The persistent case of media effects research [lecture 2011]

33
The persistence case of ‘media effects’ research 1

description

Lecture slides for MAC201 Media Studies 1 students

Transcript of The persistent case of media effects research [lecture 2011]

Page 1: The persistent case of media effects research [lecture 2011]

The persistence case of ‘media effects’ research�

1

Page 2: The persistent case of media effects research [lecture 2011]

The importance of audience research data

Commercial broadcasters Politicians Policy planners Regulators Health care professionals Academics Technology companies Content producers The general public

2

5% 13%

18%

31%

19%

14% Audience

share

0-16

17-24

25-34

35-44

45-54

55+

Page 3: The persistent case of media effects research [lecture 2011]

The media terrain is wide…

Books Art Film Television Internet Video games Music Comics

3

Page 4: The persistent case of media effects research [lecture 2011]

Different stakeholders = different interests

4

Page 5: The persistent case of media effects research [lecture 2011]

Time consuming, costly and complex

5

Page 6: The persistent case of media effects research [lecture 2011]

Myths

6

Page 7: The persistent case of media effects research [lecture 2011]

7

Page 8: The persistent case of media effects research [lecture 2011]

Myths

‘The history of audience research is littered with the corpses of studies that have tried and failed to demonstrate, once and for all, a cause and effect relationship between media message and receiver behaviour’ (Ross & Nightingale, 2003: p9)

8

Page 9: The persistent case of media effects research [lecture 2011]

Sensitive to ideological objections

9

Page 10: The persistent case of media effects research [lecture 2011]

Effects Research

10

Page 11: The persistent case of media effects research [lecture 2011]

A few useful background texts

11

Page 12: The persistent case of media effects research [lecture 2011]

The direction of effects research

12

Page 13: The persistent case of media effects research [lecture 2011]

The direction of effects research

‘despite decades of work in which researchers have tried to demonstrate the cause-effect relationship, it has never actually been possible to isolate out the specific influence of media from the other factors, including individual pathology, on human behaviour’ (Ross and Nightengale, 2003: 72)

13

Page 14: The persistent case of media effects research [lecture 2011]

The basic historical trajectory

Effects Now? Encoding / Decoding

Uses and Gratifications

Passive Active Autonomous? Interactive?

Socially situated

14

Page 15: The persistent case of media effects research [lecture 2011]

4 phases (see McQuail, 1993, 2010)

Phase 1 – media as all-powerful Phase 2 - media as all-powerful challenged Phase 3 – powerful media revisited Phase 4 – negotiating media meaning

15

Page 16: The persistent case of media effects research [lecture 2011]

Phase 1 – media as all-powerful

1900-1930s Media as a top-down model of communication From the power elites to ‘the masses’

16

Page 17: The persistent case of media effects research [lecture 2011]

Phase 1 – media as all-powerful

Ivan Pavlov Physiologist 1901 ‘Conditional reflex’ Classical conditioning

17

Page 18: The persistent case of media effects research [lecture 2011]

Phase 1 – media as all-powerful

18

Page 19: The persistent case of media effects research [lecture 2011]

The tail wagging the dog?

19

Page 20: The persistent case of media effects research [lecture 2011]

Phase 2 - media as all-powerful challenged

1930s-1950s Studies into voting patterns Studies into juvenile delinquency Acknowledgment of multiple variables Impact of positivism Influence of behaviourism

20

Page 21: The persistent case of media effects research [lecture 2011]

Phase 2 - media as all-powerful challenged

B.F. Skinner Behaviourist Schedules of reinforcement Operant Conditioning Chamber (aka the Skinner Box) Cause and effect

21

Page 22: The persistent case of media effects research [lecture 2011]

Phase 2 - media as all-powerful challenged

22

Page 23: The persistent case of media effects research [lecture 2011]

Phase 2 - media as all-powerful challenged

23

Page 24: The persistent case of media effects research [lecture 2011]

Phase 3 – powerful media revisited

1960s longer-term effects more subtle shifts in comprehension diversity in motivations of media use George Gerbner’s cultivation analysis theory

24

Page 25: The persistent case of media effects research [lecture 2011]

Phase 3 – powerful media revisited

Albert Bandura 1961-63 Social learning theory The Bobo Doll Experiments Exposure to aggressive modelling

25

Page 26: The persistent case of media effects research [lecture 2011]

Phase 3 – powerful media revisited

26

Page 27: The persistent case of media effects research [lecture 2011]

Phase 3 – powerful media revisited

Criticisms? Ferguson (2010) suggest the Bobo Doll studies are not studies of aggression at all •  Children were motivated to imitate the adult

in the belief the videos were instructions. •  Children were motivated by the desire to

please adults rather than genuine aggression. •  The external validity of the study noting that

Bobo Dolls are designed to be hit.

27

Page 28: The persistent case of media effects research [lecture 2011]

Phase 4 – negotiating media meaning

1970s onwards Focus on media message construction and how audiences deconstruct these An examination of what audiences did with media, rather than what the media did to audiences Qualitative research Ethnography

28

Page 29: The persistent case of media effects research [lecture 2011]

What happens next?

A new dimension? More cause and effect? Brain science? Neuroscience + psychology?

29

Page 30: The persistent case of media effects research [lecture 2011]

Summary

Models have changed Cyclical arguments, claims and counter-claims Identification? Addition? Desensitisation? Morals?

30

Page 31: The persistent case of media effects research [lecture 2011]

The biggest problem?

•  The research approach: – Content analysis? – Physical stimuli? – Trend analysis? – Closed question surveys? – Participant observation? – Focus groups? – Ethnography?

31

Page 33: The persistent case of media effects research [lecture 2011]

Images

The tartanpodcast, 2009, Social Media Outposts M. Mackenzie, 2008, Top Secret Codeword Data $PHPhoto, 2008, Time is Money FrozenCapybara, 2007, Wait, where am I again? Ramkarthikblogger, 2009, Direction Nina Leen (LIFE), 1964, B F Skinner training a rat Holah.co.uk (date unknown), bobo2 Mal Cubed, 2005, MB1NR-3 A. Diez Herrero, 2007, creative commons -Franz Patzig-

33