011). Northern Ireland’s fens play a particularly important role for invertebrates in the UK context, several species which are extinct or threatened in the rest of the UK occur here. These include dragonflies such as the Irish Damselfly, beetles such as the Whirligig beetle, the Water beetle, the Pond Skater and the Carabid beetle (CVNI, 2011). The Northern Ireland Countryside Survey 2000 estimated that fens occupy an area of 2,950ha, with a decrease in territory of 18% (484ha) between 1988 and 1998 (Cooper, McCann, & Rogers, 2009). The 2005 Habitat Action Plan for Northern Ireland’s fens has set the following targets for the conservation of the habitat Maintain the total extent of fen in Northern Ireland at 3,000haWhere favourable, maintain the condition of fen in Northern IrelandAchieve favourable condition of 95% of fen which lies within designated sites, by 2015 For stands outside ASSIs, secure favourable condition over, as near as practicable, 100% of the fen resource in Northern Ireland, by 2015 By 2015, restore 50ha of fen By 2020, restore a further 50ha of fen

Figure 27 ‐ Corbally Fen, Down

129

129

Appendix B Description of Northern Ireland’s Management of Sensitive Sites (MOSS) Scheme

130

130

MOSS is a voluntary scheme administered by Environment and. Heritage Service (EHS), which is designed to ensure the proper ecological management of land within Area of Special Scientific Interest (ASSI). Farmers must agree to a programme of natural habitat recreation/restoration or to leave an ecological important area fallow minimum of 5 years. Participants in the scheme are required to works which adding the upkeep of their registered natural habitat. While keeping records of the work carried out, in addition to allowing access to the habitat to EHS staff at all reasonable times (MOSS, 2002). For this, participants will receive an annual payment (after an EHS inspection) with additional bonus on each anniversary of the signing of the agreement. The EHS also comments to review the levels of payments for each habitat every three years and with contribute to assist with the initial capital costs of when establishing any new habitats (MOSS, 2002). The following are the annual payments under the MOSS system

Habitat Type Payment/ha Payment/m2 Saltmarsh £80 0.8p Sand Dunes £80 0.8p Vegetated Shingle £80 0.8p Maritime Cliff Slope £80 0.8p Reedbeds £110 1.1p Wet Woodland £95 0.95p Mixed Ash Woodland £95 0.95p Oakwood £95 0.95p Parkland £50 0.5p Lowland Dry Acid Grassland £140 1.4p Calcareous Grassland £140 1.4p Lowland Meadow £140 1.4p Purple Moor Grass and Rush Pastures

£140 1.4p

Limestone Pavement £110 1.1p Dry Heath £50 for 1‐100ha

£25>100ha 0.5p for 1‐100ha 0.25p>100ha

Wet Heath

£50 for 1‐100ha £25>100ha

0.5p for 1‐100ha 0.25p>100ha

Mountainous Heath £50 0.5p Raised Bog £70 0.7p Blanket Bog £50 0.5p Fens £110 1.1p Buffer zone ‐ Wildlife Corridors £345 ‐ £385 3.45p ‐ 3.85p

The Potential of Green Roofs to Address Habitat Loss in Northern Ireland

Documents

Transcript of The Potential of Green Roofs to Address Habitat Loss in Northern Ireland