THE PARIAH AS REBEL. 1.THINKING WITHOUT A BANISTER What is Arendt’s conception of philosophy?...
-
Upload
david-martin -
Category
Documents
-
view
214 -
download
1
Transcript of THE PARIAH AS REBEL. 1.THINKING WITHOUT A BANISTER What is Arendt’s conception of philosophy?...
![Page 1: THE PARIAH AS REBEL. 1.THINKING WITHOUT A BANISTER What is Arendt’s conception of philosophy? 2.THE BANALITY OF EVIL How does Arendt conceive of totalitarianism?](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062517/56649e7c5503460f94b7ecab/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
THE PARIAH AS REBEL
![Page 2: THE PARIAH AS REBEL. 1.THINKING WITHOUT A BANISTER What is Arendt’s conception of philosophy? 2.THE BANALITY OF EVIL How does Arendt conceive of totalitarianism?](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062517/56649e7c5503460f94b7ecab/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
1.THINKING WITHOUT A BANISTER
What is Arendt’s conception of philosophy?
2.THE BANALITY OF EVIL
How does Arendt conceive of totalitarianism?
3. THE RIGHT TO HAVE RIGHTS
Is cosmopolitan law necessary to overcome statelessness?
![Page 3: THE PARIAH AS REBEL. 1.THINKING WITHOUT A BANISTER What is Arendt’s conception of philosophy? 2.THE BANALITY OF EVIL How does Arendt conceive of totalitarianism?](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062517/56649e7c5503460f94b7ecab/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
1. THINKING WITHOUT A BANISTER
![Page 4: THE PARIAH AS REBEL. 1.THINKING WITHOUT A BANISTER What is Arendt’s conception of philosophy? 2.THE BANALITY OF EVIL How does Arendt conceive of totalitarianism?](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062517/56649e7c5503460f94b7ecab/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
HANNAH ARENDT (1906-1975)
BIOGRAPHICAL NOTIONS: 26 October 1906: born in Hannover (Germany). 1909: emigration to Königsberg. 1913: death of her father. 1924-1928: study of philosophy, theology and Greek in
Marburg, Freiburg and Heidelberg. 1929: marriage with Günther Stern (Anders). 1933: imprisonment by the Gestapo and escape to Paris. 1940: marriage with Heinrich Blücher and detention in the
concentration camp Gurs. 1941: immigration to the United States. 1941-1944: editor of the journal ‘Aufbau’. 1953-1956: Professor at Brooklyn College (New York). 1963-1967: Professor at the University of Chicago. 1967-1975: Professor at the New School of Social
Research (New York). 4 December 1975: death.
![Page 5: THE PARIAH AS REBEL. 1.THINKING WITHOUT A BANISTER What is Arendt’s conception of philosophy? 2.THE BANALITY OF EVIL How does Arendt conceive of totalitarianism?](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062517/56649e7c5503460f94b7ecab/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
IMPORTANT PUBLICATIONS Liebesbegriff bei Augustin (1929). Rahel Varnhage: Lebensgeschichte einer
deutschen Jüdin aus der Romantik (1939). The Jew as Pariah: A Hidden Tradition (1944). The Origins of Totalitarianism (1951). The Human Condition (1958). Eichmann in Jerusalem: A Report on the Banality
of Evil (1963). On Revolution (1963). On Violence (1970). Das Denken (1973). Das Wollen (1974).
![Page 6: THE PARIAH AS REBEL. 1.THINKING WITHOUT A BANISTER What is Arendt’s conception of philosophy? 2.THE BANALITY OF EVIL How does Arendt conceive of totalitarianism?](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062517/56649e7c5503460f94b7ecab/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
ANTI-FOUNDATIONALISM
Arendt is philosophy is not about epistemology, but about politics.
Since Plato philosophers tried to impose their standards of truth upon politics.
Thinking without a banister (Denken ohne Geländer) > there is not a fixed foundation upon which to base thinking.
A critic of the logocentric tradition > suppresses plurality.
![Page 7: THE PARIAH AS REBEL. 1.THINKING WITHOUT A BANISTER What is Arendt’s conception of philosophy? 2.THE BANALITY OF EVIL How does Arendt conceive of totalitarianism?](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062517/56649e7c5503460f94b7ecab/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
PHILOSOPHICAL STYLE
Personal experiences of political events as point of departure.
A mixture of a narrative and analytical style.
The integration of different kind of discourses (literature, history, philosophy, etc.).
![Page 8: THE PARIAH AS REBEL. 1.THINKING WITHOUT A BANISTER What is Arendt’s conception of philosophy? 2.THE BANALITY OF EVIL How does Arendt conceive of totalitarianism?](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062517/56649e7c5503460f94b7ecab/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
HEURISTIC VALUE
1. History (Goldhagen).
2. Post-structuralism (Kristeva).
3. Post-marxism (Mouffe).
4. Critical theory (Habermas).
5. Queer theory (Butler).
6. Sociology (Sennett).
7. Feminism (Benhabib).
![Page 9: THE PARIAH AS REBEL. 1.THINKING WITHOUT A BANISTER What is Arendt’s conception of philosophy? 2.THE BANALITY OF EVIL How does Arendt conceive of totalitarianism?](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062517/56649e7c5503460f94b7ecab/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
2. THE BANALITY OF EVIL
![Page 10: THE PARIAH AS REBEL. 1.THINKING WITHOUT A BANISTER What is Arendt’s conception of philosophy? 2.THE BANALITY OF EVIL How does Arendt conceive of totalitarianism?](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062517/56649e7c5503460f94b7ecab/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
THE JEWISH QUESTION
The Jewish question
- refers to designate a whole series of shifting, loosely related, historical, cultural, religious, economic, political, and social issues;
- is an expression initially gained popularity in the writings of anti-semites;
- is related to an underlying anxiety about the fate of the Jewish people in the modern age.
Arendt: “I have refused to abandon the Jewish question as the focal point of my historical and political thinking.”
![Page 11: THE PARIAH AS REBEL. 1.THINKING WITHOUT A BANISTER What is Arendt’s conception of philosophy? 2.THE BANALITY OF EVIL How does Arendt conceive of totalitarianism?](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062517/56649e7c5503460f94b7ecab/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
OUTLAWS
Outlaws > Jewish parvenu and the Jewish pariah.Rahel Varnhagen: despite her parvenu tendencies
and aspirations, she finally affirms herself as a rebel, i.e. a pariah.
There is a hidden tradition of the jew as a pariah.Schlemihl > lord of dreams (Traumweltherscher).Conscious pariah > a political response to the
situation (for example Bernard Lazare or women who refuse to accept or assimilate to prevailing social relationships).
![Page 12: THE PARIAH AS REBEL. 1.THINKING WITHOUT A BANISTER What is Arendt’s conception of philosophy? 2.THE BANALITY OF EVIL How does Arendt conceive of totalitarianism?](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062517/56649e7c5503460f94b7ecab/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
TOTALITARIANISM
Arendt is mainly interested in the origins of totalitarianism and not the causes.
What are the two main origins:
1. Totalitarianism.
2. Anti-Semitism.When are these origins triggered to become
dangerous > the end of the nation-state.Significant of national socialism: the banality
of evil.
![Page 13: THE PARIAH AS REBEL. 1.THINKING WITHOUT A BANISTER What is Arendt’s conception of philosophy? 2.THE BANALITY OF EVIL How does Arendt conceive of totalitarianism?](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062517/56649e7c5503460f94b7ecab/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
3. THE RIGHT TO HAVE RIGHTS
![Page 14: THE PARIAH AS REBEL. 1.THINKING WITHOUT A BANISTER What is Arendt’s conception of philosophy? 2.THE BANALITY OF EVIL How does Arendt conceive of totalitarianism?](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062517/56649e7c5503460f94b7ecab/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
THEORY AND PRACTICE
The Origins of Totalitarianism > to show that National Socialism and Stalinism is mainly the product of European and Anti-Semitism and Imperialism.
The Human Condition > what kind of action and thinking led to National Socialism and Stalinism.
Vita contemplativa > theory.Vita activa > praxis.This philosophical opposition makes us blind for
a more differentiated view on human action.
![Page 15: THE PARIAH AS REBEL. 1.THINKING WITHOUT A BANISTER What is Arendt’s conception of philosophy? 2.THE BANALITY OF EVIL How does Arendt conceive of totalitarianism?](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062517/56649e7c5503460f94b7ecab/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
THREE FORMS OF HUMAN ACTION
Vita activa comprehends three forms of action:1. Labour (ponos) > biological reproduction.2. Work (poiesis) > the production of tools and things.3. Action (praxis) > showing your uniqueness via deliberation.
![Page 16: THE PARIAH AS REBEL. 1.THINKING WITHOUT A BANISTER What is Arendt’s conception of philosophy? 2.THE BANALITY OF EVIL How does Arendt conceive of totalitarianism?](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062517/56649e7c5503460f94b7ecab/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
THE MODERN AGE
A political crisis caused by the oppression of action.
The animal laborans dominates the zoon politicon > instrumental reason.
The oikos becomes more important than the polis.
The current reconfiguration of the relation between the public realm and the private realm implies a depolitization.
![Page 17: THE PARIAH AS REBEL. 1.THINKING WITHOUT A BANISTER What is Arendt’s conception of philosophy? 2.THE BANALITY OF EVIL How does Arendt conceive of totalitarianism?](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062517/56649e7c5503460f94b7ecab/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
THE RIGHTS OF STATELESS MIGRANTS
The experience of statelessness (so-called illegal immigrants).
The tension between inclusive human rights and the demand for territorial national sovereignty.
Human rights were understood to be inalienable, ahistorical universal rights which were to be upheld even against the sovereignty of the state.
Problem: how can human rights be guaranteed and protected?
Arendt > the most basic right is “the right to have rights (and that means to live in a framework where one is judged by one’s actions and opinions) and a right to belong to some kind of organized community.”
![Page 18: THE PARIAH AS REBEL. 1.THINKING WITHOUT A BANISTER What is Arendt’s conception of philosophy? 2.THE BANALITY OF EVIL How does Arendt conceive of totalitarianism?](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062517/56649e7c5503460f94b7ecab/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
“That the soft water in movement
In time will winn from the mighty
hard stone
You know, the hard will lose.”
Bertold Brecht
![Page 19: THE PARIAH AS REBEL. 1.THINKING WITHOUT A BANISTER What is Arendt’s conception of philosophy? 2.THE BANALITY OF EVIL How does Arendt conceive of totalitarianism?](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062517/56649e7c5503460f94b7ecab/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FUwx_PnURMc