The Policy Voice for Energy Storage Compressed Air Storage for the Electricity Grid Jason Makansi,...

16
The Policy Voice for Energy Storage Compressed Air Storage for the Electricity Grid Jason Makansi, Executive Director President, Pearl Street Inc Author, Lights Out: The Electricity Crisis, the Global Economy, and What It Means to You 314-495-4545 | [email protected] | www.carebs.org Coalition to Advance Renewable Energy through Bulk Storage (CAREBS)

Transcript of The Policy Voice for Energy Storage Compressed Air Storage for the Electricity Grid Jason Makansi,...

The Policy Voice for Energy Storage

Compressed Air Storage for the Electricity Grid

Jason Makansi, Executive DirectorPresident, Pearl Street Inc

Author, Lights Out: The Electricity Crisis, the Global Economy, and What It Means to You

314-495-4545 | [email protected] | www.carebs.org

Coalition to Advance Renewable Energy through Bulk Storage (CAREBS)

The Policy Voice for Energy Storage

The Mission• Promote the benefits of bulk energy storage to

enhance electricity grid operations, including integration of renewable energy, improved reliability and security, advanced market development, and cost efficiencies throughout the production and delivery value chain

• Shape and support federal policies affecting bulk energy storage and work with key state-level and storage organizations to advance energy storage generally

• Distinguish bulk energy storage from distributed storage options - CAES, Pumped Storage Hydroelectric, large-scale batteries and flywheels

2 www.carebs.org |

The Policy Voice for Energy Storage

Why Talk About Bulk Storage?

• Electricity supply industry has precious little ability to “store” its product – just in time inventory

• Electricity has to be consumed as soon as it is produced!

• Renewable energy is extremely variable – at expected penetration levels, will change the way the grid has to operate

• The U.S. has less grid energy storage (~2%) than other developed countries (4-10%)

3 www.carebs.org |

The Policy Voice for Energy Storage4 www.carebs.org |

The Policy Voice for Energy Storage5 www.carebs.org |

CAES Schematic (based on Norton)

The Policy Voice for Energy Storage

6

Geology: Tapping the Mt. Simon Sandstone

Completed Work Activities• Dallas Center Site Selected• Geophysical Surveying• Drilled & Cored Three Test Wells• Economic Analysis Phase I

Current Work Activities• Economic Analysis Phase II• Complete Laboratory Core Analysis• Perform CAES Reservoir Simulation Analysis• Perform Geology Peer Review

GO/NO-GO DECISIONFOR AIR INJECTION TESTING

Spring/Summer 2011

Courtesy: Iowa StoredEnergy Park

The Policy Voice for Energy Storage

CAES Technology Status• 50 plant years of commercial operation – 270 MW facility, Huntorf

Germany (1977), 110 MW facility, McIntosh, Alabama (1994) operated by Power South

• System Improvements for 20% performance gain over McIntosh available from the marketplace today with full warranties

• Advanced systems teed up - Adiabatic CAES and Next-Generation CAES systems slated for demonstration through ARRA Stimulus funding for

• U.S. based supplier (Dresser Rand) with U.S. manufacturing base! Others could bid as well. Performance guarantees available

• More than a dozen commercial and demonstration projects currently being considered

• Above-ground (power plant) piece – today’s commercial offerings pose little to no technology risk

• Below-ground (storage medium) piece – cavern storage proven, aquifer storage needs demonstration but natural gas storage in similar geologies operating for decades

7 www.carebs.org |

The Policy Voice for Energy Storage

Grid Integration• Site specific and will likely change over the course of operation, e.g.

– Utility integrated resource plan model– Energy, capacity, ancillary services market model– Infrastructure network model

• Generic response – D-R Smart CAES– 25-100% in power gen mode with flat cycle efficiency (consistent

heat rate)– Start up to full load less than 10 min (generation mode)– Start up to full load less than 5 min (compression mode)– Rapid load taking off grid +/- 35%/minute (compression)– Rapid capacity added to grid +/-20% (generation mode)

• ISEP – similar to an intermediate-load combined cycle plant– 270 MW CAES Project –fully dispatchable facility– Compress (220 MW) up to 12-16 hrs (nights, weekends)– Generate (270 MW) up to 12-16 hrs weekdays

8 www.carebs.org |

The Policy Voice for Energy Storage

Deployment Challenges

• Efficiency – technical vs. economic• Natural gas consumption• Acceptance by the renewable energy industry• Optimizing location –near the capacity or near the

load?• Monetizing the benefit and value

– Transmission– Ancillary services– Capacity market– Energy market– Avoidance of older fossil plant cycling

9 www.carebs.org |

The Policy Voice for Energy Storage

Lessons Learned

• Have to get the geology right – extensive testing and evaluation (Sandia Experience)

• It may be air but still must be treated with care – detailed process engineering

• Policy framework has to be supportive• Economic and grid modeling needs to

be more robust to illuminate and monetize values

10 www.carebs.org |

The Policy Voice for Energy Storage

CAES Benefits I…• Swings both ways – Acts as load and as capacity• Financeable – underground CAES consistently exhibits

lowest capital costs of all storage options• Competitive – can compete with today’s prevailing options

• Cycling of older, dirtier, and inefficient fossil units• New gas turbine and combined cycle facilities

• Renewable energy firming - can bring more renewable energy to more people more of the time – smooth variability in supply, optimize transmission from high renewable areas to load

• Little technology risk – does not impair grid reliability• Familiarity and comfort

• equipment similar to existing utility gas-turbine based systems

• Storage media proven (caverns) or fully proven in allied industry (e.g., natural gas)

11 www.carebs.org |

The Policy Voice for Energy Storage

CAES Benefits II

• Emissions reduction – Overall much less fossil fuel consumed inefficiently to provide essential grid operating services (e.g., ancillary services)

• Ancillary services – speed (responds within minutes) and duration (4, 12, 16, and more hours generation at partial or full capacity

• Extends benefits seen in gas storage - Can do for the electricity industry what natural gas storage did for the natural gas industry

• Stabilizes electricity markets• Optimizes grid operations and management

12 www.carebs.org |

The Policy Voice for Energy Storage13 www.carebs.org |

Layers of Legislation/Policy Supporting Storage

An Emerging Policy Framework

National Layer NERC Eastern Interconnect Planning Collaborative

 

- Issued Report from Variable Generation Task Force- Annual Long-term Reliability Assessment

Modeling Studies Include Bulk Storage

ISO/RTO Layer NY-ISO PJM MISO CAISO ERCOT WECC SPP

 

FERC Approved Energy Storage Tariffs for Day-ahead and Real-Time Regulation Service Markets(15 min. intervals)

- Ancillary Service - Frequency Regulation

- Ancillary Services Tariffs - Developing Ramping Product

- Approved Tariffs for Ancillary Services from Non-generatorsDeveloping Ramping Product- Modeling Storage in Production & Forecasts

- Day-ahead Ancillary Services Tariffs and Market- Texas Nodal Market Beginning 2011

- Modeling Storage

Variable Energy Generation Policy Initiatives

State Layer

NEW YORK OHIO CALIFORNIA TEXAS UTAH KANSAS OTHERS

- Storage R&D Program  

- Storage Included in the PUCs Alternative Energy Portfolio Standard

- AB2514 Possible Storage Procurement Mandates- Storage Included in Integrated Resource Plan- SDGE Storage Rate Case

- Bill 1421 Utilities Code Amendment Energy Storage Equipment or Facilities- Proposed PUC Rulemaking on Legislative Target of 500 MW of Non-wind Renewable Energy

- Storage RPS- Proposed Renewable Energy Zones Include Storage

- Regulations to implement legislation supporting CAES

- 24 states currently have RPS policies

The Policy Voice for Energy Storage

What CAREBS asks for…• Re-introduction of the storage investment tax

credit (ITC) – Senate bill. Bingaman, Wyden, others

• Appropriate subsidies and incentives that recognize storage as a cost-effective multiplier of renewable energy delivered through the grid

• Inclusion in the proposed Clean Energy Credit program

• FERC incentives similar to transmission assets• Classification by FERC as a separate asset class

with its own benefits to the grid• Inducements to electric utilities and ISO/RTOs to

evaluate bulk storage on a equal basis with generation and transmission assets

14 www.carebs.org |

The Policy Voice for Energy Storage

Marketplace Realities• Legislative/policy framework still evolving• Value to monetize still may not be transparent

• Carbon credits• Costs of cycling fossil units• Modeling capabilities still evolving

• Underground CAES exhibits lowest estimated capital costs of all storage options

• CAES equipment comes with WRAP and performance guarantees

• CAES satisfies response time and duration requirements of most storage applications

• CAES can compete against today’s prevailing options - gas turbine and combined-cycle solutions and deeper cycling of fossil assets

15 www.carebs.org |

The Policy Voice for Energy Storage

To learn more, visit:www.carebs.org

Or contact: [email protected]